June 13, 1995
Los Angeles County
Metropolitan
Transportation
Authority
425 South Main Street
Los Angeles, CA
9oo~3q393
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
UPDATE ON ACQUISITION OF PERMANENTSUBSURFACE EASEMENTS THROUGH THEHOLLYWOOD HILLS
213.972.6ooo
BACKGROUND
At its May 24, 1995 meeting, the MTA Board of Directors was requested to hold apublic hearing and adopt a Resolution of Necessity authorizing the commencement ofeminent domain proceedings to acquire permanent subsurface easements (PSE) fromapproximately 84 properties. The properties are located in the Hollywood Hills alongthe alignment of the Metro Rail Segment 3 tunnel alignment between theHollywood/Highland and Universal City stations.
Approximately 30 property owners were present at the meeting and addressed theBoard concerning the staffs request to initiate condemnation action. The Boarddeferred any action on the adoption of the resolution for 30 days and requested staff towork with the property owners during the 30 days and report back to the Board on allactions taken.
ACTIONS TAKEN SUBSEQUENT TO BOARD MEETING
The Real Estate, Construction and Public Affairs staffs immediately made plans tohold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the project and torespond to all questions raised by the property owners. A meeting was held onWednesday, May 31, at the Campo De Cahuenga in Studio City. A meeting noticewas sent to all property owner notifying them of the meeting. Approximately 35property owners attended the meeting.
Staff members from Real Estate, Construction and County Counsel madepresentations and answered questions raised by the property owners. A writtenresponse to frequently asked Real Estate questions was prepared as a hand-out andwas distributed at the meeting (Attachment 1). The issues raised at the meeting the property owners were primarily in the following areas:
¯ The selection of the alignment through the Hollywood Hills.
¯ The involvement of property owners during the selection process.
MTA Board of DirectorsJune 13, 1995Page 2
¯ The effect of the tunnel on the future value of their properly.
¯ The possible effect of noise and vibration from the train operations and MTA’s responsibilityto mitigate damages.
¯ The possible effect of the tunnel construction and operations on the seismic activity in thearea.
Responses were given at the meeting and staff is following up with the following actions:
¯ Mailed follow-up package of information to each property owner on June 8 which includedmaterials requested at the meeting related to public participation in the Metro Red LineProject environmental process (Attachment 2).
¯ Agreed to prepare deed reservation language which would reserve to owners and to theirsuccessors specified rights with respect to the project, particularly with regard to noise andvibration and perhaps other future damage issues. Agreement is being prepared by CountyCounsel.
¯ Arrange to have a seismic expert from the California Institute of Technology address the nextmeeting of the Metro Red Line North Hollywood Extension Citizen’s Committee and inviteproperty owners to attend.
¯ Assign MTA Real Estate Staff to complete the acquisition process.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
Staff has reviewed the construction schedule and determined that the construction need date canbe divided into two groups.
Starter Tunnel Easements
Running Tunnel Easements
July 26, 1995
October 1, 1995
Based on the revised schedule, staff will recommend that the request to adopt the Resolution ofNecessity presented at the May 24th meeting be withdrawn. A new public hearing will bescheduled for the July 26 Board Meeting to adopt a resolution for the two parcels that are neededfor the starter tunnel. MTA Real Estate staff will continue negotiations with those propertyownerS~n an effort to complete the acquisition through negotiations.
The Real Estate staff will continue to communicate with the remaining property owners toaddress their concerns and to complete the acquisitions through negotiations. Those parcels notacquired to meet the October 1, 1995 construction need date will be brought back to the Board atits September meeting.
The Real Estate, Construction, Public Affairs and County Counsel staff are committed tocontinue working with the community to address their issues.
Prepared by Velma C. Marshall
Attachment "i"
RESPONSES TO FREQUENTLY ASKED REAL ESTATE QUESTIONS
APPRAISAL QUESTIONS
Q1. Will the MTA send an owner a copy of the appraisal of his property?
Upon request, owners of one to three dwelling unit properties are entitled to review MTAappraisals of their property. Please note that in this instance, the appraisal is of asubsurface easement found to have a nominal value and is not an appraisal of the full valueof the property.
Q2. Is Just Compensation based on nominal value or market value?
