North Dakota Geological SurveyGeologic Invest igations No. 135
Edward C. Murphy, State Geo logistLynn D. Helms, Director Dept. of Mineral Resources
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
"
"
" "
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
" " "
"
"
"
"
""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
"
""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
"
"
""
""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
"
" "
"
"
"
"
" " "
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
" "
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
" "
"
"
"
"
"
" "
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
""
"
" "
"
""
"
"
"
""
"
"
" "
"
"
"
"
"
""
"
""
"
""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
" "
"
""
"
""
"
"
"
"
""
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
Jud
Ayr
Za p
Ma x
Ray
Le hr
Kulm
Nom e
Le al
Pag e
Hop e
Lo m a
Ma za
Yo rk
Kno x
My lo
Kief
Win g
Rus o
Ros s
Mo tt
Oa ke s
Daz ey
Oxb o w
Alice
Ane ta
Pek inTol na
Gilb y
Min toPise k
Ada m s
Nec he
Alse nCal io
Wale s
Per th
Can d o
Cra r y
Le ed s
Balt a
Rol la
La nd a
Dra ke
Ve lva
Uph a m
Reg a n
Hag u e
Sole n
Le ith
Elgin
Haz en
But te
Ryd er
Gr an o
Plaz a
Dod g e
Go lva
Bea ch
Tio ga
Alam o
Rha m e
Ash ley
Wish e k
Ga ckle
Ma r ion
Dick ey
Ve r on aBer lin
Fo r be s
Lu dd e n
Hav an a
Fo r ma n
Miln o r
Lisb o n
Fin g al
Or iska
Rog e rs
Sible y
Me d ina
Ken sa l
Tap p enDaw so nSte ele
Tu ttle
Bar ne y
Dwig h t
Col fax
Hor a ce
Am en ia
Arth u r
Hun te r
Bux to n
Hat to n
Fin le y
Sha ro n
Bow do n
Cat ha y
Har ve y
La ko ta
Ma n ve l
Ard oc h
Hoo p le
Con wa y
La nk in
Hen se l
Milt on
Nek om a
Mu n ich
Cal vin
Han n ahSar les
Bisb ee
La wto n
Edm o re
Ob er o n
Esm on d
Kra m er
Ove r ly
Sou ris
Ant ler
Ber ge n
Tow ne r
Ban tr y
Ma r tin
Lin to n
Car so n
Alm on t
Heb r on
Cen te r
Beu la h
Me r ce r
Ma ko ti
Saw ye r
Sur re y
Car p io
Tol ley
Mo h all
Por ta l
Tay lor
Reg e nt
Hay ne s
Ree d er
Am ido n
Epp in g
Noo n an
Cro sb y
Wilto n
Ze e lan d
La m ou reEdg el ey
Mo n an go
Gw inn er
Elliot t
She ld on
Kat hr yn
San bo r n
Ping re e
Walc ot t
Kind re d
Har wo o d
Ga rd n er
Gr an d in
Le on a rd
Buff alo
Lu ve rn e
Binf or d
Ham b e rg
Nia ga ra
Em er ad o
Ink ste r
Gr af to n
Dra yt onCry sta lEge la nd
Bro cke t
Ham p d en
War wic k
Ma d do ck
Wolf or d
Rol ett e
St J oh n
Ma xb a ssNew bu r g
Ga rd e na
Balf ou r
Lin co ln
Fla sh e r
Sta nto n
Dou g las
Ken m ar e
Lo ra in e
Fla xt on
Lig nit e
Buc yru s
Am br os e
Fo r tun a
La ng d on
Dee r ing
Ma n nin g
Ve n tu ria
Fr e do nia
Nap o leo n
Cog sw ell
End er lin
Stre e te r
Buc ha na n
Rob in so n
Mo o re to nWyn dm e r e
Ma n ta do r
Ma p let on
Cliffo r d
Ma yv illePor tla nd
Mc He n ry
She ye nn e
Syke st on
Mc Ville
Mic hig a n
Rey no ld s
Th o mp so n
La rim o re
Edin b ur gFa ir da le
Mo u nt ain
Ham ilt on
Bat hg at e
Cav ali er
Walh a llaHan sb o ro
Roc kla ke
Dun se ith
La ns fo rd
