T
Technco
stan
nicalonnecndard
Expctionds fo
B
SolarImpac
www.ewa.bh
pert ton guidor theahra
r PV Sysct on Av
Draft 1.0
August 2017
h
o devdeline Kinin
stems viation
7
velopnes agdom
p grind m of
d
1 SCO
1.1
2 SO
2.1
2.2
3 ASS
3.1
4 REQ
5 Reg
5.1 5.1.5.1.5.1.5.1.5.1.
ANNEX
OPE ...........
Reference
OLAR PV PO
Sources of
Analyzing
SESSMENT
Standard f
QUIREMEN
gulations is
Assessmen.1 Assessm.2 Assessm.3 Assessm.4 Assessm.5 The asse
X A ‐ EXAMP
.................
es ................
WER GENER
f the potenti
the impact o
PROCESS D
for Measurin
NTS ISSUED
ssued by th
nt of solar Pent within theent within theent within theent within Seessment of the
PLES OF SOL
Tab
.................
...................
RATION AN
ial impact ...
of glare .......
DEVELOPED
ng Ocular Im
BY THE EUR
e Italian av
V systems ace Sector 1 ......e Sector 2 ......e Sector 3 ......ctor 4 and Sece solar PV syst
LAR PV SYST
ble of cont
..................
...................
ND THE IMP
...................
...................
D BY THE US
mpact ...........
ROPEAN EA
viation auth
ccording to ..................................................................ctor 5 ............tems .............
TEMS ON A
tents
..................
...................
PACT ON AV
...................
...................
S FAA ..........
...................
ASA ............
horities ENA
ENAC‐ENAV.........................................................................................................
AIRPORTS ...
..................
...................
VIATION .....
...................
...................
..................
...................
..................
AC‐ENAV ....
.................................................................................................................................
..................
.................
...................
.................
...................
...................
.................
...................
.................
.................
.................................................................................................................................
.................
Page | 2
............. 1
............... 3
............. 4
............... 4
............... 5
............. 7
............. 10
........... 13
........... 14
............. 14............... 14............... 15............... 15............... 16............... 16
........... 18
1 SC
Althougtheir glaglare (a remarkathe glarsolar PVnecessathat thespots, afacilitiesThis docby USA want to paragrap
1.1 R
[1] P. JSch
[2] SpaAvi
[3] Solaww
[4] FAAGui
[5] FAAAirpWe
[6] EASERs
[7] ENA[8] ENA
reg[9] ENA
aernav
COPE
h solar PV pass surfaces continuous ably higher te effects areV systems locry in regards light reflectnd the solas located in scument revieand Europeainstall solar ph.
References
Janssen et ahiphol (AAS), aven Consultation”, Repoar Trade Asww.solar‐tradA, “Technicaide, NovembA, “Interim ports”, (httpednesday, OcSA, “Essentias Opinion 3‐2AC, “ImpiantAC, “Policy arding the inAC‐ENAV, “Vrea” (Prelimivigation”), Fe
anels are decan reflect source of brhan many ge expected tcated off airps to solar PV ted off the PVr PV equipmselected airpew will summan aviation aPV systems
s
al., TechnicaRE&PQJ, Voting, “Solar Port No.10/34sociation, “de.org.uk al Guidance ber 2010 Policy, FAA p://federalrectober 23, 20al requireme2007 ti fotovoltaicper l’installanstallation anVerifica prelnary assessmebruary 2015
signed to absunlight andright light). Tlass covers oto be quite ports can hasystems on V panels doement do not ort areas pamarize the sauthorities, pon airports.
