Download - European Union Decision Making
![Page 1: European Union Decision Making](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/554d5cecb4c905f6388b4e5c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
EU policy processes
• Does the EU have too many policy-making processes? Why? Do you know any?
• In what main ways do EU policy making processes differ
from national processes?
• What two elements contribute to differentiate EU policy
processes?
• What are the differences between supranationalism and inter-governmentalism?
![Page 2: European Union Decision Making](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/554d5cecb4c905f6388b4e5c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: European Union Decision Making](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/554d5cecb4c905f6388b4e5c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: European Union Decision Making](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/554d5cecb4c905f6388b4e5c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: European Union Decision Making](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/554d5cecb4c905f6388b4e5c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: European Union Decision Making](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/554d5cecb4c905f6388b4e5c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
![Page 7: European Union Decision Making](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/554d5cecb4c905f6388b4e5c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
EU policy cycle?
• Is it decision-making homogeneous across policy areas?
• What are the main phases in a policy cycle?
• What are the main actors involved in each one?
![Page 8: European Union Decision Making](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/554d5cecb4c905f6388b4e5c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
![Page 9: European Union Decision Making](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/554d5cecb4c905f6388b4e5c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
![Page 10: European Union Decision Making](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/554d5cecb4c905f6388b4e5c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Initiation phase
• Consultation process:• Expert groups, public consultations.
• Green papers, White papers.• National representatives, members of EP committees.
• Impact assessment:• Economic, social and environmental effects.
• Cost&benefit assessment of different policyoption.
• Inter-service consultation.• Draft proposal.• Adoption by the College.
![Page 11: European Union Decision Making](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/554d5cecb4c905f6388b4e5c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Decision making in the Commission
![Page 12: European Union Decision Making](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/554d5cecb4c905f6388b4e5c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
![Page 13: European Union Decision Making](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/554d5cecb4c905f6388b4e5c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Strategic planning in the Commission
• State of the European Union:• Strategic objectives and priorities.
• Commission work programme:• Dialogue with the EP.
• DG’s management plans:• Objectives and indicators for reporting and
monitoring.
• Impact assessments:• Economic, social and environment al effects.
• Annual Activity Report and synthesis report .
![Page 14: European Union Decision Making](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/554d5cecb4c905f6388b4e5c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
![Page 15: European Union Decision Making](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/554d5cecb4c905f6388b4e5c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Subsidiarity and proportionality
• Principle of subsidiarity:• In areas which do not fall within its exclusive
competence, the Union shall act only if and in so far as the objectives of the proposed action cannot be sufficiently achieved by the MSs but can rather by reason of the scale or effects of the proposed action, be better achieved at Union level.
• Principle of proportionality:• Thee content and form of Union action shall not exceed what
is necessary to achieve the objectives of the Treaties.
![Page 16: European Union Decision Making](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/554d5cecb4c905f6388b4e5c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Early warning mechanism
‘Yellow card’ procedure ‘Orange card’ procedure
Only for ordinary legislative procedure
Threshold A number of negative opinions representing at least 1/3 of the total votes (2 votes per MS).
*1/4 for legislative acts concerning thearea of freedom, security and justice.
A number of negative opinions representing at least a simple majority of the votes allocated to national parliaments.
Effect The initiating EU institution (usually the Commission) must review the proposal. It can maintain, amend or withdraw it.
The European Commission (EC) must review the proposal, and it can maintain, amend, or withdraw it.
If the EC decides to maintain the proposal, it has to justify its decision, and both the Council and the EP can reject it before the end of the first reading should they find it incompatible with the subsidiarity principle.
![Page 17: European Union Decision Making](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/554d5cecb4c905f6388b4e5c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Adoption phase
• Highly politicised.
• Decision-making might take many forms:
• Supranationalism vs inter-governmentalism.
• Depending on policy (but changes over time).
• More powers to the EU, but in different forms.
• Increasing differentiation
• Decision-makers vary across policy process modes:
• Community method, intensive transgovernmentalism,supranational centralisation, new modes of governance.
