A-251
Appendix 17
D
amag
ed B
reak
wat
er (1
)
Con
cret
e St
air
Lan
ding
(no
wat
er a
t low
tide
) (2)
Sh
allo
w b
asin
at l
ow ti
de (3
)
Fig.
17.
15
Cal
aban
ga F
ish
Port
(3)
(2)
(1)
A-252
Appendix 17
Pr
esen
t con
ditio
n of
Jet
ty c
onst
ruct
ed 2
004
as fe
eder
por
ts (1
)
Con
cret
e St
air
Lan
ding
(2)
Te
mpo
rary
Mar
ket H
all t
o be
reh
ab. (
3)
Fig.
17.
16
Pasa
cao
Fish
Por
t
(3)
(2)
(1)
A-253
Appendix 17
Pr
esen
t con
ditio
n of
cau
sew
ay (1
)
Prop
osed
bac
k up
are
a fo
r fis
h po
rt fa
cilit
ies (
2)
A
cces
s Roa
d (3
)
Fig.
17.
17
Bal
atan
Fis
h Po
rt
(3)
(2)
(1)
A-254
Appendix 17
Pr
opos
ed F
ish
Port
are
a al
ong
shor
e lin
e (1
)
Prop
osed
Fis
h Po
rt a
rea
alon
g sh
ore
line
(2)
A
cces
s Roa
d (3
)
Fig.
17.
18
Oas
Fis
h Po
rt
(3)
(2) (1
)
A-255
Appendix 17
Pr
esen
t con
ditio
n of
cau
sew
ay to
be
rais
ed u
p (1
)
Fish
cag
es in
Tag
abur
i bay
(2)
Ti
p of
cau
sew
ay to
be
deve
lope
d fis
h po
rt fa
cilit
ies
(3)
Fig.
17.
19
Sta.
Cru
z Fi
sh P
ort
(3)
(2)
(1)
A-256
Appendix 17
Fi
sh L
andi
ng F
acili
ty to
be
reha
b. (1
)
Tem
pora
ry M
arke
t Hal
l to
be r
ehab
. (2)
A
cces
s Roa
d (3
)
Fig.
17.2
0 P
anab
o Fi
sh P
ort
(3)
(2)
(1)
A-257
Appendix 17
Pr
esen
t con
ditio
n of
new
Jet
ty (1
)
Exi
stin
g Sh
oe L
ine
area
(2)
Fig.
17.
21
Mat
i Fis
h Po
rt
(2)
(1)
A-258
Appendix 18
App
endi
x 18
. PD
M
PR
OJE
CT
TITL
E : N
atio
nwid
e Fi
sh P
ort P
roje
ct (P
acka
ge II
I)TA
RG
ET G
RO
UP
: Fish
por
t use
rs (f
isher
s, fis
h br
oker
s/w
hole
sale
rs/tr
ader
s,fish
pro
ceso
rs, e
tc.)
DA
TE :
15 Ju
ne 2
010
PER
IOD
: 20
12 -
2018
TAR
GET
AR
EA :
6 R
egio
nal F
ish P
orts
(Ilo
ilo, S
ual,
Luce
na, C
amal
igan
, Dav
ao. B
islig
) and
V
ERSI
ON
: 00
1-N
FPP(
III)
5
Mun
icip
al F
ish P
orts
(Con
cepc
ion,
Sub
ic, A
timon
an, C
alab
anga
, Sta
. Cru
z)
NA
RR
ATI
VE
SUM
MA
RY
IND
ICA
TOR
SM
EAN
S O
F V
ERIF
ICA
TIO
NIM
PORT
AN
T A
SSU
MPT
ION
S<
OV
ERA
LL G
OA
L >
Fish
ery-
rela
ted
busin
ess a
nd j
ob o
ppor
tuni
ties a
re c
reat
ed in
and
arou
nd th
e fis
h po
rts.
1. N
umbe
r of b
usin
ess e
nter
prise
s est
ablsi
hed
2. N
umbe
r of w
orke
rs in
and
aro
und
fish
ports
- List
of f
isher
y-re
late
d en
terp
rises
regi
ster
ed to
PFD
A a
nd L
GU
- Int
ervi
ew to
por
t use
rs<
PRO
JEC
T PU
RPO
SE >
Fish
es a
re e
ffect
ivel
y ut
ilize
d w
ith th
e in
crea
se o
f val
ue-a
dded
prod
ucts
and
redu
ctio
n of
pos
thar
vest
loss
.1.
Exp
ort v
alue
of f
ish p
roce
ssed
pro
duct
s2.
Des
tinat
ions
of e
xpor
t of f
ish p
roce
ssed
pro
duct
s3.
Ave
rage
who
lesa
le p
rice
of fr
esh
fsh
- Rec
ord
of e
xpor
t by
each
fish
pro
cess
or-
Stat
istic
al re
cord
at r
egio
nal f
ish p
orts
- On-
site
surv
ey o
f fish
pric
e at
mun
icip
alfis
h po
rts (i
n D
ecem
ber)
No
econ
omic
cris
is is
happ
ened
.
< O
UTP
UTS
>W
ith th
e im
prov
emen
t and
mod
erni
zatio
n of
faci
litie
s and
serv
ices
of f
ish p
orts
, th
e fo
llow
ing
outp
uts a
re o
btai
ned.
Fish
ery
reso
urce
s are
wel
l mai
ntai
ned
atcu
rren
t lev
el.
1. F
ishin
g bo
ats a
re m
ore
smoo
thly
moo
red
for u
nloa
ding
fish
at th
e la
ndin
g w
harf/
pier
.1.
Wai
ting
time
for m
oorin
g of
fish
ing
boat
s at p
eak
mon
th -
On-
site
surv
ey re
cord
at f
ish p
orts
(at
peak
mon
th)
2. M
ore
fish
are
unlo
aded
and
dist
ribut
ed fr
om p
roje
ct fi
shpo
rts.
2. F
ish u
nloa
ding
vol
ume
by sp
ecie
s- S
tatis
tical
reco
rd a
t reg
iona
l fish
por
ts- O
n-sit
e su
rvey
reco
rd a
t mun
icip
al fi
sh
3. M
ore
fishi
n g b
oats
use
the
proj
ect f
ish p
orts
.3.
Ave
rage
num
ber o
f fish
ing
boat
ent
ries
- Sta
tistic
al re
cord
at r
egio
nal f
ish p
orts
4. M
ore
ice
is pr
oduc
ed a
t Ilo
ilo, S
ual,
Cam
alig
an a
nd B
islig
FPC
s and
dist
ribut
ed to
the
mun
icip
al fi
sh p
orts
.4-
1. A
vera
ge d
aily
ice
prod
uctio
n vo
lum
e4-
2. A
vera
ge d
aily
ice
volu
me
dist
ribut
ed to
the
mun
icip
al fi
sh p
orts
- Sta
tistic
al re
cord
at r
egio
nal f
ish p
orts
5. P
roje
ct fi
sh p
ort f
acili
ties f
or le
ase
are
fully
use
d.5.
Lea
sing
rate
of m
arke
t hal
ls (b
ays)
, col
d/ch
illed
stor
a ge
room
s, H
AC
CP
fish
proc
essin
g un
its,
- Ope
ratio
nall
reco
rd a
t reg
iona
l fish
por
tsan
d m
unic
ipal
fish
por
ts6.
Fin
anci
al st
atus
of p
roje
ct fi
sh p
orts
are
impr
oved
.6.
Inco
me
and
expe
nditu
re o
f fish
por
ts- A
nnua
l fin
anci
al re
ports
of e
ach
fish
port
<
AC
TIV
ITIE
S >
1. S
elec
tion
of C
onsu
ltant
for E
ngin
eerin
g Se
rvic
es2.
Rev
iew
of F
/S a
nd D
etai
led
desig
n of
the
proj
ect
1. R
ehab
ilita
tion
and
cons
truct
ion
of 6
regi
onal
fish
ports
(Ilo
ilo, S
ual,
Luce
na, C
amal
igan
, Dav
ao,
[Phi
lippi
ne si
de]
1. L
and
acqu
isitio
n an
d sit
e cl
eara
nce
3. P
repa
ratio
n an
d m
anag
emen
t of t
ende
r for
sele
ctio
n of
cons
truct
ors/
supl
iers
4. S
u per
visio
n of
con
stru
ctio
n an
d pr
ocur
emen
t wor
k
2. R
ehab
ilita
tion
and
cons
truct
ion
of 5
mun
icip
al fi
shpo
rts (C
once
pcio
n, S
ubic
, Atim
onan
, Cal
aban
ga,
Sta.
Cru
z)
2. C
lear
ance
of a
ll ta
xes i
mpo
sed
in th
ePh
ilipp
ines
.
