Download - GO Literature Example 3
-
8/13/2019 GO Literature Example 3
1/15
Implications of Graphic Organizers 1
Th
Implications of Graphic Organizers in the Classroom
Beth de Anda
Northern Illinois University
-
8/13/2019 GO Literature Example 3
2/15
Implications of Graphic Organizers 2
Theme/Problem Statement
How has the learning theory of cognitivism influenced the classroom of today? One way
it has been put to use in the classroom is by the ubiquitous use of graphic organizers (GOs) as
aids to improve comprehension. Typically a textbook used to include an outline of each chapter.
The second edition of Marcy P. Driscolls Psychology of Learning for Instruction, however, uses
concept maps to illustrate the interconnections and hierarchies of the chapters concepts.
Stemming from D. P. Ausubels development of an advance organizer to fill in the gaps of a
learners background knowledge, an enticing array of GOs have been developed to support and
facilitate student learning. But has there indeed been an increase in students cognitive abilities
when GOs are employed? If so, in what areas is enhanced cognition manifested? What
guidelines can one apply in the classroom from the various studies that have tracked the effects
of GOs?
Definition of a Graphic Organizer
A graphic organizer is an outline of concepts that uses two-dimensional spatial format to
illustrate connections and hierarchies between concepts. GOs present information visually. This
is what sets them apart from a traditional one-dimensional, linear outline. Andrew D. Katayama
and Steven M. Crooks state that GOs are a spatial arrangement of concepts to communicate
their relations, without spelling out the relations for the student. (2003) There are different types
of GOs such as matrices, tree diagrams, concept maps, Venn diagrams, rational set generators,
-
8/13/2019 GO Literature Example 3
3/15
Implications of Graphic Organizers 3
Theoretical Foundations of Graphic Organizers
D. P. Ausubel developed short summary paragraphs that were to be presented to students
prior to a learning activity. The purpose was to help students activate prior background
knowledge or to fill in the gaps of an inadequate foundation. It was a strategy that was designed
to help students actively engage in a task to make the learning meaningful. Other schema
theorists shared this concern with activating prior knowledge. Story maps that featured areas for
students to fill in the basic story elements of characters, setting, problem, events and solution
were found to enhance recall of the story for later retelling. (Marcy P. Driscoll, 2000). Driscoll
goes on to say that Ausubel deplored the common practice of textbook writers to
compartmentalize ideas or topics into separate chapters without exploring their relationships.
(P. 144, 2000) Hence, many GOs were developed to pick up on text clues of organization and
create a visual guide to the information such as a Venn diagram used in conjunction with a text
that compares and contrasts various elements. Other comparison organizers would be concept
trees and comparative organizers, which is a matrix that utilizes rows and columns to compare
and contrast ideas and concepts.
Trends/Patterns
From these early beginnings in schema theory, what trends and patterns have emerged in
conjunction with the use of GOs? Due to the wide variety and types of GOs its not surprising
that initially there were inconclusive patterns supporting their effectiveness. However, extensive
research in the utilization of GOs in schools and universities has begun to point to certain
-
8/13/2019 GO Literature Example 3
4/15
Implications of Graphic Organizers 4
effectiveness be ascertained or valuable instruction time is being wasted. Each of the five reports
that read pointed out areas in which use of GOs by students makes a difference and other areas
where their use leads to little or no improvement in learning.
Overall, GOs are effective in providing visual clues as to the hierarchy and
interconnections of concepts. Reading of text requires that students make these connections on
their own. Textbooks try to give clues about the organization through headings, subheadings and
chapters, but not every reader is able to make such inferences. Learning disabled (LD) students
especially seem to be unable to make such connections. Giving students an opportunity to
review text material with a GO supports students in making these connections that signify a
higher order of understanding.
There is evidence, however, that points to the idea that giving a student a ready made GO
that requires nothing more from the student than to study it is not the most effective method in
utilizing GOs. Chang, Sung & Chen in their study on concept-mapping strategies found that
partially completed concept maps were more effective in helping students increase their recall of
the concepts and in application of the concepts to novel situations. Most effective of all were
map correction activities in which students were given concept maps wherein approximately
60% of the information was incorrect. As students worked with the concept map, they had to
look for the inaccuracies and correct them. This is a different way to use concept maps, but it
proved to be highly effective. Students engaged in this activity were able to write better text
summaries than both the control group and the group using concept maps in a more standard
-
8/13/2019 GO Literature Example 3
5/15
Implications of Graphic Organizers 5
suggested that students who are actively engaged in some measure with the GO develop a deeper
understanding of the material. Being active in a learning activity requires more cognitive
engagement and makes such activities more meaningful.
