Inbound Transactions and Federal Tax:
Compliance Issues With 1120-F, 8833 and Other Forms Tackling Protective 1120-Fs, Calculation of ECI and FDAP, Exemptions and Other Challenges
Today’s faculty features:
1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific
Please refer to the instructions emailed to the registrant for the dial-in information.
Attendees can still view the presentation slides online. If you have any questions, please
contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10.
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2012
Presenting a live 110-minute teleconference with interactive Q&A
James Sams, Principal, KPMG, McLean, Va.
Juan Carlos Ferrucho, Managing Director, Alvarez & Marsal Taxand, Coral Gables, Fla.
Kimberlee Phelan, Tax Services Partner, WithumSmith+Brown, Princeton, N.J.
Carola Knoll, International Tax Manager, WithumSmith+Brown, Princeton, N.J.
Silvia Flores, Senior Director, Alvarez & Marsal Taxand, Coral Gables, Fla.
For this program, attendees must listen to the audio over the telephone.
Tips for Optimal Quality
Sound Quality
For best sound quality, we recommend that you listen via the telephone by dialing
1-866-873-1442 and entering your PIN when prompted, and view the
presentation slides online.
If you have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. You may also
send us a chat or e-mail [email protected] immediately so we can address
the problem.
Viewing Quality
To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen,
press the F11 key again.
Continuing Education Credits
Attendees must stay on the line throughout the program, including the Q & A
session, in order to qualify for a full continuing education credits. Strafford is
required to monitor attendance.
Please refer to the instructions emailed to the registrant for additional
information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service
at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
Program Materials
If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please
complete the following steps:
• Click on the + sign next to “Conference Materials” in the middle of the left-
hand column on your screen.
• Click on the tab labeled “Handouts” that appears, and there you will see a
PDF of the slides and the Official Record of Attendance for today's program.
• Double-click on the PDF and a separate page will open.
• Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.
Inbound Transactions and Federal Tax: Compliance Issues With 1120-F, 8833 and Other Forms Seminar
Silvia Flores, Alvarez & Marsal Taxand
Kimberlee Phelan, WithumSmith+Brown
Dec. 5, 2012
Juan Carlos Ferrucho, Alvarez & Marsal Taxand
James Sams, KPMG
Carola Knoll, WithumSmith+Brown
Today’s Program
Overview Of Key Concepts
[Silvia Flores]
Fact Patterns With Implications For Inbound Investment Forms
[Juan Carlos Ferrucho and James Sams]
Application Of Concepts When U.S. Form Must Be Prepared
[Kimberlee Phelan and Carola Knoll]
Slide 8 – Slide 41
Slide 74 – Slide 89
Slide 42 – Slide 73
Notice
ANY TAX ADVICE IN THIS COMMUNICATION IS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN BY
THE SPEAKERS’ FIRMS TO BE USED, AND CANNOT BE USED, BY A CLIENT OR ANY
OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF (i) AVOIDING PENALTIES THAT
MAY BE IMPOSED ON ANY TAXPAYER OR (ii) PROMOTING, MARKETING OR
RECOMMENDING TO ANOTHER PARTY ANY MATTERS ADDRESSED HEREIN.
You (and your employees, representatives, or agents) may disclose to any and all persons,
without limitation, the tax treatment or tax structure, or both, of any transaction
described in the associated materials we provide to you, including, but not limited to,
any tax opinions, memoranda, or other tax analyses contained in those materials.
The information contained herein is of a general nature and based on authorities that are
subject to change. Applicability of the information to specific situations should be
determined through consultation with your tax adviser.
OVERVIEW OF KEY CONCEPTS
Silvia Flores, Alvarez & Marsal Taxand
U.S. TRADE OR BUSINESS ISSUES
U.S. Trade Or Business Issues
US Branch
Business Profits
Foreign
Corporation
Interest, Dividends,
Capital Gains
US Subsidiary
Interest & Dividends
Royalties
Rents
10
U.S. Trade Or Business: Defined
• When a foreign person’s activities within the U.S. are
considerable, continuous and regular:
― There is no statutory definition; rather, it depends on the
facts and circumstances.
― Regular and active solicitation in the U.S. was sufficient to
consider a taxpayer engaged in a U.S. trade or business.
• Effects of agents:
― Activities of an independent agent (e.g., U.S. distributor)
generally are not attributed to the foreign principal.
― Activities of a dependent agent (e.g., employee) are
attributed to the foreign principal.
11
U.S. Trade Or Business: Defined (Cont.)
• Partnership engaged in a U.S. trade or business:
― Each partner (including a foreign person) is considered to
be engaged in a U.S. trade or business
• U.S. subsidiary corporation:
― Activities are generally not attributed to a foreign parent
corporation.
12
U.S. Trade Or Business (Cont.)
Taxed on Effectively Connected Income
Net Basis
Secs. 1 or 11 rates
Yes
Taxed on US Source FDAP Income
Subject to exceptions
US Source non-FDAP income not
subject to US income tax
No
Foreign Person Engaged
in US Trade or Business
13
U.S. Taxation Of Foreign Persons Engaged In A USTB
• Territorial approach to business taxation of foreign persons
― The U.S. generally taxes only U.S. source income and certain foreign-
source income (i.e. involving U.S. office or its assets).
― It must be established that there is a U.S. trade or business before
foreign persons are subject to tax in the U.S. on business income.