5. O
rient
atio
n fo
r ope
ratio
n an
d m
aint
enan
ce o
f pro
ject
faci
litie
3. E
ngin
eerin
g Se
rvic
es6.
Tec
hnic
al A
ssist
ance
(T/A
)4.
Des
patc
hmen
t of E
xper
ts6-
1 Pr
oof t
est f
or fi
sh p
roce
ssed
pro
duct
s for
loca
l mar
kets
4-1
Fish
Por
t Man
agem
ent 2
4 P/
M6-
2 Im
prov
emen
t of H
AC
CP
plan
ning
and
impl
emen
tatio
n4-
2 F
ish P
osth
arve
st T
echn
olog
y 20
P/M
6-3
Esta
blish
men
t of f
resh
fish
insp
ectio
n &
qua
lity
cont
rol s
yst4
-3 F
ish M
arke
ting
20 P
/M<
PREC
ON
DIT
ION
S >
6-4
Esta
blish
men
t of m
arke
t pric
e in
form
atio
n ne
twor
k sy
ste m
4-4
HA
CC
P/Q
ualit
y Co
ntro
l 20
P/M
6-5
Dem
onst
ratio
n to
priv
ate
ente
rpris
es fo
r fish
por
t util
izat
ion4
.5 P
ublic
aw
aren
ess/
Exte
nsio
n 20
P/M
6-6
Publ
ic a
war
enes
s for
diff
eren
ciat
ion
of fi
sh tr
eate
d at
fish
po5
. Cap
acity
Build
ing
of P
FDA
staf
f in
Japa
n 16
P/M
6. P
roje
ct M
anag
emen
t Offi
ce (P
MO
)
< IN
PUTS
>
Loan
Agr
eem
ent (
L/A
) is c
oncl
uded
as
sche
dule
d be
twee
n JI
CA
and
GO
P.
6-7
Gui
danc
e an
d as
sista
nce
for b
ette
r fish
por
t ope
ratio
n an
dm
anag
emen
t
3. O
bten
sion
of a
ll ne
cess
ary
perm
issio
nsfo
r im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e Pr
ojec
t.4.
Arr
ange
men
t of c
ount
er-b
udge
t (15
% o
fto
tal p
roje
ct c
ost)
Prop
osed
tech
nica
l ass
istan
ce (T
/A) i
sex
tend
ed a
s sch
edul
e.
A-259
Appendix 18
App
endi
x 19
. Rec
omm
ende
d A
ctio
n Pl
an
In
ord
er to
ach
ieve
sust
aina
ble
oper
atio
ns fo
r ea
ch fi
sh p
ort t
he fo
llow
ing
esse
ntia
l con
ditio
nssh
ould
be
fully
con
side
red:
(As p
er th
e FR
Cha
p 20
con
clus
ion
& R
ecom
men
datio
ns, P
age
2-17
7)R
ecom
men
ded
Act
ion
plan
for
Impl
emen
ting
agen
cyO
utpu
t (dr
aft)
Whe
n(r
ecom
men
ded
tim
ing)
1)Po
rt m
anag
emen
t sho
uld
serio
usly
con
sider
incr
easin
g th
e m
arke
t cha
rges
and
buy
er/s
elle
r fee
s bas
ed o
n1%
of t
he v
alue
of t
he v
olum
e of
fish
land
ed a
t the
fish
por
t. Th
e pr
evai
ling
fees
shou
ld b
e in
crem
enta
llyin
crea
sed
annu
ally
unt
il th
e re
com
men
ded
rate
s are
atta
ined
by
2025
at t
he la
test
;
(1) H
earin
g an
d di
scus
sions
will
be
cond
ucte
d fo
r the
por
t use
rs a
nd st
akeh
olde
rs b
efor
e an
d af
ter
com
men
cem
ent o
f the
impl
emen
tatio
n (c
onst
ruct
ion
wor
ks) s
tarte
d.(2
) Im
prov
emen
t of t
he fi
sh p
ort f
acili
ties a
nd se
rvic
es th
roug
h im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e pr
ojec
t.(3
) Im
prov
emen
t of t
he fi
sh q
ualit
y (fr
eshn
ess,
hygi
enic
con
ditio
ns, l
abor
ator
y te
stin
g, in
clud
ing
certi
ficat
ion
on th
e qu
ality
), se
rvic
es, r
eput
atio
n on
the
FPC
.(4
) Adv
ertis
ing
cam
paig
n/ p
ublic
rela
tions
on
the
impr
oved
faci
litie
s and
serv
ices
of F
P.(5
) Arr
ange
men
t for
por
t cha
rge/
rate
incr
ease
, prio
r to
the
com
plet
ion
of th
e pr
ojec
t fac
ilitie
s.(6
) Pro
visio
n of
rele
vant
rule
s and
regu
latio
ns to
ach
ieve
succ
eedi
ng a
nnua
l inc
reas
e of
cha
rge
rate
to a
chie
veth
e ta
rget
rate
of 1
% o
f fish
val
ue b
y th
e ye
ar 2
025
whi
ch w
ill b
e in
clud
ing
the
pric
e in
flatio
n.
*let
ter o
f int
ensio
n of
the
user
s*M
OU
/MO
A*R
ecor
d of
min
utes
of
disc
ussio
n*R
ecor
d of
adve
rtise
men
t
*Oct
201
0
*201
5*2
015
and
afte
r*2
015
and
afte
r
2)Fi
sh la
ndin
g fe
es a
nd tr
anss
hipm
ent f
ees m
ay b
e re
tain
ed a
t cur
rent
rate
s but
it is
reco
mm
ende
d th
at th
ese
be g
radu
ally
incr
ease
d at
reas
onab
le ra
tes m
utua
lly a
ccep
tabl
e to
the
port
man
agem
ent a
nd fi
shpr
oduc
ers.
This
is ju
stifi
able
bec
ause
of t
he su
bsta
ntia
l im
prov
emen
ts to
mad
e fo
r dev
elop
men
t of
esse
ntia
l por
t fac
ilitie
s for
val
ue a
ddin
g of
fish
pro
duct
s;
Sam
e as
abo
ve c
olum
n Sa
me
as a
bove
col
umn
Sam
e as
abov
e co
lum
n
3)Fo
r Ilo
ilo F
PC, e
lect
rical
cha
rge
mus
t be
redu
ced
by a
dopt
ing
sola
r pow
er g
ener
atio
n sy
stem
from
the
curr
ent r
ate
of P
hP11
.30/
kwh
to P
hp 8
.40/
kwh
to su
stai
n th
e op
erat
ion
of th
e re
frig
erat
ion
faci
litie
sw
hich
is th
e m
ajor
sour
ce o
f rev
enue
of t
he F
PC. T
his w
ill in
turn
mor
e en
trepr
eneu
rs to
relo
cate
to Il
oilo
FPC
bec
ause
of t
he lo
wer
pow
er ra
tes.
Base
d on
key
info
rman
ts, m
any
busin
ess h
ad to
relo
cate
out
side
Iloilo
City
to a
vail
of th
e lo
wer
pow
er c
ost;
1) T
he n
egot
iatio
n an
d co
nfirm
atio
n be
twee
n lo
cal p
ower
com
pany
(PEC
O) a
nd IF
PC w
ere
alre
ady
done
and
conf
irmat
ion
was
mad
e th
orou
gh th
e co
rres
pond
ence
with
PEC
O o
n M
arch
25,
201
0.2)
It is
ant
icip
ated
that
by
mea
ns o
f the
inte
rnat
iona
l sol
ar p
anel
pro
duce
rs e
ffort,
the
pric
e of
sola
r pan
els i
sdr
astic
ally
redu
cing
. Thi
s situ
atio
n is
enco
urag
ing
the
posit
ion
of so
lar p
ower
gen
erat
ion
syst
em.
* Le
tter o
f PEC
O o
nM
arch
25,
201
0*M
OA
*Pre
pare
d
*1st
Qtr.
Of
2012
4)Fo
r Sua
l FPC
, the
pro
duct
s of m
aric
ultu
re fi
sh-c
age
shou
ld b
e ha
ndle
d at
SFP
C w
ith fi
sh u
nloa
ding
rate
of P
eso
6.00
/tub
inst
ead
of p
rese
nt P
eso
2.80
/tub.
Clo
se c
oord
inat
ion
betw
een
priv
ate
sect
or, L
GU
and
PFD
A is
indi
spen
sabl
e.
1) P
FDA
will
con
duct
hea
ring
and
disc
ussio
n w
ith fi
sh c
age
oper
ator
s (po
rt us
ers)
and
Sua
l LG
U.
2) In
ord
er to
pro
mot
e th
e us
ers,
the
proj
ect c
ompo
nent
s, im
prov
emen
t of p
ort f
unct
ions
and
serv
ices
thro
ugh
the
proj
ect w
ill b
e ex
plai
ned
to th
e us
ers
3) R
evise
the
LGU
fish
por
t rel
ated
ord
inan
ce to
exp
edite
the
inco
min
g us
ers.
