EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE ANALYSIS 5th General Meeting
NULES, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03-04 July 2019 Project 585603-EPP-1-2017-1-DE-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP (2017 –
3299/001-001) / TOPAS
From theoretical-oriented to practical education in agrarian
studies Editor(s): Oleh Pasko
Responsible
Partner: Sumy National Agrarian University (SNAU), Sumy, Ukraine
Status-Version: FINAL VERSION
Date (dd/mm/year): 25/07/2019
Dissemination
Level Restricted to other program participants (including the
Commission Services)
The project progress surveys are one of the key tools to assure the
project's quality and success. Conducted regularly by the QM team, they
enable evaluation TOPAS progress and delivery by gathering open and
anonymous opinions of project partners (the personal data is optional). The
surveys are very important for the results to give the Executive Management
Unit, TOPAS Steering Committee and the Consortium an early indication of
problems and risks and of what could be done to address them.
TOPAS partners took part in the fifth project survey in early Jule 2019
straight after the meeting by the means of online platform. The results are
shown below.
From Theoretical-Oriented to Practical education in Agrarian Studies
EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE ANALYSIS,
Meeting 5, NULES, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03-04 July 2019
2
Did you find the meeting for your institution (knowledge of the
project, including the methodology, results, and activities)?
To what extent were the questions connected with the project
explained during the meeting?
From Theoretical-Oriented to Practical education in Agrarian Studies
EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE ANALYSIS,
Meeting 5, NULES, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03-04 July 2019
3
To what extent did the time dedicated to the questions connected
with the project satisfy your expectations during the discussions?
To what extent did the objectives of the meeting satisfy your
expectations?
From Theoretical-Oriented to Practical education in Agrarian Studies
EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE ANALYSIS,
Meeting 5, NULES, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03-04 July 2019
4
Of the information presented on the meeting, how much is usable
to you?
To what extent did the meeting make you think?
From Theoretical-Oriented to Practical education in Agrarian Studies
EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE ANALYSIS,
Meeting 5, NULES, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03-04 July 2019
5
To what extent did the meeting allow you to identify the role of
your institution in the project?
Did the meeting allow you to exchange opinions and experience
with the partners?
From Theoretical-Oriented to Practical education in Agrarian Studies
EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE ANALYSIS,
Meeting 5, NULES, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03-04 July 2019
6
How do you mark the organisation and the facilities at your
disposal during the meeting?
Did you receive the documentation about the meeting in due time?
From Theoretical-Oriented to Practical education in Agrarian Studies
EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE ANALYSIS,
Meeting 5, NULES, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03-04 July 2019
7
How would you assess the quality of the documentation?
How would you evaluate the location of the meeting?
From Theoretical-Oriented to Practical education in Agrarian Studies
EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE ANALYSIS,
Meeting 5, NULES, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03-04 July 2019
8
How would you evaluate the social aspects of the meeting?
How would you generally evaluate the meeting?
From Theoretical-Oriented to Practical education in Agrarian Studies
EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE ANALYSIS,
Meeting 5, NULES, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03-04 July 2019
9
OPEN QUESTIONS
Which aspects of the meeting do you consider the best?1
Intensive, effective work in working groups * 4
"world cafe" workgroups and their results, presentations on
progress at NULES
Discussions, informal talks and communication
Friendly, pleasant atmosphere of evening meetings
hand book
handbook content
ICT tool elaboration issues
Perfect organisation
Strong cooperation among participants and common workshops.
Subject of the disscusion
Team live discussion, hardworking and productivity, location (host
institution has done its best for our convenience)
Team work, general arrangement, amazing location
The opportunities to discuss progression of the project
workshops
Which aspects of the meeting do you consider the worst?2
None*12
Long working sessions
Difficult to answer
I have no comments
Too busy schedule
1 The author’s orthography and parlance have been left intact
2 The author’s orthography and parlance have been left intact
From Theoretical-Oriented to Practical education in Agrarian Studies
EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE ANALYSIS,
Meeting 5, NULES, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03-04 July 2019
10
What are THREE NEW THINGS you have discovered for yourself in
the meeting? (please reply as this 1)_;2)_;3)_)3
4 respondents returned no answer
Brain storm method, 2) Content of TOPAS Handbook,
farma data collection methods 2) mobile application 3) web
application
Final book consistency 2) Kahoot 3) Google classroom
handbook content; 2)future plans; 3) MOODLE platform
I can do world cafe discussions; 2) We are all very productive; 3)
My leadership skills are improving
Moodle 2) Ways of students involvement 3) Active usage of
modern software
New friends, 2) New aproaches, 3) New viewes
poll everywhere app; 2) John Nix Farm Management Pocketbook;
strength of committment by host 2) improved feed-back of
partners to task list and deadlines 3) need for deeper
understanding of data management systems by some partners
the new Erasmus possibilities 2) Socrative 3) Kahoot
1)SWOT analysis by TOPAS team, appraisal, suggestions for next
steps; 2) Farm data management and ICT set-up at NULES; 3)Panel
discussions
1. Clarifying the content of the handbook, 2. The method of
financing the "Tropentag - conference"
Kahoot
3 The author’s orthography and parlance have been left intact
From Theoretical-Oriented to Practical education in Agrarian Studies
EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE ANALYSIS,
Meeting 5, NULES, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03-04 July 2019
11
Which characteristics of the meeting contributed to its
effectiveness?
3 respondents returned no answer
Hard job, full of work
Subdivision in workgroups, less presentations, more results
developped during meeting
Classroom, active involvement
Work hard, play hard
Common discussion and work shops
Round table discussions
Intensive work in working groups
informal talks and communication
Depth of issues of disscusions
Content, workshops, team work
Professional and dedicated work of most of participants.
The delegates' willingness to work and collaborate
Experienced staff
What advice would you give to the partner institutions so as to
improve the results of the next meetings?4
None or returned no answer*5
Actually, I do not have any special comments, though, the
university - meeting organizer, could organize some transfer from
and to the airport
Allow for time to digest the work done during the day.
Difficult to answer
Focus on the results you would like to achieve in the end of the
meeting
4 The author’s orthography and parlance have been left intact
From Theoretical-Oriented to Practical education in Agrarian Studies
EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE ANALYSIS,
Meeting 5, NULES, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03-04 July 2019
12
I think if the employers of production will involve in the next
meetings it will be more effectively
More team work
Provide materials for discussion in advance or at least keywords,
Planning an excursion to the city would be a bonus for everyone,
as cultural enrichment is also part of the project
Set list of raporteurs for sessions at the beginning of the sessions
Short seightseeing tour as a break in very intensive TOPAS work.
Spend more time on preparatory works beforehand.
Take into account the date of work
July 3th 2019 Heroiv Oborony Str.15 building 3, Kyiv, Ukraine