DOtOMENT BESUIE
ED 124 749 95 CE 007 365
_AgFHCE;.
Tannpr, Kinsey i
TITLE Professdional Development Series for Work rIxpeLiienceEducation. Final Report.. A
INSTITUTION California Polytechnic State Univ., San LujsObispo.
SPONS AGENCY Office of Education (DHEW), Washington, D.Q.WORT NO- VT-102-876BUREAU NO 40-30569 B-3-230; -40-30569 EFO 39-73 .
PUB DATE 73NOTE 97p.
EDRS PRICE MF-$0.83'HC-$4.67 Plus Postage.DESCRIPTORS *Career Education; Course Descriptions; Graduate
Study; Higher Education; *Inservice C6urses;*Insetvice Teacher Education; Part;cipant _
Satisfaction; *Program EYaluaition; Uhd.her:-Improvement; -*Work Experience;' Workshops .4.
f4-....
% I.*;.
\ABSTRACTThe report summarizes a.project for conducting a
series of workshops and graduate level extension courses on workexperience education at various California locations. The purpose ofthe series was to increase the effectiveness of teaching fordisadvantaged and handicapped, update occupational coapetPncies,update administrative and supervisory skills, and'orientr.onvocational education personnel-to vocational education. A total of556 educators participated in the project, with 13? enrolled inworkshops, 210 in a fall series of courses, and 208 in a springseries. itpsults of a questipnnaire administered to participantsindicated a high degree of &cceptancd of the course. Presented in thereport are the project, director's summary, objectives, plannedparticipant selectich, and partidipant selection report. Appendix -escomprise the main body of the report, and, contain the following:geographical report cn participants, participant data summary form,the'project evaluatioti reports and subjective project evaluationreports for both the fall and spring series of courses, three:quarterly project report's (from July, 1972 to March, 1973), andresults of the subjective questionnaire ratings by'class. (RG)
**************#****:***************A************************************* ,Documents acquired by ERIC include many, informal unpublished* materials nct available from other sources. ERIC.makes every effort** to obtain the best copy available. Nevertheless, items of marginal *
* reproducibility are often encOuntered and this affects the quality *
* of the nicr'efiche and hardcopy reproductions ERIC makes available *
* via the ERIC Document Reproductibn Service (ED1kS). EDRS is not r=5 *
.* responsible for the quality of the original documeht. Reproductions ** suppliedby EDRS are the best that can be made from. the original.******************4*********************************t**********v*******
e.
APRs FESSIbNALDEVELOPMENTSERIES
ORWORK EXPERIENCE EDUCATION
rd
CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY
FINAL. REPORT 'JUNE -1978'
PREPARED BY:KINSEY TANNERPROJECT DIRECTOR
US °EPA, TIMENT OF HEALTH.EDUCATION WELFARENAT:ONAL INSTITUTE OF
EDUCATION"
TINS DOCUMENT HAS SEEN REPRO.DUCE° EXACTLY AS RECEnToFRomTHE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGIN.ATING IT POINTS OF VIEal OR OPINIONSSTATED 00 NOT NECESSARILY REPRE-SENT ocriciAL NATIONAL INSTITUTE OFEDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY
SAN LUIS OBliP0, CALIFORNIA 934076
. .
FINAL REPORT.
July 1, 1972 June 30, .1973
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT SERIES FOR WORK EXPERIENCEEPUCATION
Project #40-30569 EF0 39-73
An Education Professions Development Act Project.
AIM
0
41
and
Project #40-30569 B-3-230
A Vocational Education Section Part B Project
California Polytechnic State University
San Luis Obispo, California
Kinsey Tanner, Director
0.Distributed to:
Dr. James BecketE. David .Graf
Allan HolmesDr. Dale AndrewsDr, Howard BotoughsDr. Carl CumminsDr..Walter SchroederDr. Don MoritsRobert PooleTony Thele
v T V?
Tr
CONTENTS
. PROJECT DIRECTORS SUMMARY
II. OBJECTIVES AS STATED IN THE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT SERIESFOR WORK EXPErENCE EDUCATION
/III. PLANNED PARTICIPANT SELECTION
IV.
Page
1
2
PARTICIPANT SELECTION REPORT 5.
APPENDICES!
Geog aphical Report on, Participantsti
Partj.cipant Data Summary O.E. Form 7214
Project Evaluation Report - Fall, Series
S f,
b tine Project
Project Evaluation
SulI ective Project
QUarterly
Quirterly
Quarterly
'Subjective1
C
Evaluation Report - Fall Series
Report Spring Series .. ..... .
Evaluation Report - Spring. Series
Report - 7/1/72 to 9/30/72
Report=h7lr72-to 12/31/72;),
Report -'1/1/7i to 3/30/73
Ratings by Class,Questionnaire
I
1
I
I. PROJECT DIRECTORS SUMMARY '
0
Both the.stated objectives and time schedule for the project havebeen
met. All factors considered in evaluation indicate the spring quarterseries of classes was very successful. Both evaluation reports for the
spring series (Appendices E and F) show a high degree of acceptance bythe participants on the subjective questionnaire and an excellent grow7th
rate as indicated by pre- and post-test scores. (Fall series report as
Appendices C and D.) The total number of participants was 556. 'Whilethis is smaller than anticipated, the high percentage of the participantswho were .involved directly in Work Experience Education or other Vocational
Education programs more than make up for being slightly under the estimate
in the project. Perhaps most indicative was tfie response to the subjective
question, "Would you be interested in participating in future in-servicetraining programs of this type?" In the fall series 86 replied "yes"
while six answered."no." In the spring series 104 replied "yes" while six
replied "no." This indicates an extremely high degree of acceptance bythe participants and indicates excelent'teaphing on the part of theinstructors.
In addition to the POject Director, evaluation of the project war conductedby two project evaluatqls. Mr. Robert Poole of Los Altos, California, wasresponsible for development of pre- and post-tests for each course and
monitoring each of the classes in Northern California and reporting the
results. 1.1;6 Poole is retired coordiriatorof Work Experience Education ofSequoia Union High School District, and former ponsultant,,Work ExpeiienceEducation, State Department of Education. In addition helve past pres-ident of the California Association of Work Experience Educators and wasa California Association of Work, Experience Educators executive secretary.
Mr;Tony Thele of Torrance, California,was responsible for developing andadministering-a subjective,questionnaire, and compiling results. He was
responsible for monitoring classes held in Southern California. Mr. Thele
was coordinator of Work Experience Education in the Hanford Union HighSchool Dist -riot- former-Director of the Professional Development Seriesfor Work Experience Education, and is Director of Work aperience Education
and Placemdnt at El Camino College in Torrance.
Each class was observed during the operation by the evaluators and/or theDirector and a class visitation report was filed.
I would call attention, to question #1 on the subjective questionnaire forfall and spring quarter classes (Appendices D and F) which relates to-changes participant-6 plan to make tn their programs as a result of parti-
cipating in the Professional Development Series for Work Experience Educa-
tion. It would appear from these statements that the EPDA Series relatedvery strongly to the State Priorities of Vocational Education: (A) Increasing
effectiveness of teachini, for disadvantaged and handicapped; (B) Updating
of occupational competencies; (C) Updating administrative, and supervisoryskills; and) Orienting-non-VocAtional Education personnel to Vocational
Education. In the fall quarter classes_45% of the participants statedthat they had direct responsibility for disadvantaged and 23% statedresponsibility foT handicapped. During the spring quarter classes 54%indicated they had responsibility for disadvantaged and 337. had responsibility
for handicapped.
1
I. PROJECT DIRECTORS SUMMARY - (continued) rt
Broad geographical representation was obtained as evidenced in the geogra-phical analysis reported in Appendix A. 4
* 'As indicated in the fall evaluation report 87. of those enrolled' were admin-
,,istrators of Vocational Education programs. -In the spring series 77. reported
they were administratofs of Vocational Education programs.
All the courses contained information on Career Education: with emphasis cAnthe place of,Work Experience Education in Career Education.
The majority of the respondents indicated they would be making changes intheir program as a result of taking the course offered through theProfessional Development Series for Work Expaqence.Educatioh.
The 'quarterly reports for the series are also included as Appendices G, H,
and I.
Outstanding assistance has been given by California Polytechnic StateUniversity personnel, especially Dr.. Walter Schroeder, Head, EducationDepartment, and the faEulty and staff of the Education Department. Theservice of Den Morris and the Office of Continuing. Education have been
of tremendous-help during, thegntire yearyas has been the cooperation andperformance ,of the California Polytechnic State University Foundation officersand staff.
The staffs of the State Department of Educationand Regional Offices havecooperated to the kUllest in the operation of the project through the year.Aspecial mention should be given to Allan Holrdes, State Consultant, WorkExperience Education.
RespeCtfully submitted,
Kinsey Tanner, DirectorTeacher Education',
Work Experience EducationCalifornia Polytechnic State UniversityJune 29, 1973
II- OBJECTIVES AS STATED IN THE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT SERIES FOR WORK,EXPERIENCE EDUCATION
N4
1. The description of objectives of the project as stated in the contractare as follows:
1.1 {Conduct a summer Workshop designed to familiarize edUcators withconcepts. of Career Education and their relationships with WorkExperience Education. '
1.2' Conduct a summer workshop designed to familiarize Work ExperienceEducation personnel with materials and methods for conductingreated' intruction classes.
1.3 Trlin eight instructors who will present to participants of themanagement courses, the strong philosophical' and educational reasonswhy goals.and objectives are needed for Work Experience Education
P.)
2
-r
T
'.II. OBJECTIVES AS STATED IN THE PROFESSIAIAL DEVELOPMENT SERIES POR WORK
EXPERUNCE EDUCATION
r'
1.4 Conduct'instructOr training woikihops to train teachers of the
courses the concepts of 'Career Education. - ,
1.5 Present ten (10) graduate level extension courses (five in theMlLand five in the spring) entitled "Work Experience Education -ImplementatiOe and "Work; Experience Education - Operational."These coursesto be offered,in five locationq throughout the
state. The 250students attending will earn 23/4 quarter Units of
graduate credit'for each class. (Twenty-five hours of instruction
per class.) .
1.6 Present eleven (11) graduateevel extensfon courses (five in tiefall and six in the'spring) entitled, "Work Experience Edudationr-Management" at eleven different locations for 300 participants.'
1- Participants will be selected from those who have previouslyattended the beginning courses and/or are responsible for admin-
istrative.functions. Participants will receive three quart@r
'units of credit. (Thirty hours of instruction.)
1.7 Present three (3) graduate level extension courses (one in thefall and tw We spring) entitled "Work Experience Education -
194In the Co nity College." These courses will be offered in
three locations throughout the state. The 75 patticipants selectedto Attend will earn three quarter units of graduate credit:
(Thirty hours of instruction.)
1.8 . Provide in all four courses a unit(s) in Career Education conceptsas they relate to Work Experience Education and to state andnational priority.
. The coursed offered are as follows:
Ed-E-581-05 - Work Exper ience Education-- Implementation; for firstand second, year -Work Experience EduCation coordinator; types of WorkExperience _Education -programs and-methods-of implementing a-Weitk-Experience Education program as a part of-the total curricul4m (no
prerequisite).t
Ed-E-581-06 - Work Experience Education -,Operation;, given in springto follow Ed-E-581 -05; labor codes, funding, public relations, related
instruction, education and adanistrative codes (prerequisite Ed-E-544or Ed-E-581-05-ort permission of instructor).
Ed-E-581-07 - Work Experience Education, - Management; fin. experienc ed
Work Experience Education coordinators and administrators; accountability,financing and management theories for Work Experience Education.
Ed-E-581-08 Work Experience Education - Community College; for WorkExperience Education coordinators and eooperative education-teachers atcommunity colleges; development and operation procedures for WorkExperience Education programs in the community colleges; accountability,education and administrative codes,.,State Plan for Vocational Education
in the commutity colleges.
3
fp
0
,
0 _ II'. OBJECTIVES AS STATED IN THE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT SERIES FORWORKEXPERIENCE EDUCATI6N - (continued)
C S - ,
I I .. 3. The"time schedule for objectives of the.
project as stated in the.contract
are is f3ilowS..
3
4r
. :
1
1. Summer workshop (care Education) 6/26-30103
2. Planning meeting 7/15 -16
3. 'Summer workshop (Materials for Relaeed Instruction) 8/21-24
4. Extension course teacher planning session (1.7-.7) . 8/21-24-,5. Extension course teacher planning session . .8/21-24
- 6. Extension course teacher planning session (1.7-0_-,. . 8/28-30
7. Selection of participants ..17: 9/1=1
8. Courses to be offered (one night per week -8 weeks1.7-5)
9. Courses to be offered (one, night per week -ro weeks
10/2 -12/1
1.7-6, .1.7-7) t10/2-12/14
10. Planning and evaluation meeting (1.7-5) 12/911. Planning and evaluation meeting (1.7 -6), 1/6/73
12. _Planning and evaluation meeting (17-7) 1/13
13. Courses to be offered One night per week weeks.
1.7-5) : - r 2/12-4413
14. Courses to be offered (one-night per week -10 weeks1.7-6, 1.7-7)% 2/12-4/26
15. Evaluation meeting- with course 'intructors (I-7-5). . 4/2816. Evaluation meeting With course instructors (1.7-6). . 5/517. Evaluation meeting.with course instructors (1.1-7). 5/1218,. Evaluation report 1 5/28
III. PLANNED PARTICIPANT SELECTION
-.. - . 1-
1. The criteria for selection and the type of participants as_stated .in. ..theproject are as- "follows:
Participants will be selected frowthose educators that have demonstrated. knowledge and/or interest in Work Experience Education. Seletion of
teacher-trainers 'sill be conducted by the Project Director with assis-tance from the California State Consultant for Work. Experience Education4and the Head of the Education Department, California Polytechnic StateUniversity.
Those who will attend the in-service training programs will be selectedby county and school directors of Vocational Education, in the immediatearea being served by these courses.
745 persons will participate in the project. Participation will be as
follows:
1, 1'20 educators will attend%the slimmer workshopsat Cal.Poly, San -LuisObispo.
2. 250 new coordinators will be selected to attend the.in-serviceimplementatiOn and operational courses to be offered in Indio,Poffiona, Stockton, San Diego' and Los Angeies.
3. )00 coordinators, Vocational Education adMinistrators, counselors,
4
IIIt
I/ .0-
S pecial emphasis will be given to the selection of participants in
continuation education and special ; cation.. . .
,.
IV, PARTICIPANT SELECTION REPORT- .
. .
.
1. Total participants number 556. includedncruded 138 who enrolled in .
workshops as rep yted in the fall report. The fall series of courses
IIenrolled 210 iduditors. Participanes.enrolled in the spring seriesof courses numbered um.
__--
III. PLANNED PARTICIPANT SELECTION - (continued)
*. ..... I ,-
. . . . .. u
etc., will be selected to attend the in-service management courseoIfered in FresnoModesto, Sacramento,.Los Angeles, San Mateo, .
Marin County,Redding, San Diego, Long Beach, San Luis Obispo, andr . .
Salinas. 4 .
4. 75-community college coordinators and vocational personnel will beselected to attend the ia-service commtnity college course offered
. in San Mateo, Huntington Beach and Pa'sadena. .
.
e
1
Fall courses were.offered in the} following locations:
"Work Experience Education - Implenientation"
Ed -E- 581 -05 Enrollment 0
Indio 8
Selma. , OOOOOO 19
Los Angeles 11
'San Francisco 16
Sacramento
Total ° 70
"Work Experience Education - Management"Ed -E- 581 -07 Enrollment_,________
.Cupertino 16
Lafayette 11
Modesto 38
Salinas, 24West Covina lz
* Ventura 19
Total 1120
../
"Work Experience Education - Commihity College"Ed-E-581-08 Enrollment
Los Altos 11 -
Whittier 9
p.Total 20
0,
C.
* Course started" 11/1/72 and was completed 1/10/73
5
94'
_r
IV. PARTICIPANT SELECTION'REPORT - (Continued
, . .4
Spring courses were offered in the following.ldcations:
J
C
' "Work Experience Education - Operation"Enrollment Ed-E- 581 -06
.
1914
16
20
.
- Indio -,
SellaLos AngelesSan Francisco
.
Sacramento
'
, .
-Total/
.
.
77
, ,
"Work Experience FAucation 7 Management"Ed-E-581-07 Enrollment
%-''. t
. Torrance es 151
San Diego . . . 33
1-,Sacramento '13
San Francisco. 24
. 'Redding '20
** FresnO. :','N. 14
Total 120.
oe
"Work Experience Education Community College"
Ed-E-581-08 Enrollment
Hayward 12
0
,Total 12' ,
. ,
Many of the participants had:Part7time responsibilities in Work ExpeienCeEducation and otherVocational Education areas, therefore the percentages
reported total more than 100%. , . . ..
- The fall quarter class analysis by position was:
c;4,Jr Experience Education 6, Implementation"
67% were directly involved WithlWork Experience'Education37% were directly involved in Vocational-Education33% hope to move into Work ExperiencelEducation-
. .
"Work Experience Education - Management"
66% were directly,involved with Work Experience Education45% were directly involv9din Vocational Educition130% hope to moveinto-Work kxperience Education'
** Course started 3/6/73 (and was 'completed 5/8/73
6.
10
a
0
i
".4 K
IV. PARTICIPANT SELECTION REPORT '-.(contiRued).
, "Work Experience Education - Community College".
927. weredirectly.involved in Work Experien6e Education'35% were directly involved in Vocational Education, .,
t
d
The Spring quarter class analysis by position was:.
"Woik-ExperienceEducation Operation"
48% were directly involved with Wok Experienc e Education-667. were involved in Vocational Education as'teachets or
adminf.sttatorS. 19% hope to move into' Work Experienc e Education'
"Work Experience Education - -Management"
'30% were directly involved with WotkExperience Education657. were involved in Vocational Education asteachers.or
administrators.187. hope to move into.Wdr Experience Education
"Work Experience E ducation Community College",
637.. were directly involved with Work.gxperience Education55% were involved in Vocational Educatidp as teachers or
administrators.
'2,Q% of the participants were teachers or administrators in disciplines
11
other than Vocational 'Education.0
-
.
I.
.
0 -
I
.I
11
, .
LOCATION
INDIO.
0
A
'APPENDIX A.
.
GEOGRAPHICAL BREAKDOWN
FALL 1972-73 '
"woillExakris.ence Education - fmplementation"
tz.
