EX.P. 275/2012 Page 1 of 84
$~J-1
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Date of Decision: 5th
August, 2020
+ EX.P. 275/2012 & EX.APPL. (OS) 193/2020
M/S BHANDARI ENGINEERS
& BUILDERS PVT LTD ..... Decree Holder
Through: Mr. S. S. Jauhar, Advocate
versus
M/S MAHARIA RAJ
JOINT VENTURE & ORS ..... Judgement Debtors
Through: Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Senior
Advocate and Mr.Sanjiv Kakra,
Advocate as Amici Curiae
+ EX.P. 276/2012
M/S BHANDARI ENGINEERS
& BUILDERS PVT LTD ..... Decree Holder
Through: Mr. S. S. Jauhar, Advocate
versus
M/S YOU ONE MAHARIA
(JV) DELHI & ORS ..... Judgement Debtors
Through: Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Senior
Advocate and Mr.Sanjiv Kakra,
Advocate as Amici Curiae
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
J U D G M E N T
1. In execution proceeding, the Executing Court has to ascertain the
assets and income of the judgment-debtor to determine, whether the
judgment-debtor has the means to satisfy the money decree. In many
developed countries, the law prescribes a comprehensive format of affidavit
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 2 of 84
of assets, income, expenditure and liabilities to be filed by the judgment-
debtor at the very threshold of execution proceedings to ascertain the
financial means of judgment-debtor. However, Form 16A of Appendix E
under Order XXI Rule 41(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure is not
exhaustive to ascertain all the assets, income, expenditure and liabilities of
the judgment-debtor.
2. Vide judgment dated 05th
December, 2019, this Court, after
considering the best international practices with respect to mandatory filing
of an affidavit of assets, income, expenditure and liabilities by the judgment-
debtor, formulated the formats of affidavits to be filed by the judgment-
debtor at the very threshold of the execution proceedings. This Court also
laid down the guidelines for expeditious hearing and disposal of execution
cases.
3. Vide judgment dated 05th
December, 2019, this Court sought the
response and suggestions of the Courts below as well as the Delhi High
Court Bar Association on the working of the aforesaid guidelines. The Trial
Courts have submitted their response. Suggestions have been received from
the Bar members, which have been considered by this Court.
4. This Court is of the view that the directions issued by this Court in the
judgment dated 05th
December, 2019 and formats of the affidavits
(Annexures A, B and C) formulated by this Court require modification, in
order to make them more comprehensive. The judgment dated 05th
December, 2019, is hereby modified. The modified directions are as under:
Modified Directions
5. Delays and difficulties in execution of decrees/awards erode public
confidence and trust in the justice delivery system. Execution jurisdiction
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 3 of 84
deserves special attention and expeditious disposal considering that the
decree-holders have already succeeded in the litigation and hold a
decree/award in their favour.
6. In Satyawati v. Rajinder Singh, (2013) 9 SCC 491, the Supreme
Court quoted the Privy Council‘s judgment of 1872 that the „difficulties of a
litigant in India begin when he has obtained a decree‟ and observed that the
position has not improved and the decree-holders still face the same
problems. The Supreme Court further observed that if there is an
unreasonable delay in execution of a decree, the decree-holder would be
unable to enjoy the fruits of his success and the entire effort of successful
litigant would be in vain. The relevant observations of the Supreme Court
are reproduced as under: -
―……. In relation to the difficulties faced by a decree-holder in
execution of the decree, in 1872, the Privy Council had
observed [General Manager of the Raj Durbhunga v. Coomar
Ramaput Sing, (1871-72) 14 MIA 605 : 20 ER 912] that: (MIA
p. 612)
―… the difficulties of a litigant in India begin
when he has obtained a decree.‖
2. Even today, in 2013, the position has not been improved and
still the decree-holder faces the same problem which was being
faced in the past……………
xxx xxx xxx
12. It is really agonising to learn that the appellant-decree-
holder is unable to enjoy the fruits of her success even today i.e.
in 2013 though the appellant-plaintiff had finally succeeded in
January 1996. As stated hereinabove, the Privy Council in
General Manager of the Raj Durbhunga v. Coomar Ramaput
Sing, (1871-72) 14 MIA 605 : 20 ER 912] had observed that the
difficulties of a litigant in India begin when he has obtained a
decree. Even in 1925, while quoting the aforestated judgment of
the Privy Council in Kuer Jang Bahadur v. Bank of Upper India
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 4 of 84
Ltd. [AIR 1925 Oudh 448 (PC)] the Court was constrained to
observe that: (AIR p. 448)
―Courts in India have to be careful to see that the
process of the Court and the law of procedure are
not abused by judgment-debtors in such a way as to
make courts of law instrumental in defrauding
creditors, who have obtained decrees in accordance
with their rights.”
13. In spite of the aforestated observation made in 1925, this Court
was again constrained to observe in Babu Lal v. Hazari Lal
Kishori Lal [(1982) 1 SCC 525] in para 29 that: (SCC p. 539)
―29. Procedure is meant to advance the cause of
justice and not to retard it. The difficulty of the
decree-holder starts in getting possession in
pursuance of the decree obtained by him. The
judgment-debtor tries to thwart the execution by
all possible objections.”
xxx xxx xxx
16. ……… the position has not been improved till today. We
strongly feel that there should not be unreasonable delay in
execution of a decree because if the decree-holder is unable to
enjoy the fruits of his success by getting the decree executed,
the entire effort of successful litigant would be in vain.” (Emphasis Supplied)
7. Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure lays down the procedure
for the execution of the decree. Order XXI Rule 1(b) of the Code of Civil
Procedure enables the judgment-debtor to directly pay the decretal amount
to the decree-holder. Order XXI Rule 1(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure
gives an option to the judgment-debtor to deposit the decretal/award amount
with the Executing Court and give the notice of deposit to the decree-holder
under Order XXI Rule 1(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure. Thus, in an
ideal situation, the judgment-debtor is supposed to satisfy the decree/award
without waiting for the institution of an execution case. For example, after
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 5 of 84
the awards are passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunals in motor
accident claims, the insurance companies voluntarily deposit the award
amounts with the Claims Tribunal.
8. If the judgment-debtor does not voluntarily satisfy the decree/award,
the decree-holder is compelled to initiate the execution proceedings. If the
decree-holder is aware of the assets of the judgment-debtor, the Executing
Court attaches the assets at the very threshold of the execution proceedings.
The Executing Court thereafter initiates proceedings for sale of the attached
assets of the judgment-debtor.
9. If the decree-holder is not aware of the complete assets and income of
the judgment-debtor, the Executing Court directs the judgment-debtor to
disclose his assets in Form 16A of Appendix E under Order XXI Rule 41(2)
of the Code of Civil Procedure.
10. Form 16A of Appendix E under Order XXI Rule 41(2) of the Code of
Civil Procedure is not exhaustive to ascertain all the assets and income of the
judgment-debtor. As a result, the execution proceedings keep on lingering at
the mercy of the judgment-debtor.
11. In many countries namely United Kingdom, U.S.A, Canada,
Australia, Singapore, Ireland, New Zealand and South Africa, the law
prescribes a mandatory comprehensive format of assets, income, expenditure
and liabilities to be filed by the judgment-debtor.
12. This Court is satisfied that there is an urgent need to formulate a
detailed format of affidavit of assets and income to be filed by the judgment-
debtor at the very threshold of the execution proceedings to curb the delay
and expedite the disposal of execution proceedings.
13. Justice is the ideal to be achieved by law. Justice is the goal of law.
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 6 of 84
‗Law as it is‘, may fall short of 'Law as it ought to be' for doing complete
justice in a cause. The gap between the two gives an occasion to the Court
to develop the law by evolving juristic principles for doing complete justice
according to the current needs of the society. J.S. Verma, former CJI, in his
lecture titled “New Dimensions of Justice”, (1997) 3 SCC J3 observed that: -
―Law, Justice and Morality
Justice is the ideal to be achieved by Law. Justice is the goal of
law. Law is a set of general rules applied in the administration
of Justice. Justice is in a cause and depends on application of
law to a particular case. Jurisprudence is the philosophy of
law. Jurisprudence and Law have ultimately to be tested on the
anvil of administration of justice. "Law as it is" may fall short
of "Law as it ought to be" for doing complete justice in a cause.
The gap between the two may be described as the field covered
by Morality. There is no doubt that the development of the law
is influenced by morals. The infusion of morality for reshaping
the law is influenced by the principles of Equity and Natural
Justice, as effective agencies of growth. The ideal state is when
the rules of law satisfy the requirements of justice and the gap
between the two is bridged.
It is this attempt to bridge the gap which occasions the
development of New Jurisprudence.
Existing Gaps
The existence of some gap between law and justice is
recognised by the existing law itself. This is the reason for the
recognition of inherent powers of the court by express provision
made in the Code of Civil Procedure and the Code of Criminal
Procedure‖
(Emphasis Supplied)
14. Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure empowers this Court to
make such orders as may be necessary to secure ends of justice or to prevent
the abuse of process of the Court in exercise of its inherent powers. The
power under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure is extraordinary in
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 7 of 84
its nature and is to be exercised to do real and substantial justice, for which
the Courts exist. Article 227 of the Constitution confers on this Court the
power of superintendence over the subordinate Courts. The paramount
consideration behind vesting such wide power of superintendence in this
Court is to keep the path of justice clear of obstructions which would impede
it. It is the salutary duty of this Court to prevent the abuse of the process,
miscarriage of justice and to correct the irregularities in the judicial process.
15. In exercise of powers under Sections 30 and 151 and Order XXI Rule
41 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Sections 106 and 165 of the
Indian Evidence Act and Article 227 of the Constitution of India, this Court
has formulated the formats of affidavit of assets, income, expenditure and
liabilities to be mandatorily filed by the judgment-debtor in execution cases.
16. The modified format of affidavit of assets and income of the
judgment-debtor is Annexure A1 hereto. The modified format of affidavit of
assets and income of a proprietorship firm/partnership firm/HUF/Company
/Trust as a judgment-debtor is Annexure B1 hereto. The modified format of
the affidavit of expenditure of the judgment-debtor is Annexure C1 hereto.
17. The aforesaid three affidavits, namely Annexures A1, B1 and C1 are
very comprehensive and they give a complete overview of the entire assets,
income, expenditure and liabilities as well as standard of living of the
judgment-debtor.
Relevant Legal Provisions
18. Order XXI Rule 41(2) of Code of Civil Procedure – Judgment-debtor
to Disclose Assets
Order XXI Rule 41(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure empowers the
Executing Court to direct the judgment-debtor to disclose his assets on
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 8 of 84
affidavit in Form 16A of Appendix E to ascertain his assets/means to satisfy
the decree. Order XXI Rule 41(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure is
reproduced herein below: -
“Order XXI Rule 41
(1)…………………
(2) Where a decree for the payment of money has remained
unsatisfied for a period of thirty days, the Court may, on the
application of the decree-holder and without prejudice to its
power under sub-rule (1), by order require the judgment-debtor
or where the judgment-debtor is a corporation, any officer
thereof, to make an affidavit stating the particulars of the assets
of the judgment-debtor.‖
19. Form 16A of Appendix E of Code of Civil Procedure – Format of
Affidavit of Assets
Form 16A of Appendix E of the Code of Civil Procedure is the format of the
affidavit of assets to be filed by the judgment-debtor, which is reproduced
herein below: -
―[No. 16A
Affidavit of Assets to be made by a Judgment-debtor
[O. XXI, r.41(2)]
In the Court of
A.B……… .................................…………………………. Decree-holder.
Versus
C.D..............................……… ………………………….. Judgment-debtor.
I………………….. of …………………..state on Oath/solemn affirmation as follows:-
1. My full name is …………………………………… (Block Capitals)
2. I live at
3. I am*……………………married/single/widower (widow)/ divorced
4. The following persons are dependant upon me:-
5. My employment, trade or profession is that of ……………..carried on by me at
…………………………………………………………….
I am a director of the following companies:-
6. My present annual/monthly/weekly income, after paying income-tax, is as follows:-
(a) From my employment, trade or profession Rs…………
(b) From other sources Rs…………
7. *(a) I own the house in which I live; its value is Rs……………
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 9 of 84
I pay as outgoings by way of rates, mortgage, interest, etc., the annual sum of
Rs……………
(b) I pay as rent the annual sum of Rs……………….
8. I possess the following:-
(a) Banking accounts;
(b) Stocks and shares;
(c) Life and endowment policies; Give particulars
(d) House property;
(e) Other property;
(f) Other securities;
9. The following debts are due to me:-
(give particulars)
(a) Form ……. of ………………………
Rs.
(b) From …….of ………………………
Rs……. .(etc.)
Sworn before me, etc. ]
*Strike off the word which are not applicable‖
20. Order XXI Rule 41(1) of Code of Civil Procedure – Oral Examination
of Judgment-Debtor
Order XXI Rule 41(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure empowers the
Executing Court to orally examine the judgment-debtor. Order XXI Rule
41(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure is reproduced hereunder: -
“Order XXI Rule 41(1) - Examination of judgment-debtor as
to his property
(1) Where a decree is for the payment of money the decree-
holder may apply to the Court for an order that
(a) the judgment-debtor, or
(b) where the judgment-debtor is a corporation, any officer
thereof, or
(c) any other person, be orally examined as to whether any or
what debts are owing to the judgment-debtor and whether the
judgment-debtor has any and what other property or means of
satisfying the decree; and the Court may make an order for the
attendance and examination of such judgment-debtor, or officer
or other person, and for the production of any books or
documents.‖
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 10 of 84
(Emphasis Supplied)
21. Order XXI Rule 41(3) of Code of Civil Procedure - Detention of
Judgment-Debtor
In the event of the judgment-debtor‟s default to file the affidavit of assets,
Order XXI Rule 41(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure empowers the Court to
detain the judgment-debtor in civil prison for up to three months. Order XXI
Rule 41(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure is reproduced below: -
“Order XXI Rule 41(3)
(3) In case of disobedience of any order made under sub-rule
(2), the Court making the order, or any Court to which the
proceeding is transferred, may direct that the person disobeying
the order be detained in the civil prison for a term not
exceeding three month unless before the expiry of such terms
the Court directs his release.‖
22. Arrest and Detention of the Judgment-Debtor
Sections 51(c), 55 to 59 and Order XXI Rules 37 to 40 of the Code of Civil
Procedure prescribe the procedure to be followed for detention of the
judgment-debtor in the civil prison. Section 55 contains the provision
relating to arrest and detention; Section 56 contains the provision relating to
prohibition of arrest and detention of women; Section 58 contains the
provision relating to duration of detention and release; Section 59 contains
the provision relating to release on the ground of illness; Order XXI Rule 37
contains provision for show cause notice to the judgment-debtor against
detention in the civil prison; Order XXI Rule 38 contains the provision
relating to warrants of arrest to the judgment-debtor; Section 57 and Order
XXI Rule 39 contains the provisions relating to subsistence allowance for
the judgment-debtor and Order XXI Rule 40 contains the provision relating
to proceedings on appearance of the judgment-debtor.
