GRAPHICS ONEPORTFOLIO
IAN MCGEEARST 453DEC. 17/16
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ORTHOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS 1
PRECEDENT DRAWINGS 3
TRANSFORMATIVE EXPLORATIONS 7
MAPPING MATERIAL FLOWS 9
IMAGE MANIPULATIONS 13
ALGORITHMIC MANIPULATION 17
SURFACE MANIPULATION 21
DATA DRIVEN ASSEMBLIES 25
FABRICATION 29
OR
THO
GR
AP
HIC
PR
OJE
CTI
ON
S
IAN MCGEE1
PROCESS
A series of rough sketches were pro-duced in an attempt to understand how
to represent an irregualar threedimensional object through
architectural drawings. In these sketches speculations were made
about the interior of the object and how best to represent it.
After these sketches, refined versions were created and build upon the
speculative foundations established in the rough sketch phase.
OR
THO
GR
AP
HIC
PR
OJE
CTI
ON
S
IAN MCGEE 2
REFINED
ELEVATION I
ELEVATION II
AXONOMETRICSECTION I
SECTION II
TOP VIEW
OR
THO
GR
AP
HIC
PR
OJE
CTI
ON
S
IAN MCGEE 2
REFINED
ELEVATION I
ELEVATION II
AXONOMETRICSECTION I
SECTION II
TOP VIEW
PRECEDENTDRAWINGS
PR
EC
ED
EN
T D
RAW
ING
S
IAN MCGEE 4
PROCESS
Quick research sketches of a precedent house were developed as a means of understanding the
tectonics of the structre. In this case, Peter Eisenman’s House VI was looked at in an attempt
to comprehend the relative size of its spaces and of the objects inhabiting the space. These drawings
are used as templates in order to create digitally rendered drawings the proper scale using Rhino.
Certain elements were also picked out in colour in these drawings as a way to easily identify how
specific elements interact, which was useful when digitially recreating thee drawings.These prelimi-
nary sketches served as excellent resources when trying to understand the intricacies of House VI and
its many extraneous elements.
PR
EC
ED
EN
T D
RAW
ING
S
IAN MCGEE5
DIGITAL
east section
west section
ground floor plans
PR
EC
ED
EN
T D
RAW
ING
S
IAN MCGEE 6
DIGITAL
south elevation
west elevation
first floor plans
TRANSFORMATIVEEXPLORATIONS
Original Portion Of House
This portion of House VI emphasizes the linear geometric form of the structure. By having perpendicular component parts, this piece also hints at the grid structure which isan integral part of House VI’s design concept. By transforming this piece through a calculated process the final object will have a conceptual connection to House VI, though the aesthetic qualities will be very different.
Rotation Polar Array Mirror
Shift
CopyScale
Rendered Image
Elevation View
Top View
TRA
NS
FOR
MAT
IVE
EXP
LOR
ATIO
NS
IAN MCGEE 8
TRANSFORMATIONS
Section View
MAPPING IMMATERIAL
FLOWS
MA
PP
ING
IMM
ATE
RIA
L FL
OW
S
IAN MCGEE 10
SITE
secluded areas created by vegetation insufficient artificial lighting
factors contributing to sense of vulnerability
From day to night, the site transitions from being an open and well lit space with fairly high traffic volume to a very dark space with a low usage. Late at night, areas of the site can make the person engaging the site feel uneasy or vulnerable. Determining how to map these immaterial sensations poses a potential problem. In the case a feeling of vulnerability on the site at night, it was decided that the most effective way to map this was by creating an ‘artificial topography’.
N
12:00 AM
3:30 AM
POINTS
OF
VULNERABILITY
no percieved sense of vulnerability before
12:00 AM
MA
PP
ING
IMM
ATE
RIA
L FL
OW
S
IAN MCGEE11
ARTIFICIAL TOPOGRAPHY
By extending the points from the percieved vulnerability map into three dimensions, an artificial topography can be created. This artificial topography creates what is essentially a bar graph from the terrain extending the areas of increased sense of vulnerability higher.
