Download - Establishing Protection
![Page 1: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Establishing Protection
Intro to IP – Prof. Merges
3.10.09
![Page 2: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Zatarain’s v. Oak Grove Smokehouse
Formerly “Chick-Fri”
![Page 3: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Agenda
• Zatarain’s recap and review
• Intro to trade dress
![Page 4: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Zatarain’s
• Generic marks: defense
• Statute: section 14, 15 USC 1064(c)
![Page 5: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Hierarchy of distinctiveness
• Arbitrary: Exxon; Google
• Fanciful: Apple Computer
• Suggestive: “Coppertone” suntan lotion
• Descriptive: Quick-Dri Hairdryers; Speedo bathing suits
![Page 6: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
![Page 7: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Descrip-tive Mark
GenericMark
Fanciful Mark
![Page 8: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Generic Marks
• Words that do not serve as trademarks
• Identified with category or type of product, rather than one company or source: Aspirin; Jello; Cellophane; Thermos; Kleenex/Xerox?
![Page 9: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Marks “born generic”
• A category of “descriptive” marks under section 2
• Refused registration under Lanham Act sec. 2(e): “Consists of a mark which (1) when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant is merely descriptive . . .”, 15 USC 1052(e)
![Page 10: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Genericide
• The mark is originally distinctive, and protectable; but becomes over time generic
• A trademark that is “too successful” -- ?
![Page 11: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Cancellation: 15 USC 1064
A petition to cancel a registration of a mark, stating the grounds relied upon, may, upon payment of the prescribed fee, be filed . . .
(3) At any time if the registered mark becomes the generic name for the goods or services, or a portion thereof, for which it is registered . . . .
![Page 12: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
“Judicial cancellation”
• Court-agency interaction
• Judicial review of the trademark register
![Page 13: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Hierarchy of distinctiveness
• Arbitrary: Exxon; Google
• Fanciful: Apple Computer
• Suggestive: “Coppertone” suntan lotion
• Descriptive: Quick-Dri Hairdryers; Speedo bathing suits
![Page 14: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Hierarchy of distinctiveness• Arbitrary: Exxon; Google
• Fanciful: Apple Computer
• Suggestive: “Coppertone” suntan lotion
• Descriptive: Quick-Dri Hairdryers; Speedo bathing suits
• Generic
![Page 15: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
• A & F
• Sugg.
• Des.
• Generic
Inherently Distinctive
Requires proof of “secondary meaning”
No trademark protection
![Page 16: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Categorizations
Trademark
• TENDER VITTLES (cat food)• ROACH MOTEL (roach trap)• CHAP STICK (lip balm)• VISION CENTER (optical store)• BEER NUTS (snack food)• FAB (laundry detergent)• BOLD (laundry detergent)• STRONGHOLD (nails)• CITIBANK (banking services)• NUTRASWEET (sweetner)
Category
• Descriptive• Suggestive• Descriptive• Descriptive• Descriptive• Arbitrary• Suggestive• Suggestive• Suggestive• Descriptive
![Page 17: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Categories of Marks
Less Protection More Protection
GenericDenotes generalclass of products
Unprotectible
Shredded Wheat,Aspirin, Thermos,Cellophane, Car,Computer
ArbitraryBears no relationto product
AutomaticallyProtectible
DescriptiveDescribes somecharacteristic/quality
Protectible ifsecondary meaning
SuggestiveSuggests somecharacteristic
AutomaticallyProtectible
![Page 18: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Sec. 1052 (Lanham Act sec. 2). Trademarks Registrable on Principal Register; Concurrent Registration
No trademark by which the goods of the applicant may be distinguished from the goods of others shall be refused registration on the principal register on account of its nature unless it —
(e) Consists of a mark which (1) when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant is merely descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive of them . . . .
![Page 19: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Statutory basis: registration of descriptive marks
Except as expressly excluded in paragraphs . . . of this section, nothing in this chapter shall prevent the registration of a mark used by the applicant which has become distinctive of the applicant’s goods in commerce.
-- Lanham Act sec. 2f, 15 USC 1052(f)
![Page 20: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Secondary Meaning
• Definition: primary significance of the term in the minds of the consuming public is not the product but the producer
• Factors– Consumer surveys– Amount and volume of advertising– Volume of sales– Length and manner of use– Direct consumer testimony
![Page 21: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Trade Dress & Product Design
Trade Dress Product Design
![Page 22: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Trade Dress Protection
Lanham Act § 43(a)
Any person who shall affix, apply, … or use in connection with any goods or services … a false designation of origin … , and shall cause such goods or services to enter into commerce … shall be liable to a civil action … .
![Page 23: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Two Pesos v. Taco Cabana505 U.S. 763 (1992)
Taco Cabana Trade Dress
![Page 24: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Two Pesos (cont’d)
• Findings of the District Court– Taco Cabana has an identifiable trade dress– The trade dress is non-functional– The trade dress is inherently distinctive– The trade dress has not acquired secondary
meaning
![Page 25: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Sec. 1114 (Lanham Act sec. 32). Remedies; Infringement; Innocent Infringement by Printers and PublishersSec. 1114 (Lanham Act sec. 32)
(1) Any person who shall, without the consent of the registrant —
(a) use in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark . . . .
![Page 26: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Sec. 1125 (Lanham Act sec. 43). (1) Any person who, on or in connection with
any goods or services, or any container for goods, uses in commerce any word, term, name, symbol, or device, … or any false designation of origin, … which —
(A) is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of such person with another person, or as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of his or her goods ... Shall be liable
![Page 27: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
No reason to differentiate …
• P 665 “There is no persuasive reason . . .”
![Page 28: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Inherently Distinctive?
![Page 29: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Inherently Distinctive?
![Page 30: Establishing Protection](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062501/56815c9b550346895dcaa581/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Jeans Pocket design – no secondary meaning proven