1
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
2
Preface ....................................................................................................................................4
Natural Gas in the World Energy..............................................................................................5
Gazprom in the World Gas Industry ........................................................................................9
Gazprom and Russian Economy ............................................................................................12
Gazprom in Development, 2002–2006 ..................................................................................15
Share Capital, Dividends, Financial and Market Indicators ..............................................15
Resource Base ................................................................................................................18
Hydrocarbon Production ..................................................................................................33
Transportation and Storage..............................................................................................36
Technological Communications ......................................................................................42
Refining and Products......................................................................................................43
Marketing and Sales ........................................................................................................49
Corporate Immovable Property........................................................................................56
Innovation Activity............................................................................................................57
Energy Saving ..................................................................................................................58
Personnel ........................................................................................................................59
3
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
TABLE OF CONTENTS
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
Fact book «Gazprom in Figures 2002–2006» is an informational and statistical edition, prepared for OAO «Gazprom»annual General shareholders meeting 2007. It is aimed at providing figures about the company’s role in the world andRussian gas business as well as about company’s activities in 2002-2006 to shareholders and investors.
The Fact book is prepared on the basis of corporate reports and accounts of OAO «Gazprom», including figures of ear-lier annual reports, the issuer’s quarterly reports, offering circulars, as well as on the basis of Russian and foreignsources of publicly disclosed information
All the terms, explanations, admissions and restrictions of OAO «Gazprom» Annual report 2006 are valid in the pres-ent Fact book. In particular, the term OAO «Gazprom» refers to the head company of the Group, i.e. to Open Joint StockCompany «Gazprom». The Gazprom Group, the Group or Gazprom imply OAO «Gazprom», its subsidiaries and relat-ed companies taken as a whole.
Similarly, the term Gazprom Neft Group and Gazprom Neft imply OAO «Gazprom Neft» and its subsidiaries, the termSibur Holding refers to OAO «Sibur Holding» and its subsidiaries.
4
PREFACE
World Primary Energy Consumption by Energy Source, bln. tons of oil equivalent
World Natural Gas Production Forecast, bcm
5
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
NATURAL GAS IN THE WORLD ENERGY
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
02003 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Oil Natural gas Coal Nuclear power OthersSource: International Energy Outlook 2006.
5 500
5 000
4 500
4 000
3 500
3 000
2 500
2 0002003 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Source: Based on International Energy Outlook 2006 data.
2.3
2.9
2,694
3,286
3,792
4,234
4,6725,139
3.3 3.7
4.1
4.5
9.9
12.413.2
14.515.7
17.0
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
Annual Natural Gas Demand Growth up to 2030 by Regions, % per year
Annual Natural Gas Demand Growth up to 2030 by Selected Countries, % per year
6
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Source: International Energy Outlook 2006.
Africa South Near and Asia Europe Australia NorthAmerica Middle America
East
4.4
3.9
3.4
2.7
2
1.7
1.1
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Source: International Energy Outlook 2006.
China India Brazil South Korea Russia Japan USA
6.8
5.9
4.6
1.71.6
0.8 0.7
World Net Natural-Gas-Fired Electricity Generation in 2003–2030, bln. kilowatthours
World Natural Gas Consumption by Region, bcm
Region 2004 Share of total, % 2005 Share of total, % 2006 Share of total, %Russia 450.5 16.2 436.9 15.3 458.0 15.6North America 769.5 27.7 753.9 26.5 770.7 26.3South America 114.3 4.1 123.1 4.3 127.0 4.3Europe 651.4 23.5 664.3 23.3 640.4 21.9Africa 79.6 2.9 84.2 3.0 87.3 3.0Near and Middle East 250.8 9.0 271.9 9.5 280.6 9.6Asia 430.3 15.5 486.1 17.1 537.7 18.3Australia and Oceania 27.5 1.0 27.7 1.0 28.5 1.0Total 2,773.9 100.0 2,848.1 100.0 2,930.2 100.0Source: Based on 2006 Natural Gas Year in Review (Cedigaz, 2007); Natural Gas in the World, Trends and Figures in 2005 (Cedigaz, 2006).
7
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
02003 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
– Share of Natural Gas in Total Energy GenerationSource: International Energy Outlook 2006.
2.617.4 %
4.6423.3 %
5.8525.7 %
6.8826.9 %
7.8627.7 %
8.8928.2 %
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
Gas Reserves-to-Production Ratio
8
Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Quatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates,
Nigeria, Libia, Venezuela, Azerbaijan,Kazakhstan
Russia
Algeria, Egypt, Turkmenistan,Ukraine, Oman, Australia, China,
Malaysia
Netherlands, Norway, Uzbekistan,India, Indonesia
USA, Canada
More than 100 years
80 years
40–60 years
20–40 years
8–10 years
0 20 40 60 80 100
Countries with proved reserves of more than 1 tcm are included. Reserves-to-production (R/P) ratio – If thereserves remaining at the end of any year are divided by the production in that year, the result is the length of timethat those remaining reserves would last if production were to continue at that level.
Source: BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2006.
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
GAZPROM IN THE WORLD GAS INDUSTRY
9
Main Exporters of Natural Gas in 2006 (Pipelines and LNG)
Wolrd Oil and Gas Majors as of 31.12.2005
Russia (Gazprom) – 26.8 %
Canada – 11.3 %
Norway – 9.5 %
Algeria – 7.0 %
Netherlands – 5.5 %
Indonesia – 3.9 %
Quatar – 3.5 %
Malaysia – 3.4 %
Others – 29.1 %
Source: 2006 Natural Gas Year in Review (Cedigaz, 2007).
220
224
230
230
232
237
262
378
388
415
440781
National Iranian Oil (Iran)
Sonatrach (Algeria)
BP plc
Royal Dutch Shell plc
Petroliam Nasional Berhad (Petronas) (Malaysia)
PetroChina Company (China)
Gazprom (Russia)
Kuwait Petroleum Corporation(Kuwait)
Petroleos de Venezuela SA
Petroleos Mexicanos (Pemex)
ExxonMobilCorporation
Saudi Aramco0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Public companies Non-public companies
Market capitalization is shown for publicly listed companies, for non-public (state-owned) companies –market value estimations made by «McKinsey & Company».Source: «McKinsey & Company».
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
10
4.2
%
3.8
%
4.3
%
8.0
%
40.5
%
11.0
%
1.7
%
26.5
% (G
azpr
om –
16.
5 %
)
Wor
ld P
rove
d Na
tura
l Gas
Res
erve
s by
Reg
ion
as o
f 01.
01.2
006,
tcm
North
Sout
hEu
rope
Afric
aNe
arRu
ssia
Asia
Aust
ralia
Tota
lAm
eric
aAm
eric
aan
dM
iddl
e(G
azpr
om)
and
East
Ocea
nia
7.57
6.95
7.74
14.4
173
.02
47.8
2 (2
9.85
)19
.95
3.0
180.
46
Sour
ce: 2
006
Nat
ural
Gas
Yea
r in
Revi
ew(C
edig
az, 2
007)
, Gaz
prom
data
.
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
Mar
kete
d Pr
oduc
tion
of N
atur
al G
as b
y Re
gion
in 2
006,
bcm
North
Sout
h Eu
rope
Afric
aNe
ar
Russ
iaAs
iaAu
stra
liaTo
tal
Amer
ica
Amer
ica
and
Mid
dle
(Gaz
prom
)an
d Oc
eani
aEa
st75
414
332
719
132
865
6 (5
56)
484
472,
930
1.6
%
22.4
% (G
azpr
om –
19.
0 %
)
16.5
%
11.2
%
6.5
%
4.9
%
11.2
%25
.7 %
Sour
ce: 2
006
Nat
ural
Gas
Yea
r in
Revi
ew(C
edig
az, 2
007)
, Gaz
prom
data
.
11
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
12
Role of Gazprom in the Russian National Economic Indicators, 2006
Indicators Share, %GNP share 10.6Natural gas reserves controlled More than 60National gas production 84.7Oil and condensate production 9.5Source: based on Federal State Statistics Service and Gazprom data.
Gas Reserves Structure in Russia as of 31.12.2006
Volume, tcm Share, %Gazprom (controlled reserves) 29.85 62.4Independent producers 10.2 21.3Undistributed fund 7.8 16.3Total 47.85 100
Fuel and Energy Consumption Structure in Russia, 2006
GAZPROM AND RUSSIAN ECONOMY
Natural Gas – 51.2 %
Oil and Products – 21.7 %
Coal – 14.7 %
Hydro and Nuclear Power – 10.3 %
Others* – 2,1 %
* Include peat, oil shale, fuelwood, forestry waste, biomass energy, wind energy, geothermal energy and others.
13
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
GAZPROM’S PARTICIPATION IN «GAZIFICATION»* OF RUSSIAN REGIONS
Length of Gas Distribution Pipelines, Serviced by Gazprom Group, thousand km
Numbers of Flats and Private Dwellings with Natural Gas Supply, «Gazified» by Gazprom, million
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
2003 2004 2005 2006
*Gazification – construction of low pressure gas pipelines to ensure gas supply to the ultimate consumers
428
485
463
514
26
25
24
23
22
21
20
2003 2004 2005 2006
22.8
25.125.6
26.1
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
14
Number of Utilities Plants with Natural Gas Supply, «Gazified» by Gazprom, thousand
Number of Industrial Plants with Natural Gas Supply, «Gazified» by Gazprom, thousand
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
2003 2004 2005 2006
132.8
149.2 159.8
173.4
20
15
10
5
0
2003 2004 2005 2006
12.213.7
14.615.9
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
GAZPROM IN DEVELOPMENT, 2002–2006
SHARE CAPITAL, DIVIDENDS, FINANCIAL AND MARKET INDICATORS
Share Capital Structure of OAO «Gazprom», %
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006Shareholding controlled by the Russian Federation, 39.262 39.262 39.262 50.002 50.002
including:Federal Agency for Federal Property Management 38.373 38.373 38.373 38.373 38.373OAO «Rosgazifikatsiya» 0.889 0.889 0.889 0.889 0.889OAO «Rosneftegaz» - - - 10.740 10.740
ADR holders 4.422 4.422 4.422 4.422 13.200Other registered entities 56.316 56.316 56.316 45.576 36.798Total 100.0 100.0 100,0 100,0 100,0
OAO «Gazprom» Share Close Price at St. Petersburg Stock Exchange, roubles per share
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
02002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Maximum Minimum At the end of the year
35.4524.0215.64
44.4538.521.1
84.776.5740.55
195194.369.6
350.38302.5215
15
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
16
OAO «Gazprom» ADR Close Price at London Stock Exchange*, $
OAO «Gazprom» Average Market Capitalization*, bln. $
250
200
150
100
50
0
* In accordance with the OAO «Gazprom» dividend policy, market capitalization in this Fact book is calculated as the sum of thearithmetic average of the daily market capitalization of the internal market and the arithmetic average of the daily market capitaliza-tion of the external market.
