![Page 1: GNSS Antenna Comparison -for Bistatic Applicationcongress.cimne.com/gnss-r10/frontal/presentaciones/123.pdf · 2010-12-07 · GNSS Antenna Comparison-for Bistatic Application Johan](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040718/5e2522cd75570943e90eaf8f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
University of Colorado
GNSS Antenna Comparison-for Bistatic Application
Johan NorbergLuleå University of Technology, Sweden
Dennis AkosUniversity of Colorado, USA
![Page 2: GNSS Antenna Comparison -for Bistatic Applicationcongress.cimne.com/gnss-r10/frontal/presentaciones/123.pdf · 2010-12-07 · GNSS Antenna Comparison-for Bistatic Application Johan](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040718/5e2522cd75570943e90eaf8f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
University of Colorado
Presentation Outline
• L2 antenna introduction/overview
• DLC rooftop, 24h data collection with: – JN L2-horiz. antenna– Novatel Pinwheel antenna– Antcom L1L2L5 antenna
• SNR for two fix heights• SDR Efforts• Proposed future work
![Page 3: GNSS Antenna Comparison -for Bistatic Applicationcongress.cimne.com/gnss-r10/frontal/presentaciones/123.pdf · 2010-12-07 · GNSS Antenna Comparison-for Bistatic Application Johan](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040718/5e2522cd75570943e90eaf8f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
University of Colorado
Theoretical Background
•Basic concept of a reflected signal
• Multiple layer possible (especially with snow/ice)
•Gain pattern for a NovAtel Pinwheel GPS antenna
• Suppresses the LHP
![Page 4: GNSS Antenna Comparison -for Bistatic Applicationcongress.cimne.com/gnss-r10/frontal/presentaciones/123.pdf · 2010-12-07 · GNSS Antenna Comparison-for Bistatic Application Johan](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040718/5e2522cd75570943e90eaf8f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
University of Colorado
Commercial Antennas
Novatel Pinwheel antenna Antcom L1L2L5 antenna
![Page 5: GNSS Antenna Comparison -for Bistatic Applicationcongress.cimne.com/gnss-r10/frontal/presentaciones/123.pdf · 2010-12-07 · GNSS Antenna Comparison-for Bistatic Application Johan](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040718/5e2522cd75570943e90eaf8f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
University of Colorado
L2 Monopole Antenna
• Monopole Antenna above dc-block and preamplifier.
• Angle of the ground sprouts determine the impedance of the antenna
•Simulated gain pattern with idea ground plane
• Polarization not factored into simulation
![Page 6: GNSS Antenna Comparison -for Bistatic Applicationcongress.cimne.com/gnss-r10/frontal/presentaciones/123.pdf · 2010-12-07 · GNSS Antenna Comparison-for Bistatic Application Johan](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040718/5e2522cd75570943e90eaf8f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
University of Colorado
Freq. Response for L2-Simulation
Freq. And SWR Phase and Impedance
•Standing wave ration ~1
• The reflection coefficient as low as -40 dB at L2
•The complex impedance is ~(49.0+0.1j)
• The phase is ~ 0.1 deg
![Page 7: GNSS Antenna Comparison -for Bistatic Applicationcongress.cimne.com/gnss-r10/frontal/presentaciones/123.pdf · 2010-12-07 · GNSS Antenna Comparison-for Bistatic Application Johan](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040718/5e2522cd75570943e90eaf8f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
University of Colorado
L2-Measurement
Frequency sweep Impedance (Smith chart)
• The reflection coefficient as lo as -54 dB for L2
•The Impedance is about 50 Ohm where the imaginary part is just a fraction
![Page 8: GNSS Antenna Comparison -for Bistatic Applicationcongress.cimne.com/gnss-r10/frontal/presentaciones/123.pdf · 2010-12-07 · GNSS Antenna Comparison-for Bistatic Application Johan](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040718/5e2522cd75570943e90eaf8f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