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 11 of 84
23. Attachment of Property in Execution of Decrees
Sections 51(b), 60 to 64 and Order XXI Rules 41 to 57 of the Code of Civil
Procedure contain provisions for attachment of properties in execution of
decrees. Section 60 gives the list of properties which are liable to
attachment and sale whereas the Proviso to Sub-Section (1) of Section 60
gives the list of properties which are exempted from attachment or sale.
Section 60 of the Code of Civil Procedure is reproduced hereunder:
―Section 60 - Property liable to attachment and sale in
execution of decree.
(1) The following property is liable to attachment and sale in
execution of a decree, namely, lands, houses or other buildings,
goods, money, bank-notes, cheques, bills of exchange, hundis,
promissory notes, Government securities, bonds or other
securities for money, debts, shares in a corporation and save as
hereinafter mentioned, all other saleable property, movable or
immovable, belonging to the judgment-debtor, or over which,
or the profits of which, he has a disposing power which he may
exercise for his own benefit, whether the same be held in the
name of the judgment-debtor or by another person in trust for
him or on his behalf:
Provided that the following particulars shall not be liable to
such attachment or sale, namely:—
(a) the necessary wearing-apparel, cooking vessels, beds and
bedding of the judgment-debtor, his wife and children, and such
personal ornaments as, in accordance with religious usage,
cannot be parted with by any woman;
(b) tools of artisans, and, where the judgment-debtor is an
agriculturist, his implements of husbandry and such cattle and
seed-grain as may, in the opinion of the Court, be necessary to
enable him to earn his livelihood as such, and such portion of
agricultural produce or of any class of agricultural produce as
may have been declared to be free from liability under the
provisions of the next following section;
(c) houses and other buildings (with the materials and the sites
thereof and the land immediately appurtenant thereto and
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 12 of 84
necessary for their enjoyment) belonging to an agriculturist or
a labourer or a domestic servant and occupied by him;
(d) books of account;
(e) a mere right to sue for damages;
(f) any right of personal service;
(g) stipends and gratuities allowed to pensioners of the
Government or of a local authority or of any other employer, or
payable out of any service family pension fund notified in the
Official Gazette by
the Central Government or the State
Government in this behalf, and political pensions;
(h) the wages of labourers and domestic servants, whether
payable in money or in kind;
(i) salary to the extent of the first one thousand rupees and
two-thirds of the remainder in execution of any decree other
than a decree for maintenance:
Provided that where any part of such portion of the salary as is
liable to attachment has been under attachment, whether
continuously or intermittently, for a total period of twenty-four
months, such portion shall be exempt from attachment until the
expiry of a further period of twelve months, and, where such
attachment has been made in execution of one and the same
decree, shall, after the attachment has continued for a total
period of twenty-four months, be finally exempt from
attachment in execution of that decree;
(ia) one-third of the salary in execution of any decree for
maintenance;
(j) the pay and allowances of persons to whom the Air Force
Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or
the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957), applies;
(k) all compulsory deposits and other sums in or derived from
any fund to which the Provident Funds Act, 1925 (19 of 1925),
for the time being applies in so far as they are declared by the
said Act not to be liable to attachment;
(ka) all deposits and other sums in or derived from any fund to
which the Public Provident Fund Act, 1968 (23 of 1968), for the
time being applies, in so far as they are declared by the said
Act as not to be liable to attachment;
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 13 of 84
(kb) all moneys payable under a policy of insurance on the life
of the judgment-debtor;
(kc) the interest of a lessee of a residential building to which
the provisions of law for the time being in force relating to
control of rents and accommodation apply;
l) any allowance forming part of the emoluments of any servant
of the Government] or of any servant of a railway company or
local authority which the appropriate Government may by
notification in the Official Gazette declare to be exempt from
attachment, and any subsistence grant or allowance made
to any such servant while under suspension;
(m) an expectancy of succession by survivorship or other
merely contingent or possible right or interest;
(n) a right to future maintenance;
(o) any allowance declared by any Indian law to be exempt
from liability to attachment or sale in execution of a decree;
and
(p) where the judgment-debtor is a person liable for the
payment of land-revenue, any movable property which, under
any law for the time being applicable to him, is exempt from
sale for the recovery of an arrear of such revenue.
Explanation I.—The moneys payable in relation to the matters
mentioned in clauses (g), (h), (i), (ia), (j), (l) and (o) are exempt
from attachment or sale, whether before or after they are
actually payable, and, in the case of salary, the attachable
portion thereof is liable to attachment, whether before or after
it is actually payable.
Explanation II.—In clauses (i) and (ia), ―salary‖ means the
total monthly emoluments, excluding any allowance declared
exempt from attachment under the provisions of clause (l),
derived by a person from his employment whether on duty or on
leave.
Explanation III.—In clause (I) ―appropriate Government‖
means—
(i) as respects any person in the service of the Central
Government, or any servant of a Railway Administration
or of a cantonment authority or of the port authority of a
major port, the Central Government;
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 14 of 84
(ii) [* * *]
(iii) as respects any other servant of the Government or a
servant of any other local authority, the State
Government.
Explanation IV.—For the purposes of this proviso, ―wages‖
includes bonus, and ―labourer‖ includes a skilled, unskilled or
semi-skilled labourer.
Explanation V.—For the purposes of this proviso, the
expression ―agriculturist‖ means a person who cultivates land
personally and who depends for his livelihood mainly on the
income from agricultural land, whether as owner, tenant,
partner or agricultural labourer.
Explanation VI.—For the purposes of Explanation V, an
agriculturist shall be deemed to cultivate land personally, if he
cultivates land—
(a) by his own labour, or
(b) by the labour of any member of his family, or
(c) by servants or labourers on wages payable in cash or
in kind (not being as a share of the produce), or both.
(1-A) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for
the time being in force, an agreement by which a person agrees
to waive the benefit of any exemption under this section shall be
void.
(2) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to exempt houses
and other buildings (with the materials and the sites thereof
and the lands immediately appurtenant thereto and necessary
for their enjoyment) from attachment or sale in execution of
decrees for rent of any such house, building, site or land.‖
24. Section 30 of the Code of Civil Procedure - Power to order discovery
Section 30 of Code of Civil Procedure empowers the Court, either on its
own or on the application of any party, to make such orders as may be for
necessary for the admission of documents and facts, discovery, inspection,
production, impounding and return of documents or other material objects
producible as evidence; and any fact to be proved by affidavit. Section 30 of
the Code of Civil Procedure reads as under:
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 15 of 84
“Section 30 - Power to order discovery and the like
Subject to such conditions and limitations as may be
prescribed, the Court may, at any time, either of its own motion
or on the application of any party,—
(a) make such orders as may be necessary or reasonable in all
matters relating to the delivery and answering of
interrogatories, the admission of documents and facts, and the
discovery, inspection, production, impounding and return of
documents or other material objects producible as evidence;
(b) issue summonses to persons whose attendance is required
either to give evidence or to produce documents or such other
objects as aforesaid;
(c) order any fact to be proved by affidavit.‖
25. Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act - Burden of disclosing the
assets
The assets and income of a judgment-debtor are within his personal
knowledge and Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act casts the burden on
him to disclose his assets and income. Section 106 of the Indian Evidence
Act reads as under:
―Section 106 - Burden of proving fact especially within
knowledge –
When any fact is especially within the knowledge of any
person, the burden of proving that fact is upon him.‖
26. Section 165 of the Indian Evidence Act - Judge’s Power to put
questions and order production
It is the duty of the Court to ascertain the truth and then, do justice on the
basis of the truth. Section 165 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 invests the
Judge with plenary powers to put any question to any witness or party; in
any form, at any time, about any fact relevant or irrelevant. Section 165 is
intended to arm the Judge with the most extensive power possible for the
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 16 of 84
purpose of finding the truth. The effect of this Section is that in order to get
to the bottom of the matter before it, the Court will be able to look at and
inquire into every fact and thus, possibly acquire valuable indicative
evidence which may lead to other evidence strictly relevant and admissible.
The Court is not, however, permitted to base its judgment on any, but only
on relevant statements. Section 165 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 reads
as under:
“Section 165 - Judge’s power to put questions or order
production
The Judge may, in order to discover or to obtain proper proof
of relevant facts, ask any question he pleases, in any form, at
any time, of any witness, or of the parties, about any fact
relevant or irrelevant; and may order the production of any
document or thing; and neither the parties nor their agents
shall be entitled to make any objection to any such question or
order, nor, without the leave of the Court, to cross-examine any
witness upon any answer given in reply to any such question:
Provided that the judgment must be based upon facts
declared by this Act to be relevant, and duly proved:
Provided also that this section shall not authorize any
Judge to compel any witness to answer any question or to
produce any document which such witness would be entitled to
refuse to answer or produce under Sections 121 to 131, both
inclusive, if the question were asked or the document were
called for by the adverse party; nor shall the Judge ask any
question which it would be improper for any other person to ask
under section 148 or 149 ; nor shall he dispense with primary
evidence of any document, except in the cases herein before
excepted.‖
27. In Ved Parkash Kharbanda v. Vimal Bindal, (2013) 198 DLT 555,
this Court discussed the meaning of „Truth‘ and how to discover it. This
Court considered Ram Chander v. State of Haryana, (1981) 3 SCC 191,
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 17 of 84
Ritesh Tewari v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2010) 10 SCC 677, Zahira H.
Sheikh v. State of Gujarat, (2004) 4 SCC 158, State of Rajasthan v. Ani,
(1997) 6 SCC 162, Mohanlal Shamji Soni v. Union of India, 1991 Supp.
(1) SCC 271, Jamatraj Kewalji Govani v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1968
SC 178, Sessions Judge, Nellore Referring Officer v. Intha Ramana
Reddy, 1972 CriLJ 1485 with respect to the scope of the power under
Section 165 of the Indian Evidence Act.
28. Delhi High Court Rules for Execution of Decrees
The Delhi High Court Rules for execution of decrees [Volume I of High
Court Rules and Orders, Part C, Chapter 12 – Part A – ‗General‘] provides
for expeditious disposal of the execution cases by District Courts. Rule 2
provides at least one day every week to be reserved for execution work to
ensure expeditious disposal. Rules 4 and 5 provide for close supervision and
control of the execution cases by the District Judge and report to the High
Court in the event of any delay in the disposal of execution cases. Rules 2, 4
and 5 of Volume I of High Court Rules and Orders, Part C, Chapter 12, Part
A - General of Delhi High Court Rules are reproduced hereunder:
―CHAPTER 12
Execution of Decrees
Part A - GENERAL
2. Special Day To Be Reserved For Execution Work
Execution of decrees should receive the same attention
from the Courts as original civil work and should be
methodically and regularly dealt with, as expeditiously as
possible. Where parties have to be heard or evidence recorded
in the course of execution proceedings, notice should be given,
processes issued and dates fixed as in the case of original suits.
As a rule one day during the week should be reserved for
execution works so as to ensure proper attention being paid to
it; some times two days are necessary. District Judges are
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 18 of 84
responsible for seeing that proper arrangements are made for
execution work by all courts subordinate to them.
xxx xxx xxx
4. Distribution Of Execution Work By District Judge
District Judges should record standing orders regulating
the distribution of applications for the execution of decrees
among the Courts subordinate to them, providing for the
disposal of cases in which decrees were passed by officers who
have ceased to be attached to the district, and for carrying on
the execution proceedings already pending before such officers
at the time of their ceasing to be employed therein. In framing
such orders, every Court should be required as far as possible,
to execute all decrees passed by itself; but, where this is not
possible and it is necessary to send the decree to another Court
for execution, care should be taken to see that it is a Court of
competent jurisdiction [Section 39(2)]. Court shall demand to
be a Court of Competent jurisdiction, if at the time of making
the application for the transfer of decree to it, such Court
would have jurisdiction to try the suit in which such decree was
passed [Section 39(3) added by Amending Act, 1976].
5. District Judge To See That Execution Work Is not Neglected
In Lower Courts
Close supervision and control should be exercised by
District Judges over the execution of degree business pending
in all Courts subordinate to them; and where any officer is
found habitually to neglect this branch of work or to dispose of
it in a perfunctory manner, he should be reported to the High
Court.‖
Truth should be the Guiding Star in the Entire Judicial Process
29. It is the duty of the Court to ascertain the true assets and income of the
judgment-debtor. Truth is the foundation of justice. Dispensation of justice,
based on truth, is an essential feature in the justice delivery system. People
would have faith in Courts when truth alone triumphs. The justice based on
truth would establish peace in the society.
30. Krishna Iyer, J. in Jasraj Inder Singh v. Hemraj Multanchand,
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 19 of 84
(1977) 2 SCC 155 described truth and justice as under:
―8. …Truth, like song, is whole, and half-truth can be noise!
Justice is truth, is beauty and the strategy of healing injustice is
discovery of the whole truth and harmonising human relations.
Law's finest hour is not in meditating on abstractions but in
being the delivery agent of full fairness. This divagation is
justified by the need to remind ourselves that the grammar of
justice according to law is not little litigative solution of
isolated problems but resolving the conflict in its wider
bearings.‖
(Emphasis Supplied)
31. In Union Carbide Corporation v. Union of India, (1989) 3 SCC 38,
the Supreme Court described justice and truth to mean the same. The
observations of the Supreme Court are as under:
―30. …when one speaks of justice and truth, these words mean
the same thing to all men whose judgment is uncommitted. Of
Truth and Justice, Anatole France said:
―Truth passes within herself a penetrating force
unknown alike to error and falsehood. I say truth
and you must understand my meaning. For the
beautiful words Truth and Justice need not be
defined in order to be understood in their true
sense. They bear within them a shining beauty and
a heavenly light. I firmly believe in the triumph of
truth and justice. That is what upholds me in times
of trial....‖
(Emphasis Supplied)
32. In Mohanlal Shamji Soni v. Union of India, 1991 Supp (1) SCC 271,
the Supreme Court observed that the presiding officer of a Court should not
simply sit as a mere umpire at a contest between two parties and declare at
the end of the combat who has won and who has lost. The presiding officer
has a legal duty of his own, independent of the parties, to take an active role
in the proceedings in finding the truth and administering justice.