In the model, the trees are depicted as seperating the terrain into distnctspaces. This is because the vulnerability graph is largely contingent upon both the secluded areas defined by the trees as well as the absence or presence of artifical light on the site. eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan et iusto
IMAGEMANIPULATIONS
IMA
GE
MA
NIP
ULA
TIO
NS
IAN MCGEE 14
PROCESS
15
30
45
60
75
150%
200%
90
copyrotate
selection oncenter
copymirror along
y - axis
copymirror along
x - axis
copyscale up
copyscale up
horizontally
copyrotate on
center
crop
PSEUDO-CODE
Having an understanding how different software affects an image differently is a valuable resource. Through this exercise, I manipulated
the same image using the same process in three different softwares, each yeilding slightly different results and then placed the final product
into an urban setting.
PHOTOSHOP ILLUSTRATOR RHINO
IMA
GE
MA
NIP
ULA
TIO
NS
IAN MCGEE15
RESULTS
PHO
TOSH
OP
ILLU
STRA
TOR
RHIN
O
ITERATIONS
IMA
GE
MA
NIP
ULA
TIO
NS
IAN MCGEE 16
CONTEXT
IMA
GE
MA
NIP
ULA
TIO
NS
IAN MCGEE 16
CONTEXT
ALGORITHMICMANIPULATION
ALG
OR
ITH
MIC
MA
NIP
ULA
TIO
N
IAN MCGEE 18
VISUAL CODING
create point in desired location
from point, create a square
copy the square and paste it above the firstsquare the same distance as the length of
the square
a
a
a
rotate the upper square 12.857
loft between the upper and lower squares
cap the object
copy the curve of the upper square and pasteit above the upper square
repeat steps 3 to 7 five more times
repeat step 3 to 6 one time
variations1
2
3
4
5
6
7
rotate the upper square by the current height of the structure
copy the square and paste it above the first square according to the present rotation of the structure
from the bottom cube
copy the curve of the upper square and scale the square to 75% of the
previous square
aa = r
r
hr
r = h
s
p s = 75% p
This excercise explores how software such as grasshopper can be used to create geometric manipulations by using a
repeating algorithm. In this example, Santiago Calatrava’s Turning Torso tower is used as an example of
repeating geometry which creates a cohesive object.
Variation can be achieved with minor modification to the algorithm
ALG
OR
ITH
MIC
MA
NIP
ULA
TIO
N
IAN MCGEE19
ADAPTATIONinitial pseudo-code
create point in desired location
from point, create a square
copy the square and paste it above the first square the same distance as the length of the square
rotate the upper square 12.857
loft between the upper and lower squares
cap the object
copy the curve of the upper squareand paste it above the upper square
repeat steps 3 to 7 five more times
repeat step 3 to 6 one time
new pseudo-codeset rectangle in grasshopper
move new rectangle up above originalrectangle the distance of the lengthof the square
use polygon center to find center of rectangle
convert degrees to radians
rotate upper square 12.857
loft between the two squares
cap the object
copy the curve of the upper squareand paste it above the upper square
repeat steps 3 to 7 five more times
repeat step 3 to 6 one time
changesset rectangle
initial new
drag rectangle from point
rectangle
set rectangle
reason - no drag rectangle from point option
find centerinitial new
no defined pivot point rotate on center point
reason - need consitent acurate rotations
convert degrees
initial new
assumed that unitswould be in degrees
converted degrees toradians
reason - without converting degrees to radians the object over-rotates
rectangle
a
a
degrees radians
12.857
ALG
OR
ITH
MIC
MA
NIP
ULA
TIO
NS
IAN MCGEE 20
CONTEXT AND ITERATIONS
iterations
As the structure developsupwards, the rotation of eachcomponent rectangle is increased by a multiple corresponding to the order of the rectangle in the upward sequence beginning with a rotation of 12.857 in the first rectangle.
1x
2x
3x4x
5x
6x
7x
(12.857 )
(25.714 )
(38.571 )
(51.428 )
(64.258 )
(77.142 )
(77.142 )
As the structure developsupwards, the height of eachcomponent cube is decreased by 75% based on the height of the cube below.
100%
-75%
-75%
-75%-75%-75%-75%
In this iteration, the top and bottom cubes are doubled inheight and remaining cubes decrease in height towards themiddle by a rate of 75% of theprevious cube. Both the top and bottom cube have a rotation of 12.875 and this increases towards the middle by a rate of 2 times greater than the previous cube’s rotation until the middle cube is reached. 200%
200%
-75%
-75%
-75%
-75%-75%
(12.857 )
(12.857 )
(25.714 )
(25.714 )
(38.571 )
(38.571 )
(51.428 )
As the structure developsupwards, the scale of eachcomponent cube is decreased by 75% based on the scale of the cube below.
