Download - Geothermal Studies at New Mexico Tech
Geothermal Studies at New Mexico Tech
New Mexico Geothermal Energy Working Group Meeting
May 13, 2008
Jungho Park
New Mexico Geothermal ProgramSystems Studied:Coso, CASalton Sea, CAThe Geysers, CASteamboat Springs, NVDixie Valley, NVDarajat, and Karaha Telaga Bodas, IndonesiaTiwi, PhillipinesLightningdock,NMValles, NM
Some projects we are working on:
• Fluid Inclusion Stratigraphy
• Icelandic Deep Drilling Project
• Scale mitigation of injection wells
• New Mexico Tech geothermal exploration well
Development of FIS for Geothermal
Exploration
• FIS “fluid inclusion stratigraphy”
• Invented to find hydrocarbon “pay zones”
• Measures fluid inclusion volatiles in well cuttings which we apply to Geothermal wells
FIS Analysis of Geothermal Well Cuttings Compared to Temperature Log
Well 67-17
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650
Temperature (F)
Temperature (F)
0 200 400 600
Dep
th (
ft)
In general what we see from bottom to system top in the
Coso Geothermal System.
Plume waters and mixed plume fluids,production zone
Seal or cap
Meteoric waters heated by steam of conduction,
Discontinuous background or dead zone where no fluids circulate
FIS Fence Diagram of
Part of Coso
LEGEND
SE NW
Icelandic Deep Drilling Project
• Krafla, Iceland
• Attempt to drill over 5km deep and capture geothermal fluids in the supercritical phase (>374C) for increased electrical production
• Characterize fluid compositions and interaction with volcanic source using inclusion gas analyses of core and cuttings
KraflaKrafla
Socorro PeakExploration Drilling
•Initiative: New Mexico Tech Campus direct-use heating system
•Need >60°C geothermal fluid produced at a moderate flow rate @ 300 gallons per minute
•2004 (at time of grant) – offset $600K in natural gas costs
•2007 prices – offset risen to ~$1.2M
•Resource: The Socorro Peak, a region of elevated heatflow with values upwards of 470 mW/m2 within quartzite mountain block
•Warm springs (30°C) to the south
Multiple MethodsMultiple Methods
•Magnetotellurics•Resistivity•Gravity•Remote Sensing•Geochemical Mapping•CO2 Soil Surveys
Socorro Peak Thermal Gradient (Barroll and Reiter, 1990)
SocorroSocorro
500m
•Executed along front range
•Imaged a low resistivity body (blue) within Basin possibly representing saturated geothermal reservoir
•More resistive (red) unit representing uplifted fault block
Resistivity
Magnetotellurics SurveyMagnetotellurics Survey
N
1000 m
121086420
Relative Temp Elevation (C)
Remote Sensing•Satellite-based infrared imagery (ASTER data)
•Max >12ºC above ambient near Woods Tunnel
Town of
Socorro
Socorro Peak
Woods Tunnel = 490 mW/m2
Geochemical Mapping•Soil sampled along E-W transects crossing range-bounding faults
•Selective extraction of soils to isolate loosely-adsorbed volatiles
•Trace elements composition of substrate measured with ICP-MS
•Elemental maps reveal anomalous high intensities along range front coinciding with structural features and highest measured heat flow
NN
Drilling Results• DOSECC began
drilling Nov-Dec 2006
• Bedrock encountered @ 165ft, heavily fractured and mineralized
• Watertable @ ~200ft depth
• Bottom hole temp of 33.5C was measured at a depth (240ft)
Entrance to Woods Tunnel
217’
216’
y = 16.036x - 299.81
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
10 30 50 70
Temp (ºC)D
ep
th (
ft)
65
742’
•Shallow thermal gradient projected to 742ft depth gives necessary 65C for district heat-loop
•Quartz (Fournier) geothermometer from well fluids = 100C reservoir
•K-Mg-Na (Giggenbach) geothermometer = >150C
Well 67-17
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650
Temperature (F)
Gas species: inorganic, organic,sulfur (orange), aromatics
Gas ratios for interpretingfluid source
Well 51B-16
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650
Temperature (F)
Generally Easy to See Fluid Stratigraphy