-/Ed-E-581-05
Indio. . 3
Rialto 1
Cailexico .2
EY Centro 1
La Qtfiata 1
SEEM
Fresno 9
Dinuba 2
Lemoore 1
Hanford' 1
Corcoran 1
Riverdale 1
Visalia 1
Tulare ' 2
LOS ANGELES
Los Angeles 5
Arcadia 1
Inglewood 1
Long Beach 1
. Moptebello . . . 1 asSan GabrielCarson
1
f.
LOCATION
. .
ENROLLED
SAN FRANCISCO./
San 'FranEiaco
MillbraePenngiove .
''..
5,
1
. 1
Pleasanton 1
Lafayette. .... . . iSan Rafael 1
Livermore. . 4 , 1
San Leandro 1
Richmond 1
Healdsburg . , . eSanta Rosa 1
Belmont. , 1
SACRAMENTO'
Sacramento ' 4
City Heights , . 1
Carmichael 1
Lodi 2
Elk Grove 2 °
Penryn.
1 1
Lincoln 2
Woodland 1 .
Dixon 1
t.
"
.
, APPENDIX A -.
GEOGRAPHICAL BREAKDOWN.
...,
. -
0
FALL 1972-73
"Work Experience Education - Management"
LOCATION
Ed-E-581-07,
\\0CATION. # ENROLLED# ENROLLED
WEST COVINA
_Duarte
Colton. .
FullertonCovina
0
1
1"2
1.
- MODESTO
ModestoRipon
TracyOakdale
24
1
2
- 1
Laverne . ..... .'1 tis Denair. . . .1,
South Flaadeni. .Ceres 2
:San Dimas .... 1 Sonora
Orange .1 Tdrlock 1
West_Covina . . Manteca 1
Whittier.. . m60. . . . 1 Lds Banos 1
Glendora '1 Livingston 1
1'
.1..AFKVETTE VENTURA
Tairfield 3 Ventura 7
Alamo 1 Oxnard 1
Pleasant Hill . . . . I Oak View 1
Walnut Creek 1 Carpinteria 1
Vallejo 1 Santa Paula. 4
Napa ,
walnut Creek
1
1
Port Hueneme'Fillmore
1
1
Lafayette 1 Northridge 1
Antioch . . 1 Camarillo 2
..z
CUPERTINO
NewarkSanta Clara . . 1
San JoseSunnyvale 1
Palo Alto 1
San Mateo 1
Redwood City 1
.143
4.
(CONTINUED)
APPENDIX A
GEOGRAPHICAL BREAKDOWN
FALL 1972-73
"Work Experience Education - Management"
Ed-E-581-07
LOCATION
SALINAS
# ENROLLED, .
Salinas . . 17
Santa Cruz 2
Monterey. . 1
San Mai-tin
Oakland 1
Gonzales 1Ben Lomond
1 4
1
.LOCATION
APPENDIX A
GEOGRAPHICAL BREAKDOWN
- FALL 1972-73
"Work Experience Education - Community College"
# ENROLLED
Ed -E- 581 -08
4.LOCATION 4 ENROLLED'
.LOS;ALTOS WHITTIER
San J6se 5
Los Gatos. 1
Saratoga 2
Sunnyvale 1
Foster Cit ,1
4g.
15
Walnut 1
WhittierAlhambraAlta LomaTorrance.Fullerton'la'Habra
.
2
1
1
1
APPENDIX A
GEOGRAPHICAL pRiAKDOWN
SPRING ,1972-73
"Work Experience Education --Operation"
Ed-E-581-06
LOCATION # ENROLLED . LOCATION # ENROLLED
INDIO SAN FRANCISCO
Calexico 2 Concord 3
Indio ... 6 Daly City 1
Lafayette 1
Livermore 1
SELMA Oakland 1
Pittsburg 1
Clovis 1 San Francisco . . . . '1
Fresno 11 San Leandro 1
Hanford 1 San Mateo .1
Latbn 1 Santa Rosa 1
Leriloore "1 Stockton 1
Reedley 1 Walnut Creek 1
Tulare. " . 2
SACRAMENTO
LOS ANGELES;Carmichael 3
Arcadia 1 City Heights .. 1
Camarillo 1 Dixon I
Hermosa Beach . . . 1 Fresno 1
Long Beach . 1. .
Lincoln 1
Montebello 1 1 , - Lodi 2
Rosemead, 1 Modesto .. . ,.. .. 1
San Gabriel 1 Orangevale 1
Sunland 1 Sacramento. . , . 7
Via Torrance 1)
Sutter Creek 1
LoS Angeles 5 Woodland 1
'16
APPENDIX A
GEOGRAPHICAL BREAKDOWN
SPRING 1971-71
"Work Experience Education - Management"
Ed-E-581-07
LOCATION # ENROLLED
I-
LOCATION # ENROLLED
FRESNO
CaruthersChowchillaCoalingaFrt.sno
1
1
1
2
1
REDDING
_AndersonButte city.
CottonwoodDunsmuirHayfork
3
1
1
3
-
M a d e r a. . . . . .. . . 1 Lewiston I .
Modesto . . 4 Millville. ..Sanger. . - . . 1 ' Redding; 8
Tulare 1 Weavervillev4. , . 1
Visalia 1
SAN FRANCISCOSACRAMENTO
Alameda 1Davis, 1 Concord 1
Galt 1 Corte Madera` 1
Redding Kentfield. . . . 1
Sacramento 9 OaklandWoodland 1 Penngroye 1
Petuluma 1
Pleasanton, 1
SAN DIEGO San'Iranctsco 5
Fremont 1
Calexico 1 Alamo i 1
La Mesa 3 San Mateo 1
ElCajon . 2 Walnut Creek 1
Escondido 2 Woodside ' 1
Coronado 1 South San Francisco. . 1
La Jolla 1 San Leandro 1
Vista . . - 1 San Anselmo 1
San Diego 19 Berkeley 1
Chula Vita 2' San Rafael 1
].7
t
N
LOCATION
APPENDIX A
GEOGRAPHICAL BREAKDOWN
SPRING 1972-71
"WorkExperience Education - Management"'
Ed-.1-41417,
# ENROLLED
TORRANCE
Camarillot, El Segundo"
1
I ,
4
ti
,'.Huntington Beach. . . . 2_
Los Alamitos 1
Long Beach 1Reseda ,
1
: Santa Monica ' 1
San Pedro . .. . .. . -2,,
Torrance':: 3 .
Via Torrance... .
tiAfina Del Rey 1
ti
18
1
1
1
1
-LOCATION
APPENDIX A
GEOGRAPHICAL BREAKDOWN-
SPRING 1972-73
"Work Experience Education - Community College"
Ed-E-581-08
# ENROLLED
HAYWARD
Berkeley 1
Concord 14
Mont 1
Hayward 1
OaklancE 3
Pleasant Hill 1.
Redwood City 1
San Mateo 1
Walnut Creek 1
\
19
r
, 0
1
, 111
IR.-GEOGRAPHIC
APPENDIX B
DIPARTNEINT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION. AND WELFAREOFFICE OF EDUCATION
WASNINSTON. O.C. tlitu
PARTICIPANT DATA RIMMARY(Puts C, D, Ealucethus Pmfeisiees NvolopewmfAct
Title V. P.L.11632P, es Gaosseslett)
SUOGETPOUREAU NO. 111107S2APPROVAL. EXANES: 10/11/71
s. GE *RoJEcr NOISIER
a NAME OF SPONSORING INSTITUTION OR AGENCY
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis ObispoS. STATE
California4. a. NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS TONE TRAINED IN THE
PROJECTh. NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS COVERED BY THIS SUMMARY
REPORT413
4
4*,
;
DATA ON
S. SEX 41 AGE.111
i Ws. 587. PARTICIPANTS BY WHETHER OR
NOT.THEY ARE VIETNAM ERAVETERANSa. under.25 13 4. 35-3. 75I - .. ..
a. Mals 302 h. 25-21 52 a.-4044 - 63' 4. SSSt 28 . ViOMM1t we vett/revs 32.b. retnal 102 c, 30-34 66 o. 4 5 4 1 58 1: 110 and .vi. 9 b. Not Viittnant ere veterans' 286_
.S. RACIAL OR ETHNIC AACKGROUND N. PARTICIPANTS BY WHETHER THEIR INCOMES ARE, OR
WERE BEFORE THEY ENROLLED IN THILPROJECT.BELOW THE POVERTY LINE.
_fa..Nsgro r bl..k 34 d. American Indian 414 timid, Wien 0. rt. ,Ovisettal 6, Is. II:lw wroth; fins' '9-s. lisiesn.Anialeavt 12 f. Other then the above 343 h. Nfbelvs wrath" fine 378
1
DISTRIBUTION OF PARTICIPANTS (by Jiato el somplymont prim I. Ala proMet),
a. Al-. b _ k. Gs. 0 v. Md. 1 ww N. J. 4 GIA c. 0 ay. Wm,. -
b. Alaska 1 ' 1.-ilimal1 v. Maas. al: N. N. 0 ape S. D. 0 es. Canal Zon4
it. Ads. 0 rn. Idaho 1:. \.... Welt. 0 is. N. Y.
,-..0 sq. Tenn. 0 bos. Guam
.
41. Ark. ""*0 n. Illinois 0 s. Illinii. '_ - she N. C. 0 se. Tomos 0 bb. Puerto Rico
o. Cal.: 390 ..z.cua..- -...Q V. Min. ., ii.14:-D. 0 as. Utah '0 he. VIrginIs
...
f.Ctolo. 0 p. lows 0 s. No. 0 01. Ohio st.-:Ifi: i...-
bd. Pacific Trait. ., Tnitoritra 0S. Onus. 0 K. Kansas 1 sa. Mont 0 , Gk. Okla. j .au. Va.
h. Dal. 0 r. ICY. 0 :k. N.M. ' Q al. Oreg. 0 ay. Wash: 1 belfpterlesia-Dap.
Scheel. V 1Y'I: D.'C. 0 s. La. 2 a.. Nevada 0 wat.-Pa. 0 .w. P. ifs. 0J. -Fla. 0 t. Mains 0 ad. N. H. 0" at. R. I. 0 an. Lee. 0 f. Persian -0
HIGHEST DEGREE EARNED
e. NONE S. R. S. DIPLOMA I e. _ .:.- 'MASTER**
- 0 .J 12 I 214 17/'ED. D.
'2f. PH. D.
, 2
IL OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND.
a. Currently employed (or atthin Om past S Tomeinnloye45 In the flirld of education
-.
407II: Never previously otnplo*d in the field If education
. by whether they were 'JD. Previously employed In the flirld of education, i
but not within the Pilot 3 yltars 41, toriPltiyad In ether ptotoesIs moulting an
academic degree 4 ' 8.. Noeor previously employed In ths thrld at
adoration
.
52. Holding an academie riogres but not "siting 03. Not holding an neadeadc degree 0
IS. TOTAL YEARS OF TEACHING OR OTHER EMPLOYMENT IN THE FIELD OF EDUCATION
a. NONE
6
S. 1-4 YEARS
87c. 14 YEARS
113d. 1014`YEARS
80I. ISO, YEARS
53
t. 20 OR MORE
73
14. PRIMARY POSITION OR EMPLOYMENT STATUS A'T PRESENT, OR IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO PROJECT
ili INA PRESCHOOL. ELEMENTARY OR SECONDARY SCHOOL OR
SCHOOLS. OR 'LOCAL EDUCATION AGENCY
b. OTHERWISE EMPLOYED ,
ItToachst trainer (In Mali-tuition of highor education)
I. Toscani* 271 S. InittnactIonial molls (Neel. librarian")
2. Administrator 5131
6. Idlueatlan aide er pareptefesolona1
7. !di' nluntsor3
' 92. In:Stite educe agency
3. Nareducation position1
3. Supervise!4. Pupil personnel specialist 35 1. Other education position 40 4. Student
OE FOR/A.7214. WO REPLACES OE.PORM 7214. 4/$g, WHICH IS 0SOLETE.
20. 4
DATA ON SCHOOLS OF PARTICIPANTS .
(wort. paistntue M. :oat oJ tM fpfloolog firma (13. U. 17. 111. lfl.. flIo,j9c.,11d. seed 104) ugly the warbor parrleipanee who h... enCiseoolowl in now )4a, by the.watejary M teach How which heat Iteertbae goo nolueo of theiceehewie. Eschew yeenicIpsonte classified in nein Io)
IS. SCHOOL OR SYSTEM,Y CONTROL
111. Gaspe exvtt.s WITH-WHICH THE PARTICIPANTS' ASSIGNMENTS USUALLY RELATE
Proackhol 1 d. Jr. Hisn (7-0) 29 g. Eloa. See. 12a. Public 266
as.
b. - Cr 3 P: wr. W10 (10-12) 2373
A. PilitSce. Vocational 20b. Nonpublic
?"*"1 c. Elea 0(4) 2 f.Seccndery (7-12) 50 1; Adult Education
17. AREA, OF SERVICE og,scHool. OR SYSTEM WHERE EMPLOYED (predaminane choractrielk)
a. Rural or entail town. general population ior :j Urban - poverty area - 44b. Rural or smell town- poverty area 34C. Wirer general population 145
. Suburban
r57
1/1. STUDENT 1100Y OF SCHOOL (ot eckoe/e)IN TERMS OF THE PERCENT WHO COME FROM FAMILIES AT OR ELOW THE POVERTY LINE
... 0% 7 d. 20-211'7. 77 11. SO-39% 21 j. so-107. 2 ,.b. 1-9". 83 .. 30-39% 32 h. 00-497. k. C 100% 14
11. 10-19% 90, .1. 40411% 22 -1. 10-7117. 14
_ , 1
19. STUOEHT 00Y OF SCHOOL(.w schools) IN TERMS OF THE PERCENT WHO COME FROM SPECIFIED MINORITY RACIAL OR ETHNICSACKGROUNOS
. . .
t1A.- NEOR0.01 111.
. , .
S. PUERTO RICANC. MEXICAN-
AMERICAN0. AMERICAN INDIAN E. ORIENTAL
s. 0% 32 I 0% _152 i 0 12 .. 0%78 le. .°1-7.97.
27
b 1- ser. 215 /- 11. Pi% 108 ti: HP% 116 1 b. HI% 210 5 259P 10-197. 60 c. 10 111% 3 C. 10.49 86 ' 10-19% 9 C. 10-197. 39d. 26-297. 24 d. 20.297 2 A. 30-297.-- 7_9 d. 20-297. 3 d. 20-19% 6 -
30-397. 7 e. 70-39% 0 . 30-397 27 .. 3D-3^ - -0- e. 3039% 41. 4049% 8 i . co-49i 0 I. 40-9% ,e I . ,40-9% 0 r 40-497. 3
a- so-.99% 5 i 50-59 0 I 7059% 5 1 SO-S97. 1 1. 50-59% 1
11- 60 69 % 2 h. 60-49% 0 h.. G0-69% b. 110-497.- 0 ' 11-..404507.
.. ... 0ii-. 70-79: 0 1: 7079%
,I. 70-79% 2 r. 70-797 0 1. 70-79% I)
I eIt71197 3 i SO-119". 0 l SOS11% 10 *i S0-11117. 0 i possv. _O
ii' 90:100. 18 k. 9o- 1007. 0_._k. 1101007. 1 1101007. 0 k. 90-1007. ,
AREA OF SPECIALIZATION (If employed In an Institution et Maher 'Amelia)
30. PARTICIPANTS EMPLOYED ,04 INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION. THOSE PARTICIPANTS DISTRIBUTED IN THE FIRST
CATEGORY OF ITEM 14n. AS 'T'EACHER TRAINERS** - BY AREA 003PECiALiZATION
a. ARTS OR criFlut-FS Iw Ent.!,7!":::
96 3
TYPE OF POSITION FOR WHICH PARTICIPANTS ARE PREPARING
21.-ALL PARTICIPANTS Y WHETHER THIS PROJECT IS PREPARING THEM TO ENGAGE IN A DIFFERENT TYPE OF POSITION
N. v. Preparing for cure type of position as at present (es reported in Now 14)C 198
1
b..-skteparitia fur a different type of position (include teacher' who we preparing to fetich. dilletont eubject)
C. Partial( its in category b. above.by type or position being *pared for
88
-_-N..,-.1. Teethe,. (or aNdo(srione subject)
266. Educational aide or persprofesiional,
l'Adrnirustrator 0 7. School volunteerI.
.
i Sig+ervisor 44
,
S. Other educational poSitirin On chool). - 26
Ftrpil pelIonnel specialist.NNN
42
5
4"
9 Teadteettainer On an Inellluflon a highor education)
.
5
..5. Instructional inediaApedtiaist (including librarian
APPENDIX C
INTERIM.PROJEC11 EVALUATION REPORT
. .u
Project ;#40 -30569 -EFO 39-73
An Educational Professional Development Act Project
and'
Project #40 -30569 B-3-M0
A Vocational Education Section part B Project
Prepared By: R. W. Poole - -PrOjett EvaluatorJan. 10, 1973
.--Directed To : Kinsey Tanner.,- Project Director
22
1
I
1
k.
This report containsinformition describing the activities of theProfessional Development Series for Work Experience Education for
the Fall Semester_102.. The Fall program Summary includes:
'1.
1. Activities Related to State' Priorities
2. Actiiiities Related to'Courses offered
3. Selection of Participants
4. Evaluation of PretesU and Post Tests
5. ConclUsions
6. Subjective Evaluation
Activities Related to State Priorities
.0 f
1.1 Increasing Effectivness of Teaching for ,Disadvantaged and
Handlcaped. Forty -five percent of alpartinipants in-
extension courses were direCtly, associated with disadvantage'd
"dents.
awenty-three percent of all participants'in extension courseswere directly associated with handiCapped students.
t
1. 2 Updating Occupational Competencies-
Participants were selected from broad geographical locations
not served by other 'Professional development activities. These
locations were as}iollows:
Sacrarriento, Lafayette, San Francisco, Los Altos, San Jose
Modesto, Selma, Salinas, Ventura, West Covina, Whittie
and Indio.
1. 3 Updating Supervisory Skills , . ,Eightpercent of those enrolled in the courses were administrators
.1
of vocational programs.
. 23
II
2. Activities Related to Courses Offered .
2.1
Page 2
,
Five graduate level extension courses in Work Experience
Education Implementation were offered at:
Location TeacheSiViancisCo Sdvel
Sacramento' _Alvin dint
Selma Hyc inthi Johnson
Los Angeles Dwayne BrubEiker
Indio 'George Barich
St
2. 2 Six graduate level extensioncourses in Operation of Work
Ewerience Education Were offered at:
Location, Teacher. ,.
Lafayette Melford Brinkerhoff.San Jose.
