![Page 1: Global Advocacy Working Group Second report back](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082610/56649f475503460f94c68e58/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Global Advocacy Working Group
Second report back
![Page 2: Global Advocacy Working Group Second report back](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082610/56649f475503460f94c68e58/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Responding to country feedback
The CCM is left out once the proposals are submitted--until Phase 2 submission
Action: raise issue with Secretariat CCM team as a priority for 2008: operationalize CCM’s ‘oversight of implementation’ role
Lack of accurate country data might undermine a good proposal
Action: FHI will assemble and help synthesize country data for 10 countries in initiative
![Page 3: Global Advocacy Working Group Second report back](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082610/56649f475503460f94c68e58/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Responding to country feedback
Need evidence and information on cost effectiveness and value for money of prevention interventions
Action: Rapid internal assessment of usable data from Cochrane Report, released May 2008
Action: Assemble data for countries to use on cost effectiveness of range of RH interventions
![Page 4: Global Advocacy Working Group Second report back](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082610/56649f475503460f94c68e58/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Opportunities for progress and victory in 2008
• Side meetings during Implementers meeting: June 2008 – Action: find out if there will be a linkages session; ask
GF to hold another post-implementers meeting session
• August 2008 Mexico City– Action: meeting with new champions and Secretariat—
discuss progress and problems in implementation
![Page 5: Global Advocacy Working Group Second report back](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082610/56649f475503460f94c68e58/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Opportunities for progress and victory in 2008
• May 2008 Release of Cochrane Report– Will include best practices along with ‘gold
standard’ of evidence– Action: first step will be an internal community
analysis, to make sure the findings do not undermine our efforts
![Page 6: Global Advocacy Working Group Second report back](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082610/56649f475503460f94c68e58/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Further discussion of Gender Strategy Framework…
• What experience do we want to see in a Gender Champion?– Real experience: Implementing programs, ‘minimum of x years in
country implementation,’ RH expertise, people with HIV encouraged to apply,
– What about someone with a global profile? – What can NGOs bring to the discussion? The Private Sector?
– Move away from people we have been hearing from for 20 years
![Page 7: Global Advocacy Working Group Second report back](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082610/56649f475503460f94c68e58/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Further discussion of Gender Strategy Framework…
• What do we want the Champions to do?
– Operational focus– Engaging with countries, assessing what is actually happening at country level – Internal and external advocate– Ongoing training for Global Fund staff especially Fund Portfolio Managers– Measure/track implementation of gender and SRH/HIV organizational goals– Annual reporting and external communication on progress and problems – Focus is not only on women
![Page 8: Global Advocacy Working Group Second report back](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082610/56649f475503460f94c68e58/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Further discussion of Gender Strategy Framework…
• Where should the Champions be located? – Executive Directors office, with a link to
Operations/Country Programs, the CCM Team, and the Performance Evaluation and Policy Team
![Page 9: Global Advocacy Working Group Second report back](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082610/56649f475503460f94c68e58/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Further discussion of Gender Strategy Framework…
• What would success look like? – Improve impact of existing programs and new programs on reducing
vulnerabilities of women, girls and sexual minorities: the team of Champions should have a catalytic effect
– Question: should there be a monetary target? ($XX invested in programs reducing vulnerabilities)
– Question: identify a short list of ‘priority countries’ where the Champions will work for change
– Question: what should the operational targets and Key Performance Indicators against which the Global Fund measures success be?
![Page 10: Global Advocacy Working Group Second report back](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082610/56649f475503460f94c68e58/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
UN Family
• Global Implementation Support Team (GIST) works in parallel with RH supply coalition addressing similar procurement and supply management issues – Action: use opportunities of GIST and CIST ToR
revision, and UNFPA’s chairing of GIST to link PSM strengthening done by RH communities
![Page 11: Global Advocacy Working Group Second report back](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082610/56649f475503460f94c68e58/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Technical Review Panel (TRP)
• Persistently, 40% HIV proposals recommended for approval:– Action: for Round 8 there will be coordination of TS provision
among several WHO departments, not only HIV/AIDS• TRP vacancies filled this year
– Action: Forward names of experts to Secretariat with gender expertise, and SRH/HIV expertise
• Increasing overall TRP capacity – Action: organize TRP integration training day outside of the
proposal review process; set a target proportion for TRP members who go through that training?
![Page 12: Global Advocacy Working Group Second report back](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082610/56649f475503460f94c68e58/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Mobilizing RH/HIV Integration Global Advocacy Working
Group
--Conduct joint advocacy to advance RH/HIV integration targeting the Global Fund and UN Family
--Respond to priority issues identified from country and regional partners