Download - Education in the Philippines
EDUCATION IN THE PHILIPPINES
A Case Study on
The New Philippine Educational System
In Partial Fulfillment
Of the Requirements for the
Subject SS18
Submitted by:
PATRICK ANGELO D. CLAUDIO
INTRODUCTION
What is Education?
Education in its general sense is a form of learning in which knowledge, skills, and habits of a
group of people are transferred from one generation to the next through teaching, training,
research, or simply through autodidacticism. Generally, it occurs through any experience that
has a formative effect on the way one thinks, feels, or acts.
Etymologically, the word "education" is derived from the Latin ēducātiō (“A breeding, a bringing
up, a rearing") from ēdūcō (“I educate, I train”) which is related to the homonym ēdūcō (“I lead
forth, I take out; I raise up, I erect”) from ē- (“from, out of”) and dūcō (“I lead, I conduct”).
Overview of Philippine Education
The system of education in the Philippines was patterned, both from the educational systems of
Spain and the United States. However, after the liberation of the Philippines in 1946, the
system have changed radically and moved at its own.
The Department of Education (or DepEd) administers the whole educational system, which also
includes the allocation of funds utilized for school services and equipment (such as books,
school chairs, etc.), recruitment of teachers for all public schools in the Philippines, and the
supervision and organization of the school curricula.
The former education system of the Philippines is composed of: 6 years of elementary
education starting at the age of 6 or 7, and 4 years of high school education starting at the age
of 12 or 13. In this system, education is not compulsory.
However, since June 4, 2012, DepEd started to implement the new K-12 educational system,[3]
which includes the new curricula for all schools (see the section). In this system, education is
now compulsory.
All public and private schools in the Philippines must start classes from a date mandated by the
Department of Education (usually every first Monday of June for public schools only), and must
end after each school completes the mandated 200-day school calendar of DepEd (usually
around the third week of March to the second week of April).
HISTORY
Ancient Times
In pre-Spanish times, education was still decentralized. Children were provided more vocational
training but less academics in their houses by their parents and in the houses of their tribal
tutors. They were using a unique system of writing known as the baybayin. When the Spanish
arrived in Manila, they were surprised to find a population with a literacy rate higher than the
literacy rate of Madrid.
Spanish Period
During the Spanish Colonial Period of the Philippines (1565-1898) most of the archipelago
underwent a deep cultural, religious and linguistic transformation from various native Asian
cultures and traditions with Islamic or animist religious practices, to a unique hybrid of
Southeast Asian and Western culture including the Catholic faith.
Spanish education played a major role in that transformation. The oldest universities, colleges,
vocational schools and the first modern public education system in Asia were created during
the colonial period. By the time Spain was replaced by the United States as the colonial power,
Filipinos were among the most educated subjects in all of Asia.
The Educational Decree of 1863 created a free public education system in the Philippines, run
by the government. It was the first such education system in Asia. The decree mandated the
establishment of at least one primary school for boys and one for girls in each town under the
responsibility of the municipal government; and the establishment of a normal school for male
teachers under the supervision of the Jesuits. Primary education was free and available to every
Filipino, regardless of race or social class. Contrary to what the propaganda of the Spanish–
American War tried to depict, they were not religious schools, but schools established,
supported and maintained by the Spanish Government.
In 1866, the total population of the Philippines was only 4,411,261. The total public schools for
boys was 841, and 833 was for girls, while the total number of children attending these schools
was 135,098 for boys, and 95,260 for girls. In 1892, the number of schools had increased to
2,137, in which 1,087 were for boys, and 1,050 for girls. By 1898, enrollment in schools at all
levels exceeded 200,000 students.
First Republic
The defeat of Spain following the Spanish-American War let to the short-lived independence
and establishment of the First Philippine Republic. The schools maintained by Spain for more
than three centuries were closed for a short period but were reopened on August 29, 1898 by
the Secretary of Interior. The Burgos Institute in Malolos, the Military Academy of Malolos, and
the Literary University of the Philippines were established. Article 23 of the Malolos
Constitution mandated that public education would be free and obligatory in all schools of the
nation under the First Philippine Republic. However, the Philippine–American War hindered to
fulfill the mandate.
American Period
During the United States colonial period of the Philippines (1898-1943), the United States
government was in charge of providing education in the Philippines. Education became a very
important issue for the United States colonial government, since it allowed it to spread their
cultural values, particularly the English language, to the Filipino people.