l feasibility ol.1, No.8, ApPhotovoltaic 4/RPS/1, JanImpact of so
for Evaluatin
Review of egister.gov/a013 / Noticesents for the
i” (Photovoltazione e la nd managemiminare – Vment – Asse5
bsorb light and produce gThe light absor windows, negligible. Ave an impacairport and es not hit air affect the crticularly on studies perfoparticularly t. The list of t
study for a pril 2010 Energy Faci
nuary (2011)olar PV on
ng Selected
Solar Energa/2013‐2472s safety and
taics plants),gestione di
ment of solarVerifica poteessment of p
nd to reduceglint (a momsorbing potetherefore th
As a consequct on aviationespecially onport sites, escommunicatairside. ormed and tto process apthe relevant
solar energ
lities: Assess aviation and
Solar Techn
gy System P9), Federal
interoperab
, DISP 35 201impianti fot
r PV plants inenziali ostacopotential obs
e reflections,entary flashential of the he amount ouence theren. On the othn airside. Safspecially contion, navigat
he recommepplications fliterature is
y system at
sment of Pot
d airports”,
nologies on
Projects on Register /
bility regulat
10, April 201tovoltaici in n the airport oli e pericolstacles and h
, in certain sh of bright liPV modulesof light reflee is little chaher hand attfety reasonsnsidering thetion and sur
endations defrom developreported in
t Amsterdam
tential for Im
ed. 3.0, Ap
Airports”, F
Federally OVol. 78, No
ion of aerod
10 aeroporto”area”), Aprilli per la navhazards for
Page | 3
ituations ight) and s may be cted and ance that tention is requires eir critical rveillance
eveloped pers who the next
m Airport
mpact on
pril 2016,
AA Solar
Obligated o. 205 /
dromes”,
” (“Policy l 2010 vigazione the aero
2 SO
Solar PVnormallyairportsof PV syAirside ageneratiadditionevaluatemounteThe samnear airpThis doc
2.1 S
This par
The solawhich ispanels aThe Figuthe anti‐glass is a
OLAR PV
V systems cay these sola. Because ofstems on airauthorities ting plants bn to glint aned. For the ad, located ome procedurports. cument illust
FAA – Feder
EASA – Euro
ENAC ‐ Ente
ENAV – Ente
Sources of
agraph analy
solar PV syst
solar PV syst
ar PV technos designed toare now desigure 1 compa‐reflection laabout 13% th
POWER G
n be installear PV powef the prospecrports, wherethus have inbased on thnd glare, alabove reasoon airport, are could also
trates the res
ral Aviation A
opean Aviatio
Nazionale P
e Nazionale d
f the pote
yses the pos
tems on or in
tems off airp
ology generao maximize agned with atres the lightayer reduceshe incoming
Figur
GENERAT
ed on the roer generatingcted reductioe large rooftvestigated whe renewabso radar intons these aure suitably ao be recomm
sults of the a
Administratio
on Safety Age
Per L'Aviazion
di Assistenza
ential impa
sible source
n the vicinity
ports below a
ally consists oabsorption ot least one anthat single a
s to 1/3 the ilight.
re 1 – Comp
TION AND
oftop of buig systems, on of load detops and cleawhether the le energy rterference authorities reqassessed in rmended for t
analyses perf
on (USA)
ency (Europe
ne Civile (Ita
a al Volo (Ital
act
of impact on
y of airports,
air corridors
of flat panelof light and mnti‐reflectiveand antireflencoming ligh
arison refle
D THE IMP
ldings or cansmall‐scale emand recenared open spsolar PV sy
resources arand physicaquire that soregards to athe assessm
formed by th
ean Union)
ly)
y)
n aviation of
and
(i.e. “en‐rou
ls covered wminimize refle layer and section glasseht, while the
ection analys
PACT ON
n be ground or utility‐scntly we see apace are usuastems and inre compatibl penetratioolar projectsny possible ent of solar
he authoritie
:
ute”).
with speciallylections. Furome panels es reflect: it ireduction o
sis [1]
AVIATION
mounted. Hcale, are locan increasingally availablen general thble with avion of airspas, rooftop oimpacts on r PV systems
es listed belo
y manufacturthermore mhave multipis worth to nobtained with
Page | 4
N
However, cated off g request e. he power ation. In ace were r ground aviation. s located
ow.
red glass most solar le layers. note that h a single
The antisilicon‐cnot neethe fronto increacomponrole. Further in generutility scto aircrawith radworth to
In the enraised, banalyses
2.2 A
The conmajoritycorridorproblem
In the lig“en routsignificaaccount
i‐reflective lacrystalline PVd it becausent of the PV case the PV mnent in whole
issues can bral the overacale PV plantaft. Additionadar transmiso notice that
solar PV panfields,
further equcause electrstandards.
nd glare by sbecause it ms the potenti
Analyzing
cern of the ay of solar PVrs (i.e. “en roms to pilots, f
dazzle/glareapproach an
dazzle/glarephase of flig
pilots in thesources suchof water; tpotentially m
the pilot viethe downwasource of gla
ght of the ate” environmnt, and an .
ayer, made V modules. Te of their intcells (i.e. behmodule effice, because in
be related to all installatiots, are unlikeally, due to tsions. As regt:
nels produce
ipment incluromagnetic d
sunlight specmay act as aial impact of
the impac
aviation authV systems aroute”). Solarfor the follow
e is likely tond landing; n
e occurs almght will be at
e “en route”h as large asthese are nmuch higher
ew from mosard directioare on the gr
bove, it is unment. Anyhoadditional a
by Silicon HyThin film PV ernal structuhind the fronciency but is n this case th
physical sizen including tely to have sthe low profigards the po
e DC current
uding invertedisturbances
cularly refleca distractionglare on avi
ct of glare
horities focure located ofr PV systemswing reasons
o present a ormally the
ost exclusivehigher angle
” phase are ssemblies of ot considerluminosity v
st cockpits, pn by the airround.
nlikely that aow, in the evanalysis is re
ydride or simmodules maure. When pnt glass). Unalmost uselhe reflection
e and electrothe technicasufficient heiles of the sootential impa
and this cur
ers and transs assuming th
cted off the n to pilots oation.