• U.S. branch vs. U.S. subsidiary
― A U.S. branch subjects foreign parent to taxation and reporting in
the U.S. (e.g., Form 1120-F), plus additional provisions (e.g., branch
profits tax).
― A U.S. subsidiary is subject to normal U.S. corporate income taxation
with increased reporting requirements (e.g., Form 5472).
14
U.S. Trade Or Business Exceptions
• Performance of personal services are treated as a “trade or
business,” unless the de minimis exception applies (90
days/$3,000).
• Trade or business does not include certain trading in stock,
securities or commodities.
• Consider income tax treaties
15
SOURCE OF INCOME RULES
Source Of Income Rules
• In general:
― Interest income is sourced pursuant to the residence of
the obligor.
― Dividend income is sourced according to the residence of
the payor.
― Services income is sourced where the services are
performed.
― Rents from lessees of tangible personal/real property are
sourced where the property is located.
― Royalties from licensees of intangible personal property
are sourced where the intangibles are used.
17
Source Of Income Rules: Example
• Example:
A foreign corporation provides architectural services in the
U.S. for a construction project. Under U.S. law, the income
from the services is sourced where the services are
performed, in this case to the U.Ss.
18
Sale Of Inventory Property
• Sale of inventory property
― Sale of purchased inventory is sourced in the country
where the sale takes place. The sale is deemed to take
place where title passes.
― When the seller produces the property, the income must
be apportioned between the country of production and
the country of sale (referred to as “Sect. 863(b) income”).
Seller must source the gross income under a 50/50
allocation method, unless another method is elected.
Other methods are independent factory price and separate
books and records.
19
Sale Of Personal Property
• Sale of personal property other than inventory
― Sourced at the residence of the seller
― Gain on the sale of depreciable personal property is sourced
according to the prior depreciation deduction, to the extent of
the deductions. An excess is sourced the same as the sale of
inventory (country where the sale takes place).
― Gain on the sale of intangibles is sourced according to prior
amortization deductions ,to the extent of deductions.
Contingent payments are sourced as royalty income (country
where the intangibles are used).
― Generally, gain attributable to an office or fixed place of
business maintained outside the U.S., by a U.S. resident, is
foreign-source income.
― Sourcing of losses depends on the nature of the property
20
FDAP INCOME
FDAP
• Fixed or determinable annual or periodical income derived from
sources within the U.S. by foreign persons
• FDAP income can be a lump-sum payment or a series of payments.
• Generally includes:
• Interest
• Dividends
• Rents
• Royalties
• Premiums
• Annuities
22
FDAP (Cont.)
• Tax rate is 30% (or lower treaty rate) collected via
withholding. Tax is imposed on a gross basis (i.e. no
deductions allowed).
• Major exceptions from tax withholding:
• ECI FDAP income
• Portfolio interest
• Interest from bank deposits
23
EFFECTIVELY CONNECTED INCOME (INCLUDING FIRPTA)
Effectively Connected Income
• Income effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business includes
the following:
― U.S.-source business income, such as income from inventory
sales and performing services
― Certain types of U.S.-source FDAP income such as interest on
working capital, dividends earned by a dealer in securities, and
royalties from an active licensing business
― Force of attraction rule
― Certain foreign source income for which a U.S. office exists, and
such income is attributable to the U.S. office
― Deductions are allowable in arriving at ECI.
25
Effectively Connected Income (Cont.)
• In order for deductions to be allowed in arriving at ECI, the
taxpayer must timely file (within 18 months of the original
due date) a U.S. income tax return. If a return is not filed, the
IRS takes the position that it can tax the taxpayer on its gross
ECI income and thus disallow any deductions.
26
Withholding Tax Required By § 1446 On ECI
• If a U.S. partnership has ECI allocated to a foreign partner, the partnership is required to withhold at the highest applicable rate.
― Taxes withheld are treated as estimated tax payments.
― Taxes withheld are treated as partnership distributions.
• The following forms must be filed to report the withholding amounts by a partnership:
― Form 8804 (annual return for partnership withholding tax), Sect. 1446
― Form 8805 (foreign partner’s information statement of Section 1446 withholding tax)
― Form 8813 (partnership withholding tax payment voucher)
― A foreign partner that submits a Form W-8BEN for
1441 withholding tax purposes typically satisfies the documentation requirements under
1446.
27
U.S.-Source FDAP Income
• U.S.-source FDAP (fixed, determinable, annual or periodic) income is
treated as ECI if it meets either of the following two tests:
― Asset use test: FDAP income is derived from assets used or held
for use in a U.S. trade or business.
― Business activities test: Activities of a U.S. trade or business are
a material factor in generating the FDAP income.
• Capital gain income can also be ECI under the same principles.
If FDAP income is ECI, it is not subject to the
1441
withholding regime
28
FIRPTA: General Principles
• Foreign persons are generally not subject to U.S. income tax on
capital gains (exceptions include ECI capital gains). However, FIRPTA
treats the gain on a disposition of an interest in U.S. real property as
effectively connected income subject to regular federal income tax.
• FIRPTA requires buyers of U.S. real property interests to withhold 10%
of the sales price. The seller may apply to the IRS to reduce this 10%
to the amount of tax estimated to be due.
• FIRPTA applies in virtually all cases in which a foreign owner of a U.S.
real property interest disposes of that interest. Provisions of the law
which would prevent recognition of gain generally do not apply,
unless the seller receives a U.S. real property interest in a qualifying
non-recognition exchange.
