-
Lecture Three:
Observed Properties of Galaxies, contd.
Longair, chapter 3
+ literature
Monday 18th Feb
1
-
The Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram
LOW MASS STARS LIVE A VERY VERY LONG TIME!colour
magnitude
2
-
The Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram
LOW MASS STARS LIVE A VERY VERY LONG TIME!colour
magnitude
3
-
The Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram
LOW MASS STARS LIVE A VERY VERY LONG TIME!colour
magnitude
4
-
The Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram
LOW MASS STARS LIVE A VERY VERY LONG TIME!colour
magnitude
5
-
The Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram
LOW MASS STARS LIVE A VERY VERY LONG TIME!colour
magnitude
6
-
What do colours mean?
7
-
Spectrum of an Elliptical galaxy
U B V R I
8
-
What does it mean?
Stellar spectra
>10Gyr
~8Gyr
~1.5Gyr
~5Myr
U B V R
9
-
O’Connell 1986 PASP, 98, 163
Star Formation History
Elliptical Galaxy
10
-
Hubble Sequence
Early type Late type
Fundamental difference between Elliptical galaxies and galaxies with disks, and variations of disk type & importance of bulges…
Hubble 1936, the Realm of Nebulae
11
-
Environment
12
-
Globular Clusters in Milky
~140 globular clusters, 65%
-
Globular Clusters & galaxy formation and evolution
metal rich(disk)
metal poor (halo)
milky way disk
Zinn 1985 ApJ, 293, 424
vrot = 43 +/- 29km/sσlos = 116 +/- 11km/s
vrot = 193 +/- 29km/sσlos = 59 +/- 14km/s
Armandroff 1989 AJ 97 375
flattened from rotation dominated by random motions
14
-
Metallicity dispersion is large; mean metallicity decreases with increasing distance from galactic centre
metal rich
metal poor
Zinn 1985 ApJ, 293, 424
Globular Clusters & galaxy formation and evolution
scatter consistent with forming from large number of independent fragments
15
-
Outer Halo: dSph
Mateo 2008, Garching workshop
kpc
16
-
Formation of Halo?
Bullock & Johnston 2005 ApJ 635 931
17
-
& Sagittarius Milky Way
Evidence for merging...
18
-
The Local Grouphello
Mateo 2008, Garching workshop
kpcOuter regions: dominated by gas rich quiescently evolving dwarf irregulars
Near centres of mass: gas-less pressure supported dSphs
Anomalies: more distant dSph
19
-
Nearest Cluster
20
-
Local Super-Cluster
21
-
What is a galaxy cluster?Half the galaxies in the Universe are found in clusters or groups, systems of galaxies that are a few Mpc across.
Within the central Mpc, clusters typically contain 50-100 luminous galaxies (L> L* ~ 2 x 1010 L).
Most famous catalogues: Abell 1958 and it’s 1989 supplement, with 4073 rich clusters, having at least 30 giant members within a radius of ~1.5h-1Mpc.
Galaxies in clusters are bound together by their mutual gravitational attraction: the cluster is generally filled with hot interstellar gas, also retained by gravity.
Clusters differ from groups by having higher densities.
Cluster galaxies live in such proximity that they significantly affect each others development.
22
-
Galaxies in “field” vs. “cluster”
23
-
What causes diversity of galaxy types?
There are a number of ways of reducing the “variables” in a study of galaxy properties – and one is to look at a group or cluster of galaxies.
You remove uncertainties due to different distances of your sample of galaxies as well as different environments.
Your sample completeness is easily defined.
HOWEVER – it is not clear that you obtain a complete sample of all types of galaxies, and it may not even be a good “average” sample.
24
-
Virgo Cluster
closest rich cluster of galaxies, centred on giant elliptical galaxy M87
Velocity dispersion 715km/sVirial radius 730kpc~17Mpc distance
25
-
Virgo Cluster
~17Mpc distance, ~2000 member galaxies
Binggeli, Sandage & Tammann 1985
26
-
Global Properties
Bower et al. 1992
Brighter galaxies are redder
Elliptical galaxies in Virgo (open symbols) & Coma (closed symbols)Coma galaxies are shown 3.6 mag brighter as they would be at distance of Virgo
This trend could be explained if small elliptical galaxies were either younger or more metal poor than large bright ones (or both).
