2016 IPT Annual Conference
If It’s Property Tax Exempt, Tax It Anyway!
How Local Jurisdictions Tax Publicly Owned Properties
Cutchin Powell Principal
Ryan, LLC Washington, DC
Colin Fraser Associate
Greenberg Traurig, LLP Irvine, CA
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Topics to be Covered
• Nature of Possessory Interest Taxation (PIT)
• Jurisdictions where PIT is Levied
• Recent Legal and / or Administrative Changes
• Properties and Industries Subject to PIT
• Calculating PIT
• Remedies to Correct Improper Assessments
• Open Discussion / Q&A
2
2016 IPT Annual Conference
What Is Possessory Interest Tax?
3
2016 IPT Annual Conference
What is a Possessory Interest?
4
“Possessory Interest” Defined: The right to the use and the occupancy of real estate, as distinguished from any interest in title. Possessory interests are created from contracts such as leases, permits, or licenses. For example, a leasehold estate is a possessory interest. - Appraisal Institute, The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Fifth Edition
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Leasehold vs. Leased Fee Interests
5
“Leasehold Interest” Defined:
The tenant’s possessory interest created by a lease.
“Leased Fee Interest” Defined:
A freehold (ownership interest) where the possessory interest has been granted to another party by creation of a contractual landlord-tenant relationship (i.e., a lease). - Appraisal Institute, The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Fifth Edition
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Same as a Fee Simple Estate?
6
No.
“Fee Simple Estate” Defined:
Absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police power, and escheat. - Appraisal Institute, The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Fifth Edition
2016 IPT Annual Conference
General Application of PIT
7
In General: • May apply to land, improvements, or both
• Always applies to private, beneficial use of publicly-owned, non-taxable real property
• For example, where private entities lease or use government-owned property
2016 IPT Annual Conference
General Application of PIT
8
Basic Limitations: • Personal property is typically exempt.
• Easements, covenants, licenses, and profits are typically exempt.
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Impacted Industries / Property Uses
9
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Properties Potentially Subject to PIT
10
• Offshore mineral / oil rights
• Cable television right-of-way easements
• Marinas, piers, & container operations at harbors
• Airport terminals, cargo space, & car rental facilities
• Ski resorts or lodging on public lands
• Cattle grazing rights on public lands
• Concessions spaces at public convention centers
• Private companies leasing public land or buildings
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Where Is PIT Levied?
11
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Where is PIT Levied?
12
Applicable Jurisdictions:
• PIT may be levied where real estate tax (RET) is levied
• Typically at the county or city level
• States with jurisdictions that may have PIT:
CA CO CT DC FL GA
HI ID IL IO KY LA
MD MA MI MN MS MT
NE NV NH NJ NY NC
ND OH OR RI SC TN
TX VT WA WV WI
2016 IPT Annual Conference
States with Potential PIT
13
2016 IPT Annual Conference
“Recent” Law & Decisions
14
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Is PIT Law Changing?
15
United States Supreme Court:
• City of Detroit v. Murray Corp. of America, U.S. Supreme Court, March 3, 1958. • A state or local jurisdiction may levy PIT if
they enact corresponding local law.
California:
• Seibold v. County of Los Angeles, Court of Appeals, September 22, 2015. • Hangars leased for private use at a public
airport may be subjected to PIT.
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Where is PIT Law Changing?
16
California Continued…
• California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS) v. County of Los Angeles, Court of Appeals, May 7, 2013. • Reversionary value of possessory interest
shall be exempt from PIT.
• Vanguard Car Rental USA, Inc. v. County of San Mateo, Court of Appeals, February 8, 2010. • Space leased by auto rental merchants at
public airports may be subjected to PIT even if there are multiple lessors.
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Where is PIT Law Changing?
17
California Continued…
• DFS Group, L.P. v. County of San Mateo, Superior Court, Decision Pending.
• Issue: Valuation of the exclusive nature of concessions at SFO Airport.
• Exclusivity is a non-taxable intangible asset pursuant to Rev. & Tax Code § 110(d)(3).
• While the fair market value of using publicly owned realty is assessable, any premium stemming from operation of an exclusive concession on such lands is exempt from assessment.
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Case Studies
18
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Case Study No. 1: California
19
• The legal basis for taxing possessory interests is found in the general mandate of the California Constitution that all property is taxable unless otherwise provided by law.1
- 1 Cal. Const., Art. XIII, § 1
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Case Study No. 1: California
20
Case Study 1, continued…
For a PI to be taxable it must be: • Exclusive: Holder can exclude others from
the property. • Independent: Holder has autonomy from
the public owner. • Durable: Possession is for a determinable
period of time. • A Private Benefit: Use does not simply
benefit the public owner.
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Case Study No. 1: California
21
Case Study 1, continued…
In De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San Diego (1955) 45 Cal.2d 546, the California Supreme Court established the method of valuing possessory interests: Value is equal to the present value of the future market rents under the leasehold, reduced by any allowed expenses of the public owner paid from the market rent.
