www.sliceintelligence.com | [email protected] | @sliceintel
Jet.com:How will it land?
© Copyright Slice Intelligence. 2016. All rights reserved. 2
contextJet.com officially launched in July 2015 by Marc Lore, founder of Diapers.com, which was acquired by
Amazon in 2010. Backed by more than $700 million in venture capital funding, Jet is ready and willing
to take on retail behemoths Amazon, Walmart, Target, and Costco online. Jet’s business model is a hybrid
retail/marketplace model where it is selling products from its own inventory while encouraging partner
retailers to use Jet as a platform to sell their own products, and Jet receives affiliate fees.
Originally, Jet’s plan was to fund itself with a membership model, taking little margin on products, but
the company pivoted away from that model in October 2015. This pivot may have been driven in part
by a fear that consumers wouldn’t pay $50 for membership given that Jet is new on the landscape. The
company claims that this pivot was the result of better-than-expected performance by its proprietary Smart
Cart technology. The goal of the Smart Cart is to align consumer incentives with merchant economics.
Consumers are encouraged throughout the shopping process to take actions that will save them money,
such as adding items to their shopping cart, or agreeing to forgo the ability to return an item.
Jet has shed some light on its business, releasing gross merchandise value figures through October, but
there are many other questions that merchants have, particularly around whether they should view Jet as
a competitor or as a potential partner.
• How healthy is Jet’s business?
• What are people buying on Jet.com?
• Does Jet’s Smart Cart work?
• Will Jet be able to grow sustainably?
• Is Jet stealing business from established online retailers like Amazon and Walmart?
topline growth is strongFueled by significant advertising dollars and expansive media coverage, Jet has enjoyed strong
sales growth since launching in July 2015. In the figure below, we see monthly total sales (including
first-party, Concierge, and Marketplace sales) from September 2015 through February 2016. Sales have
grown well, by an average of 28 percent per month from September through February. While sales did
slow after the holiday season, February 2016 sales were still 50 percent higher than September.
Jet has said that it plans to spend on advertising (reports have that number between $100 million in the first
year, and up to $25 million per month), so it is reasonable to expect that strong growth can be sustained
for the foreseeable future.
© Copyright Slice Intelligence. 2016. All rights reserved. 3
repeat purchase rates raise some concernWhile revenue growth has been strong, Jet is heavily dependent on acquisition of new, or first-time,
customers. By December, 80 percent of revenue was from new customers; only 20 percent was from
repeat customers. By February, 30 percent of sales were from repeat customers, a welcome improvement.
Another key metric, orders per person, shows weakness. Since Jet launched in July, Jet customers have
purchased 1.5 times, compared with 2.2 for Target.com and 2.1 for Walmart.com. It is too early to conclude
that Jet has a retention problem, but going forward, both of these metrics will be key indicators of Jet’s
ability to sustain growth.
Jet.com monthly sales trend
sales from the first time vs repeat Jet shoppers
pro
ject
ed re
venu
e
© Copyright Slice Intelligence. 2016. All rights reserved. 4
Jet sales by category resemble Amazon, but heavier on CPGJet’s breakout of sales by category has a roughly similar composition to that of Amazon. Electronics is
the largest category, accounting for 24 percent of sales. About 40 percent of Jet sales are in consumer
packaged goods (CPG) categories.
The chart below compares Jet’s sales contribution by category against Amazon’s. Positive indexes
indicate that Jet generates a larger share of sales in those categories than Amazon. Negative indexes
suggest that Jet generates a smaller share of sales than Amazon. CPG categories represent the most
significant over-indexes versus Amazon, while Apparel and Books are the categories where Amazon
indexes the most strongly compared to Jet.
Jet.com composition of category sales compared with amazon
Jet’s Smart Cart showing good resultsJet.com has touted its Smart Cart as its secret sauce – a sophisticated engine that matches supply pools
with consumers willing to upsize their shopping carts. Of course, Jet’s $35 minimum order size to qualify
for free shipping is a potent enticement for shoppers to add additional items to their carts as well.