Just Compensation is the fair market value of any taking by the MTA as determined by anappraisal. The offered amount presented to the property owner will be this amount orhigher, but never less. Nominal value is presumed to exist where there is no perceptibledift~rence in the market value of the entire property, before and after the taking. Inessence, the taking has little or no market value. Since under most circumstances, aproperty owner cannot be expected to convey an interest in property without receivingsome compensation, the appraiser determines a nominal value for the taking that is basedupon his research, analysis and experience. Based on the appraisal, the MTA hasdetermined that this nominal value is considered to be the fair market value of the taking.
Q3. What market information do you have that shows that a permanent subsurfaceeasement for a subway makes no perceptible difference on the market value of theentire residential property?
There is no market information that exist for a situation comparable to the type ofacquisitions involved here; i.e. the acquisition of extremely deep subsurface easements thatrun through rock formation. In this case the appraiser had to reach his opinion of valuebased on conclusions drawn from engineering and environmental studies that (1) thetransit construction and operation will not result in any significant adverse impacts fromnoise or vibration; (2) the tunnel construction and operations will not result in damage existing improvements nor interfere with the current or future highest and best use of theland; (3) ttiere is no difference in the highest and best use before and after the acquisitionand (4) there is no damage to the remainder as a result of the subsurface easement. Theappraiser concluded that the presence of a permanent subsurface easement will not affectthe value of the surface improvements. Market studies that have been performed on landvalues near or adjacent to rail stations have shown that properties that are near railstations have experienced an increase in value.
Q4. Is the nominal value the same for all residential property easements?
The nominal valuation for all "Like" properties is the same. The types of propertyincluded single family residences, multifamily residences, and commercial developments.
Real Estate ResponsesPage 2
QS.
A.
Q6.
Q7.
A.
QS.
Are your appraisals done in-house or by independent appraisers?
The appraisal of the subsurface easements were performed by independent appraisers.
Please identify the company or individuals who performed the appraisals of ourproperties?
All of the subsurface easement appraisals were prepared by Michael Popwell, CGREA, ofMeza and Madrid Development, Inc., and reviewed by independent, fee appraiser, TaylorDark, MAI.
Will granting the easement affect, in any way, the development of my property?
No, the tunnels are so deep, ranging from 150 to 900 feet below grade, that futuredevelopment will not be affected.
In arriving at a nominal value for the easement, were severance damages and/orfuture damages considered?
Yes, the primary function of the appraisal was to determine the fair market value of thesubsurface easements and to estimate the severance damage, if any, to the parentproperties. A remainder property results when subtracting the permanent subsurfaceeasement from the parent property. The appraiser concluded that there was nodifferentiation between the remainder properties’ existing utility or use and that of theparent properties before the taking. The only difference found would be the existence ofthe permanent subsurface easement itself. Consequently, since there would be no damagesto the parent properties, severance and/or future damages were not warranted.
NEGOTIATIONS/ACQUISITION QUESTIONS
Q9.
A.
Will the MTA accept counteroffers? How can counter offers be made?
Th~ MTA will consider counteroffers, particularly if they are accompanied withinformation that would support the amount of the counteroffer. /vlTA will review theinformation submitted and determine whether there is a basis to accept the counteroffer.Any counteroffer should be made in writing to the MTA Director of Real Estate, Velma
C. Marshall.
Q10. What happens if an MTA offer is rejected?
If the MTA offer is rejected and it appears that a settlement cannot be reached, the MTAReal Estate staff will notify the property owner that a public hearing is being scheduledbefore the MTA Board of Directors to consider the adoption of a Resolution of Necessityto acquire the property through the eminent domain process. If the Board adopts theresolution, a condemnation action will be filed with the Superior Court of the County of
Real Estate ResponsesPage 3
Los Angeles. However, the MTA staff will continue to work with property owners toreach a settlement prior to trial.
Qll.
A.
Q12.
What effect, if any, will granting of the easement have upon my mortgage?
This depends upon the language in your mortgage contract. You should review your loandocuments to determine what your lender requires, if any interest in the property isconveyed to a third party. If you have some doubts about this issue, you may wait untilthe MTA has filed a condemnation suit. At your request, the MTA will name themortgagor in the suit and this will protect you from any action by the mortgagor.
In recording the easement deeds at the County Recorder’s Office, does MTA pay forall fees connected with the recording?
A. Yes.
CONSTRUCTION/OPERATIONS RELATED QUESTIONS
QI3. Does granting the easement release the MTA from any responsibility or liabilityfrom damage created, caused or resulting from construction work?