*let
ter o
f int
ensio
n of
the
user
s*M
OU
/MO
A*R
ecor
d of
min
utes
of
disc
ussio
n*R
ecor
d of
adve
rtise
men
t
*Oct
201
0*M
id 2
015
*201
5 an
daf
ter
*201
5 an
daf
ter
*201
65)
In B
islig
FPC
, Cam
alig
an F
PC, a
nd Il
oilo
FPC
, por
t man
agem
ent s
houl
d de
velo
p an
d im
plem
ent a
nag
gres
sive
mar
ketin
g pl
an/s
trate
gy to
ent
ice
pote
ntia
l ent
repr
eneu
rs to
relo
cate
and
inve
st in
thes
e po
rtco
mpl
exes
. Effe
ctiv
e m
arke
ting
of th
e po
rt fa
cilit
ies i
nclu
de th
e re
ntin
g ou
t raw
land
s tha
t is a
vaila
ble
for
com
mer
cial
use
to g
ener
ate
the
need
ed re
venu
es to
sust
ain
the
oper
atio
n of
the
com
plex
es;
1) M
arke
ting
plan
to p
rom
ote
FPC
use
rs a
nd p
roce
ssor
s.2)
Mar
ket s
urve
y3)
Clo
se c
omm
unic
atio
n w
ith p
oten
tial u
sers
.4)
App
oint
men
t of m
arke
ting
offic
er5)
Est
ablis
hmen
t of r
ules
and
bud
get o
n pr
omot
ion
activ
ity in
PFD
A
*Mar
ketin
g pl
an*L
ist o
f pot
entia
l use
rs*2
012
*201
0
6)Te
chni
cal
assis
tanc
eon
port
man
agem
ent
isde
emed
criti
cal
for
stre
ngth
enin
gth
eca
paci
tyof
PFD
Ast
affs
and
conc
erne
dag
enci
essu
chas
BFA
Rin
oper
atin
g,m
aint
aini
ngan
dm
anag
ing
the
prop
osed
valu
e-ad
ding
and
labo
rato
ryfa
cilit
ies.
Inth
isre
gard
,ea
chpo
rtsh
ould
(prio
rto
com
men
cem
ent
ofPr
ojec
top
erat
ion)
orga
nize
the
staf
f/per
sonn
elto
betra
ined
unde
rth
ete
chni
cal
assis
tanc
e.A
syst
eman
dpr
ogra
mof
ince
ntiv
esan
dre
war
d(e
.g.,
prom
otio
nan
dpr
ovid
ing
com
petit
ive
sala
ries)
mus
tbe
deve
lope
dto
mai
ntai
nth
ose
who
have
been
train
edfr
omle
avin
gth
eco
mpl
exto
seek
bette
rop
portu
nitie
s.Th
issy
stem
of i
ncen
tives
/rew
ards
mus
t be
com
petit
ive
to th
e ex
tent
pos
sible
; and
*As f
or c
apac
ity b
uild
ing
and
tech
nolo
gy tr
ansf
er th
roug
h T/
A, r
efer
to re
leva
nt se
ctio
ns o
f FR
*PFD
A w
ill e
stab
lish
the
rew
ard
syst
em fo
r tho
se w
ho h
ave
skill
s kno
wle
dge
expe
rienc
e an
d tit
les d
epen
d on
the
nece
ssity
for t
he fi
sh p
ort o
pera
tion
man
agem
ent a
nd m
aint
enan
ce.
*201
4
7)A
sth
ein
vest
men
tson
valu
e-ad
ding
faci
litie
sto
bein
stal
led
for
the
regi
onal
fish
ports
are
cons
ider
ably
high
,and
cons
ider
ing
that
the
faci
litie
swill
beth
em
ajor
ofth
eco
mpl
exes
,por
tman
agem
ents
houl
dca
rry
out
O&
Min
clud
ing
mai
nten
ance
whe
neve
rne
cess
ary
onre
gula
rba
sis.
Brea
kdow
nsbr
ough
tab
out
byin
suffi
cien
tfun
dsan
dla
teac
tion
will
certa
inly
bede
trim
enta
lto
the
sust
aina
bilit
yof
oper
atio
nsdu
eto
loss
inre
venu
eac
crui
ngfr
omth
eno
nop
erat
ion
ofth
efa
cilit
ies.
This
will
adve
rsel
yaf
fect
port
finan
cial
perf
orm
ance
. The
fund
s for
rene
wal
of d
epre
ciat
ed m
achi
nery
/faci
lity
will
also
be
requ
ired
* Es
tabl
ishm
ent o
f rul
es a
nd g
uide
lines
on
the
mai
nten
ance
of t
he m
achi
nerie
s and
faci
litie
s.*
Prov
ision
of i
nter
nal b
udge
t allo
catio
n sy
stem
of P
FDA
* Es
tabl
ishm
ent o
f cor
pora
te p
rofit
rese
rvat
ion
syst
em a
nd ru
les.
*Bud
get a
lloca
tion
syst
em*e
stab
lishm
ent o
f rul
esan
d re
gula
tion
*Dra
ft 20
12,
take
effe
ct20
16*D
raft
2012
,ta
ke e
ffect
2016
8)Th
ees
tabl
ishm
ento
fPM
O(P
roje
ctM
anag
emen
tOffi
ce)o
fPFD
Ais
esse
ntia
lfor
the
impl
emen
tatio
nof
the
Proj
ect.
* PF
DA
will
est
ablis
h an
d or
gani
ze P
MO
(Pro
ject
Man
agem
ent O
ffice
) det
ache
d di
rect
ly to
the
Offi
ce o
fG
M (G
ener
al M
anag
er)
*The
rele
vant
bud
get f
or th
e PM
O w
ill b
e se
cure
d pr
ior t
o pr
ojec
t im
plem
enta
tion
*Bud
get a
rran
gem
ent
*Mid
201
3
Appendix 19
Appendix 20
A-260
Appendix 20. Details of T/A Component
Table20. 1 Details of T/ A Component (Fish Port management) Project Technical Assistance for Nationwide Fish Port Project (III) T/A Component Fish Port Management (Soft-component of Japanese Yen Loan) Period 2 years(April 2016 – March 2018) Target Area / Beneficiary Existing five (5) regional fish ports (Iloilo, Sual, Lucena, Camaligan and Davao)
and Bislig fish port/ PFDA, fish cage operators, boat operators, and fish processors
Executing Agency PFDA Cooperating Agency Background and Objectives: Technical assistance (T/ A) aims for the improvement of the operation and maintenance capacity of the existing five (5) regional fish ports (Iloilo, Sual, Lucena, Camaligan and Davao) and the elaboration will be reflected to the Bislig fish port, newly construction. The super goal of the T/ A is that PFDA fish ports are soundly operation & managed, and it will be achieved not only improvement and renovation of facilities but also enhancement of quality of fish port service. To achieve the super goal of the T/A, objective of this component is to improve fish port operation & maintenance. As a result of implementation of this component, the facilities improved and renovated in the project will be utilized efficiently. Project Purpose Super Goal: Improvement of fish port operation & management Project Purpose: 1. Improvement of port operation and maintenance system 2. Promotion for fish port utilization
Output: 1. Fish port operation and maintenance system will be
established, revised, accepted by the stakeholders and implemented (including rues & regulations, port utilization charge/ fees, and organization structures)
2. Project facilities are effectively utilized as projected with increase of number of lessees.
Year Activities Output 1 2 3 4
1. Improvement of port operation and maintenance systems
1.1 Organization structures 1.2 Fish port operation & management
system 1.3 Port facility maintenance system
1) Operational rules & regulations 2) Port charge/fee schedule, 3) Stakeholders workshop report 4) Maintenance schedule 5) Organizational diagram
---------
---
---
--------- --- -----
--
2. Assistance in promotion for fish port utilization
2.1 Demonstrate and extend the merits to use the modernized market hall to fish producers and traders
2.2 Encourage fish cage operators to use fish ports
2.3 Encourage boat operators to use fish ports2.4 Encourage fish processors to use fish
ports
1) Facilities utilization ratio to operation plan
2) Number and scale of fishing boats entries
3) Number of fish processors (lessees)
4) Fish unloading & handling volume
5) Boat repair record
--
--
--
--
--
Input 【Japanese side】 Personnel: Expert of Fish Port Operation & Management (24 P/M) 【Philippine side】 Personnel: Port Managers (Iloilo, Sual and Lucena) Facilities & Equipment to be provided: Office space and office equipment Points to be considered • To promote understanding of operation and management of fish port, OJT will be conducted. • The activities of this component will be programmed with the schedule of the construction works for
coordination to ensure successful implementation.