20.4326.99
+32.1 %
54.24+101 %
91.13+68 %
239.33+162.6 %
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
* Considering the new ratio of 1 ADR = 4 OAO «Gazprom» ordinary shares.
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Maximum Minimum At the end of the year
7.864.683.88
10.910.364.16
15.7614.210.5
31.428.6811.92
52.6446.0
29.48
17
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
Market value growth by 163 % in 2006 resulted in OAO «Gazprom» leadership among the European companies interms of market capitalization level and its second ranking among the world largest energy companies according tothis criterion. Along with OAO «Gazprom» share market liberalization this led to the fact than since June 1, 2006,OAO «Gazprom» shares began to be taken into account for the purpose of the MSCI Emerging Markets index calcu-lated by Morgan Stranley Capital International Investment Bank. This index is formed on the basis of 850 emergingmarket companies among which OAO «Gazprom» shares has the largest weight (4.5–6.0 % in 2006). The successivecompanies – «Samsung Electronics», OAO «NK Lukoil», «Taiwan Semiconductor», «Petrobras» – had 1.5–3 timeslesser weights in the index.
Divedend Dynamics
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006(recommended)
0.4
0.69+72.5 %
1.19+72.5 %
1.5+26.1 %
2.54+69.3 %
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
18
OAO «Gazprom» financial and Market Ratios
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006Return on equity, %* 3.34 7.60 8.70 6.08 9.40Return on assets, %* 2.40 5.65 6.41 4.79 7.55Return on sales, %* 18.03 26.59 23.85 29.09 31.72Current liquidity ratio * 1.41 1.84 3.04 3.35 2.96Quick ratio * 1.18 1.54 2.52 2.67 2.35Equity/assets ratio * 0.72 0.74 0.74 0.79 0.80Debt to capital ratio, % 24.4 22.4 23.7 20.23 16.90P/E ratio(domestic OAO «Gazprom» share market) 10.93 6.30 11.29 22.65
20.83P/E ratio(external OAO «Gazprom» share market) 16.89 12.67 14.49 24.06Market capitalization, $ bln 20.43 26.99 54.24 91.13 239.33Market capitalization/net assets 0.41 0.49 0.84 0.77 1.77* Calculated in accordance with the Regulation on information disclosure by securities issuers approved by Order of the Federal Financial Markets Service
№ 06-117/pz-n dated October 10, 2006.
RESOURCE BASE
Licenses
Exploration and production of the subsoil resources in Russian Federation are subjected to state licensing. Most ofGazprom Group licenses to study, explore and produce hydrocarbons were received in 1993-1996 in accordance with theSubsoil Resources Law. Majority licenses expire after 2012.
Since Gazprom Group license holders are in material compliance with license agreements, they are entitled to receive anextension of existing licenses to complete exploration or to finish the development of the field. Gazprom plans to extendits license agreements to the full economic lives of the associated fields upon the expiration of their primary terms.
Gazprom Group Licenses to Study, Explore and Produce Hydrocarbons by Type
250
200
150
100
50
0
Exploration Exploration, Explorationand production asessment and production and assesment
2005 2006
197228
4329
125
5940
129
19
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
Gazprom Group Licenses as of 31.12.2006
NN Type of license, pcsLicense holderExploration Exploration Exploration Seach for Total
and assesment and sites,production and assesment construction
production and operationof underground
storagefacilities
1 OAO Gazprom 4 5 19 7 352 OOO Astrakhangazprom 1 1 - 1 33 OOO Kaspiygazprom - 4 3 - 74 OOO Kavkaztransgaz 13 - 3 1 175 OOO Kubangazprom 34 3 1 2 406 OOO Nadymgazprom 6 - 5 - 117 OOO Noyabrskgazdobycha 5 - 1 - 68 OOO Purgazdobycha - 1 - - 19 OOO Orenburggazprom 1 1 9 5 1610 OOO Severgazprom 4 - 5 - 911 OOO Surgutgazprom 1 1 - - 212 OOO Tyumentransgaz 3 - - 1 413 ООО Uraltransgaz - 1 1 - 214 OOO Urengoigazprom 3 - - - 315 OOO Yamburggazdobycha 2 1 - - 316 OAO Severneftegazprom 1 - - - 117 ОАО Vostokgazprom - 3 - - 318 OAO Tomskgazprom 5 - - - 519 ОАО Sevmorneftegaz 2 - - - 220 ZAO Stimul 1 - - - 121 ООО Bashtransgaz - - - 2 222 ООО Volgogradtransgaz - - - 1 123 ООО Volgotransgaz - - - 1 124 ООО Lentransgaz - - - 2 225 ООО Mostransgaz - - - 4 426 ООО Permtransgaz - - - 1 127 ООО Samaratransgaz - - - 4 428 ООО Yugtransgaz - - - 3 329 OAO Krasnoyarskgazprom - - 1 - 130 ООО Krasnoyarskgazdobycha 1 2 1 - 431 ООО Serviceneftegaz 1 1 - - 232 OAO Uralneft - 2 - - 233 ZAO Purgaz 1 - - - 134 Group Zarubezhneftegaz - 2 - - 235 Group Gazprom Neft 40 12 10 - 62
Total 129 40 59 35 263
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
20
Affiliated Companies Licenses as of 31.12.2006
NN Type of license, pcsLicense holderExploration Exploration Exploration Seach for Total
and assesment and sites,production and assesment construction
production and operationof underground
storagefacilities
1. ZAO Pechorneftegazprom 5 - - - 52. OOO CentrCaspneftegaz - - 1 - 13. OAO Uralneftegazprom 6 - - - 64. OAO Yuzhnaya NK - 2 - - 25. ООО Caspiyskaya NK - - 1 - 16. ZAO Nortgaz 1 - - - 17. Group Slavneft 27 11 1 - 39
Total 39 13 3 - 55
Licenses Expiration Dates of Gazprom Group Main Hydrocarbon Fields
License holder Name of the field Type of the field License expirationyear
OAO Gazprom Severo-Purovskoye gas condensate 2026Zapadno-Astrakhanskoye gas condensate 2024Dolginskoye oil 2025Severo-Kamennomysskoye gas condensate 2026Kamennomysskoye-more gas 2026Obskoye gas 2026
OOO Astrakhangazprom Astrakhanskoye gas condensate 2019OOO Nadymgazprom Medvezhye gas condensate 2018
Yubileinoye oil-gas condensate 2018Yamsoveiskoye oil-gas condensate 2018Kharasaveiskoye gas condensate 2019Bovanenkovskoye oil-gas condensate 2019Novoportovskoye oil-gas condensate 2019
OOO Noyabrskgazdobycha Vyngapurovskoye (Cenomanian) oil-gas condensate 2012Komsomolskoye(Cenomanian) oil-gas condensate 2012Yety-Purovskoye(Cenomanian) oil-gas condensate 2014Vyngayakhinskoye(Cenomanian) gas-oil 2019
OOO Orenburggazprom Orenburgskoye oil-gas condensate 2018OOO Purgazdobycha Zapadno-
Tarkosalinskoye oil-gas condensate 2018OOO Severgazprom Vuktylskoe oil-gas condensate 2016OAO Severneftegazprom Yuzhno-Russkoye oil-gas 2018ZAO Stimul Orenburgskoye
(eastern section) oil-gas condensate 2018
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
OOO Urengoigazprom Urengoiskoye oil-gas condensate 2013Yen-Yakhinskoye oil-gas condensate 2013Severo-Urengoiskoye(Cenomanian) oil-gas condensate 2013Pestsovoye oil-gas condensate 2019
OOO Yamburggazdobycha Yamburgskoye oil-gas condensate 2018Zapolarnoye oil-gas condensate 2018Tazovskoye oil-gas condensate 2025
OAO Tomskgazprom Myldzhinskoye gas condensate 2019ООО Krasnoyarsk-gazdobycha Sobinskoye oil-gas condensate 2028ОАО Sevmorneftegaz Shtokmanovskoye gas condensate 2018
Prirazlomnoye oil 2018ZAO Purgaz Gubkinskoye oil-gas condensate 2014ОАО Gazprom Neft Muravlenkovskoye oil-gas condensate 2013
Novogodneye oil-gas condensate 2013Priobskoye (southern area) oil-gas condensate 2013Sporyshevskoye oil-gas condensate 2047Sugmutskoye oil-gas condensate 2050Sutorminskoye oil-gas condensate 2013Vyngapurovskoye 2013(Yamalo-Nenetski AO),
oil-gas condensate Vyngapurovskoye(Khanty-Mansiyski AO) 2014Vyngayakhinskoye oil-gas condensate 2013
Exploration Activities
Gazprom Group is currently engaged in the exploration for new hydrocarbon deposits in Russia and abroad. The bulkof this activity is concentrated in six federal districts (FD) of Russian Federation: Urals (Yamalo-Nenetski AO, Khanty-Mansiski AO, Sverdlovsk region), North-Western FD (Nenetski AO, Komi Republic), Southern FD (Astrakhan region,Krasnodarsky krai, Stavropolsky krai), Privolzhsky FD (Orenburg region), Siberian FD (Tomsk region, Irkutsk region,Krasnoyarsky krai), Far Eastern FD (Chukotka). Foreign projects include Gazprom activities in India, Vietnam,Venezuela, Kazahkstan, Uzbekistan, Tadjikistan, Kyrgystan.