No. If there is any damage to your property as a result of MTA construction, a claimmay be made to the MTA Risk Management Construction Claim Department.
Q14. Will the MTA compensate property owners for all damages to properties and allcosts incurred in seeking recovery?
Any physical damage to your property caused by the construction or operation of theproject should be processed as an insurance claim. If noise or vibration occurs whichunreasonably interferes with the beneficial use of the property, a claim should be made tothe MTA. "If the insurance carrier in the former instance, or the MTA in the latterinstance, concurs in the damage, there will be no cost to you in seeking recovery. If theclaim is disputed, the property owner may bring an action against the MTA. Successfulplaintiffs in such cases usually recover damages and costs.
Q15. Does MTA have an indemnification agreement in place to protect property ownersfrom losses or damages to their property?
A. No. (See responses to Questions 13 and 14 above.
Real Estate ResponsesPage 4
QI6.
A.
Q17.
Q18.
Q19.
Q20.
Can you assure me that a vent shaft will not be located on my property?
No, not at this time. The construction of the twin tunnels will require the construction ofa mid-line vent shaft and several alternative locations will be studied. Potentially affectedproperty, owners will be notified prior to a decision by the MTA Board on the selected
site.
Are maps available showing the subsurface easement boundaries and maps showingvertical cross sections of the project as it affects individual properties?
A parcel plat map is customarily included with every Offer Letter submitted to a propertyowner. This map shows the boundaries of the easement take area in relationship to theparent property. A Property Identification drawing is available which shows the alignmentof the tunnel through the mountains and a copy is available at this meeting for yourreview. Bulky documents and publications, such as parcel cross-sectional views and theEnvironmental Impact Reports, are available for viewing at the MTA offices located at
818 West 7th Street, Los Angeles.
Will you send out proposed plans for the construction and operation of the Projectwithin the targeted easement areas?
No. Copies of construction plans are available for a fee and may be obtained bycontacting the Records Management Center, ATTN: Judith Butler, 818 West 7th Street,Los Angeles, 90017 (213) 244-7074.
How soon after signing the agreement or easement deed can I expect to receivepayment?
Once the agreement and/or easement deed and related documents has been signed,notarized, and submitted to MTA, a check will be processed and mailed to you in two to
four weeks.
After granting the easement, will MTA’s approval be required for futuredevelopment of the property?
The MTA has the fight to review all building plans that may affect the tunnels. However,with the tunnels at 150 feet to 900 feet below residentially zoned properties, there is anextremely low likelihood that any proposed construction would pose a threat to the safetyof the tunnels.
I
Attachment "2"
MLos Angeles CounD’
MetropolitanTransportation
Authority
West Seventh Street
Suite 300os Angeles, CA 9oo~7
z~3.97z.6ooo
Mallim3 Address:
P.O. Box 194Angeles, CA 90o53
June 8, 1995
Bassan & Maryann Mechammil3797 Cahuenga BoulevardNorth Hollywood, CA 91604
Dear Bassan & Maryann Mechammil
A meeting was held on Wednesday, May 31, 1995 at theCampo de Cahuenga with property owners affected by thefuture construction of the MTA Metro Red Line tunnel. Wewould like to express our appreciation to the thirty ormore of you who were able to attend.
The MTA cou~L~itted to provide copies of the informationthat was distributed at the meeting to all of theproperty owners. Enclosed is a composite list of thequestions that have been asked regarding the MTAappraisal and acquisition process for the subsurfaceeasements and questions regarding construction andoperation issues. This document was handed out at themeeting.
As you know, the Public Hearing held by the MTA Board onMay 28th was continued for 30 days in order to permit thestaff to meet with property owners regarding the manyissues raised at the meeting. Staff will recommend thatthe Public Hearing be canceled for the June 28thmeetingin order to permit more time to resolve many of the openissues with you.
Responding to the requests made by many of you the MTAproposes to take the following actions:
MTA will proceed to acquire the two most northerlyof the parcels required for the tunnelconstruction. Follow-up will be made to theproperty owners and a public hearing will berescheduled for July 26 for parcels C3-402 and C3-406. These two parcels are needed earlier than theremaining parcels.
The real estate staff will continue to work withthe remaining property owners over the next twomonths to remove as many of their objections toaccepting the MTA offer as possible. Ifnegotiations are unsuccessful, it would then be theintent of staff to again schedule the publichearing.