University of Colorado
Presentation Outline
• L2 antenna introduction/overview
• DLC rooftop, 24h data collection with: – JN L2-horiz. Antenna– Novatel Pinwheel antenna– Antcom L1L2L5 antenna
• SNR for two fix heights• SDR Efforts• Proposed future work
![Page 9: GNSS Antenna Comparison -for Bistatic Applicationcongress.cimne.com/gnss-r10/frontal/presentaciones/123.pdf · 2010-12-07 · GNSS Antenna Comparison-for Bistatic Application Johan](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040718/5e2522cd75570943e90eaf8f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
University of Colorado
PRN 07 Sky-plot
N
SE
N
rise
set
•The location of the antenna (Univ of Colorado Engineering Building) and sky trace of satellite of interest (PRN07) are illustrated
![Page 10: GNSS Antenna Comparison -for Bistatic Applicationcongress.cimne.com/gnss-r10/frontal/presentaciones/123.pdf · 2010-12-07 · GNSS Antenna Comparison-for Bistatic Application Johan](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040718/5e2522cd75570943e90eaf8f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
University of Colorado
PRN 07- L1 Measurement
• Three L1 C/No traces for PRN07 (taken over three different days)
• Pinwheel is stable (except as PRN7 set)
• Antcom exhibits a “nice” pattern during rise
• Monopole has deeper fades but appears sporadic
• In summary, results are as expected
![Page 11: GNSS Antenna Comparison -for Bistatic Applicationcongress.cimne.com/gnss-r10/frontal/presentaciones/123.pdf · 2010-12-07 · GNSS Antenna Comparison-for Bistatic Application Johan](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040718/5e2522cd75570943e90eaf8f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
University of Colorado
PRN 07 L2C CM+CL Measurement
• Three L2 C/No traces for PRN07 (taken over three different days)
• Pinwheel is stable
• Antcom exhibits a “nice” pattern during rise
• Monopole has deeper fades but still appears sporadic
• In summary, smoother traces but more characteristic fluctuations than the L1 measurements
![Page 12: GNSS Antenna Comparison -for Bistatic Applicationcongress.cimne.com/gnss-r10/frontal/presentaciones/123.pdf · 2010-12-07 · GNSS Antenna Comparison-for Bistatic Application Johan](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040718/5e2522cd75570943e90eaf8f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
University of Colorado
PRN 17 Sky-plot
SE
N
rise
set
•The location of the antenna (Univ of Colorado Engineering Building) and sky trace of satellite of interest (PRN17) are illustrated
![Page 13: GNSS Antenna Comparison -for Bistatic Applicationcongress.cimne.com/gnss-r10/frontal/presentaciones/123.pdf · 2010-12-07 · GNSS Antenna Comparison-for Bistatic Application Johan](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040718/5e2522cd75570943e90eaf8f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
University of Colorado
PRN 17 – L1 Measurement
• Three L1 C/No traces for PRN17 -taken over three different days - sweet spot for the monopole
• Pinwheel provides strong expected arc
• Antcom has a “nice” far field reflection pattern during rise
• Monopole have a stronger fluctuation and is a bit sporadic as the satellite sets
• In summary, clearer far field reflection than PRN 7
![Page 14: GNSS Antenna Comparison -for Bistatic Applicationcongress.cimne.com/gnss-r10/frontal/presentaciones/123.pdf · 2010-12-07 · GNSS Antenna Comparison-for Bistatic Application Johan](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040718/5e2522cd75570943e90eaf8f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
University of Colorado
PRN 17 L2C CM+CL Measurement• Three L2 C/No traces for PRN17 -taken over three different days - sweet spot for the monopole
• Pinwheel provides strong expected arc
• Antcom continues to show a “nice” far field reflection pattern during rise (limited LHCP rejection?)