100%
-75%
-75%
-75%
-75%
-75%
-75%
As the structure developsupwards, the x and z axis of each component cube areincreased by 25% based on the cube below.
+25%+25%+25%+25%
+25%
+25%
+25%
urban context
Various iterations are achieved through a slight manipulation in the algorithm. With
each of these manipulations, vastly different results are reached.
SURFACE MANIPULATION
SU
RFA
CE
MA
NIP
ULA
TIO
N
IAN MCGEE 22
PSEUDO-CODE
PSEUDO-CODE
ATTRACTOR
VARIABILITY
create curve recreating the rotation in turning torso
measure curve’s distance fromsmall rectangles
distance from curve turns on oroff small rectanges
measure curve’s distance fromsmall rectangles
distance from curve determines they-axis extrusion of small rectangles
create surface divide surface into grid subdivide grid further
using the points from the grid... create large and small rectangleto echo the cubes in turning torso
patch between rectangles to createa surface with rectangular holes
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
4 5 6
distance from points and shapeof curve produce variability
density of grid produces variability
initial shape of surfaceproduces variability
using a shape other than rectangles produces variability
create curve recreating the rotation in turning torso
Using algorithmically based production methods can develop geometries that would otherwise be diffficult to create. Through grasshopper, intricate surfaces can be developed and manipulated easily. This pseudo-code shows the development of such a surface.
SU
RFA
CE
MA
NIP
ULA
TIO
N
IAN MCGEE23
SURFACE MANIPULATION
create a surface by lofting two curves
divide surface into grid using ‘divide domain’ and ‘isotrim’
further divide grid using ‘divide domain’ and ‘isotrim’
using ‘deconstruct brep’, identify the faces of the geometry in the grid
using ‘area’, find the center of each of the faces of the geometry
using ‘scale’, create a network of small and large rectangles in the grids
using ‘surface split’, turn the small and large rectangles into holes through the surface
create curve and (or) point measure distance between grid and curve and (or) point using ‘curve closest point’ (for curve) and (or) ‘distance’ (for point)
using ‘larger than’, remove any small rectangles smaller than set size. Dispatch results as a surface
create curve and (or) point using ‘curve closest point’, measure distance between grid of small rectangles and curve
use ‘curve closest point’ to determine the amplitude, extrude in both positive and negative directions along the y-axis
pseudo-code
attractor I attractor II
in the context of Mies van der Rohe’s Neue Gallery in Berlin, Germany
SU
RFA
CE
MA
NIP
ULA
TIO
NS
IAN MCGEE 24
ITERATIONSno removal of grid by attractor curve no removal of grid by attractor curve
non-linear curve input
linear attractor curve attractor point
attractor pointnon-linear curve input
Lorem ipsum
attractor pointextrusion amplified
attractor point amplifiednon-linear curve input
attractor curvenon-linear curve input
DATADRIVEN
ASSEMBLIES
DAT
A D
RIV
EN
AS
SE
MB
LIE
S
IAN MCGEE 26
INITIAL PSEUDO-CODE
change in RGB/hue values change in RGB/hue values
orignial shape change in polygons change in polygonschange in RGB values
change in polygonschange in RGB values
change in RGB/hue values
variation
I II III IV
V VI VII
create surface define grid create rectangles basedon R and G values in center of grid cell
create circles basedon B values
move the circles along Z axis according to hue loft between geometry cap geometry
pseudo
code
flow along a 3-D surface
I II
III IIIselect object unwrap object
situate surface on objectthrough UV coordinates
reassemble object with new surface
selected
image
This excercise focuses on creating a three dimensionalfrom a two dimensional surface using grasshopper. Thistype of three dimensional mapping is especially usefulfor creating interesting building facades and for regulating light diffusion through a surface.