e
sed on solarff airports, as located off s [1]:
hazard only“en route” p
ely at low anes of elevatio
already subparked carsed to requvalues than P
particularly inrcraft struct
a glare analyvent the impequired, the
milar substaay not have present, the fortunately, ess if we con of the fron
omagnetic inl rooms neceeight to consolar PV panelacts in term
rrent flow ca
sformers conhey comply w
PV panels rer air traffic
r PV systemsand only fewairports are
y during critphase is not
ngles of elevon
bjected to g, major glassire analysis PV panels
n the forwarture, thus b
ysis is necesspact on aviate following
nces, in mossuch a layeranti‐reflectivthe anti‐reflnsider the lit glass plays
nterference. essary, especstitute a phys, there is lits of frequen
nnot genera
nnected by Awith EMC dir
emains the ocontrollers.
on or near aw of them we unlikely to
tical phases a critical pha
vation; aircra
glare from ashouse facilitand mitiga
rd direction, locking the
sary for any ion of a solaprinciples sh
st cases is pr but usuallyve layer is plective layer ight reflectios the most im
These PV pacially in caseysical collisiottle risk of inncy interfere
ate any radia
AC circuits wirectives and
only issue likThe next p
airports. Actwill lay belowpresent glar
of flight, ease
aft in the “e
a number ofties and largation despite
is severely lline of sigh
solar facilitiar PV systemhould be ta
Page | 5
resent in y they do placed on is useful on of the mportant
anels and e of large n hazard terfering ence, it is
ting
ll not
ely to be aragraph
tually the w the air re/dazzle
especially
en route”
f existing ge bodies e having
imited in ht to any
es in the m is rated ken into
Whereawhen deIn orderPV instafrequenFor examcertain oto calcuthe stud
In additiand madwhen pr
PV panels areflection areflects app2% of the in
These valueThe Figure 2the vegetatiHowever coGlasses, snomaterials dif
s solar PV sevelopers har to assess thallation, or tcy with whicmple such sorientations late the incidy should add
possible sou
PV panel ori
sun azimuth
ion to such tde available roposing the
are constrund maximizeroximately 7cident light.
es are lower 2 shows that on and the r
omparing theow and calmffuse the ligh
Figu
ystems cannad attemptedhe probabilityo controllersch specular tudy will bethe PV panedence of refdress the fol
urces of refle
entation in a
h and elevatio
type of studyto develope installation
cted from se transmissi7% of light. P
than the refthe reflectivrural environe reflectivity m water refht in all direc
re 2 ‐ Compa
not endanged to install thy of glare occs of air traffreflections oe required inel may creatflections to clowing issue
ction, in add
azimuth and
on angles for
y, a proved mers in order of a solar PV
specially‐treion of light PV panels are
flectivity of vity of the sonment, and mof sunlight bflect the soctions and th
arative refle
er “en routehese systemscurring to pific control tooff the panen case of one an hazard critical posites:
dition to PV p
elevation
r the solar PV
methodologythey can be
V system on
ated low‐irothrough thee expected to
other materolar PV panemuch lower tby different olar beams aherefore the
ction analys
” aviation os on or near lots of aircraowers, a detls would be n‐airfield solabecause of tions (taxiwa
panels
V site for spe
y and a detaie informed aor near airpo
on glass, dee glass. Stano reflect a to
rials or the nls is lower ththan the reflmaterials is at a given effect has le
sis [1]
perations, cairport. afts flying in tailed analysoriented toar PV systemthe specularys/runways
ecified perio
led proceduand aware oorts.
esigned to mndard low‐irotal of appro
natural envirhan the refleectivity of thnot straightangle, but aess impact.
concerns we
the vicinity osis should asowards thesems, knowingr reflections.and control
ds
ure should beof the steps
Page | 6
minimize ron glass oximately
ronment. ectivity of he water. tforward. all other
re raised
of a solar ssess the e targets. that for In order towers),
e defined required
3 AS
The forenavigatithat couairspaceimpact aairspace
Figu
For on aassess tgovernmespecialassessm
SSESSME
emost mission system. Tuld impact ae, interferenair traffic, like conflicts.
re 3 – Possib
airport projethe potentiaments are exly large pro
ment process.
ENT PROC
ion of the To meet thiairspace. Thece with radake specular r
ble conflicts
ects FAA reqal impact ofxpected to iojects, prese.
