![Page 1: Guru Group Meeting 7 July 14 - The Engage With What Challenge - Paul Sparrow](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032514/55d52007bb61eb85578b46c4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Professor Paul Sparrow Centre for
Performance-led HR
The Engage With What Challenge
EfS Guru Group
![Page 2: Guru Group Meeting 7 July 14 - The Engage With What Challenge - Paul Sparrow](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032514/55d52007bb61eb85578b46c4/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Introduction: A Slide A Minute
• Engagement debate is at a critical juncture – more nuanced but also more polarised debate
• “I want to testify” problem – each have to lay cards on the table on how we view and define engagement…are you in my gang? NOT GOING TO REPLAY ACADEMIC CRITIQUES OF SCALES ETC
• For me, engagement IF used as an umbrella concept to capture a range of social processes has value – mainly in legitimising and gaining entry for HR to a range of issues.. two sided deal at work, centrality of employee behaviour to many performance outcomes, the need for trust, fairness etc
• But hard questions, need to tone down some performance claims, and be more insightful in others
![Page 3: Guru Group Meeting 7 July 14 - The Engage With What Challenge - Paul Sparrow](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032514/55d52007bb61eb85578b46c4/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
1 Trust me, I’m an HR Business Partner!
Systematic Review
• Critical and comprehensive synthesis, selection and appraisal of the best available research
• 48623 articles in January 2010, reduced to 646 studies in practitioner and academic journals from 1970-2010 – abstracts reviewed
• Majority present survey results/advice/viewpoint of HR experts• Only 81 evidence-base studies, only 35 of these based on any reasonable
measurement of impacts• Down to 11 studies that test it under controlled conditions• Based on two popular tools, UWES by Schaufeli et al. (2002) and the Q12
by Gallup
![Page 4: Guru Group Meeting 7 July 14 - The Engage With What Challenge - Paul Sparrow](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032514/55d52007bb61eb85578b46c4/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
2 Umbrella Concept For A Range Of Antecedents, Bonds, Consequences (2010)
If going to measure, need a medical diagnosis model
![Page 5: Guru Group Meeting 7 July 14 - The Engage With What Challenge - Paul Sparrow](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032514/55d52007bb61eb85578b46c4/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
3. What Academics Fail To Say…The Kaleidoscope Problem
Inputs become Outcomes, Outcomes become inputs, only higher-level constructs - eg. justice, voice, trust – have utility?
![Page 6: Guru Group Meeting 7 July 14 - The Engage With What Challenge - Paul Sparrow](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032514/55d52007bb61eb85578b46c4/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
4. Move a Step back: Measure the Performance belief
• To make the construct of “engagement” more applied we need to move a step back and establish a construct that “causes” employees to be engaged.
• Engagement should be treated simply as an outcome that follows from relevant prior beliefs. Direct your measurement at the “Performance Belief”:
• “a shared belief of a team that it has the required ability, resources, goal clarity and leadership attributes to achieve the desired performance outcomes.”
• Performance Belief is the cause, being Engaged to Perform might be one of the effects • As a strategic function, HR should be most concerned about how it gets employees to
believe in the vision of performance the organization offers. • In shifting attention to how “engagement” is managed, it becomes clear that what you
measure also has to change!
![Page 7: Guru Group Meeting 7 July 14 - The Engage With What Challenge - Paul Sparrow](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032514/55d52007bb61eb85578b46c4/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