Appendix 20
A-261
Table 20.2 Details of T/ A Component (Development & Extension of Fish Processing Technology) Project Technical Assistance for Nationwide Fish Port Project (III) T/A Component Development & Extension of Fish Processing Technology Period 2 years(April 2011 – March 2013) Target Area / Beneficiary Iloilo, Lucena, Sual /Existing Fish Processors Executing Agency PFDA Cooperating Agency BFAR Background and Objectives Dominant fish species unloaded are consisted of small pelagics (sardines, juvenile of eastern little tuna, etc.) in Iloilo and Lucena areas and skipjack in Sual area (west coast of Luzon Island). The catch volume of these species largely fluctuates by seasons. Certain volume of fish cannot be treated and/or sold causing the drop of fish freshness, and some portion of these surplus fish are reported to be disposed in some ports. Furthermore, no fish processing methods other than traditional methods such as drying, salting and smoking. In these points of view, the most of postharvest loss (both physical and economic) might be caused in small pelagics and skipjack having large volume of catch. The proposed technical assistance is aimed to develop and extend new fish processing technologies as one of the measures for effective utilization of the abundantly caught fishes. Project Purpose Super Goal With development of new fish processed products, the abundantly caught fishes (sardine, eastern little tuna, and skipjack) are effectively utilized. Project Purpose The fish processed products which are acceptable by local markets are developed.
Output 1. The consumer’s demand and taste for fish processed
products in the target areas are identified. 2. At least 3 kinds of fish processed products
acceptable by local markets are developed. 3. Small and medium-scale fish processors in target
areas tackle on processing of the developed products.
Year Activities Output 1 2 3 4
1. Market research 1.1 Demand survey for skipjack products in the
northern Luzon and Manila 1.2 Demand survey for products of small pelagics in
Iloilo and Manila 2. Development of new fish processed products
2.1 Experimental fish processing (skipjack, small pelagics)
2.2 Quality and sanitary inspection of products 2.3 Sales promotion of products (Experimental sales)
3. Enlightening and extension of processing techniques to local fish processors 3.1 Extension of processing technique to local fish
processors 3.2 Enlightening to consumers
Survey report Survey report Recipe for fish processing Inspection record Label, package Extension record, processed volume HP, pamphlets
-- --
--
-- --
- - - ---- ----
Input 【Japanese side】 Personnel: Fish processing expert (20 p/m), Equipment: Fish processing equipment (US$30,000) 【Philippine side】 Personnel: PFDA: Port managers (3), Officer in charge of marketing (3) NFRDI/BFAR: Researcher on fish processing (1) Facilities: Existing fish port facilities (for fish processing), BFAR’s fish processing/inspection laboratories, Office space with office equipment Points to be considered 1. Demand survey is conducted to identify the distribution status of both fresh fish and processed products of the
target species and the taste of local consumers by questionnaires, interview and observation. 2. Experimental fish processing and inspection are conducted by using the existing BFAR’s fish processing
laboratory (Region-V) and fish inspection laboratory in Manila. However, it is necessary to procure smoking kiln, vacuum packer and cooking equipments by the T/A. These equipments are used not only in the existing BFAR’s laboratories but also in the target fish ports (for demonstration and extension purpose).
3. As for the selection of candidates for expert, as the scope of works cover both fish processing technology and sales promotion (enlightening and extension), two experts in the respective field (fish processing in the 1st year and fish marketing/extension in the 2nd year) had better be procured.
Appendix 20
A-262
Table 20.3 Details of T/ A Component (Improvement of Fresh Fish Quality) Project Technical Assistance for Nationwide Fish Port Project (III) T/A Component Improvement of Fresh Fish Quality Period 3 years(April 2014 – March 2017) Target Area / Beneficiary Iloilo, Lucena, Davao / Boat Operators, Fish Brokers & Buyers Executing Agency PFDA Cooperating Agency BFAR Background and Objectives The market halls inside the PFDA’s regional fish ports have a core role as regional fish wholesale market, and about 60 – 90 metric tons of fishes are dealt in IFPC and LFPC. With the Yen-loan project, the market halls are to be totally rehabilitated and expanded so as to ensure the hygienic environment and smooth fish distribution. On the other hand, as for the qualitative improvement of fishes, it is necessary to expedite the improvement of services (activities) such as improvement of fish handling/trading methods (use of sufficient water and ice, better quality of fish containers, etc.), control of entry of persons not directly related to the market hall, control of low quality fish through sensory inspection, provision of price information needed by stakeholders, etc. The purpose of the proposed T/A is to improve the services related to fish handling and trading, fish quality inspection and assurance, differentiation between fishes dealt in the target fish ports and those dealt outside fish ports (branding), so as to improve value of fishes. Project Purpose Super Goal The status and popularity of target fish ports are improved and more fishes are dealt at the market halls of target fish ports. Project Purpose Quality and value of fishes dealt at the market halls of target fish ports are increased.
Output 1. Fish handling and trading are adequately controlled in the
market halls of target fish ports based on GMP/SSOP. 2. Fish price information services are provided based on the
needs of stakeholders. 3. Fish quality assurance system (standards, operational rules
and regulations, organization) is established. 4. Illegally caught and low quality fishes are not handled in
the market halls. 5. At least 10% of fish handling volume in the market halls
are quality-assured by label, etc. Year Activities Output
1 2 3 4 1. Improvement of fresh fish handling and trading
1.1 Review and amendment of GMP/SSOP process 1.2 Introduction of ID system to stakeholders 1.3 OJT on GMP/SSOP to PFDA personnel
2. Introduction and extension of market price information services 2.1 Needs assessment of port users on price
information 2.2 Designing of price information service system 2.3 Experimental introduction to target fish ports
3. Establishment of fish quality assurance system (QA) 3.1 Preparation of operational guidelines for fresh fish
inspection and assurance 3.2 OJT of inspectors on QA system
4. Extension and enlightening of quality QA system 4.1 Preparation of tools for demonstration and
advertisement 4.2 Regional branding of special fishery products
Rev. GMP/SSOP ID goods (cap, etc.)Training record Assessment report Guideline, drawing Experiment record Guideline Training record HP, Posters Volume of branded fish
-- -- -- --
---- ---- ----
--
---
---- -- ----
Input 【Japanese side】 Personnel: Fish marketing expert (20 p/m), Information service/enlightening & extension expert (20 p/m) Equipment: Quality inspection & assurance equipment (Thermometer, labeling machine, etc.: US$10,000) 【Philippine side】 Personnel: PFDA: Port managers (2), Harbor & Market Operation Chiefs (2), Officers in charge of QA (2) Facilities: Existing fish ports (market halls), office space and office equipment Points to be considered 1. The proposed T/A should be implemented as a yen-loan attached T/A, in combination with other T/A (improvement of quality of fish processed products) having similar objectives, scopes and periods, so as to obtain the multiplier effects and the work effectiveness.
Appendix 20
A-263
Table 20.4 Details of T/ A Component (Development and Extension of HACCP, Quality Control) Project Technical Assistance for Nationwide Fish Port Project (III) T/A Component Development and Extension of HACCP, Quality Control Period 3 years(April 2014 – March 2017) Target Area / Beneficiary Iloilo, Davao, Camaligan, Sual FPC /Existing Fish quality control laboratory Executing Agency PFDA Cooperating Agency BFAR Background and Objectives The fisheries food processing industry has experienced a strong expansion in terms of quantitative growth, product diversification and the permanent incorporation of new and sophisticated technologies. Nonetheless, prevention control system has not developed at the same rate and its structure still focuses upon the final points of the production chain and/or those establishments that constitute the final selling point. Thus, it is necessary to develop a more prevention focused control system so that food safety is guaranteed from that actively involves the relevant production and commercial sectors as well as consumers. The current analytical capacity does not enable an adequate control in the areas of fisheries sector including fish farming, which increasingly use more and antibiotics, hormones and other chemical components that require analytical skills to detect the residues they leave behind. The major problems faced by the program related in the first is the need to develop a new approach as regards the management of the program, and secondly, to the need to strengthen the current analytical capacities in the context of the emergence of a series of new contaminants. At the same time, there is a need to update and improve the analytical response capacity (that is, the process that begins with the taking of samples on the site and ends with the final analysis, including transport) as regards microbiological contaminants associated to emerging and reemerging diseases. In this program, quality of processed fish products are aimed to be improve, and management of fish ports will have stabilized which resulting from stable operation of fish processing factories operated inside of ports (IFPC, DFPC, CFPC and SFPC) and beyond. Project Purpose Super Goal Safety of fisheries processing products in Philippines market is improved and security level of Philippines customer is increased Project Purpose Philippines fisheries processing Food Safety Program is strengthened.
Output 1. Competency of food safety inspectors of BFAR, is improved and their level of inspection and supervision is increased. 2. Competency of PFDA staffs in regional fish port (IFPC, DFPC, CFPC and SFPC) will formulate HACCP program in the port and their level of inspection and supervision is strengthened. 3. Capability of food analysis at target laboratories is strengthened 4. The regional small and medium scale fish processing companies will have access to obtain information for HACCP Planning to encourage their product to export quality products.