DAT
A D
RIV
EN
AS
SE
MB
LIE
S
IAN MCGEE27
MAPPING TO SURFACE
V
VI
VII
I II III IV
create surface define grid create rectangles based on R and G values using ‘remap numbers’ to change the colour’s domain from 0 -1 to 1 - 1.5
create rectangles based on B values using ‘remap numbers’ to change the colour’s domain from 0-1 to 1 - 1.5
move the circles in the direction of the normals based on the ‘remapped’ RGB values
V
VI
VII
‘loft’ between the rectangles and the circles and ‘cap holes’
‘loft’ between the rectangles and the
circles and ‘cap holes’
create a 3D surface by replacing the initial flat surface in grasshopper with a 3-D object and build the geometry on
this 3D surface
move the circles in the direction of the
normals based on an average of the RGB
values added with the value of the normal
vector
3-D transformation II
create surface
I
create cylinder
IIuse ‘unroll surface’to seperate cylinder
III
use ‘�ow along surface’to merge created surface to surface of cylinder
IV
V�ow along surface
3-D transformation I 3-D transformation Icreate a 3D surface by replacing the initial flat surface with a 3-D object and build the geometry on the 3D surface
DAT
A D
RIV
EN
AS
SE
MB
LIE
S
IAN MCGEE 28
ITERATIONSnormals controlled by RGB values
�ow along surface
20 x 20 UV Grid 35 x 35 UV Grid 50 x 50 UV Grid 85 x 85UV Grid
FAB
RIC
ATIO
N T
OO
LS
IAN MCGEE 30
MEASURED CONTEXTS
70'-2
.75"
29'-9
.25"
8'-3
"
28'-7
"
34'-10"
47'-9"
2'-11.25"2'-11.25"1'-4.5"
12'-5" 10'-6.25"
4'-3
.5"
4'-11.5"
63'-10.75"
3'-11.5"
3'-10"
5'-1.5"
4'-8.75"
28'-7.75"
4'-7"
12'-6.5"
13'-5.59"
4'-5.75"
1'-0
.5 "
7'-3
"3'
-6.5
"
7'-3
"4'
-0.2
4"
7'-3
"3'
-6.7
5"
7'-3
"3'
-11.
5"
7'-3
"3'
-6.5
"
7'-3
"1'
-2.5
"
5'-8
.75"
3'-1
1.5"
2'-1.75"
2'-9
"
19'-2
.75"
19'-5
.25"
19'-8
.5"
1'-1
0.25
"
1'-6.75"
1'-1
0.25
"
1'-6.75"
1'-5
.25"
1'-7"
47
3
5
5
34
7
Scal
e
Dra
wn
by
Dat
e
Proj
ect n
umbe
rAs
sign
men
t 09
Kels
ey B
raun
Ian
McG
eeSa
hil K
hakh
arSt
eve
Belt
Julie
Sor
ense
n
Nov
. 20,
201
6
A9-1
No.
Des
crip
tion
Dat
e
Fabr
icat
ion
Tool
s 1:
M
easu
red
Con
text
s
As In
dica
ted
WES
T EL
EVAT
ION
1/8”
= 1
’4
13'-11.5"9'-5"4'-6.5"
1'
7'-2.5"5'-6.5"
10" 1'3'-1.5"
9'-8
"16
'-1.7
5"4'
-5.7
5"11
'-1"
10'-6
.25"
2'-1
1.25
"1'
-4.5
"2'
-11.
25"
12'-5
"2'
-1.7
5"
1'-7
.75"
1'4'
47'-9
"
SOU
TH E
LEVA
TIO
N1/
8” =
1’
6
4'-6.5" 1'-0.01" 8'-4.91"13'-11.42"
3'-1.5"5.5"
6'2'-5"
28'-7
"8'
-3"
2"2'
-3.5
"2'
-6.7
5"6"
3.25
"
19'-7
.75"
1'-6
.03"
4'-0
.25"
70'-2
.75"
2
EAST
ELE
VATI
ON
31/
8” =
1’
NO
RTH
ELE
VATI
ON
51/
8” =
1’
PLAN
11/
8” =
1’
REF
LEC
TED
CEI
LIN
G P
LAN
1/8”
= 1
’
Gra
phic
s 1
64'-4
.6"
13'-11.5"
1'-0
.5"
7'-3
"3'
-6.4
5"7'
-3"
1'-2.2
5" 1'-8.2
5"1'-
1.88"
7'-3
"3'
-6.7
5"7'
-3"
1'-2
"
1'-8.2
5"1'-
1.25"
7'-3
"3'
-6.5
"7'
-3"
1'-2.5
2"
63'-1
0.73
"
3'-6
"3'
-1.5
"3'
-1.5
"2'
-9.5
"4'
-7"
12'-6
.5"
3'-1
0.5"
3'-1
0.5"
3'-1
0.5"
3'-1
0.5"
1'-7
"3'
-10.
25"
3'-1
0.23
"3'
-10.
22"
5'-1
.5"
3'-1
0"1'
-11.
