Transcript
Page 1: Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes

Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes

N. Akchurin, Texas Tech University, USAN. Buttimore, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland A. Penzo, INFN & Dip di Fisica, Trieste, Italy

Page 2: Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes

2

Introduction• Proton proton collisions probe analyticity and spin

effects • A dispersion relation violation may suggest a new

mass scale • Hadronic spin effects appear in t = 0 fermion

fermion scattering • Seek the spin implications when evaluating

transition amplitudes • Study forward spin dependence for cross section

normalisation

September 30, 2010N. Buttimore, SPIN2010 Jülich

Page 3: Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes

3

Small Angle Collisions of Protons and Ions

The level of hadronic spin dependence is important in the context of

• Parton distribution functions and nucleon form factors

• Measuring the proton beam polarization at BNL RHIC, Makdisi, AIP Conf Proc 980

• Spin dependent couplings of the Pomeron, Trueman, Phys Rev D77

September 30, 2010N. Buttimore, SPIN2010 Jülich

Page 4: Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes

4

Analyzing Power in CNI Region

September 30, 2010N. Buttimore, SPIN2010 Jülich

• For the current analyses, we assume double-flip amplitude is zero• The Coulomb phase is 0.02• The rho parameter is 0.02

Page 5: Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes

N. Buttimore, SPIN2010 Julich 5September 30, 2010

Page 6: Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes

6

Global Fit to Small –t Data

September 30, 2010N. Buttimore, SPIN2010 Jülich

E704 (p=200 GeV/c) RHIC (p=100 GeV/c)☐ RHIC (√s= 200 GeV)

Page 7: Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes

7

Phase Angle vs |r5|

September 30, 2010N. Buttimore, SPIN2010 Jülich

1s 3s2s

Page 8: Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes

8

Conclusions• When all available small –t data are analyzed, the

hadronic spin flip is small (value…)• The magnitude of |r5|= 0.059 ± 0.008 and the phase

angle q5= 94.1 ± 1.7 degrees• Only statistical experimental errors are considered in

this analysis. The systematic errors need to be included especially when they are comparable or larger

• pp data at 6.8 GeV suggest sizable hadronic spin flip…• pC data ….• ….

September 30, 2010N. Buttimore, SPIN2010 Jülich

Page 9: Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes

9

Overlay Alek6.8GeV (do we need this?) maybe save it as a back up

September 30, 2010N. Buttimore, SPIN2010 Julich

Page 10: Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes

N. Buttimore, SPIN2010 Julich 10

pC Tojo Fit

September 30, 2010

Page 11: Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes

N. Buttimore, SPIN2010 Julich 11

pC Tojo Contours (1, 2 and 3 sigma)

September 30, 2010

Page 12: Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes

N. Buttimore, SPIN2010 Julich 12

pC Tojo Magnitude and Phase?

September 30, 2010

Page 13: Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes

N. Buttimore, SPIN2010 Julich 13

pC Jinnouchi Fit

September 30, 2010

Page 14: Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes

N. Buttimore, SPIN2010 Julich 14

pC Jinnouchi Contours (1, 2 and 3 sigma)

September 30, 2010

Page 15: Forward Collisions and Spin Effects in Evaluating Amplitudes

N. Buttimore, SPIN2010 Julich 15

pC Jinn Magnitude and Phase?

September 30, 2010


Top Related