Major Exploration Metrics
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006Exploration well drilling, thousand m 60.4 79.5 130.6 149.4 182.22D seismic survey, thousand km 10.5 10.0 8.3 10.4 9.63D seismic survey, thousand square km 0.7 2.3 2.3 3.2 7.9Gas reserves growth due to exploration, bcm 499.2 426.8 378.1 583.4 590.9Oil and condensate reserves growth due to exploration, million tons 21.5 9.6 17.2 33.0 58.8Drilling efficiency, tce / m 10,131 5,866 3,157 4,522 3,657
21
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
22
New Fields Discovered by Gazprom in 2002–2006
Name of the field Location Type Year of discoverySredne-Nadymskoye Yamalo-Nenetski AO oil 2002Yuzhno-Pestsovoye Yamalo-Nenetski AO gas condensate 2002Chugoryakhinskoye Yamalo-Nenetski AO gas 2002Lenskoye Yamalo-Nenetski AO gas condensate 2002Grechanoe Krasnodarsky krai gas 2002Chernoerkovskoye Krasnodarsky krai oil-gas condensate 2002Obskoye Western Siberia gas 2003Yuzhno-Chernoerkovskoye Krasnodarsky krai gas-oil 2003Peschanoe Krasnodarsky krai gas-oil 2003Beryambinskoye Krasnoyarsky krai gas condensate 2004Ninelskoye Yamalo-Nenetski AO oil 2004Zapadno-Kazachye Krasnodarsky krai gas 2004Vostochno-Peschanoe Orenburg region oil 2004Severo-Yuguidskoye Komi Republic oil-gas condensate 2005Zapadno-Astrakhanskoye Astrakhan region gas condensate 2005Kutymskoye Western Siberia gas-oil 2005Chikanskoye Irkutsk region gas condensate 2006Akobinskoye Orenburg region gas condensate 2006Karmalinovskoye Stavropolsky krai gas condensate 2006Yuzhno-Noyabrskoye Yamalo-Nenetski AO oil 2006
Reserves
Main Differences Between Russian Reserves System and International Standards
Hydrocarbon reserves of the Gazprom Group are estimated using both the Russian reserves system and methodolo-gies developed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers («SPE International Standards») and by the Securities andExchange Commission (“SEC Standards”). Since 1997, DeGolyer and MacNaughton, an independent U.S. petroleumengineering consulting firm, has evaluated Gazprom’s reserves according to international standards. In 2006 GazpromNeft reserves were audited by Miller and Lents.
The Russian reserves system differs significantly from the internationally accepted classifications in particular withrespect to the manner in which and the extent to which commercial factors are taken into account in calculatingreserves.
The Russian Reserves System
The Russian reserves system is based solely on an analysis of the geological attributes of reserves and take into con-sideration the actual physical presence of hydrocarbons in geological formations or the probability of such physicalpresence. Explored reserves are represented by categories A, B, and C1; preliminary estimated reserves are repre-sented by category C2; prospective resources are represented by category C3; and forecasted resources are repre-sented by the categories D1 and D2.
Natural gas reserves in categories A, B and C1 are considered to be fully extractable. For reserves of oil and gas con-densate, a predicted coefficient of extraction is calculated based on geological and technical factors.
Category A reserves are calculated on the part of a deposit drilled in accordance with an approved development proj-ect for the oil or natural gas field. They represent reserves that have been analyzed in sufficient detail.
23
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
Category B represents the reserves of a deposit (or portion thereof), the oil or gas content of which has been deter-mined on the basis of commercial flows of oil or gas obtained in wells at various hypsometric depths. The main param-eters and the major features of the deposit that determine the conditions of its development have been studied insufficient detail to draw up a project to develop the deposit.
Category C1 represents the reserves of a deposit (or of a portion thereof), the oil or gas content of which has beendetermined on the basis of commercial flows of oil or gas obtained in wells and positive results of geophysical explo-ration of non-probed wells. Category C1 reserves are computed on the basis of results of geophysical exploration workand production drilling and must have been studied in sufficient detail to yield data from which to draw up either a trialindustrial development project in the case of a natural gas field or a technological development scheme in the case ofan oil field.
Gazprom’s “proved” reserves are valuated according to SEC Standards, and “probable” and “possible” reserves -according to SPE International Standards
SPE International Standards
SPE International Standards take into account not only the probability that hydrocarbons are physically present in agiven geological formation but also the economic viability of recovering the reserves. Exploration and drilling costs,ongoing production costs, transportation costs, taxes, prevailing prices for the products, and other factors that influ-ence the economic viability of a given deposit are taken into consideration.
Under SPE International Standards, Reserves are Classified as Proved, Probable and Possible.
Proved reserves include reserves that are confirmed with a high degree of certainty through an analysis of the devel-opment history and/or volume method analysis of the relevant geological and engineering data. Proved reserves arethose that have a better than 90 % chance of being produced.
Probable reserves are those reserves in which hydrocarbons have been located within the geological structure with alesser degree of certainty because fewer wells have been drilled and/or certain operational tests have not been con-ducted. Probable reserves are those reserves that have a better than 50 % chance of being produced.
An evaluation of proved and probable natural gas reserves naturally involves multiple uncertainties. The accuracy ofany reserves evaluation depends on the quality of available information and engineering and geological interpretation.Based on the results of drilling, testing and production after the audit date, reserves may be significantly restatedupwards or downwards. Changes in the price of natural gas, gas condensate or oil may also affect proved and proba-ble reserves estimates, as well as estimates of future net revenues and present worth, because the reserves are evalu-ated, and the future net revenues and present worth are estimated, based on prices and costs as of the audit date.
Differences between SPE International Standards and SEC Standards
Certainty of Existence. Under SPE International Standards, reserves in undeveloped drilling sites that are located morethan one well location from a commercial producing well may be classified as proved reserves if there is “reasonablecertainty” that they exist. Under SEC Standards, it must be “demonstrated with certainty” that reserves exist beforethey may be classified as proved reserves. In their evaluation of Gazprom’s proved reserves DeGolyer andMacNaughton has applied the stricter SEC Standards with respect to certainty of existence.
Duration of License. Under SPE International Standards, proved reserves are projected to the economic production lifeof the evaluated fields. Under SEC Standards, oil and gas deposits may not be classified as proved reserves if they willbe recovered after the expiration of a current license period unless the license holder has the right to renew the licenseand there is a demonstrated history of license renewal. The Subsoil Resources Law provides that a license holder shallbe entitled to receive an extension of an existing license where extractable reserves remain upon the expiration of the
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
24
primary term of the license, provided that the license holder is in material compliance with the license agreement.Gazprom prepares and submits for government approval development plans for its fields based on the economic lifeof the field, even where this life exceeds the primary term of the associated license. Gazprom is in material compliancewith license agreements, and will be entitled to extend them to the full economic lives of the associated fields upon theexpiration of their primary terms.
However, the absence of an absolute legal right to extension and a significant demonstrated history of extensionmakes it uncertain whether extractable reserves Gazprom plans to recover after the expiration of a current licenseperiod may be considered proved reserves under SEC Standards. SEC experts have not provided definitive guidance onwhether in these circumstances such extractable reserves could be considered proved under SEC Standards.
Gazprom’s Natural Gas Reserves (Categories A+B+C1), tcm
30
29.5
29
28.5
28
27.5
27
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
28.0
28.929.13
29.85
28.2
25
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
Gazprom Liquid Hydrocarbons Reserves (Categories A+B+C1), billion tons
International Audit of Gazprom’s Hydrocarbon Reserves (in Comparison With Russian Reserve System)
1,4
1,2
1
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Gas condensate Oil
1.28 1.28
0.56 0.570.65
1.36 1.39
1.23 1.22 1.22
31.12.2002 31.12.2003 31.12.2004 31.12.2005 31.12.2006
Reserves, evaluated Category International Category International Category International Category International Category International
to international A+B+C1 standards A+B+C1 standards A+B+C1 standards A+B+C1 standards A+B+C1 standards
standards reserves (proved and reserves (proved and reserves (proved and reserves (proved and reserves (proved and
entered probable) entered probable) entered probable) entered probable) entered probable)
into audit into audit into audit into audit into audit
Gazprom’s hydrocarbon reserves (Gazporm Neft non included)
Natural gas, tcm 25.2 18.7 25.3 18.5 27.7 20.9 27.6 20.66 27.8 20.73
Gas condensate,
million tons 1,144.2 515.8 1,142.7 588.2 1,095.2 654.84 1,094.3 692.6 1,096.3 658.99
Oil, million tons 362.4 106.5 383.9 132.5 496.2 235.96 565.2 299.5 585.4 290.88
Gazprom Neft’s hydrocarbon reserves
Crude oil,
million tons - - - - - - 699.96 932.2 723.1 775.6
Natural gas, tcm - - - - - - - 0.15 - 0.03
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
26
Gazprom’s Natural Gas Reserves (Categories A+B+C1) by Major Fields (as of 31.12.2006)
Barents sea
Caspian sea
Shtokmanovskoye3.2
Kara sea
Kharasaveiskoye1.3
Bovanenkovskoye4.4
Severo-Kamennomysskoye0.4
Kamennomysskoye-more0.5
Yamburgskoye3.8
Urengoiskoye5.3
Zapolarnoye3.2Yuzhno-Russkoye0.8
Medvezhye0.5
Yamsoveiskoye0.4
Komsomolskoye0.4
Orenburgskoye0.8Astrakhanskoye
2.5
Producingfields
Fieldsunder development
Reserves, tcm3.2
27
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
Territory Distribution of Gazprom’s Gas Reserves (Categories A+B+C1)
Annual Natural Gas Reserves Increment Due to Geological Exploration, bcm
Urals – 73.5 %
Arctic shelf – 13.8 %
Southern FD – 8.7 %
Privolzhsky FD – 2.7 %
Siberian FD – 1.0 %
Other territories – 0.3 %
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
499.2
426.8378.1
583.4 590.9
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
28
Natural Gas Reserves Growth-to-Production Ratio
1.1
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
0.9
0.8
0.7
1.05
1.06
29
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
Drilling
Construction of exploration and production wells in the fields and underground storage facilities by Gazprom Grouprequest is accomplished by: OOO Burgas – general contractor, ОАО Podzemburgaz, ООО Gazflot, drilling units of ООО Kavkaztransgaz, ООО Kaspiygazprom, ОАО Uraltransgaz, third-party drilling contractors.