25"1
'-6"
1'
28'-7
.73"
13'-4
.75"
13'-11.5"
8'-5"1'
9'-0.5"
6'
47'-9
"
8 9
6
7SE
CTI
ON
I
N
1'-11.89"
3.42
"
1.46
"
8'-4.55"
9'-7.17"
9'-9.46"2.23"
3.47" 1.94"
1.99"
1.96
"
1.44"2.02"1.92"
12
3
45
6
9
12
3
45678
9
2.1"
1.92"1.98"
2'-0.72"
7"
1'-2
.34" 5.
61"
1.9" 3.
48"
1.26"
6.89
"
7.59
"
3.94"2.11"
1'-10.21"2.55"
INTE
RIO
R W
ALL
SEC
TIO
N1/
4” =
1’
EXTE
RIO
R W
ALL
SEC
TIO
N1/
4” =
1’
13'-9.31"1'-9.76"2'-2.31"
1'-0.19"7"
7'-4.19"5'-2.91"
2'-6.22"
58'-0
.17"
5.61
"
5'-9
.09"
2'-6
.51"
4.6"
11.1
9"1'
-2.7
2"2'
-2.9
3"
13'-8
"1'
56
7
8
9
11
2
10
1112
3
4
LEG
END
8 - I
NTE
RIO
R W
ALL
SEC
TIO
N
1 - G
YPSU
M B
OAR
D2
- STE
EL S
TUD
S3
- AC
OU
STIC
AL C
EILI
NG
TIL
ES4
- Q-D
ECK
5 - C
ON
CR
ETE
SLAB
6 - R
IGID
INSU
LATI
ON
7 - A
LUM
INU
M W
IND
OW
FR
AME
8 - R
ED B
RIC
K VE
NEE
R9
- STE
EL J
OIS
T
9 - E
XTER
IOR
WAL
LSE
CTI
ON
1 - G
YPSU
M B
OAR
D2
- STE
EL S
TUD
S3
- AC
OU
STIC
AL C
EILI
NG
TIL
ES4
- Q-D
ECK
5 - C
ON
CR
ETE
SLAB
6 - R
IGID
INSU
LATI
ON
7 - A
LUM
INU
M W
IND
OW
FR
AME
8 - R
ED B
RIC
K VE
NEE
R9
- STE
EL J
OIS
T
10 -
SEC
TIO
N I
1 - G
YPSU
M B
OAR
D2
- FAB
RIC
AC
OU
STIC
AL W
ALL
PAN
EL3
- STE
EL S
TUD
S4
- AC
OU
STIC
AL C
EILI
NG
TIL
ES5
- Q-D
ECK
6 - C
ON
CR
ETE
SLAB
7 - R
IGID
INSU
LATI
ON
8 - A
LUM
INU
M W
IND
OW
FR
AME
9 - R
ED B
RIC
K VE
NEE
R10
- ST
EEL
JOIS
T11
- ST
EEL
POST
12 -
HVA
C D
UC
T
v
1/8”
= 1
’
4'-6" 1'-6.75" 1'-6.75"
1'-7
.75"
70'-3
.03"
6'-2
.66"
48'-9.17"34'-1.18"
11'-4.75"
49'-8.73" 9'-11"7'
3'-8.77" 1'-0.22"5'
1'-7.44"
FABRICATION
FAB
RIC
ATIO
N T
OO
LS
IAN MCGEE 30
MEASURED CONTEXTS
70'-2
.75"
29'-9
.25"
8'-3
"
28'-7
"
34'-10"
47'-9"
2'-11.25"2'-11.25"1'-4.5"
12'-5" 10'-6.25"
4'-3
.5"
4'-11.5"
63'-10.75"
3'-11.5"
3'-10"
5'-1.5"
4'-8.75"
28'-7.75"
4'-7"
12'-6.5"
13'-5.59"
4'-5.75"
1'-0
.5 "
7'-3
"3'
-6.5
"
7'-3
"4'
-0.2
4"
7'-3
"3'
-6.7
5"
7'-3
"3'
-11.
5"
7'-3
"3'
-6.5
"
7'-3
"1'
-2.5
"
5'-8
.75"
3'-1
1.5"
2'-1.75"
2'-9
"
19'-2
.75"
19'-5
.25"
19'-8
.5"
1'-1
0.25
"
1'-6.75"
1'-1
0.25
"
1'-6.75"
1'-5
.25"
1'-7"
47
3
5
5
34
7
Scal
e
Dra
wn
by
Dat
e
Proj
ect n
umbe
rAs
sign
men
t 09
Kels
ey B
raun
Ian
McG
eeSa
hil K
hakh
arSt
eve
Belt
Julie
Sor
ense
n
Nov
. 20,
201
6
A9-1
No.
