Download - John Deere Case
![Page 1: John Deere Case](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082512/550192634a7959c0558b477e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
John Deere Case Analysis
![Page 2: John Deere Case](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082512/550192634a7959c0558b477e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
QUESTION 1
What are the strengths and weaknesses of the current costing system (data on exhibit 9)?
![Page 3: John Deere Case](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082512/550192634a7959c0558b477e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
ANSWER 1Weakness
• System was ineffective for costing and bidding individual parts.
• The large dispersion (ranging from 50- 60% on some parts and 200-300% on others questions the validity of standard cost system for determining cost of individual parts.
• Machine hours are not based on product unit thus leading to erroneous allocation of costs.
• Budgeted overhead rates computed on actual past charges ( and asking the question whether there will be any changes) this was again not reliable as the production volume was changing year after year.
• Employee benefit based on machine hours.
Strengths
• The strengths of the current costing system lie in its simplicity of allocations. The allocation of overhead is done on the basis of direct labor and direct machine hours.
• Required less computing effort.• Satisfactory at aggregate level due to large volume of products
• With the increased usage of automated machines designed method of adopting ACTS (actual cycle time standard) rate was a good approach.
• System was evolved to take care of period overheads and product overheads.
![Page 4: John Deere Case](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082512/550192634a7959c0558b477e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
QUESTION 2
What are the strengths and weaknesses of the suggested costing system (data on exhibit 10)?
![Page 5: John Deere Case](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082512/550192634a7959c0558b477e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
ANSWER 2
Weakness
• Requires a complete modification of the existing system. A lot of rework is needed to identify drivers, collect data and implement ABC.
• Still there are some costs (administrative etc.) which cannot be traced down to activity level.
• Too much of details can lead to diffusion of decisions.
• Time consuming.
Strengths
• Overheads can be better allocated based on activities ( DL support, machine operations, setup hours, production order activity, material handling, parts administration and general and administrative overheads.)
• Because of tracking of costs using activities variations in cost allocation can be reduces.
• Drivers for activities can be identified and monitored for better decision making.
• Improve profitability by better depiction of product life cycle costs.
![Page 6: John Deere Case](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082512/550192634a7959c0558b477e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
QUESTION 3
Reasons why the contingency situation arises?
![Page 7: John Deere Case](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082512/550192634a7959c0558b477e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
ANSWER 3
Contingency situation arises due to the following reasons:
•Improper allocation of costs•Improper allocation of overheads•Wrong identification of cost driver
![Page 8: John Deere Case](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082512/550192634a7959c0558b477e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
QUESTION 4
Calculate the cost of A103 based on current cost system and proposed cost system and explain
![Page 9: John Deere Case](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082512/550192634a7959c0558b477e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
ANSWER 4
STANDARD METHOD:
Total Cost = Direct Labor + Direct Materials + Overhead
Direct Labor = .185 labour hours x 12.76/hr = 2.36
Direct Materials = 6.44
Overhead = Direct + Period
Direct Labour OH = 2.05 x .185 x 12.76 = 4.89
Machine Hours OH = 27.56 x .310 = 8.54
Materials Handling OH = .097 x 6.44 = 0.62
Total Cost (per 100 parts) = $22.88
![Page 10: John Deere Case](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082512/550192634a7959c0558b477e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
ANSWER 4
ABC METHOD:
Total Cost = Direct Labor + Direct Materials + Overhead
Direct Labor = .185 x 12.76 = 2.36
Direct Materials = 6.44
Overhead:
Labour Support OH = 1.11 x .185 x 12.76 =2.62
Machine Operation OH = (8.99 + 6.71) x .031 = 5.15
![Page 11: John Deere Case](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082512/550192634a7959c0558b477e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Machine Setup OH = (33.76 x 4.2 x 2) / 80 = 3.54
Production Order OH = (114.27 x 2) / 80 = 2.86
Materials Handling OH = 19.42 x 4 = 0.97
Parts Admin. = (487 x 1) / 80 = 6.09
General and Admin. = (.091 x 12.76) x (.187) + 21.23 = 2.14
Total Cost (per 100 parts) = $32.21