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 20 of 84
33. In Chandra Shashi v. Anil Kumar Verma, (1995) 1 SCC 421, the
Supreme Court observed that to enable the Courts to ward off unjustified
interference in their working, those who indulge in immoral acts like
perjury, pre-variation and motivated falsehoods have to be appropriately
dealt with, without which it would not be possible for any Court to
administer justice in the true sense and to the satisfaction of those who
approach it with the hope that truth would ultimately prevail. People would
have faith in Courts when they would find that truth alone triumphs in
Courts.
34. In Zahira Habibullah Sheikh v. State of Gujarat, (2006) 3 SCC 374,
the Supreme Court observed that right from the inception of the judicial
system it has been accepted that discovery, vindication and establishment of
truth are the main purposes underlying existence of Courts of justice.
35. In Himanshu Singh Sabharwal v. State of Madhya Pradesh, (2008)
3 SCC 602, the Supreme Court held that the trial should be a search for the
truth and not about over technicalities. The Supreme Court‟s observations
are as under:
―5. …………… 31. In 1846, in a judgment which Lord
Chancellor Selborne would later describe as ‗one of the ablest
judgments of one of the ablest judges who ever sat in this
Court‘, Vice-Chancellor Knight Bruce said [Pearse v. Pearse,
(1846) 1 De G&Sm. 12 : 16 LJ Ch 153 : 63 ER 950 : 18 Digest
(Repl.) 91, 748] : (De G&Sm. pp. 28-29):
―31. The discovery and vindication and
establishment of truth are main purposes certainly
of the existence of courts of justice; still, for the
obtaining of these objects, which, however
valuable and important, cannot be usefully
pursued without moderation, cannot be either
usefully or creditably pursued unfairly or gained
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 21 of 84
by unfair means, not every channel is or ought to
be open to them. The practical inefficacy of torture
is not, I suppose, the most weighty objection to that
mode of examination,... Truth, like all other good
things, may be loved unwisely—may be pursued
too keenly—may cost too much.
xxx xxx xxx
35. Courts have always been considered to have an overriding
duty to maintain public confidence in the administration of
justice—often referred to as the duty to vindicate and uphold
the ‗majesty of the law‘.‖
(Emphasis Supplied)
36. In Maria Margarida Sequeria Fernandes v. Erasmo Jack de
Sequeria, (2012) 5 SCC 370, the Supreme Court again highlighted the
significance of truth and observed that the truth should be the guiding star in
the entire legal process and it is the duty of the Judge to discover the truth to
do complete justice. The Supreme Court further stressed that the Judge has
to play an active role to discover the truth and he should explore all avenues
open to him in order to discover the truth. The Supreme Court observed as
under:
―32. In this unfortunate litigation, the Court's serious
endeavour has to be to find out where in fact the truth
lies.
33. The truth should be the guiding star in the entire
judicial process. Truth alone has to be the foundation of
justice. The entire judicial system has been created only
to discern and find out the real truth. Judges at all levels
have to seriously engage themselves in the journey of
discovering the truth. That is their mandate, obligation
and bounden duty. Justice system will acquire credibility
only when people will be convinced that justice is based
on the foundation of the truth.
xxx xxx xxx
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 22 of 84
35. What people expect is that the Court should
discharge its obligation to find out where in fact the truth
lies. Right from inception of the judicial system it has
been accepted that discovery, vindication and
establishment of truth are the main purposes underlying
the existence of the courts of justice.
xxx xxx xxx
52. Truth is the foundation of justice. It must be the
endeavour of all the judicial officers and judges to
ascertain truth in every matter and no stone should be
left unturned in achieving this object. Courts must give
greater emphasis on the veracity of pleadings and
documents in order to ascertain the truth.‖
(Emphasis Supplied)
False Claims and Defences
37. The greatest challenge before the judiciary today is the frivolous
litigation. The judicial system in the country is choked with false claims and
such litigants are consuming Courts‟ time for a wrong cause. False claims
are a huge strain on the judicial system. False pleas are often taken and
forged documents are filed indiscriminately in the Courts. The reluctance of
the Courts to order prosecution encourages the litigants to raise false claims
before the Court.
38. In Maria Margarida Sequeria Fernandes v. Erasmo Jack de
Sequeria, (2012) 5 SCC 370, the Supreme Court observed that false claims
and defences are serious problems. The Supreme Court held as under: -
“False claims and false defences
81. False claims and defences are really serious problems with
real estate litigation, predominantly because of ever escalating
prices of the real estate. Litigation pertaining to valuable real
estate properties is dragged on by unscrupulous litigants in the
hope that the other party will tire out and ultimately would
settle with them by paying a huge amount. This happens
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 23 of 84
because of the enormous delay in adjudication of cases in our
Courts. If pragmatic approach is adopted, then this problem
can be minimized to a large extent.
39. In Subrata Roy Sahara v. Union of India, (2014) 8 SCC 470, the
Supreme Court observed that the Indian judicial system is grossly afflicted
with frivolous litigation. Relevant portion of the said judgment is as under:
―191. The Indian judicial system is grossly afflicted, with
frivolous litigation. Ways and means need to be evolved,
to deter litigants from their compulsive obsession,
towards senseless and ill-considered claims.‖
(Emphasis Supplied)
Consequences of Making a False Claim in Court
40. Section 209 of the Indian Penal Code provides an effective
mechanism to curb the menace of frivolous litigation. Section 209 of the
Indian Penal Code provides that dishonestly making a false claim in a Court
is an offence punishable with punishment of imprisonment upto two years
and fine. Section 209 of the Indian Penal Code is reproduced hereunder:
―Section 209 - Dishonestly making false claim in Court —
Whoever fraudulently or dishonestly, or with intent to injure or
annoy any person, makes in a Court of Justice any claim which
he knows to be false, shall be punished with imprisonment of
either description for a term which may extend to two years,
and shall also be liable to fine.‖
41. Section 209 of the Indian Penal Code, is a salutary provision enacted
to preserve the sanctity of the Courts and to safeguard the administration of
law by deterring the litigants from making the false claims. However, this
provision has been seldom invoked by the Courts. The disastrous result of
not invoking Section 209 is that the litigants indulge in false claims because
of the confidence that no action will be taken.
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 24 of 84
42. The judicial system has to protect itself from such wrongdoing by
taking cognizance, directing prosecution, and punishing those found guilty.
In H.S. Bedi v. National Highway Authority of India, 2016 (227) DLT 129,
this Court examined the scope of Section 209 of the Indian Penal Code.
Restitution
43. One major incentive for the obstruction and delay of execution
proceedings by the judgment-debtors is the ability to benefit by either tiring
out the decree-holders into giving up or coercing them to settle for less. This
occurs because of the reluctance of the Executing Court to wield their power
to order restitution.
44. Unless Courts disgorge all benefits that a party availed by obstruction
or delays or non-compliance, there will always be incentive for non-
compliance, and parties are ingenious enough to come up with all kinds of
pleas and other tactics to achieve their end.
45. Whatever benefits a person has had or could have had by not
complying with the judgment must be disgorged and paid to the decree-
holder. This is the bounden duty and obligation of the Court.
46. In Ramrameshwari Devi v. Nirmala Devi, (2011) 8 SCC 249, the
Supreme Court recognised the inherent power of the Court to order
restitution to do real and substantive justice. Para 52 (G) of the judgment is
reproduced hereunder:
―52. (G) The principle of restitution be fully applied in a
pragmatic manner in order to do real and substantial justice.‖
(Emphasis Supplied)
47. In Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India, (2011)
8 SCC 161, the Supreme Court again recognised the inherent power of the
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 25 of 84
Court to order restitution. The Supreme Court held as under:
―148. The appellants must pay the amount is one thing but
should they pay only that amount or something more? If the
period were a few days or months it would have been different
but here it is almost 14 years that have lapsed and the amount
has not been paid. The questions, therefore, are really three:
1. Can a party who does not comply with the court
order be permitted to retain the benefits of his own
wrong of non-compliance?
2. Whether the successful party be not
compensated by way of restitution for deprivation
of its legitimate dues for more than fourteen years?
and
3. Whether the Court should not remove all
incentives for not complying with the judgment of
the Court?
149. It is settled principle of law that no one can take
advantage of his own wrong. Unless courts disgorge all
benefits that a party availed by obstruction or delays or non-
compliance, there will always be incentive for non-compliance,
and parties are ingenious enough to come up with all kinds of
pleas and other tactics to achieve their end because they know
that in the end the benefit will remain with them.
150. Whatever benefits a person has had or could have had by
not complying with the judgment must be disgorged and paid to
the judgment-creditor and not allowed to be retained by the
judgment-debtor. This is the bounden duty and obligation of the
court. In fact, it has to be looked at from the position of the
creditor. Unless the deprivation by reason of delay is fully
restituted, the creditor as a beneficiary remains a loser to the
extent of the unrestituted amount.‖
(Emphasis Supplied)
48. In A. Shanmugam v. Ariya Kshatriya Rajakula Vamsathu Madalaya
Nandhavana Paripalanai Sangam, (2012) 6 SCC 430, the Supreme Court
again reiterated the principles relating to restitution. Relevant paras of the
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 26 of 84
judgment are reproduced hereunder:
Restitution and Mesne Profits
34. Experience reveals that a large number of cases are filed on
false claims or evasive pleas are introduced by the defendant to
cause delay in the administration of justice and this can be
sufficiently taken care of if the courts adopt realistic approach
granting restitution.
xxx xxx xxx
38. False averments of facts and untenable contentions are
serious problems faced by our courts. The other problem is that
litigants deliberately create confusion by introducing irrelevant
and minimally relevant facts and documents. The court cannot
reject such claims, defences and pleas at the first look. It may
take quite some time, at times years, before the court is able to
see through, discern and reach to the truth. More often than
not, they appear attractive at first blush and only on a deeper
examination the irrelevance and hollowness of those pleadings
and documents come to light.
39. Our courts are usually short of time because of huge
pendency of cases and at times the courts arrive at an
erroneous conclusion because of false pleas, claims, defences
and irrelevant facts. A litigant could deviate from the facts
which are liable for all the conclusions. In the journey of
discovering the truth, at times, this Court, at a later stage, but
once discovered, it is the duty of the court to take appropriate
remedial and preventive steps so that no one should derive
benefits or advantages by abusing the process of law. The court
must effectively discourage fraudulent and dishonest litigants.
43. On the facts of the present case, the following principles
emerge:
43.1. It is the bounden duty of the court to uphold the truth and
do justice.
43.2. Every litigant is expected to state truth before the law
court whether it is pleadings, affidavits or evidence. Dishonest
and unscrupulous litigants have no place in law courts.
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 27 of 84
43.3. The ultimate object of the judicial proceedings is to
discern the truth and do justice. It is imperative that pleadings
and all other presentations before the court should be truthful.
43.4. Once the court discovers falsehood, concealment,
distortion, obstruction or confusion in pleadings and
documents, the court should in addition to full restitution
impose appropriate costs. The court must ensure that there is
no incentive for wrongdoer in the temple of justice. Truth is the
foundation of justice and it has to be the common endeavour of
all to uphold the truth and no one should be permitted to
pollute the stream of justice.
43.5. It is the bounden obligation of the court to neutralise any
unjust and/or undeserved benefit or advantage obtained by
abusing the judicial process.
(Emphasis Supplied)
Imposition of Costs
49. Imposition of actual and realistic costs in appropriate cases would go
a long way in controlling the tendency of filing false cases.
50. In Ramrameshwari Devi v. Nirmala Devi, (2011) 8 SCC 249, the
Supreme Court held that the Courts have to take pragmatic realities into
consideration and have to be realistic in imposing the costs. The relevant
paragraphs of the said judgment are reproduced hereunder:-
―52...................C. Imposition of actual, realistic or
proper costs and/or ordering prosecution would go a
long way in controlling the tendency of introducing false
pleadings and forged and fabricated documents by the
litigants. Imposition of heavy costs would also control
unnecessary adjournments by the parties. In appropriate
cases the courts may consider ordering prosecution
otherwise it may not be possible to maintain purity and
sanctity of judicial proceedings.
xxx xxx xxx
54. While imposing costs we have to take into
consideration pragmatic realities and be realistic as to
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 28 of 84
what the defendants or the respondents had to actually
incur in contesting the litigation before different courts.
We have to also broadly take into consideration the
prevalent fee structure of the lawyers and other
miscellaneous expenses which have to be incurred
towards drafting and filing of the counter affidavit,
miscellaneous charges towards typing, photocopying,
court fee etc.
(Emphasis Supplied)
51. In Maria Margarida Sequeria Fernandes v. Erasmo Jack de
Sequeria, (2012) 5 SCC 370, the Supreme Court held that heavy costs and
prosecution should be ordered in cases of false claims and defences. The
relevant paragraph of the said judgment is reproduced hereunder:-
―82. This Court in a recent judgment in Ramrameshwari
Devi (supra) aptly observed at p. 266 para 43 that unless
wrongdoers are denied profit from frivolous litigation, it would
be difficult to prevent it. In order to curb uncalled for and
frivolous litigation, the courts have to ensure that there is no
incentive or motive for uncalled for litigation. It is a matter of
common experience that court's otherwise scarce time is
consumed or more appropriately, wasted in a large number of
uncalled for cases. In this very judgment, the Court provided
that this problem can be solved or at least be minimised if
exemplary cost is imposed for instituting frivolous litigation.