Salinas
Modesto
Ventura
West-Covina
Elbert Garcia
Gordon Ray
IsIorvin.Spence
Leland Albee
Maurice Fldra
0
2. Two graduate level extension courses in Community College
Work.Experiece Education. were offered at:
4
Location Teacher
Los Altos' Verntk Gillrnore
Whittier Edward Muraski.
2 4 ,
,/
0'0
t'ti Page ,3
2..4 t A unit ori,Career Education Was introducairito the course
content of a ll three levels. Also- members of the staff .of
The. State: Task Force for Career Education made presenta-.
tioris to participants... 1
Questions relating. to Career Education
Were inchded in the p'etests and post tests. %
. SeleCtion of Participant.1
The follovAng summary was prepared from the enrollment of
participant's reported to the evaluator.
,4
3.1 t,,-Enrollment data for five Implementation Classes.i
, Enrollment reported -. 60' . L..
. t,* . .
- t 4,
Seventy-eight percent of those entolnd had no prior EPDAcourses in Work Experience.Education.
4
3.2
* One pqint eight yercent completed EPDA courses in coordina- I.tion and/or administration of Work,Experiente EduCation.,
a
Sixty - seven percent of those enrolled were diiectly involvedin Work Experience Education.
Thirty-seven percent were involved in vocational eduaition asteachers or administrators.
Thirty-thre e.percenf;la n to move into some phase ofWor4.\kExperience Educatio. .1
Enrollment data for six;Managenient Classes
Enrollment reportedThirty-three percent of those enrolled had no p or EPDAclasses in,,Work Experience Edtication.
Sixty-eight percent completed EPDA courses in coordinationand/or administration of Work Experience Education.
,Sixty-six percent were presently involired inWork'Experien.ce.
Forty-five percent were teachers or administrators of vocationaleducation.
Thirty percent plan to move into some phase of Work ExperienceEducati N;
2.3
. t
3.3
Page 4
Enrollment data for two CominunitY-C,ollege Classes
Enrollment reported;
Seventy7two percent, of those enrolled had no prior EPDA, coursein Work -Experience Education
Twenty-eight percent completed EPDA courses in coordinationand /or administration of Work Experience Education.,
Eighty-nine percent were presently involved in 'Work ExperienceEduCation.
Fifty -six percentwere teachers or administrators of Vocational.
Education.
Seventeen percent _plan- to move into some phase or Work Experience,Education.
1.41.
4. ,Evaluation - summary of Pretest,,and ,post test ; I..
.° Results for Implementtion, Management and Community CollegeA 9 ..
.. Courses
4.1 IMPLEMgN-TATION. N-65
Average Average Average Percent 'Percent ofTeacher Pretest Score Post Test Score Increase Incre Perfect
,. ... . -..
, Barich 49. 57 55 . 5. 43 10.,26 85
Brubaker 45. 22 51.88 6. 14. 7266 80.
'hint 43. 36 ..
.52.14 . 8. 78 20.26 - 85
Johnson 48. 88 58. 47 9,..5,9._____ ____19.....61__:. 89..,
Soc'rel/ Mayo 48. 23 56.69 . 8.46 . 17.54 88"
TOTAL 47. 05 54. 84'. .7. 79 ll6`. 55I
26.f
11.
85
,
1
r.
4.2
Teacher
MANAGEMENT N-107
'Page
.
Percehtof _Perfect
Average Average .
Pretest'kore Post Test Score.-
IncreasePercentIncrease
Albee
Biinkerhoff
Flora-
Garci.a.
Ray
Spence
TOTAL
81.2
72-2
70671.45
-76.81
-
97. 9
'80.5 -
`8'9.'68-
82.20 ,
81.76
16.-7
8.3
15. 62
10:55
4. 95
, 20. 44
11.5
21. 09 .
. 16. 04
6.44
y
'92
76
90
77
. 77-7.--
82.475.25 86.4 .
I
11.2
.
15.10
4. 3 COMMUNITY COLLEGE N -116
PercentAverage Average Average PercentTeacher Pretest Score Post Test Score Increase Increase of Perfect
. JGilmore 86. 00 106.10 20.10 '23. 3/ , .91
Muraski 89.12 ,95. 62 6.5 7.29 83
TOTAL '87. 56 j 100. 86 13.3 15.18 87
4. 4 Average percentage of increase
All three, levels = 16 %Average percent of perfect score all levels = 85%
5. 'CONCLUSIONS
5. 1 Of the 209 particitants in the courses a high keriftentage (65%)
were directly involved in Work Eherience Education..
5. 2 Sixty-five percent were directly involved as teachers or
administrators of vocational education programs.
1
27
1
Page 6
5.3 Fifty-five percent of the enrollment,,including all th a levels,were taking an EPDA course for the first time. Forty-five
percent had a prior EPDA course.
5.4 Twenty-eight percent p- 'Jan to move into some phase of work
experience education at a future time.
5.5 The 209 actual enrollment falls short of the 300 anticipated,
however, the high percentage of enrollees directly involved
in work experience education and vocational education indicates
that the courses were relevant to participants needs.
5. 6 The'broaegeographical locatii.on of the courses throughout the
State provided professional development for coordinators in
outlying, areas not served by any other professional development
program.
5.7 Pretest and Post Test ,results indicate a satisfactory growth
factor of 16% and an average score of 85%.0
5. 8 The fact that 4570 of the participants had prior courses in work
experience education indicates that this is a continuing program
leading to unity in existing Wo
in California.
experience education programs
5. 9 Student evaluation results indicate that the course content was
relevant to their needs and that the courses met their stated
objectives.
2 8
a
1
APPENDIX D
6. SUBJEbTIVE EVALUATION
First Semester 1
, Subjective Questionnaire,
The-following information represents results of a subjective questionnaireadministered to the participants .of the Education Professions Development ActProject, "Professional Development Series for Work Experience Educators 1972-73."
Statements 'requesting a multiple choice response have been tallied and
separated according to the course which the respondent was enrolled In.
Statements requiring a short. answer response have been listed. Because of
the quantity of responses, a random sample was useJ and conclusions representing
all responses have been given.
This report follows the fordiat 0 the suojective questionnaire.
*HOWSUCCESSFUL WAS THE INSTRUCTOR IN MEETING THE OBJECTIVES OE THE COURSE?
Implement, Manademerit College
r, Excellent 25 . 52'
Satisfactory 13 : 21
Week. 0 0 0
WHAT CHANGES DO YOU ANTICIPATE MAKING IN YOUR WORK EXPERIENCE PROGRAMS AS
A RESULT OF THIS COURSE?I.
.comments:
Develop a program more closely geared to community needs.
Spend more time onAjob development.
Development of program around goals and objectives.
Check training agreiments thoroughly.
Motivating more students,to become interested In "more than one vocational
Area.
Make more employer contacts. .Jr '
The major change will be within' myself--more confidence.
Set up a program of related Instruction.
More related instruction.
New procedures for visitations.
EXpand exploratory to include ninth and tenth graders.
Reorganize and develop a more systematic pian for related instruction.
Expand In ail areas.
29
Subjective Questionnaire Page 2
Allow students not only to explore different vocational erecs, but also toevaluate his skills and personality traits.
'Spend more time in developing good work training stAtions--not Just acceptingany -type of Job.
IMY
I will attempt to develop better program for special education students.
This course has encouraged me to develop an exploratory program next year.
More Influence on .related instruction.
More on-the-job training in professional offices--exploratory. .
Spending more time in the com munity finding Jobs. Scheduling the exploratorystudents who are not working on rotating schedules.
Improve our system of evaluation for all three programs.
4 Conclusions:
As a result of the Professional Development Act course for workexperience education, the majority of the respondents indicated they wouldmake the following changes in their program:.
Development of related instruction programs..
Initiate or expand exploratory programs.
l
tructure their, programs to operate in closer relatiOnship to the goalsand objectives of work experience education.
2. WHICH TOPIC OR PORTION OF THE COURSE WAS MOST USEFUTO YOU? WHY?rt
Comments:
Oreer education because I am a counselor.
Ca'reer education was the most useful tome because of the way it tiestogether work experience with the rest of the school's curriculum.
StUll Bill- The course helped ma to better understand career education.
Leigs and regulations relating to work experience.
How to set up a five-year plan.
Laws.
DisOussing typical problems with colleagues. Writing plans.
Better understanding of laws and career education.'
30
Yi
.11 Subjective Questionnaire Page 3
Orientation to career education.
Project writing showed us how. and where to get funds.
Child labor laws - -we need to knoW what can legally be done.'
Understanding of career education and development of a district plan.
Child labor laws and the Stull Bill.
It was all valuable to me.
Regulations which govern work experience education.
Organization procedures.
VEA discussionfamiliarity with forms and usage.
Federal projects, career education, laws.
Budgeting and management systems.
Goals and objectives of work experience.
Concliuslons:
The most useful portion of the course to most participants was the
units of instruction involving:
Program funding.
Administrative and education codes.
DiscussiOn of the concepts of career education.
The district plan.
Child labor laws.
3. WHAT TOPIC OR PORTION OF THE COURSE WAS LEAST USEFUL TO YOU? WHY?
comments:
Goals and performance objectives.
Writing of objectives.
Financing.
DisCussions concerning management of programs:,
Discussion of career education.
The one nour used for PPOS.
31
Subjective questiOnnalt Page 4
Budgeting.
Budget classifications,
Objective writing.
Conclusions:
Veiy few of the participants answered this question. The sample of
comments Is so limited that the only conclusion to be drawn is that the
entire course content was relevant.
4. IDENTIFY ANY REDUNDANT SEGMENT OF THE COURSE IN RELATIOTO PREVIOUS TRAINING
OR EXPERIENCE.
Conclusions:
Only a felt of the participants identified redundant segmenti of the
course. Those who commented to this statement had attended the courses
offered lait year or during the summer at California Polytechnic State
University.
HOW COULD THE COURSE BE IMPROVED?
Comments:
Don't assume we know so much.
Its a.hard,course to improve. .
Better leadership and good plans;1 course of study to follow.
Spend more time on goals and objectives.
More time for in-depth instruction on laws and regulations.
More "doing activities".for the. class members.
More time spent onlegal aspects; using actual case studies.
Using more speakers and class` iscussion techniques.
Spend more time on career education.
Need more information on funding of programs.
Have. guests from business and industry to give their feelings on current
employment opportunities.
Limit the material to allow more time for'tareer education and laws.
32.4;
Subjective QuestionnairePage 5
Organize field trips to on -going programs.
-More time needed for related instruction ideas-and materials..
Conclusions:
The major conclusion drawn from the comments Is that more time needs
to be given to the same areas identified in Section 2;,specifically,
career education, laws, funding, related materials, and developing the
di-strict-plan.
6. WHICH TOPIC OR PORTION OF THE COURSE WOULD YOU DESIRE TO HAVE MORE IN-DEPTH
IN-SERVICE TRAINING? ALSO NOTE ANY AREA RELEVANT TO WORK EXPERIENCE
EDUCATION THAT WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE COURSE IN WHICH YOU WOULD LIKE
MORE INFORMATION bR TRAINING.
COMlentS:
Laws and related instruction.
Related instruction activities.
Career education and how It fits into the total curriculum.
Development of good community. relations.
Cooperative education.
Special programs for handicapped students.
,N
Special education students - -how they fit into work experience education.
Goals and objectives for college programs.
Budgeting, reporting and funding of programs.
District. responsibilities. .
More on how to develovexploratory programs.
Writing of .Federal projects and plans.
Placement and communIty,contacts.
Operational proCedures.
Planning related instruction.
Program development.
More Information on development of five-year plan..
Presentations on each of the three types of work experience. Possibly'
presentations from example programs.
33
Subjective Questionnaire Page 6
Labor laws.
Organization of an advisory committee and how to work with them In developinga good community program.
Financing of programs.
We need a lot of_InformatIon on developing programsfor special students.
Conclusions:
Again, the,participants seem to be expressing a need for more time onthe specific areas of interest Indicated in previous conclusions. Two newareas where a strong need was indicated was Information on program develop-ment for special education and handicapped students, and selecting andusing the advisory committee.
7. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE OVERALL PRESENTATIONS OF THE INSTRUCTORS?
Implement Management College,Excellent 26 55 , 7
Satisfactory 11 18 ,1
Weak
8. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PRE AND POST TEST IN MEASURINGTHE IMPORTANT ELEMENTS OF THE COURSE?
`1207.21 Management Ccdlecle.Excellent 19 3Satisfalctory 20 33 .
Veak 5 17 0
9. HOW WOULD YO4 RATE THE INSTRUCTORS USE OF TIME DURING CLASS SESSIONS:LECTURE, INTERACTION, AUDIO-VISUAL, ETC.
. Implement -Manazment College,
Excellent 23 7Satisfactory 14 . 24 1
, Weak 0 . 1 0
,,IO. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE OVERALL FORMAT AND PLAN OF THE PROGRAM?
implement Management,Excellent 21 32
Satisfactory i3 36Weak 2 '' 10
34
College
2
0
'4
Subjective Questionnaire Paye 7
II11. PERSONALLY, HOW BENEFICIAL WAS THE INFORMATION YOU RECEIVED FROM THIS COURSE?
I.
II
, ..
II
Excellent
Implement Management21 36
College6
Satisfactory 1 321
, Weak I . 1 0
Results of Survey Questionnaire For Future Participation
l.)
WOULD YOU BE INTERESTED IN PARTICIPATING IN FUTURE IN-SERVICE TRAINING
PROGRAMS OF THIS TYPE?
II ManagementManagement
- 33 *4b -. 7
College
Yes\Implement Management
II
No 2
/`
4 .0
II
2. SUGGESTIONS FOR SET-UP OF PROGRAM:
.
<
lepiTe_Intnt Management College
Same as this one 24 20 4IIWeekend workshops oli
_specific topics 8 32 4
Workshop meeting every. night -7,
IIfor one or two weeks 1 4 0
-V
1
TThele/au12-27-72
1
f.
4.
APPENDIX. E
PROJECT EVALUATION REPORT
FOR SPRING 1973
Project #40-30569 EFO -39-73
An Educational Professional Development Act Project
and
Project #40-30569 B-3-230'
A Vocational Education Section Part B Project
Prepared By: R. V.\ Poole - Project Evaluator
\ May 25, 1973
Directed To: Kinsey t anzir Project Director
36
This ireport contains information describing the activitiesof the
Professional Development Series for Work'EXperience Education for
the Spring Semester'1973. The Spring program Summary includes:
1. Activities Related to State Priorities
2. Activities Related to Courses offered
3. Selection 'of Participants
4. Evaluation of Pretests and Post Tests
5. Conclusions
1. Activities Related to State Priorities
I 1. 1 Increasing Effectivness of Teaching for Disadvantaged.
.
and HandicaPed. Fifty Four percent of all participants
el in extension courses were directly associated with dis-
advantaged students.IThirty-three percent of all participants in extension
,. . .. .
courses were directly associated with handicapped students.
I . . .
1. 2 Updating Ocoupational Competencies
Participants were selected from broad geographical locations
not served by other professional development activities:.1, These locations were as follows:
1
Sacramento, San Francisco, Hayward, Redding, Fresno
Selma, Torrance, Indi:o and San Diego
1. 3 Updating Supervisory Skills
Seven percent of those enrolled in the courses were adminis-
trators of vocational programs.
37
"Page 2)
ct,
.4 -4
2. Activities Related td Courses Offered,. ..
..
..
2. 1 Five-graduate level extension courses in Operation of,. ,----.
Work Experience4Eddeitin.were offered at:. ,4 :**0 a ', )
'.
i
Location k Teacher.,
San Francisco William Sovel and James Mayo.
Sacramento '`` Alvin., Flint
Selma Hycintt4a JohnSon
Los Angeles Dwayne Brubaker
Indio Gebrge Batich
3.
(
2. 2 Six graduate level extension courses in Management of Work
Experience Education were offered at:
2. 3
44
LOcation Teacher.
Redding
San Francisco
Sacramento
Fresno
Torrance
San Diego
*.
John OlSen
Dennis Ragan
Jcit)ReynoldsNorviin Spencg
Donald'Averill
Robert Menke
.
One graduate level course in Community College Work
Experience Education was offered at:
Location TeaCher
Hayward Vern Gillmore
0
A
A
'goo90807060.
604030
to0
. 1 APPENbiX A'PRE7Esr- Pe$T TEST AVERA Ge. SCoRe5 FOR oPERATion
'Co. -E -58/ SPRING /973 173, 'PRE 123 POST
918
5.7
0
80 88 ems_
Tio 'BARICN BRUBAKER PUNT .JOHNSON MAY0-SOVEL. A ie6RAGE-Acel
oioo
fro
80
60
40
3020
10
0
4'4
PRETEST- POSTTEST AVERAGE: SCORES GOR AllAtiAE1WENrE*00=,...- 581-07 SPRING 1973
RTI'
g-84--- 5
V69
ii4
... ,
r/
V77 7:3
e -66 69
Pig
v1/1
0/------,
COMMUNITY COLLeGeEP'E-58I-8
/00 95908070
CO
50403020.40
(X0 614.1.-moge
Tz
4vER46e- 4L1- L EVel...S
39
NcREAEE
1
100
908070CO
604030
ro
.o
c
APPENDIX .APR47csr- POST. TE$T AVERAC-r.: SCORES FOR OPcSr:A#77;7;
AD.- E- 58/ snk"ING 1973: 4
8S 8399s .$3_,9z_... .L)V \
071 \
\100
.0,..0
91 .
BAR/CH BRUSAKeR FL/N AilAyGL5Ovel.: AvertA0E-41.1...
90'80
70
60- ! So
403o;.0
IC
_jv°
PPTTES4' PoST TES? AYEMAGE SCORES FOR nemflAcliiim7.go-6-561-07 4 SPRING /97,3 ,
.
0.
8 r-.1-795"---___.
:
7-7- , .r
0
,°
_0 G9
'---7/
00.-X--
AvERILL MEttKE or_sgN RAG AN REYNOLDS. .SPEcr AVERAGL.:' AL
comxciNfry COLLEGE-,472-E- ,sstiti- 8
loo 95
'8070Co
So46
2010
c.)
°RIM
79
AVERAGE %
40
L EV17:1-5
\
% INORE/4;G
%MI
1.
/cc
90E30
7060
40'.o;)
26to
APPENDIX APRETEST-! POST TES"- AVERAGE SCORES FOR OPERAT/Olv
CD.-E-581 SPRING /973 c=PRE ®=P09
% EIARICN BFILMAKER FUN .JOHNSON MAY0-.50VEL. AVEMAGE-Au-
.`
.7060
40
3:0
20IC
0
/0
PpETE57- POST TEST AVERAGE' $coR Es FOR ne/AnAocitieNTED-E- 597- 07 5 .117;RING /973
8-7 L'4 f3 1 84
_ 69
/--
7-7 r
i/
73 680-.7 M--6
o4A
/0
WIIP /o0iw 1 /
1 0,_
AAVERILL nifEnIKE OLSEN! RAG.41`7, REYNOLD.,' SPEi'iCC AVERAGE At
1
:
0/-?(F.