Well Construction, units
Annual Total Penetration, thousand m
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
02002 2003 2004 2005 2006*
Exploration wells Production wells
* Including Gazprom Nefts figures.
46
242
309
453
299
638
24 4260 66
2 500
2 000
1 500
1 000
500
02002 2003 2004 2005 2006*
* Including Gazprom Nefts figures.
324 498 707 539
1 948
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
30
Gazprom’s Off-shore Exploration and Production Projects Abroad
India
Exploration Drilling and Seismic Survey Region in India (Block 26)
Project purpose and description: Search, exploration and production of hydrocarbons in the block NEC-OSN-97/1(№ 26) of the Indian shelf in the Bay of Bengal.
Project start: 2000 Legal basis and participants: Production sharing agreement between the Government of India, OAO “Gazprom” and
Gas Authority of India, Ltd. dated 03.10.2000, as well as the working Agreement between participants, dated07.06.2001.
Gazprom Group share: 50 %Total reserves estimate: 248-367 million toeMain events of 2006: GG-1 well (2,400 m depth) was drilled. Geological pattern of NW-1 object was confirmed.
Location of the second well (4,400 m depth) in object NEC-FA-5 was fixed.
India
Bangladesh
Myanmar
Block 26
Bay of Bengal
Madras
Vishakhapatnam
Calcutta
31
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
Venezuela
Deposit Blocks Urumaco-I and Urumaco-II on Venezuelan Shelf
Project purpose and description: Project «RAFAEL–URDANETA, Phase А»; geological research and gas field devel-opment of the license deposit blocks Urumaco-I and Uru-maco-II in the eastern part of Gulf of Venezuela.
Project start: 2005Legal basis and participants: License №334 dated October 4, 2005 (block Urumaco-I), License №336 dated October
4, 2005 (block Urumaco-II). Licences for geological research and gas field development are valid until 2030. Two com-panies Urdanetagazprom-1, S.A. and Urdanetagazprom-2, S.A. were established to realize this project.
Total reserves estimate: block Urumaco-I: 2.2 – 36.5 bcm of natural gas, block Urumaco-II: 5.3 – 136.7 bcm ofnatural gas.
Main events of 2006: Realization of the first stage of geological research - 3D seismic survey – began. First work-ings to drill exploration wells started.
Caribbean Sea
Colombia
Venezuela
Urumaco-I
Urumaco-II
Aruba (Neth.)
Curacao (Neth.)
Punto Fijo
Coro
Caracas
San Lorenzo
Maracaibo
Lagode Maracaibo
Gulf ofVenezuela
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
32
Vietnam
Exploration Drilling and Siesmic Survey Region in Vietman (Blocks 112 and 113)
Project purpose and description: Search, exploration, production and sales of hydrocarbons in the Block 112 (Bach-Chi Elevation) of the Vietnamese shelf according to production sharing agreement.
Project start: 2000 Legal basis and participants: Oil and gas contract concerning Block №112 of continental shelf of the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam dated 11.09.2000. Production sharing agreement between VNK Petrovietnam, ОАО “Gazprom”,NKPV Petrovietnam and ZAO Zarubezhneftegaz. Project operator – joint enterprise Vietgazprom.
Gazprom Group share: 50 %Total reserves estimate: Bao Den structure – 107.6 bcm, including 68 bcm of hydrocarbon gas.Main events of 2006: Coordinates of the second exploration well VGP-113-BD-1X (depth 2,500 m) in Bao Den
object and the third exploration well VGP-113-BV-1X in Bao Vang object were fixed. Drilling was launched inNovember, 2006.
VietnamChinaFangCheng
HaiphongHanoi
Vinh
Hue
Da Nang
Bao Vang
Bao Den
Bao ChangBau Nau
Exploration wells
South China Sea
Gulf of Tonkin
Hainan Dao (China)
33
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
HYDROCARBON PRODUCTION
Gazprom’s Natural Gas Production, bcm
Gas Production in 2006 by Major OAO «Gazprom» Subsidiaries
560
550
540
530
520
510
0
* In order to provide for the comparability of data the figures for 2002–2006 were restated using the mothodology compliant with the principles for preparing Gazprom Group’s consolidated accounting (financial) statements.
525.6
547.6552.5
555556
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Yamburggazdobycha – 41.5 %
Urengoigazprom – 25.0 %
Nadymgazprom – 11.3 %
Noyabrskgazdobycha – 9.5 %
Others – 12.7 %
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
34
Gazprom’s Liquid Hydrocarbons Production*, million tons
Gazprom Group Production Capacity
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006Producing fields 73 75 78 114 119Gas production wells 5,854 6,190 6,652 6,941 7,010including those in operation 5,402 5,736 6,094 6,401 6,513
Oil production wells 242 257 375 5,018 5,486including those in operation 201 211 202 4,372 4,948
Comprehensive and preliminary gas treatment plants (CGTU and PGTU) 155 158 161 169 170CGTU aggregate design capacity, bcm per year 766.5 840.3 909.0 939.6 957.8Booster compressor stations (BCS) 36 40 41 44 44BCS installed capacity, MW 3,209.0 3,704.1 3,956.1 4,176.1 4,176.1
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
00.7
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Crude oil Gas condensate* Gazprom Neft’s data are included starting from the 4th quarter of 2005.
0.8 0.9
9.5
34
9.9 10.2 11.1 11.5 11.4
35
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
Gazprom’s Hydrocarbon Production by Russian Regions in 2006
Volume Share of total, % Urals federal district
Natural gas, bcm 517.9 93.2Gas condensate, million tons 6.3 55.3Crude oil, million tons 31.9 93.8
Privolzhsky federal districtNatural gas, bcm 18.6 3.3Gas condensate, million tons 0.3 2.6Crude oil, million tons 0.6 1.8
Southern federal districtNatural gas, bcm 13.4 2.4Gas condensate, million tons 4.3 37.7Crude oil, million tons 0.1 0.3
Siberian federal districtNatural gas, bcm 3.3 0.6Gas condensate, million tons 0.3 2.6Crude oil, million tons 1.3 3.8
North-Western federal districtNatural gas, bcm 2.8 0.5Gas condensate, million tons 0.2 1.8Crude oil, million tons 0.1 0.3
Far Eastern federal districtNatural gas, bcm 0.028 0.0Gas condensate, million tons - -Crude oil, million tons - -
TotalNatural gas, bcm 556.0 100.0Gas condensate, million tons 11.4 100.0Crude oil, million tons 34.0 100.0
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
36
TRANSPORTATION AND STORAGE
Transportation
Creation of Gazprom’s gas transportation system (GTS) started more than 60 years ago with the launch of the first gaspipeline Saratov-Moscow. Major part of GTS was constructed during 1970–1990. Currently Gazprom is the sole ownerand operator of the Unified Gas Supply System of Russia, which provides collection, preparation, storage, and trans-portation of nearly the total amount of produced natural gas to Russian regions and to neighboring and distant foreigncountries.