• Monopole has the desired stronger fades and continues to be sporadic as the satellite sets
• In summary, more clarity for the desired/fluctuations than the L1 signal on PRN17 and both signals on PRN7
![Page 15: GNSS Antenna Comparison -for Bistatic Applicationcongress.cimne.com/gnss-r10/frontal/presentaciones/123.pdf · 2010-12-07 · GNSS Antenna Comparison-for Bistatic Application Johan](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040718/5e2522cd75570943e90eaf8f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
University of Colorado
Presentation Outline
• L2 antenna introduction/overview
• DLC rooftop, 24h data collection with: – JN L2-horiz. antenna– Novatel Pinwheel antenna– Antcom L1L2L5 antenna
• SNR for two fix heights• SDR Efforts• Proposed future work
![Page 16: GNSS Antenna Comparison -for Bistatic Applicationcongress.cimne.com/gnss-r10/frontal/presentaciones/123.pdf · 2010-12-07 · GNSS Antenna Comparison-for Bistatic Application Johan](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040718/5e2522cd75570943e90eaf8f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
University of Colorado
SNR for two fix heights
![Page 17: GNSS Antenna Comparison -for Bistatic Applicationcongress.cimne.com/gnss-r10/frontal/presentaciones/123.pdf · 2010-12-07 · GNSS Antenna Comparison-for Bistatic Application Johan](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040718/5e2522cd75570943e90eaf8f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
University of Colorado
PRN7 Sky-plot
SE
N
rise
End time
•The location of the antenna (Univ of Colorado Engineering Building) and sky trace of satellite of interest (PRN07) are illustrated
![Page 18: GNSS Antenna Comparison -for Bistatic Applicationcongress.cimne.com/gnss-r10/frontal/presentaciones/123.pdf · 2010-12-07 · GNSS Antenna Comparison-for Bistatic Application Johan](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040718/5e2522cd75570943e90eaf8f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
University of Colorado
PRN 7
48,5in. dry Rain, wet
•At 1,2m height the monopole is getting a stronger effect (deeper fades) of the constructive and deconstructive interference when the surface is wet
![Page 19: GNSS Antenna Comparison -for Bistatic Applicationcongress.cimne.com/gnss-r10/frontal/presentaciones/123.pdf · 2010-12-07 · GNSS Antenna Comparison-for Bistatic Application Johan](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040718/5e2522cd75570943e90eaf8f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
University of Colorado
PRN 748,5in. Drypeak: 41.16power at 0.0001221Hz
Rain, wetpeak: 62.43power at 0.0001221Hz
•The differs in the magnitude of the power spectrum also gives the wet surface the advantage
![Page 20: GNSS Antenna Comparison -for Bistatic Applicationcongress.cimne.com/gnss-r10/frontal/presentaciones/123.pdf · 2010-12-07 · GNSS Antenna Comparison-for Bistatic Application Johan](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040718/5e2522cd75570943e90eaf8f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
University of Colorado
PRN 7
63,5in. drypeak: 32.34power at 0.0001221Hz
•While at 1,6m height the monopole is a more sporadic on the measurement and a weaker result compare with the lower height
![Page 21: GNSS Antenna Comparison -for Bistatic Applicationcongress.cimne.com/gnss-r10/frontal/presentaciones/123.pdf · 2010-12-07 · GNSS Antenna Comparison-for Bistatic Application Johan](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040718/5e2522cd75570943e90eaf8f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
University of Colorado
Presentation Outline
• L2 antenna introduction/overview
• DLC rooftop, 24h data collection with: – JN L2-horiz. antenna– Novatel Pinwheel antenna– Antcom L1L2L5 antenna
• SNR for two fix heights• SDR Efforts• Proposed future work
![Page 22: GNSS Antenna Comparison -for Bistatic Applicationcongress.cimne.com/gnss-r10/frontal/presentaciones/123.pdf · 2010-12-07 · GNSS Antenna Comparison-for Bistatic Application Johan](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040718/5e2522cd75570943e90eaf8f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
University of Colorado
SDR Comparison (40min data set)
![Page 23: GNSS Antenna Comparison -for Bistatic Applicationcongress.cimne.com/gnss-r10/frontal/presentaciones/123.pdf · 2010-12-07 · GNSS Antenna Comparison-for Bistatic Application Johan](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040718/5e2522cd75570943e90eaf8f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
University of Colorado
PRN 15 NetR8
SE
N
•The logged RINEX file from NetR8 receiver follows a clear constructive/deconstructive interference under its constraints of the sensitivity software
![Page 24: GNSS Antenna Comparison -for Bistatic Applicationcongress.cimne.com/gnss-r10/frontal/presentaciones/123.pdf · 2010-12-07 · GNSS Antenna Comparison-for Bistatic Application Johan](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040718/5e2522cd75570943e90eaf8f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
University of Colorado
PRN 15 SDR
• Matlab SDR processing shows the same C/No profile
• Fails to lock on the exact phase; either L2C quarter cycle problem or merged processing of the CM and CL codes
• In summary, the SDR for the L2C code is under development with promising preliminary results
![Page 25: GNSS Antenna Comparison -for Bistatic Applicationcongress.cimne.com/gnss-r10/frontal/presentaciones/123.pdf · 2010-12-07 · GNSS Antenna Comparison-for Bistatic Application Johan](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022040718/5e2522cd75570943e90eaf8f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
University of Colorado
Proposed Future Work
• Work on GPS SDR code for L2C and L5 measurement (including GIOVE measurements)– Phase lock/data bit issues– Sensitivity– C/No estimators
• Assess other antenna designs
• Real time L2C GPS SDR receiver implementation