The Court observed at pp. 267-268, para 58 that imposition of
actual, realistic or proper costs and/or ordering prosecution in
appropriate cases would go a long way in controlling the
tendency of introducing false pleadings and forged and
fabricated documents by the litigants. Imposition of heavy costs
would also control unnecessary adjournments by the parties. In
appropriate cases, the courts may consider ordering
prosecution otherwise it may not be possible to maintain purity
and sanctity of judicial proceedings.‖
(Emphasis Supplied)
52. In Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India, (2011)
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 29 of 84
8 SCC 161, the Supreme Court again held that the Court must adopt a
pragmatic approach and in appropriate cases, realistic costs and
compensation be ordered in order to discourage dishonest litigation. The
relevant paragraphs of this judgment are reproduced hereunder:-
―191. In consonance with the principle of equity, justice and
good conscience Judges should ensure that the legal process is
not abused by the litigants in any manner. The court should
never permit a litigant to perpetuate illegality by abusing the
legal process. It is the bounden duty of the court to ensure that
dishonesty and any attempt to abuse the legal process must be
effectively curbed and the court must ensure that there is no
wrongful, unauthorised or unjust gain for anyone by the abuse
of the process of the court. One way to curb this tendency is to
impose realistic costs, which the respondent or the defendant
has in fact incurred in order to defend himself in the legal
proceedings. The courts would be fully justified even imposing
punitive costs where legal process has been abused. No one
should be permitted to use the judicial process for earning
undeserved gains or unjust profits. The court must effectively
discourage fraudulent, unscrupulous and dishonest litigation.
192. The court's constant endeavour must be to ensure that
everyone gets just and fair treatment. The court while rendering
justice must adopt a pragmatic approach and in appropriate
cases realistic costs and compensation be ordered in order to
discourage dishonest litigation. The object and true meaning of
the concept of restitution cannot be achieved or accomplished
unless the courts adopt a pragmatic approach in dealing with
the cases.‖
(Emphasis Supplied)
International Best Practices
53. This Court has examined the formats of the affidavits of assets,
income, expenditure and liabilities to be filed by the judgment-debtor in
execution cases in United Kingdom, United States of America, Canada,
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 30 of 84
Ireland, Australia, Singapore, New Zealand and South Africa. However, this
Court has incorporated only important questions and documents to keep the
format concise and precise. The Courts below are at liberty to consider the
following formats used in various countries and to direct the judgment-
debtor to disclose further relevant facts and documents as may be considered
necessary to determine the assets, income, expenditure and liabilities of the
judgment-debtor. The relevant particulars of the formats in the other Courts
along with the applicable statues are as under:-
S. No
Country
Place/
Authority
Statue/
Applicable Rules
Form/Annexure
/Appendix/ Affidavit
Hyper Link
1.
Australia Supreme Court &
Magistrates Court
Court Procedures Rules,
2006
Form 2.52-Statement of
enforcement debtor's
financial position
1. https://www.legislation.act.g
ov.au/View/af/2006-
297/current/PDF/2006-
297.PDF
2. Australia Magistrates Court
of Western
Australia
Civil Judgments
Enforcement Regulations,
2005
Part 4 - Enforcement of
monetary
Judgments
Division 2 - Means inquiry
Regulation 17
Statement of financial
affairs
Form 38 - Statement of
financial affairs
Form 38A - Statement of
Financial Affairs
Corporation
Form 38B - Affidavit of
Financial Affairs
1. https://www.magistratescour
t.wa.gov.au/_files/CJE_For
m_38.pdf
2. https://www.magistratescour
t.wa.gov.au/_files/CJE_For
m_38A.pdf
3. https://www.magistratescour
t.wa.gov.au/_files/CJE_For
m_38B.pdf
3. Australia Magistrates‟ Court
of Victoria
Magistrates' Court General
Civil Procedure Rules,
2010
Rules 72.02(4),
72.04(3), 72.05(5)(a)
Rule 67.01(3)(8)
Judgment Debtor‟s
Statement of Financial
Position – Individual -
Form 72C
Judgment Debtor‟s
Statement of Financial
Position – Corporation -
Form 67C
1. https://www.mcv.vic.gov.au/
sites/default/files/2018-
10/Judgment-debtors-
statement-of-financial-
position-Form-72C.pdf
2. https://www.mcv.vic.gov.au/
sites/default/files/2018-
10/Examination-of-
judgment-debtor-
corporation-Form-67C.pdf
4. Australia Supreme Court of
Queensland
Uniform Civil Procedure
Rules 1999, Rule 807 Statement of Financial
Position
Form 71, Version 3
1. https://www.courts.qld.gov.a
u/__data/assets/word_doc/00
05/88421/form-071-
statement-of-financial-
position.doc
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 31 of 84
5. Australia New South Wales
Civil Procedure Act, 2005
Uniform Civil Procedure
Rules, 2005
Part 38 - Examination of
judgment debtor etc.
Rule 38.1
Form - 51 Examination
Notice - Individual
Form – 52 Examination
Notice - Corporation
1. http://www.ucprforms.justice.
nsw.gov.au/Documents/PDF/u
cpr_form_51_v3.pdf
2. http://www.ucprforms.justic
e.nsw.gov.au/Documents/PD
F/ucpr_form_53_v3.pdf
6. Ireland The Courts
Services of Ireland
District Court (Civil
Procedure) Rules, 2014
Enforcement of Court
Orders Act 1926, Part – II,
Section 15(1) -
Examination of Debtors
Order 51A, Rule 4 -
Schedule: C - Forms in
civil proceedings
Form: 51A.02 Statement
of means
1. http://www.courts.ie/rules.ns
f/53bd32841fc5bbf280256d
2b0045bb5d/8bce12e357295
52e80257c91005a71fa?Ope
nDocument
7. New
Zealand
New Zealand
Ministry of Justice
District Court Act, 2016
Part 10 - Enforcement of
judgments – Sections 145
– 153
District Court Rules, 2014
[Repealed]
Part 19 - Enforcement –
Rule 19.15 - 19.19
Financial Statement of
judgment debtor
Individual - Form 36
MOJ36/05/14,
MOJ208/10/19
Organization - Form 36a
MOJ36a/02/14,
MOJ208/10/19
1. https://www.justice.govt.nz/
assets/Documents/Forms/20
8w-filing-a-statement-of-
judgment-debtor.pdf
2. https://www.justice.govt.nz/
assets/Documents/Forms/Fin
ancial-statement-individual-
form36.pdf
3. https://www.justice.govt.nz/
assets/Documents/Forms/20
9-filing-a-statement-of-
judgment-debtor-
organisation.pdf
4. https://www.justice.govt.nz/
assets/Documents/Forms/Fin
ancial-statement-company-
36a.pdf
8. Singapore Supreme Court of
Singapore
Supreme Court Practice
Directions, 2013 [Last
updated on 04th December,
2019]
Part X: Enforcement of
Judgments and Orders
Rule 80A. Examination of
Judgment Debtor
Forms 11A -
Examination of Judgment
Debtor - Individual
Forms 11B -
Examination of Judgment
Debtor - Company
1. https://epd.supremecourt.go
v.sg/downloads/Appendix_
A/Form_11A.pdf
2. https://epd.supremecourt.go
v.sg/downloads/Appendix_
A/Form_11B.pdf
9. Singapore The State Courts of
Singapore, Civil
Justice Division
Examination of Judgment
debtor - Toolkit
Forms 44 - Examination
of Judgment Debtor -
Individual
Forms 45 - Examination
of Judgment Debtor -
Company
1. https://www.statecourts.gov.
sg/cws/CivilCase/Document
s/Civil_Toolkit_EJD_17022
014.pdf
2. https://www.statecourts.gov.
sg/cws/CivilCase/Document
s/PD07032014-AppB-
Form44-
EJDQuestionairre.doc
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 32 of 84
3. https://www.statecourts.gov.
sg/cws/CivilCase/Document
s/PD07032014-AppB-
Form45-
EJDQuestionairre.doc
10. U.K. Her Majesty's
Courts and
Tribunals Service
(HMCTS)
County Courts‟
Civil Procedure Rules,
1998
PART 71 - Orders to
Obtain Information from
Judgment Debtors
Practice Direction Part 71
– Orders to Obtain
Information from
Judgment Debtors
Rule 71.6 of Orders to
Obtain Information from
Judgment Debtors Para
(4.1) of Practice Direction
Part 71 – Orders to Obtain
Information From
Appendix A - Form
EX140: Record of
evidence (individual
debtor)
Appendix B - Form
EX141 : Record of
evidence (Officer of a
company
Form N316: Apply for an
order for a debtor to
attend court
Form N316A:
Application for order that
officer of the debtor
company attend court for
questioning
1. https://assets.publishing.serv
ice.gov.uk/government/uplo
ads/system/uploads/attachm
ent_data/file/688117/ex140-
eng.pdf
2. https://assets.publishing.serv
ice.gov.uk/government/uplo
ads/system/uploads/attachm
ent_data/file/688119/ex141-
eng.pdf
3. https://assets.publishing.serv
ice.gov.uk/government/uplo
ads/system/uploads/attachm
ent_data/file/688613/n316-
eng.pdf
4. https://assets.publishing.serv
ice.gov.uk/government/uplo
ads/system/uploads/attachm
ent_data/file/688616/n316a-
eng.pdf
11. Canada Court of Queen‟s
Bench of Alberta
Civil Enforcement Act
Civil Enforcement
Regulation
Alberta Regulation
276/1995 With
amendments up to and
including Alberta
Regulation 221/2017
Form 13 - Financial
Statement of Debtor
(Individual Debtor)
Form 14 - Financial
Statement of Debtor
(Corporate Debtor)
1. https://albertacourts.ca/docs/
default-
source/qb/form14.doc?sfvrs
n=2a82ad80_0
2. https://albertacourts.ca/docs/
default-
source/qb/form14.doc?sfvrs
n=2a82ad80_0
12. Canada Ontario Ontario Regulation
258/98: Rules of the Small
Claims Court under Courts
of Justice Act, R.S.O.
1990, c. C.43
Form 20I
Ontario Regulation
258/98
1. http://www.ontariocourtform
s.on.ca/forms/scc/20i/SCR-
20I-Jan14-fil-EN.doc
13. Republic
of South
Africa
Department of
Justice and
Constitutional
Development
Magistrates' Courts Act 32
of 1944 - Section 65I(2) &
74A
Form No. 45 Statement
of Affairs of Debtor
1. https://www.justice.gov.za/f
orms/MCR/J927-form45.pdf
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 33 of 84
14. Republic
of South
Africa
Johannesburg
Central
Magistrate‟s Court
Civil Section
The National Credit Act
34 OF 2005
Section 86(7)(c)
Form B - Statement of
Affairs of Debtor
1. https://www.justice.gov.za/
mc/mcjhb/form-B.pdf
15. U.S.A. Minnesota Judicial
Branch, 4th
Judicial
District
Minnesota Statutes Civil
Procedure
Minnesota
Statutes 2012, sections
491A.02, subdivision
9; 550.011
Financial Disclosure
Form
1. http://www.mncourts.gov/m
ncourtsgov/media/CourtFor
ms/JGM301.doc?ext=.doc
16. U.S.A. District Court of
County, Kansas
The 16th
Judicial District,
Small Claims
Financial Statement of
Debtor
1. http://www.kscourts.org/dstc
ts/16scjdsa.pdf
17. U.S.A. Administrative
Office of the U.S.
Courts
Form No. CJA 23
Financial Affidavit
1. https://www.uscourts.gov/sit
es/default/files/cja23.pdf
18. U.S.A. Judicial Council of
California
Code of Civil Procedure,
Part 1. of Courts of
Justice, Title 1.
Organization &
Jurisdiction, Chapter 5.5.
Small Claims Court,
Article 8. Satisfaction and
Enforcement of Judgment.
Sections 116.620(a),
116.830
Judgment Debtor
Statement of Assets
1. https://www.courts.ca.gov/d
ocuments/sc133.pdf
19. U.S.A. Michigan Courts Michigan Compiled Laws
MCL 600.6001 et seq.,
MCR 600.8410 in small
claims cases only, and
MCR 2.621.
Revised Judicature Act of
1961
Financial Statement 1. https://courts.michigan.gov/
Administration/SCAO/Form
s/courtforms/mc287.pdf
20. U.S.A. United States
District Court,
District of
Connecticut
General Statutes of
Connecticut
Volume- 13, Title 52-Civil
Actions, Chapters 906-
Post Judgments Procedure,
Section 52-397
Financial Affidavit 1. https://www.jud.ct.gov/webf
orms/forms/fm006-long.pdf
21. U.S.A. Commonwealth of
Massachusetts
Massachusetts Trial Court
Rules
Trial Court Rule III:
Uniform Small Claims
Rules
Uniform Small Claims
Rule 9: Enforcement of
Judgments
Sub Rule (c)
Financial Statement of
Judgment Debtor
1. https://www.mass.gov/files/
documents/2018/12/31/jud-
financial-statement-of-
judgment-debtor.pdf
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 34 of 84
22. U.S.A. The Delaware
Municipal Court,
Delaware County,
Ohio
Ohio Revised Code, 1953
Title XIX Courts -
Municipal - Mayor's -
County - Chapter 1925:
Small Claims Divisions -
Collecting & enforcing
judgments - 1925.13 (B)
Motion for Debtor Exam
or Financial Disclosure
(Proceeding in Aid of
Execution - Small-
Claims Court) RC
Section 1925.13
1. http://www.municipalcourt.o
rg/wp-
content/uploads/Debtor-
Exam-or-Financial-
Disclosure-Application-
for.pdf
23. U.S.A Wisconsin Statutes (Small Claims) Sections
799.26, 812.34 & 812.39,
Wisconsin Statutes
C-506B, 11/17 Financial
Disclosure Statement
1. https://www.wicourts.gov/fo
rmdisplay/SC-
506B.pdf?formNumber=SC-
506B&formType=Form&for
matId=2&language=en
24. U.S.A Florida Florida Rules of Civil
Procedure, Discovery I
Aid of Execution - Rule
1.560 (b),(c)
Florida Rule of Civil
Procedure Form 1.977
(Fact Information Sheet)
1. https://www.15thcircuit.com
/sites/default/files/divisions/
county-civil/rb/Civil-
Procedure-Rules-Updated-8-
4-2017.pdf
25. U.S.A New Jersey Courts
Superior Court of
New Jersey
Rules Governing the
Courts of the State of New
Jersey
Process to Enforce
Judgments - Orders for
Discovery; Information
Subpoenas - Rule 6:7-2 (b)
Civil Action Information
Subpoena
Appendix XI-L
1. https://njcourts.gov/forms/
11840_infor_sub_written_
quest.pdf
Conclusion
54. The execution of decrees/awards deserve special attention considering
that inordinate delay in execution proceedings would frustrate the decree-
holders from reaping the benefits of the decrees/awards.