COMMUNITY COLLEGE-x420-ff - 5.a/-
/0090
807060504930ao
9
I
1
89
7/2
AVERAGE %, 4L1-1..EvELs
FINci; E/45E
Page 3
2. 4 A unit on Career Education was included in the course content
at all three levels. Questions relating to Career EducatiOn
were included in the Pretests' and post tests.
3. Selection of Participants
The following summary was prepared from the Registration Forms
of participants enrolled in the Extension Classes.
3. 1 Enrollment data for five Operation Classes.
Enrollment reported - 78
Forty-five percent of those enrolled had no prior EPDA courses
in Work Experience Education.
Fifty-five percentcompleted EFDA courses in Implementation
Coordination and/or Administration of Work Experience Education.
Fifty percent continued on into the Operation Classes from the
Implementation classes offered in the fall.
Forty-eight percent of those enrolled were directly involved in
Work Experience Education.
Sixty-six percent were involved in vocational education as teachers
or administrators.
Ninteen percent use the course content as background material
needed for performance of their present teaching assignment, and
plan to move Into Work Experience.
3. 2 Enrollment data for six Management Classes
Enrollment reported -119
Fifty -one percent of those enrolled had no prior EPDA classes in
Work ExperieRce Education.
4 2rA
Page 4
Fifty-eight percent completed EPDA courses in coordination,
implementation, or administration of Work Experience Education.
Thirty-three percent were presently involved in Work Experience.
Sixty-five percent were teachers or administrators of vocationaleducation.
Eighteen percent plan to move into some phase of Work Experience
Education.
3. 3 EnrollMent data for one COmmunity College glass
Enrollment reported - 11
Fifty-five percent of those enrolled had no prior EPDA course
in Work Experience Education.
Forty-five percent completed EPDA courses in coordination
and / or administration of Work Experience Education
Sixty-three percent were presently involved in Work Experience
Education.
Fifty-fille percent were teachers or administrato of Vocational
Education Program.
4. Evaluation Summary of Pretest and Post test
Results for Operation, Management and Community CollegeCourses (Also t see Appendix A)
4.1 OPERATION N-65
Percent ofPerfectTeacher
(ED-F 581-06)
Average Average Average PercentPretest Score Post test Score Increase Increase
Barich 43.50 58.88 15.38 35.34 91%
Brubaker 43.30 .. 55.15 11.85 27.36 85%
Flint 43.89 54.21 10.32 23.51 83%
Johnson 45.94 57.89 11.95 26.01 89%.
Mayo-Sovel 42.6t 5 7 . 15 14.49 33.96 88%.
TOTAL AVERAGE SCORE 87%143
IPage 5
IITeacher
Averill
I MenkeOlsen.
Ragan
Reynolds
ISpence
MANAGEMENT N-107
AveragePretest Score
(ED - E - 581 - 07)I.
Average AveragePost test Score Increase
PercentIncrease
Percent ofPerfect
71.16 81.30 11.02 15.48 77%
.69. 75 93t.03 23. 28 33.37 87%
70.15 89.35 19.20 27.36 84%
79.13 90.45 11.32 14.30 85%
78.27 95.90 17.63 22.52 90%
72.28 89.53 17.25 23.86 84%
TOTAL AVERAGE SCORE 85%
I .
.N COMMUNITY COLLEGE N-116(ED - E - 581 -.8)
I Average Average Average Percent Percent ofTeacher Pretest Score Post test Score Increase Increase Perfect
i GiUmore 91.91 110.33 18.42 20.04 95%
I .
4.4 Average Percentage of Increase for all three levels - 24%
IAverage Grade for all Courses - 89%
0 5. CONCLUSIONS
The following points are significant indicators of success of the project.
1 5.1 Forty-four percent of the total enrollment were practitionersin Work Experience Education
I5.2 Fifty-six percent of those enrolled were teacher's or administratorsof vocational education program in high schools and community
Icolleges.
4 4
Page 6
5.3 Fortyanine percent of the enrollment had no prior E. P.D. A.
course in Work Experience Education.
5.4 The holding power of the E. P. D. A. Classes in Work Experience
Education is demonstrated by 55% of those enrolled in the Spring
operation classes having continued on from the Fall classes.
5.5 Nineteen percent of those teaching in other disciplines plan to
move into Work Experience Education in the future:
5. 6 The location of courses at various points throughout the State
provided for- professional development of coordinators in areas
-not served by a similar program.A
5. 7 Pretest Post-test results indicate a satisfactory groWth factor
of 24% and an average post test score of 89%.
5.8 A high percentage of the enrollment in all three levels (51%)I
had continued on from a prior inservice extension course in
Work Experience Education. This indicates that this is acontinuing program which lends unity to Work Experience Education
throughout California.
5. 9 The results of the student subjeCtive evaluation indicate that the
courses provide relivency and that students were well satisfied
with the instructors presentations of the ..nurse content.
I
APPENDIX F
INTERIM. PROJECT EVALUATION REPORT
Subjective Questionnairea
Project #40-30569 EFO 39-73
An_Educational Profesiional Development Act Project
and
Project #40-30569 B-3-230
A Vocational Education Section Part B Project
ftepated
ainected To:
A. L. Thele, Project EvaluatorMay 29, 1973
Kinsey Tanner, Project Director
46
1
SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION (Spring Semester)
Second SemesterSubjective Questionnaire
The following information represents results of a subjective questionnaireadministered to the participants of the Education Professions Development ActProject, Spring Semester 1973, "Professional Development Series for Work Expe.rience Educators 1972 -73."
Statements requesting a multiple choice response have been tallied andseparated according to the course which the respondent was enrolled in.
Statements requfring a short answer response have ben listed. Because of Ithe quantity of responses, a random sample was. used and conclusions representingall responses have been given.
This repoit follows the format of the subjective questionnaire.
HOW SUCCESSFUL WAS THE INSTRUCTOR IN MEETING THE OBJECTIVES OF THE COURSE?
Operational Management College
Excellent 62 94 4
Satisfactory 6 19 4.
Weak 0 0 0
1. WHAT CHANGES DO YOU ANTICIPATE MAKING IN YOUR WORK EXPERIENCE PROGRAMS AS
A RESULT OF THIS COURSE?
Commenta:
Work in developing our exploratory work experience program so that we can
involve more students.
Develop a legal vocational work experience program to confirm with State
and Federal laws.
Expand our general work experience program using such ideas as performanceobjectives and contracts.
Expand our'public relations program in th'escommunity.
We will attempt to develop an extensive exploratory program for our students,and expand on the general Wand vocational programs. J.
47
44,
I
1.
1
48
Subjective Questionnaire - Second Semester Page 2
An attempt will be made to involve elementary school students, particularly
the fifth and sixth grade levels in expiratory work experience.
We cannot make changes until we can convince district to expand the teacher
allotments for work experiCnce.
We will establish a cook and baker's program.
Reorganize our related instruction program.
Develop a more effective public relations program.
Develop standards and program procedures for'our program.
Will utilize the LAPS which was developed by the State Department.
Tighten procedures re%Ording enrollment and:labor codes.
Expand our vocational program.
Implement new methods .of related instruction.
Offer more meaningful related instruction.
Develop program according to established goals.
Expand our exploratory program.
Concentrate on developing a better in-plant vocational program.
Incorporating exploratory work experience in the science fields.
Conctu4ion4:
As a result of the Professional Development Act course for WorkExperience Education, the majority of respondents indicated they would
make the following changes in their programs:
Develop a more meaningful program for related instruction.
Expansion of exploratory programs.
Revise existing policies and procedures in relationship with existingState Education Codes and State and Federal Labor laws.
2. WHICH TOPIC OR PORTION OF THE COURSE WAS MOST USEFUL TO YOU? WHY?
Topics dealing with laws related to work experience education.
Exchanging of ideas.
Subjective Questionnaire - Second Semester Page 3
Labor laws.
Information on exploratory programs.
Budget.
Summer school programs.
Program management and finance.
Articulation with the lower grades.
Project writing.
Performance objectives.
The entire program was useful.
Career information.
Instructions on how to prepare and use LAPS.
Public relations and related instruction.
Information on how to write a State plan.
'Information on goals and objectives.
Career education.
Information about the Stull Bill.
PPBS.
Management of work experience education programs.
Instructional goals and objectives.
Conctu4Lon4:
The most useful portion of the course to most partidipants were the
units of instruction involving:t,
Concepts of career education.
Writing of performance objectives.
Developing district and State plans.,
State and Federal Labor laws.
4 9
-
`Subjective Questionnaire - Second Semester
3. WHAT TOPIC OR PORTION OF THE COURSE WAS LEAST. USEFUL TO YOU?, WHY?
Comments:
The Stull tilljwas.a waste of time. ,
Behavioral objectives.
1
Public relations.
Goals and objectives.
Conceptual design of work experience education.,
Learning activity packages.
Laws that do not apply.ti
Objectives-and funding of programs.a
funding of programs,
Objectives.
Organizational patterns.
Budgeting.
Conchaion6:\
.
The majority of those'responding to this'question were.
participantswho had attended previous EPDA courses, and workshops at Cal-Poly State
. University. From the remarks made by the participants, there seemed to,be an indication that the emphasis placed on goals and objectives should ,
be updated; and, that carefully prepared audio-visual techniques be usedin presenting these topics.
4. IDENTIFY ANY REDUNDANT SEGMENT OF THE 'COURSE IN RELATION TO.PREVIOUS TRAINING
OR.EXPERIENCE.
Comments: .
Unit 1 conceptual design was a review of previous experiende.
Work permits and public relations programs.
All I hear.at,these classes are labor laws, but I still need moreinformation qn them.
All the information was excellent and timely.
50
t3
, Subjective Questionnaire - Second Semester Page 5
Writing performance objectives.
Work permits---too much emphasis on accountability and PPBS.
Work permits.
Funding..
CO nctusio nA :
Very few participants indicated that the course was redundant. THeparticipants responding to this section indicated they had attendedprevious inservice courses and workshops where many of the same topics.
were discussed. The lack of responses under this section lead. to theconclusion that all aspects of this program were relevant to currentneeds.
HOW COULD THE COURSE BE IMPROVED?.
Comment4:
Separate the neophytes from those more experienced in work experience
edutation.
More time liven to class discussion.
Would like additional time built in for discussion of each others programs.
.Mor! time should be spent on budget and finance.
Don't
\know--greatas it was.
Allowihg teacher more.-freedom in program.
Excellent, as it is.
Provide mor'epririted reference materials.
Expand program\to includeive hours of instruction.,
More audio-visu&I\.and demonstrations.
More information on related instruction and,career education.
Using more speakers.\
Lot more ,information on, career education.
,
conetu,s4on.6:
The majority of participants indicated that they were very pleasedwith the program as it was presented. There were requests for additional
.1
s,
Oft
Subjective Questionnaire - Second Semester "rage 6
time for class interactions and discussions of local problems and programs.There seemed to be an interest in related instruction and materialsavailable,for related instruction programs.
6. WHICH TOPIC OR PORTION OF THE COURSE WOULD YQU DESIRE TO HAVE MORE IN-DEPTHINSERVICE TRAINING? ALSO NOTE ANY AREA RELEVANT TO WORK EXPERIENCE EDUCA-TION THAT WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE COURSE IN WHICH YOU WOULD LIKE MORE
INFORMATION OR TRAINING?
Comments:
Methods of selling program to administration and public.
A.continuation of this course would be good.
A course designed to allow us to observe work experience students onvarious types of training stations.
More infOrmation is needed on preparing performance objectives-
Goals and objectives.
Career education.
Funding.
Budget and finance.
Related instruction.
More specific,infOrmatiton on how work experience programs operate incommunity city colleges and how they are different.from secondary programs.
Method of related instruction.
.
'Need more time on some of the areas that were covered!.
Financing.
.
Work experience programs.
ILaws. ,
Public relations on campus.
II
,
More emphasis on serving the needs of special educatiOnstudents.
II
Discussions on union problems.
i
.
,.
t
How to approach. employers.
Hoy to-evaluate a work experience program.. ,
5'2
1
Subjective Questionnaire - Second Semester
The impact of career education on work experiende education.
The use of advisor.; committees.
Page
Information on developing programs for special students,
Conetu4ion4:
A definite need was indicated for attention to be given in futurecourses to the handicapped and uther special edudation students. Anotherremark which prevailed throughout the answers to this statement was need .
for understanding:the responsibilities and use of advisory committees.Many pai.ficipants felt like the program which was offered was well struc-tured except more time was needed on areas involving funding of work
= werience education, methods of developing and implementing a publicrelations program, and general program operational procedures.
7., HOW WOULD-YOU RATE THE OVERALL PRESENTATIONS OF.THE INSTRUCTORS?
ssa ExcellentSatisfactoryWeak ,. ,
=
Operational Management' College61
. 7 .
0
8
23
0 .,
4
4
0:
8. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PRE AND POST TEST IN MEASURING'THEIMPORTANT ELEMENTS OF THE COURSE?
,..
. .0..
Operational. Management CollegeExcellent 23 26 .
.oSatisfactory 41 56
,
Weak . 4 27 0
9. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE INSTRUCTORS USE OF TIME DURING cuss SESSIONS:.LECTURE,NTERACTIOR, AUDIO-VISUAL, ETC.
, Operational Management CollegeExcellent . 57 89 3 '
,. SatisfiActory 11 .20 5Weak t 0 0 0
10. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE OVERALL FORMAT AND PLAN OF THE'PROGRAM?
.Operational Management . CollegeExcellent 49 . -
3-...,....:1Satisfactory 18 30 5--__-.
Weak . 0 1 0.,.
--.
11. PERSONALLY, HOW BENEFICIAL WAS THE INFORMATION Y.O4'41ECEIVED FROM THIS COURSE?, ,1.
Operational .Management CollegeExcellent - 58
{. . 79 6Satisfactory '''' 9
.
29 2/
Weak 1 1 0
53
,14
,Subjective Questionnaire -"Second Semester .Page EL.
keauttzo6 Sunveui Queationnaiite For. Future rcucticiiclation
1. WOULD YOU BF INTERESTED IN PARTICIPATING IN FUTURE INSERVICE TRAINING
PROGRAMS OF THIS TYPE?
\\Operational Management &legeYes t4
No .. \ 4 6 0.
.
2. SUGGESTIONS FOR SET-UP OF PROGRAM.
43ferational --Malement , 'Col 1 ege
Same as this one.
'48 8
Weekend workshops on , I
spedfic.topics 16. 28 0,
Workshop meeting every nightfor one or two weeks 1 , 3 ,A1
1.
1.
0 S,
TThele/au5/30/73
r .
\-f
. 5 4
err
1
S.
APPS IX G
QUARTERLY REPORT
July 1 - September 361 1972
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT SERIES FOR WORK EXPERIENCE EDUCATION .
Proje^t f40-30569EFO 39-73,
'Eadational Profesticnii.DevtiOpment Act Ptoject
0
o and
Project #40 -30569 B-3-230
A Vocational EdUcation Section Part B Project
California Polytechnic State University
San Luis Obispo, California
c.f
Kinsey Tanner, Director
Distributed to:
'Dr. James Becket
E. David GrafAllan HolmesDr. DaleAndrewsHoward BoroughsDr., Carl Cummins
Dr. Walter SchroederDr. Don Morris
Robert Poole.
5 5
I. PLANNING
1. The description_of'objectives of the project as stated in the contractare as follows:
1
This project is designed'to encompass eight basic objectives:
1.1. Conduct a summer workshop designed to familiarize educatorswith concepts of career education and their relationships withwork experience education.'
1.2. Conduct a summer workshop designed to familiarize workexperienceeducation personnel with materials'and methods for conductingrelated instruction classes.
1.3. ,Trainteight instructors who will present to participants of. themanagement courses, the strong philosophical and educationalreasons why goals and objectives are needed for work experienceeducation.
1.4. Conduct instructor training workshops to train teachers of thecourses the concepts of career education.
1.5. Present ten' (10) graduate level extension courses (5 in the falland 5 in the .spring) entitled "Work Experience Education-ImOlezientation" and "Work Experience Education-Operational."These courses to-be offered in five locations throughout the state..The 250 students attending will earn 2 quarter units of graduatecredit for each class. (Twenty-fiye hour6 of instruction perclass.)
. Present eleven (11) graduate level extension courses (5 in thefall and-6 in the spring). entitled, "Work Experience Education-Management" at eleven different locations for,300 participants.Participants will be-selected from those who. have previously,'attended the beginning courses and/or are.responsible foradministrative functions. Participants will receive three quarterunits of credit (Thirty hours of instruction.),
1.7. Present ta:ee (3) graduate level extension courses (1 in the fall .
and 2 in the spring) entitled, "Work Experience Education-In thei Community College." These arses will be offered in threelocations throughout the state. The 75 participants selectedto attend will earn three'quarter units of graduate credit.(Thirty hours of Instruction.)
1.8.' Provide in all four, courses a unit(sj in career education concepts1 /
as -they 're-ra-te to work experience education andto state and1\national educational priority.I
2. The courses offered are is follows:
Ed-E=581-05 - Work Experience Education-Implementation; for first and/second year work experience coordinators; types of work experience programs
and Methods of implementing a work experience program as a part of thetotal-curriculum (no prerequisite).
,
1.
/Ed -E {581 -06 - Work Experience Education-Operation; given in spring to/follbw Ed-E-581-05; labor codes, funding, public relations, related /instruction, education and administrative codes (prerequisite Ed-E-514or Ed-E-581-06 or permission of structor).
I
Ed-E-581-07 - Work Experience Education-Management; for experiencedcoordinators and administrators; accountability, financing and management
pt
theories for work experience education.
Ed-E-581-08 - Work Experience Education-Community College; for workexperience coordinators and cooperative education teachers at communitycolleges; development and operation procedures for work experienceprograms in the community colleges; accountability, education andadministrative codes, State Plan for Vocational Education in the communitycolleges.
3. The time schedule for objectives of the project as stated in the contractareas follows:
OBJECTIVES MET:
1. Summer workshop (Career' Education2.' Planning meeting3. Summer workshop (Materials for Related Instruction)4. Extension course teacher planning session (1.7-7)5. Extension course teacher planning session (1.7=5)6. Extension course teacher planning session (1.7-6)
OBJECTIVES IN PROGRESS:
7. Selection of participants"8. Courses to be offered (1 night per week -8 weeks
1.7-5)
9. Courses to be offered (1 night per week -10 weeks
1.7-7, 1.7-6) .