Wes th op e
Ana m oo se
Vo lta ir e
Go od r ich
Haz elt on
Bra dd o ck
Ben ed ict
Was hb u rn
Ga rr iso n
Des L ac s
Ber th old
Gle nb u rn
She rw oo d
Bow be lls
Col um b us
NewTow n
Hal lida yKillde e r
Belf ield
Ga sco yn e
Scr an to n
Ma r ma r th
Arn eg a rd
Wild ro se
Belc ou rt
Ellen d ale
Fu lle rt on
Pillsb ur y
Wim bl ed on
Cle vel an d
Woo d wo rt h
Cou r te na y
Pet tib on e
Han kin so n Fa ir mo u nt
Chr ist ine
Dav en p or t
Cas se lto n
Ga les bu r gHan n af or d
Gle nf ield
Fe ss en d en
Nor th wo o d
Fo r dvi lle
St Th om a s
Osn a br oc k
Brin sm a de
Kar lsr uh e
Gr an ville
Mc Clu sk y
Stra sb u rg
Self rid ge
NewSale m
PickCity
Und e rw oo d
Rive rd a le
Gla ds to ne
Het tin ge r
Alex an de r
Gr ac eCity
Litc hv ille
Mo n tp elie r
Lid ge r wo od
Gr ea tBen d
Arg us ville
Tow erCity
Hur d sfie ld
Pet er sb ur g
Par kRive r
Fo r tYa te s
Gle nUllin
Col eh ar b or
Bur ling to n
Don n yb ro ok
Rich ar d to n
Fo r tRan so m
Abe rc ro m bie
Coo p er st ow n
Min n ew au ka n
Willo w C ity
NewLe ipz ig
Tu rt leLa ke
Pow er sLa ke
Wh iteEar th
Dun nCen te r
Sou thHea r t
NewEng la nd
NewRoc kfo r d
Fo r estRive r
Sta rkw ea th e r
Spr ingBro ok
Chu r ch sFe r ry
Go lde nVa lle y
Sen tin elBut te
Spir itw oo dLa ke
Pale rm o
Gr en o ra
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!( !(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
Red
R ive
r
Misso uri
Knife
Sheyenn e River
James River
Heart
Souris River
Bo is de Sioux
Cannonb all
Little M isso uri River
River
Little
Yellow
ston e
R.
MuddyRiver
River
River
Cedar
Creek
River
Little M
issouri
River
James
River
River
River
Red River
Red River
DevilsLake
Souris River
Souris River
Des La c River
River
LAKE
SAKAKAW EA
OAHELAKE
LAKE
SAKAKAW EA
Pembina
Sheyenn e
Red River
(/85
(/85
(/2
(/2
(/52
(/52
(/83
(/83
(/2
(/52
(/83
§̈¦29
§̈¦94
§̈¦29
§̈¦29
§̈¦94§̈¦94
EXTENT OF COAL BEARING STR ATA IN T HE SU BSU RFACE
E XT ENT OF COALS
EASTE RN EX T E NT O F WIL LISTO N BASIN
µ104o R 10 0 W
103oR 10 2 W
R 96 W R 92 W102o
R 94 W R 88 W R 84 W101o
R 86 W R 80 W R 76 WR 78 W R 72 W100o
R 68 WR 70 W R 64 W99oR 60 WR 62 W R 56 W
98o
R 10 4 W
46o
T 130 N
104o
R 10 0 W 103oR 98 WR 10 2 W
R 96 W R 92 W 102oR 90 WR 94 W R 88 W R 84 W 101o
R 82 WR 86 W R 76 W R 74 WR 78 W 100oR 68 W R 66 WR 70 W
99oR 60 W R 58 WR 62 W R 56 W98o
R 54 W R 52 W49o49o
R 48 WR 54 W R 52 W 97o
48o
T 162 N
T 160 N
T 158 N
T 156 N
T 154 N
47o
T 150 N
T 148 N
T 146 N
T 144 N
T 142 N
T 140 N
T 138 N
T 136 N
T 134 N
46o
T 132 N
T 130 N
48o
T 162 N
T 160 N
T 158 N
T 156 N
T 154 N
47o
T 150 N
T 148 N
T 146 N
T 144 N
T 142 N
T 140 N
T 138 N
T 136 N
T 134 N
T 132 N
Figure 2. The distribution of sha llow gas occurrences detected in groundwaters that arefound within respective areas of interpolated sulfate /bicarbonate ratio across NorthDakota . The f requency of wells with a shallow gas show is greater in areasdelinea ted as having rela tively lower sulfate/bicarbonate ratios.