27
-
Virgo Cluster
VIVA: VLA Imaging of Virgo in Atomic gas28
-
ngc4522 in Virgo
Inter-cluster Medium
ngc4402 falling into centre of Virgo
29
-
Virgo Cluster
30
-
Ursa Major Group
Verheijen & Sancisi 2001
Velocity dispersion 148km/sVirial radius 880 kpc
Only late type galaxies with no particular concentration towards any centre
31
-
Global Properties
M. Verheijen 1997
Galaxies get bluer and fainter
Ursa Major Group
On average S0 galaxies are luminous and redSd, Sm systems are fainter and bluer
Studying a group: all galaxies at same distance, so the brightest are the most luminous
32
-
Global Properties
M. Verheijen 1997
Fainter galaxies have proportionately more HI
Ursa Major Group
Disk has lower central surface brightness
MH
I/LK
’ (s
olar
uni
ts)
Open circles, low SB galaxies (IK’(0) > 19.5), the least luminous and richest in HI; not efficient at turning HI into stars
33
-
Ursa Major Group vs. Virgo
Verheijen 2004
HI properties of late-type galaxies
HI /
opt
ical
di
amet
erH
I def
icie
ncy
Distance to cluster centre (degrees)
HI content of galaxies in centre of Virgo LESS than in the outskirts or in lower density systems (Ursa Major)
Gas disks are SMALLER in centre of Virgo than in the outskirts or in lower density systems (Ursa Major)
34
-
Fraction of E & Sp
Oemler 1974
First paper to quantify this effect.
com
pact
ness
trend of size with type
35
-
Morphology-Density RelationFirst large (55 clusters, 6000 galaxies) study of morphological segregation (Dressler 1980). The frequency of different galaxy types was found to vary as a function of the number density of galaxies in which they are found. Is this related to R? Or N? Difficult to ascertain: N ∝ R-1.
Dressler 1980 Effect of sub-structure?
Fraction Sp/E goes up moving out from cluster centre
fraction of Sp goes down with size of cluster.
galaxy type appears to be dictated by LOCAL DENSITY of galaxies, although presumably galaxies move through a range of densities, thus there must be coherent sub-structure.
study of poor groups (Postman & Geller 1984) - the centres of which have similar densities to outer regions of clusters follow same relations as clusters.
galaxies with a nearby companion are more likely to be Es (Whitmore, Gilmore & Jones 1993), so morphology-density a local phenomenon.
there is a single universal morphology-density relation over 6 orders of magnitude in density.
36
-
What causes diversity?Galaxies in clusters more likely to be Es or S0s than those in the field
Environment plays a role
Not all clusters are the same - large E fraction correlates to regular symmetric clusters; low values to “ratty” ones Oemler (1974)
Also E/Sp varies with position in a cluster -> depends on density.
Fraction of spirals increases out from centre; essentially no spirals in cluster cores
MORPHOLOGY-RADIUS RELATION
Spirals closer to the centre have less gas than those further away
Why? Spatial segregation should give rise to kinematic differences - ie., spirals follow more energetic orbits - ie., spirals at a given distance from centre of cluster should have larger random velocities than E
37
-
Simulating Interacting Systems
Toomre & Toomre 1972, ApJ
Lack of spirals compared to ellipticals in dense environments has lead people to consider that merging spirals result in an elliptical galaxy....
Josh Barnes 1998
38
-
Luminosity Functions
39
-
Galaxy luminosity functionJust as the distribution of stellar luminosities reflects the physics of star formation and stellar structure, we might hope to learn about galactic evolutionary processes by studying the distribution of galaxy luminosities.
The galaxy luminosity fn. Φ(M), Φ(M)dM is proportional to the number of galaxies that have absolute magnitudes in the range (M, M+dM):
Where ν is the total number of galaxies per unit volume
The field galaxy luminosity function, in its simplest form, involves measuring the apparent magnitudes of all the galaxies in some representative sample. The individual brightnesses are converted to absolute magnitudes by estimating the galaxies distances usually by applying the Hubble law to their observed redshifts.
40
-
Driver 2004 PASA, 21, 344
M* break luminosity
41
-
Short comingsMalmquist bias - magnitude limited surveys - luminosity function distorted if function has a finite spread in luminosity. Even if all galaxies have intrinsically identical luminosities , but a range of estimated absolute magnitudes due to errors in their adopted distances.
Estimating distances using Hubble law intrinsically approximate process. Particular problem for nearby galaxies - local motions dominate over Hubble flow. Particular problem for low luminosity galaxies - which can only be observed nearby. So faint end of luminosity fns remains rather poorly defined.
Spatial structure - incomplete sampling of variations in galaxy distribution (filaments vs. Voids).
42
-
In an attempt to find a general analytic fit to galactic luminosity functions, Schechter (1976) ApJ 203, p297 proposed the functional form:
Luminosity Functions of galaxies
Which can also be written (in terms of magnitudes):
In both forms α (the slope of the power-law at low luminosities) and L* (the break luminosity) are free parameters that are used to obtain the best fit to the available data.
Local: α= -1.0 and M*B = -21Virgo: α= -1.24 and M*B = -21 ± 0.7
i.e., this is NOT a universal luminosity function. It seems to depend upon environment.
A power law with a high luminosity exponential cut-off
43
-
44
-
Press-SchechterThus α sets the slope of the luminosity fn at the faint end L* or M* gives the characteristic luminosity above which the number of galaxies falls sharply and Φ* sets the overall normalisation of the galaxy density.
This formula was initially motivated by a simple model of galaxy formation (Press & Schechter 1974 ApJ 187 425), but has proved to have a wider range of application than originally envisaged.