;OBJECTIVES PLANNED FOR:
10. Planning and evaluation meeting (1.7-5)11. Planning and evaluation meeting <1.7-6)12. Planning and evaluation meeting (1.7-7)13. Courses tO be offered (1 nig t per week -8 weeks
1.7-5)
14. Courses to be offered-(1 night per week -10 weeks1.7-6, 1.7-7) N
15. Evaluation meeting with course instructors (1.7-5)..16. Evaluation meeting with course instructors (1.7-6)..17. Evaluation meeting with course instructo'i i (1.7 -7)'..
18. 'Evaluation report
II. PARTICIPANT SELECTION
6/26-30/727/15-168/21-248/21-248/21-248/28-30
9/1-15
10/2 -12/1
10/2-12-14
12/91/6-731/13
2/12-4/13
2/12-4/264/285/55/12
5/28
1. The criteria for selection and the type of participants as stated in the
project are as follows:
Participants will be selected from those educators thaehavedemonstrated knowledge and/or interest in work experience education.Selection of teacher - trainers will be conducted by the project
director with assistance from the California State Consultant
57
for Work Experience Education and the head of the EducationDepartment, California Polytechnic State University.
Those who will attend the inservice training programs will be
selected by county and school directors of vocational educationin the immediate area being served by these courses.
745 persons will participate in the project. Participation
will be as follows:
1. 120 educators will attend the summer workshops at Cal Poly,
San Luis Obispo.
2. 250.new coordinators will be selected to attend the inserviceimplementation and operational, courses offered in Indio,
Pomona, Stockton, San Diego and Los Angeles.
3. 300 coordinators, vocational education administrators, counselors,
.offered in Fresno, Modesto, Sacramento, Los Angeles, San Mateo,etc. will be selected to attend the inservice management course
Marin County, Redding, San Diego, Long Beach, San Luis Obispo
and Salinas. L .
4. 75 community college coordinators and vocational personnel will
be selected to attend the inservice community college course
offered in San Mateo, Huntington, Beach and Pasadena.
Special emphasis will be given to the selection of participants in
continuation education and special education.
2. Applications received to date include only the participants in theCareer Education Workshop, June 26-30, and the WOrk Experience Education
Workshop, August 21-25, both held on the Cal Poly Campus in San Luis
Obispo.
65 people participated in the Career Education Workshop. By position,
the participant breakdown was:
22 Teachers17 Work Experience Education Personnel
11 Directors of Vocational Programs
r 8 Guidance Personnel2, College Teachers3 Secondary Administrators
2 Graduate Students
73 people participated in the Work Experience Education Workshop, August
21=25. By position, the participant breakdown was:
37 Work Experience Education Personnel
15 Teacherg11 Directors of Vocational Programs
4 Guidance Personnel4 Secondary Administrators`
2 Graduate Students
5a
I
The geographical breakdown of the Career Education Workshop was asfollows:
Centril Coast 17
Southern California 15San Francisco Bay Area 13
Central Valley 10Northern Valley 6
Southern California Desert 2
Northern Coast 2
65
The geographical breakdown of the Work Experience Education Workshopvas as follows:
San Francisco Bay Area 19Southern California . 18
Central Coast 12
Northern Valley 6
Southern California Desert 5Northern Coast 3
73
Data -on participant responsibility for disadvantaged and handicappedwas not available for this report.
III. OPERATION
1. Both the stated objectives and time schedule for the project have beenmet to date. The two summer workshops were completed, and judging fromevaluative data from the participants, were highly successful. Bothwere well attended and well received by the participants.. In spite ofnear 100 temperatures, the first and second days of the Work ExperienceEducation Workshop, attendance was excellent. The cooperation of the CalPoly Staff and Dr. Walter Schroeder, Head, Education Department, wa$'.excellent. The workshop agendas are included as appendix items A and B.The evaluative data is included as appendix items C and D.
2. During the quarter, instructors were contracted and sites were selectedfor the extension courses. Under the direction of the Project Director,the course of study outlines were developed for all four courses. Publicitybrochures were printed and distributed state wide to selected people.(See Appendix. E for brochure). Pre and post tests and subjective evaluationinstruments were developed by the project evaluators. Names and addressesof instructors and evaluators are attached in Appendix F. In addition tothe instructor's manuals, reference material for each course was collectedand compiled. The_instructor's training sessions were held at San LuisObispo in late August and the course manuals and reference materialsfurnished to them.
The fall schedule of classes will begin the week of October 2. Noparticipant data is available at this writing as enrollments wall
continue through October 6.
59
A change. was made in alias location from Stockton to Selma. This wasnecessary becau-se of difficulty in contracting. for a facility and to try
.
to fill a gsp in coverage of the stette. At this time, I see no otheTmajor changes or problems in meeting the objectives of the project.
60
100
41 0"1a.
g44
U 1
O 0
4i1.9 Wy
04.)
013
.444 4.a .1
mW
O0
0.0 LI
a.
a.
00.
0.4J
4J.0 1144
'0:109
0 0W
01.4
00-4
O 0 In W
-0
O",0
a0caW.
a.
00
gII
0 0O
GO
0$.4LI
'O
1.111
W04
4J0.
a00 0
00 0
O 4.144 0
LI 0 490 0C
Ug
CU
O .a
4p1 Q04to, $.
O g
00
C.)
U0 4.//-4.1
w
,.a 0 w
.34.3
0N
a43
kA w
,-.1p..10
4-1 4-1-
pd,o 0 Q
Z..../.
4J4J
r'lw
4.,4.,4
01 >4
O.4
A A
4 ...1c..)
4C1-1O
'.
C.)
r-I0 I",
MO"-I 0
C..)
0 .0C
a'0
01
4 a.. a
4..1
i.-1 0
M ..1LI
9-4
t..0
I
to-.1E
-9
01 at co,W
r.143
u0 0M
g0
0(..)
vii0
I-I1
4J44.)0r..-
"5 o 8t.:
0 .0..4
1.4..4
E-I
041
41.0
0...0or 0a
xit:o3 N
1.4
04J
kl,0
00
es1W
0 al.
'a..-1
41
" 4"741
g4; f;31
4. 1June 28
LP
N .
0 C14
Sra.
1-). o a.
0 z1-3:00
Dr. Patrick J. Weagraff
944 014
W 0 P
10
0P
ublic Services O
ccupations.3d
0)(44
11ca)
oC...)
O .0
Cr
43P
., CCurriculum Project
.c
0W
sei§. -g.0 u
State Department of Education
W1,
r-I
4.11
8`4
uII"
4/ WV
/ ;40 ..
0Current Curriculum Practices and
.i.,
c
4
o0 C4
43 Z0 0
0*1 0
4.1C
..)e
Activities in Career Education
.-1 ..-101
4.,G
x4..9
is3a.J
14C
O00
cn. V
al1" V
4- 0
Dr. Patrick J. Weagraff, Director of a
O ,..,
cle
o m
a I.-IC
/3as
E.
United States Office of Education
-0
>.
Project to develop nationally
u
ABOUT THE PROGRAM PRESENTATIONS
applicable guidelines for one of the
career education Clusteri, willpresemr
an over vier of current curriculum
IA-actives and "activities in career
education.
Participanel will be
proliided ouiterials describing the six
curriculum project's being conducted
across the United States as well as
the names of individuals to contact
for further information. A typical
"model" will be provided.
Samples of
career education curriculum materials
that local teachers and administrators
may expect in comingmonths will also
be distributed.
June 26
1:00
7Orientation and'introductidns,
Objectives of the workshop
2-5:00
Mr. Paul Peters, Director
Career Education
California State Department of
Education
'
Mr. Paul Peters,. Director of Career Ed-.
ucation, and members of the California'
State Career Education Task Force will
present information and materials:in
the following major areas:
1.
Concepts of Career Education for
2.
Status of Career Education in
California.
3. Task Force operation.
4.
Strategies for implementation of
Career Education 'in California.
June 27
1-5:00
Mr. Paul Peters, Director of Career Ed-
ucation, and members of the California
State Career Education Task Force will
continue with their presentation. Major
emphasis will alsozbe placed on the
national scope of Career Education.
0,U
VI
riw
41271
L;4.1
to0
0.611111.11
Z4C
1.4de
3-5:00
Mr. Harry Krell, Coordnaior. -
Work Experience Education
Covina Valley Unified School
District:
Work Experience Education is an
C1.7
Integral Part of Career Education-,,
Work Experience Educatioh assists
students in identifying tentative
career goals through selective
employment in the world of work.
It is recognized that the level of
achievement'ability, motivation,-
and goals of students vary in degree;
all studentsneed the Opportunity
to develop their unique vocational
potential.
The Covina Valley Unified
School District-has developed a
-
computer- assisted approach of
_selecting students who.have reached
the level of proficiency necessary
for placement in vocational training
sites within the community. .The
system of selecting and placing
students will.be discussed during
this session.
ai"Im
e NE
poi I=.
low
June 29
1-5:00
Mr. Robert A. Sampieri
Director of the Comprehensive
Career Education. Model
Los Angeles City Schools
As director of one of the six United
States Careet Education Models, Mr.
Sampieri will
direct'his presentation
to four major areas:
1.
Identification of goals and
objectives4
career education.
2.
Utilization of district personnel` :.
.to develop goals
and objectives
of career education.
3.
Format of an instructional unit
to accomplish goals and objectives
of career education.
'4.. 4.
Identifying strategiei of installing
and implementing the goals and
objectives of career educatiOn.
tOJune 30
1-5:00
Mr. Norvin Spence, Supervisor
Work Experience Education
Modesto City. Schools
w Mr. Spence will present the Modesto'
City Schools Career
Edudation Model
Project which involves thirty junior
high students and two teachers r-one---
in social stud esand--o.rT language
e student's selected thenine-
-week model as one of the thirty-six
choices of an.activity--seventy-five
minute mini-course-1)y 'career.
The
model.is organized around this
involvement of the student in acti-
vities that relate to three United
States Office of Education Occupational
Clusters in Community Service Careers.
CREDIT - Ed-647-01 CareerEdUcation
(1.5 units professional ciedi
WORKSHOP FEE - $20':00,
HOUSING - Excellent dormitories on the
campus at the following rates:
-- $5.00 per day - one per room
$4.00 per day - two per room
STEAK BARBECUE.? Tuesday evening,
June 27, 6:00 p.m. Poly Grove, $5.50
This is An event that no one should
miss!
PARKINt,PERMITS - Required of all
-
"
Vehicles on camptis:
Will be avail-
' able at the Registration Desk at
$1.00.foNthe Workshop.
WORKSHOP ROOM NUMBER - Science E27
._
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONTACT:
'
ALLAN HOLMES
TONYTHELE
Workshop Coordinators
Education Department
California State .Polytechnic College
San Luis Obispo, CA'93401.
.W
O IM
O.
'1=
11!
1111
1IM
O IW
OIN
III=
1
0.4 0 0.1 0 101
"0
Po
P.-.0 r..
1-1
a)o
,.
oal
g'
I
CO
r 01L
sti
cl.
gcn
" o1
m
coe
til,ta
tr
4S
oo
Co.
kg:
cn,N
1rt
P.-.
.4n
ca4
a g
ge
rt
0.
to
OO.
0° t-
IP"
On
P.-
.cn
''411
33
NO
rt=
"cr
n"
8.)
Op.
-M tn a.
_o
OI.
-4
AI-
,O
ell
0'0
00
I.+
0C
M 3
0 0
n11
1,
ti O
V
.M
I 11
..,1
1111
1µ
ct,
CO
0
NR
.010144
w
1.4
0.c V
44ela 14el
k0w..-40%
V.-4 w.
1
..>
,>
, 410 0
nr./1.4
W00.-4
104.414"
Id40
Z S
i0
100
0 0O
.4.4
0a .
V0 V
A0 0
w or.
O 411
urO
CY
e(,
o-4
s, ....,a
g.. -
o0
0 li.0 V
'V
1.4
o a.
m o
c ce
o....4..l4w
4.1 0011 3
a:
44
a.
or44.1
..otMajor goals, program goals,
-0
0..1
V 0
14)4M 1.4
performance objectives, will be
g A
areviewed.
fA
.
4111.
WORKSHOP'PROGRAM AND SCHEDULE
Monday, August 21
.,
1:00
Enrollment, schedule', orientation,
objectives'& pre-test -
Staff
2:00
Provisions for related instruc-
_tion in California ,Administrative
14.m
4'
14C
Yi41
(Code, Title 5
Staff
0.4
44 44.O
0 .-.42:30
Break andsinteraction,
4.J
4-sco
co Rr4.1
O 0 th :41
3:00
Elements of related instruction-
A A
13
1.. Goals
.Spence
2. Economic trends
3. Reliedial .
10
..
w a
-a4
of1.9
4if
VI
)
m0
0ta
,
a0 c c
..4c
00
.0
3:45- Goals & objectives of work exper-
t°
00 tir
1444
coas
1arm, 5:00
ience education.-
Averill
O 0
O 0
0;44 0c1P
0)..-4O
VO
W .04./
O.-1411 'a
I.0 II
90Id
'a0 )
' 14IC
4.0 0ri.
a0
yr4.4
Ch
Va
r.1 liU
0C
P
.0C
P*
E-i
.4113
...1IA
W C
AC
u.0
>, .-4
CA
CO
= .-1
CO
Cd
0., 1
4 C0
.0a. 0.
r.1V
A 0
00
C1
.."/ 4 00
010
0cis
'4J
sr).0
.cn
4..)to
" vs'
roA
44 t;si413
1.-1..4 43
IiOi
it44 0
140 C
D.
P',
0, 0O
0C
Y
W.
a;11
C...)
; at'A
4.640 04 .
00
0C
l)0 rt
a0 ..4
V0
0.-4
00a -
0 ctO
4)C
rri 0
CY
04 1.4
CY
4.4;44 x
.-4W
/00
1.40
00W
mi
co0
'"0 cal
00
.0A
.2,
0so
se .0 ,1(11
aa
..4
0to
i 0 =i
-4C
i)1.1
F-4
.30
V44 ..4
bp
Zile
V '44 . Z
44.1
IS '00
04.1 0 ir-
0o 2
0 .4u
.co z
..c 0ux. 0
we E
N is.
rit
4.1C
O
I
W 1.1
Tuesday, August 22
r.1g
1:00
aa.
Techniques for individualized
instruction -
'Averill
1. Learning Activity Packages
2. Independent study
.3. Outside assignments
'4. Individual reports
2:30
Break and interaction.
3:00
Materials for individualizing
instruction -
Spence
Samples of LAPs which have been
'developed and refined will be
distributed to all participants.
4:00- DevglopMent of materials for
.5:00
individualized instruction-Averill,
Spence
Participants will be given an
opportunity to develop a LAP or
other materials which can be
'
used by4individual work exper-
ience education students.
Wednesday, August 23
1:00
Techniques for conducting group
instruction =
Spence
Role playing, simulation, games
socio-drama,'panel discussion,
lectures, etc.
2:30,
Break and interaction.
3:00
Materials for conducting group
instruction -
Averill
Samples of materials which have
been developed -for conducting
group instruction will be dis-,
tributed and discussed.
4:00- Development of materials for
QD
5:00
group instruction Activities.
6:00
Barbecue, Poly Grove.
Thursday, August 24
1:00
Sharinvreative.work - Averill,
Spence
Individual and group materials
developed during the previous
two days will be discussed.
2:30
The PPBS Cycle -
Averill
3:00
Break and interaction.
3:30
The PPBS Cost Data Sheet-Averill
Participants will be given infor-
_-mation on how to comply with
.PPBS insofar as program,costs
are concerned.
my
am
um mum um
MN
=II
4:39- Complete your own data sheet.
5:0N Each participant will get a
start toward preparing a cost
data sheet applicable to his
own program.
Friday, August 25
8:00
Patterns for summer work exper-
ience education -
Averill,
Spence
Various approaches to offering-
work experience education in
summer school will'be pre-
sented.
9:30
Projects 1972-73 -
Staff
10:00
Break and interaction.
10:30
Questions, problems, answers
and solutions -
Staff
Participants will have an
t,
opportunity xo raise specific
questions 61.pose problems con-.
cerning or relating to their
own work experience education
CZ:
program.
The staff will be
avaflable to provide .answers
and solutions.
11::30- Post test and certificates-Staff
12:00
WORKSHOP INSTRUCTORS
Donald Averill, Director of Career
Education, Huntington .Beach Unlop.
High School District. Past president
of California Association of Work
Experience Educators.
porvin Spence, Supervisor of WOrk
'Experience Education, Modesto'City
Schools.
President of California
- Association of Work Experience
Educators.
No
imm
Imo
0-
CREDIT - Ed-644-01Work Ekperience
Education (1.5 units of
professional credit)
WORKSHOP FEE - $20.00
HOUSING - Excellent residence halts on
the campus at the following
rates:
$5.00 per day - one per room
$4.00 per day - two per room
STEAK BARBECUE - Wednesday evening,
August 23, 6:00 p.m., Poly GroVe,"$5.50.
An event that no one should miss!__
PARKING PERMITS - Required of all
vehicles on campus. Available at
the Registration Desk for $1.00.
WORKSHOP ROOM NUMBER - Science E27
WORKSHOP CONSULTANT - Dr. Norman Eisen,
Director of Educational Services,
Whittier Union'Hiei School District
RESOURCE PERSON - Allan HoIMes,
State. Consultant for Work Experience
Education
fi
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION'QONTACT:
TONY THELE
Workshop Coordinator
Education Department
(8057546-2629)
California P4lytechnic State University
San Ltiis Obispo, CA93401
mum
mm
ies
.sm
e
C) 1 0. rr 0 rr
--
OD
(1)
"
a-
'111
rrrr
0-.
It
rr 0 rn is
C)
03 ?- 111 0 'N. O
CC
I03
0rr
rrit
'0ce
O0
0w
.IV
00 0
0
r8
al3
4cp
crn
t-,,,
Rt
1,,,,
,...
..P2
,9g
.u,
4:1
1
Pi1.
n0
IN
IC
IC
n03
03.
t,.0
0C
OI
? Pe
rrP
IG
.0-
104
Orr
,-'
CA
)10'
0rr
11I
Cr
.4".
V0-
3It
.m
`-4
4.1
0to
lM
0=
rr= 1.
4' 4
m rt
rr rrr
0 1111
ism
ma
sou
rn c 3Iii
Iin
-A: ETRost
Caltiornis liolycenthl.te State Duivtrs.t.trS.ut Lots 01;lepo. (7411.iforult.