Every child from age 7 was required to register in schools located in their own town or
province. The students were given free school materials. There were three levels of education
during the American period. The "elementary" level consisted of four primary years and 3
intermediate years. The "secondary" or high school level consisted of four years; and the third
was the "college" or tertiary level. Religion was not part of the curriculum of the schools. as it
had been during the Spanish period.
In 1908, the Philippine Legislature approved Act No. 1870, which created the University of the
Philippines. The Reorganization Act of 1916 provided the Filipinization of all department
secretaries except the Secretary of Public Instruction.
Post World War II
In 1947, by the virtue of Executive Order No. 94, the Department of Instruction was changed to
the Department of Education. During this period, the regulation and supervision of public and
private schools belonged to the Bureau of Public and Private Schools.
Marcos Era
In 1972, the Department of Education became the Department of Education and Culture by the
virtue of Proclamation 1081 which was signed by President Ferdinand Marcos.
Following a referendum of all barangays in the Philippines from January 10–15, 1973, on
January 17, 1973, President Marcos ratified the 1973 Constitution by Proclamation 1102. The
1973 Constitution set out the three fundamental aims of education in the Philippines, to:
Foster love of country; teach the duties of citizenship; and develop moral character, self-
discipline, and scientific, technological and vocational efficiency.
On September 24, 1972, by Presidential Decree No. 1, the Department of Education, Culture
and Sports were decentralized with decision-making shared among thirteen regional offices.
In 1978, by the Presidential Decree No. 1397, the Department of Education and Culture became
the Ministry of Education and Culture.
The Education Act of 1982 provided for an integrated system of education covering both formal
and nonformal education at all levels. Section 29 of the act sought to upgrade education
institutions' standards to achieve "quality education", through voluntary accreditation for
schools, colleges, and universities; Section 16 and Section 17 upgraded the obligations and
qualifications required for teachers and administrators; while Section 41 provided for
government financial assistance to private schools. This act also created the Ministry of
Education, Culture and Sports.
Fifth Republic
On February 2, 1987, a new Constitution for the Philippines was ratified. Section 3, Article XIV of
the 1987 Constitution contains the ten fundamental aims of education in the Philippines.
In 1987 by virtue of Executive Order No. 117, the Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports,
became the Department of Education, Culture and Sports. The structure of DECS as embodied
in the order remained practically unchanged until 1994.
On May 26, 1988, the Congress of the Philippines enacted the Republic Act 6655, the Free
Public Secondary Education Act of 1988, which mandated free public secondary education
commencing in the school year 1988–1989.
On February 3, 1992, the Congress enacted Republic Act 7323, which provided that students
aged 15 to 25 may be employed during Christmas and summer vacation with a salary not lower
than the minimum wage. 60% of the wage is to be paid by the employer and 40% is by the
government.
The Congressional Commission on Education (EDCOM) report of 1991 recommended the
division of DECS into three parts. On May 18, 1994, the Congress passed Republic Act 7722, the
Higher Education Act of 1994, creating the Commission on Higher Education (CHED), which
assumed the functions of the Bureau of Higher Education, and supervises tertiary degree
programs. On August 25, 1994, the Congress passed Republic Act 7796, the Technical Education
and Skills Development Act of 1994, creating the Technical Education and Skills Development
Authority (TESDA), which absorbed the Bureau of Technical-Vocational Education plus the
National Manpower and Youth Council, and supervises non-degree technical-vocational
programs. DECS retained responsibility for all elementary and secondary education. This
threefold division became known as the "trifocal system of education in the Philippines".
During the 21st century
In August 2001, Republic Act 9155, otherwise called the Governance of Basic Education Act, was
passed transforming the name of the Department of Education, Culture and Sports (DECS) to
the Department of Education (DepEd) and redefining the role of field offices (regional offices,
division offices, district offices and schools). The act provides the overall framework for (i)
school head empowerment by strengthening their leadership roles and (ii) school-based
management within the context of transparency and local accountability. The goal of basic
education is to provide the school age population and young adults with skills, knowledge and
values to become caring, self-reliant, productive and patriotic citizens.
K-12 program
The K to 12 Program covers Kindergarten and 12 years of basic education (six years of
primary education, four years of Junior High School, and two years of Senior High School
[SHS]) to provide sufficient time for mastery of concepts and skills, develop lifelong learners,
and prepare graduates for tertiary education, middle-level skills development, employment,
and entrepreneurship.
Every Filipino child now has access to early childhood education through Universal
Kindergarten. At 5 years old, children start schooling and are given the means to slowly adjust
to formal education.