Year Activities Output 1 2 3 4
1. Review of fish processed procedure 1.1 Review the current GMP/SSOP and the current fish handling procedures in fish processed facilities in IFPC, DFPC, CFPC and SFPC regions.
Field survey reports --
1.2 Review the current monitoring procedure in competent monitoring authority relating to HACCP system
HACCP audit report
-- -
2. Competency of food safety inspectors
Appendix 20
A-264
2.1 Conduct HACCP basic and inspection trainings for food safety inspectors. 2.2 Develop HACCP models for some selected foods and promote their related enterprises. 2.3 Instruct trainees on the method of formulation of inspection plan and monitor its programs.
Actual plan for HACCP accreditation Model plan of HACCP program
- -- ---- -----
3. Strengthen of Food analysis laboratory capability, relating to HACCP(DFPC, CFPC,IFPC)
SOP for current laboratory analysis
3.1 Conduct training for HACCP laboratory analysis methods 3.2 Plan and implement validation plan for Laboratory work. 3.3 Training on analytical equipments 3.3 Formalize the analytical methods
HACCP laboratory methods
---- -- ---- -----
4. Formulation of monitoring and sampling
--
4.1 Determination of products to be sampled 4.2 Determination of sampling numbers and handling methods 4.3 Develop procedures and methods for sample handling
Sampling methods for HACCP
-- ---
Input 【Japanese side】 HACCP Specialist (20 M/M) Equipment for laboratory work (200,000 US$) Glassware, chemical equipments, LC/MS, Microscope, computer, etc. 【Philippine side】 Counterpart personnel from Philippine side PFDA port managers (IFPC, DFPC, CFPC and SFPC) PFDA HACCP staff (IFPC, DFPC, CFPC and SFPC) BFAR laboratory staff (Chemical and microbiology analysis) PFDA Officers in charge of quality assurance (IFPC, DFPC, CFPC and SFPC) Points to be considered ・ Good manufacturing practice / Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures will be precondition for the
implementation of HACCP program, and should be established. ・ HACCP program shall be prepared according to methods of Philippine’s competence agency (BFAR) ・ Laboratories conduct analyses are planed to implement in the existing laboratories own by BFAR. However,
laboratory facilities in fish ports will be use with completion of its construction by the Project ・ Japanese specialist should prepare feedback system or share the information relating HACCP requirements to
the Project. It is strongly requested to notifies the necessary information or changes of the HACCP requirement to construction for processing facilities in the fish port by the Project
・ Small and medium scale fish processing enterprise are interested to HACCP program and cooperate to training.
Appendix 21
A-265
Appendix 21. Project Cost Considering the Improvement/Construction of the Six Regional Fish Ports Only
Should the five (5) municipal fish ports be excluded from the scope of works, the Project will comprise only of the improvement/construction of the six (6) regional fish ports. Under this scenario, the project cost is estimated at Php. 5,082 billion.
Table 21.1 Project Cost (Regional Fish Ports Only)
Cost Item Amount (PHP million)
Share (%)
1 Project Costs 5,082 100 2 Foreign Portion (financed by JICA) 4,320 85 3 Local Portion (financed by GOP) *1 762 15 Note *1: The government of the Philippines (GOP) is burdened the commitment charge (PHP32 million) added to the above amount. Therefore defrayment of GOP is PHP 794 million.
Summary of the estimated project cost for the six (6) regional fish ports only is tabulated hereunder.
Table 21.2 Summary of Project Cost (Regional Fish Ports Only) UNIT: 1,000 PHP
(A) (D) Cost Considered (E) Contingency (F) Total CostTotal of Base Cost Price Escalation 8%
Project Component (including VAT) 7.1% per year 1.8% per year (D) = (A)+(B)+(C) (E) = (D) x Conti.(%) (F) = (D) + (E)1, Cost for Construction works and Equipment Supply1) Package 1 (Iloilo) 557,874 636,592 50,927 687,5192) Package 2 (Sual, Lucena and Camaligan) 690,786 784,990 62,799 847,7893) Package 3 (Davao and Bislig) 715,097 817,656 65,412 883,0694) Package 4 (Equipment Supply) 1,662,482 1,870,635 149,651 2,020,286
Sub-Total 1 3,626,239 4,109,872 328,790 4,438,6622, Consulting Cost1) Detail Design 187,304 187,304 0 187,3042) Construction Management 374,561 374,561 0 374,561
Sub-Total 2 561,865 561,865 0 561,8653, Sub-Total 3 (=Sub-Total 1 + 2) 4,188,105 4,671,738 328,790 5,000,5274, Others1) PFDA Administration Cost (PMO) 24,499 0 0 24,4992) Fish Port Management (T/ A) 37,050 0 0 37,0503) Land Accruement Expense (Bislig) 20,000 0 0 20,000
Sub-Total 4 81,549 0 0 81,5495, Total
Total Cost (=Sub-Total 3 +4 ) 4,269,653 4,671,738 328,790 5,082,076
Note 1: Total Local Cost will be 838 (million PHP) includes Loan Commitment Charge.
(1,000 PHP)JPY Equivalent
(1,000 JPY)Note 2: Loan Commitment Charge Japanese Yen Loan (85% of Total Cost) 4,319,765 8,443,278
= Total Cost x 0.85 x 0.1% x 7 years = 31,972 (1,000 PHP) Local Portion (15% of Total Cost) 762,311 -Note 3: 1US$=JPY90.520=PHP46. 312 Total 5,082,076 -Note 4: Abbreviation
PMO: Project Management Office T/ A: Technical Assistance
Note 5: Breakdown of the cost for PFDA administration Cost (PMO) is shown in the table 18.2.2.
188,764 294,869
Currency Portion
0 0
0 00 0
0 0
0 0188,764 294,869
0 00 0
188,764 294,869
44,884 57,67568,383 139,770
34,420 44,29741,077 53,126
(B) Price Escalation (C) Price Escalation(Local) (Foreign)
The disbursement schedule in case that the project is composed of only six (6) regional fish ports is shown in the following table.
Appendix 21
A-266
Table 21.3 Disbursement Schedule (Regional Fish Ports Only) Unit: 1,000 PHP
Local Foreign Total Local Foreign Total Local Foreign Total1 Base Cost of Package 1 83,681 474,193 557,874 0 0 0 0 0 0
Price Escalation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 Base Cost of Package 2 103,618 587,168 690,786 0 0 0 0 0 0
Price Escalation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 Base Cost of Package 3 107,265 607,833 715,097 0 0 0 0 0 0
Price Escalation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 Base Cost of Package 4 166,248 1,496,234 1,662,482 0 0 0 0 0 0
Price Escalation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0SUB-TOTAL (=1+2+3+4) 460,812 3,165,428 3,626,239 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 Consulting Cost for Detailed Design 65,556 121,748 187,304 32,778 60,874 93,652 32,778 60,874 93,6526 Consulting Cost for Construction Management 131,096 243,465 374,561 0 0 0 0 0 0
GRAND TOTAL (SUB-TOTAL + 5+6) 657,465 3,530,640 4,188,105 32,778 60,874 93,652 32,778 60,874 93,652
Base Cost (2010) 2,012 2,013
Unit: 1,000 PHP
Local Foreign Total Local Foreign Total Local Foreign Total Local Foreign Total27,894 158,064 185,958 27,894 158,064 185,958 27,894 158,064 185,958 83,681 474,193 557,8748,806 11,692 20,498 11,412 14,747 26,159 14,203 17,858 32,060 34,420 44,297 78,717
35,149 199,179 234,328 48,788 276,466 325,254 19,681 111,523 131,204 103,618 587,168 690,78611,097 14,733 25,830 19,960 25,794 45,754 10,021 12,600 22,620 41,077 53,126 94,20427,527 155,986 183,513 44,043 249,577 293,620 35,695 202,270 237,964 107,265 607,833 715,0978,690 11,538 20,228 18,019 23,285 41,304 18,174 22,852 41,027 44,884 57,675 102,559
55,416 498,745 554,161 55,416 498,745 554,161 55,416 498,745 554,161 249,372 1,413,109 1,662,48217,495 36,891 54,386 22,672 46,532 69,204 28,216 56,347 84,563 68,383 139,770 208,153192,074 1,086,827 1,278,901 248,203 1,293,211 1,541,414 209,299 1,080,259 1,289,557 732,700 3,377,172 4,109,872
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65,556 121,748 187,30443,699 81,155 124,854 43,699 81,155 124,854 43,699 81,155 124,854 131,096 243,465 374,561235,773 1,167,982 1,403,755 291,902 1,374,366 1,666,268 252,997 1,161,414 1,414,411 929,353 3,742,385 4,671,738
TOTAL2014 2015 2016
The summary of the estimated base cost for the six regional fish ports which are split into 3 packages is shown in the table below.