CESS DEV
US Federal s objective, ese studies ar communicreflections. F
between av
quires the af the projecinform the ents any safe
VELOPED
Aviation Adthe FAA pereview physcations, andFigure 3 prov
viation and r
applicant fillsct on air naFAA so thatety or navig
D BY THE
dministrationerforms studsical incursiod any other cvides a grap
enewable po
s and files tavigation. Fot the agencygational pro
US FAA
n (FAA) is ties of activitons of propoconditions thhical illustra
ower genera
he documenor off‐airpory can determblems. The
to ensure a ties or constosed structuhat might nation of the
ation (Source
ntation necert projects tmine if the Figure 4 sh
Page | 7
safe air tructions ures into egatively potential
e [4])
essary to the local projects, hows the
The proAirportsbecausehazard d The doc
As mentthe solastandardprojects Regardinrequirem
Figure 4
ocess, illustras” [4] issuede the FAA wdeterminatio
umentation
location of s
verification t
verification t
verification the approac
assessment Tower and a
tioned in Sear PV moduds. Anyway ts are set back
ng the penetments issued
4 – FAA Tech
ated in the d on Novemwas required on”.
filed by the
solar PV pane
that the sola
that the sola
that solar Pch surface
of reflectivitaircraft
ction 2.1, raules and theto ensure suk from major
tration of thd by airport a
hnical Guida
“Technical Gmber 2010, wto assess se
applicant for
els, absolute
ar PV panels
ar facilities w
V panels wil
ty including t
adar interferee installatiouch systems r on‐airport r
e imaginary authorities th
nce, proced
Guidance forwas developeveral on ai
r on airport
e and with re
are located
will not affect
ll not physic
time periods
ence cannotn of equipmare further radar equipm
surfaces, anhat establish
ure for a pro
r Evaluating ped prior thirport solar
projects spe
eference to ra
outside of ai
t radar comm
cal penetrate
s when specu
t be an issuement that fisolated the ment by e.g.
ny potential ihes standard
oject assessm
Selected Sohe publicatioPV projects
cifies the be
adar facilitie
irport design
munications
e airport ima
ular reflectio
e based on tfulfil the avguidance re500 feet (15
mpact can bs for determ
ment [4]
olar Technolon of the gthat receive
low informa
es and Contro
n prohibited
aginary surfa
on may affec
the charactevailable inteequired that 50 m).
be assessed bmining obstru
Page | 8
ogies on guidance, ed a “no
tion:
ol Tower
areas
aces, like
t Control
eristics of rnational solar PV
based on uctions in
navigablwhere aabove ththe runwmust mconformhigher tStructurpenetratto a heigwithout the imag
Fig
In regarincominreflectedblindnestype of lpanels sglass so incidencglare. The “Temethod
le airspace. Taircraft are lihe ground ofway. Away fraintain vege
m with thesehan 200 feeres shorter tte navigableght of as littlpenetratingginary surfac
ure 5 – FAA
ds to the reg sunlight. Wd light is evss can only olight and occspecularly rethat much oce the more t
chnical Guidology for ca
These imagikely to fly wf the imaginarom airportsetation, preve requiremenet, require anhan 200 feee airspace. Soe as 1 or fewg an imaginaces that defin
Technical G
flectivity, asWhile the amven more imoccur from scurs when theflect can beof the light cthe light tha
dance” the FAarrying out
nary surfacewhile also accary surface is, airspace bvent buildinnts. Structurn applicationt but locatedolar panels, w meters aboary surface.ne the naviga
uidance, Ima
reported inmount of lighmportant wpecular reflehe surface in difficult to an be reflectt is specular
AA publisheda detailed a
es extend oucommodatins lowest neaegins at 200g, and manres like commn is submitted within 20,when tilted ove ground,The Figure 5able aerospa
aginary Surf
n Section 2.2ht reflected when assessiections. Specquestion is spredict: howted in a specly reflected.
d on Novemassessment
ut from the rg unforeseear the runwa0 feet (60.96age any temmunication ted for any ne000 feet (6,as expectedmaking it po5 shows a cace.