55. In execution proceedings, the Executing Court shall direct the
judgment-debtor, at the first instance i.e. first date of filing, to file the
affidavit of assets on the date of cause of action, date of the decree/award as
well as on the date of the swearing of the affidavit in Form 16A of Appendix
E under Order XXI Rule 41(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure within thirty
days. The oral prayer/application of the decree-holder for issuance of such
direction shall be sufficient compliance of Order XXI Rule 41(2) of the
Code of Civil Procedure.
56. The Executing Court is empowered, at the initial stage itself, to
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 35 of 84
restrain the judgment-debtor from transferring, alienating or disposing of or
otherwise parting with the possession of any assets to the tune of the
decretal/award amount except in the ordinary course of business such as
payment of salary and statutory dues. The Executing Court shall restrain the
judgment-debtor from discharging any financial liability, other than the
liabilities of Banks/financial institutions, without the permission of the
Executing Court.
57. If the judgment-debtor fails to appear before the Court upon service of
notice, the Executing Court shall ensure his presence initially by issuing
bailable warrants and thereafter, by issuing non-bailable warrants as per law.
58. In the event of the default of the judgment-debtor to file the aforesaid
affidavit within the stipulated time, the Executing Court shall consider
detention of the judgment-debtor in civil prison for the term not exceeding
three months under Order XXI Rule 41(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure by
directing the decree-holder to deposit the subsistence allowance @ Rs.40 per
day per person with the Executing Court for detention of the judgment-
debtor. Upon deposit of the subsistence allowance, the Executing Court
shall issue non-bailable warrants against the judgment-debtor for his
detention.
59. Since Form 16A of Appendix E under Order XXI Rule 41(2) of the
Code of Civil Procedure is not exhaustive to ascertain all the assets of the
decree-holder, this Court, in exercise of its powers under Sections 30 and
151 and Order XXI Rule 41 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with
Sections 106 and 165 of the Indian Evidence Act and Article 227 of the
Constitution of India, has formulated following three affidavits: -
Annexure A1 - Affidavit of assets and income of the judgment-
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 36 of 84
debtor;
Annexure B1 - Affidavit of assets and income of a
proprietorship firm/partnership firm/HUF/company/trust as a
judgment-debtor;
Annexure C1 - Affidavit of expenditure of the judgment-
debtor.
60. The aforesaid affidavits are very comprehensive and are useful to
determine whether the judgment-debtor has the means to satisfy the
decree/award. In the aforesaid affidavits, the judgment-debtor is required to
disclose his occupation and income from all sources in the last five years;
particulars of immovable properties in his name as well as joint names;
financial assets including all bank accounts, DEMAT accounts, safety
deposit lockers; investments including FDRs, stocks, shares, insurance
policies, loans, foreign investments; movable assets including motor
vehicles, mobiles, computer, laptop, electronic gadgets, gold, silver and
diamond jewellery etc.; intangible assets; garnishee(s)/trade receivables;
corporate/business interests; disposal and parting away of properties;
properties acquired by the family members, inheritance. A salaried
judgment-debtor has to disclose the particulars of his employment including
salary, D.A., commissions, incentives, bonus, perks, perquisites and other
benefits, Income Tax, pension and retirement benefits etc. A self-employed
judgment-debtor has to disclose the nature of business/profession, share in
business/profession, net worth of the business, number of employees,
amount of regular monthly withdrawals, Income Tax, net income, annual
turnover/gross receipts, gross profits etc. The judgment-debtor is also
required to disclose the income from other sources, namely, agricultural
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 37 of 84
income, rent, interest on bank deposits and investments, dividends, profit on
sale of movable/immovable assets, mutual funds, annuities etc. The
judgment-debtor is also required to disclose whether he has ever been
arrested or kept in detention; whether any Court has issued bailable/non-
bailable warrants against him; whether he has ever been released on
bail/anticipatory bail; whether he has ever been prosecuted and/or convicted;
whether he has ever been declared as proclaimed offender/proclaimed
person; particulars of all pending litigations, decided/disposed off litigations
as well as unsatisfied decrees/awards. The judgment-debtor is further
required to disclose his standard of living and lifestyle, namely, credit/debit
cards, membership of clubs and other associations, loyalty programmes,
social media accounts, domestic helps and their wages, mode of travel in
city and outside city, category of hotels for stay, category of hospitals for
medical treatment, frequency of foreign travel, frequent flyer cards, brand of
mobile, wrist watch, pen, expenditure ordinarily incurred on family
functions, festivals and marriage of family members, etc. Annexure C1
requires the disclosure of expenditure on housing, household expenditure,
maintenance of dependents, transport, medical expenditure, insurance,
entertainment, holiday and vacations, litigation expenses, discharge of
liabilities etc.
61. The Executing Court shall direct the judgment-debtor, at the initial
stage itself, to file an affidavit of his assets and income in the format of
Annexure A1 along with documents mentioned therein within thirty days. If
the judgment-debtor is a proprietor of a proprietorship firm/ partner of a
partnership firm/member of an HUF /Director/Promoter of a company/
Managing Trustee of a Trust, the judgment-debtor be directed to file an
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 38 of 84
additional affidavit in respect of the assets and income of the firm/HUF
/Company/Trust, as the case may be, in the format of Annexure B1.
62. After examining Annexure A1, the Executing Court may direct the
judgment-debtor to file an additional affidavit of his expenditure in the
format of Annexure C1.
63. If the judgment-debtor is a Firm/Company/HUF/Trust, the Executing
Court shall direct the judgment-debtor to disclose its assets and income in
the format of Annexure B1 within 30 days. The affidavit of the Firm/
Company/HUF/Trust shall be sworn by all Partners/Directors/ Promoters
(other than independent/non-executive and nominee directors)/Members
/Karta/ Trustees, as the case may be.
64. In pending execution cases, if the judgment-debtor has not already
filed the affidavit of assets and income, the Executing Court shall direct the
judgment-debtor to file the affidavit of his assets and income in terms of this
judgment.
65. If the facts of the case so require, the Executing Court may, in order to
facilitate execution proceedings, direct the parties to make compilation/
extracts from the accounts/other data and present the assets and income in a
tabular form, duly supported by an affidavit.
66. If any ground for lifting of the corporate veil of a judgment-debtor
company is made out as per law, then all the Directors/Promoters (other than
independent/non-executive and nominee directors) of the judgment-debtor
Company shall be directed to disclose their personal assets and income in
the format of Annexure A1.
67. The Executing Court shall ensure that the filing of the affidavits by
the judgment-debtor is not reduced to a mere ritual or formality. If the
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 39 of 84
affidavits of the judgment-debtor are not in the prescribed format or are not
accompanied with the relevant documents, the Court may take the affidavits
on record and grant reasonable time to the judgment-debtor to remove the
defects/deficiencies and simultaneously act on the information available in
the deficient affidavit as per law.
68. If any objections are filed raising claims such as HUF character or
transfer, agreement to sell, mortgage, tenancy etc. to the property of the
judgment-debtor (as existing on the date of the institution of proceedings in
which decree was passed), the Executing Court may direct the objector to
file a detailed affidavit along with all relevant documents evidencing his
claim including subsequent conduct in relation thereto.
69. Upon filing of affidavit in Form 16A of Appendix E under Order XXI
Rule 41(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure and the additional affidavits
namely Annexures A1, B1 and C1, the decree-holder shall verify the
disclosures made in the affidavits, either himself or through an investigator.
In appropriate cases, the Executing Court may order investigation by a
Government Agency including a forensic audit, cost of which shall be borne
by the decree-holder.
70. If the judgment-debtor does not truly disclose all his assets and
income, the decree-holder is at liberty to serve the interrogatories under
Order XI of the Code of Civil Procedure and/or seek production of relevant
documents from the judgment-debtor.
71. In appropriate cases, Court may order interrogatories, discovery,
inspection, production of any document and/or order any fact to be proved
by affidavit under Section 30 of Code of Civil Procedure.
72. The Executing Court shall, thereafter, consider whether the oral
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 40 of 84
examination of the judgment-debtor is necessary under Section 165 of the
Indian Evidence Act. If the Executing Court consider it necessary, the
Executing Court shall examine the judgment-debtor to elicit the truth. The
principles relating to the scope and powers of the Court under Section 165 of
the Evidence Act have been summarized in Ved Parkash Kharbanda v.
Vimal Bindal, (2013) 198 DLT 555, which may be referred to.
73. Sections 51(b), 60 to 64 and Order XXI Rules 41 to 57 of the Code of
Civil Procedure contain the provisions for attachment of properties in
execution. Before attaching a property, the Executing Court shall ensure that
the property does not fall in the list of properties which are exempt from
attachment/sale under the Proviso to Section 60(1) of the Code of Civil
Procedure. The Executing Court shall ensure the compliance of Sections 60
to 64 and Order XXI Rules 41 to 57 of the Code of Civil Procedure with
respect to the attachment of properties in execution of decrees.
74. If the judgment-debtor does not satisfy the decree/award despite
having means/capacity to pay, the decree-holder has to file an application for
his detention whereupon the Executing Court shall issue a show cause notice
to the judgment-debtor to show cause as to why he should not be committed
to civil prison. The Executing Court shall, upon being satisfied that the
judgment-debtor has means to pay the decretal amount or substantial part
thereof and has refused or neglected to pay the same, pass an order for
detention of the judgment-debtor in civil prison for a period not exceeding
three months in terms of Section 58(1)(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Even after release from detention, the judgment-debtor shall remain liable to
satisfy the decree/award in terms of Section 58(2) of the Code of Civil
Procedure. The Court shall follow the procedure laid down in Sections 51(c),
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 41 of 84
55 to 59 and Order XXI Rules 37 to 40 of the Code of Civil Procedure for
detention of the judgment-debtor.
75. In appropriate cases, the Executing Court may issue any of the
following directions:- (i) Issue notice and direct the Garnishee(s) to deposit
in Court the amount due to the judgment-debtor as per law; (ii) Permit the
decree-holder to inspect all the assets and the records of the judgment-debtor
in the presence of the Local Commissioner to be appointed by the Court; (iii)
Direct the auditor of the judgment-debtor company to submit a report with
respect to the affairs of the judgment-debtor company; (iv) Permit the
decree-holder to serve interrogatories on the auditors of the judgment-
debtor; (v) Permit the decree-holder to inspect the records of the judgment-
debtor with the Income Tax and the other authorities to verify the
disclosures made by the judgment-debtor; (vi) Appoint a receiver in respect
of the attached properties of the judgment-debtor and (vii) In extreme cases,
appoint a Chartered Accountant as a Local Commissioner to inspect all the
records of the judgment-debtor and submit a report to the Court with respect
to the affairs of the judgment-debtor.
76. The Executing Court shall pass appropriate order of restitution to
reimburse the loss suffered by the decree-holder on account of delay and
obstruction in the execution proceedings caused by the judgment-debtor.
The Executing Court shall endeavour to place the decree-holder in the same
position as he would have had been if the decree had been satisfied soon
upon it being passed.
77. Imposition of actual, realistic or proper costs and/or ordering
prosecution would go a long way in controlling the tendency of introducing
false claims by the judgment-debtor. The cost should be equal to the
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 42 of 84
benefits derived by the litigants, and the harm and deprivation suffered by
the rightful person so as to check the frivolous litigations and prevent the
people from reaping a rich harvest of illegal acts through Court. The costs
imposed by the Courts must be the real costs equal to the deprivation
suffered by the rightful person and also considering how long they have
compelled the other side to contest and defend the litigation in various
courts. In appropriate cases, the Courts may consider ordering prosecution
otherwise it may not be possible to maintain purity and sanctity of judicial
proceedings.
78. If the judgment-debtor makes a false claim/statement in his/her
affidavit, the decree-holder is at liberty to invoke Section 340 Cr.P.C for
prosecution of the judgment-debtor under Section 209 of IPC. Whenever a
false claim is made before a Court, it would be appropriate, in the first
instance, to issue a show cause notice to the judgment-debtor to show cause
as to why a complaint be not made under Section 340 Cr.P.C. for having
made a false claim under Section 209 of the Indian Penal Code and a
reasonable opportunity be afforded to the judgment-debtor to reply to the
same. If the facts are sufficient to return a finding that an offence appears to
have been committed and it is expedient in the interests of justice to proceed
to make a complaint under Section 340 Cr.P.C., the Court need not order a
preliminary inquiry. But if they are not and there is suspicion, albeit a strong
one, the Court may order a preliminary inquiry. For that purpose, it can
direct the State agency to investigate and file a report along with such other
evidence that they are able to gather. Once it prima facie appears that an
offence under Section 209 IPC has been made out and it is expedient in the
interest of justice, the Court should not hesitate to make a complaint under
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 43 of 84
Section 340 Cr.P.C. Reference be made to Sanjeev Kumar Mittal v. State,
174 (2010) DLT 214 for principles relating to Section 340 Cr.P.C and H.S.
Bedi v. National Highway Authority of India, 2016 (227) DLT 129 for
principles relating to Section 209 IPC.
79. The directions contained in para 57 (vii) and (viii) of the judgment
dated 05th
December, 2019 with respect to the power of the Executing Court
to restrain the judgment-debtor from leaving the country without permission
and to impound the passport of the judgment-debtor, are for the present,
recalled. However, this issue is kept pending and will be taken up for
further hearing upon which appropriate orders would be passed.
80. These modified directions/guidelines shall apply to all execution
proceedings, such as the execution proceedings under Section 36 of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act; execution proceedings before Motor
Accident Claims Tribunals; execution proceedings before the SDM
empowered to execute decree/award as arrears of land revenue; execution
proceedings before Debt Recovery Tribunals and execution proceedings
under Consumer Protection Act.
81. The affidavits formulated by this Court namely Annexures A1, B1
and C1 or such of the information from the affidavits as is considered
necessary, can be directed to be filed in any proceedings in which the Court
considers it necessary to ascertain the financial capacity or status of a party
such as proceedings under Order XXXVIII of the Code of Civil Procedure
and proceedings under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
The Arbitral Tribunals are also empowered to direct a party to file the
aforesaid affidavits i.e. Annexures A1, B1 and C1 or such of the information
from the affidavits as is considered necessary, in the proceedings under
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 44 of 84
Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act to ascertain the financial
capacity/status of a party.
82. The affidavit of assets, income, expenditure and liabilities is to be
treated as guidelines to determine the true financial capacity/status of the
judgment-debtor. The Courts are at liberty to determine the nature and extent
of information/documents necessary and to direct the judgment-debtor to
disclose relevant information and documents to determine the financial
capacity/status. The Courts are at liberty to pass appropriate directions as
may be considered necessary to do complete justice between the parties.