Table 21.4 Summary of Base Cost (Regional Fish Port Only)
Unit: 1,000 PHP
1 ILOILO 557,874 557,874 803,916 1,361,791SUAL 274,999 186,219 461,218LUCENA 268,099 47,438 315,537CAMALIGAN 147,688 219,252 366,940DAVAO 75,815 88,741 164,556BISLIG 639,283 316,915 956,198
TOTAL 1,963,758 1,963,758 1,662,482 3,626,239
2 690,786
3 715,097
(2) Total of Base Costfor Each Package
(3) Cost ofEquipment for Each
(4) Total of BareCost for Each SitePackage Regional Fish Port (1) Cost of
Construction for Each
The table hereunder shows the annual funding plan for each of the Package mentioned above.
Appendix 21
A-267
Loca
lFo
reig
nTo
tal
Loca
lFo
reig
nTo
tal
Loca
lFo
reig
nTo
tal
Loca
lFo
reig
nTo
tal
Loca
lFo
reig
nTo
tal
Loca
lFo
reig
nTo
tal
Loca
lFo
reig
nTo
tal
Iloilo
Base
Cos
t (Co
nstru
ctio
n W
orks
)74
,715
423,
387
498,
102
00
00
00
24,9
0514
1,12
916
6,03
424
,905
141,
129
166,
034
24,9
0514
1,12
916
6,03
474
,715
423,
387
498,
102
VA
T (1
2%)
8,96
650
,806
59,7
720
00
00
02,
989
16,9
3519
,924
2,98
916
,935
19,9
242,
989
16,9
3519
,924
8,96
650
,806
59,7
72Su
b-to
tal 1
83,6
8147
4,19
355
7,87
40
00
00
027
,894
158,
064
185,
958
27,8
9415
8,06
418
5,95
827
,894
158,
064
185,
958
83,6
8147
4,19
355
7,87
4Pr
ice
Esca
latio
n0
00
00
00
00
8,80
611
,692
20,4
9811
,412
14,7
4726
,159
14,2
0317
,858
32,0
6034
,420
44,2
9778
,717
Sub-
tota
l 283
,681
474,
193
557,
874
00
00
00
36,7
0016
9,75
620
6,45
639
,306
172,
812
212,
117
42,0
9617
5,92
221
8,01
911
8,10
251
8,49
063
6,59
2Ph
ysic
al C
ontin
genc
y (8
%)
00
00
00
00
02,
477
14,0
3916
,516
2,54
514
,424
16,9
692,
616
14,8
2517
,441
7,63
943
,288
50,9
27Co
nsul
ting
Cost
for D
etai
led
Des
ign
10,0
8518
,730
28,8
165,
043
9,36
514
,408
5,04
39,
365
14,4
080
00
00
00
00
10,0
8518
,730
28,8
16Co
nsul
ting
Cost
for C
onst
ruct
ion
Man
agem
ent
20,1
6837
,456
57,6
240
00
00
06,
723
12,4
8519
,208
6,72
312
,485
19,2
086,
723
12,4
8519
,208
20,1
6837
,456
57,6
24PF
DA
Adm
inis
tratio
n Co
st (P
MO
)5,
544
05,
544
00
00
00
1,84
80
1,84
81,
848
01,
848
1,84
80
1,84
85,
544
05,
544
Fish
Por
t Man
agem
ent (
T/A
)1,
852
10,4
9712
,350
00
00
00
617
3,49
94,
117
617
3,49
94,
117
617
3,49
94,
117
1,85
210
,497
12,3
50La
nd A
ccru
emen
t Exp
ense
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0To
tal
121,
332
540,
876
662,
208
5,04
39,
365
14,4
085,
043
9,36
514
,408
48,3
6619
9,77
924
8,14
551
,039
203,
220
254,
259
53,9
0120
6,73
226
0,63
316
3,39
162
8,46
179
1,85
3
Sual
Base
Cos
t (Co
nstru
ctio
n W
orks
)36
,830
208,
705
245,
535
00
00
00
16,1
1391
,308
107,
421
18,4
1510
4,35
212
2,76
72,
302
13,0
4415
,346
36,8
3020
8,70
524
5,53
5V
AT
(12%
)4,
420
25,0
4529
,464
00
00
00
1,93
410
,957
12,8
912,
210
12,5
2214
,732
276
1,56
51,
842
4,42
025
,045
29,4
64Su
b-to
tal 1
41,2
5023
3,74
927
4,99
90
00
00
018
,047
102,
265
120,
312
20,6
2511
6,87
513
7,49
92,
578
14,6
0917
,187
41,2
5023
3,74
927
4,99
9Lu
cena
Base
Cos
t (Co
nstru
ctio
n W
orks
)35
,906
203,
468
239,
374
00
00
00
8,97
750
,867
59,8
4417
,953
101,
734
119,
687
8,97
750
,867
59,8
4435
,906
203,
468
239,
374
VA
T (1
2%)
4,30
924
,416
28,7
250
00
00
01,
077
6,10
47,
181
2,15
412
,208
14,3
621,
077
6,10
47,
181
4,30
924
,416
28,7
25Su
b-to
tal 2
40,2
1522
7,88
426
8,09
90
00
00
010
,054
56,9
7167
,025
20,1
0711
3,94
213
4,04
910
,054
56,9
7167
,025
40,2
1522
7,88
426
8,09
9Ca
mal
igan
Base
Cos
t (Co
nstru
ctio
n W
orks
)19
,780
112,
085
131,
864
00
00
00
6,29
435
,663
41,9
577,
193
40,7
5847
,951
6,29
435
,663
41,9
5719
,780
112,
085
131,
864
VA
T (1
2%)
2,37
413
,450
15,8
240
00
00
075
54,
280
5,03
586
34,
891
5,75
475
54,
280
5,03
52,
374
13,4
5015
,824
Sub-
tota
l 322
,153
125,
535
147,
688
00
00
00
7,04
939
,943
46,9
928,
056
45,6
4953
,705
7,04
939
,943
46,9
9222
,153
125,
535
147,
688
Sub-
tota
l 4 (=
1+2+
3)10
3,61
858
7,16
869
0,78
60
00
00
035
,149
199,
179
234,
328
48,7
8827
6,46
632
5,25
419
,681
111,
523
131,
204
103,
618
587,
168
690,
786
Pric
e Es
cala
tion
00
00
00
00
011
,097
14,7
3325
,830
19,9
6025
,794
45,7
5410
,021
12,6
0022
,620
41,0
7753
,126
94,2
04Su
b-to
tal 5
103,
618
587,
168
690,
786
00
00
00
46,2
4621
3,91
226
0,15
868
,748
302,
260
371,
008
29,7
0112
4,12
315
3,82
414
4,69
564
0,29
478
4,99
0Ph
ysic
al C
ontin
genc
y (8
%)
00
00
00
00
03,
122
17,6
9120
,813
4,45
225
,229
29,6
811,
846
10,4
6012
,306
9,42
053
,379
62,7
99Co
nsul
ting
Cost
for D
etai
led
Des
ign
12,4
8823
,193
35,6
816,
244
11,5
9617
,840
6,24
411
,596
17,8
400
00
00
00
00
12,4
8823
,193
35,6
81Co
nsul
ting
Cost
for C
onst
ruct
ion
Man
agem
ent
24,9
7346
,379
71,3
530
00
00
08,
324
15,4
6023
,784
8,32
415
,460
23,7
848,
324
15,4
6023
,784
24,9
7346
,379
71,3
53PF
DA
Adm
inis
tratio
n Co
st (P
MO
)8,
014
08,
014
00
00
00
2,67
10
2,67
12,
671
02,
671
2,67
10
2,67
18,
014
08,
014
Fish
Por
t Man
agem
ent (
T/A
)1,
852
10,4
9712
,350
00
00
00
617
3,49
94,
117
617
3,49
94,
117
617
3,49
94,
117
1,85
210
,497
12,3
50La
nd A
ccru
emen
t Exp
ense
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0To
tal
150,
946
667,
237
818,
183
6,24
411
,596
17,8
406,
244
11,5
9617
,840
60,9
8125
0,56
231
1,54
384
,814
346,
447
431,
261
43,1
6115
3,54
219
6,70
220
1,44
477
3,74
397
5,18
7
Dav
aoBa
se C
ost (
Cons
truct
ion
Wor
ks)
10,1
5457
,538
67,6
920
00
00
03,
173
17,9
8121
,154
5,07
728
,769
33,8
461,
904
10,7
8812