Integration over previous eqn has limitation that it effectively predicts infinite number of small faint galaxies (alpha lies close to ~-1)
However we know universe is finite (dark sky)
When we can detect low lum galaxies, they exist in large numbers
45
-
Galaxy Counts
Number of galaxies Φ(M) per 10Mpc cube between absolute magnitude MR and MR + 1
Schechter function
46
-
Galaxy luminosity function in the Virgo cluster (Sandage, Binggeli & Tammann 1985, AJ 90, 1759)
bright faint
47
-
Galaxy cluster LFsDifferent environment. Easier to obtain LF members lie in small region of sky. So photometry can be obtained efficiently, and all members at same distance. Reducing distance errors. Only problem is rich clusters are rare. So typically at large distances. Making it hard to detect fainter members.
Faint end slope in cluster significantly steeper than in the field: encounters don’t end in mergers as often as in field – because relative velocities are higher in clusters
Jerjen & Tammann 1997
brightfaint
48
-
see: Thomas: ESO Astrophysics Symposia (1999)
49
-
Relative numbers of different typesB
inggeli, Sandage, Tam
mann A
RA
A (1988) AR
AA ,26, 509
The total luminosity function in either environment is the sum of the individual luminosity functions of each Hubble type.
Largest fraction in either environment of all galaxies are dwarfs (dE and Irr). Even though Sp and E the most prominent in terms of mass and luminosity.More E in Virgo...
All dIs and dEs
LF of cluster & local field broken down into different types
50
-
How to determine the mass of a galaxy?
51
-
Masses of galaxies
Rotation curves allow mass determination. The constant rotational velocities in the outer regions - suggests that mass increases linearly with distance from the centre. In stark contrast to the light distribution, which decreases exponentially over the same distance. Meaning a rapidly increasing mass-to-light ration (M/L) and a hidden dark matter halo in spiral galaxies (Bosma 1981).
Spiral Galaxies: application of Gauss’ theorem to Newton’s law of gravity:
Elliptical Galaxies: application of virial theorem, assuming isotropic stellar distribution
This kind of analysis has led to the prediction of large dark matter haloes around elliptical galaxies (e.g., Côte et al. 2001, 2003), using globular clusters as tracers. The line-of-sight velocity dispersion remains remarkably constant out to the limits of observation. This has the same explanation as flat rotation curves in HI. To bind globular clusters with large velocity dispersions at large radii means that the mass within R must increase proportional to R.
52
-
Rotation Curves of GalaxiesSurface Brightness profiles sample the distribution of luminous matter in a galaxy. This does not necessarily tell us about the mass of the galaxy - about the presence and amount of DARK MATTER. The most direct way to do this is via the rotation curve of the HI.
Bosma 1981
When rotation curves are compared with either luminosity or Hubble type a number of correlations are found:• for increasing LB rotation curves tend to rise more rapidly with distance from centre and peak at higher maximum velocity (Vmax).• for equal LB spirals of earlier type have larger Vmax.• within a given Hubble type more luminous galaxies have larger Vmax. • for a given value of Vmax the rotation curves tend to rise slightly more rapidly with radius for earlier type galaxies.
The fact that galaxies of different Hubble types, and therefore different bulge-to-disk luminosity ratios, exhibit rotation curves that are very similar in form if not in amplitude suggests that the shapes of the gravitational potential do not necessarily follow the distribution of luminous matter.
Vmax is significantly lower in Irrs (50-70km/s). This suggests that this is the minimum rotation speed required for the development of a well ordered spiral pattern
Tully-Fisher
53
-
Internal dynamics of EllipticalsSource of galaxies shape? It might be thought that the internal dynamics of elliptical galaxies would be relatively simple - the surface brightness distributions appear to be ellipsoidal, with a range of flattenings, which it might be thought could be attributed to rotation.This can be tested by measuring the mean velocities and velocity dispersions of the stars through out the body of a galaxy. These measurements can be compared with the rotation and internal velocity dispersions expected if the flattening can be attributed to rotation.
from Davies et al. 1983
Ellipticals rotate too slowly for centrifugal forces to be the causes of their observed flattening.
Solid line: amount of rotation necessary to account for observed ellipticity of galaxy relative to σ of stars. This means that the assumptions of
asymmetric spatial distribution and/or an isotropic velocity distribution of stars at all points within galaxy must be wrong.
TRIAXIAL SYSTEMS
this means a system with 3 unequal axes and consequently anisotropic stellar velocity distributions
54
-
Kroupa, Tout & Gilmore 1993 MNRAS, 262, 545
Converting luminosity to mass
PDMF (present day mass function) number of stars observed today per unit mass per unit volume. This needs to be corrected for the time evolution of the IMF up to the present day,
LF (luminosity function) currently observed number of stars observed per unit luminosity per unit volume
IMF (initial mass function) Ψ(m, t), number of stars formed per unit volume at t=0 often approximated as a power law: Ψ(m) dm = Ψ0 m-α
IMF
PDMF
high mass, short lived stars
low mass, long lived stars
StarFormationHistory
55
-
fin
56