83. The Courts below shall expedite the execution proceedings and shall
make an endeavour to decide the execution cases within one year of
institution. The Courts below shall send the list of all pending execution
cases which are more than one year old, through their District Judges. The
list shall contain the name of the case; date of institution; number of hearings
that have taken place; whether the judgment-debtor has filed the affidavits in
terms of the judgment dated 05th
December, 2019 and the reasons for delay
in disposal. List be prepared according to the seniority i.e. the oldest case
shall be mentioned first. The Courts below shall also send a list of execution
cases decided in the last one year. The District Judges shall compile the list
of all its Courts and shall send them to the Registrar General of this Court by
31st December, 2020 for being placed before this Court.
84. If any counsel/litigant has any further suggestions with respect to
these directions, the same be submitted to this Court through the learned
amici curiae, Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate and Mr. Sanjiv Kakra,
Advocate, or through the Honorary Secretary of the Delhi High Court Bar
Association.
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 45 of 84
85. List for considering further suggestions, if any, on 06th
November,
2020.
86. This Court appreciates the assistance rendered by Mr. Dayan
Krishnan, Senior Advocate and Mr. Sanjiv Kakra, Advocate as amici curiae
in formulating this procedure. Mr. Rajiv Nayyar, Senior Advocate; Mr.
Rajiv Virmani, Senior Advocate; Mr. Jayant Mehta, Advocate; and Mr.
Percival Billimoria, Advocate have also given valuable inputs. This Court
also appreciates the extensive research on corresponding law in other
countries by Mr. Akshay Chowdhary, Law Researcher, attached to this
Court.
87. This Court is of the view that the mandatory filing of the affidavit of
assets, income, expenditure and liabilities by judgment-debtor in a detailed
prescribed form at the very threshold of execution litigation should be
incorporated in the statutes, as in the developed countries. Let this
suggestion be considered by the Central Government. Copy of this judgment
along with Annexures A1, B1 and C1 be sent to Mr. Chetan Sharma,
learned ASG for taking up the matter with Ministry of Law and Justice.
88. The modified directions and format of the affidavits (Annexures A1,
B1 and C1) be uploaded on the website of the District Court (in .pdf format)
to enable the lawyers/litigants to download the same.
89. Copy of this judgment and modified format of affidavits of assets,
income and expenditure Annexures A1, B1 and C1 be sent to the Registrar
General of this Court who shall circulate it to all the District Judges for
being circulated to all the concerned courts.
90. Copy of this judgment be sent to Mr. Rahul Mehra, learned Standing
Counsel for GNCTD who shall circulate it to all the SDM‟s dealing with
EX.P. 275/2012 Page 46 of 84
execution cases as arrears of land revenue. The Principal Secretary
(Revenue) shall ensure the compliance of these directions by all SDMs in
execution cases.
91. Copy of the judgment along with Annexures A1, B1 and C1 be sent to
the Delhi Judicial Academy to sensitize the judges about the modified
directions laid down by this Court.
92. National Judicial Academy is reporting the best practices of the High
Courts on their website (www.nja.nic.in) under the head of Practices &
Initiatives of various High Courts. Copy of this judgment along with
Annexures A1, B1 and C1 be sent to National Judicial Academy.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
AUGUST 5, 2020
ds/dk/ak
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure A1 Page 47 of 84
ANNEXURE A1
FORMAT OF AFFIDAVIT OF ASSETS AND INCOME OF THE
JUDGMENT-DEBTOR*
I _______________________, son of / daughter of / wife of / ___________________, aged
about ____ years, resident of ___________________________, do hereby solemnly declare
and affirm as under:
S. No. Description Particulars
1. Whether you have means to satisfy the award/
decree/order? If yes, please give the proposed
Schedule of payment:
2. Name
3. Age
4. Educational Qualifications
5. Professional Qualifications
6. Occupation
7.
Monthly income from all sources including
employment, business, vocation, interest,
investment, income from properties, assets etc.
8. Current source of income as well as sources of
the income in the last five years
9. Whether you are assessed to Income tax?
10. Marital Status
11. Complete details of the immediate family
*Note 1 - If the judgment-debtor is a proprietor/partner of a Firm/member of HUF/ Director or
Promoter in a company/member of trust/society, an additional affidavit in respect of the assets
and income of the Firm/HUF/Company/Trust shall be filed by the judgment-debtor in the format
of Annexure B1.
Note 2 - All the documents attached to this affidavit have to be self-attested by the deponent.
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure A1 Page 48 of 84
members (Name, age, relation, occupation,
income, residence and office addresses in last ten
years)
12.
Addresses:
(i) Present Residential Address
(ii) Permanent Residential Address
(iii) Present Office address
(iv) E-mail
(v) Mobile No.(s)
(vi) Landline Phone No.(s)
Residence:-
Office:-
(vii) Passport No.
(viii) Aadhaar Card No.
(ix) PAN Card No.
STATEMENT OF ASSETS
S.No. Assets
List of Assets
On the date
of the cause
of action
On the date
of the
decree/
award
Present Present
Estimated
Market
Value
13.
(i) Immovable properties
Particulars of the immovable
properties including joint
properties, built up properties,
lease hold properties, land/
agricultural land and
investment in real estate such
as booking of plots, flats, etc.
in the name of judgment-
debtor or in joint names with
the judgment-debtor
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure A1 Page 49 of 84
(ii) Possession
Whether the possession of the
above properties is with the
judgment-debtor? If no, give
status of the possession
(iii) Title documents
Whether the title documents
of the above properties are
with the judgment-debtor? If
no, give status of the
possession of the title
documents
(iv) Litigation
Whether any litigation is
pending in respect of the
above properties. If so, give
particulars
14. Financial Assets/Debts
(i) Particulars of all bank
accounts including Current and
Savings Accounts in the name of
judgment-debtor or in joint names
with judgment-debtor held in the
last ten years
Note : If any bank account(s)
has/have been classified by the
banks as willful defaulter under
the Master Circular on ‗Wilful
Defaulters‘ dated 01.07.2015
[RBI/2015-16/100DBR.No.CID.
BC .22/20.16. 003/2015-16] or
Reserve Bank of India (Frauds
classification and reporting by
commercial banks and select
Financial Institutions) directions
2016 under Master Circular dated
01.07.2016(RBI /DBS/2016-17/28
DBS. CO. CFM C. BC.
No.1/23.04.001 /2016-17), give
particulars of such bank accounts.
S.No. Account
Number
Name of Bank Current
Balance
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure A1 Page 50 of 84
(ii) Particulars of DEMAT
accounts held by judgment-
debtor in last ten years
Details Current Value
of Shares
(iii) Cash in hand
(iv) Particulars of the safety
deposit lockers in the name of
the judgment-debtor or in joint
names with the judgment-
debtor
(v) Particulars of the debts/
liabilities of the judgment-
debtor
(vi) Particulars of the overdraft
facility along with name and
address of the bank, branch,
account No., type and
particulars of the security
given to secure the overdraft
15. Investments
(i) FDR(s), NSC, IVP, KVP,
Post Office schemes etc.
(ii) Deposits with Government
and Non-Government
entities
(iii) Stocks, shares, debentures,
bonds, units and mutual
funds, etc.
(iv) Insurance policies and their
surrender value
(v) Loan given to friends,
relatives and others
(vi) Details of the foreign
investments made including
those made in last ten years
Particulars Current
Value
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure A1 Page 51 of 84
or from the date of
beginning of cause of action,
whichever is later
(vii) Other investments not
covered by above items
16. Movable Assets
(i) Motor Vehicles (List of cars,
motorcycles, scooters etc.
along with their brand and
registration number)
(ii) Livestock
(iii) Plant & Equipments
(iv) Mobile phone(s)
(v) Computer/Laptop
(vi) Other electronic gadgets
including I-pad etc.
(vii) TV, Fridge, Air Conditioner,
Microwave, Washing
machine etc.
(viii) Other household appliances
(ix) Quantity of gold, silver and
diamond jewellery
(x) Quantity of silver utensils
(xi) List anything else of value
that the judgment-debtor
owns, including precious
metals, collections, works of
art, jewellery or household
items of which the cost of
acquisition is more than
Rs.25,000/- each
Particulars Cost of
Acquisition
17. Intangible assets
Intangible assets including
patents, trademark, copyright,
design, goodwill and their value
18. Garnishee(s)/Trade receivables
(i) Name(s) and addresses of
Garnishee(s) and the particulars of
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure A1 Page 52 of 84
the debt, share and other
properties recoverable from the
Garnishee(s) with complete
details of the transactions
(ii) Trade receivables along with
name, address and amount due
from each Garnishee(s)
19.
Corporate/Business Interests
Particulars of the interest/
position/ association of the
judgment-debtor, directly or
indirectly, in any corporation,
unincorporated business,
company, partnership, trust, joint
venture and Association of
Persons, Society etc. in the last
ten years or from the date of
beginning of cause of action,
whichever is later
20. Disposal and parting away of
properties
(i) Particulars of all properties
transferred/agreed to be
transferred or parted with the
possession by any mode including
sale, gift, relinquishment, General
power of attorney, Special power
of attorney, exchange, agreement,
family settlement, lease, transfer
of shareholding/investment etc. in
the last ten years or from the date
of beginning of cause of action,
whichever is later; name/address
of the transferee and the
consideration received from the
transferee(s)
(ii) Partition/severance of status/
change of status of your assets
and/or business entities such as
partnership/HUF or MOUs/
agreements etc.
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure A1 Page 53 of 84
21. Properties acquired by the family
members of the judgment-debtors
(i) Particulars of the properties
(movable/ immovable) acquired
by immediate family members of
judgment-debtor in the last ten
years or from the date of
beginning of the cause of action,
whichever is later
(ii) Whether the judgment-debtor
contributed any amount in the
above acquisition. If so, give
particulars of contribution
(iii) Details of the funds
transferred by the judgment-
debtor in the name of immediate
family members in the last ten
years or from the date of
beginning of the cause of action,
whichever is later
(iv) Details and particulars of
shares purchased/investments
made by the judgment-debtor in
the name of immediate family
members in the last ten years or
from the date of beginning of the
cause of action whichever is later
22. Inheritance
Particulars of the estate in which
the judgment-debtor is a
beneficiary of inheritance along
with market value of the property
inherited
23. Existing charges on the assets
(i) Particulars of all existing
charges on the assets including
mortgage, charge, pledge on the
assets
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure A1 Page 54 of 84
(ii) Whether the charges are
registered, and the present status
of the same
(iii) Whether any of the assets are
subject to attachment proceedings
under any Act including
Prevention of Money Laundering
Act, 2002; Income Tax Act,
1961; Benami Transactions
(Prohibition) Act, 1988 and Black
Money (Undisclosed Foreign
Income and Assets) and
Imposition of Tax Act, 2015
24. List of other assets not itemized
above
STATEMENT OF INCOME
S. No Description On the date of the
cause of action
On the date of the
decree/award
Present
25. If the judgment-debtor is a
salaried person:
(i) Designation
(ii) Name and address of the
employer
(iii) Date of appointment
(iv) Gross Income including the
salary, D.A., commissions/
incentives, bonus, perks etc.
(v) Perquisites and other benefits
provided by the employer
including accommodation,
cars/other automotive,
landline, mobile, laptop,
health insurance, sweeper,
gardener, watchman or
personal attendant, cooking
gas, electricity, water,
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure A1 Page 55 of 84
interest free or concessional
loans, holiday expenses, free
or concessional travel, free
meals, free education, gifts,
vouchers credit card
expenses, club expenses,
value of any other
benefits/perquisites/amenities
/services/privileges etc.
(vi) Deductions from the gross
income
(vii) Income tax
(viii) Net income
(ix) Value of stock option
benefits, if provided by the
employer
(x) Pension and retirement
benefits payable at the time
of retirement
Note:- If unemployed, give
particulars of last employment;
length of last employment; period
of last employment; name and
address of last employer; last
drawn monthly salary, perquisites
and other benefits provided by the
employer and last drawn annual
salary
26. 2 If the judgment-debtor is self-
employed:
(i) Nature of business/
profession
(ii) Whether the business/
profession is carried on as an
individual, sole
proprietorship concern,
partnership concern,
company or association of
persons, HUF, joint family
business or any other form.
(iii) Give particulars of your
share in the business/
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure A1 Page 56 of 84
profession
(iv) Amount of regular monthly
withdrawal or drawings from
the business
(v) Whether you are a director
or had been a director of a
company in last five years?
If so, give particulars
(vi) Details of all firms and other
business entities in which
you have/had interest in the
last five years
(vii) Whether you have taken any
loan/credit facility(s) from
banks and other financial
institutions in last five years?
If so, give particulars
(viii) Whether your accounts are
audited
(ix) Name and address of the
auditors and date of last
audit of accounts
(x) Whether you are subject to
audit under Section 44AB of
the Income Tax Act, 1961
(xi) Whether you filed a Wealth
Tax Return under the Wealth
Tax Act, 1957 prior to
abolition of Wealth Tax
Note: If the business is closed/non-
active, give the date of closure,
assets on the date of closure,
present status of the assets and if
the assets have been transferred,
the particulars of the transfer and
consideration received.
27. 3
In case of a self-employed person
/proprietorship firm:
(i) Office address and the branch
offices, if any,
(ii) Net worth of the business
(iii) Number of employees
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure A1 Page 57 of 84
(iv) Annual turnover/ gross
receipts
(v) Gross Profit
(vi) Income Tax
(vii) Net Income
(viii) Amount of regular monthly
withdrawal or drawings from
the business
(ix) Value of your business
interest(s)
(x) Value of your business assets
(xi) Location of your business
assets
(xii) Location of the statutory
records and books of account
of the business
(xiii) Details and value of benefits
in kind, perks or other
remuneration received from
the business e.g. provision of
car, payment of
accommodation etc.
28. .