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Case Study No. 2: District of Colombia
22
• DC enacted PIT in 2000 to close a “present loophole in the District’s tax laws.”
• For PI to be taxable it must be: 1. A lease of government-owned real property 2. Leased by an entity or individual who is not
tax exempt, and 3. A lease that will not be used “for an exempt
or immune purpose”1
- 1 D.C. Code § 47–1005.01(b).
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Case Study No. 2: District of Colombia
23
Case Study 2, continued… • PIT may not be imposed if it would cause DC
“to breach a pre-existing agreement or other legal obligation.”2
• Recently, Donald Trump acquired the rights to redevelop the Old Post Office Pavilion in DC into a luxury hotel, but his bid proposal did not take into account PIT. Trump requested a special exemption from the tax but was denied. Annual PIT reportedly will exceed the $3 million estimated base rent on the property.
- 2 D.C. Code § 47–1005.01(c)(2).
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Case Study No. 3: Texas
24
• Texas has no state income tax so property tax is the largest source of funding for local services.
• The Texas Constitution provides that all real and tangible personal in property in the state is taxable unless a federal or state law provides an exemption for it.1
- 1 Tex. Const., Art. VIII, §§ 1.
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Case Study No. 3: Texas
25
Case Study 3, continued…
• For a PI to be taxable it must be: 1. An interest in tax-exempt land2
2. Held by a non-exempt entity or person 3. For a non-exempt use 4. Last at least 1 year in duration (including
potential extensions)3
• The PI is appraised at the market value of the leasehold or other PI.
- 2 Tex. Tax Code Ann., § 23.13.
- 3 Tex. Tax Code Ann., § 25.07(a).
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Are PIT And RET Values The Same?
26
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Possessory Interest vs. Real Estate
27
NO. • PIT & RET valuation are different in two ways:
1. For PIT, only rights held by the private user are valued.
2. PIT excludes property rights that revert to lessor at end of lease (aka - “reversionary interest”).
• PI assessments are frequently less than comparable RE assessments of similar privately-owned properties
2016 IPT Annual Conference
How Is PIT Calculated?
28
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Valuation Methodology
29
Generally Accepted Methodology:
• Unlike with RE, a PI includes only a partial interest, not the full fee simple interest.
• Acceptable means of valuing PIT varies by jurisdiction.
• Sample methods include:
1. Sales Comparison 2. Income Capitalization 3. Cost
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Valuation Methodology
30
Sales Comparison - Direct:
1. Begin With: Sale Price of Subject • Adjust for Cash Equivalency, for Market
Conditions, & Comparability
2. Add Present Value of Contract Rent • Less Required Expenses of Exempt Owner
3. Less Present Value of Lessee’s Expenses 4. Less Present Value of Lessee’s Entitlements
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Valuation Methodology
31
Sales Comparison - Indirect:
1. Begin With: Sale Price of Comparable
2. Less Present Value of Reversionary Value
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Valuation Methodology
32
Income Capitalization - Direct:
1. Begin With: Contracted Rent • Adjusted to Present Value
2. Add All Remaining Payments Over Contract Term
3. Less Present Reversionary Value
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Valuation Methodology
33
Income Capitalization - Indirect:
1. Begin With: Estimated Market Value • Utilize Estimated Market Net Operating
Income and Capitalization Rate in Direct or Yield Capitalization
2. Less Present Reversionary Value
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Valuation Methodology
34
Cost:
1. Begin With: Estimated Replacement Costs or Actual Original Costs of Improvements • Less Accumulated Depreciation &
Obsolescence
2. Estimate Land Value via Sale Comparison • Adjust for Cash Equivalency, Market
Conditions, & Comparability
3. Add RCNLD of Improvements & Land Value
4. Less Present Reversionary Value
2016 IPT Annual Conference
How Do You Prevent Over-taxation?
35
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Avoiding Improper Original Assessments
36
Proactive Planning:
• Record correct value upon change in ownership, inception of lease, or allocation between multiple leases
• Lessee interest only
• Acquisition Price Allocation
• Negotiating leases to consider:
• PIT or RET implications
• Payment structure
• Present value
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Correcting Improper Assessments
37
Retroactive Recourse:
• Administrative appeals:
• Typically “pay to play” - file assessment appeal & claim for refund
• May have limited timeframe to appeal
• May have tolling statute of limitations
• May include multiple venues / levels of appeal
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Correcting Improper Assessments
38
Retroactive Recourse continued…
• Judicial appeals (i.e. - court level):
• May replace other avenues of appeal
• May have limitations, such as CA’s “matter of law” requirement
• May be de novo or limited to prior administrative submissions
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Open Discussion – Q&A
39
2016 IPT Annual Conference
Thank you.
40
Cutchin Powell 202.470.3100
Colin Fraser 949.732.6663