The implementation of the K-12 program is "phased". The first phase of the implementation
will start on SY 2012-2013. During this school year, universal kindergarten will be finally offered,
and will now be a part of the compulsory education system; and a new curriculum for Grade 1
and Grade 7 students would be introduced. By SY 2016-2017, Grade 11/Year 5 will be
introduced, and Grade 12/Year 6 by SY 2017-2018; with the phased implementation of the new
curriculum finished by the SY 2017-2018. Students in 2nd year to 4th year high school this SY
2012-2013 are not included in the program. It is only applicable to students from Kinder to 1st
year high school which is now called Grade 7.
CASE STUDY
The paradox of Philippine education
It is well known that the enactment of the K-12 is dividing the opinion of people. One of the
well known thoughts on the matter is the paradox, “Education is the way out of poverty, but
the people can’t afford education”
In order to gauge the responses of the people if they want the new system or not, an interview
survey was conducted last January 2, 2013 at the San Miguel Integrated Sales. 150 randomly
selected single and childless employees were asked a series of standard questions along with
some follow up questions in order for us to know what the working-class think about the K-12
educational system.
Survey questions
1. Do you know the K-12 education system?
2. Do you approve the passing of the new system?
3. Do you think this will enhance the quality of graduates in our country?
a. Why? (Top 3 answers)
4. Can your family afford the 3 years extra education if you were under it?
5. If you had a child, do you think you can afford the K-12 system?
6. Would you let your child finish the tertiary level?
7. Which alternative focus would you suggest that the government should take?
a. Quality of education
b. Funding of state universities and colleges
c. Better fresh graduates employment
d. None. I like the new system
8. Do you think that the people were not referenced on this passing?
Results
1. 127 Yes; 23 No
2. 81 Yes; 69 No
3. 37 Yes; 113 No
a. Top answers are: lack of quality education, inept instructors, financial
incapability
4. 101 Yes; 49 No
5. 94 Yes; 56 No
6. 94 Yes; 0 No (Based on 94 Yes respondents on question 5.)
7. 73 A; 31 B; 35 C; 11 D
8. 138 Yes; 12 No
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The students are well aware of the K-12 system although follow up questions indicates that
they are not informed of the different aspects behind it. Majority of the students are in favor of
the passing though a substantial amount feels otherwise. Amazingly, a larger margin of
students does not believe that the new system would produce better graduates because of lack
of quality education, inept instructors and financial incapability. Obviously, majority of the
respondents could afford the new systems since they are enrolled in a high tier university,
although others are reluctant. Same results if they are hypothetically paying for their children’s
education. Majority believes that they could afford the extra years. However, only 94 would let
their children finish tertiary level. The students also agree with the social consensus that the
government should focus on the quality of education more instead of the quantity. They also
believed that they were not properly referenced or surveyed about the new system.
With these results I can say that people are open to the new system that is being implemented
by the government. Although they should take into consideration the capability of the parents
who supports the students. They may have action plans with regards to the shortages of
materials and classrooms, they should also think of the capacity of parents to give for the
education.
SOURCES
Definition: Dewey, John (1916/1944). Democracy and Education. The Free Press. pp. 1–4.
Educate: http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=educate
Overview of Philippine Education: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_in_the_Philippines
K-12 Primer: http://www.deped.gov.ph/cpanel/uploads/issuanceImg/Kto12%20Primer%20as
%20of%20Dec%202011.pdf
Ancient Times: Damon L. Woods (2006), The Philippines: A Global Studies Handbook, ABC-CLIO,
p. 140
Spanish Period: Coleman, Ambrose. The Friars in the Philippines. Charleston, South Carolina,
United States of America, 2009
Leroy James A. The Americans in the Philippines. BiblioBazaar, LLC, pp. 36
http://countrystudies.us/philippines/53.htm
American Period: Karnow, Stanley. In Our Image: America’s Empire in the Philippines. Ballantine
Books, Random House, Inc., March 3, 1990
http://www.deped.gov.ph/
Marcos Era: Doris D Tulio. Foundations of Education. 2nd Ed, National Book Store,
Mandaluyong City, 2008
21st Century: James Konstantin Galvez; Llanesca T. Panti (January 15, 2009), US provides $86-M
aid for quality education, The Manila Times
K-12 FAQs: http://www.deped.gov.ph/cpanel/uploads/issuanceImg/Kto12%20FAQs%20as
%20of%20December%202011.pdf