In case of a Company,
partnership, HUF, joint family
business or any other form
(i) Details of registration and
incorporation
(ii) Registered Office and the
branch offices, if any, of the
judgment-debtor including all
addresses from the date of
beginning of cause of action
till the date of filing of the
present affidavit
(iii) Details of shareholding of the
partners, directors, promoters
and their family members
(iv) Details of all subsidiary
Companies and sister
concerns
(v) Net worth of the Company
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure A1 Page 58 of 84
/firm /HUF
(vi) Number of employees
(vii) Annual turnover/gross
receipts
(viii) Gross Profit
(ix) Income Tax
(x) Net Income
(xi) Amount of regular monthly
withdrawal or drawings from
the business
(xii) Value of your business
interest(s)
(xiii) Value of your business assets
(xiv) Location of your business
assets
(xv) Location of the statutory
records and books of account
of the firm
(xvi) Details and value of benefits
in kind, perks or other
remuneration received from
the business e.g. provision of
car, payment of
accommodation etc.
(xvii) Whether any partner/
Director/ member has taken
loan/ overdrawn/ taken
credit? If so, give particulars
(xviii) Has the company/firm
transferred any assets to any
Director/ partner? If so, give
particulars
29. Income from other sources
(i) Agricultural Income
(ii) Rent
(iii) Interest on bank deposits and
FDRs
(iv) Interest on investments
including deposits, NSC,
IVP, KVP, Post Office
schemes, PPF, loans etc.
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure A1 Page 59 of 84
(v) Dividends
(vi) Income from machinery,
plant or furniture let on hire
(vii) Gifts
(viii) Profit on sale of movable/
immovable assets
(ix) Mutual Funds
(x) Annuities
(xi) Any other source of income
not covered above
Note: - If you are expecting to
receive a lump sum payment in the
future, give further details
including the amount and expected
date of receipt of the payment
30. 6 Any other income not covered
above
TOTAL INCOME Annual Rs.
Monthly Rs.
PERSONAL INFORMATION OF THE JUDGMENT-DEBTOR
31. Have you ever been arrested?
32. Have you ever been kept under detention?
33. Has any Court issued bailable/non-bailable
warrants against you?
34. Have you ever been released on bail/anticipatory
bail?
35. Have you ever been prosecuted for any offence?
36. Have you ever been convicted for any offence?
37. Have you ever been declared as proclaimed
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure A1 Page 60 of 84
offender/proclaimed person by any Court?
38. If the answer to any of the above-mentioned
questions is „Yes‟, give full particulars of the
case/arrest/bail/detention/ conviction/sentence/
punishment etc.
39. Particulars of all pending litigations, disputes,
claims, arbitrations, FIR, Complaints etc. pending
in any Court, Tribunal, Forum, Authority, in which
you are a party
Give the name of the case, name of the Court,
nature of case, amount involved and the next date
of hearing
40. Particulars of all decided/disposed of litigations,
disputes, claims, arbitrations, FIR, Complaints etc.
decided in any Court, Tribunal, Forum, Authority,
in which you were party
Give the name of the case, name of the Court,
nature of case, amount involved and date of
decision
41. Particulars of all the unsatisfied decrees/awards
42. Particulars of place of residence where you have resided during the preceding five years
Period Address in full with Police Station & Distt.
along with area (in sq. ft.) of the residential
accommodation
Whether
owner/tenant? If
rented, the amount
of rent? From To
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure A1 Page 61 of 84
43. Particulars of credit/debit cards, its limit and usage
44. Membership of clubs/health clubs/gyms, societies and
other associations. Specify the membership fee and
subscription
45. Particulars of loyalty programmes of airlines, hotels,
retail chains and other merchants, to which you have
subscribed, with membership numbers of each such
programme
46. Particulars of your social media accounts, e.g.,
Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram, etc.
47. Number of part-time/full-time domestic helps and their
wages
48. Mode of travel in city/outside city
49. Category of hotels ordinarily used for stay, official as
well as personal
50. Category of hospitals opted for medical treatment
including type of rooms
51. Frequency of foreign travel, business as well as personal
52. Particulars of the countries visited till date?
53. Do you intend to travel outside India? If yes, Give
details of the visit, purpose of visit and the approximate
expenditure on the visit
54. Particulars of frequent flyer cards
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure A1 Page 62 of 84
55. Brand of mobile, wrist watch, pen, sunglasses, wallet,
bags
56. Name of school(s) where the child or children are
studying or have studied
57. Status of the judgment-debtor/family:
Below poverty line
Low
Lower Middle
Middle
Upper Middle
High
Rich and Affluent
DOCUMENTS
S. No. Document Description of Document
58. Aadhaar Card
59. Voter ID Card
60. Ration Card
61. PAN Card
62. Passport
63. Driving Licence
64. CIR/CIBIL Score
Description Please Tick
Attached NA To follow
65. Statement of Account of all bank accounts including current,
savings and DEMAT accounts of the judgment-debtor for
last three years
66. In case of salaried persons
(i) Income Tax Return(s) along with the balance sheets,
statement of income and Annexures for last five years
(ii) Appointment Letter along with salary structure at time
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure A1 Page 63 of 84
of appointment
(iii) Salary slip
(iv) Forms 16, 16A & 12BA
(v) Cost to Company Certificate
(vi) Copies of TDS certificates
67. In case of self-employed persons
(i) If the judgment-debtor carries on business in the name
of a sole proprietorship concern - Income Tax
Return(s) along with the balance sheets, Profit & Loss
Account, statement of income and Annexures of the
proprietorship firm for last five years
(ii) If the judgment-debtor is a partner in a firm - Income
Tax Return(s) along with the balance sheets, Profit &
Loss Account, statement of income and Annexures of
the partnership firm, along with the Schedule showing
the distribution of partners‟ remuneration and share of
profits/losses of the partnership firm and the copy of
the partnership deed, for last five years
(iii) If the judgment-debtor is a Director of the Company -
Income Tax Return(s) along with the balance sheets,
Profit & Loss Account, statement of income and
Annexures of the Company for last five years
(iv) If the judgment-debtor has a share in Association of
Persons, HUF, Joint Family business or Trust -
Income Tax Return(s) along with the balance sheets,
Profit & Loss Account, statement of income and
Annexures of the Association of Persons, HUF, Joint
Family business or Trust for last five years
(v) Account of the judgment-debtor in the books of the
business
(vi) GST/ VAT/ Excise/ Sales Tax registration, returns in
last five years
(vii) TDS certificates
68. In case of Income from other sources:
(i) Lease Deed(s)/ Rent Agreement(s)/ License
Agreement(s) in respect of the rental income
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure A1 Page 64 of 84
(ii) Interest Certificate in respect of the interest income on
deposits and investments
(iii) Dividend Certificates
69. Title deeds of the immovable properties of the judgment-
debtor
70. Documents relating to the debt, shares and other properties
of the judgment-debtor recoverable from the Garnishee(s)
71. Documents relating to the properties transferred, alienated or
parted with or agreed to be transferred between the date of
beginning of cause of action upto the date of filing of this
affidavit
72. Documents pertaining to any pre-existing charge on the
assets, or orders pertaining to attachment of assets by
authorities including but not limited under Prevention of
Money Laundering Act, 2002; Income Tax Act, 1961;
Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988; and Black
Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and
Imposition of Tax Act, 2015.
73. Form 26AS downloaded from the website of Income Tax
Department for the last five financial years
74. Wealth Tax Returns with all schedules and particulars for
five years prior to abolition of Wealth tax
75. Forms 3CA/3CB and 3CD, as applicable, pursuant to
Section 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 filed for the last
five years
76. Documents relating to arrest/ detention/ warrants/ bails/
prosecutions/ convictions/ declarations of being proclaimed
offender/person
77. Documents relating to the pending litigations including FIR
in which the judgment-debtor was or is involved
78. Documents relating to the decided litigations
79. Documents relating to the unsatisfied decrees/awards
80. Other relevant documents relating to assets and income
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure A1 Page 65 of 84
Declaration:
1. I declare that I have made accurate, true and complete disclosure of my income
and assets from all sources. I further declare that I have no assets, income or financial
resources other than those set out in this affidavit.
2. I undertake to inform this Court immediately upon any material change in my
income and assets or any other information disclosed in this affidavit.
3. I hereby declare that the contents of this affidavit have been duly explained to me
and have been understood by me.
4. The copies of the documents filed with the affidavit are the true copies of the
originals and I have self attested the copies after comparing them with their originals.
5. I understand that any false statement and misrepresentation in this affidavit may
constitute an offence under Section 199 read with Sections 191 and 193 of the Indian
Penal Code, 1860 punishable with imprisonment upto seven years and fine, and
Section 209 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 punishable with imprisonment upto two
years and fine. I have read and understood Sections 191, 193, 199 and 209 of the
Indian Penal Code, 1860.
DEPONENT
Verification:
Verified at ____________on this ____ day of ___________ that the contents of the
above affidavit relating to my income and assets are true to my knowledge, no part of
it is false and nothing material has been concealed therefrom. I further verify that the
copies of the documents filed along with the affidavit are true copies of the originals.
DEPONENT
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure B1 Page 66 of 84
ANNEXURE B1
FORMAT OF AFFIDAVIT OF ASSETS AND INCOME OF THE
JUDGMENT-DEBTOR*
I/we_______________________, son of / daughter of wife of / _______________________,
aged about ____ years, resident of ___________________________, am/are the
Proprietor/Directors/Promoters/Partners/Karta/Managing Trustee of the_______________
_________________ and I/we do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under:
S. No. Description Particulars
1. Whether judgment-debtor has the means to
satisfy the award/ decree/order? If yes, please
give the proposed Schedule of payment:
2. Details of registration and incorporation
3. Current address of registered office and the
addresses of registered offices in the last ten years
4. Particulars of shareholding of the judgment-debtor
and inter-se relationship of shareholders
5. Particulars of the Partners/Directors/Promoters and
other key managerial staff with their name, age,
designation, length of employment, past
employment details of past ten years, complete
residence address, their shareholding in the
Company, its subsidiaries, its joint ventures and
other associated entities
6. Name and addresses of the Partners/Directors/
Promoters on the date of the incorporation
*Note 1 - If the judgment debtor is a company, this affidavit has to be executed by all
Directors/Promoters (other than independent/ non-executive/ nominee directors); If the judgment
debtor is a partnership firm, this affidavit has to be executed by all its partners; If the judgment
debtor is a proprietorship firm, this affidavit has to be executed, by its proprietor and in case of a
trust, by its Managing Trustee.
Note 2 - All the documents attached to this affidavit have to be self-attested by the deponent.
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure B1 Page 67 of 84
7. Name and addresses of the Partners/Directors/
Promoters on the date of the beginning of the cause
of action
8. Name and addresses of the Partners/Directors/
Promoters on the date of the decree/ award was
passed
9. Name and addresses of the Partners/Directors/
Promoters on date of the affidavit
10. Name and addresses of the nominee and official
directors
11. Particulars of all related parties including
subsidiary companies, sister concerns, agencies,
distributors etc.
12. Net worth of the Business/Firm/Company
13. Number of employees
14. Location of the statutory records and books of
account of the judgment-debtor
15. Location of the business assets of the judgment-
debtor
16. Amount of regular monthly withdrawals or
drawings by each of Directors/Promoters/Partners
/Proprietor/ Trustee
17. Particulars of the transactions with the related
parties whether in the form of expenses, loans or
otherwise from the date of the beginning of cause
of action upto the date of the affidavit
18. Have any Directors/Promoters/Partners /Proprietor/
Trustee taken loan/overdrawn/credit from the
judgment-debtor? If so, give particulars
19. Has the judgment-debtor transferred any assets to
any Directors /Promoters /Partners /Proprietor/
Trustee? If so, give particulars
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure B1 Page 68 of 84
20. Particulars of the benefits received by any
Directors/Promoters/Partners/Proprietor/Trustee
from the judgment-debtor other than by way of
salary. e.g. provision of car, payment of
accommodation etc.
STATEMENT OF ASSETS
S.No. Assets
List of Assets Present
Estimated
Market
Value
On the date
of the cause
of action
On the date
of the decree
/award
Present
21.
(i) Immovable properties
Particulars of the immovable
properties including joint
properties, built up properties,
lease hold properties, land
/agricultural land and
investment in real estate such
as booking of plots, flats, etc.
of the judgment-debtor
(ii) Possession
Whether the possession of the
above properties is with the
judgment-debtor? If no, give
status of the possession
(iii) Title documents
Whether the title documents of
the above properties are with
the judgment-debtor? If no,
give status of the possession of
the title documents
(iv) Litigation
Whether any litigation is
pending in respect of the above
properties. If so, give
particulars
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure B1 Page 69 of 84
22. Financial Assets/Debts:
(i) Particulars of all bank accounts
including Current and Savings
Accounts in judgment-debtors‟
name or joint names with the
judgment-debtor held in the last ten
years
Note : If any bank account(s)
has/have been classified by the
banks as willful defaulter under the
Master Circular on ‗Wilful
Defaulters‘ dated 01.07.2015
[RBI/2015-16/100DBR.No.CID.BC.
22/20.16.003/2015-16] or Reserve
Bank of India (Frauds classification
and reporting by commercial banks
and select Financial Institutions)
directions 2016 under Master
Circular dated 01.07.2016(RBI
/DBS/2016-17/28 DBS. CO. CFMC.
BC. No.1/23.04.001 /2016-17), give
particulars of such bank accounts.
S.No. Account
Number
Name of Bank Current
Balance
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
(ii) Particulars of DEMAT
accounts held by judgment-
debtor in last ten years
Details Current Value
of Shares
(iii) Cash in hand
(iv) Particulars of the safety deposit
of lockers in the name of the
judgment-debtor or in joint
names with the judgment-
debtor
(v) Particulars of the debts/
liabilities of the judgment-
debtor
(vi) Particulars of the overdraft
facility along with name and
address of the bank, branch,
account No., type and
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure B1 Page 70 of 84
particulars of the security given
to secure the overdraft
23. Investments
(i) FDR(s), NSC, IVP, KVP, Post
Office schemes, Provident
Fund(s) etc.
(ii) Deposits with Government
and Non-Government entities
(iii) Stocks, shares, debentures,
bonds, units and mutual funds,
etc.
(iv) Insurance policies
(v) Loan given
(vi) Details of the foreign
investments made including
those made in last ten years or
from the date of beginning of
cause of action, whichever is
later
(vii) Other investments not covered
by above items
Particulars Current
Value
24. Movable Assets
(i) Motor Vehicles (List of cars,
motorcycles, scooters etc.
along with their brand and
registration number)
(ii) Livestock
(iii) Plant & Equipments
(iv) Mobile phone(s)
(v) Computer/Laptop
(vi) Other electronic gadgets
including I-pad etc.