29
U.S. Real Property Interest
• Real property located in the U.S. includes the following:
― Direct (land, buildings, natural resources, options, etc.)
― Indirect (partnership, estates, trusts)
― Certain associated personal property
― Any interest (other than solely as a creditor) in a domestic
corporation unless the taxpayer establishes that such corporation
was not a U.S. real property holding corporation at any time
within the past five years. It should be emphasized that the
corporation is treated as a USRPI, unless the taxpayer can
demonstrate otherwise
―Includes foreign corporation that has elected to be treated as a
domestic corporation for FIRPTA purposes [
897(i) election]
30
BRANCH PROFIT TAX
Branch Level Taxes: Policy Objective
Equalize treatment of U.S. branches and subsidiaries
Foreign
Parent
Corporation
$ payment
(intra-company
transfer)
U.S.
Branch
Foreign
Parent
Corporation
$ payment
(interest or
dividend)
U.S.
Subsidiary
32
Branch Profits Tax
• Branch profits tax is a branch-level tax of 30% on the repatriation of earnings, in the form of dividends, from a foreign corporation’s branch in the U.S. to the home office in a foreign country.
• This tax is also applied to excess interest on U.S. ECI at a rate of 30%.
• Only imposed on foreign corporations that have a U.S. trade or business
• The foreign corporation does not need a physical presence in the U.S. for the tax to apply.
• The amount of branch profits tax under a treaty is determined by either the branch profits tax amount or the dividend rate specified in the treaty.
33
U.S. Net Equity
• U.S. net equity = U.S. assets less U.S. liabilities
• U.S. assets are:
― Assets of the foreign corporation that produce U.S.
effectively connected income
― Adjusted basis used for E&P purposes
• U.S. liabilities are:
― Liabilities of the foreign corporation treated as connected
with the conduct of a trade or business in the U.S.
― Special rules in the regulations for calculating U.S.
liabilities
34
Computing Branch Profits Tax Current Year US Effectively Connected E&P
+ Decrease in US Net Equity*
or
- Increase in US Net Equity
Dividend Equivalent Amount (DEA)
x 30% rate (or lower treaty rate)
Branch Profits Tax
*Decrease add-back limited to accumulated effectively connected E&P as of the close of the prior year [§884(b)(2)(B)]
35
EFFECTS OF TAX TREATIES
Treaty Benefits
• Residency
• Limitation on benefits clause
• Sect. 894 determines which treaty is applicable in cases for
which treaty shopping may be an issue, and requires a
determination of which entity is the beneficial owner of the
income for foreign tax purposes.
• Form 8833
37
Permanent Establishment
• Higher threshold than the generic “trade or business” test
• Requires a fixed place of business, to include:
― Place of management
― Branch
― Office
― Factory
― Workshop
38
Permanent Establishment (Cont.)
• Permanent establishment excludes:
― Facility for maintenance of goods solely for storage,
display or delivery
― Maintenance of a fixed place of business solely for
carrying on activities that are preparatory or auxiliary in
nature
― Engagement of broker or agent of independent status
― Certain temporary projects
― Subsidiary of parent, unless parent carries on business
itself
39
• An enterprise shall not be deemed to have PE as a result of carrying
on a business through a broker or other independent agent who is
acting in the ordinary course of their business.
• A dependent agent who exercises authority to conclude contracts in
the name of the enterprise, will normally create a PE for the
enterprise on whose behalf the agent is acting.
• Construction PE
• Services PE
Permanent Establishment (Cont.)
40
Business Profits Attributable To A PE
• Business profits are taxable only in the country of residence, unless
the enterprise carries on and the income is attributable to a
permanent establishment.
― Treaty taxes a PE as if a distinct and independent enterprise
engaged in the same or similar activities
― Note the difference from general “force of attraction” rule with
ECI
• In determining business profits, expenses are allowed as deductions
that are incurred for the purposes of the permanent establishment.
― That includes an appropriate allocation of head office expenses
― IRS takes the views that branch head office transactions are not
recognized, and that interest allocable to the U.S. PE is done
under U.S. tax principles.
41
FACT PATTERNS WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR INBOUND INVESTMENT FORMS
Juan Carlos Ferrucho, Alvarez & Marsal Taxand
James Sams, KPMG
INDUSTRY OR ACTIVITY FACT PATTERNS
Communications, Space And Ocean
44
Communications Activities
• Sect. 863(e) defines international
communications income as all income
derived from the transmission of
communications or data from the U.S.
to any foreign country (or possession of
the U.S.), or from any foreign country
(or possession of the U.S.) to the U.S.
• U.S. person – 50/50 sourcing (no
exception in statute)
• Foreign person – except as provided in
regulations, foreign-source unless
attributable to a U.S. office or fixed
place of business maintained by the
foreign person
45
Communications Activities (Cont.)
• Final regulations (Treas. Reg.
1.863-9) effective 2007 add new categories of
income from “communications activities.”
• Define “communications activity” – delivery by transmission, provision of
capacity to transmit to transmit
• Provision of content or additional services with, or in connection with, a
non-de minimis communications activity must be separated.
• Determine type of “communications activity” – identify two points between
which the taxpayer is “paid to transmit” the communication
• International communications
• U.S. communications
• Foreign communications
• Space and ocean communications
• Burden is on the taxpayer to prove ending points through consistently applied
reasonable methods, or face a U.S.-source rule.
