Download - Joseph de Pencier
![Page 1: Joseph de Pencier](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081414/54b66cd14a79598d358b45f0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
2015 World Anti-Doping Code v. 2.0
Major Proposals(and a few gratuitous observations)
Tackling Doping in Sport – March 2013Joseph de Pencier, CEO, iNADO
![Page 2: Joseph de Pencier](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081414/54b66cd14a79598d358b45f0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: Joseph de Pencier](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081414/54b66cd14a79598d358b45f0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: Joseph de Pencier](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081414/54b66cd14a79598d358b45f0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Seven Areas of Major Change
• New ADRVs• Hearing Requirements• Tougher Sanctions• Contaminated Products/Substances of Abuse• Investigations• TUEs• WADA’s New Roles
![Page 5: Joseph de Pencier](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081414/54b66cd14a79598d358b45f0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
New ADRVs
• 2.3: Evading or Refusing Sample Collection• 2.5: Tampering– Includes interference with DCO (offensive conduct
to DCOs to be covered by other rules) • 2.9: Complicity in an ADRV– By “any other Person”
• 2.10: Prohibited Association – By an Athlete
![Page 6: Joseph de Pencier](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081414/54b66cd14a79598d358b45f0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Hearing Requirements• 8: “…a fair hearing…within a reasonable time by a
fair and impartial tribunal. …reasoned decision specifically including an explanation of the reason(s) for any period of Ineligibility shall be publicly reported.”– Eight enumerated elements in 2009 Code replaced by:
“…a fair hearing … as set forth in Article 6.1 of the European Convention on Human Rights and comparable principles generally accepted in international law.”
![Page 7: Joseph de Pencier](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081414/54b66cd14a79598d358b45f0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Tougher Sanctions• 10.2/10.3: 4 years for ADRV involving any Prohibited Method or a
Prohibited Substance in the classes of Anabolic Agents, Peptide Hormones, Growth Factors and Related Substances, Hormone and Metabolic Modulators, or Diuretics and Other Masking Agents [major doping], or for evading, refusing or tampering, unless neither intentional nor reckless
• 10.3.3/10.3.4: 1-2 years for whereabouts failures or missed tests, or prohibited association, depending on degree of fault
• 10.4: range of sanctions for Specified Substances, Contaminated Substances or Substances of Abuse depending on degree of fault– Substances of Abuse sanctions can also be reduced by participation in
rehabilitation programme
![Page 8: Joseph de Pencier](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081414/54b66cd14a79598d358b45f0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Contaminated Products/Substances of Abuse
• 10.4.2: Contaminated Products may attract lesser sanction– “…could not have know [product] contained a
prohibited substance.”• 10.4.3: Substances of Abuse may attract lesser
sanction– To be defined by Prohibited List
![Page 9: Joseph de Pencier](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081414/54b66cd14a79598d358b45f0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Investigations
• 20.3.9/20.5.8: automatic IF/NADO investigation of ASP where minor or multiple athletes involved (why the limit?)
• 20.3.13/20.5.9: IF/NADO cooperation with WADA investigations
• 20.7.10: WADA power to investigate• 10.5.3 (Comment): need to protect integrity of
investigations in cases of Substantial Assistance
![Page 10: Joseph de Pencier](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081414/54b66cd14a79598d358b45f0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
TUEs• 4.4.3.2: – Athlete with NADO TUE “should apply” to IF for a
TUE, although mutual recognition “encouraged”– (IF refusing to recognise NADO TUE unlikely to grant
one to that athlete for the same prohibited substance)
– IF refusal to recognise NADO TUE invalidates that TUE – athlete must seek WADA review, or NADO must appeal to CAS (and if neither is successful?)
– No guidance on process for mutual recognition
![Page 11: Joseph de Pencier](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081414/54b66cd14a79598d358b45f0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
WADA’s New Roles• Conduct Investigations (20.7.10)• Identify individuals with whom association is prohibited (2.10)• Determine violations of “Spirit of Sport” (4.3.1.2)• Sort out authority to test (5.3.2)*• Approve blood analysis labs (6.1)• Approve sport-specific testing menus (6.4)• Sort out results management authority (7.1)*• Approve reduced sanctions for prompt admission (10.2.4)*• Approve reduced sanctions for substantial assistance, and confidentiality
agreements about it (10.5.3)*• Approve specialised testing and sample analysis (20.7.9)• Why not have WADA determine TUE disputes too? (4.4.3)*
*To avoid tribunal costs and inconsistent decisions?
![Page 12: Joseph de Pencier](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081414/54b66cd14a79598d358b45f0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Questions?