,692
10,1
5457
,538
67,6
92V
AT
(12%
)1,
218
6,90
58,
123
00
00
00
381
2,15
82,
538
609
3,45
24,
061
228
1,29
51,
523
1,21
86,
905
8,12
3Su
b-to
tal 1
11,3
7264
,442
75,8
150
00
00
03,
554
20,1
3823
,692
5,68
632
,221
37,9
072,
132
12,0
8314
,215
11,3
7264
,442
75,8
15Bi
slig
Base
Cos
t (Co
nstru
ctio
n W
orks
)85
,618
485,
170
570,
788
00
00
00
21,4
0512
1,29
214
2,69
734
,247
194,
068
228,
315
29,9
6616
9,80
919
9,77
685
,618
485,
170
570,
788
VA
T (1
2%)
10,2
7458
,220
68,4
950
00
00
02,
569
14,5
5517
,124
4,11
023
,288
27,3
983,
596
20,3
7723
,973
10,2
7458
,220
68,4
95Su
b-to
tal 2
95,8
9254
3,39
063
9,28
30
00
00
023
,973
135,
848
159,
821
38,3
5721
7,35
625
5,71
333
,562
190,
187
223,
749
95,8
9254
3,39
063
9,28
3Su
b-to
tal 3
(=1+
2)10
7,26
560
7,83
371
5,09
70
00
00
027
,527
155,
986
183,
513
44,0
4324
9,57
729
3,62
035
,695
202,
270
237,
964
107,
265
607,
833
715,
097
Pric
e Es
cala
tion
00
00
00
00
08,
690
11,5
3820
,228
18,0
1923
,285
41,3
0418
,174
22,8
5241
,027
44,8
8457
,675
102,
559
Sub-
tota
l 4
107,
265
607,
833
715,
097
00
00
00
36,2
1716
7,52
420
3,74
162
,062
272,
863
334,
924
53,8
6922
5,12
227
8,99
115
2,14
866
5,50
881
7,65
6Ph
ysic
al C
ontin
genc
y (8
%)
00
00
00
00
02,
445
13,8
5416
,299
4,01
922
,775
26,7
943,
348
18,9
7122
,319
9,81
255
,601
65,4
12Co
nsul
ting
Cost
for D
etai
led
Des
ign
12,9
2824
,009
36,9
376,
464
12,0
0418
,468
6,46
412
,004
18,4
680
00
00
00
00
12,9
2824
,009
36,9
37Co
nsul
ting
Cost
for C
onst
ruct
ion
Man
agem
ent
25,8
5248
,011
73,8
640
00
00
08,
617
16,0
0424
,621
8,61
716
,004
24,6
218,
617
16,0
0424
,621
25,8
5248
,011
73,8
64PF
DA
Adm
inis
tratio
n Co
st (P
MO
)6,
612
06,
612
00
00
00
2,20
40
2,20
42,
204
02,
204
2,20
40
2,20
46,
612
06,
612
Fish
Por
t Man
agem
ent (
T/A
)1,
852
10,4
9712
,350
00
00
00
617
3,49
94,
117
617
3,49
94,
117
617
3,49
94,
117
1,85
210
,497
12,3
50La
nd A
ccru
emen
t Exp
ense
20,0
000
20,0
000
00
20,0
000
20,0
000
00
00
00
00
20,0
000
20,0
00To
tal
174,
509
690,
350
864,
860
6,46
412
,004
18,4
6826
,464
12,0
0438
,468
50,1
0120
0,88
125
0,98
277
,520
315,
140
392,
660
68,6
5626
3,59
633
2,25
222
9,20
580
3,62
61,
032,
831
2 3
Uni
t: 1,
000
PHP
1
2015
2016
Tota
lPa
ckag
eRe
gion
alFi
sh P
ort
Mun
icip
alFi
sh P
ort
Item
sBa
se C
ost (
2010
)20
1220
1320
14
Tab
le 2
1.5
Ann
ual F
undi
ng P
lan
for
Eac
h Pa
ckag
e (R
egio
nal F
ish
Port
Onl
y)
Appendix 21
A-268
Lo
cal
Fore
ign
Tota
lLo
cal
Fore
ign
Tota
lLo
cal
Fore
ign
Tota
lLo
cal
Fore
ign
Tota
lLo
cal
Fore
ign
Tota
lLo
cal
Fore
ign
Tota
lLo
cal
Fore
ign
Tota
lIlo
iloBa
se C
ost
28,6
8725
8,17
928
6,86
60
00
00
09,
562
86,0
6095
,622
9,56
286
,060
95,6
229,
562
86,0
6095
,622
28,6
8725
8,17
928
6,86
6V
AT
(12%
)3,
442
30,9
8134
,424
00
00
00
1,14
710
,327
11,4
751,
147
10,3
2711
,475
1,14
710
,327
11,4
753,
442
30,9
8134
,424
Sub-
tota
l 132
,129
289,
161
321,
290
00
00
00
10,7
1096
,387
107,
097
10,7
1096
,387
107,
097
10,7
1096
,387
107,
097
32,1
2928
9,16
132
1,29
0Su
alBa
se C
ost
13,7
2812
3,55
213
7,28
00
00
00
04,
576
41,1
8445
,760
4,57
641
,184
45,7
604,
576
41,1
8445
,760
13,7
2812
3,55
213
7,28
0V
AT
(12%
)1,
647
14,8
2616
,474
00
00
00
549
4,94
25,
491
549
4,94
25,
491
549
4,94
25,
491
1,64
714
,826
16,4
74Su
b-to
tal 2
15,3
7513
8,37
815
3,75
30
00
00
05,
125
46,1
2651
,251
5,12
546
,126
51,2
515,
125
46,1
2651
,251
15,3
7513
8,37
815
3,75
3Lu
cena
Base
Cos
t 3,
708
33,3
6937
,076
00
00
00
1,23
611
,123
12,3
591,
236
11,1
2312
,359
1,23
611
,123
12,3
593,
708
33,3
6937
,076
VA
T (1
2%)
445
4,00
44,
449
00
00
00
148
1,33
51,
483
148
1,33
51,
483
148
1,33
51,
483
445
4,00
44,
449
Sub-
tota
l 3
4,15
337
,373
41,5
250
00
00
01,
384
12,4
5813
,842
1,38
412
,458
13,8
421,
384
12,4
5813
,842
4,15
337
,373
41,5
25C
amal
igan
Bas
e C
ost
16,3
7614
7,38
316
3,75
90
00
00
05,
459
49,1
2854
,586
5,45
949
,128
54,5
865,
459
49,1
2854
,586
16,3
7614
7,38
316
3,75
9V
AT
(12%
)1,
965
17,6
8619
,651
00
00
00
655
5,89
56,
550
655
5,89
56,
550
655
5,89
56,
550
1,96
517
,686
19,6
51Su
b-to
tal 4
18
,341
165,
069
183,
410
00
00
00
6,11
455
,023
61,1
376,
114
55,0
2361
,137
6,11
455
,023
61,1
3718
,341
165,
069
183,
410
Dav
aoB
ase
Cos
t 5,
673
51,0
5356
,726
00
00
00
1,89
117
,018
18,9
091,
891
17,0
1818
,909
1,89
117
,018
18,9
095,
673
51,0
5356
,726
VA
T (1
2%)
681
6,12
66,
807
00
00
00
227
2,04
22,
269
227
2,04
22,
269
227
2,04
22,
269
681
6,12
66,
807
Sub-
tota
l 5
6,35
357
,179
63,5
330
00
00
02,
118
19,0
6021
,178
2,11
819
,060
21,1
782,
118
19,0
6021
,178
6,35
357
,179
63,5
33B
islig
Base
Cos
t 27
,333
245,
994
273,
327
00
00
00
9,11
181
,998
91,1
099,
111
81,9
9891
,109
9,11
181
,998
91,1
0927
,333
245,
994
273,
327
VA
T (1
2%)
3,28
029
,519
32,7
990
00
00
01,
093
9,84
010
,933
1,09
39,
840
10,9
331,
093
9,84
010
,933
3,28
029
,519
32,7
99Su
b-to
tal 6
30
,613
275,
513
306,
126
00
00
00
10,2
0491
,838
102,
042
10,2
0491
,838
102,
042
10,2
0491
,838
102,
042
30,6
1327
5,51
330
6,12
6Su
b-to
tal 7
(=1+
2+3+
4+5+
6)10
6,96
496
2,67
31,
069,
637
00
00
00
35,6
5532
0,89
135
6,54
635
,655
320,
891
356,
546
35,6
5532
0,89
135
6,54
610
6,96
496
2,67
31,
069,
637
Iloilo
Base
Cos
t ( S
olar
Pow
er S
yste
m w
ithou
t Bat
ter
37,7
5033
9,75
037
7,50
00
00
00
012
,583
113,
250
125,
833
12,5
8311
3,25
012
5,83
312
,583
113,
250
125,
833
37,7
5033
9,75
037
7,50
0V
AT