-6%
Apparel & AccessoriesBooks
Toys & Games
Automotive
ShoesSports & Outdoors
Music
Movies & TV
Appliances
Software & Mobile Apps
Jewelry & Watches
Pet Supplies
Electronics & Accessories
Baby Products
Health & Beauty
Home & Kitchen
Grocery & Gourmet Food
Tools $ Home Improvements
-4% -2% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10%
© Copyright Slice Intelligence. 2016. All rights reserved. 5
It appears that the combination of these two factors have indeed driven larger units per order for Jet than
its competitors. Jet averages four items per order (from launch through February, 2016), compared with
less than three for Amazon, Walmart, Target, Costco, and Sam’s. If we isolate only shopping carts with
at least one CPG item, Jet’s items per order average is 5.2, compared with 3.4 for Sam’s – the strongest
amongst Jet’s direct competitors.
A significant contributor to Jet’s larger baskets is a high rate of multi-unit purchases of the same item.
Twenty percent of items purchased on Jet are in increments of greater than one. This compares with 13
percent for Walmart and 14 percent for Target. It may be that the operative cog in the Smart Cart is Jet’s
simple practice of discounting when consumers buy multiples of the same item.
Jet modestly taking wallet share from AmazonAt current sales levels, Jet is still small, especially compared with Amazon. The month with the strongest
competitive share story for Jet is February 2016, when Jet sales accounted for 19 percent of Wamart.com
sales – a significant feat considering the focus that Walmart has placed on e-commerce.
Another view of competitive impact is a wallet share analysis of Jet against its principal competitors where
we evaluate shifts in spending by merchant amongst Jet customers since launch. Here we see that before
Jet launched, the people that became Jet customers spent 88 percent of their online wallets (within a
competitive set of Amazon, Walmart, Target, Costco and Sam’s) with Amazon. In the months after Jet’s
launch, however, Amazon owned only 78 percent of Jet customers’ wallets among this set. So it does seem
that Jet is impacting Amazon, albeit modestly, at this point.
items per order (only includes baskets with at least 1 CPG item)
Walmart
Target
Sam’s Club
Jet
Costco
Amazon
© Copyright Slice Intelligence. 2016. All rights reserved. 6
our take: complexity may deter many buyers in an era of convenienceBased upon Jet’s quick sales ramp-up, it seems that consumers are willing to try a new merchant that
offers a novel approach to saving money. We believe that the complexity of saving money on Jet is going
to deter many shoppers that value convenience over finding the lowest prices. The result is that Jet may
isolate a particularly price-sensitive group of shoppers that are willing to work and compromise to achieve
savings. There is ample precedent for this in US retail: Club stores require a membership fee, huge pack
sizes, and often long drives. Black Friday provides an annual reminder as well. The key question is how big
this segment is.
our take: experimentation with Jet by manufacturers is worthwhileGiven Amazon’s dominance in e-commerce in the U.S., manufacturers are eager for a legitimate Amazon
alternative out of a desire for negotiating leverage. Manufacturers’ early hesitation about Jet
centered on concern about pricing degradation given Jet’s membership model. However, since dropping
the membership fee, it seems that Jet’s prices are more likely to be higher than Amazon’s rather than lower
(see a December 2015 study from Revionics) – at least before consumers begin extracting savings through
Jet’s Smart Cart incentives. Smart Cart savings are often generated by compelling consumers to buy more
of a particular item, locking in consumers longer. There is potential for Jet’s Smart Cart to allow for less
blunt price promotion opportunities for manufacturers than are typically available because of the consumer
engagement that the Smart Cart requires. Again, the key will be whether this is a material segment or not.
our take: Jet’s long-term sustainability is not a foregone conclusionWe believe that success or failure for Jet is going to come down to consumers’ willingness to
repeatedly engage with Jet’s Smart Cart – essentially, to play a cost-savings game that creates a
complex three-way win between Jet, the manufacturer, and the consumer (and sometimes a
merchant partner). Jet’s executives are is smart enough to pull off this complex feat, but the following
are the key metrics that we’ll be watching in the months to come in order to see whether the model is
working or not.
• Repeat purchase rates – After going through the shopping experience, do consumers feel that it
was worth it? Will Jet become a habit?
• Continued expansion of user base – Can Jet’s marketing efforts continue to expand its user base?
• Sustained ability to drive high units/order – Will Jet be able to sustain, or grow, basket sizes with
its Smart Cart?
© Copyright Slice Intelligence. 2016. All rights reserved. 7
[email protected]@sliceintel
ken cassarprincipal analyst, vice president
Ken Cassar is vice president, principal analyst at Slice Intelligence, where he looks at
trends in the e-commerce industry armed with Slice’s robust set of online sales data.