Length of Trunk Pipelines and Pipeline Branches (in Signle-Lane Measuring), thousand km
Pipeline Annual Putting Into Operation, km
1 900
1 700
1 500
1 300
1 100
900
700
500
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
158
156
154
152
150
148
146
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
149.9
151.6
152.8155
156.9
818
1 786
1 014
1 402 1 526
37
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
Trunk Pipelines Structure by Tubes Diameter
Gazprom GTS’s Installed Equipment
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Pipeline compressor stations 203 207 207 210 217Gas pumping units 3,560 3,559 3,543 3,549 3,629including:
gas turbine units 2,784 2,787 2,816 2,822 2,952electric drive units 708 704 680 682 677Installed capacity of pumping units, thousand MW 39.0 39.1 39.4 42.8 41.0
Total Amount of Gas Received by GTS, bcm
720
710
700
690
680
670
660
2004 2005 2006
684.4
699.7
717.8
1.42 m – 34.3 %
1.22 m – 16.3 %
1.02 m – 10.9 %
Less than 1 m – 38.5 %
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
38
Ure
ng
oi
Sur
gut
Tyum
en
Yug
ors
k
Per
egre
bn
oe
Ukh
ta
Per
m
Ast
ana
Bis
hke
k
Tash
ken
t
Dus
han
be
Kab
ul
Ash
gab
at
Bak
uYe
reva
n
Tbili
si
An
kara
Ro
sto
v
Ale
ksan
drov
Gai
Frol
ovo
Nov
opsk
ov
Kis
hine
v
Buk
hare
st
Sof
ia
Sko
pje
Tira
na
Sar
aevoB
elgr
ad
Zag
reb
Bud
apes
tB
rati
slav
aV
ienn
a
Pra
ha
War
saw
Tula
Yele
tsP
etro
vskK
azan
Ufa
Ore
nbur
g
Mos
cow
Vos
kres
ensk
Gry
azov
ets
Sai
nt-P
eter
sbur
gV
ybor
gH
elsi
nki
Sto
ckho
lm
Osl
o
Cop
enha
gen
Ber
linB
russ
els
Par
is
Ber
n
Ljub
ljana
Lond
onA
mst
erda
m
Dub
lin
Rig
aTalli
n
Torz
hok
Torz
hok
Viln
ius
Min
sk
Lisb
onM
adri
d
Rab
at
Alg
iers
Val
lett
a
Trip
oli
Ast
rakh
an
Nor
weg
ian
Sea
Nor
th S
ea
Bal
tic
Sea
Bay
of
Bis
cay
Med
iter
rani
an S
ea
Bla
ck S
ea
Cas
pian
Sea
Bar
ents
Sea
Maj
or g
as p
ipel
ines
Gazprom’s
pri
orit
y ga
s tr
ansp
orta
tion
pro
ject
s
«Nor
d S
trea
m»
Gry
azov
ets
– V
ybor
g
SR
TO –
Tor
zhok
Sok
hran
ovka
– O
ktya
brsk
aya
pipe
line
Kas
imov
skoy
e U
GS
F –
Vos
kres
ensk
pip
elin
e
Exp
ansi
on o
f th
e U
reng
oi g
as t
rans
port
atio
n no
dal p
oint
Gas
fie
lds
Maj
or u
nder
grou
nd s
tora
ge f
acili
ties
(U
GS
F)
Maj
or g
as r
efin
erie
s
Act
ing
LNG
ter
min
als
Per
spec
tive
LN
G t
erm
inal
s
Eura
sian
Gas
Tra
nspo
rtatio
n Sy
stem
39
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
Gazprom’s Priority Gas Transportation Projects
SRTO – Torzhok
SRTO – Torzhok pipeline is intended for transportation of gas from the fields located in north of Tyumen region to thevicinities of Torzhok, where one of the UGSS’s node points is located. Gas pipeline will make it possible to increasegas supply to the consumers in the North-Western region of Russia and gas export through the Yamal-Europe pipeline.As of December 31, 2006, the linear part of the gas pipeline with a total length of more than 2,000 km was commis-sioned along with four compressor stations (out of 13 scheduled).
Gryazovets – Vyborg
Gas trunk pipeline Gryazovets – Vyborg will provide for gas supplies to the North-West of Russia and to the exportpipeline ”Nord Stream”. Its length – 917 km. In 2006, 148 km of linear part of pipeline were commissioned.
«Nord Stream»
Trunk export gas pipeline via Baltic Sea will connect Russian coast near Vyborg and German coast near Greifswald. Itslength – 1,200 km, tubes diameter - 1,220 mm, working pressure – up to 220 bar. The first line of the pipeline with athroughput capacity of 27.5 bcm per year is planned to be commissioned in 2010. Gas pipeline will have no interme-diate compressor station.
Sokhranovka-Oktyabrskaya Pipeline
Gas trunk pipeline Sokhranovka-Oktyabrskaya is intended for meeting the gas needs of consumers in southern regionsof Russian Federation. Putting this pipeline into operation will permit to exclude the transit of Russian gas throughUkrainian territory while transporting it to the consumers in Rostov region, Krasnodarsky krai, and Stavropolsky krai.The length of pipeline – 310 km, annual capacity – 28 bcm. Kamensk-Shahtinskaya compressor station (80 MW) willbe built. As of the end of 2006, the whole linear part of the gas pipeline was commissioned.
Kasimovskoye UGSF – Voskresenk Pipeline
Gas trunk pipeline Kasimovskoye UGSF – Voskresenk is intended for transportation of gas from Kasimovskoye UGSFto Loop gas pipeline in Moscow region. Trunk pipeline will increase the amount and reliability of gas supply to Moscowand Moscow region during the peak consumption period. Its length – 204 km, annual capacity – 4.8 bcm. Enlargementof Tuma compressor station by 24 MW and Voskresensk compressor station by 36 MW is envisaged. As of the end of2006, 51 km of the linear part of the gas pipeline were commissioned.
Urengoi Gas Transportation Nodal Point
The expansion of the Urengoi gas transportation nodal point will compensate for the increased volumes of gas pro-duced by Gazprom and by independent suppliers in Nadym-Pur-Taz region. The project envisages construction of 406km of pipeline and 3 compressor stations with total capacity of 272 MW. As of the end of 2006, 123 km of the linearpart of the gas pipeline were commissioned along with 2 compressor stations.
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
40
Underground Storage
The system of underground gas storage facilities (UGSF) settles the seasonal unevenness of gas consumption, pro-vides for additional gas supplies in case of sharp fall of temperature, breakdowns and other emergencies, ensuresreliability of export and long-term gas reservation.
Characteristics of Gazprom’s UGSF Located in Russia
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Underground gas storage facilities 23 24 24 24 25Total active capacity, bcm 59.88 61.44 62.38 64.25 64.65Compressor station 16 17 17 17 17Gas pumping units 237 239 235 239 218Gas pumping units installed capacity, MW 942.1 971.5 1,002.9 1,021.5 694
Volume of Gas Pumped Into and Retrieved From Russian UGSF, bcm
To smooth the peaks of seasonal uneven consumption the “Program of underground gas storage development inRussian Federation in 2005-2010” is being carried out, aimed at achieving the maximum daily retrieval of 758 millioncubic metres of gas in the 2010/2011 heating season.
60
50
40
30
20
10
02002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Gas pumped Gas retrieved
42.238.4
49.4
40.4 42.637.9
46.3
42.8
48.250.4
41
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
Maximum Daily Retrieval From UGSF Located in Russia in the Beginning of Retrieval Season, mcm
Volume of Gas Pumped Into Foreign UGSF, bcm
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
2002/2003 2003/2004 2004/2005 2005/2006 2006/2007 2010/2011
504 509550 568 600
758
1.6
1,4
1,2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
2005 2006
Latvia Germany Austria United Kingdom
1.5
0.4
1.6
0.3
0.4
0.1
1.1
0.4
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
42
TECHNOLOGICAL COMMUNICATIONS
Unified technological communications network is an integral component of the multilevel control system of OAO “Gazprom”. It provides reliable, high-quality and up-to-date information transfer to the benefit of the company.
OAO “Gazprom” unified technological communications network consists of:87.6 thousand km of main cable lines;23.9 thousand km of multi-channel radio-relay lines;777 communication centers;439 base radio stations and 25.6 thousand service trunking radio stations;communication satellites: «Yamal-100» and two «Yamal-200»;140 earth stations;785 automatic telephone stations with a total capacity of 314.4 thousand numbers;unified corporate data transfer network;Internet – centre.
OAO «Gazprom» Corporate Satellite Communications Network
SabettaKharasavey
Bovanenkovo Antipayuta
NakhodkaMys Kamenny
Yamburg
N. PortTazovsky
KorotchaevoNyda KrasnoselkupLabytnanguiSalekhard Pangody
NadymN. Urengoi
Tarko-SalePravokhettinskyLongyugan
Sorumskaya MuravlenkoTolka
NoyabrskPriozernySosnovskaya
KazymPeregrebnoye
PungaPriobie
Pelym YugorskIvdel
KrasnoturinskSosva
N. Tura Tyumen
Yekaterinburg
Burlaki
Borisovka
Kurgan Omsk
Novosibirsk
Tomsk
Kemerovo
Barnaul
Naryan-Mar
Ukhta
KirovPerm
Chaikovsky
Ufa
Orenburg
Samara
Kazan
Yoshkar-OlaN. Novgorod
Cheboksary
Penza
Saratov
Volgograd
Voronezh
Tambov
Tula
Ryazan
Korolev
Tver
Moscow
Kaluga
OrelKursk
Belgorod
Bryansk
Smolensk
Pskov
Kaliningrad
Sofia KrasnodarAnapa
KabardinkaGelenzhik
Stavropol Astrakhan
Tarumovka
Makhachkala
Maikop
Samsun
Cherkessk
Vladikavkaz
Saint-Petersburg
Gas pipelines Earth stations
43
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
REFINING AND PRODUCTS
Volume of Gazprom’s Natural Gas Processing*, bcm
Volume of Gazprom’s Unstable Condensate and Crude Oil Processing*, bcm
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
02002 2003 2004 2005 2006
* Excluding Sibur Holding. Gazprom Neft’s data are included starting from the 4th quarter of 2005.
10 10.2 11.3
16.1
36.4
35
34
33
32
31
30
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006* Excluding Sibur Holding.
34.133.8
32.4
33.9
33.5
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
44
Refined and Petrochemical Products Manufactured by Gazprom Group*
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Gas transportation and gas production companiesSales stable condensate and oil, thousand tons 2,890.8 2,928.4 3,256.2 3,728.7 3,792.8Stripped dry gas, bcm 26.8 26.0 25.0 26.5 26.0Liquefied hydrocarbon gases, thousand tons 1,935.6 2,081.6 1,854.0 1,881.9 1,837.7Motor gasoline, thousand tons 1,400.1 1,842.0 2,005.1 2,242.7 2,158.8Diesel fuel, thousand tons 1,569.3 1,542.7 1,732.1 1,640.8 1,442.9Fuel oil, thousand tons 374.1 390.6 392.8 380.8 380.5TS-1 fuel, thousand tons - - 15.0 50.9 150.2Helium, thousand cubic metres 6,291.3 6,473.7 3,452.3 1,636.4 3,838.1Odorant, tons 2,750.8 3,010.0 2,661.0 3,109.0 2,952.0Wide fraction of light hydrocarbons and fractions of multiple componenthydrocarbons, thousand tons 240.1 232.1 398.4 541.6 881.4Ethane, thousand tons 290.2 283.6 202.6 108.1 223.2Technical carbon, thousand tons 28.5 32.1 35.1 33.6 34.5Methanol, thousand tons 333.2 753.0 723.4 614.0 657.1Pentane-hexane fraction, mcm 106.8 110.0 99.7 75.1 92.6Sulfur, thousand tons 4,976.0 5,112.3 5,184.0 5,361.8 5,296.3Gazprom Neft Group**Motor gasoline, thousand tons - - - 883 5,060Naphta, thousand tons - - - 236 1,755Diesel fuel, thousand tons - - - 1,314 7,614Jet fuel, thousand tons - - - 277 1,640Fuel oil, thousand tons - - - 697 4,506Lubricants, thousand tons - - - 53 327Liquefied hydrocarbon gases, thousand tons - - - 98 508Sibur HoldingStripped dry gas, mcm 3,302 9,348 10,261 10,951 12,076Wide fraction of light hydrocarbons, thousand tons 698 1,674 2,019 2,465 3,015Stable natural gas gasoline, thousand tons 227 423 490 559 613Liquefied hydrocarbon gases, thousand tons 1,667 2,481 2,817 2,891 2,942Monomers, liquid and monomer fractions, thousand tons 1,106 1,788 1,747 1,903 2,149Polymers and processed polymer products, thousand tons 222 351 431 583 568Synthetic rubber, thousand tons 314 519 573 584 624Products of organic synthesis, thousand tons 332 660 762 986 1,038Fuel and lubricants, thousand tons 408 405 535 656 667Mineral fertilizers and raw materials for them, thousand tons 427 1,328 1,267 1,382 1,362Tyres, million pcs 3.4 17.6 15.2 13.7 11.6* The data in the table are exclusive of give and take raw materials.
