Friday, April 21, 2023
INFORMING AND GUIDING REVIEW AND LEARNING PROCESS UNDER CAADP
THROUGH RESAKSS
OUSMANE BADIANE
Director for Africa
International Food Policy Research Institute
SOURCE: INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 2
CAADP AS STRATEGY RENEWAL AGENDA
• SECURING COMMITMENT BY NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS AND STAKEHOLDERS TO MEET CAADP TARGETS AND PRINCIPLES
• ENSURING THE ALIGNMENT OF DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE WITH CAADP OBJECTIVES AND PRINCIPLES
• DEEPEN POLICY DIALOGUE AND REVIEW TO IMPROVE SECTOR GOVERNANCE
• STRENGTHEN ADVOCACY TO KEEP FOCUS ON AGRICULTURE
THE FOUR RENEWAL AGENDA DOMAINS
SOURCE: INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 3
CAADP AS STRATEGY RENEWAL AGENDA
SOURCE: INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 4
PEER REVIEW AND KNOWLEDGE DIMENSION OF CAADP
BETTER SECTOR POLICIES REQUIRE
EVIDENCE AND OUTCOME BASED PLANNING & IMPLEMENTATION
ACCESS TO AND USE OF BEST POSSIBLE EXPERTISE
TRACKING / MEASURING PERFORMANCE AGAINST GOALS / TARGETS
SOURCE: INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 5
PEER REVIEW AND KNOWLEDGE DIMENSION OF CAADP
ACHIEVING 6% ANNUAL GROWTH REQUIRES
MUCH GREATER EFFICIENCY IN PLANNING AND EXECUTING SECTOR PROGRAMS IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR
SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN THESE EXPENDITURES TO SUSTAINAN ANNUAL GROWTH RATE OF 6%
MORE EFFECTIVE TRANSLATION OF PUBLIC EXPENDITURES INTOPUBLIC GOODS AND ASSETS
SOURCE: INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 6
KNOWLEDGE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROGRAM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS
• PROGRAM DESIGN• PREPARATION OF REGIONAL INVESTMENT FRAMEWORKS• POLICY AND INVESTMENT OPTIONS
• IMPLEMENTATION• POLICY AND STRATEGY OPTIONS• PROGRESS TRACKING• BEST PRACTICES• BENCHMARKING• LEARNING• REVIEW AND DIALOGUE INPUT
• PROGRAM DESIGN•STOCK TAKING AGAINST CAADP TARGETS AND PRINCIPLES
• POLICY AND PROGRAM OPTIONS TO ACHIEVE TARGETS
• INVESTMENT REQUIREMENTS
• IMPLEMENTATION• POLICY AND STRATEGY OPTIONS• PROGRESS TRACKING• BEST PRACTICES• LEARNING• REVIEW AND DIALOGUE INPUT
REGIONAL COMPACTS COUNTRY COMPACTS
SOURCE: INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 7
MECHANISMSFOR PEER REVIEW AND LEARNING
MUTUAL REVIEW
APF CAADP PP
PEER REVIEW
“ADVISORY COUNCIL”
“SUPPORT GROUP”
PROGRESS REVIEW
COUNTRY SPECIFIC• FOCUS ON QUALITY OF POLICIES
• INCLUSIVE DIALOGUE
NATIONAL LEVEL TOOLS
REGIONAL LEVEL TOOLS
CONTINENTAL LEVEL TOOLS
SOURCE: INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 8
ReSAKSS: KNOWLEDGE SUPPORTFOR PLANNING, REVIEW, AND DIALOGUE
STRATEGICANALYSIS
CAADP
NETWORKSSROs/IRCs
COORDINATIONGOVERNANCE
RECs
RegionalSAKSSNodesCGIAR
ENDUSERSLOCALORGs
COUNTRYNODE
NARS/GOVP. SECTOR
COUNTRY LEVELSupport for planning,
Implementation, &Progress Review
REGIONAL LEVELSupport for
Regional Coordination andPeer Review
CONTINENT LEVELSupport for Policy
Dialogue and Mutual Review
SOURCE: INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
RESAKSS STRATEGIC GUIDANCE ROLE
• FLAGSHIP TREND AND OUTLOOK REPORTS
• SPECIAL STUDIES ON EMERGING STRATEGIC ISSUES (CC, BIOFUELS, LANDGRABBING)
• OCCASIONAL REPORTS ON SHOCKS AND
• SIMILAR OCCURENCES (FOOD / FINANCIAL CRISIS)
Page 9
KNOWLEDGE FOR BETTER STRATEGIES
SOURCE: INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 10
RESAKSS REVIEW AND LERANING SUPPORT
MEASURING AND TRACKING FOR BETTER OUTCOMES
• BENCHMARKING INPUTS, OUTPUTS, IMPACT
• PROGRESS AND PROCESS INDICATORS
• SCORECARDS
• BEST PRACTICES
SOURCE: INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
RESAKKS AS KNOWLEDGE BROKER
• NOT A RESEARCH ORGANIZATION • WORK ENCOMPASSES TOO MANY AREAS• NO COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE IN ANY
• BUT CONSOLIDATOR OF KNOWLEDGE• LIMITED RESEARCH AGENDA• FEW FLAGSHIP REPORTS• CUSTOMIZES EXISTING KNOWLEDGE• MANUFACTURES KNOWLEDGE OUT OF
EXISTING DATA
Page 11
SOURCE: INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Page 12
RESAKSS IN THE CAADP AGENDA
RELEVANT AND CREDIBLE INFORMATION
TOP ANALYTICAL EXPERTISE AND AGENDA
TRACKING AND MONITORING SUPPORT
POLICY DIALOGUE SUPPORT
WHAT’S THE VALUE ADDITION ?
SOURCE: INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
DESTINATION RESEAKKS
Page 13