June 8, 1995page 2
It was announced at the May 31st meeting that the MTA hasagreed to double its initial offer to property owners asan administrative settlement for the acquisition of thesubsurface easements. We were asked to put this inwriting and this letter is our confirmation of thatoffer.
Also, at the Wednesday night meeting, MTA counsel agreedto prepare a purchase agreement with language which wouldreserve to owners and to their successors specifiedrights with respect to the project, particularly withregard to noise and vibration and other future damageissues. This document along with the MTA SubsurfaceEasement Deed will be sent to property owners as soon asitis available.
A number of questions were asked at the meeting regardingpublic notification and involvement in the planningprocess. In response we are enclosing the "SummaryReport for Reconstruction of Public Participation for theMetro Red Line Project" This report describes thepublic involvement process for the Metro Red LineProject. .
There were also a number of questions about the tunnelsand earthquakes. We are arranging to have a seismicexpert from the California Institute of Technologyaddress the next meeting of the Metro Red Line NorthHollywood Extension Citizen’s Committee. When thearrangements have been completed we will send you aninvitation to attend.
If you have additional requests, or would like toschedule a meeting to discuss MTA’s offer to purchase asubsurface easement, please feel free to contact Mr. JohnFurby, Senior Real Estate Officer at (213) 244-6722 Mr. James Wiley, Manager of Acquisition Services at (213)244-6404.
Sincerely,
VELMA C. MARSHALLDirector of Real Estate
Enclosurescc: MTA Board Members
SUMMARY REPORTFOR
RECONSTRUCTIONOF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
FORTHE METRO RED LINE PROJECT
Prepared forRail Construction Corporation
818 W. 7th StreetLos Angeles, CA 90017
Prepared byEngineering-Science, Inc.
199 South Los Robles AvenuePasadena, CA 91101
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This summary report was prepared for the Los Angeles County MetropolitanTransportation Authority/Rail Construction Corporation (MTA/RCC) underContract Number EN025, Contract Work Order 005. The purpose of this reportwas to develop a record of the public involvement process for the entire Metro RedLine Project from 1986 to 1989.
The public awareness and involvement process for the Metro Red Line Project wasdocumented and included the following activities:
¯ Special meetings held at various locations;
Newspapers publications, Metro News Bulletin and RTD Transit Reader forall the public hearings held and minutes taken, including testimonies ofspeakers and attendants from those meetings;
¯ Letters and comments from private individuals and organizations;
¯ Signed petitions from the public in favor of a subway route throughHollywood Boulevard; ......
¯ Certificates of transmission and delivery for the project documents to privatecitizens and Federal and Local Agencies; and
¯ Distribution lists for the project documents to Federal, State, and Local
Agencies.
The reviewed documents are summarized in the attached spreadsheet (seeAttachment 1). These documents are available at RCC Environmental Compliance.Additional information regarding this report can be obtained from Mr. Jim Sowell,Mana~;er of Environmental Compliance, at (213) 244-6730.
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION (CANDIDATE ALIGNMENT 1 - MODIFIED)
The MTA/RCC is constructing a 17.3 mile Metro Red Line subway system. TheRed Line consists of 3 segments. Segment 1, which extends from Union Station toWestlake/MacArthur Park, has been constructed and is currently in operation.Segment 2 is divided into two alignments: the Wilshire Corridor alignment and theVermont/Hollywood alignment. The Wilshire Corridor alignment begins on
e:\pat\recon sk. doc 1 01/20/94
Wilshire Boulevard, between Alvarado Street and Parkview Street and extendswestward to the intersection of Western Avenue and Wilshire Boulevard. TheVermont/Hollywood alignment begins at the intersection of Wilshire Boulevardand Vermont Avenue and extends northward to the intersection of HollywoodBoulevard and Vine Street. Segment 3 will stretch from the intersection ofHollywood Boulevard and Vine Street through Universal City to LankershimBoulevard in North Hollywood.
A layout of the three segments, a detailed map of Segment 2, and the LocallyPreferred Alternative are shown as Figures 2-1, 2-2, and 2-3.