aces that De
2, today’s paoff a surfaceng the potecular reflectismooth and wever the pacular way. AdThese specu
mber 2010 diof glare, ap
runway in a n aircraft maay and incream) above g
mporary contowers and wew construct096.00 m) od to the soutossible for sitomprehensiv
efine Naviga
nels reflect ae is importanential for flaon reflects apolished. Hoanel covers additionally thular reflectio
d not specifyart from th
manner thataneuvers. Thases at distaground level.nstruction acwind turbinction or modof a runway th‐facing sunting close to ve represen
ble Airspace
as little as 2nt, the natuash blindnea more concow much lighare flat and he more theons are respo
y or recommhe geometric
Page | 9
t reflects he height nce from Airports ctivity to es, often ification. may also n, extend runways tation of
e [4]
2% of the re of the ss. Flash centrated ht the PV made of
e angle of onsible of
mend any cal study
already when sua controgeometrAlthougglare, it to an ha
Figure
Accordinreviewinrespect FAA estdefiningthat theissued tdevelopThe “Intequipmeand NAunsuitabActuallyfacilitiesfacilitiesdo, is ththe appneeds to
3.1 S
The FAAshown isystem osystem s
mentioned. unlight will reol tower or ric analysis. h the geomcannot quan
azard scale sp
6 – Geomet
ng to an ofng the “Techto compatibtablished a wg thresholds e guidance wthe “Interim ed. terim Policyent requiredVAIDS. The ble for the y this meant s by ensurins. Knowing the siting the lication is filo review the
Standard f
A Interim Pon Figure 7 aon airports. shall meet th
This type ofeflect off of any surface
etrical studyntify the ampecifying the
trical study o
fficial note inical Guidanbility and glarworking grofor when gliwas expectePolicy” 201
y” also provd for commu“Technical energy projthe airport
ng that solahese criticalsolar PV paled, the FAAapplication
for Measu
licy [5] definas the standTo obtain aphe following
f study empla fixed surfae at a given
y can identifount of reflee threshold t
of glare by th
issued on Once” based ore. oup to devent and glareed to change13‐24729 [5]
vided clarificunication, naGuidance” ects structusponsor is rr PV system areas are idnels and equA that is respby checking
uring Ocu
ned the metard for meapproval (andrequirement
loys geometace like a soln point. The
fy the sites hected light. That should n
he specular
October 201n new inform
lop a stande would impae, in order t setting the
cations regavigation, anrequired theures in the eresponsible ms remain cdentified by uipment accponsible for the propose
lar Impac
thodology baasuring the o update the ts:
ry and the kar PV panel e Figure 6 p
hit by specuThis amountnot be overco
reflections f
3 the FAA mation and f
ard for meaact aviation to assure ite updated st
arding the id surveillance airport spevent the sfor limiting clear of the the FAA, al
cording to thevaluating t
ed siting of th
ct
ased on the ocular impac“airport layo
known path oand contactprovides an
ular reflectio, if availableome in order
rom the PV
communicatfield experien
asuring glintsafety. Whils temporarilandards the
mpact of soce (CNS) faciponsor to idame might the risks forcritical arel the develohe applicablethe impacts he solar PV s
Solar Glare ct of any prout plan”) th
P
of the sun tot a fixed rece example o
ons and freqe, could be cor to prevent
panels (Sou
ted the intence, particul
t and glare,e notifying tly replaceme working gr
olar PV sysilities includidentify the affect radarr inference weas surroundopers are reqe FAA circulato CNS facilsystem.
Hazard Anaroposed solahe proposed
Page | 10
o predict eptor like f such a
uency of ompared glare.
rce [4])
ention of arly with
and for the users ent, FAA roup had
tems on ing radar locations r signals. with CNS ding CNS quired to ar. When lities just
lysis Plot ar energy solar PV
The prominute ido so thSolar Glasolar enHazard A
The SGHoutline tower cafor sun environmretinal irocular hplot thapotentiaevaluatiproduct
1 The fina
no potential
no potentiathe final app
cedure requintervals frohe FAA agreeare Hazard Anergy projectAnalysis Plot
HAT employsof the propoab and final position anment, and orradiance anhazards rangat specifies al ocular hazng alternativion while mi
al approach p
l for glint or
l for glare oproach path1
uires the ocum when theed with the UAnalysis Toot would resut.
Figure 7 –
s an interactosed solar Papproach pad vector caocular factornd subtendedging from tewhen glare zard. Becausve designs, lanimizing gla
ath is defined
glare in the c
r ‘‘low poten1
ular impact hsun rises abUS Departmel (SGHAT). Tult in the po
– Solar Glare
tive Google PV system, aaths. Site dalculations. Trs are entered source angmporary aftwill occur tse the tool aayouts, and lre. The tool
as 2 miles (3
cab of the ai
ntial for afte
has to be anbove the horent of EnergThis tool wasotential for o
e Hazard Ana
map whereand specify cata are automThe orientatied by the usgle (size/distaterimage to throughout also predictslocations to is available a
.22 km) from
rport traffic
er‐image’’ (sh
nalysed overrizon until thgy (DoE) the s designed toocular impac
alysis Plot (S
the user cacritical areasmatically recion and tilt ser. If glare ance) of the retinal burnthe year, ws the energyidentify confat www.sand
50 feet (15.24
control towe
hown in gree
the entire ce sun sets bfree‐of‐charo determine t as depicte
Source [5])
an quickly los sites like acorded providof solar PV is found theglare source. The results
with colour cy productionfigurations tdia.gov/glare
4 m) above th
P
er, and
en in Figure
calendar yeabelow the horge availabiliwhether a p
ed on the So
ocate a site, airport trafficding the info panels, refe tool calcue to predict s are presencodes indican, it can be that maximize.