46
Communications Activities (Cont.)
• Source may be based on “functions performed, resources
employed, or risks assumed.”
• ICI – foreign person general rule
• ICI – CFC 50/50
• ICI – foreign person maintaining US office or fixed place of
business (see
864(c)(5))
• ICI – foreign person with U.S. trade or business (treaty?)
• Source of space and ocean communications income – see space
and ocean regulations Treas. Reg.
1.863-8
• Determine taxable income from communications activities by
apportioning losses, expenses and other deductions
47
Space And Ocean Activities
• Sect. 863 defines space and ocean
activity as any activity conducted in
space and any activity conducted on or
under water, not within the jurisdiction
(as recognized by the U.S.) of a foreign
country, possession of the U.S., or the
U.S.
• Generally, any space and ocean income
derived by a U.S. person is sourced in
the U.S., and any space and ocean
income derived by a foreign person is
foreign -source.
• Exceptions for transportation,
international communications and
mining, oil, etc.
48
• Except as provided in the regulations, space and ocean income
derived by a U.S. person is U.S.-source income, and income
derived by a foreign person is foreign-source income.
• Regulations provide that source (“source rule”) may be based
on “functions performed, resources employed, or risks
assumed”
• Foreign-source for U.S. person or CFC with functions, risks
or resources in a foreign country
• U.S.-source for foreign person with U.S. trade or business
and functions, risks or resources in the U.S.
• Special sourcing rules for income from services,
communications activities and certain sales of property
Space And Ocean Activities (Cont.)
49
• Service is considered entirely space and
ocean activity when any part of the service
is performed in space or international
waters. De minimis exception applies when
the value of space and ocean services is
immaterial.
• Functions are performed, resources are
employed, or risks are assumed in space or
international waters; regardless of whether
performed by personnel, equipment or
otherwise (“character rule” as
distinguished from “source rule”)
• Taxpayer may treat only a portion of
service as space and ocean, if it can show
the allocation of the value between space
and ocean and outside space and ocean.
Space And Ocean Activities (Cont.)
50
• Activities performed by another person are generally not attributed to the
taxpayer, for purposes of determining the taxpayer’s income from space and
ocean activities.
• Content provider vs. satellite capacity delivery
• Treasury Reg. 1.863-8 provides specific rules for income from property
produced by the taxpayer, in whole or in part, in space or on or underwater
not within the jurisdiction of a foreign country, possession or the U.S., or
from the sale of property in space or international water. (See Treas. Reg. 1.863-3).
• Purchased property sold in space or international water follows the same
sourcing rules as income from space and ocean activities, unless it is
inventory property.
• Purchase inventory property follows the “title passage” rule if it is sold
for use, consumption or disposition outside of space or international
water, and there is no motive to avoid tax.
Space And Ocean Activities (Cont.)
51
• If a taxpayer produces and sells property, then allocate income using a 50/50
method.
• If the production income and/or the sales income is from space and ocean
activities, then the sourcing for that portion of the income will be under the
regulations for space and ocean income.
• If production occurs both in and outside space and international waters, then
one should apportion production income using a functions performed,
resources employed or risks assumed analysis. Sourcing of the space and
international waters portion is done under the general sourcing rules for
space and ocean income.
• If the sales activity is entirely outside space and international waters, then
the sales income is sourced outside the space and ocean income rules (i.e.
title passage, etc.). If the sales is within space and international waters,
then use the general rules for sourcing the income (except if inventory
property is for use, consumption and disposition outside space and
international waters, and the U.S., then use “title passage, etc.”).
Space And Ocean Activities (Cont.)
52
Electronic Commerce
53
Electronic Commerce (Cont.)
• Traditionally, the concept of PE required some physical presence in
the country seeking to impose tax.
• However, it is no longer necessary for companies to have a physical
place of business in a country in order to sell products or services in
that country.
• Many companies use the Internet as their sole sales mechanism.
• There is a lack of consensus among the worldwide taxing authorities
as to what constitutes a PE in the context of e-commerce.
• Countries are taking inconsistent positions on whether the location of
a Web site on a server in a country can constitute a PE, increasing
the risk of double-taxation.
54
Electronic Commerce (Cont.)
• To date, there is no direct U.S. authority guidance discussion whether a person’s
activities constitute a PE in situations involving e-commerce.
• OECD’s views on the taxation of e-commerce has not been released yet; however,
the following insights have been provided:
• Web sites should not constitute PEs.
• Web site hosting facilities should not produce PEs for the entity carrying on
business through the site.
• Internet service providers should not represent an agency position and give
rise to a PE.
• Servers located in a jurisdiction for a suitable long period may be considered
fixed and constitute a PE.
• The OECD’s stance seems to be that a server may only constitute a PE when the
automatic functions carried out by the equipment have been set up by the
principal enterprise and continue to be operated, controlled and maintained by
the same principal enterprise.
55
Distribution Ad Sales Activities
56
• Attribution of U.S. trade or business through agents
• Exclusive or dependent agents may create a trade or business for
foreign principal depending on the activities involved.
• Independent agents generally should not create a trade or
business.
• U.S. activity related to sales and marketing
• Facts and circumstances
• Repeated vs. isolated sales
• Extent of solicitation, marketing, negotiation and other
relationship activities
• Maintenance of inventory, displays, warehouse, logistics and
other related support activities
Distribution And Sales Activities (Cont.)