(vii) TV, Fridge, Air Conditioner,
etc.
(viii) Any other movable assets
having cost of acquisition of
more than Rs.25,000/- each
Particulars Cost of
Acquisition
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure B1 Page 71 of 84
25. Intangible assets
Intangible assets including patents,
trademark, copyright, design,
goodwill and their value
26. Garnishee(s)/Trade receivables
(i) Name(s) and addresses of
Garnishee(s) and the particulars of
the debt, share and other properties
recoverable from the Garnishee(s)
with complete details of the
transactions
(ii) Trade receivables along with
name, address and amount due
from each Garnishee(s)
27. Corporate/Business Interests
(i) Particulars of the interest/
position/ association of the
judgment-debtor, directly or
indirectly, in any corporation,
unincorporated business,
Company, partnership, trust, joint
venture and Association of
Persons, Society etc. in the past ten
years or from the date of beginning
of cause of action, whichever is
later
(ii) Complete details of all the
subsidiary Companies, their
operations and balance sheets for
the past ten years or from the date
of beginning of cause of action,
whichever is later
28. About disposal of properties
(i) Particulars of properties
transferred/agreed to be transferred
or parted with the possession by
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure B1 Page 72 of 84
any mode including sale, gift,
relinquishment, General Power of
Attorney, Special Power of
Attorney, exchange, agreement,
family settlement, lease, transfer of
share holding/investment etc. in the
past ten years or from the date of
beginning of cause of action,
whichever is later; name/address of
the transferee and the sale
consideration received from the
transferee(s)
(ii) List of properties that have
ever been in judgment-debtors‟
name or in which judgment-debtor
had any right/ interest
29. Existing charges on the assets
(i) Particulars of existing
charges on the assets of the
judgment-debtor including
mortgage, charge, pledge on the
assets
(ii) Whether the charges are
registered, and the present status of
the same
(iii) Whether any of the assets
are subject to attachment
proceedings under any Act
including Prevention of Money
Laundering Act, 2002; Income Tax
Act, 1961; Benami Transactions
(Prohibition) Act,1988 and Black
Money (Undisclosed Foreign
Income and Assets) and Imposition
of Tax Act, 2015
30. List of other assets not itemized
above
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure B1 Page 73 of 84
STATEMENT OF INCOME
S. No Description On the date of
the cause of
action
On the date of
the award/decree
Present
31. Income from business/profession
(i) Annual turnover / gross
receipts
(ii) Gross Profit
(iii) Income Tax
(iv) Net Income
Note: If the business is closed/non-
active, give the date of closure,
assets on the date of closure,
present status of the assets and if
the assets have been transferred,
the particulars of the transfer and
consideration received
32. Income from Other Sources
(i) Agricultural Income
(ii) Rent
(iii) Interest on bank deposits and
FDRs
(iv) Interest on investments
including deposits, NSC,
IVP, KVP, Post Office
schemes, PPF, loans etc.
(v) Dividends
(vi) Income from machinery,
plant or furniture let on hire
(vii) Profit on sale of movable/
immovable assets
(viii) Any other sources of income
not covered above
Note: - If the judgment-debtor is
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure B1 Page 74 of 84
expecting to receive a lump sum
payment in the future, give further
details including the amount and
expected date of receipt of the
payment
33. Any other income not covered
above
OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION
34. Whether the Proprietor / Partners /Directors /Promoters /
Trustees/ other key persons of the judgment-debtor have
ever been arrested?
35. Whether the Directors/Promoters/Partners/Proprietor/
Trustees/ other key persons of the judgment-debtor have
ever been kept under detention?
36. Whether any Court issued bailable/non-bailable warrants
for appearance of Directors/Promoters/Partners/Proprietor/
Trustees/ other key persons of the judgment-debtor?
37. Whether the Directors/Promoters/Partners/Proprietor/
Trustees/ other key persons of the judgment-debtor have
ever sought bail/anticipatory bail?
38. Whether the Directors/Promoters/Partners/Proprietor/
Trustees/ other key persons of the judgment-debtor have
ever been prosecuted for any offence?
39. Whether the Directors/Promoters/Partners/Proprietor/
Trustees/ other key persons of the judgment-debtor have
ever been convicted for any offence?
40. Whether the Directors/Promoters/Partners/Proprietor/
Trustees/ other key persons of the judgment-debtor have
ever been declared as proclaimed offender/ proclaimed
person?
41. If the answer to any of the above-mentioned questions is
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure B1 Page 75 of 84
„Yes‟, give full particulars of the case/
arrest/bail/detention/conviction/sentence/ punishment etc.
and/or the details of the case
42. Details of all litigations, disputes, claims, arbitrations
FIR‟s, Complaints etc. pending in any Court, Tribunal,
Forum, Authority, Arbitrator, etc. in which judgment-
debtor is a party
Give the details of the case, name of the Court, nature of
case, amount involved and the next date of hearing
43. Details of all litigations, disputes, claims, arbitrations
FIR‟s, Complaints etc. decided by any Court, Tribunal,
Forum, Authority, Arbitrator, etc. in which judgment-
debtor was a party
Give the details of the case, name of the Court, value of
case, amount involved and date of decision
44. Particulars of the unsatisfied decrees/awards against the
judgment-debtor
45. Details of loan/credit facility(s) taken from banks and
other financial institutions in the last five years and the
present status
46. Details of the charitable institutions or other bodies in
which judgment-debtor made donations, gifts, grants, etc.
in last ten years or from the date of beginning of cause of
action, whichever is later
47. Name and address of the auditors and date of last audit of
accounts
48. Whether the Proprietor / Partners /Directors /Promoters/
Trustee of the judgment-debtor intend to travel outside
India? If yes, Give details of the visit, purpose of visit and
the approximate expenditure on the visit
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure B1 Page 76 of 84
DOCUMENTS
S. No. Document Description of Document
49. Aadhaar Card
50. Voter ID Card
51. Ration Card
52. PAN Card
53. Passport
54. Driving Licence
55. CIR/CIBIL Score
Description Please Tick
Attached NA To follow
56. Statement of Account of all bank accounts including current,
savings and DEMAT accounts of the judgment-debtor for
last three years
57. (i) If the judgment-debtor is a sole proprietorship concern
- Income Tax Return(s) along with the balance sheets,
Profit & Loss Account, statement of income and
Annexures of the proprietorship firm for last five years
(ii) If the judgment-debtor is a partnership firm - Income
Tax Return(s) along with the balance sheets, Profit &
Loss Account, statement of income and Annexures of
the partnership firm, along with the Schedule showing
the distribution of partners‟ remuneration and share of
profits/losses of the partnership firm and the copy of
the partnership deed, for last five years
(iii) If the judgment-debtor is a Company - Income Tax
Return(s) along with the balance sheets, Profit & Loss
Account, statement of income and Annexures of the
Company for last five years
(iv) If the judgment-debtor in an Association of Persons,
HUF, Joint Family business or Trust - Income Tax
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure B1 Page 77 of 84
Return(s) along with the balance sheets, Profit & Loss
Account, statement of income and Annexures of the
Association of Persons, HUF, Joint Family business or
Trust for last five years
(v) GST/ VAT/ Excise/ Sales Tax registration, returns in
last five years
(vi) TDS certificates
58. In case of Income from other sources:
(i) Lease Deed(s)/ Rent Agreement(s)/ License
Agreement(s) in respect of the rental income
(ii) Interest Certificate in respect of the interest income on
deposits and investments
(iii) Dividend Certificates
59. Title deeds of the immovable properties of the judgment-
debtor
60. Documents relating to the debt, shares and other properties
of the judgment-debtor recoverable from the Garnishee(s)
61. Documents relating to the properties transferred, alienated or
parted with person or agreed to be transferred by the
judgment-debtor
62. Documents pertaining to any pre-existing charge on the
assets, or orders pertaining to attachment of assets by
authorities including but not limited under Prevention of
Money Laundering Act, 2002; Income Tax Act, 1961;
Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988; and Black
Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets)and
Imposition of Tax Act, 2015
63. Form 26AS downloaded from the website of Income Tax
Department for the last five financial years
64. Forms 3CA/3CB and 3CD, as applicable, pursuant to
Section 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 filed for the last
five years
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure B1 Page 78 of 84
65. Documents relating to arrest/ detention/ warrants/ bails/
prosecutions/ convictions/ declarations of being proclaimed
offender/person
66. Documents relating to the pending litigations including FIR
in which the judgment-debtor was or is involved
67. Documents relating to the decided litigations
68. Documents relating to the unsatisfied decrees/awards
69. Other relevant documents relating to assets and income
Declaration:
1. I/we declare that I/we have made accurate, true and complete disclosure of income
and assets of the judgment-debtor from all sources. I/we further declare that the judgment-
debtor has no assets, income or financial resources other than those set out in this affidavit.
2. I/we undertake to inform this Court immediately upon any material change in the
income and assets of the judgment-debtor or any other information disclosed in this
affidavit.
3. I/we hereby declare that the contents of this affidavit have been duly explained to me
and have been understood by me.
4. The copies of the documents filed with the affidavit are the true copies of the originals
and I/we have self attested the copies after comparing them with their originals.
5. I/we understand that any false statement and misrepresentation in this affidavit may
constitute an offence under Section 199 read with Sections 191 and 193 of the Indian Penal
Code, 1860 punishable with imprisonment upto seven years and fine, and Section 209 of
the Indian Penal Code, 1860 punishable with imprisonment upto two years and fine. I/we
have read and understood Sections 191, 193, 199 and 209 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
DEPONENT
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure B1 Page 79 of 84
Verification:
Verified at ____________on this ____ day of ___________ that the contents of the above
affidavit relating to the income and assets of the judgment-debtor are true to my/our
knowledge, no part of it is false and nothing material has been concealed therefrom. I/we
further verify that the copies of the documents filed along with the affidavit are true copies
of the originals.
DEPONENT
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure C1 Page 80 of 84
ANNEXURE C1
FORMAT OF AFFIDAVIT OF EXPENDITURE*
I _______________________, son of / daughter of / wife of / ___________________, aged
about ____ years, resident of ___________________________, do hereby solemnly declare
and affirm as under:
STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURE
S. No. Description
Amount
(in Rs.)
Per Month
1. Housing (i) Monthly rent
(ii) Mortgage payment(s)
(iii) Repairs & Maintenance
(iv) Property tax
2. Household Expenditure (i) Groceries/Food/Personal care/clothing
(ii) Water
(iii) Electricity
(iv) Cooking Gas
(v) Telephone
(vi) TV Cable/Set-top Box & Internet
services
(vii) Domestic full time/part time helper(s)
(viii) Others (specify)
3. Maintenance of Dependents (i) Parents
*
Note 1 - All the documents attached to this affidavit have to be self-attested by the deponent.
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure C1 Page 81 of 84
(ii) Children
(iii) Others
4. Transport (i) Personal Vehicle(s) along with the details
(a) Driver(s)
(b) Fuel
(c) Repair/Maintenance
(d) Insurance
(ii) Public Transport
(a) Bus
(b) Taxi
(c) Metro
(d) Auto
5. Medical Expenditure (i) Doctor
(ii) Medication
(iii) Hospital
(iv) Others (specify)
6. Insurance (i) Life
(ii) Annuity
(iii) Householders
(iv) Medi-claim
7. Entertainment &
Recreation
(i) Club
(ii) Health Club
(iii) Gym
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure C1 Page 82 of 84
8. Holiday & Vacations
9. Legal/litigation Expenses
10.
Discharge of Liabilities
(i) Credit card(s) payment
(ii) Hire purchase/lease
(iii) Repayment of Loans
(a) House loan
(b) Car loan
(c) Personal loan
(d) Business loan
(e) Any other loan
(iv) Name of the lenders
(v) Mode of repayment
(vi) Instalment amount
(vii) Other liabilities
11. Miscellaneous (i) Newspapers, magazines, books
(ii) Religious contributions/ Charities
(iii) Donations, gift and grants
12. Pocket Money/Allowance
13. Other Expenditure (Not specified above)
Total Expenditure
Monthly Rs.
Annual Rs.
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure C1 Page 83 of 84
DOCUMENTS
S. No. Documents Please Tick
Attached NA To follow
14. Documents relating to expenditure on :
(i) Housing including Rent and maintenance
receipts
(ii) Household expenditure including electricity,
water, security, cooking gas bills, mobile and
landline phone bills, internet services bills, TV
cable/ Set-Top Box bills, salary paid to the
employees including domestic help(s)
(iii) Maintenance of dependents
(iv) Education of children including tuition fees
(v) Conveyance & transport including salary of
driver(s)
(vi) Medical expenditure
(vii) Insurance policies along with receipts of
premium of insurance policies
(viii) Entertainment and recreation including
expenditure on health clubs, gym.
(ix) Holidays and vacations
(x) Debit and Credit Card statements of all cards
(xi) Repayment of the loans
(xii) Frequent Flier‟s Card statements
(xiii) PPF, EPF and other superannuation fund receipts
(xiv) Receipts of payments in respect of mutual funds
(xv) Payment of interest on bank and other loans
(xvi) Payment of taxes, including Income Tax and
Property Tax
(xvii) Other relevant documents relating to expenditure
EX.P. 275/2012 - Affidavit – Annexure C1 Page 84 of 84
Declaration:
1. I declare that I have made accurate, true and complete disclosure of my
expenditure from all sources. I further declare that I have no expenditure other
than those set out in this affidavit.
2. I undertake to inform this Court immediately upon any material change in
my expenditure or any other information disclosed in this affidavit.
3. I hereby declare that the contents of this affidavit have been duly explained
to me and have been understood by me.
4. The copies of the documents filed with the affidavit are the true copies of the
originals and I have self attested the copies after comparing them with their
originals.
5. I understand that any false statement and misrepresentation in this affidavit
may constitute an offence under Section 199 read with Sections 191 and 193 of the
Indian Penal Code, 1860 punishable with imprisonment upto seven years and fine,
and Section 209 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 punishable with imprisonment
upto two years and fine. I have read and understood Sections 191, 193, 199 and
209 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
DEPONENT
Verification:
Verified at ____________on this ____ day of ___________ that the contents of the
above affidavit relating to my expenditure are true to my knowledge, no part of it
is false and nothing material has been concealed therefrom. I further verify that the
copies of the documents filed along with the affidavit are true copies of the
originals.
DEPONENT