CaP.):EK 1:110CA NON. volt:zr.tiO?June 26 10, 1971
tv14qatioh SuAmnr---Csr(ter Edvcttrion TAa!,, Forte Preumadtion. Jt.cs 25, 27
I I 1 Th." topic oe "CaretIrldi.ention" is timely end appraprints f6rF-1 1-0-1I 501 '.,.....1
a serkJhop 'of this type.-
I -,:t uo I
1 .-,-,2, This trat,fesshop to.t..1' (1) .-tart? rtthioved Us ptytioite, (2) st:tiewtaI .
..........1,
I I 8 ! 11-; 141,.
3J..........
., .. .it only tacdoTately, (3) hJe not achieved Its purv...3se.
In \-.,:- I., 3--k'
.
.1 I.,. ..(.:.:41k* i.,
..1/..T.hq) tOttir,c.ti for the i(zorkthol: (1) sags wt11 ort;:fra",'..t.,,:- In tt.,.17-1.fl of! I ' i 1 i IV5 171.1Vpf.,y,.*: apt'. At:: nigh CAexouth, (2) via. iFat. ',tit it 44c,,,,O.d hAve, .
..........,
1(It...,
I 291 110:,.
.... 3bemill orgurntzcatbvtlir, 0) VAS poorly ors.lftired,
, !
1C . -
-, ---I
.
4, 'fluhA dtirs(tol of the watItshopt (I) vas abott right., !2) =ri'. elInt.--1 1-1 vttv petw,d, (J) less tit4.4.1 14149 niNededq (.,124. 1 ni.. :
.2.1i i .) t .......:
*).
i...)3
1
i Th. Isefnednlc- of .-letts.-Itien utl: (1) tot.* LItht, si... Cc* ".0.000.1
-- (I) Jost .4tbo1/41t.ri3hc.
:II125.%....... ..*)
1-71
.-i--
1"-
;16;
lu this workshop, **well sts lit and tzs.0.1 grcitr)tligliSelous by ttto 'tar r,s1. u9z,4 : for-Lf.voly., (2) .....hat
I filei Vt1y, (3) .poor i.y.,
I I 1
' ....'"".. ----t,
1 381 . Isl.,,1
1. ''1%t, vorkbhop aetivittes %were gr.;utrstly: (.) stitule leg, (.") 111xndit: terms of thttir impiA.C. (3) borir.g.
1.4.' ,....4s
/ I
,.. i
1
I .
S. (eners,:t!%,. ct...! vorlcshop a4:t.tvi:.les oz.r.4!: ,l) most 4:1plul,
IC I t-'-'1--------"1-2I iiii'istu: k zi A lifIret 4 ii), .9itt: rofil:y he:!;41.11..
I
1...
65C.
fe
4
1
112SONNEL
2 3,
32 E
2 .3
Svaluittimajamr=glatridlcation Task Force ?mitigation-_------
Pass 2
9. Haw welldid the workshop participants contribute toward the'achievemiltn of the purpose of the work hop? (1) very well,(2).sorsighat well, 3) foorly. .
. . 1
10. How-do you rate the effectiveness of the workshop consultants ?((1) highly effective, (2) effective,. (3) not effective,
. .,
11. -What did 'you-like most *out-the-Task-Force puss-aim-tont
/116 AMP
12._ What did you like least about the Task Force presentation?
ti
66
a
111 Os. .11
YEN.//,; 11111111M
-
1 40
1
49
'3
:i s
E17 3
;11 [1
1 2 3
."12i rz]
\I -2' 3 4
3
11.1.2ILDI". 2 3
Fl")1 7 2 3
I0
Calioznia Polyw.lmic 14dversitir
let Luis Obispo, Gm]
aFSRIENCE HUVTATIVN WOkSHYJP
Ategus 71-75; %972
A, P11:1SE
ri
1, This workshop has: (:. c..errly schievedits purposs,(2) achieved it only modiwately, (3) hss.not achievedits purpose, .
2, The subject "Related InarlsctioWeis tively andtappeopriate'/for a workshop of this type.
Coamientel.
1111111111111M.
It. ACITICA
lob
wrawigsaws.....4.1.11000.11..=.=1111=1. 'me. agenda for this workshop: (1) was well organized in
teems of its puipose and Lts time elements, (2) was finebut it could have been ortonfted better, (3) was poorlyorganized,
'
2. Thi duration of the workshop: (1) was about right, (2) moretime vas. ieeded, (A). less Mae was needed.
3, the time.schedule-forthe workshop should be: (1) in the.norninv, (2) in the aftert.orpa,(3) duripg both marningsand afternoons with a ,"frce" day, (4) in the morning withspeceal events in the ofttrmlocs? (5) in the afternoons with*:Ipecial, events in the Worrino,
COOM401$1INOMAIMME/.1~1
,......11011. ONION OM111111111MI.,
C. ACT1AT/ES I.
le '23r. workshop activities were generally: (1) stimulat104..(2) mi4o1 in terms of their ?Impact, (3) boring..
1, i:prefer workshop activities that: (1) emphasize smalli,roup settings, (2) provide uore individualized /involvement,(3) emplint7f.. Icage group pr,Isenratioas,
.
&4WV.:0: ,, ,IMANNIMMOMmemiIMEMOr
,... l e . r w. ,Ot 0. Wfl 4,41 IMO MIMr..116AY
Olno.v1, MIMI% I. 11.0111 ..011/.... illow1.
.S.
'Cl
1
1
O
1. , Diu ideal physical faciliti T9 for this- workshop:
(3.) were abouL_right 4A we ha.: on li:rle mectiog molt
IYILJit adOrating rooms aviila'alf!, (2) 1 ?refer-a largeroom *rich tables to provide for small aroops in 'Of samelocation, (3) have all activie.tes ins theater type.' room,
() one large lecture room vi*.h smslle: rooms coot:I:talon:table for group activities.
CtAsoents:
.......**....,*
'N mud IIIKL
- ammo...nom.0
4
. , A .,
1. Blowoutd ybu rateithe presIntatioas by, Slienco And Aver0.1?
1 2 3
M1 2 3
011,,anizotion
De:1ivery
Al4propv.steness fortLis wori.fhop
14:weriai:s used ,
Poor
I rINN11...
Pair Good
Mai ml
1.2
Ent n 1 Lent
I
--;L
.2. W'' well did the workshop peer centers c,,ntrihme tat hc
'at 'tieven+ of the purpese 31 he ttrole..tilop? '(1) ve,lry wt,11,
eamokhat well, (3) poorly
'3. Map do ylu, rate the eftectipAless of the work,hop ,pro:viccra?
(highlT eliicEive, (2) effective, TJ) not a:'e4tve.*
MATEXALS
1. 71 el materibli Alstributed a: !his wo...411hop: (1) Jir".. o' value to me, (2) we may Hit sows; of the matt.A.!,t11 in
i 6 nr dist:let: (3) car plans ire a1rea41, sot. Cc WI itC4.
4tut! materials from thie wor WI op, (4) Greed can
hmIlly'vstt .
Cements,..m.mVma,mraso.*.mmwomlmwoommmmrmammlimvmlameomvvmo.l.m.w.e0m..mmmWmmAmemm.Vwlwm.,
V01 . ./-2-
68
P111141= "N. olomDe r11
r.
a
002 3 4
ert
G. vti.str..Ts
1. As a iecult of this worksho': (WI nyv have addltioaalinformation that will enable re to prm ide 210tdrelated instruction, (2) I nowainitiste R program ofquality related instiuction, (3) the workshop Will notaffect my program to- achy groat extent, (4). I now have the
ILformatIon I need to impro0 my'sehcols' program, but ,
Cc?Imentc:
2. Whet dietyou like most about: the Related InatructioaWeTI.6hop?
111 4444mmormarm hmi.44.4
VO:41144{. fa
3, Wt-It did you like twist aho:it the Relsti InsructlemWkIkchop?
IMMO.
Stri 1111411
4
J.
*
41.144 /11, 11111111111IMMINI.
.3-
, 69
I
I
51 V
INSTRUCTORS' ADDRESSES
AVERILL, Donald F.Direcpor,-Care'er Iducation
Huntington Beach Union High School District1092 -1 17th.Street-:
. I
Huntington Beach, CA 92648(714)!536-9331 ext. 239
; BARICHj , George W. /
Director, Work Experience EducationRedlands Unified School District33 West Lugonia AvenueP.O. Box 1008Redla'ds, CA 92373
I
.(714) 792-1178
BRINKERHOFF, Bud
I
CoOrdinator, Occupational:1 Education
Acalanes Union High Sch ol District;
1212 Pleasant Hill RoadLafayette, CA 94549(415)1935-2800
BRUBACER, Dwayne L.Superyisor) Work Experilence EducationLosAngeles City School450 N4 Grand Avenue, Rom H-236Los Angeles, CA 90054(213)687-4636-
FLINT,] Alvin
Seciallist, work Experien e EducationSan Juan Unified School Di trict3738 Walnut AvenueCarmichael, CA 95608(916) 484 -2176
FLORA, 1Iaurice R.
Coordinator, Work Experience ducationCharter Oak Unified'Ilqchool Di trict20240-C enega AvenueCharter Oak, CA 91722(213) 96-8331
GARCIA, lbert (Pinky)
-Coordin4or, Work ExperienceSequoia High SchOolBroadway and BrewsterRedwood dity, CA 94063(415)365-11871
Edu ationi
IJ
GILLMORE, Vern (Dr.)
liege of San Mateo17b0 West Hillsdale Blvd.San Mateo, CA 94402(415) 574-6422
MAYO, James B.Coordinator, WorkFremont-UniA0775
Experience Educationfied School District
Fremont Blvd.Fremont, CA 94538-
(415) 657-1865
MENKE, RobertDirector, Vocational EducationSan Diego City Schools4100 Normal Street.San Diego, CA 92103(714) 298-4681 ext. 489
MURASKI, EdwardDistrict CoordinatorRio Hondo Community College3600 Workman Mill RoadWhittier, CA 90608(213) 692-0921 ext. 241
OLSEN, JohnCoordinator, Work Experience EducationShasta Union High School District725 Cypress AvenueRedding, CA 96001(916) 241-3261
RAGAN, DenisRedwood High SchoolDoherty DriveLarkspur, CA 94939(415) 924-6200
RAY, GordonDirector of Vocational EducationSalinas Union High School431, West Alisal Street
Salinas, CA 93901(408) 422-4703
REYNOLDS, JackSacramento City Unified School District163:9 N Street
P.O. Box 2271Sacramento, CA 95810
71
-2-
SOVEL, WilliamSan Mateo Union High650 N. Delaware St.San Mateo, CA 94401(415)347-3031
Capuchino High SchoolSchool District 1501 Magnolia Dr.
San Bruno, CA 94066CALL HERE: (415) 588-4276
SPENCE, NorvinSupervisor, Work Experience Education426 Locust St.Modesto, CA 95351(209) 523 -1851
EVALUATORS:
POOLE, RobertP.O. Box 682Los Altos, CA 94022(415) 948-2768
THELE, TonyDirector, Work Experience Education & PlacementEl Camino College16007 Crenshaw Blvd.Via Torrance, CA 90506(213) 324-6631 ext. 265
72
P
APPENDIX H
QUARTERLY REPORT
October 1 - December 31, 1972-
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT SERIES FOR WORK EXPERIENCE EDUCATION
.
Project #40-30569 EFO 39-73r
An Education Professions Development Act:Project
and
Project #40-30569 B-3-230 .
A Vocational Education Section Part B Project
California Polytechnic State University
.San Luis Obispo, California
4
Kinsey Tanner, Director
Distributed to:.
.
1r. James BecketE. David Graf*
Allan }Wines'Dr. Dale AndrewsDr. Howard BoroughsDr. Carl CumminsDr. Walter-`SchroederDr. Don MorrisRobert Poole
,Tony Thele.
4'
,e0V
/
73
I. PLANNING
1. Theare
Th
1
description of objectives of the.project as stated in the contract
as follows:
is project is designed to encompass eight basic objectives:
.1. Conduct a summer workshopAgesigned to t'amiliarize educatorswith concepts of career edUcation and.their "relationships withWork experience education.
.
1.2. Conduct a summer workshop designed.to familiarize work experienceeducation personnel with materials and'methods for conductingrelated instruction classes.
1.3. Train eight instructors who will present to participants of themanagement courses, the strong philosophical and educationalreasons why goals ana objectives are needed for work experiqnce
education.
1.4. Conduct instructor training workshops to 'train teachers of the
courses the concepts of career education.1.5. Present ten (10) graduate-level extension courses (5 in the fall
and 5 in the spring) entitled "Work Experience Iducation -Implementation" and "Work Experience Education - Operational..Tnese courses to be offered in five locations throughout, the state.The 250 students attending will earn 22 quarter units of graduate
credit for each class. (Twenty -five hours of instruction per
class.)1.6. Present eleven (11) graduate level extension courses (5 in the
401 and 6 in the spring) entitled, "W. 'Experience Education -Aanogement" at.eleven dfTferent location for 300 participants.Pasticipants will be selected from those who have previouslyattended the beginning courses and/or are responsible for
administrative functions. Participants will recei'Ve three quarter
units of;credit. (Thirty hours of instrudtion.) -
1.7. Present Etiree (3) graduate level extension courses (1 in the falland 2 in the spring) entitled, "Work Experience Education - In the
Community Collo4." these courses will be'offered in threelocations} throughout the state. The 75 participants seledtedto attend will earn three quater units of graduate credit.(Thirty hours of instruction.)
1.8. ProVide in all four courses .a unit(s) in career education concepts,as they relate to work experience education and to state and .national educational priority.
2. The courses offered are as follow:
Ed-E-581-05 - Work Exfierierce Education - Implementation; for ,first and
second yar work experience coordinators; types of work experlence programsand methods of implementing ay work experience progiam as a Part of the
tot']. curriculum (no prerequisite). t
Ed -E- 581 -O.6 - Work Experiende iEducaion - Operation.; given in spring to
follow Ed-E-581-05; labor cellos, funding, public rg ations, relatedinstruction, education and administrative codes prerequisiee Ed -E -544
EdE\ -581-06 or permission'f instructor).
7 4
EdrE-581-07 - Work Experience Education - Management; for experiencedcoordinators and administrators; accountability, financing and managementtheories fof work experience education.'
Ed-E-581-08 - Work Experience Education - Community College; for workexpefience coordinators and cooperative education teachers at.commmnitycolleges'; development and operation procedures for work experienceprograms in the community colleges; accountability, education andadministrative codes, State Plan for Vocational Education in thercommunity
.colleges.
3. The time schedule for objectives of the prgject as stated in the contractare as follows:
OBJECTIVES MET:
1. Summer workshop (Career Education)2. Planning meeting3. Sumner workshop (Materials for Related Instruction).
6/26-30/727/15-16
8/21-24'4. Extension course'teacher planning session (1.7-7)... . 8/21-245. Extension course teacher planning session (1.7-5)... . 8/21-246. Extension course teacher planning session (1.7-6)... . 8/28-307. Selection of participants 9/1-158. Courses to be offered .(1 night per week -8 weeks
1.7-5) 10/2-12/19. Courses to be offered (1 night per week -10 weeks
1.7-7, 1.7 -6) 10/2-12/1410. Planning and evaluation meeting (1.7-5) 12/9
OBJECTIVES PLANNED FOR:
11. Planning.and evaluation meeting (1.7-6) 1/6/7312. Planning and evaluation meeting (1.7-7) 1/1313. Courses to be offered (1 night per week -8 weeks
1.7-5) 2/12-4/1314. Courses to be offered (1, night per week -10 weeks
1.7-6, 1.7-7) 2/12-4/2615. Evaluation meeting with course instructors (1.7-5) 4/2816. Evaluation meeting with course instructors (1.7-6) 5/5
17. Evaluation meeting with course instructors (1.7-7) 5/12
18. Evaluation report 5/28
PARTICIPANT SELECTION
1. The driteria for seledtion'and the type of participants as stated in theproject are as follows:
Participants will be selected from thoge educators that have demonstratedknowledge and/or interest in work-experience education. Selection ofteacher-trainers will be conducted by the project director with assistancefrom the California State Consultant for Work Experience Education, andthe head of the Education Department, California Polytechnic StateUniversity.
44.1
75
I
Those who will attend the in-service training programs will beselected by county and school directors of vocational education'in the immediate area being served by these courses.
745 persons will participate in the project. Participation will
be as follows:
1
1. 120 educators will attend the summer workshops at Cal Poly,
. San Luis Obispo.' ,
,
-
2. 250 new coordinators will be selected to attend the in-serviceimplementation and operational courses offered in Indio, Pomona,Stockton, San Diego and LosiAngeles.
3. 300 coordinatos, vocational education administrators, counselors
v etc. will be selected to attend the in-service management courseoffered\in Fresno, Modestdc Sacramento, 'Los Angeles, San%Mateo,Marin County, Redding, San Diego, Long Beach, San Luis Obispo
.
and Salinas..
4. 75 cotrnunity college coordinators and vocational personnel willbe selected to attend the in-service community college courseoffered in San-Mateo, Huntington Beach and Pasadena.
Special_emphasis will be given to the selection of participants incontinuation education and special education.
2. Total applications received to date include 138 who enrolled Sn workshopsas reported in the fall report. The fall series bf courses enrolled210 educatord.
Courses were offered in the following locations:
. "Work Experience Education - Implemedtatidh"Ed -E- 581 -05. Enrollment' /-
Indio 8
Selma 19
Los Angeles -11
San Francisco 16
Sacramento 16
1
"Work Experience Xducation - Management"-Ed-E-581-07 Enrollment
West Covina 12
Salinas 24
Modesto 38
Lafayette 11-San Jose 16
*Ventura 19
"Work Experience Education - Commdnity College"Ed-E-581-08,Enrollment
Los Altos 11
Whittier 9 .
(See appendix A for geographic breakdown of participants)
* Course.started 11/1/72, will bel complete 1/10/73
76
II1:4
II OPERATION
The breakdown by position was:
"Work Experience Education - Implementation"
67% were directly involved with Work Experience Education377. were directly involved in Vocational EdUcatiOn337. hope to move into Work Experience Education
"Work Experience Education - Management"
.66% were directly involved with Work Experience Education45% were directly involved in Vocational Education30% hope to move iDto 'Work Experience Education
"Work Experience. Education - Community College"
92%1 were, directly involved with Work Experience Education357. were directly involved in Vocational Education
.