57
U.S. Marketing And Sales Function (Example)
• Spanish resident company sells products to U.S. resident customers.
• Inventory purchased or produced in Spain. Final decision-making about sales is in Spain.
• Company will hire a U.S. sales agent working from home, but there is no office or office space for the company.
• Employee will promote products, attend trade shows, engage in marketing campaign, gather market data, identify target clients and solicit sales.
• All customer orders will go directly to Spain for review, credit terms and final approval. Spain will also handle warranty and follow-up customer relationship management.
58
U.S. Marketing And Sales Function (Example), Cont.
• Example (Cont.):
• Unlikely to be a permanent establishment under the U.S.-Spanish Treaty, assuming Spanish company meets the limitation on benefits clause
• Spanish company will need to comply with:
• U.S. tax identification requirements(federal and state)
• U.S. bank account for expenses and payroll
• U.S. payroll obligations
• U.S. sales and use tax issues
• State and local income tax issues (assuming nexus is created) or capital or other type of non-income taxes
• File U.S. tax return with treaty based return position
59
Stewardship
• A foreign holding company generally
should not be considered to be
engaged in a U.S. trade or business
solely as a result of its directors,
officers, or employees:
― Exercising management
oversight and stewardship of
the company's investment in a
U.S. operating subsidiary, or
― Investigating business
opportunities in the U.S. such
as potential acquisitions or
sales of subsidiaries.
60
© 2012 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the US member firm of the KPMG network of independent
member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
NDPPS 134002
61
**********
ANY TAX ADVICE IN THIS REPORT IS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN BY KPMG TO BE USED, AND CANNOT BE
USED, BY A CLIENT OR ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF (i) AVOIDING PENALTIES THAT
MAY BE IMPOSED ON ANY TAXPAYER OR (ii) PROMOTING, MARKETING OR RECOMMENDING TO ANOTHER
PARTY ANY MATTERS ADDRESSED HEREIN.
Any tax advice in this document is limited to the conclusions specifically set forth herein and is based on the
completeness and accuracy of the stated facts, assumptions and representations. If any of the facts, assumptions or
representations herein is not entirely complete or accurate, it is imperative that we be informed immediately, as the
inaccuracy or incompleteness could have a material effect on our conclusions. In rendering our advice, we are relying
upon the relevant provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, state and local tax statutes, the
regulations thereunder, and the judicial and administrative interpretations thereof. These authorities are subject to
change, retroactively and/or prospectively and any such changes could affect the validity of our advice. We will not update
our advice for subsequent changes or modifications to the law and regulations, or to the judicial and administrative
interpretations thereof.
© 2012 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the US member firm of the KPMG network of independent
member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
NDPPS 134002
62
Agenda For Next Part Of Presentation
• IRC
875(a)(1) – U.S. trade or business of foreign partners through a
partnership
Application of
875(a)(1) to foreign limited partners
Permanent establishment of foreign partners through a partnership
• Disposition of interest in a partnership with a U.S. trade or business
by a foreign partner
• Revenue Ruling 91-32
• Activities of investment funds
• GLAM 2009-10
• U.S. trade or business created through agency - InverWorld
© 2012 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the US member firm of the KPMG network of independent
member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
NDPPS 134002
63
The statute: “A nonresident alien individual or foreign corporation shall be considered as being engaged in a trade or business within the United States if the partnership of which such individual or corporation is a member is so engaged.”
Foreign
Corporation
Foreign
Individual
USTB
Partnership
Sect. 875(1) – Creation Of A U.S. Trade Or Business
Through A Partnership Interest
© 2012 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the US member firm of the KPMG network of independent
member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
NDPPS 134002
64
Foreign
Corporation
(LP)
Foreign
Individual
(LP)
USTB
Partnership
Unger v. CIR: A non-resident alien individual limited partner was treated as having a permanent establishment by reason of the partnership’s U.S. permanent establishment in the U.S. Thus, the individual was taxed on his distributive share of the partnership’s long-term capital gain from the sale of real estate situated in the U.S.
Donroy v. CIR: Foreign corporate limited partners in a U.S. limited partnership were treated as having a permanent establishment in the U.S. by reason of the limited partnership’s permanent establishment in the U.S.
General
Partner
Attribution Of A U.S. Permanent Establishment
To Limited Partners
© 2012 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the US member firm of the KPMG network of independent
member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
NDPPS 134002
65
Foreign
Corporation
(Seller)
USTB
Partnership
Rev. Rul. 91-32: If a foreign partner sells an interest in a partnership that carries on a U.S. trade or business (or is a permanent establishment under a treaty), Rev. Rul. 91-32 provides rules for determining the portion of the gain or loss that is effectively connected to the U.S. trade or business (or attributable to the permanent establishment).
For this purpose, the foreign partner is treated as if the partnership sold its assets, and the foreign partner received its distributive share of the resulting gain or loss.
Purchaser of
Partnership
Interest
Disposition Of Interest In A Partnership That Has A
U.S. Trade Or Business By A Foreign Partner
© 2012 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the US member firm of the KPMG network of independent
member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
NDPPS 134002
66
Disposition Of Interest In A Partnership:
Application Of Rev. Rul. 91-32
In applying Rev Rul. 91-32 there are five basic principles
1. Cannot net gains and losses from the effectively connected and non-
effectively connected pools
2. If loss on actual disposition, but net effectively connected gain on hypo
disposition, then the actual loss is a non-effectively connected loss. If gain on
actual disposition, but net effectively connected loss on hypo disposition, then
the actual gain is non-effectively connected gain
3. There is a rebuttable presumption that gain is effectively connected to a U.S.
trade or business, and that a loss is not effectively connected.