he landing thre
Page | 11
7) along
ar in one rizon. To ity of the proposed lar Glare
draw an c control ormation lectance, lates the potential nted in a ating the used for ze energy
eshold
During tapproproriginal
the validity riate modifictechnical gu
of the “Inteations beforidance, this
erim Policy” e issuing a fi“Interim Pol
the FAA exinal policy. Bicy” is still in
xpected to rBut, despite tn force.
receive comthe FAA’s int
P
mments and tention to re
Page | 12
to make eview the
4 RE
Becauseprocedusystemsprovide updatingimpleme The EAS2007” [aerodroenvironm
“Othalso data otherinducor beadditintenalso aircraorderas de
The Esse
“ Ess2)
Indeed corder tobegan to The next
EQUIREM
e each Europures, there i on aviationcommon reg or issuing entation of r
SA – Europe[6] entitled mes”. The ment” (page
er types of aneed to be used as a br constructioced turbulene confusing tion to possnse light refleattract wildaft operatior to require Mescribed in An
ential Requir
ential RequirHazards relathe followinbe assessed a) any devb) the posc) the use d) the daze) …….”
clauses a) ano comply wio work and is
t paragraphs
ENTS ISS
pean countryis no uniquen. The Euroquirements,national lawrenewable en
ean Aviation“Essential
rationale ofe 12), reporte
activities, whcontrolled. Nasis when deons, even if nnce. Laser ligto, the flighsibly being hections or ind life to the ns taking plMember Stannex 14, Vol
rements ER C
rement C “Aeated to humag list, must and mitigatevelopment orsibility of buof hazardou
zzling caused
nd d) are invth these “esssue the nec
s report the
SUED BY T
y has its owne process apean Unionand each co
ws and regulanergy source
n Safety Agerequiremenf the Essented below:
hich might cNew developeveloping thnot identifiehts and othet crew. Larghazardous oterference tovicinity of alace there. Fates to take ml. I, Chapters
C.2 is present
erodrome Enan activities be monitoreed as appropr change in lailding induceus, confusingd by large and
volved whenssential requcessary laws
rules issued
THE EUR
n aviation aund methodon has foundeountry is reqations. A simes.
ency – issuents for the tial Requirem
create safetypments in lahe arrival andd as obstacler non‐aeronge solar photobstacles, mo radio navigan aerodromFor such reameasures to 5 and 9, and
ted in the sa
nvironment”and land useed and contrpriate: and‐use in thed turbulencg and misleadd highly refle
n implementuirement”, iand/or regu
by the Italia
ROPEAN E
thority, eneology for ased several iquired to commilar process
ed on 2007 safety and
ment is give
y hazards forand use mayd departure les, may creanautical lighttovoltaic panmight respecgation signame and so crasons ER C.2 protect aircd associated
ame docume
e, such as burolled. The ri
he aerodrome ding lights ective surfac
ing a solar Pnstitutions alations.
n aviation au
EASA
rgy policy anssessing the nstitutions wmply with ths occurred w
the documed interoperaen at Chapt
r aerodromeaffect the groutes. Newate dangerots may causenels or windtively createls. Human areate increashas been d
craft from suparts of Volu
nt (page 17)
ut not limitedisk caused b
me local area
es
PV system onand authorit
uthorities.
P
nd land manimpact of with the mhese requiremwith referenc
ent “ERs Opability regulter 1‐d “Ae
e operations,geographicaw buildings orous effects ofe dazzling of,d turbines, ine dangerousactivities mayased risks fordeveloped, inuch activities,lume II”.
), as reported
d to items onby them shal
n or near airties at natio
Page | 13
agement solar PV ission to ments by ce to the
pinion 3‐ation of rodrome
, l r f f, n s y r n ,
d below:
n ll
rports. In onal level
5 REEN
FollowinENAV (th
1.
2.
3.
The latteparagrapprocedu
5.1 A
The assecan intesignifica The profrom aicharactecharactecommun The reqareas, lowith the
5.1.1 A
Sector 1
EGULATIONAC-ENAV
ng the EASAhe Italian Air
“ENAC – DISstating that the energy activities.
“ENAC – POAEROPORTOplants in theconnected tfor the airpoallow solar Psolar PV planinterference
“ENAC‐ENAVnavigazione and hazardsinstallationsget approvaon airport o
er documenphs highlighture in [9].