Geochemical Indicators of Shallow Gas in Groundwater in North DakotaFred J. Anderson
2011
0 10 20 30 40Miles
0 10 20 30 40Kilometers
Lambert Conforma l ConicNorth American Datum 1983
1:1,000,000Scale
Cartographic Compilation: Elroy L. Kadrmas
[Sulfate]/[Bicarbonate]Ratio in Groundwater
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.01.11.2
Geologic Symbols!( Ground-Water Wells with Detected Shallow Gas Occurrence
Historical Area of Reported Shallow Gas in Water-Supply Wells
Area of Gas Occcurrence, as determined from Recent Anecdotal Occurrences in Water-Supply Wells
Eastern Extent of Williston Basin (Laird, 1956)
Extent of Coal Bearing Strata in the Subsurface (Murphy, 2001)
Township Boundaries
County Boundaries
Selected Major Rivers or Creeks
City/Town Boundaries
" City/Town Locations
Water
Interstate Highway§̈¦29
(/83 US Highway
Misc Symbols
Figure 1. Comparison of sulfate/bicarbonate concentra tion ratios in groundwater to shallowgas field screening results from selected wells across Nor th Dakota. The highest methaneconcentration (reported in ppm as C1 in air) de tec ted from wells in each county arecompared against their respective average sulfate/bicarbonate ratios - as determined fromavailable ground-water geochemical data. The number of shallow gas occurrences isgrea ter, and are also in relatively higher concentrations, as the sulfate/bicarbonate ratiodecreases.
selected
REFERENCESAnderson, F.J ., Gudmunsen, C.B., Hall, B.N., Ries , A.J ., Christensen , A.R., and Bubach, B.J., 2010,Locat ions of FID Shallow Gas O ccurrences in North Dakota, North Dakota Geolog ical Survey,Geologic Inves tigations No. 128, 1 :500,000 scale map. Anderson, F.J., 2010, Shallow Gas Geochemical Exploration Indicators in Ground-Water Wells inNorth Dako ta, North Dakota Geolog ical Survey, Geolog ic Invest igations No. 92, 1:500 ,000 scale map.
Anderson, F.J. , 2009, Methane Occu rrence in Glacial Buried-Valley Aquifer Systems in N orthDako ta, Geo logical Society of America 2009 Annual Meeting & E xposi tion , Abs tracts withPrograms, Vol . No . 41, No. 7, p. 214.
Anderson, F.J., Shu rr, G.W., and Fischer, D.W., 2006, History, Geology, and Potent ial Hydro-geochemical Indicators of Natural Gas Occurrence and Production from Quaternary Glacial Driftand Upper-Cretaceous Sedimentary Bedrock in North-Central North Dakota, North DakotaGeological Survey, Geolog ic Investigat ions No. 33, 25 p. Laird , W.M., 1956, The Will iston Basin - A Backward Look with a View to the Future, Firs tInternational Williston Basin Symposium, Bismarck ND, p . 14-22.
Mart ini , A.M., Walter, L.M. , Ku, T.C.W., Budai, J.M., McIntosh , J.C., and Schoell, M., 2003, Microb ialproduction and modification o f gases in sedimentary basins-a geochemical case s tudy from aDevonian shale gas play, Michigan basin: AAPG Bullet in, p. 1355-1375.
McIn tosh , J.C. , and Mart ini , A.M., 2008 , Hydrogeochemical Indicators for Microb ial Methane inFractured Organ ic-Rich Shales: Case Studies of the Antrim, New Albany, and Ohio Shales, in Hill,P. Lil lis, and J. Curtis, eds ., Gas Shale in the Rocky Moun tains and Beyond: Rocky Moun tainAssociation of Geologists 2008 Guidebook CD, p. 162-174 .
Murphy, E.C., 2001, Strippab le Lign ite Deposi ts of North Dako ta, North Dako ta Geological Su rvey,Miscellaneous Maps No. 34.
NDSWC, 2010 , North Dako ta State Water Commission Online G round-Water In fo rmationSys tem: http:/ /www.swc.state.nd.u s
Shurr, G.W., Haggar, T., and Chad ima, S.A., 2006, Exp loration Strategies for U ltra-ShallowMicrobial Methane on the Eastern Marg in of the Willis ton Basin, American Association o fPetroleum Geologists, National Meeting Abs tracts Volume, Houston TX, p 99.
Shurr, G.W., 2008, Shallow Biogenic Gas in Cretaceous Shale on the Eas tern Margin o f theWillis ton Bas in, in Hill, P. Lil lis, and J. Curtis, ed s., Gas Shale in the Rocky Mountains and Beyond:Rocky Mountain Association o f Geologists 2008 Gu idebook CD, p. 176 -198.