4. U.S. real property of the partnership is not considered within the Rev. Rul. 91-
32 calculation. Instead, the foreign partner will apply the rules of Sect. 897(g),
which apply the Sect. 897 tax regime to the portion of the partnership interest
related to the U.S. real property.
5. Any property contributed by the foreign partner in anticipation of the
disposition of its partnership interest with the purpose to gaining a U.S. tax
benefit may be disregarded by the IRS.
© 2012 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the US member firm of the KPMG network of independent
member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
NDPPS 134002
67
Disposition Of Interest In A Partnership:
Application Of Rev. Rul. 91-32 (Cont.)
The Greenbook, documenting President Obama’s tax reform proposals,
includes the codification of Rev. Rul. 91-32.
Stated reason for codification: Non-resident alien individuals and foreign corporations
may take a position contrary to the holding of Rev. Rul. 91-32, because it is not
explicitly provided for in the Code. The issue of non-taxation is amplified if the
partnership has in effect an election under IRC
754, and can adjust the basis of its
assets upon the transfer of an interest in the partnership to reflect the transferee
partner’s basis in the partnership interest.
The proposal would also codify an enforcement mechanism. Enforcement of Rev. Rul.
91-32 would be accomplished by imposing a 10% withholding tax, to be withheld by
the transferee, on the foreign partner’s amount realized upon disposition. If the
transferee failed to withhold, the partnership itself would be liable for the amount of
under-withholding.
The estimated additional revenue for the government as a result of the codification of
Rev. Rul. 91-32 is $2.561 billion over the next 10 years.
© 2012 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the US member firm of the KPMG network of independent
member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
NDPPS 134002
68
Foreign Lending
Corp.
(no U.S. treaty)
Origination Co.
domestic corp.
Loan agreement
U.S.
Borrowers
Arms-length
fee $$
U.S. loan-
originating
services
Solicitation and
negotiation of loans
Approve /
sign loans
Foreign Corps Lending In The US: GLAM 2009-10
Foreign lending corp. (FLC) will have a trade or business within the U.S. under the following
facts:
• FLC does not have an office or any employees situated within the U.S.
• FLC pays Origination Co. (OC), an unrelated U.S. corporation that has a U.S. office, to
negotiate and solicit loan contracts with U.S. lenders on FLC’s behalf.
• OC sends all loans back to FLC for final approval and execution of the loan agreements
between FLC and the U.S. borrower.
© 2012 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the US member firm of the KPMG network of independent
member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
NDPPS 134002
69
Foreign Lending
Corp.
(no U.S. treaty)
Origination Co.
domestic corp.
Loan agreement
• Although OC cannot conclude contracts on FLC’s behalf, OC is still acting as FLC’s agent.
• The lending activities of FLC constitute a trade or business because they are regular and continuous, and they are situated within the U.S. because FLC is attributed OC’s U.S. activities.
• The interest earned by FLC on the U.S. loans is effectively connected to the U.S. business since it is attributable to the “US office” through which the business is carried on.
• This is a somewhat controversial position, since the U.S. office here is not attributable to FLC under the current regulations because of OC’s lack of signatory power.
U.S.
Borrowers
Arms-length
fee $$
U.S. loan-
originating
services
Solicitation and
negotiation of loans
Approve /
sign loans
Foreign Corps Lending In The
US: GLAM 2009-10 (Cont.)
© 2012 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the US member firm of the KPMG network of independent
member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
NDPPS 134002
70
Foreign Corp
Issues Caused By Foreign Corporations
Directly Operating In The U.S.
U.S. Branch Or
U.S PE
Through
Employees
Key issues created by this structure
• Creates a direct U.S. tax filing/reporting requirement by Foreign Corp (Form 1120-F)
• Allocation of income/expenses to U.S. branch/PE’s activities can be a lengthy and complex process.
• Foreign Corp will be subject to the U.S. branch profits tax (BPT).
• The BPT rules impose a 30% withholding tax on a hypothetical “dividend equivalent amount” from the U.S. branch to the Foreign Corp.
© 2012 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the US member firm of the KPMG network of independent
member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
NDPPS 134002
71
Foreign Corp
(FC)
Use Of A U.S. “Blocker” Subsidiary
To Avoid U.S. Tax Issues
FC’s
Employees
Operating In
U.S.
Creating an intervening “blocker” U.S. subsidiary,
by itself, will not prevent FC from having a USTB,
and being subject to the issues stated in the
previous slide.
Planning around USTB Issues
• Placement of FC employees who will be
working in the U.S. into the U.S. subsidiary
• Limit the direct U.S.-based activity of foreign
parent (e.g., U.S. marketing and sales by direct
employees or officers of foreign parent)
• Review/restructure U.S. customer relationships
so that they are contracting with the U.S.
subsidiary
Transfer pricing: By operating in the U.S. through a
separate regarded entity, FC will now face new
transfer pricing issues arising from inter-company
transactions.