![Page 18: European Union Decision Making](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/554d5cecb4c905f6388b4e5c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Decision making in the Council
• Committees and working groups.
http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/13/st05/st05581.en13.pdf
• COREPER I and II
• Political and Security Committee / Special Committee on
Agriculture.
• Council of Ministers:
• A single body, different configurations.
• Ministerial meetings:
• Points A and B.
• Chairs
![Page 19: European Union Decision Making](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/554d5cecb4c905f6388b4e5c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
QMV in the Council
• As from 1 July 2013:
• 260 out of 352, cast by at least 15 MSs out of 28.
• A MS may request that it represents 62% of the population.
• As from 1 November 2014:
• At least 55% of the member states (i.e. 16 member states).
• Representing at least 65% of the EU population
![Page 20: European Union Decision Making](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/554d5cecb4c905f6388b4e5c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Allocation of votes in the Council
Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom 29 votes
Spain, Poland 27
votes Romania 14
votes
Netherlands 13 votes
Belgium, Czech Republic, Greece, Hungary, Portugal
12 votes Austria, Sweden, Bulgaria 10 votes
Denmark, Croatia, Ireland, Lithuania, Slovakia, Finland
7 votes Cyprus, Estonia, Latvia, Luxembourg, Slovenia
4 votes
Malta 3 votes
![Page 21: European Union Decision Making](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/554d5cecb4c905f6388b4e5c/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Decision making in the EP
• Sectoral committees:
• Chair, rapporteur, shadow rapporteur.
• Lead committee, joint/associated committees.
• Plenary sessions:
• Brussels / Strasbourg.
• Voting majorities (votes cast / component members).
• Voting systems:
• Shadow of hands (electronic).
• Roll call votes.• Secret ballots.
![Page 22: European Union Decision Making](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/554d5cecb4c905f6388b4e5c/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Ordinary Legislative Procedure
![Page 23: European Union Decision Making](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/554d5cecb4c905f6388b4e5c/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
![Page 24: European Union Decision Making](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/554d5cecb4c905f6388b4e5c/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Trilogues: Composition
• European Parliament:
• Committee Chair and Rapporteur• Conciliation: + Vice-President for Conciliation.
• Council:• Ambassador or Deputy (rotating Presidency)• Conciliation: + Minister or Deputy
• European Commission:• Director General and Secretariat General
(LS+CON).• Conciliation: + Commmissioner.
![Page 25: European Union Decision Making](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/554d5cecb4c905f6388b4e5c/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
![Page 26: European Union Decision Making](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/554d5cecb4c905f6388b4e5c/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Implementation by MSs
• Transposition:
• Problems in MSs that opposed the act, have very different national legislation or lack legislative/administrative capacity.
• Differences in the transposing acts if wide leeway is given.
• Commission oversees the correct transposition and can bring action in the CJEU.
• Application:
• By national/regional/local authorities in MSs.
• Differences due to resources & capacities, different legal traditions, the desire to protect national interests, wide leeway and
![Page 27: European Union Decision Making](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/554d5cecb4c905f6388b4e5c/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Implementation by the Commission
Delegated Acts (art. 290 TFUE):
• Delegated powers clearly conferred by legislative act (object, scope, content and duration).
• General application to supplement or amend certain non-
essential elements of the legislative act.
• EP or Council can revoke delegation and express
objections to particular acts:
• EP majority of its component members;
• Council by a qualified majority.
![Page 28: European Union Decision Making](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062513/554d5cecb4c905f6388b4e5c/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Implementation by the Commission
Implementing Acts (art. 291 TFUE / Regulation 182/2011):
• Where uniform conditions for implementing EU legal acts are needed.
• Control by MSs, comitology committees:
• Advisory procedure: committee delivers an opinion that the Commission has to consider but it is not binding.
• Examination procedure: if the committee delivers a negative opinion the Commission can revise it or submit it to the Appeal Committee.
• Scrutiny by EP and Council.