** Gazprom Neft’s data are included starting from the 4th quarter of 2005.
45
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
Maz
yr O
R
Sibu
r-PE
TF
Mos
cow
OR
Plas
tik
Yaro
slav
nefte
orgs
inte
z
Yaro
slav
l Tyr
e Pl
ant
Yaro
slav
l OR
Voro
nezh
sint
ezka
uchu
k
Sibu
r-Ne
ftekh
im
Sara
nsk
Indu
stria
lRu
bber
Pla
nt
Toly
attik
auch
ukSi
bur-
Khim
prom
Novo
kuib
yshe
vPe
troch
emic
als
Com
pany
Ural
shin
aKa
uchu
k
Volty
re-P
rom
Sibu
r-Vo
lzhs
kiy
Astra
khan
GPP
Heliu
m p
lant
Oren
burg
GPP
Omsk
shin
aOm
sk O
R
Tom
skne
ftekh
im
Kras
noya
rsk
Synt
hetic
Rub
bers
Pla
nt
Azot
Orto
n
Nizh
neva
rtovs
ky G
PC
Belo
sern
y GP
C
Sibu
r-Ge
otek
stil
Cond
ensa
te
prep
arat
ion
plan
t
Gubk
insk
y GP
C
Mur
avle
nsky
GPP
Cond
ensa
te
stab
iliza
tion
plan
t
Tobo
lsk-
Nefte
khim
Kras
nole
nins
kiy
GPC
Yuzh
no-B
alyk
sky
GPC
Ural
orgs
inte
z
Sosn
ogor
sky
GPP
Maz
yrTv
er
Mos
cow
Tula
Yaro
slav
l
Nizh
niy
Novg
orod
Voro
nezh
Sara
nsk
Kaza
n
Kiro
v
Sam
ara
Tcha
ikov
skiy
Perm
Yeka
terin
burg
Oren
burg
Astra
khan
Volz
hski
y
Tyum
en
Nyag
an
Tobo
lsk
Surg
ut
Noya
brsk
Nizh
neva
rtovs
kUren
goi
Omsk
Tom
sk
Kem
erov
oKr
asno
yars
k
Sosn
ogor
sk
Proc
essi
ngPr
oduc
tion
Oil
refi
ner
y (O
R)
Gas
pro
cess
ing
pla
nt
/ co
mp
lex
(GP
P/G
PC
)
Syn
thet
ic r
ubber
an
d m
on
om
ers
Pla
stic
s an
d o
rgan
ic s
ynth
esis
pro
duc
ts
Tyre
s
Min
eral
fer
tiliz
ers
Tech
nic
al f
abri
cs a
nd
fib
res
Rub
ber
-mec
han
ical
pro
duc
ts
Loca
tion
of G
as P
roce
ssin
g, O
il Re
finin
g an
d Pe
troch
emic
als
Plan
ts o
f Gaz
prom
Gro
up
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
46
Gas Processing, Oil Refining, and Petrochemicals Plants of Gazprom Group
Name Company Location Year Product rangeof establishment
Gazprom Group gas transportation and gas production companies Astrakhan gas ООО «Astrakhangazprom» Astrakhan 1986 Dry natural gas, stable condensate, liquefied gas, processing plant (GPP) wide fraction of light hydrocarbons (WFLH),
gasoline, diesel fuel, fuel oil, sulfur Orenburg GPP ООО «Orenburggazprom» Orenburg 1974 Dry natural gas, stable condensate, liquefied gas,
WFLH, gas sulfur, odorantHelium plant ООО «Orenburggazprom» Orenburg Helium gaseous and liquefied, dry natural gas,
liquefied gas, ethane, WFLH, pentane-hexane fraction (PHF)
Sosnogorsky GPP ООО «Severgazprom» Sosnogorsk, 1946 Dry natural gas, stable condensate, liquefied gas, Komi Republic motor gasoline, technical carbon
Condensate ООО «Urengoigazprom» Urengoi 1985 De-ethanized gas condensate, stable gas Preparation Plant condensate, liquefied gas, motor gasoline,
diesel fuel, gas condensate light distillateCondensate Stable condensate, motor gasoline, Stabilization Plant ООО «Surgutgazprom» Surgut 1985 diesel fuel, TS-1 jet engine fuel, liquefied gas,
WFLH, PHF, gas condensate light distillate Gazprom Neft Omsk ОАО «Gazprom Neft» Omsk 1955 Motor gasoline, naphta, diesel oil, Oil Refinery aviation kerosine, fuel oil, oils,
aromatic hydrocarbons, liquefied hydrocarbongases, bitumens, sulfur
Moscow ОАО «Gazprom Neft» Moscow 1938 Motor gasoline, naphta, diesel oil, aviation kerosine,Oil Refinery fuel oil, bitumens, liquefied hydrocarbon gases,
sulfurYaroslav- ОАО «NGK «Slavneft» Yaroslavl 1961 Motor gasoline, naphta, diesel oil, aviation kerosine,nefteorgsintez fuel oil, oils, aromatic hydrocarbons, sulfur,
sulfuric acid, paraffin-wax products Yaroslavl ОАО «NGK «Slavneft» Yaroslavl region 1879 Naphta, diesel oil, fuel oil, oilsOil Refinery of D.I.Mendeleev Mazyr Oil Refinery ОАО «NGK «Slavneft» Mazyr, Belarus 1975 Motor gasoline, naphta, diesel oil, kerosine,
fuel oil, liquefied hydrocarbon gases, bitumensSibur HoldingNizhnevartovsky ООО «Nizhnevartovsky GPC» Nizhnevartovsk 1978 Associated petroleum gas processing.gas processing WFLH, liquefied gases, dry stripped gas, complex (GPC) stable gas naphtha, propane
47
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
Beloserny GPC ООО «Beloserny GPC» Nizhnevartovsk 1980 - ”-ОАО «Sibur Holding» ООО «Yugragaz- Nizhnevartovsk 2006 - ”-and ТNК-ВР joint venture pererabotka»(Agreement on this joint venture
was signed November 16, 2006.
It will be based
on production facilities
of Beloserny
and Nizhnevartovsky GPC
Gubkinsky GPC ОАО «Gubkinsky GPC» Gubkinsky 1988 - ”-Krasnoleninskiy GPC ООО «Nyagangaz-
pererabotka» Nyagan’ 1987 - ”-Yuzhno-Balyksky GPC ООО «Yuzhno-Balyksky GPC» Pyt’-Yakh 1978 - ”-Muravlenkovsky GPP Noyabrskgazpererabotka
(affiliated branch of OAO SiburTyumenGaz) Noyabrsk 1987 - ”-
Synthetic rubber plant ОАО «Voronezh- Voronezh 1932 Synthetic rubbers, latexes sintezkauchuk» (app.20% of rubbers in Russian market,
more than 40 types of products)
Synthetic rubber plant ОАО «Krasnoyarsk Krasnoyarsk 1952 Butadiene nitrile synthetic rubbersSynthetic Rubbers Plant»
Synthetic rubber plant ОАО «Kauchuk» Volzhskiy, 1958 Methyl-tret-butyl ether (MTBE), Volgograd region aromatic hydrocarbons fraction,
isobutylene, polymer films and productsSynthetic rubber, ООО «Tolyattikauchuk» Samara 1961 Synthetic rubbers, MTBE, isoprene, high-octane monomers dopant DVM, butane-butylene and and combustive- isopentane-isoamylene fractions, latexlubricating materials plant Synthetic rubber, ОАО «Uralorgsintez» Tchaikovsky 1964 Liquefied gases, WFLH, MTBE, benzol, polyolefins isobutylene, methanol, polybutene oilsand combustive-lubricating materials plant Polyolefins, monomers, ООО «Tobolsk-Neftekhim» Tobolsk 1985 Liquefied gases, monomersand combustive-lubricating for the manufacture of synthetic rubbers, MTBEmaterials plant Monomers, ZАО «Novokuibyshev Novokui- 1964 High-purity propane, isobutane, normal butane, aromatic hydrocarbons Petrochemicals byshevsk, isopentane, normal pentane, hexane fraction, and catalysts plant Company» Samara region paratertiary butylphenol, catalysts, diphenyl oxide.