3.0 RESEARCHED DOCUMENTS
To reconstruct the public involvement process, MTA/RCC (formerly RTD) andother Agency’s files on the Metro Red Line Project were thoroughly searched andevaluated. During this search, the following individuals were contacted to provideinformation regarding the Metro Red Line Project:
Name
Gabriele Maul-Crumby
Judith A. Butler
Dorothy Peyton Gray
Glen Aguora
Bob Waters
Agency
Transit SystemsDevelopment Division
(TSD) of RTDRTD RecordsManagement Supervisor
MTA Librarian
Los Angeles CityDepartment ofTransportation
RTD Board Secretary’sOffice
Document
Stored files index list.
Files at Alameda Storagefacility (operated by FirstAmerica RecordsManagement.)
Public Consultation PlanMilestone Reports, DraftSEIS/SEIR November1987,Final SEIS/SEIR July1989.Mobility ActionCommittee HollywoodGroup meeting files andLaurel Canyon Groupmeeting files.Information from themicrofilm retrieved.
e:\pat\reconsk.doc 2 01 t20/94
I-IGURE 2-1
0
SEGMENT 3 SEGMENT 2
ISEGMENT 1
FIGURE 2-2
Wl. SlUR E BLMO
WILSHIRE/WESTERN
WILSHIRE/
WILSHIRE/NORMANDIE
FIGURE 2-3
SCRTD MI-IRO RAIL
LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVEWILSHIRE,/VERMONT/HOLLYWOOD BLVD. SUBWAY
LPA ADOPTED BY SCR’I’D BOARD OF DIRECTORS JULY 14, 1988
OLYMPIC BLVD
18
SUBWAY
STATION
POTENTIAL RISK
OPERABLE SEGMENTTERMINUS STATIONS
STATION IND.(MO$- t
l UNION ~TATiON2 CIVIC CENTER3 RFTH/I-IlU_4 SEVENTH/F1.0WER5 WILSHIRF_,/ALVARAD 0
6. WILSHIRE,/VI~9~ONT1’. WiLSHIRE/NORMANDIE8. WII_~HIRE,/WE:SI"ERNo. VERMONT/BEVERLY
1o. VE:RMONT/,~NTA MONICA11. VERMONT/~UNSET12. HOllYWOOD/WESTERN13. HOllYWOOD/VINE14. HOLLYWOOD/HIGHLAND15. UNIVERSAL CITY16. NORTH HOllYWooD
4.0 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
During the development of this Project, public involvement was encouraged. Aseries of community meetings were held between January 1986 and June 1986.These meetings were held for the Vermont Corridor, Western Avenue Corridor,Fairfax Corridor, Olympic-Pico Corridor, Wilshire Corridor, and HollywoodCorridor (see Attachment 1 for the times and locations). In compliance with theCongressional mandate, and to identify and study candidate alignments that wouldavoid tunneling through any portion of the risk zones identified in the Task ForceReport, SCRTD established the Congressional Ordered Re-Engineering (CORE)Study. The "Task Force Report on the March 24, 1985, Methane Gas Explosion andFire In The Fairfax Area", dated June 10, 1985, identified specific zones wheresubsurface conditions indicated a "potential risk" or "potential high-risk" ofencountering methane gas during subsurface excavations (See Figure 2-3).Accordingly, public input was solicited and received for the CORE Study through aseries of community meetings; public hearings and open committee meetings of theRTD Board of Directors; and briefings with elected officials, business andcommunity organizations and public agencies. SCRTD also established the COREForum to encourage elected officials, entrepreneurs, and community leaders toparticipate in the review process and to comment on the preferred routes andmodes for the realignment of the Metro Rail project. TheCORE Forum had 137members (see Attachment 2) and they met four times (see Attachment 1 for
times and locations).
On February 20, 1987, the public was notified of the completion of the Draft SEIR.Copies of DSEIR were mailed to private individuals, Federal and Local Agencies,and public and major universities libraries within the CORE Study area. RTD helda public hearing on the DSEIR. Letters, comments and questions were receivedfrom the public throughout this period. On April 24, 1987, the SCRTD Board ofDirectors adopted Candidate Alignment 4 (Vermont/Sunset) as the LocallyPreferred Alter~native (LPA). That decision drew major opposition from thebroadcasting industries along Sunset Boulevard. Their major concern was theimpact of noise, vibration and electromagnetic interference on their studios.
On July 13, 1987, the public was notified of the completion ~f a Supplemental EISon Alternative Alignments developed to avoid tunneling under the methane gas risk
zones. Written public comments and responses were received during a 30-daycomment period which closed on August 17, 1987.