Des
crip
tion
Dat
e
Fabr
icat
ion
Tool
s 1:
M
easu
red
Con
text
s
As In
dica
ted
WES
T EL
EVAT
ION
1/8”
= 1
’4
13'-11.5"9'-5"4'-6.5"
1'
7'-2.5"5'-6.5"
10" 1'3'-1.5"
9'-8
"16
'-1.7
5"4'
-5.7
5"11
'-1"
10'-6
.25"
2'-1
1.25
"1'
-4.5
"2'
-11.
25"
12'-5
"2'
-1.7
5"
1'-7
.75"
1'4'
47'-9
"
SOU
TH E
LEVA
TIO
N1/
8” =
1’
6
4'-6.5" 1'-0.01" 8'-4.91"13'-11.42"
3'-1.5"5.5"
6'2'-5"
28'-7
"8'
-3"
2"2'
-3.5
"2'
-6.7
5"6"
3.25
"
19'-7
.75"
1'-6
.03"
4'-0
.25"
70'-2
.75"
2
EAST
ELE
VATI
ON
31/
8” =
1’
NO
RTH
ELE
VATI
ON
51/
8” =
1’
PLAN
11/
8” =
1’
REF
LEC
TED
CEI
LIN
G P
LAN
1/8”
= 1
’
Gra
phic
s 1
64'-4
.6"
13'-11.5"
1'-0
.5"
7'-3
"3'
-6.4
5"7'
-3"
1'-2.2
5" 1'-8.2
5"1'-
1.88"
7'-3
"3'
-6.7
5"7'
-3"
1'-2
"
1'-8.2
5"1'-
1.25"
7'-3
"3'
-6.5
"7'
-3"
1'-2.5
2"
63'-1
0.73
"
3'-6
"3'
-1.5
"3'
-1.5
"2'
-9.5
"4'
-7"
12'-6
.5"
3'-1
0.5"
3'-1
0.5"
3'-1
0.5"
3'-1
0.5"
1'-7
"3'
-10.
25"
3'-1
0.23
"3'
-10.
22"
5'-1
.5"
3'-1
0"1'
-11.
25"1
'-6"
1'
28'-7
.73"
13'-4
.75"
13'-11.5"
8'-5"1'
9'-0.5"
6'
47'-9
"
8 9
6
7SE
CTI
ON
I
N
1'-11.89"
3.42
"
1.46
"
8'-4.55"
9'-7.17"
9'-9.46"2.23"
3.47" 1.94"
1.99"
1.96
"
1.44"2.02"1.92"
12
3
45
6
9
12
3
45678
9
2.1"
1.92"1.98"
2'-0.72"
7"
1'-2
.34" 5.
61"
1.9" 3.
48"
1.26"
6.89
"
7.59
"
3.94"2.11"
1'-10.21"2.55"
INTE
RIO
R W
ALL
SEC
TIO
N1/
4” =
1’
EXTE
RIO
R W
ALL
SEC
TIO
N1/
4” =
1’
13'-9.31"1'-9.76"2'-2.31"
1'-0.19"7"
7'-4.19"5'-2.91"
2'-6.22"
58'-0
.17"
5.61
"
5'-9
.09"
2'-6
.51"
4.6"
11.1
9"1'
-2.7
2"2'
-2.9
3"
13'-8
"1'
56
7
8
9
11
2
10
1112
3
4
LEG
END
8 - I
NTE
RIO
R W
ALL
SEC
TIO
N
1 - G
YPSU
M B
OAR
D2
- STE
EL S
TUD
S3
- AC
OU
STIC
AL C
EILI
NG
TIL
ES4
- Q-D
ECK
5 - C
ON
CR
ETE
SLAB
6 - R
IGID
INSU
LATI
ON
7 - A
LUM
INU
M W
IND
OW
FR
AME
8 - R
ED B
RIC
K VE
NEE
R9
- STE
EL J
OIS
T
9 - E
XTER
IOR
WAL
LSE
CTI
ON
1 - G
YPSU
M B
OAR
D2
- STE
EL S
TUD
S3
- AC
OU
STIC
AL C
EILI
NG
TIL
ES4
- Q-D
ECK
5 - C
ON
CR
ETE
SLAB
6 - R
IGID
INSU
LATI
ON
7 - A
LUM
INU
M W
IND
OW
FR
AME
8 - R
ED B
RIC
K VE
NEE
R9
- STE
EL J
OIS
T
10 -
SEC
TIO
N I
1 - G
YPSU
M B
OAR
D2
- FAB
RIC
AC
OU
STIC
AL W
ALL
PAN
EL3
- STE
EL S
TUD
S4
- AC
OU
STIC
AL C
EILI
NG
TIL
ES5
- Q-D
ECK
6 - C
ON
CR
ETE
SLAB
7 - R
IGID
INSU
LATI
ON
8 - A
LUM
INU
M W
IND
OW
FR
AME
9 - R