Assessme
essment proerfere with tnt height an
cedure definrport. Planteristics museristics that nication, nav
uired assessocated on aie Instrument
Assessment
1 comprises t
ONS ISSUV
A “essential r Traffic Cont
SP 35 2010 each airportefficiency
LICY PER L’INO” [8] (“Polie airport areto the distribort activity aPV plants insnt to be instae and glare h
V ‐ Verifica aerea” [9] (“s for the a, structures al. This procer within 6 km
t defines thet the key rec
ent of sola
ocedure is rehe aero navd with poten
nes five (5) s/structurest pass the shall be inv
vigation and
sment is desrport or at st Landing Sys
t within the
the runway s
UED BY
requirementtrol Organiza
Impianti fotot shall take aand assure
NSTALLAZIONcy regardingea”) April 20bution netwond to send estalled for sealled on airpas to be eva
preliminare“Preliminaryaero navigatwhich requiess regards sm from airpo
e procedure commendati
ar PV syst
equired for pigation, suchntially reflect
Sectors, of d to be conassessmentvestigated asurveillance
scribed here selected diststem (ILS), th
Sector 1
strip (Figure
THE ITA
ts”, the ENAation) issued
ovoltaici” [7advantage ofthe sustain
NE E LA GESTg the install010, allowinork, in orderexcess electrelling 100% port, the poteluated durin
e ‐ Verifica y assessmenttion”) Februre a compatsolar PV plaort.
for the prelions set fort
tems acco
plants/structh as wind plting surfaces
different arenstructed wit before there the same equipment,
below withtance from ahat is, almost
8) that airpla
ALIAN A
AC (Italian Cd the docume
7] (“Photovof the renewanable devel
TIONE DI IMPation and mg the installr to generatericity to the of the generential impactng the design
potenziali ot – Assessmeuary 2015, stibility evaluants or buildi
liminary asseh according
ording to
tures insideants, solar Ps, etc.
ea and shapethin these ey can recee as above: and specula
reference tairport, and t all the airpo
anes use for
AVIATION
Civil Aviationents that are
ltaic Plants”)able energiesopment of
PIANTI FOTOmanagement ation of sole the electricgrid; the polrated electrit due to elecn phase.
stacoli e peent of potentstating typeation procesings/structur
essment of tto the “Prel
ENAC-EN
or next to tPV plants, bu
e, located atsectors andeive ENAC aphysical siz
ar reflections
to Sectors shapplies to thorts in Italy.
take‐off and
P
AUTHO
n Authority) e listed below
) April 2010s to improvethe airport
OVOLTAICI INt of solar PVar PV plantscity requiredlicy does noticity. For anyctromagnetic
ericoli per latial obstacleses of plantsss in order tores, installed
the project. iminary asse
NAV
he airport auildings/stru
t increasing d possessingapproval. Aze, interferes.
hown by redhe airports e
d landing.
Page | 14
RITIES
and the w:
, e t
N V s d t y c
a s , o d
The next essment”
rea, that ctures of
distance g specific gain the nce with
d colored equipped
Assessm
Figu
5.1.2 A
Sector 2 Assessm
Figu
5.1.3 A
Sector 3maximu Assessm
ment required
for any plan
ure 8 – Red a
Assessment
2 comprises t
ment required
for any plan
for the plantplants/struc
ure 9 – Red a
Assessment
3 is the imagm distance 2
ment required
d:
ts/structure
area showin
t within the
the approach
d:
ts/structure
ts/structuresctures reache
area showin
t within the
ginary surfa2500 m from
d:
s within the
ng the Sector
Sector 2
h surface, sta
s within 135
s to be constes the appro
ng the Sector
Sector 3
ce starting fm Sector 1 lim
Sector 1.
r 1 (source: I
arting from t
0 m from Se
tructed afterach surface.
r 2 (source: I
from the enmits.
Italian aviati
the Sector 1
ctor 1, regar
r 1350 m from
Italian aviati
ds of Sector
on authoriti
ends, with ti
rdless the he
m Sector 1, i
on authoriti
r 1 and Sect
P
ies ENAV‐EN
ilt 1.2% (Figu
eight.
in case the to
ies ENAV‐EN
tor 2, with t
Page | 15
NAC)
ure 9).
op of the
NAC)
tilt 1.2%,
Figu
5.1.4 A
Two mo
5.1.5 The asse
for any plan
for the planttop of plants
ure 10 – Red
Assessment
ore sectors ar
Sector 4, circdistance of mthe imaginar
Sector 5, circARP. Assessmareas)
The assessm
essment of S
ts/structure
ts/structuress/structures
area showin
t within Sect
re defined, a
cular surfacemax. 15 km fry surface of
cular surfacement require
ment of the
Solar PV proje
s within 200
s to be constreaches the
ng the Secto
tor 4 and Se
at increasing
e at a height form the ARPf the sector
e starting fored for plants
solar PV sys
ects or build
m from Sect
tructed after imaginary s
or 3 (source:
ector 5
distance fro
of 30 m fromP. Assessme
rm Sector 4 ls/structures
stems
dings/structu
tor 1 or Sect
r 200 m fromurface.
