Experience in Final Reportingfrom INTERREG III B “Castle
Tomorrow” project perspective
Marika Rudzite, Project coordinator(Head of Investment and Development Dep. of Livani District Council,
LATVIA)
Riga, 27th September, 2007
Overview
Short introduction to “Castles of Tomorrow” project
PART 1: Experiences in preparation of Final ACTIVITY Report and its Annexes (main challenges concerning the reporting requirements) What have we learned? Suggestions and proposals how to cope with the challenges in Final Activity Reporting
PART 2: Experiences in preparation of Final FINANCIAL Report (main challenges concerning the reporting requirements) What have we learned? Suggestions and proposals how to cope with the challenges in Final Financial Reporting
“Castle Tomorrow” projectFull title: “Development of Castles and Manor Houses of the Baltic Sea Region as Cultural Heritage Objects and Town Centres in Rural Areas”Partners: 20 partners from 8 BSR countriesAim: to promote, safeguard, preserve and develop castles and manors as cultural heritage objects (c.h.o.) and town-centres of rural areas in the BSR by providing support and increase the capacity of c.h.o. owners, managers and operators
“Castle Tomorrow” project
Activities: Research (focus on best sustainable management practices in c.h.o.), Networking (knowledge transfer, development of book on Industry Best Case practice in the BSR), Modelling (preparation of c.h.o. Development Model as a tool for identification and planning of priority actions needed in c.h.o.), Capacity building (training courses, study tours, “Handbook of Tools for Sustainable Heritage Conservation”), Pilot studies and minor investment projects, Promotion and DisseminationProject duration: 24 months (February 2005 – January 2007)Project budget: EUR 794 023 (incl. ERDF funding of EUR 522 914,75 and national co-financing of EUR 271 108,25)
PART 1
Experience in preparation of Final ACTIVITY Report
and its Annexes from “Castle Tomorrow” project
perspective
Main challenges concerning Activity reporting requirements
Capacity of all partners in activity reporting procedure (delays in spite of Partnership Agreements, etc.)Evaluation of ANY major activity performedSimple misunderstandings (due to the language use or lack of attention)Too short descriptions of implemented activities (need for clarifications and additional information later)Copies of relevant outputsInformation and publicity requirements
Preparation of Final ACTIVITY Report and its Annexes
Sometimes unclear (confusing) layout of the required information in the Activity reporting forms, e.g. Annex A Section II (Results)
Preparation of Final ACTIVITY Report and its Annexes
Impression that information required in Annex A and Annex A 2.3. seems to repeat itself (e.g.Results)
Suggestions and proposals to other projects (1)
Set and define your target group (s) and concrete result indicators in the begining of the project
Read the Final Activity report forms in the beginning of the project (check other information on programme website) – you'll get good ideas!
Read carefully the introductory page of Progress report (“Dear lead Partner, Please take notice of the following when filling in the activity report” and “Output indicators”)
Read carefully and make sure you understand the titles of the Activity report sections
Let your project PR specialist write “Summary description of the project” and “Achievements of the project so far”
Suggestions and proposals to other projects (2)
Meet and discuss
Clearly divide tasks and responsibilities among partners
Sign Partnership Agreements and keep to them
In the beginning of the project organise a working session for PP on reporting procedure and requirements
Attend seminars and conferences organised by Interreg JS (e.g. Communication Seminar)
Write articles and press releases
Have your camera with you and make photos
Create a clear system used by all partners for evaluation of activities
Communicate with Interreg JS
Suggestions and proposals to Interreg JS
To combine both Annexes in oneTo provide a template for Final activity report form to be used by PPs and be submited to LP To include not only quantitave but also qualitative indicators (Annex 2.3.)
PART 2
Experience in preparation of Final FINANCIAL Report from “Castle Tomorrow”
project perspective
Main challenges concerning Financial reporting requirements
Capacity of all partners in financial reporting procedure (delays in spite of Partnership Agreements, etc.)Underspending (lack of financial resources for pre-financing the project, long time of reimbursements)Distribution of the expenditures among BLs (e.g. “Meetings and Dissemination” and “External Expertise”Printing out the documents (Financial Report part FR V, e.g. expenditures by PPs/MSs)Formulas (e.g. difference of 1 cent due to approximation formulas)Eligibility of expenditures (e.g. costs originally listed as “Others” in AF)
Main challenges concerning Financial reporting requirements
Some partners' Financial reporting forms submitted to auditors (e.g. centralized auditing system in LV) and then to LP differ from other PPs' reporting forms – difficulties in drafting the consolidated progress reportStandard Confirmation by independent auditorInterreg co-financing rateDeadlines!!! (in spite of Partnership Agreements!)LP being “tolerant, understanding and human” OR being “strict and cruel”
Suggestions and proposalsto other projects
Involve PPs in preparation of the project budget in its very beginningClearly divide tasks and responsibilities among partnersCheck your spending status every month + plan + review the planned expendituresAll PPs use the same reporting forms to ease the data summary and matching in the consolidated report Find a “way of punishment” for those PPs who are late with submision of the reportsCommunicate among yourself and with Interreg JS
GOOD LUCK!
Thank you!
Marika RudzīteProject coordinator
Livani District Council
Domes iela 3, LivaniLV-5316, LATVIA
Phone: +371 65307807Fax: +371 65307816
Mob: +371 29 443621e-mail: [email protected]
Skype: marikarudzite