On October 1987, the City Council authorized the establishment of an IndependentTechnical Review Panel, comprised of four highly qualified professionals. Mr.
e:\pat\reconsk.doc 3 01/20/94
Frederick Llewellyn chaired the Panel. The other members were Mr. Carl Hanson,Mr. Mas Hatano, and Mr. Ralph Trefney. The Panel was established in order toassure a thorough and independent review of both the SCRTD findings and studioconcerns regarding the potential noise, vibration and electromagnetic interferenceimpacts on the operation of recording and broadcasting studios on Sunset
Boulevard. The Panel met three times (see Attachment 1 for times and locations).They conducted meetings in a public setting and all parties were afforded the fullopportunity to testify and to provide information relevant to its charges. Thefindings of the Independent Technical Review Panel were presented to theTransportation and Traffic Committee of the Los Angles City Council on November
13, 1987.
On November 17, 1987, the Draft SEIS/SEIR was made available to the public anda public hearing was scheduled for December 18, 1987. Public comments andresponses were received until January 2, 1988.
On December 17, 1987, the comment period for the Draft SEIS/SEIR was extendedfrom January 2 1988 to January 27, 1988 in order to allow more time for publicinput. On January 28, 1988, in addition to the other five candidate alignments theBoard authorized consideration of Candidate Alignment 6 to mitigate the impact ofthe Sunset Boulevard alignment on broadcasters. On May 20, 1988, an Addendumto the Draft SEIS/SEIR was made available to the publiiz’and a public hearing wasscheduled for Tuesday, June 21, 1988. Following the public hearing on June 21,1988, the City Planning Commission adopted Candidate Alignment 1 - Modified asthe new LPA and on July 14, 1988, the SCRTD Board also adopted CandidateAlignment 1 - Modified as the new LPA for inclusion in the Final SEIS/SEIR. TheFinal SEIS/SEIR was made available to the public in July 1989.
01/20/94e:\pat\reconsk.doc 4
ATTACHMENT 1
METRO RED LINE PUBLIC INVOLVMENT IN 1986JANUARY MARCH ’APRIL MAY [UNE ULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER 9CTOBER NOVEMBER
Milestone 4
First round of
eight
Community
held b/w Jen. 29
end Feb. 3
Wed,, Jan. 29,
1986 et 7 pro,
tour public
We|tern Ave.
Corridor:
International
Brotherhood of
Wotkera H~II.
4189W. 2nd St.
F~irlax Corridor:
Women’~
Council House,
543 N. Fnirlox
Vermonl Co~ridor;
~re~tlr Lo~
Angeles Press
FEBRUARYRevised
Milestone I
Report for
PCP,
Feb, I. 1986.
three
meetlnge
were held
in the
Corridors
of Western
Ave..
OIymplclPico,
end
Vermont.
Feb. 3, 1986,
another
meeting
wes held in
the Fe|rfex
Corridor.
These
meetingl
were held
the January
meetings.
Milestone 3
Interim
Report for
PC on
Cendidete
Alignments
end Stations
for Further
Study.
March 11.
Iolal of B
Community
meetings
were held,
Comments
an d
wire
received.
’At Fe]rfex
Corridor:
Meetings
were held
,12 p,m and
7 p.m et
Yeblon
Culturel
Center. 721
Beverly Blvd.
Vermont
April 7 - Notice
of Intent to
prepare s SEIS
for Publicedon
in the Federel
Register.
Millstone Z
Report for the
Subsurface
Conditions
Study.
Milestone 3
Dreft
Summery
Reporl for PC
on 2nd Level
Evaluetlon of
Alignments
end Sletionl.
April 29. Six
Communuity
Meetings
were held.
Comments
end Questions
wore received.
Milestone 1 ¯
RTD
Responses
to Public
Comments
end
Questions.
Milestone 3
Draft Interim
Report No. Z
for PC on
Initiel
Rooking of
Cendidete
Alignments.
Daily News.
Miy 8.
Home ̄
Owners
VOW ’No
Eleveted
Real Line on
Wllshire ".
Tue, May
13, 1986, st
RTD Boerd
Room,
Public
Nesting on
the
Draft Interim
Roport No.
;1 fo~ PC on
Operable
Segments
’Anliylll.