The largest European monomer producer.Mineral fertilizers plant ОАО «Azot» Kemerovo 1956 More than 40 types of products,
including caprolactam, mineral fertilizers, nitric acid, sulphuric acid, ion-exchane resins
Tyre plant ОАО «Yaroslavl Yaroslavl 1932 Heavy truck all steel cord tyres, passenger car tyres, Tyre Plant» light truck tyres, aviation tyres
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
48
Tyre plant ОАО «Omskshina» Omsk 1942 Heavy truck tyres
Tyre plant ОАО «Voltyre-Prom» Volzhskiy, Volgograd region 1964 A wide assortment of tyres
Tyre plant ООО «Uralshina» Yekaterinburg 1943 Passenger car tyres, light truck tyres, motorcycle tyres, industrial tyres
Plastics and organic ОАО «Sibur-Neftekhim» Nizhniy Novgorod 1939 Ethylene, propylene, benzol, butylene-butadiene synthesis products plant fraction, ethylene oxide, ethylene glycols,
gaseous nitrogen, oxygen, polyethylene glycols, caustic, sodium hypochlorite, chlorine, hydrochloric acid, ethylene chlorohydrin, coagulants, polyvinylchloride, linoleum, technical liquids, elastrons, pvc films
Polymer products plant ОАО «Sibur-PETF» Tver 2003 PET bottle granulatePlastics and organic ZАО «Sibur-Khimprom» Perm 1973 WFLH, benzol, propylene, methanol, isobutane, synthesis products plant normal butane, industrial butane, MTBE,
ethylbenzol, butyl alcohols, stable gasolinePlastics ООО «Tomskneftekhim» Tomsk 1974 Polypropylene, high-pressure polyethylene, and organic synthesis formalin and carbamidoformaldehyde resins, products plant ethylene and propylene, consumer goods Plastics ОАО «Plastik» Uzlovaya, Tula region 1959 ABC-plastic, styrenes, polystyrenes, phenoplast,and organic polyethylene film, plastic articles synthesis products plantChemical plant ООО «Sibur-Geotextile» Surgut 2000 A wide assortment of needle-punctured
and thermobound materials Agrotex, Geotex and Paroizol
Chemical plant ОАО «Sibur-Volzhskiy» Volzhskiy, 1958 Cord fabric, polyamide textile (textured, complex)Volgograd region threads, polyamide threads for technical goods,
polyamide fiber and polyamideChemical plant ОАО «Orton» Kemerovo 1971 Various technical fabricsChemical plant ОАО «Saransk Saransk 1963 Molded and non-molded rubber-mechanical
Industrial Rubber Plant» products, V-belts, hoses, engineering sheets, rubberized fabrics, individual protection means, products for medicine and medical industry.
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
MARKETING AND SALES
Russian Natural Gas Market
Gazprom’s Gas Sales to Russian Consumers, bcm
Structure of Gas Sales in Russia by Groups of Consumers in 2006
Gas produced by Gazprom Group is sold to Russian consumers mostly at prices regulated by the Government. Only inSeptember 2006 the Russian Federation Government entitled Gazprom to sell limited volumes of gas at prices based onmarket principles.
320
315
310
305
300
295
290
285
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
298
309.1
305.7
307
316.3
Power generation – 37 %
Household consumers – 15 %
Utility sector – 10 %
Agrochemistry – 6 %
Metallurgy – 6 %
Cement industry – 2 %
Others – 24 %
49
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
The wholesale gas price change parameters are defined by the Government of the Russian Federation. Specific regulat-ed wholesale prices, differentiated by consumer type and by price bands taking into account the distance from the gasproduction region to the consumer, are approved by the Federal Tariff Service of the Russian Federation. Retail gasprices for household consumers are fixed by local administration of subjects of the Russian Federation.
Until 01.01.2005 wholesale gas prices were differentiated by seven price bands. As a result of further improvementof territorial price differentiation, aimed at price covering production and transportation costs, the number of pricebands was increased.
The total wholesale price paid by consumers includes the following regulated components: wholesale gas price, atransportation tariff and a marketing and sales services fee. Gazprom is paid the wholesale price. The regulated trans-portation tariff is paid to the gas distribution companies which transport gas through their low- and middle-pressurenetworks to the consumers, and the marketing and sales services fees are paid to the regional gas sales companies.Wholesale gas price for household consumers is 24% below the price level for other consumers.
In some cases, the retail prices for household consumers may also cover a utilities or municipal gas network mainte-nance fee. Gas pricing for household consumers have some unique features: existence of privilege categories of con-sumers, in the absence of metering devices on individual apartments gas fees are generally calculated in accordancewith established norms.
Average Wholesale Gas Prices for Consumers in the Russian Federation (Except Gas Sold to Household Consumers), roubles/1000 m3 (TVA excluded)
from from from from from from fromPrice band 15.02.2002 01.07.2002 01.01.2003 01.01.2004 01.01.2005 01.01.2006 01.01.2007
0 317 365 438 526
I 383 440 528 634 619 677 779
II 446 513 616 739 745 815 937
III 500 575 690 828 879 960 1,104
IV 526 605 726 871 985 1,080 1,242
IVа 923 1,041 1,198
V 550 633 760 912 1,005 1,104 1,270
VI 566 651 781 937 1,033 1,136 1,306
VII 1,040 1,148 1,320
VIII 1,088 1,202 1,382
IX 1,119 1,241 1,427
X 1,154 1,284 1,477
Xа 1,304* 1,673
XI 1,160 1,295 1,489
Gas transferred
by Barnaul – Biysk – Gorno-
Altaisk gas pipeline
(section 87th km –
Gorno-Altaisk) 1,673
Gas transferred
by Nyuksenitsa – Arkhangelsk
gas pipeline
(section 147th km – Mirny) 2,360
* From 01.08.2006 price was fixed at 1455 roubles/1000 m3.
50
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
Average Wholesale Gas Prices for Household Consumers in the Russian Federation, roubles/1000 m3 (TVA excluded)
from from from from from from from from
Price band 15.02.2002 01.08.2002 01.02.2003 01.01.2004 01.01.2005 01.04.2005 01.01.2006 01.01.2007
0 271 314 387 464
I 286 332 410 492 579 619 677 779
II 312 362 447 536 616 660 726 835
III 335 389 480 576 671 720 794 913
IV 342 397 490 588 720 773 857 986
IVа 678 730 833 958
V 349 405 500 600 725 778 863 992
VI 355 412 508 610 730 783 870 1001
VII 736 792 883 1015
VIII 744 802 896 1030
IX 752 810 907 1043
X 764 822 920 1058
Xа 920** 1196
XI 728.5* 789.1* 920 1058
Gas transferred
by Barnaul – Biysk –
Gorno-Altaisk
gas pipeline (section 87th km –
Gorno-Altaisk) 1,427
Gas transferred
by Nyuksenitsa – Arkhangelsk
gas pipeline (section 147th km – Mirny) 1,836
* Taking into account prices for settlements, harmed by flood of 2002.
** From 01.08.2006 price was fixed at 1040 roubles/1000 m3.
51
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
52
External Market
Gazprom’s Gas Sales Abroad
Gazporom’s Gas Sales in External Markets
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Volume, Share Volume, Share Volume, Share Volume, Share Volume, Share
bcm of total, % bcm of total, % bcm of total, % bcm of total, % bcm of total, %
CIS
and Baltic States 42.6 24.9 44.1 23.9 65.7 30.0 76.6 32.9 101.0 38.5
Europe 128.6 75.1 140.6 76.1 153.2 70.0 156.1 67.1 161.5 61.5
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
171.2+2.8 %
184.7+7.9 %
218.9+18.5 %
232.7+6.3 %
262.5+12.8 %
53
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
53
Volume and Structure of Gazprom’s Gas Sales in European Countries in 2006, bcm and %
Volume and Structure of Gazprom’s Gas Sales in CIS and Baltic States in 2006, bcm and %
Germany – 21.3 %
Italy – 13.7 %
Turkey – 12.3 %
France – 6.2 %
Hungary – 5.4 %
United Kingdom – 5.4 %
Poland – 4.8 %
Czech Republic – 4.6 %
Slovakia – 4.3 %
Others – 22.0 %
34.4
22.1
19.9
10.08.8
8.7
7.7
7.4
7.0
35.5
Ukraine – 58.4 %
Belarus – 20.3 %
Kazakhstan – 6.4 %
Azerbaijan – 4.0 %
Lithuania – 2.8 %
Others – 8.1 %
59.0
20.5
6.5
4.0
2.8
8.2
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
OAO «Gazprom» and OOO «Gazprom Export» Major Joint Ventures to Transport and Market Natural Gas in European Markets as of December 31, 2006
Country Entity Interest, % Joint Venture BriefPartners Description of Activity
Austria Gas und 50 OMV Gas marketing, gas tradingWarenhandels- and general trading activity
gesellschaft m.b.H.Bulgaria Overgas Inc. AD 50 Overgas Holding AD Gas marketing (wholesale
and retail), construction and operationof gas transportation network
Estonia Eesti Gaas AS 6.38 E.ON Ruhrgas AG, Fortum Marketing of natural gas, Corporation, Itera-Latvia, development
ООО “Lentransgas”, of Estonia's gas other shareholders transportation networks
Finland Gasum Oy 25 Fortum Corporation, Gas transportation and marketingE.ON Ruhrgas AG,
the Republic of FinlandFrance FRAGAZ 50 Gaz de France Gas distribution
and trading activitiesGermany WIEH GmbH&Co KG 50 Wintershall Gas marketing,
gas supplyWINGAS GmbH 35 Wintershall Gas transportation
and supplyGreece Prometheus Gas S.A. 50 Copelouzos Bros. Corp. Gas marketing
and constructionof gas transportation network
Hungary Panrusgaz Rt. 40 E.ON Foeldgas Trading Rt. Gas marketing and distributionItaly Promgas SpA 50 ENI Gas marketing and distributionLatvia Latvijas Gaze AS 34 Itera-Latvia, E.ON Ruhrgas AG, Marketing of natural gas
other shareholders and liquefied gas, development and modernization of Latvia's natural gas and services industries
Lithuania Lietuvos Dujos AB 37.06 E.ON Ruhrgas AG, Marketing of natural gas,The Republic of Lithuania, development of Lithuania's
other shareholders gas transportation networksNetherlands Blue Stream 50 ENI Gas transportation
Pipeline Company B.V.Poland SGT EuRoPol GAZ S.A. 48 PGNiG S.A., Gas Trading S.A. Transportation, construction
and operation of the Polish section of the Yamal-Europepipeline
Gas Trading S.A. 16 PGNiG S.A., Bartimpex S.A., Gas marketing, liquefied WIEH, Wenglokoks gas trading
Serbia Progresgas- 25 Progres DSO, NIC Gas supply, gas marketing Trading d.o.o.