Italian aviat
om airport AR
m the lowestnt required o
imits, at a dihigher than
res that can
or 2, regardl
m Sector 1 or
tion authorit
RP (Aerodrom
t part of the only when th
stance of ma45 m ( 60 m
produce gla
P
less the heig
Sector 2, in
ties ENAV‐EN
me Referenc
runway, andhe height rea
ax. 45 km frowhen in urb
are is require
Page | 16
ght.
case the
NAC)
ce Point):
d at a aches
om the ban
ed when:
The ENA
At least onein case the surveillance siting of theENAC circulathe ENAC cinterferenceand the elec
The constru
o the
o the affe
Particularly tmust be inclrequirement
AC‐ENAV asse
rooftop solaairport, thatwill be place
solar PV plaassuming thsectors.
e of the condsolar PV prfacilities. S
e solar PV eqars, in order concerns me is not expectromagnetic
ction site is l
solar PV plan
overall surfacted by the p
the proceduuded in the ts in regards
essment is n
ar PV systemst don’t modied.
nts to be dee height of s
ditions descriroject can aimilarly to tquipment coto prevent aainly regardected when c compatibili
located with
nt has a surfa
ace of the PVplant constru
re requires adesign packato the meth
ot required
s of overall sfy the heigh
eveloped in Ssolar PV mod
ibed in the paffect the opthe FAA reqomplies withany impact od physical othe equipmeity directives
in 6 km from
ace of or larg
V panels is equction.
a study that age submittehodology to c
for the follow
surface lesseht of an alrea
Sector 4 (at adules don’t r
procedure is peration of uirements, th the requireon the aboveobstruction, ent comply s.
m the closest
ger than 500
qual or large
certifies the ed for the ENcarry out this
wing solar PV
er than 500 sady authoriz
a distance lareach the im
met. Such ccommunicatthe proceduements set fe said equipmknowing thwith the inte
ARP, and
0 sqm, or
r than 1/3 (3
absence of gNAC evaluatios study.
V systems:
qm, regardleed building w
arger than 6 aginary surfa
P
condition cation, navigaure requires forth in the ment. In thishat electromernational s
33%) of the p
glare. This ston, there is n
ess the distawhere the P
km) and in aces defined
Page | 17
n be met tion and that the available regards, magnetic tandards
plot
tudy no
nce from PV panels
Sector 5, d in these
ANNEX
A numberooftopsinvestigathe airpexample The UK issues ocomplaiBoston rpanels fpanels wtraffic co The “Tecthem ar
Fig
X A - EXA
er of solar PVs, are locateated suitablyport contractes of solar PV
Solar Tradeor sustainednts from airregional airpfor 45 minutwith an acceontrollers on
chnical Guide shown in t
gure 11 – Gro
AMPLES O
V systems haed on sites y, proper sititors, and theV system inst
e Associationd complaintsr traffic contport, New Hates each moeptable 10%nly, whereas
ance” reporthe next pict
ound mount
OF SOLAR
ave been insthat cannotng of the PVe airside auttalled on airp
n also perfors arising ontrollers was ampshire, USorning, which% decrease ono pilots or
ts case studures.
ted PV panel
R PV SYS
stalled on airt impact onV modules wathority. The ports.
rmed an extn grounds ofound withSA. Air traffih was then of power genaircraft repo
ies and exam
ls at Metrop(source: [4]
STEMS ON
rports. Somen aviation. Was agreed beFAA Techni
tensive reseof pilot dist respect to ic controllerresolved by neration. Fuorted any sim
mples of sola
politan Oakla)
N AIRPOR
e systems, grWhen this petween the dcal Guidance
arch and fotraction [3].one installas reported achanging thrthermore tmilar issues w
ar PV system
and Int. Airp
P
RTS
round mountpotential impdevelopers/ie [4] report
ound no exa. Some evidation at Mana patch of glhe orientatiothis was an with glare.
ms on airport
port – Califor
Page | 18
ted or on pact was nstallers, s several
mples of dence of nchester‐are from on of the issue for
s, two of
rnia
RegardinrooftopsInformahttps://winstalled
Figur
Figure 12 –
ng the instas or groundtion www.enav.itd on airport o
e 13 – PV pla
– Solar Trees
allation withd mounted is
t/sites/publior on sites be
ants in proxi
s on Parking
hin the Italiin remote savailable c/en/ChiSiamelow air corr
imity of the
g Garage at B
an airports,sites where
from mo/Photovoridors (“en ro
tower withi
Boston’s Loga
the ENAV air traffic c
theltaic.html. Toute”).
n the Bari ai
an Airport (s
installed PVcontrol eque ENThe picture
irport (sourc
P
source: [4])
V plants, onipment are NAV es show PV
ce: ENAV we
Page | 19
n airport located. website
V panels
ebsite)
Figure
Figure 1locate
14 – PV plan
15 – PV planted next to Bri
nts in proxim
t in proximityindisi (source
mity of the to
y of the ACC e: ENAV web
ower within
Radar bsite) op
the Brindisi
Figure 16 –perational bu
airport (sou
PV plant on uildings (sour
P
urce: ENAV w
the rooftop orce: ENAV w
Page | 20
website)
of an website)