If students are more cognitively engaged in their learning while utilizing GOs, then it
should stand to reason that students would have better recall of the concepts that they learned.
This, however, does not always hold true. Certain types of learning are not enhanced by the use
of GOs. Simple recall of facts is high immediately after use of the GO, but the same results are
found after reading text. Delay testing and recall drops just as fast in both groups. GOs were
shown to enhance recall of hierarchical and coordinate relations, comparing and contrasting
features, and applying knowledge to novel situations. (Robinson & Kiewra, 1995) Plus, students
found GOs a more user-friendly strategy to implement when studying. This is an important
consideration when working with unmotivated students or LD students who might be easily
overwhelmed with text material.
As a result of education requirements mandated by the No Child Left Behind Law
(NCLBL), it is critical that educators find more effective ways to increase learning in all students
in the classroom. This includes LD and English language learners (ELL). Because of the visual
nature of GOs, they hold great promise in this area. Kim, Vaughn, Wanzek and Wei (2004)
found significant benefits for LD students in GOs. They reviewed over 21 studies in order to
conclude that reading comprehension was increased when GOs were used in conjunction with
reading the text. One study, which did not support such findings, was found to include non-LD
-
8/13/2019 GO Literature Example 3
6/15
Implications of Graphic Organizers 6
Reflection Statement
The study of learning theories this semester has been very interesting to me as I can now
articulate why I am using certain strategies in my classroom. I understand now why certain
learning activities suggested by my reading and science basals are organized the way they are.
For example, the science textbook publisher has a series of worksheets that requires students to
answer true-false questions in such a way that any question that is false must be corrected to
make a true statement. This is a variation of the map-correction activity developed by Chang,
Sung, and Chen in their research on the effects of concept mapping. Such an activity requires
cognitive engagement as the student not only needs to judge whether the material is true or false
but must then reword any false statements to make them true. When looking for trends that
signify GOs that are effective, one must look for GOs that engage students in active or
meaningful learning. Presenting students with a GO such as Ausubels advance organizer or a
completed concept map does not actively engage students in their learning. They can sit back
and absorb the material, but there is no indication that it is being absorbed until the student is
assessed. At that point, it might be too late. Too often learning disabled students are passive
learners. Such students need to be encouraged at every step of the way to become active
participants in their learning. GOs that require their participation ensure cognitive engagement.
As with any learning strategy, there is no one size fits all. The research showed that GOs
had little or no effect on recall of facts. It would be a waste of time for teachers to employ GOs
in such a role then. Instead, strategies that are effective in enhancing recall such as mnemonic
-
8/13/2019 GO Literature Example 3
7/15
Implications of Graphic Organizers 7
RefReferences
Chang, K., Sung, Y., Chen, I. (2002). The effect of concept mapping to enhance text
comprehension and summarization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(1),5-23.
Driscoll, M. P. (2000).Psychology of Learning for Instruction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Katayama, A. D., & Crooks, S. M. (2003). Online notes: differential effects of studying complete
or partial graphically organized notes. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(4),
293-312.
Kim, A., Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., & Wei, S. (2004). Graphic organizers and their effects on the
reading comprehension of students with ld: a sysnthesis of research. Journal of Learning
Disabilities, 37(2),105-118.
Robinson, D. H., & Kiewra, K. A. (1995). Visual argument: graphic organizers are superior to
outlines in improving learning from text.Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3),455-
467.
Schorzman, E. M., & Cheek, E. H. (2004). Structured strategy instruction: investigating an
intervention for improving sixth-graders reading comprehension.Reading Psychology,
25, 37-60.
-
8/13/2019 GO Literature Example 3
8/15
-
8/13/2019 GO Literature Example 3
9/15
-
8/13/2019 GO Literature Example 3
10/15
-
8/13/2019 GO Literature Example 3
11/15
Implications of Graphic Organizers 11
590_deanda_literature_v1
Article Title Issue(s) Theoreticalframework Author assumptions/Ideas Conclusion
-
8/13/2019 GO Literature Example 3
12/15
-
8/13/2019 GO Literature Example 3
13/15
-
8/13/2019 GO Literature Example 3
14/15
-
8/13/2019 GO Literature Example 3
15/15
Implications of Graphic Organizers 15
590_deanda_literature_v1