Ken brings a rich online retail background to Slice Intelligence. Most recently, Ken
was SVP, Media Analytic Solutions at Nielsen, where he developed several innovative
digital commerce measurement and advertising effectiveness solutions. Prior to
Nielsen, Ken was an analyst at Jupiter Research, where he was an early thought
leader, trusted adviser, and media source on e-commerce. His prescient outlook on
fledgling e-commerce industry was a key contributor to Jupiter’s dominance as a
digital media zeitgeist at the dawn of the Internet.
Ken has an MBA and Bachelors Degree in Political Science from the University of
Connecticut. Ken aspires to stay technologically ahead of his teenage children, as
evidenced by his ‘Gadget Geek’ Slice profile. He also has the appropriate jacket for
every occasion.
[email protected]@sliceintel
leslie warshawvice president, analyst solutions
Leslie Warshaw is currently works with Slice Intelligence as the vice president of
analytic solutions, and is responsible for working with consumer package goods
clients.
Before joining Slice Intelligence, Warshaw was global senior vice president of
product development for Lightspeed Research and TNS, responsible for product
development, marketing, and sales of panels and custom online marketing research
communities. She is also a veteran of the Nielsen Company, where she was vice
president of product development and sales. At Nielsen, Warshaw played an
instrumental role in the development of ground breaking products that linked online
behavior with purchasing as a way to measure the sales ROI of targeted online
advertising.
In the start-up world, she assisted with the early stage development of both Usamp
(Instant.ly) and InfoScout as those businesses entered the market research space;
bringing new technology and new data collection methodologies.
© Copyright Slice Intelligence. 2016. All rights reserved. 8
about slice intelligenceWith a panel of over 4 million online shoppers, Slice Intelligence directly measures
all digital commerce activity from the consumer. By collecting and cataloging actual
shopping behaviors from online shoppers in the wild, Slice Intelligence precisely
measures what others have only been able to approximate, revealing new insights
about online shoppers and their behaviors.
Slice Intelligence’s retailer-independent methodology captures commerce as it
happens at the item level, across all merchants. While most companies rely upon
panels of online users or of people who scan or take pictures of their receipts, Slice
measures all online shopping activity directly gathered from consumers’ purchases.
This allows Slice Intelligence to collect more data, at a higher level of quality than
other methods. This intelligence gives clients unparalleled insights about everything
their customers buy, even when shopping elsewhere, eliminating the need to use
less reliable and less actionable a research products.
Because we extract information from email receipts, we are able to capture all
purchases on any and all devices. This “hands-off”, device-agnostic approach
to measurement solves many of the challenges that have plagued online and
household scanning panels, without the gaps that inherently occur due to
inconvenience, multiple device usage and panel recruitment challenges.
Only Slice Intelligence measures all online purchases, using the same methodology,
tied to the same consumer, including that consumer’s historical purchase patterns to
reveal loyalty and switching behavior, and brand affinities.
Slice Intelligence comes from a methodology developed at Stanford that extracts
online purchase data from e-receipts in consumers’ inboxes. This refined data
collection method enables impeccable, near real-time data from a global panel of 4
million people, the largest panel of online shoppers anywhere.
Slice Intelligence is led by a team of measurement industry executives who have
brought some of the most innovative and successful digital measurement products to
market.
© Copyright Slice Intelligence. 2016. All rights reserved. 9
methodologySlice Intelligence uses a proprietary technology that was developed by machine-
learning scientists from Stanford University. Slice Intelligence’s technology identifies
e-receipts within inboxes, extracts every available data point about every purchase
at the item level, normalizes measurements across retailers and structures the data
into an industry-wide taxonomy and catalog. All this happens at high speed and
accuracy, and is reported daily.
With 4 million panelists, Slice Intelligence has the largest, most representative panel
of online shoppers. Recruited through sources including: partners who leverage the
Slice API to create new compelling online experiences; the popular Slice shopping
utility which enables shoppers to organize, track, and manage their online purchases;
and the Unroll.Me service which reduces inbox clutter.
Our methodology provides near real-time data that is representative of the U.S.
online population and correlates closely to the U.S. Department of Commerce and
public disclosures by online retailers.