“Blocker”
U.S. Corp
© 2012 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the US member firm of the KPMG network of independent
member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
NDPPS 134002
72
InverWorld Ltd.
foreign corp
InverWorld
Holdings
domestic corp
InverWorld Inc.
domestic corp
Services
exclusively
provided to
related party
InverWorld v Commissioner
• InverWorld Ltd. (LTD) is a foreign
investment management and financial
services company. LTD’s target
customers were in Mexico.
• LTD collected management fees and
other commissions related to investment
opportunities within U.S. financial
markets from its Mexican clientele.
• InverWorld Inc. (INC) maintained LTD’s
client account files, provided investment
advice to LTD, performed bookkeeping
services for LTD, and purchased
investment instruments on behalf of
LTD’s customers, all from its U.S. office.
The Need For Substantial Foreign Activity:
InverWorld v. Commissioner
© 2012 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the US member firm of the KPMG network of independent
member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
NDPPS 134002
73
InverWorld Ltd.
foreign Corp
InverWorld
Holdings
domestic Corp
InverWorld Inc.
domestic Corp
Services
exclusively
provided to
related party
Court ruling and lessons learned from
InverWorld v Commissioner
• The court looked at the aggregate of
LTD’s activities, both foreign and
domestic, to determine LTD’s “real
business.”
• Since a substantial volume of LTD’s
activities, directly and through INC (which
was determined to be acting as its
agent), were related to U.S. financial
markets, LTD was held to have a U.S.
trade or business.
• The court suggests that if LTD had more
activities related to foreign jurisdictions,
that its “real business” may not have
been within the U.S.
The Need For Substantial Foreign Activity:
InverWorld v. Commissioner (Cont.)
APPLICATION OF CONCEPTS WHEN U.S. FORM MUST BE PREPARED
Kimberlee Phelan, WithumSmith+Brown
Carola Knoll, WithumSmith+Brown
WithumSmith+Brown, PC ▪ Certified Public Accountants and Consultants
75 withum.com
Form 1120-F
Filing of U.S. income tax return of a foreign corporation
• Taxpayers engaged in conduct of U.S. trade or business (or that have U.S.-source taxable capital gains ) must file income tax returns.
• Taxpayers not engaged in a U.S. trade or business do not file if all tax is collected by the withholding agent.
• If no exemption applies, the withholding agent (typically, the payor) must withhold the 30% tax and file an information return.
• If a treaty exemption or reduction applies, withholding agent must have certification from payee:
Form W-8 BEN: “beneficial owner” of income and/or entitlement to treaty benefits
• Recipient must file “treaty-based return position disclosure” with IRS on Form 8833 to claim a treaty-based position.
WithumSmith+Brown, PC ▪ Certified Public Accountants and Consultants
76 withum.com
Form 1120-F (Cont.)
Filing of U.S. income tax return of a foreign corporation (Cont.)
• Foreign corporations that carry on business in the U.S. through a
“permanent establishment” (PE) are subject to U.S. tax on a
“net” basis.
Gross income attributable to the PE = effectively connected income
• “Permanent establishment” (PE): Standard definition
Fixed place of business
Dependent agent that has authority and does conclude
contracts
WithumSmith+Brown, PC ▪ Certified Public Accountants and Consultants
77 withum.com
Form 1120-F (Cont.)
U.S. income tax return of a foreign corporation (Cont.)
General rules
Tax base: Effectively connected income (§864(c))
U.S.-source business income
Selected types of foreign-source business income
Selected types of U.S.-source, non-business income
Lookback rules for property dispositions: 10 years, under §864(c)(7)
• Tax rate schedule: Same as domestic corporation
Basis of accounting
• U.S. tax forms are filled out in accordance with U.S. tax accounting principles.
• Taxpayers must convert U.S. GAAP financial records to U.S. tax basis of accounting, by making tax adjustments.
WithumSmith+Brown, PC ▪ Certified Public Accountants and Consultants
78 withum.com
Form 1120-F (Cont.)
U.S. income tax return of a foreign corporation (Cont.)
Interest expense
• A foreign corporation is generally required to use a three-step calculation to determine the amount of interest expense that is allocable under Sect. 882(c) to income effectively connected (or treated as effectively connected) with the foreign corporation’s conduct of a trade or business within the U.S.
• Fungibility principle
Allocate interest to all gross income, even if borrowing relates to specific asset
• Apportionment base
Two methods available: Fair market value or tax book value
864(e)(2)
• Affiliated groups
Treated as a single corporation, for purposes of apportioning interest expense
WithumSmith+Brown, PC ▪ Certified Public Accountants and Consultants
79 withum.com
Form 1120-F (Cont.)
Protective filing of U.S. income tax return on Form 1120-F
• Foreign corporations that do not file a return lose the right to take deductions and credits against “ECI.”
• Under Reg. Sect. 1.882-4(a)(3)(vi), the corporation will preserve its rights to deductions and credits by filing a protective return, if it is later determined that it did have “ECI.”
• Consider filing a “protective” return when:
The foreign corporation has only limited activity in the U.S., and there is no income “effectively connected with a trade or business in the U.S.”
The foreign corporation determines it has no U.S. tax liability under the provisions of an income tax treaty (e.g., when it does not have a permanent establishment in the U.S.).
WithumSmith+Brown, PC ▪ Certified Public Accountants and Consultants
80 withum.com
Form 1120-F (Cont.)
Protective filing of U.S. income tax return of Form 1120-F (Cont.)
• A “protective” Form 1120-F return:
Does not report income or deductions
Statement is attached stipulating that the return is being filed to “protect” the taxpayer’s right to claim deductions and
credits later, if it is determined it has ECI.