ED B
RIC
K VE
NEE
R10
- ST
EEL
JOIS
T11
- ST
EEL
POST
12 -
HVA
C D
UC
T
v
1/8”
= 1
’
4'-6" 1'-6.75" 1'-6.75"
1'-7
.75"
70'-3
.03"
6'-2
.66"
48'-9.17"34'-1.18"
11'-4.75"
49'-8.73" 9'-11"7'
3'-8.77" 1'-0.22"5'
1'-7.44"
FAB
RIC
ATIO
N T
OO
LS
IAN MCGEE31
ARTICULATION
I II III IV
V VI VII VIII
DEFINE A SURFACE MANIPULATE POINTS ON SURFACE
CREATE AN OBJECT WITH SURFICIAL MANIPULATIONS
MORPH THE OBJECT TOTHE SURFACE
CREATE A VORONOIPATTERN FROM A CLOUD OF POINTS
MAP THE VORONOITO THE SURFACE
OFFSET AND EXTRUDE THE VORONOI TO CREATE DEPTH
PLACE THE VORONOISURFACE AND THE MORPHED SURFACETOGETHER
THIS DESIGN CONSIDERS ELEMENTS OF TEXTURE, PATTERN, AND TOPOLOGY IN THE FINAL ITERATION. TEXTURE IS USED IN THEINITIAL SURFACE DESIGN THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A 3-D OBJECT AS TOOL TO CREATE THE PATTERN OF THE SURFACE.PATTERN IS CREATED THROUGH BOTH THE CREATION OF A VORONOI SURFACE AND THE REPETITION OF 3-D GEOMETRY IN THE INITIAL SURFACE. TOPOLOGY IS INFLUENCED BY THE MANIPULATION OF THE INITIAL SURFACE INTO A FORM THAT EMULATESTHE DRAPE OF FABRIC.
DO
CU
ME
NTS
FO
R C
ON
STR
UC
TIO
N
IAN MCGEE 32
CONSTRUCTION
Assignment 9C/
TECHNICAL DRAWINGS
Ian McGee
Mateo Rodriguez
Jesse Siegle
Dhruv Soni
12/05/2016
EVDS GRAPHICS
DO
CU
ME
NTS
FO
R C
ON
STR
UC
TIO
N
IAN MCGEE33
CONSTRUCTION
SECTION THROUGH ROW B
Scale 1:24
S3
SECTION THROUGH ROW A
Scale 1:24
S2
SECTION THROUGH COLUMN 8
Scale 1:24
S1
DETAIL OF ATTACHMENT SYSTEM
Scale 1: 2
D2COMPONENT TOP ELEVATION
Scale 1: 8
D1
Scale 1: 8
D4COMPONENT SECTION
Scale 1: 8
D3 COMPONENT SECTION
D3
D4
3”
.75” .75”
2”
.75”
1.5”
1.5”
2.5” 3”
Circular “L” Bracket
“L” bracket
Transparent Cast Resin
Aluminum
Laminated Aluminum Panel
Assignment 9C/
TECHNICAL DRAWINGS
Ian McGee
Mateo Rodriguez
Jesse Siegle
Dhruv Soni
12/05/2016
Notes/
Page 5/7
DO
CU
ME
NTS
FO
R C
ON
STR
UC
TIO
N
IAN MCGEE 34
CONSTRUCTION
A
B
C
D
E
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
REVERSED CEILING PLAN
Scale 1:24
P1
D2
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S2
23’ 4 1/2”
8’ 2 3/8”
11/4”
1’ 7 7/8”
1’ 7 5/8
11/4”
A1
SECTION THROUGH ROW E
Scale 1:24
S7
D1
SECTION THROUGH ROW D
Scale 1:24
S6
SECTION THROUGH ROW C
