RESULTSOF THE NATIONAL CONSULTATIONS ON POST-
2015 AGENDA IN THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC
May 6, 2013
Djunushaliev M.T.National institute for strategic studies
of the Kyrgyz Republic
What are the national consultations?
Period:• January, 2012 - April, 2013 – in Kyrgyzstan
• Up to 1 year – in the other countries
Purpose
• wide discussion on the "Development Agenda in Kyrgyzstan after 2015"
• building a global vision of “the future we want”
• impact on intergovernmental processes in the development after 2015
2010 -MDG
SummitRio +20
UN System Task Team
SG's High-level Panel
of Eminent Persons
Working Group on
Sustainable Developme
nt Goals
Adoption of the post-2015
UN development
agenda
What are the national consultations?
The results of the national consultations
Report of the National Consultations
• April 2013
Summit ofUN
member-states
September2013
Intergovernmental process and discussions
on the development agenda post 2015
End of 2013 – 2014
UN System Task Team: Proposed integrated framework for realizing the “the future we want for all" in the post-2015 UN development agenda
Human rights
Equality
Stability
Environmental Sustainability
Peace
and security
Inclusive
social
development
Inclusive economic
development
The area of the national consultations
Inclusive economic development
Economic growth and employment
Food security and agriculture
Environmental Sustainability
Energy
Water
Environmental sustainability
Inclusive
social
development
Demographic dynamics
Healthcare
Education
Family as an institution
Inequality
Peace
and security
Governance
Conflicts and instability
Values
Methodology of the national consultations
Government sector
Civil society
Scientific and expert community
Private sector
Average household
Migrants (internal and external)
Families of migrant workers
Small scale traders + small business +
small farmers
Women (heads of households, farms)
Ethnic minorities
Community groups
Older people
Teachers, doctors
International organizations
Youth (14-28 years)
Children (from 5 to 7 years and under 14
years)
Stateless persons
Refugees
Workers in the informal sector
People with disabilities. Families living
people with disabilities
Groups, directly or indirectly affected by
conflict and / or natural disasters + border
communities
Unemployed
Members of PLHIV community and key
populations at higher risk (IDU, SW, LGBT)
Base questions of the national consultations
How do you want to see the future of Kyrgyzstan in 15 years? Name three areas
Why do you consider these three areas important?
What do you need to do to achieve this? What's stopping you?
Who can help to achieve it?
What can you do for this?
Gathered more than 20.000 responses
1. By selective interviews
2. In focus group discussions
3. Interviewing experts and
individual members of key
groups at higher risk
5. Survey via social networks
653 respondents
382 respondents took part in 27 FGDs
Interviews were included in Nation-wide
Survey, FDGs, on-line Survey
54 respondents
750 respondents, unique respondents –
596 users
4. On-line survey via emails +
web survey tools
Total participants: 1 685 respondents
National Consultation Coverage
FGDs Geographical coverage
PLHIV, IDUs, SC, LGBT– 16Youth under 14 лет – 15
Ethnic groups– 15Families of migrant workers - 12
Women as the heads of households – 14Community groups– 17
Cross-boarder population – 13
Affected by conflict - 26Food insecure population – 10
Children up to 5 years– 15Small business– 14
Average households - 20
Aged people – 16PLHIV, IDUs, SC, LGBT – 17
Trade Unions – 18Работодатели - 10Unemployed – 17
refugees– 12informal sector workers– 16
ethnic groups– 16migrants - 14
People with disabilities + their families - 14
Public employees - 17
Youth 12-14 years - 14Stateless persons– 17
Farmers- 15
General characteristics of the respondents
EducationВысшее
Более 1 высшего образованияСреднее специальноеПолное среднее
Неполное среднее
Gender
Male (52%)
Female (48%)
Ethnics
Kyrgyz (55%)
Russians (20%)
Uzbeks (12%)
Others (12%)
Responses correlation with Areas
1Economic growth and employment
2Food security and agriculture
3 Energy4 Water
5Environmental sustainability
6 Demographic dynamics7 Healthcare8 Education9 Family as an institution
10 Inequality
11 Governance
12 Conflicts and instability13 Values0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Responses correlation within Nation-wide Survey and FGDs
1Economic growth and employment
2Food security and agriculture
3 Energy4 Water
5Environmental sustainability
6 Demographic dynamics7 Healthcare8 Education9 Family as an institution
10 Inequality
11 Governance
12 Conflicts and instability13 Values0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Responses correlation within on-line (e-mail)+ web survey
1Economic growth and employment
2Food security and agriculture
3 Energy4 Water
5Environmental sustainability
6 Demographic dynamics7 Healthcare8 Education9 Family as an institution
10 Inequality
11 Governance
12 Conflicts and instability0
50
100
150
200
250
300
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Responses correlation within Social Media channels
1Economic growth and employment
2Food security and agriculture
3 Energy4 Water
5Environmental sustainability
6 Demographic dynamics7 Healthcare8 Education9 Family as an institution
10 Inequality
11 Governance
12 Conflicts and instability0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Thank you for your attention!