(12%
)4,
530
40,7
7045
,300
00
00
00
1,51
013
,590
15,1
001,
510
13,5
9015
,100
1,51
013
,590
15,1
004,
530
40,7
7045
,300
Sub-
tota
l 842
,280
380,
520
422,
800
00
00
00
14,0
9312
6,84
014
0,93
314
,093
126,
840
140,
933
14,0
9312
6,84
014
0,93
342
,280
380,
520
422,
800
Iloilo
Base
Cos
t 5,
342
48,0
7553
,417
00
00
00
1,78
116
,025
17,8
061,
781
16,0
2517
,806
1,78
116
,025
17,8
065,
342
48,0
7553
,417
VA
T (1
2%)
641
5,76
96,
410
00
00
00
214
1,92
32,
137
214
1,92
32,
137
214
1,92
32,
137
641
5,76
96,
410
Sub-
tota
l 9
5,98
353
,844
59,8
270
00
00
01,
994
17,9
4819
,942
1,99
417
,948
19,9
421,
994
17,9
4819
,942
5,98
353
,844
59,8
27Su
alBa
se C
ost
2,89
926
,088
28,9
870
00
00
096
68,
696
9,66
296
68,
696
9,66
296
68,
696
9,66
22,
899
26,0
8828
,987
VA
T (1
2%)
348
3,13
13,
478
00
00
00
116
1,04
41,
159
116
1,04
41,
159
116
1,04
41,
159
348
3,13
13,
478
Sub-
tota
l 10
3,24
729
,219
32,4
660
00
00
01,
082
9,74
010
,822
1,08
29,
740
10,8
221,
082
9,74
010
,822
3,24
729
,219
32,4
66Lu
cena
Base
Cos
t 52
84,
752
5,28
00
00
00
017
61,
584
1,76
017
61,
584
1,76
017
61,
584
1,76
052
84,
752
5,28
0V
AT
(12%
)63
570
634
00
00
00
2119
021
121
190
211
2119
021
163
570
634
Sub-
tota
l 11
591
5,32
25,
913
00
00
00
197
1,77
41,
971
197
1,77
41,
971
197
1,77
41,
971
591
5,32
25,
913
Cam
alig
anB
ase
Cos
t 3,
200
28,8
0232
,002
00
00
00
1,06
79,
601
10,6
671,
067
9,60
110
,667
1,06
79,
601
10,6
673,
200
28,8
0232
,002
VA
T (1
2%)
384
3,45
63,
840
00
00
00
128
1,15
21,
280
128
1,15
21,
280
128
1,15
21,
280
384
3,45
63,
840
Sub-
tota
l 12
3,58
432
,258
35,8
420
00
00
01,
195
10,7
5311
,947
1,19
510
,753
11,9
471,
195
10,7
5311
,947
3,58
432
,258
35,8
42D
avao
Bas
e C
ost
2,25
120
,257
22,5
080
00
00
075
06,
752
7,50
375
06,
752
7,50
375
06,
752
7,50
32,
251
20,2
5722
,508
VA
T (1
2%)
270
2,43
12,
701
00
00
00
9081
090
090
810
900
9081
090
027
02,
431
2,70
1Su
b-to
tal 1
32,
521
22,6
8825
,209
00
00
00
840
7,56
38,
403
840
7,56
38,
403
840
7,56
38,
403
2,52
122
,688
25,2
09B
islig
Base
Cos
t 96
38,
670
9,63
30
00
00
032
12,
890
3,21
132
12,
890
3,21
132
12,
890
3,21
196
38,
670
9,63
3V
AT
(12%
)11
61,
040
1,15
60
00
00
039
347
385
3934
738
539
347
385
116
1,04
01,
156
Sub-
tota
l 14
1,07
99,
710
10,7
890
00
00
036
03,
237
3,59
636
03,
237
3,59
636
03,
237
3,59
61,
079
9,71
010
,789
Sub-
tota
l 15
(=9+
10+1
1+12
+13+
14)
17,0
0515
3,04
117
0,04
50
00
00
05,
668
51,0
1456
,682
5,66
851
,014
56,6
825,
668
51,0
1456
,682
17,0
0515
3,04
117
0,04
5To
tal o
f Sub
-pac
kage
1, 2
and
3
Su
btot
al 1
6 (=
7+8+
1516
6,24
81,
496,
234
1,66
2,48
20
00
00
055
,416
498,
745
554,
161
55,4
1649
8,74
555
4,16
155
,416
498,
745
554,
161
166,
248
1,49
6,23
41,
662,
482
Pric
e Es
cala
tion
00
00
00
00
017
,495
36,8
9154
,386
22,6
7246
,532
69,2
0428
,216
56,3
4784
,563
68,3
8313
9,77
020
8,15
3Su
b-to
tal 1
716
6,24
81,
496,
234
1,66
2,48
20
00
00
072
,911
535,
635
608,
546
78,0
8854
5,27
762
3,36
583
,632
555,
092
638,
724
234,
631
1,63
6,00
41,
870,
635
Phys
ical
Con
tinge
ncy
(8%
)0
00
00
00
00
7,30
341
,381
48,6
847,
480
42,3
8949
,869
7,66
543
,433
51,0
9822
,448
127,
203
149,
651
Cons
ultin
g Co
st fo
r Det
aile
d D
esig
n30
,055
55,8
1685
,871
15,0
2727
,908
42,9
3615
,027
27,9
0842
,936
00
00
00
00
030
,055
55,8
1685
,871
Cons
ultin
g Co
st fo
r Con
stru
ctio
n M
anag
emen
t60
,102
111,
619
171,
721
00
00
00
20,0
3437
,206
57,2
4020
,034
37,2
0657
,240
20,0
3437
,206
57,2
4060
,102
111,
619
171,
721
PFD
A A
dmin
istra
tion
Cost
(PM
O)
4,32
80
4,32
80
00
00
01,
443
01,
443
1,44
30
1,44
31,
443
01,
443
4,32
80
4,32
8Fi
sh P
ort M
anag
emen
t (T/
A)
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0La
nd A
ccru
emen
t Exp
ense
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0To
tal
260,
734
1,66
3,66
81,
924,
402
15,0
2727
,908
42,9
3615
,027
27,9
0842
,936
101,
690
614,
223
715,
913
107,
045
624,
872
731,
917
112,
774
635,
731
748,
505
351,
564
1,93
0,64
22,
282,
206
Loca
lFo
reig
nTo
tal
Loca
lFo
reig
nTo
tal
Loca
lFo
reig
nTo
tal
Loca
lFo
reig
nTo
tal
Loca
lFo
reig
nTo
tal
Loca
lFo
reig
nTo
tal
Loca
lFo
reig
nTo
tal
Am
ount
per
yea
r -
- -
32,7
7860
,874
93,6
5252
,778
60,8
7411
3,65
226
1,13
91,
265,
445
1,52
6,58
332
0,41
81,
489,
679
1,81
0,09
727
8,49
11,
259,
601
1,53
8,09
294
5,60
44,
136,
472
5,08
2,07
6
Acc
umul
ated
Am
ount
707,
521
3,56
2,13
24,
269,
653
32,7
7860
,874
93,6
5285
,556
121,
748
207,
304
346,
695
1,38
7,19
21,
733,
887
667,
113
2,87
6,87
13,
543,
984
945,
604
4,13
6,47
25,
082,
076
- -
-
Not
e:
*Loa
n C
omm
itmen
t Cha
rge
= T
otal
Cos
t x 0
.85
x 0.
1% x
7 y
ears
= 3
1,97
2 (1
,000
PH
P) a
nd T
he G
over
nmen
t of t
he P
hilip
pine
s (G
OP)
is b
urde
ned
the
amou
nt.
*Exc
hang
e Ra
te: 1
US$
=JPY
90.5
20=P
HP
46.3
12T
OT
AL
5,08
2,07
6
2016
Tota
l
Japa
nese
Yen
Loa
n (8
5% o
f Tot
al A
mou
nt)
Cur
renc
y Po
tion
Uni
t: 1,
000
PHP
Pack
age
Item
sBa
se C
ost (
2010
)20
1220
1320
1420
15Su
b-Pa
ckag
eRe
gion
alFi
sh P
ort
2013
2014
2015
1. Ice Making & Refrigeration Facilities2.
SolarPowerSystem
3. Other Equipment
2016
Tota
lTo
tal o
f all
Pack
ages
4
Base
Cos
t (20
10)
2012
Loca
l Pot
ion
(15
% o
f Tot
al A
mou
nt)
(1,0
00 P
HP)
JPY
Equ
ival
ent
(1,0
00JP
Y)
4,31
9,76
58,
443,
278
762,
311
Tab
le 2
1.5
Ann
ual F
und
Plan
of E
ach
Pack
age
(Reg
iona
l Fis
h Po
rt O
nly)
(Con
tinue
d)