54
55
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
Switzerland Gas Project Development 50 Centrex Gas Production and Center Asia AG (Zug) & Energy Europe AG development
of oil and gas fields in Central Asia
WIEЕ 50 Wintershall Gas marketing, gas supplyNord Stream AG 51 E.ON Ruhrgas AG,
Wintershall Gas transportationTurkey Turusgaz 45 Botas International Ltd., Gas marketing
Gama Industrial Plants Manufacturing
and Erection Corp.
OAO “Gazprom” and its subsidiaries also have ownership interests in companies located in the United Kingdom,Slovakia, Moldova, and other European countries and CIS.
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
56
CORPORATE IMMOVABLE PROPERTY
Corporate immovable property of the Gazprom Group exceeds 80 thousand items, located on one million plots. Morethan 54 thousand items are owned by the head company – OAO «Gazprom» and are located on more than 700 thou-sand plots.
OAO «Gazprom» immovable property structure is non-uniform. Large portion of it constitute oil and gas wells – 20 %,trunk pipelines – 11 % and other specific objects of gas business. Buildings and structures amount not more than 15 % .
During 2006, OAO «Gazprom» title was registered to 9.9 thousand items (nearly 20 % of the total), on the whole35,000 of immovable property items (64.8 %) passed state registration.
In pursuance of Federal law on State Land Cadastre implementation OAO «Gazprom» and its subsidiaries continue re-registration of titles to land plots on the territory of 66 subjects of the Russian Federation. Land use planning is practi-cally completed, land plots are registered in State Land Cadastre in the majority of subjects of the Russian Federation,conclusion of land lease contracts is under way.
Large quantity of information entering OAO «Gazprom» in the course of these operations is accumulated in the specialprogram complex «The Unified Register of Title to Immovable Property». In 2006, the integration of OAO «Gazprom»subsidiaries into The Unified Register of Title to Immovable Property in OAO «Gazprom» System» was proceeded andinstallation of application suit for recording e-copies of immovable property title documents in subsidiaries has begun.
State Registration of OAO «Gazprom» Title to Immovable Property (Progressive Total)
40 000
35 000
30 000
25 000
20 000
15 000
10 000
5 000
0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
35 000 64.8 %
25 122 46.5 %
11 279 20.9 %
5 75510.7 % 2 912
5.4 %
Num
ber o
f ite
ms
Share of registered items
INNOVATION ACTIVITY
Research and Development (R&D) in gas business contracted by ОАО “Gazprom” are carried out both by Gazprom’sresearch organizations and external agencies.
R&D Contracted by OAO «Gazprom», billion Roubles
Gazprom owns 1251 patents.
In order to comply with the Federal law “On Technique Regulation” Gazprom proceeds to develop its corporate stan-dardization and certification systems. 131 OAO “Gazprom” standards were elaborated in 2006.
57
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
02002 2003 2004 2005 2006
OAO «Gazprom» subsidaries External agencies
1.9
0.3
1.6 1.7 1.82 1.21 1.22
0.4
0.94
0.2 0.26
2.1
2.76
1.41 1.48
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
ENERGY SAVING
In 2006, the implementation of the power saving program for the period from 2004 through 2006 oriented to increaseenergy and fuel efficiency was completed. Total saving of the fuel and energy resources amounted to 12.5 million tonsof coal equivalent.
Fuel and Energy Resources Saved by Gazprom in 2004–2006, thousand of tce
58
5 000
4 500
4 000
3 500
3 000
2 500
2 000
1 500
1 000
500
02004 2005 2006
Natural gas Electric power Thermal power
39.3171.4
4,012.1 3,833.3 4 108
148 95.246.8 33.1
4,222.8 4,028.1 4,236.3
PERSONNEL
Changes in Personnel Structure of Major Gazprom’s Production and Transportation Subsidaries
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total, thousand people 248.3 251.8 251.8 247.1 232.2Including, %:Managers 8.9 9.0 9.1 9.1 9.1Specialized white-collars 18.9 19.0 19.5 20.1 21.2Production workers 68.4 67.6 66.9 66.3 65.0Other employees 3.8 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.7* Major Gazprom’s Production and Transportation Subsidiaries include – Astrakhangazprom, Bashtransgaz, Volgogradtransgaz, Volgotransgaz,
Kavkaztransgaz, Kaspiygazprom, Kubangazprom, Lentransgaz, Mostransgaz, Nadymgazprom, Noyabrskgazdobycha, Orenburggazprom,
Permtransgaz, Samaratransgaz, Severgazprom, Surgutgazprom, Tattransgaz, Tomsktransgaz, Tyumentransgaz, Uraltransgaz, Urengoigazprom,
Yugtransgaz, Yamburggazdobycha.
Personnel Structure of Major Gazprom’s Production and Transportation subsidaries, 2006
59
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
Managers – 9.1 %
Specialized – 21.2 %
Production workers– 65 %
Other employees – 4.7 %
GAZPROM IN FIGURES 2002–2006
60
Kalin
ingr
ad
St.-P
eter
sbur
g
Mos
cow
Nizh
niy
Novg
orod
Tam
bov
Ukht
a
Igrim
Nady
mNo
vy U
reng
oi
Surg
ut
Tom
skOm
sk
Yeka
terin
burg
Perm
Ufa
Oren
burg
Sam
ara
Sara
tov
Kaza
n
Volg
ogra
d
Astra
khan
Mak
hach
kala
Inst
itutio
ns o
f O
AO
«G
azpr
om»
man
ager
s’
prof
essi
onal
dev
elop
men
t
OA
O «
Gaz
prom
» ed
ucat
iona
l div
isio
ns
of la
bor
forc
e tr
aini
ng
Stav
ropo
l
Kras
noda
r
Inst
itutio
ns o
f OAO
«Ga
zpro
m»
Man
ager
s Pr
ofes
sion
al D
evel
opm
ent
and
OAO
«Gaz
prom
» Ed
ucat
iona
l Div
isio
ns o
f Lab
or F
orce
Tra
inin
g
Inst
itutio
ns o
f OAO
«Ga
zpro
m»
man
-
ager
s’ p
rofe
ssio
nal d
evel
opm
ent
Mos
cow
Non
-sta
te e
duca
tiona
l ins
titut
ion
«OAO
“Ga
zpro
m”
Corp
orat
e In
stitu
te»
Rese
arch
and
edu
catio
n ce
nter
of
adva
nced
trai
ning
at G
ubki
n RS
U
of o
il an
d ga
s
The
Acad
emy
of N
atio
nal E
cono
my
unde
r the
Gov
ernm
ent o
f the
Rus
sian
Fede
ratio
n
Russ
ian
Acad
emy
of S
tate
Ser
vice
unde
r the
Pre
side
nt o
f the
Rus
sian
Fede
ratio
n
Adva
nced
Tra
inin
g De
partm
ent a
t Sta
te
Tech
nica
l Uni
vers
ity –
MAD
I
St. P
eter
sbur
g
St. P
eter
sbur
g br
anch
of
«OAO
“Ga
zpro
m”
Corp
orat
e In
stitu
te»
Kalin
ingr
ad
Rese
arch
, edu
catio
n an
d tra
inin
g
cent
er o
f gas
indu
stry
Volg
ogra
d
Volg
ogra
d oi
l and
gas
col
lege
Sam
ara
Serv
ice
cent
er M
IEI a
t Sam
ara
Stat
e
Tech
nica
l Uni
vers
ity
Ore
nbur
g
Staf
f tra
inin
g ce
nter
Ukh
ta
Staf
f edu
catio
n ce
nter
OAO
«Gaz
prom
» ed
ucat
iona
l div
isio
ns
of la
bor f
orce
trai
ning
Trai
ning
cen
ters
of:
OO
O «
Astra
khan
gazp
rom
»
OO
O «
Perm
trans
gaz»
OO
O «
Burg
as»
OO
O «
Tom
sktra
nsga
z»
Pers
onne
l edu
catio
n ce
nter
s of
:
OO
O «
Kasp
iyga
zpro
m»
OO
O «
Ore
nbur
ggaz
prom
»
OO
O «
Tyum
entra
nsga
z»
OO
O «
Kuba
ngaz
prom
»
OO
O «
Seve
rgaz
prom
»
OO
O «
Volg
otra
nsga
z»
Wor
k tra
inin
g ce
nter
s of
:
OO
O «
Kavk
aztra
nsga
z»
OO
O «
Surg
utga
zpro
m»
OO
O «
Mos
trans
gaz»
OO
O «
Ura
ltran
sgaz
»
Educ
atio
n co
urse
s ce
nter
s of
:
OO
O «
Bash
trans
gaz»
OO
O «
Nad
ymga
zpro
m»
OO
O «
Ure
ngoi
gazp
rom
»
OO
O «
Volg
ogra
dtra
nsga
z»
OO
O «
Kavk
aztra
nsga
z»
OO
O «
Tattr
ansg
az»
DAO
«Vo
lgog
az»
OOO
«Yug
trans
gaz»
Pers
onne
l tra
inin
g of
fices
of:
OO
O «
Sam
atra
nsga
z»
OO
O «
Yam
burg
gazd
obyt
cha»
«Om
skga
ztek
hnol
ogia
»
DAO
«Za
psib
gazp
rom
»