5. Engagement for what? Does the technology export across sectors?
Engagement as Internal Marketing, employee advocacy
Engagement as healthy
deal at work - Process
Improvement
Engagement as predictive of Service
and Organizational Performance
![Page 8: Guru Group Meeting 7 July 14 - The Engage With What Challenge - Paul Sparrow](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032514/55d52007bb61eb85578b46c4/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
6. So, I Want To Testify
• Engagement – Performance: Can show some “linkage” between “engagement” and bottom-line measures of performance – but reverse causation via proximate, intermediate & distal outcomes
• If start with the desired end performance, would not automatically always point to engagement as starting point: complex recipes needed to create organizational performance and engagement
• Engagement can be managed at individual level, but in many performance contexts engagement only really works at a collective level, and interventions that turn on an individual not the same as the ones that create a sense of collective belief
![Page 9: Guru Group Meeting 7 July 14 - The Engage With What Challenge - Paul Sparrow](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032514/55d52007bb61eb85578b46c4/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
7. Engagement predicts performance, but is complex…Don’t devalue the currency
• Sometimes being in a good performing unit makes you engaged, not the other way round. Reverse causation
• Sometimes performance effects only kick in at extreme levels of engagement
• Sometimes engagement works through intermediate outcomes• Sometimes engagement only works when it creates a collective capability• Employee Segments: Different types of employee respond differently to
the same conditions• Engagement levels co-vary with lots of other things: relatively new to the
organisation, young, gender, hours of work and pay patterns, country they work in, work for a core or a more peripheral organisational unit etc
![Page 10: Guru Group Meeting 7 July 14 - The Engage With What Challenge - Paul Sparrow](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032514/55d52007bb61eb85578b46c4/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
8. Performance recipe for InnovationWhither engagement?
• WHAT TYPE OF INNOVATION: From research, through impact, regional impact, teaching delivery, teaching markets
• Structural and incentive system development • Expansion of management skills • Competence destruction and reconfiguration of career systems • Understanding skill formation strategies and long-term organisational
capability • Subsequent HR solutions around selection, team management,
leadership etc
![Page 11: Guru Group Meeting 7 July 14 - The Engage With What Challenge - Paul Sparrow](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032514/55d52007bb61eb85578b46c4/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
9. Or Service-profit chain thinking:Whither engagement ?
Complex service models that bring together a range performance factors:
Internal service qualityCustomer expectationsOrganizational image
Brand propositionPerceived product or service quality
External service valueCustomer satisfaction
Customer loyaltyCustomer advocacy
Service models embedded within a firm’s organizational capabilities and business approach
![Page 12: Guru Group Meeting 7 July 14 - The Engage With What Challenge - Paul Sparrow](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032514/55d52007bb61eb85578b46c4/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
![Page 13: Guru Group Meeting 7 July 14 - The Engage With What Challenge - Paul Sparrow](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032514/55d52007bb61eb85578b46c4/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
![Page 14: Guru Group Meeting 7 July 14 - The Engage With What Challenge - Paul Sparrow](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032514/55d52007bb61eb85578b46c4/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
12. It’s Engagement, But Not As We Know It…
![Page 15: Guru Group Meeting 7 July 14 - The Engage With What Challenge - Paul Sparrow](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032514/55d52007bb61eb85578b46c4/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
The Power of Good Data
![Page 16: Guru Group Meeting 7 July 14 - The Engage With What Challenge - Paul Sparrow](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032514/55d52007bb61eb85578b46c4/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
![Page 17: Guru Group Meeting 7 July 14 - The Engage With What Challenge - Paul Sparrow](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032514/55d52007bb61eb85578b46c4/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
15. Anyway, We Are Redefining the Contours of Fairness?
• Questions of fairness more complex• Redistributing costs and responsibilities
between between markets, states, organisations and individuals
• Many issues (eg. pension provision, questions of reward, careers across different age groups, global sourcing of work, social mobility etc)
• They have impacts across generational groups and across different internal employee segments
![Page 18: Guru Group Meeting 7 July 14 - The Engage With What Challenge - Paul Sparrow](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032514/55d52007bb61eb85578b46c4/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
16. Conclusions for the way the engagement debate might develop
• Use a basket of antecedents, bonds, conditions – include work engagement if you wish ! – it is a “linguistic device”
• Return engagement analysis to where it belongs – as part of strategic workforce planning – looking at the collective aspects of engagement
• Analyse the different performance recipes – very likely unique to firms let alone sectors
• Move away from over-egging the engagement scales – different attitudes predict different performance outcomes
• Engage not because we must but because we should…
![Page 19: Guru Group Meeting 7 July 14 - The Engage With What Challenge - Paul Sparrow](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032514/55d52007bb61eb85578b46c4/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Time to move on, ask the tougher questions, clear
out the rubbish, but not get too hung up on debating
our navel
Thank You!