.01. The stated objectives and time schedule for the project have been met
to dat.e. All factors considered indicate the fall. series of classeswas very successful. 4Both interim evaluation reiiorts (included.asAppendices B & C) shaii a high caliber of instruction by the variousinstructors., The average ,post-test score was 85%, showing a gain of16.557° over the pre -test. Perhaps, most indicative of participantevaluation, 92% Of the subjective evaluations returned said theywould like to participate in future in- service programs. 010.
To date, 348 of the anticipated 745 participants have enrolled. Theenrollment in the fall series of classes smaller than expected.However, the high percentage (657) of the participants directly involvedin Work Experience Education indicates the courses were relevant to needs.
Publicity information fliers were printed and distributed for each classin the spring series. (Samples included as Appendix D.)
2. Planning and evaluation meetings will be held with all instructors andproject evaluators January 6, 1973 in Southern California and January 13,1973 in Northern California. At thgse meetings we will review 'esults ofthe fall series of classes and plan for the spring series which will startthe week of February 12, 1973; Enrollment and reference materials will bedistributed at the meetings.
With- carryover funds from 1971-72 we will be able to add two extra classes.A "Work Experience Education - Management" class has been arranged on theCal Poly Campus at San Luis Obispo with S. A. Price, Vocational Coordinatorof San Luis Coastal Unified as instructor.
?
1
As *usual, the cooperation and performance of the Cal Poly Staff has beenexcellent through the year.
77
1
II
1
1
1
1
I
'APPENDIX A
GEOGRAPHICAL BREAKDOWN
-"WorkiExperience Education - Imgementation"
Ed -E -581 -05
\ ,
LOCATION -- # ENROLLED
r . . '''
LOdATION
t
# ENROLLED
INDIO -
.
)
, SAN FRANCISCO
Indio 3 San Francisco 5
Rialto 1 .. Penngrove 1
Calexico . 2 $ Pleasanton 1
El Centro- 1 Lafayette 1
La Quidta 1 4San Rafael 1
Livermore 1
Belmonti
A.
SELMA San Leandtoil
1
A Richmond. .. 1 '4*
Fresno 9 Healdsburg 11
Dinuba .. 2 Santa Rosa. ,;: 1
'Lemoore 4 1
HanfordCorcoran
I
-1
1 _.,
SACRAMENTO :,!,4'.>
.
Riverdale 1
Visalia 1- Sacramdnto , 4
Tulare 2 City Heights 1
LOS ANGELES. -
Los Angeles.
Arcadia ,
InglewoodLong Beach.'
MontebelloSan GabrielCarson
Atmk
5
1
1
1
,1-
1
1 %
.*4
Carmichael '
Lodi , '2
Elk Grove 2
Penryn . 1.Lincoln 2
Woodland 1 i
Dixon 1
7 8(
e
'
1
1.
1
APPENDIX A - (Continued)
GEOGRAPHICAL BREAKDOWN- -----------
-"Work Experience EducatiOn
Ed-E-581-07
Management"
LOCATION\'
itENROLLED LOCATION -" # ENROLLED
WEST COVINA SALINAS
Duarte . 1 Salinas 17Colton 1 Santa Cruz 2
Fullerton 2 Monterey 1
Covina, 1 San Martin 1
Laverne 1 Oakland 1
South Pasadena . t 1 Gonzales' 1
San--Dimas 1. Ben Lomond 1
Orange' 1 .
West Covina "\...1 ,*
Glendora 1 WAYETTE
Fairfield 3
MODESTO. 1
, Alamo 1 .
..... P'easant .Hill 1
Modesto 24 , Walnut Creek. -1Ripon 1 '1 Vallejo .1
'Tracy 2 Napa l,1
Oakdale 1 Walnut Creek 1
Denair 1
Ceres 2 g .
Sonora 1 CUPERTIN0Turlock 1.
M4Aecd 1 Newark 1
Los Banos 1 Santa Clara l'
Livingston ' 1 San Jose 7
ivertank 1 . ,- Sunnyvale 1
' Palo Alto . 1
San Mateo 1
Redwood City 1
79
I.
044
ApPENDFIX-1= (Continued)
GEOGRAPHICAL BREAKDOWN
"Work Experience Education - Com4nity College"
Ed- E- 581 -08
LOCATION # ENROLLED LOCATION # ENROLLED
LOS ALTOS
San Jo se
Los Ga, tos
arat oga
unnyv ale
st er City_
5
1
2
1
-1_
WHITTIER
WalnutWhittier ,
AlhambraAlta 'Loma
TorranceFullertonLaHabra
, 1
1
1
2
1
1.
1
TO
40'
0
\\
80a
1.0
APPENDIX I
QUARTERLY REPORT
January 1, 1973 '....March 310973t .
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT SERIES FOR WORK EXPERIENCE EDUCATION
Project.#40-30569 EFO 39-73
An Education Professions Development Act Project
and
'Project #40-30569 B-3-230
.A Vocational Education Section Part B ltoject
California Polytechnic State University
San Luis Obispo, California
'Kinsey Tanner, Director
Distributed to:
Dr. James BecketE. David GrafAllan HolmesDr. Dale AndrewsDr. Howard Boroughs ,
Dt. Carl CumminsDr. Walter,Schroeder
Dr. Don 1,ioiris
Robert PooleTony ThAe
81
I.. PLANNING
1. The deare a
This
1.
scription of objectives of the project,as stated in the contracts follows:
project is designed to encompass, eight basic objectives:
`Conduct a summer workshop designed to familiarize educatorswith concepts of Career Education and their relationships withWork Experience Education.
2 Conduct a summer workshop designed to familiarize Work ExperienceEducation personnel with'aterials and Methods for conducting'related instruction classes.
.3 Train_eight instructors who will present to participants of themanagement courses, the .strong philosophical and educationalreasons why goals and ,objectives are needed for Work ExperienceEducation.
1.4 Conduct instructor training workshops to train teachers of thecourses the concepts of Career Education.
1.5 Present ten (10) graduate level extension courses (5 in the; falland 5 in the spring) entitled "Work Experience Education -
Implementation" and "Work Experience Education - Operational."These courses to be offered in five locations throughout the stote.The 250 students 'attending will earn 23/4 quarter units of graduatscredit for each class. (Twenty -five hours of instruction perClass.)
1.6 Present eleven (11) graduate level extension courses (5 in the'fall andi6 in the spring)._entitled, "Work Experience Education -
Management" at eleven diffeient locations for 300 participants.Participants will be selected from those who have previouslyattended the begipping'courSes and/or are responsible foradministrative functions. Participants will receive three quarterunits of credit. (Thirty hours of instruction.)
1.7 Present three (3) graduate,level extension courses (1 in the falland.2 in the spring) entitled, "Work Experience Education - In theCommunity College." These courses will be offered in three locationsthroughout the state. The 75 participants selected to attend 4
will earn three quarter units.of gradudee credit.(Thirty hours of instruction.)
143 Provide in all four courses a unit(s) in Career. Education conceptsas they relate to Work Experience Education and to state andnational educational priority.
.
2. The courses offered are as follows:
Ed-E-581-05 -: Work Experience Education - Implementation; for first andsecond year Work Experience coOrdinators; types of Work Experienceprograms and methods of implementing a Work Experience program as apart of the total curriculum (no prerequisite).
Ed-E-581-06 - Work Experience Educat,ion - Operation; given in sihi g tofollow Ed-E-581-05; labor codes, funding, public relations, relate 'instruction, education and administrative codes, (prerequisite Ed-E-544or Ed-E-581-06 or permission of instructor).
- 82
'I.4
Ed-E-581-07 - Work Experience Education - Managem,..:r; fOr experiencedcoordinators and' administrators; accountability, financing and managementtheories for Work Experience Education.
tEd-E-581--U8 - Work Experience Education - Community College; for WorkExperience coodinators end cooperative education teachers at communitycolleges; development and operation procedures for Work Experienceprograms in the ccmmunity colleges; accountability, edOcation andadministrative,codes, State Plan for Vocational Education in the cokmunity
colleges.
3. The timetschedule forare cs follows:
OBJECTIVES MET;
objectives of the project as stated in the contract
1. Summer workshop Career Education)
2. '-'.;Planning -meeting
3. .Summer workshop (Materials for Related Instructidn)4. .'!'Extension course teacher planning session (1.7-7)
5. Extension- course teacher planning session (1.7-5) .
6. Extension course teacher planning session (1.7-6)
7. Selection of Participants8, Courses to be offered.(1, night per week -8 weeks
1.7-5)
9. Cour\ ses to be' offered (1 ntght pe k -10 weeks'
6/26-30/727/15-168/21-24
8/21-248/21-24
8/21-249/1-15
10/2-12/1
1.7-7, 1.7-6) 10/2-12/14
10. Planning and evaluation meeting (1. -5) 12/9
11. Planning and evaluation meeting 1/6/73
12. platoing ;and evaluation meeting (1.7-7) 1/13
'13. -Courses to be offered (L night pet week -8 weeks1:7-5) 2/12-4/1::
14.' Courses to be offered (1 night-per week -10 weeks1.7-6, 1.7 -7,)
iNikit"3-711t1ITTED-FOR:
2/12-4/26
.
15, Evaluation meeting with Course instructors (1.7-5). 4/28
Tfi. meeting with-cOttr.se instructors (1.7-6). 5/5
17. Evaluation meeting with course instructors'Evaluation (1.7-7). 5/12
18. Evaluation report 5/28
II. PARTICIPANT SELECTION
1. The criteria for selection and the type of participants as stated in the
project are as follows:
1
Participants will be selected from those educators that have demonstrated
knowledge and/o interest in Work Experience Education. Selection of
"teacher-trainers will be conducted by the project director with assistancefrom the California State Consultant for Work Experience Education and
the Head of the Education Department, California "2olyiechnic State
Univers'ity.
83
I
1
Those who will, attend the in-service taining programs will beselected by county and school dir'Ltors\of Vocational Educationin the immediate area being served by th se courses.
745 persons will participate in die projebe as follows:
1. 120 educators will attend the summer workshops at Cal Poly,San Luis Obispo. / 4
2. 250 new coordinators will be elected to attend the in- serviceimplementation and operational courses offered in Indio, Pomona,Stockton, San Diego and Los Angeles.
3. 300 coordinators, Vocational Education administrators, counselorsetc. will*be selected to attend the in- service management courseoffered in Fresno, Modesto, Sacramento, Los Angeles, San Mateo,Marin County, Redding, San Diego, Long Beach, San Luis Obispoand Salinas.
4. 75 community college coordinators and vocational personnel willbe selected to attend the in-service community college courseoffered in San Mateo, Huntington Beach and Pasadena.
1pecial emphasis will, be sivento the-,selection of participants in
cbntinuation education and special education.
2. Total app4cations received to date include 138 the workshops and210 in the fall series as reported in previous reports.
Courses starting the weekOf February 12, 1973 are operative itthe following locations with enrollments shown for each location.
"Work Experience Education - Operation"Ed-E-581,06 Enrollment
. Participation will
J
3
Indio 10
Selna, 19
Los Angeles 14
San Francisco 16
Satramento 19
Total 78
"Work Expirience Education - Management"
* Started 3/6/73
td-E-581-07 Enrollment
*Fresno 14
Redding 20
Sacramento 15
San Diego .33
San.Francisco .24
14Torrance
Total 120
84
c
c
1 s
III. OPERATION
"Work Experience Education - .Community College"Ed-E-581-08 Enrollment
Hayward 13
Total 13
The stated objectives and time schedule as shown in the project have been
met to date.
Planning and evaluationmeetings were held January 6, 1973 in SouthernCalifornia and January 13, 1973 in Northern California., All instructorsmet with the director and the two project. evaluators. The interim evaluation
and subjective reports were presented by the, two evaluators. (See Quarterly
Report - October 1, n72 December 31, 1972.) On the basis of these reports,
some changes in the spring series werezmade.
Indications are the spring series of courses will be successful. All
instructors report very regular attendance by participants. This would
indicate a high degree of relevancy of the instruction. The classes
visited by the two evaluators and the.director evidence a high degree ofinterest and class participation..
With 348 participants reported in previous (reports and 211 participantsenrolled in the spring series the total, for the year will be 559 people.
Evaluative information is not available at the time of this report as the
spring series will not finish until late April. This data will:be included,
in the final report in June. (Participant Data Summary OE Form7214 is
included for the spring classes as Appendix 11.)
Evaluation meetings with the instructors and evaluators will be scheduled
for late April or early May. At these meetings we will review the courseoutlines, evaluation instruments and reference materials for possible
revision and' improvement for future use.
The cooperation and performance of the California Polytechnic StateUniversity staff has been outstanding through the entire project.
85
7 7,
ta
S
4
APPENDIX A
GEOGRAPHICAL BREAKDOWN
"Work Experience Education - Operation"
2
LOCATION # ENRWED
INDIO
Calexico 2
Indio 9
SELMA /I
Clovis 1
Fresno 2
:Hanford 1 '
Laton - 1
Lemoore 4 ' 1
Reedley 1
Tulare % 2
Visalia 1 1 -
LOS ANGELES
Arcadia 1
Camatilio 1
..../XerMosa Beach
Long Beach 1
Montebello 1,
RosemeadSan Gabriel .1
Sunland %
Via Torrance
1
Los Angeles6V4
. 5
I
Ed-E-581-06
lb
86
LOCATION
r
# ENROLLED
SAN FRANCISCO
Concord , 3
Daly City 1
Fremont 1
Lafayette 1Livermore. 1
O akland' 1
Pittsburg 1 "
San Francisco 1
San Leandr 1
San Mateo 1
Santa Rosa 1
Stoakton ' 1
Walnut Creek 1
SACRAMENTO
Carmichael 3
City Heights 1
Dixon,
Fresno.
11
. 1
Lincoln 1Lodi
.2 .
Modesto 1
Orangevale 1
Sacramento 7
Sutter Cieek I.
Woodland 1
a -r
LOCATION
FRESNO
[Cardthers,
ChowchillaCoalingaFresnoHanfordMaderaModestoSanger
Tulare-Visalia.
ti
APPENDIX A - (Continued)
.GEOGRAPHICAL BREAKDOWN
"Work Experience Education - Management"
Ed-E-581-07
# ENROLLED-.
2
1
1
4
SACRAMENTONTO .
Davis 1
Galt 1
Redding` 1
Sacramento 9
Woodland 1.
SAN DIEGO
Calexico .1
La Mesa -.?,,
El. Caj9n 2'
Escondido i 2
Coronado 1
pa Jolla . 1
Vista . 1
San Diego 19
LOCATION # ENROLLED
REDDING
.
-AndersonButte City 1
-Cottonwood 1
punsmuir 1
Hayford 3
tewipton 1
111. Millville 1
`Redding .
-8
Weaverville 1
.SAN FRANCISCO
.. , .
,
.Alameda- - -
Berkeley1
1
'Concord,4.
1
.- Corte Madera 1
.Kentfield 1
Oakland . 2.
Pennerdye 1
Petaluma' 1
Pleasanton , 1
San Francisco 5
FreMOt 1Alamo .1
0 . San Rafael 1
San MateO. 1
;4alnut Creek v1
. Woodside 1
South San Francisco 1 --. , San Leandro 1, 1'
San Anselmo 1 Y
Chula Vista" 3 9 ,
A
81
APPENDIX A - (ContinOe4)
GEOGRAPHICAL BREAKDOWN '
"Work-Experience Education - Management" -,(Continued)
4
Cl
LOCATION'
t
Ed-E-581-07
# ENROLLED
TORRANCE
CamarilloEl SegundoHuntington BeachLos AlamitosLong'BeachMarina.Del ReyResedaSanta MonicaSan Pedro
TorranceVia Torrance
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
884
SP
APPENDIX A
GEOGRAPHICAL
(Continued)
BREAKDOWN
"Work Experience Education - Community College"
Ed -E- 581 -08
ATION # ENROLLED
ARD
11Be keley 1
CopcordFrvmont 1
'Halvard 1
011and 3
P1 asant'aill 1
S
J
4,
2
4'
I
0
44
1
1
1
1
AY11.110.1i B
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH., EDUCATION, ANO WELFAREOFFICE OF EDUCATION
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20202
PARTICIPANT DATA 'SUMMARY(Paris C, 1:0; and F, Education Professions Development Act
'Title V, P.1. 9-329, as emended)
BUDGET BUREAU NO. 11.140752APPROVAL EXPIRES: 10/31/71
1. OE PROJECT NUMBER
2 NAME OF SPONSORING INSTITUTION OR AGENCY
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
3. STATE
California
4... NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS TO BE TRAINED IN THEPROJECT
b. HUMMER OR PARTICIPANTS COVERED BY THIS SUMMARYfREPORT .
' 207
DATA ON PARTICIPANTS
S. SEX 6. AGEIS
ii SO-54 32
7. PARTICIPANTS BY WHETHER ORNOT THEY ARE VIETNAM ERAVETERANSa. ender 25 4 d. 3549 38
a. Male 150 .25-23 26 .. 40-44 37 h. 55.53 16 a vitamim wei yetorons 18. b. Fornal 51 c, 30.34 25 f. ism 23 i. 110 and over 5 b. Not Vietnam era veterans 140
a. RACIAL OR ETHNIC BACKGROUND. .
S. PARTICIPANTS BY WHETHER THEIR INCOMES ARE. ORWERE BEFORE THEY ENROLLED IN THIS PROJECT..0BELOW THE POVERTY LINE
6. Below poverty lino 5
a. Negro air black 16 d. American Indian 4
4b. Puerto Rican 0 e. Oriental
. C. MordearrAmerican f. Other thank. above 169 b: Not below poverty line 187
10. GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF PARTICIPANTS (by Stale of employment prior fa his 'Weer)
a. Ala. 0 k, G. tr. Md. 1 MI. N. J. 0 as. s. C. 0 ay. Wyo. 0b. Alaska 1 I. Howell 0 iv. Maio. 0 al. N. M. 0 .P. S. D. 0 as. Canal Zone 0e. Ariz. 0 m. Idaho 1 w. Mich. 0 as. N. T. 0 . art. Teen. 0 be. Guam. 0d. Ark. - 0 n. Iliinela 0 c. Minn. , 0 ah. N. C. 0 ar. Tema. (yr bb. Puerto Rico 0a. Cal. 197 ..11;cum. 0 Y. Mies. 0 al. N. D. 0 ao. Utah 0 be. Virgin la. . 0f. Colo. 0 p. lows 0 c. m.. 0 61,ohic 1 ot. Vt. 0 bd. Pacific Trust
rtTerrorie 011. Conn. 0 si. Kansas 1 as. Mont 0 ak.Olda. 0 au. Va. 0h. Dot. 0 r. KY. 0 ob. Nebr. al. Oreg. iv. Walt. 1 be. Over Dep.