Scale 1:24
S4
Assignment 9C/
TECHNICAL DRAWINGS
Ian McGee
Mateo Rodriguez
Jesse Siegle
Dhruv Soni
12/05/2016
Notes/
Page 4/7
DO
CU
ME
NTS
FO
R C
ON
STR
UC
TIO
N
IAN MCGEE35
CONSTRUCTION
20.4”
100” 100” 81.75”
19.7
96.1875”
D L d l D L d l D L d l D L d l D L d l D L d l D L d l D L d l D L d l D L d l D L d l D L d l D L d l D L d lA 1.60 0.16 0.81 4.80 1.52 1.49 0.76 4.47 1.46 1.39 0.73 4.16 1.38 1.29 0.69 3.88 1.31 1.21 0.65 3.62 1.25 1.13 0.63 3.40 1.20 1.07 0.60 3.20 1.16 1.02 0.58 3.05 1.12 0.98 0.56 2.93 1.10 0.95 0.55 2.85 1.09 0.94 0.55 2.81 1.10 0.94 0.55 2.81 1.12 0.95 0.56 2.86 1.14 0.98 0.57 2.94B 1.52 1.47 0.76 4.40 1.41 1.35 0.71 4.05 1.33 1.24 0.66 3.73 1.25 1.14 0.63 3.43 1.19 1.05 0.59 3.16 1.12 0.97 0.56 2.92 1.07 0.91 0.53 2.72 1.02 0.85 0.51 2.55 0.98 0.81 0.49 2.42 0.96 0.78 0.48 2.34 0.95 0.77 0.48 2.30 0.96 0.77 0.48 2.30 0.97 0.78 0.48 2.35 0.99 0.81 0.50 2.44C 1.42 1.34 0.71 4.01 1.32 1.22 0.66 3.65 1.23 1.10 0.61 3.31 1.14 1.00 0.57 3.00 1.06 0.90 0.53 2.71 0.99 0.82 0.50 2.46 0.94 0.75 0.47 2.24 0.89 0.69 0.44 2.06 0.85 0.64 0.42 1.93 0.82 0.61 0.41 1.83 0.81 0.60 0.41 1.79 0.81 0.60 0.41 1.79 0.83 0.61 0.41 1.84 0.85 0.65 0.43 1.94D 1.32 1.21 0.66 3.64 1.22 1.09 0.61 3.26 1.12 0.97 0.56 2.91 1.03 0.86 0.51 2.58 0.94 0.76 0.47 2.27 0.87 0.67 0.44 2.00 0.81 0.59 0.40 1.77 0.75 0.53 0.38 1.58 0.71 0.48 0.36 1.43 0.69 0.44 0.34 1.33 0.67 0.43 0.34 1.29 0.67 0.43 0.34 1.29 0.69 0.45 0.35 1.35 0.72 0.48 0.36 1.45E 1.22 1.10 0.61 3.29 1.11 0.96 0.56 2.89 1.01 0.84 0.51 2.52 0.92 0.72 0.46 2.17 0.83 0.62 0.41 1.85 0.75 0.52 0.37 1.56 0.68 0.44 0.34 1.31 0.62 0.37 0.31 1.11 0.58 0.32 0.29 0.96 0.55 0.28 0.28 0.89 0.54 0.26 0.27 0.86 0.54 0.26 0.27 0.85 0.56 0.28 0.28 0.90 0.59 0.32 0.29 0.97
11 12 13 146 7 8 9 101 2 3 4 5
LIST OF COMPONENTS
A
B
C
D
E
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
d
x 2
x 70x 70
d
l
L
d
D
D x 3.14
2”
1”
C2
LIST OF COMPONENT DIMENSIONSC1
ASSEMBLY DIAGRAM
Assignment 9C/
TECHNICAL DRAWINGS
Ian McGee
Mateo Rodriguez
Jesse Siegle
Dhruv Soni
12/05/2016
Notes/
Page 7/7
A1Scale 1:24
DO
CU
ME
NTS
FO
R C
ON
STR
UC
TIO
N
IAN MCGEE 36
MODEL
DO
CU
ME
NTS
FO
R C
ON
STR
UC
TIO
N
IAN MCGEE 36
MODEL