If the foreign corporation determines it has no U.S. tax liability
under the provisions of an income tax treaty (e.g., when it
does not have a permanent establishment in the U.S.), then
the Form 8833 must be attached.
WithumSmith+Brown, PC ▪ Certified Public Accountants and Consultants
81 withum.com
Form 8833
Treaty based return position disclosure under sections 6114 or 7701(B)
• Used to disclose treaty-based return position required by Sect.
6114
• Also used by dual-resident taxpayers to make the treaty-based
return position disclosure required by Sect. 301.7701(b)-7
WithumSmith+Brown, PC ▪ Certified Public Accountants and Consultants
82 withum.com
Form 8833 (Cont.
Treaty based return position
• Failure to disclose a treaty-based return position may result in a
penalty of $1,000 ($10,000 in the case of a C corporation)!
• Must disclose each treaty-based position on separate Form 8833
• IRC Sect. 6712
WithumSmith+Brown, PC ▪ Certified Public Accountants and Consultants
83 withum.com
Form 8833 (Cont.)
Income tax treaties
• Generally apply only to residents of a treaty country
• Often include reduced tax rates or exemptions from tax
• Check wording of each treaty! Each is written differently.
• U.S. treaties have a “savings clause.”
• Generally must disclose treaty positions (Form 8833)
• Watch out for states!
WithumSmith+Brown, PC ▪ Certified Public Accountants and Consultants
84 withum.com
Form 8833 (Cont.)
Income tax treaties – used To avoid double-taxation
Commonly used articles for businesses:
• Article 4 – residency (“treaty tie-breaker”)
• Article 5 – permanent establishment (PE)
• Article 7 – business profits
• Article 10 – dividends (5% if > 10%, 15% otherwise)
• Article 11 – interest (0% or 15%)
• Article 14 – independent services (self-employment)
• Article 15 – dependent services (employment/salary)
• Limitation-of-benefits article – must not have “LOB” apply or will not be eligible to claim treaty position
WithumSmith+Brown, PC ▪ Certified Public Accountants and Consultants
85 withum.com
Form 8833 (Cont.)
Treaty based return position
Limitation-of-benefits article - used to prevent “treaty shopping”
Ownership provisions deny benefits to a company that is a resident of
a contracting state, if it is owned or controlled directly or indirectly by
persons who are not residents of a contracting state.
General subject-to-tax provisions provide that treaty benefits in the
state of source are granted only if the income in question is subject to
tax in the state of residence.
For example, a foreign corporation may not be entitled to a reduced
rate of withholding, unless a minimum percentage of its owners are
citizens or residents of the U.S. (or the treaty country).
Some treaties provide that the benefits of the treaty apply if a
“derivative benefits” test is met. Other treaties provide that the
benefits of the treaty apply if a “headquarters company” test is met.
WithumSmith+Brown, PC ▪ Certified Public Accountants and Consultants
86 withum.com
Form 8833 (Cont.)
Treaty based return position (Cont.)
UK limitation-of-benefits Article 23: • Qualification of companies – generally:
Public companies (listed on U.S. or UK stock exchange) Ownership test
• On at least ½ days of taxable period, at least 50% owned (directly or indirectly) by “qualified” shareholders
Base erosion test • Less than 50% of gross income is paid to non-U.S. or UK residents • Payments are deductible in corporation’s jurisdiction
• Qualification of Income Derivative benefits test
• 95% or more of company is owned by seven or fewer “equivalent beneficiaries (member of EU or EEA, or a party to NAFTA)
• Must be resident in EU and “entitled” to benefits Active trade or business test Discretionary determination by competent authority
WithumSmith+Brown, PC ▪ Certified Public Accountants and Consultants
87 withum.com
Form 5472
Information return of a 25% foreign-owned U.S. corporation, or of a foreign corporation engaged in a U.S. trade or business
• Required to be filed when there has been a reportable
transaction during the year with a related party
• Due by extended due date of the U.S. income tax return and filed with that return
• Penalties for non-compliance begin at $10,000,
WithumSmith+Brown, PC ▪ Certified Public Accountants and Consultants
88 withum.com
Form 5472 (Cont.)
Reportable transactions
• Sales and purchases of stock in trade (inventory)
• Sales and purchases of tangible property other than stock-in-trade
• Payment or receipt of rents or royalties (other than amounts reported under (4) below)
• Sales and purchases of intangible property, as well as payment for use of intangible property such as copyrights, patents, processes, trademarks and other similar intangible property rights
• Payment or receipt of consideration for the rendition of technical, managerial, engineering, construction, scientific or other services
• Payment or receipt of commissions
• Loans or borrowing of money
• Payment or receipt of interest
• Payment or receipt of premiums for insurance and reinsurance
WithumSmith+Brown, PC ▪ Certified Public Accountants and Consultants
89 withum.com
Form 5472 (Cont.)
Information return of a 25% foreign-owned U.S. corporation, or of a foreign corporation engaged in a U.S. trade or business (Cont.)
• Not required to be filed if NO reportable transactions during the
year
• Not reportable if neither party to the transaction is a U.S. person under Sect. 7701(a)(30) and the transaction
Won't generate gross income from U.S. sources or deferred
payment or income that is ECI of a U.S. trade or business in any tax year, and
Won't generate in any tax year any expense, loss or other
deduction that is allocable or apportionable to the income