Schools 4
Tbf. Foreign0
1 0 .
I. D. C. 0 0.12' 00
ac. Nevada
ad. N. H.
00
am. Pa.
on. R. I.
00
ay.,. W..Vo. 0as. Wise.0J. Fla. 0 t. Mains ,
HIGHEST DEGREE EARNED_
a. NONE
0
b. A. S. OIPLOM A
4
e. BACHELOR'S 4. MASTER'S
85
12. OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND
f. PH: D.(
1
v.
a. Currently employed (or within the past S year,employed) In the field of education 200
4. Never prevIrrualy employed in the field of 'education
by whether they werer
b. Proviualy employed in the field of educetion.but not within the peat 5 y ears 4
I. toiptcyad In other profeaelona.roe uirtet e owacademic delve* ; I . 3
e. Navel pa tviouely employed in the field ofodUcatIon r 2
3..Holding on SCIlldrIC degree but not working 03. Not heir/An( an academe degree 0
IS. TOTAL YEARS. OF TEACHING OR OTHER EMPLOYMENT IN THE FIELD OF EDUCATION
a. NONE b. 1-4 YEARS t. S9 YEARS d. 1014 YEARS a. 1515 YEARS f. 20 OR MORE
4 36 60 42 31
14. PRIMARY POSITION OR EMPLOYMENT STATUS AT PRESENT, OR IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO PROJECT
IN A PRESCHOOL. ELEMENTARY-OR SECONDARY SCHOOL OR
SCHOOLS. OR LOCAL EDUCATION AGENCY
b. OTHERWISE EMPLOYED
I. Teacher trainer (On Inset.Wien el hidher education)
1. teachart 140 S. Inetruational media (Incl. librarians) 02. Administrator . 6. Education aide or poraprofeasional 1. In State edue. agency
3. Supervisor 17. 7..3chool volunteer 0 Horeeducetron position
4. Student4. Pupil personnel aptelaliat 12 a. Other education position
OE FORA 72ri, 6/70 REPLACES OE FORM 7214. VIE WHICH IS OBSOLETE.
9
DATA ON SCHOOLS OF PARTICIPANTSA
(NOTE. Ettely(llute tato each al ow (o/funts Now. (11, 14.7. IL Ifs. 155. live.11111.1 1g.) dear the autallor of pilule/pants who here beer.
slootitete on item 14e. loy the category In meat now which beet direerlbee the nature of (hely school.. Eicher. prticlortel cieeellied in tier is' )
13. SCHOOL OR SYSTEM,
BY CONTR.:Pi.
16. GRADE LEVELS WITH WHICH THE PARTICIPANTS' ASSIGNMENTS USUALLY RELATE
a. Preschool 1 Jr. High (1-1) 20 g. et... 4. Sec.
a. Public 1760 1a. Nonpobtle
17. AREA OF SERVICE OF SCHOOL OR SYSTEM WHERE EMPLOYED (prdegnont Outwits lock)
b. K . Gr 3 0 . Sr. High (10-12) 119e. Elan (1C-4) I. Secondary (7-12) 50
h. PostSee. Vocational-1. Aillult EduestIon
9
8
p. Rural or small town- General population
a.-Rural or renal town. poverty are.
e. Uttar.- general population
48 Urban poverty eyes 20
1577
. Suburban 39
111. STUDENT BODY OF SCHOOL (or oehoodoIN TERMS OF THE PERCENT WHO COME FROMFAMILIES AT OR SE LOW THE POVERTY LINE I`s, o+. 5 d. 20-2111. 36 g. SO-59% 14 1 I. 10-19% : 1a. 1-97. 43 so-m. 10 11 fo-f 7 5 k. 1101007."a . 6 k
S. 10-197. 42 t. 40-497 15 I. 10-797.. A
19. STUDENT BODY OF SCHOOL(or choo/o)IN TERMS OF THE PERCENT WH &COME FROM SPECIFIED MINORITY RACIAL OR ETHNIC
ACKGROUNOS.,
'a. NEGRO OR SLACK S. PUERTO RICANC. MEXICAN-
AMERICAN.
..
0. AMERICAN INDIAN. E. ORIENTAL '
a. 07. 17 a. 0% 75 a. 0% 8 a. 0% 32ak. 017;7.
1.7
a. 1- 9% 98 b. 1-97. 49 b. 1-97. 76 k. 1-9% 104 119
C. 10-197. .14 e. 10-19% 1.
C. 10-197. 1 28 C. 10-19% e.. 1019% 16
c. 2071 11
5
d 2029%
e." 30-39%
2
0 L.I
d. 70-297.
ie. 30-39%
2
139-L
a. 20-29%
le. 30-397.3
0
d. 20-297.
i. 30-397.
a4_.._2 3
. 30 -397.
1. 40-49% 6 r. 40-49% 0 (. 40-497. 6 'y f. 40-49% 0 1...40 -49% 2
e. so-sq% 3 c So-s9'. 0 a. 30-597.- 3 g. 50 -397.
"
1
0
g. 50-397.
h. 60-69%00h. 60-69% 1 h. 60-69% 0 ' h. 60-697. 1- h. 60-69%
t 72-79-1 0 i, 70-79n 0 _t. 70-797. 2 70-797. 0 a. 70-797.
ts
I. 40 -697. 2 3. 6049% 0 l 110-1197.. 4 i 62-197. 0 ),... 8049%
k. 90-90-1007. ' 9 k. 90-100". 0 k. 90-1007. 01
It. 90-1007. 0 11. 90-100%..- I
AREA OF SPECIALIZATION (If employee In an IntItutIon ( Mehra? education)
W. PARTICIPANTS EMPLOYED IN INSTITUTIONS OF HIGWER EDUCATION - THOSE PARTICIPANTS DISTRIBUTED IN THE FIRST
CATEGORY OF 17c. lib. AS "TEACHER TRAINERS" - BY AREA OF S4PECIALIZATION
a. ARTS OR SCIENCES.
3
b. EDUCATION57
C. OTHER
3
"TYPE OF POSITION FOR WHICH PARTICIPANTS ARE PREPARIfiG.
21. ALL PARTICIPANTS BY WHETHER THIS PROJECT IS PREPARING THEM TO ENGAGE IN A DIFFERENT TYPE OF POSITION
1
1
1
1
1
a, Preparing leer %ease type of positiem as at present (a reported In NOM 11) 99
b. PrePatir.g for adi(ferer.t type of position (Include teachers who we promo/rig to te.sch different euh)oce) 42
c. Particumnts in category b. Above by type of positiiin being prepared for
IL Teecber (oro gettirene frub(ece).
..
25
..
4. Educational side or paraprofessional2
2 Administrator e
25 ,7. Seboot volunteer . 1--
14,
1 S§.11Nernsor I 19S. CiNier educational poSitler i On chooi)
4 Atpil personnei si*e..V.)ist 22 t,%. Teacher trainer fin ertInatItutIon of hlePaer education)
5. Instructi0nY1 melit3 Spec-11911st (Includltrf librarian)5
C
1
1
APPENDIX J
SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION.(Spring Semester)
Second Semester
Subjective Questionnaire
11.
The attached forms indicate the individual breakdown by instructor andcourse of the Subjective Evaluation administered to the participants of the1973-74 EPDA Project, Professional Development Series for Work ExperienceEducaticin. ,
-
The following questions and statements were given-to the participantsfor their responses: I
0 How successfUl was the instructor in meeting the objectives of the course?
7 How would you rate they overall presentations of the instructors?
8 How would you rate the effectiveness of the pre and post test in measuringthe important elements of the course?
9 How would you rate the instructors use of time during class sessions:lecture, interaction, audio-visual, etc.
10 How would you rate the 6.6111 format and plan of the program?
. 11 Personally, how beneficial, was the information you received from thiscourse?
RuuttA o 5 SuAvey Queztionna-i)te Fox Futwee. PaAtiapaAon
I1 Would You be interested in participatingin future inservice training
.
programs of this type?
. 2 Suggestion% for set-up of program.1
r
Same as this one. -,
Weekend workthops on specific'topics. .
Workshop meeting every night for one or two.weeks.,
TThele/au5-30-73Attachment
.4. 92
4
.1
Ase
%on
.als
. r -
tr.
asai
mas
me
owum
. me'
AIM
r61
111
'IN
ST
RU
CT
OR
S-
TO
TA
LS
Aeb
ee.,
ve/%
%?,
Men
keO
bsen
Rag
an -
Reg
naed
isS
penc
eM
anag
eine
rit
Excellent
aSatisfactory
Weak
.
a 6 c
'13 4 0
.
_7.,
-'
1 0.
.
26
-5
,
0
15
?
1 0
12 5 0
11 1 0
10 2 0
.
'94
.19 0'
Excellent
7Satisfactory
Weak
s,
a b c
-)
1.2 5 0
821 10
-
0.
16 6 0'
_14 .'3 . 0
.8.
3
w0
10 2 0
'.
89 23
,
0
Excel lent-,
8Satisfactory
Weak
.a b,
c
'4 9 4
.
.2
'
4-
1
9
13 8
4'
8 4
2 8.
T
'2 5 3
-
.3 9 0
%26
56
27
.Excellent
9Satisfacto-y
Weak
.-
b
15
.2 0
7 0!
%IV
-
23 7 0
14
.2 0
.
.
11 6
.0
.
9 2
i0
111 0
,
90
20 0
Excel lent
10
Satisfactory
Weak
/I.
a b
.
8 8 0
-
7 0'
0.
.
22,,,
7'''
1
151 0
.7
,..10 .0
7 4 0_
120 0
A78
30 .1
-Excellent
11
Satisfactory
' Weak
,.
a b
'{c
12 4
:0
7 0 0
21
10 0
12 0
10 6 1
6'
'5'
,lit
a,
.v
111 o
,
79 29 1`
-,
1Yes
ITO---
ea"'
"
14
,2_
,
Re/
Rd/
Zs
-
o6 S
uvey
7 0
Que
isti.
onna
de31
&
0
Fait
15 1
Fwtane.
'16
,1
.
alit-
Lapc
t:tilo
nl.
9 26
12 0
104 6
CM
+- .
2'
I" -l
.a
14. 2 0
----
.---
----
-
-5 1 0
' 23 4
, 0.--
/,10 7
.--
jo--
- --
--z-
-
8-
10 2--
-;"
-a
6 g i.
102 0
76"
-28-
-
3.
TThel ef/au
5/10/,`3-
0.11
.11.
10.1
=Pm
r.--
r--,
_---
---7
---
'..A
.11-
.'''..
1111
1.I
II
I'N
Wmos Imme mg mop me ems
mil
omme
-,-,
,--
I -I
V,S
,.7-
-R U
C T
O R
S.
TO
TA
LS
In.6
tAU
CO
ltT
OT
AL.
...
_^
-...:
&ve
tch
Bitu
bake
nE
ti.nt -
Jo k
vs o
n',
May
oSo
yaO
pmat
iona
tG
iZem
oite
Cot
4e.'.
'Exc
elle
nta
0,S
.-at
isfa
ctO
i-yb
Ilea
k.,
c
.-7
.1
t0
12 ' 00
,..
15,
1 0
4.1
7 2'..
0
11 2 0
624 4 0
A n. 4 0
Exc
elle
nt.
a.
7S
atis
fact
ory
.b-
t*af
.'c
-.
...
.6 .2
.'0
.12 O
r 0'
1.5 1 0.
172
''
0.
.11 2 0
617
-%1
6 2 0
6 ,2 0
- .
Exc
elle
nt'.
8ida
ta s
fa o
tory
b-W
eak
c,,.
2'
.5
,,1.
.
6,
6z.
0-.
4. 11.
1.
.5`1
2
_2
,_
6_7
0
23--
414
0 8. 0
0 8,..
,__0
Exc
ell.e
nt9.
&I-
US
faQ
.tory
.
Wea
k
4,.
I' 0 :.
'11\
a I.
-, ,-
0
14-
2.
,0
19-
0 -0
9 4.
0
67.
110
3 5 -0
3 -5 .0
..E
xcel
lent
4w
sS
atis
fact
ory
b'W
eak
c.
...d
.
4',
4 .0
lb i
e-
7'.-
0..-
s,
.12 4
-.
0-'
.
13.
5 0
103 0
.49
,18
".
_0
3 5 0,
'3P
5 0
Exe
611.
nt'.4
a
p 1
sfac
tory
b-W
c--
,,
4
-,
.
..'1
2:\_
0 -,
'0
13' 3 0
18-
1 0!
.11 I 1
589'
--.
1
6.
.2 0
6 2 0
1.
Yes
-;
,duo
- ...
:'6
..1
,A
....
.
elid
tzoi
'Sto
.vey
.
'.'12
-.
0
Que
.6,ti
.okm
ai.A
.e
13 3
I
190
Fon
.F
utw
c.e.
Pa4
i.e2p
atio
n13 0'
635
8 a.
----
-0
;..
- ..4
- *a
2'-
,b'
..
,;
I.
d-
'P
-.6
' -1-
....
.-- '1
"
8 4 0
\12
,'4
...0
145 0
.
8 2 3.
48 16 4
8 2 0
8 2 Q,
1
.APPENDIX J
SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION (Spring \Semester)
\
I
At.--'SeCond.Semester,.
Sujective'Quegtionnaire.. \
\
. ,
The attached forms indicate the individual- breakdown by instructor andcourse of the Subjective Evaluation administered to the participants of ,tile1973 -74 EPDA Project, Professional Development Series for Work ExperienceEducation: il
'
,
The following questions and statements were g iven to the participantsfor their responses:
1, \
0 How succeul was the instructor in meeting the objectives of the course?,
successful1
i
\
7 .How' would you rate the overall pres,entations of the instructors?
f
,.8' How would you rate the effectiveness of the pre and post test in measuringthe important elements of the course?
I
9 How wound you rate the instructors use of. time duringI
class sessions:lecture,interaction, audio - visual, etc.
.
;\ 1
10 How wouldlyou rata the overall format and plan of the program?/
1
/
1
,
11 Personal4, how beneficial was the information you received. from thiscourse? !
1 .
4
II
R lit t6 04 Su/my Q!..LaionnaiAe Fox Futute Paiqicipagan
1 'Womild you be interes ted in participatinOn future inService training_Oograms f this type?
2 .Suggestio s for set-up of program.1
Same a this one.4 Weaken workshops on specific topics.
'
Worksh p meeting every night f4. one or two wgelfs.
i.
, I
1IThele/au
--i 5-30-73
Attachment'
111
7
MI VIII
env
OMB NW 111111
me
sow
am
als
um
orlin
..
kiS7 : '.:CTORS
.TOTALS
Aeb.ep
__!t
n...
ti.,
Y,,:.:z-,!:
,2,s en
Ragan
-_
Reynotcts
Spen
ceManagement
.-Excellent
a.
-0
Satisfactory'
bc
:7---
Weak
13 4 0--- ----__
7.
:6
15
4.-.------
.11
10 2 0
.
94
19
.
0
-,>
- --;
,:.
00
" -)-1'.5-,-40.4-,., i..-....:
0
; -
1 0
Excellent
7Satisfactoi.
Weak
,
,...
a' b.
-c
12 5 0
Cif
71
116
010
t__.
0
._.0
14 3 0
.8 3 0
10 -.
.2 '0
89
.
23
'0
Excellent
a
8Satisfactory
,b
Weak
c-
9
.4
.C
.A
-a
13
.8
1:s. _.
a,
2 8 7
2 5
'3
.
'31 Y
'0
26
56
.27
Excellent
a
-9 Satisfactory
b
Weak
15-
2 0
i23-
/14
0,
i2
0%."
4 1.
i
11 5 0
90
_20 0
/9---
2 0
11 _1
.0
i EXcellent
a
10
Satisfactory
b_.
Weak
- .....
.
8 8 0
722
15
fsi
1 _
9_
_k
7,
7 01 _, .
7 4 0
12 -0 0
78
.
30 1
ExCellent
-a
11 Satisfactory
b
_Weak
-C
12 ,
4 0
.-.
-i
,-12-__.
0,
, ,{)
3n
._
00
10 6
6 5
-0
11
.1 0
79
29 1
Yes
No
_...
ReRtas
14 2
-,
-,--7.---------
oi Su..veif nut.,,s4,Len.tautir.-,-
.:tituu PaAticipation
73 1
115
g-
19
.-...,
0,
01
12
1
12 0
104 6
a
2.
b
-c
..
14 2 0
5 1 0
2
i
1
I10
86
t7
10 ------2
-t
1..
1.0 2 0
76
,
.28 3
e/au
5/30/73
e' e
r no
t em
s in
ow
as
No
on. a
s on
me
owl o
n Im
o an
sw
el
,1 N S- T R U'C T 0 R S
TOTALS
..
InAtuato/t.
TOTALS
Bakal%
8412baket
Wilt
'
John4on
'
Mayo
.
Sovet
Openationat1
Gitimoke
.,
Cottege
,.
Excellent
a,..,
'0
Satisfactory
bWeak -
c.
'7 '1 0
12
'
0 0
15 1 0
.
17 2 0
11 .2
,-0
62 6 0
4 4 0
4'
4
.0
Excellent'
a
7Satisfactory
1Weak
c,
6 2 0,
12-
.
0 0.
15 1 0
.
17 2 0
\
11 2 0
61
47
.
0
.
6 2
.0'
5.
2 0
ExcellOnt.
a
8,Satisfactory
b
Weak
'
c.
2-
5,
a.
.
.6 6 0
4
11
,
-1
5
12 2
0'
7 0
23
41
,4
0 8 0t
,0 8 0
.
Excellent
a9
Satisfactory
b' Weak
-.
c
4-
4'
0
11 1 0
14 2 0
iM
19 0 0
9 4 0
57
11 0
3 5 0
3.
5 0
Excellent
a10
Satisfattory
b.
Weak,
'c
=
4 4 0'
10 2 0
12 4
'
0
13 5'
0
10 3.
0'
49
1'
0
.3 5 0
3 5.
.0
.
Excellent
a
11
Satisfactory
b,
'
Weak
c
4 4- 0,'
,
12 0 0
13 3
'
0
18
'
1'
0
11
.
'
1 1
.58 9 1
6 2 0
,.6 2 0
1Yes
No
'6 2
.
Reiati oiS Stavey Quatibnnaike
12
.13
03
Fox
19
.
0.
Futtpte Patticipation
'
13 0
,
'
63 5
.
8 0
8 0
a.2
'
i i . !
'c
6.
1 1
8 '
4 0.
12 4.
.
0
14 5 0
8 2 'I
.
.
4816 4
8 2 0
i2 '
0
._......._
...-
........
TTI)ele/au
5/30/73
-