VanVoas t, W.A., 2003, Geochemical signature of fo rmation waters associated with coalbed methane:AAPG Bullet in, v. 87, p . 667-676 .
in
in
DISCUSSION The geochemical distribution of ground-water chemistries (in theform of sulfate [SO4] to bicarbonate [HCO] ion ratio) favorable for theoccurrence of methane (CH4 or C1) is presented on this map. In addition,the locations of ground-water wells (field screened between 2006 to2010) have been plotted that contain methane. Data from 7,503 wells wasextracted, averaged, and interpreted here as is from ground-watergeochemical databases maintained by the North Dakota State WaterCommission (NDSWC). The data used for the geochemical interpolationon the map is from many different individual sampling events andinclude data from sampling events as far back as 1932. Any well sampledwith ground-water ion chemistry meeting previously identified shallowgas exploration criteria has been included. Data reported from all types ofwells found across the state, including: domestic, stock, production,municipal, industrial, observation, and irrigation wells, were used in thegeostatistical interpolation. Wells described as “unknowns” with reportedsulfate and bicarbonate ion concentrations were also included forcompleteness. Well depths range across all shallow ground-water systemsfrom as shallow as three feet to as deep as 3,277 feet with the majority ofwells (>80%) completed to depths less than 300 feet. In the absence of methane detection through instrumental or analyticalmeans, sulfate and bicarbonate ion concentrations have beendemonstrated as valid proxy indicators for potential occurrences ofmethane. The ratio of these concentrations are predictive ofground-water chemistry favorable for the presence of methane in theshallow subsurface. Previous workers (Anderson, et. al, 2006, McIntoshand Martini, 2008, Martini, et.al., 2003, Shurr, et.al, 2006, Shurr, 2008,and Van Voast, 2003) have demonstrated empirically that sulfate ionconcentrations less than 500 mg/L, coupled with bicarbonate ionconcentrations greater than 400 mg/L, are indicative of groundwaterscontaining detectable concentrations of methane in shallow ground-watersystems in the Dakotas. The interpolated sulfate to bicarbonate ratiodistribution is plotted on this map for the purposes of shallow gasexploration and comparison with known areas of hydrocarbon resourceoccurrence and reported historical shallow natural gas occurrence. Areas where a good correlation exists between known hydrocarbonoccurrence and areas shown to be favorable for the occurrence ofmethane (based on sulfate to bicarbonate ratios) include: 1) the westerntwo-thirds of the state coincident with the existence of the WillistonBasin, 2) the areas of measureable coal resources, and 3) areashistorically (ca. 1900’s) reported to have had shallow gas in the shallowground-water systems. These historic areas include Bottineau County(north-central North Dakota), and the LaMoure area (southeastern NorthDakota). In addition, recent anecdotal reports of shallow gas in waterwells have been recorded in north-central North Dakota. Areas recentlyidentified by the NDGS to contain shallow gas through well fieldscreening, sampling, and testing include McKenzie County, westernDickey, northeastern Ransom, and eastern Cavalier counties. Severalsmaller areas were also identified in Divide and Burke Counties(northwestern North Dakota) as well as Wells, Eddy, Foster, Kidder,Burleigh, and Emmons counties (central North Dakota). A comparison of shallow gas occurrences with areas of interpolatedground-water geochemistry data further supports the conditions ofground-water geochemistry that are favorable, and potentially predictiveof methane occurrence. Comparing sulfate/bicarbonate ratios (i.e. lowsulfate/higher bicarbonate concentrations in groundwater) from wellswith detected shallow gas indicate that a greater number of wells withrelatively higher methane concentrations, occur at the lower end of thesulfate/bicarbonate ratio spectrum (Figure 1). Further, the directcomparison of ground-water geochemistry across the state with wells thatcontain shallow gas demonstrates occurrences (Figure 2) tend to be foundin areas of favorable ground-water geochemistries (i.e. low sulfate/bicarbonate ratio). It is important to note that this geostatistical interpolation andhydrogeologic interpretation of shallow ground-water geochemistrygroups the saturated shallow subsurface into one relatively homogeneousground-water unit across the state. In actuality this unit consists ofseveral discontinuous systems and aquifers which are most appropriatelyconsidered individually and at larger scales for typical hydrogeologicalstudies.
[SO42-] [HCO3
-]
as is
(CH4 or C1)