TuI~ June
’24.
meetings
lwere held
both in the
ilternoon
end
evening at
W~lehlre
81vd,
Temple to
define end
inelyzl the
operible
segments
for lech
Clndidete
etlgnment .
loiter from
Zev
Yeroelevsky
=eking for
Tue, July 8,
meeting with
LAConservecy
on Historic
Relourcel.
RTD
Responses
to Public
Commentl
end
Ques~one.
Wed, Oct 15,
Chennel 2 le
critical of the
LA Subway.
Dr. Abraham
Fellck,
;heirmen of
the Coalition
Ior Rep d
Tr enlist give
hie reply
regerdlng the
Metro Rail
project.
Oct. 28 ¯ The
lUggeltlOnl
Forum
Contact.
Core Forum
Wed, Nov 6
2 p.m at Mldtown
Hllt~.
questions from
title Core Forum,
Nov 13, Letter
woe lent tO Core
Forum
Participants with
en ettachment
regarding the
Cendldete
Alignments.
Nov 14,
Pub|leaden of
Notice of Intent to
Prepare ¯ GElS In
Locd
Newlpepors. Nov
17, Sr.hedule for
CORE SEIR/S from
Dreft to FineL
Core Forum #2
Wed, Nov 19 at
2 p.m at Mldtown
Hlh~n.
DECEMBERDec 4, Boerd of
Public Works
pc=ted notices.
Dec 5, letter
wee milled tO
Score Forum
Pertlclpente.
Core Forum #3
Tue, De(; 16 it
?.m It
MIdTown
Hilton.
c:\pat:\pub86.xls Page I of 3 PCP - Public Coniul~tioo Plen PC’ - Public Consultation 1/20/94
METRO RED LINE PUBLIC INVOLVMENT IN 1986JANUARY
Club, 600 N.
Olympic/Pico
Corridor:
Angelel High
School Calelezia
4650 W. OIympic
Blvd.
The rllponlel
Io public
FEBRUARY
to public
come=nee
we! clio
)roved=d,
Corridor:
Meellnge wet
held el 12 p.
ind 7 p,m el
Children=
Ho=pilel of
Lie Angelic
4570
Sunlit Blvd.
APRIL
Hollywood
Cotridoz:
Meeting=
weze held el
12:10 p.m end
7:10 p.m el
use Club.
IG41 Ivir Ave,
Wilihire CocHdor:
held el 1Z:10
p.m end 7:10
p,m I| Willhlfl
Blvd. Temple.
In ~HI.
= Ceu~¢ilm~n
iIiII~i
Of A~ignment J. HI
u~ged Ihem to
telephone
¢lmpllgn end
wllll I IIItlr tO
.Mlyol ~rldley, L.~.
MAY
=velue|lon
of four
cendidlte
illgnmenl
being
coneldered
in the CORE
Study.
Mey 13.
Letter from
Certhey
Ci~,¢le
Homeownez=
AIIOC,
reiteretlng
oppoehlon
tO the
end-o|-Ihe.line
$lilJon It
Felrlix end
Wil=hir=.
Tue. Mey 20.
meeting=
were held In
the elternoon
end evening
el
Wilehlr t
Blvd.
other
Io I Feh’lex
line etetion.
AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER
Core Study
Publle Meeting
on Thur, Nov 20
el 12 p.m and 7
p.m il Wllehlre
Blvd. Temple,
Slxford Hell.
Nov 21.
Publ~cetlonl of
Notice of
Prepi~edon of
SEIR on Dally
Newe |VenNuyeL
Chinese
New=.
Frldiy. Nov 21,
Nolle= o| Intent to
Propero m SEIR
were eent to
Indtv|du =b, and
illencleeo
Tue, Nov 2E,
memo Wee lint
to Reviewing
=geneSes
CORE Iludy. $CH#
BBl12S08.
9ECEMBER
I~P - Public Con~ull~do~ Plan PC’ - Public Cuneulca|ion I/~0/94
METRO RED LINE PUBLIC INVOLVMENT[ANIIARY FEBRUARY MARClt APRIL ~,IAY IUNE IULY
City Council Pro=.
Ru=lel end Pre~,
opposition to the
eerisl ptoposll.
Temple to
review (he
Initial
technical
ranking of
the 4
cenditate
~lignmentl.
~UGUST
IN 1986;EPTEMBER OCTOBER ~IOVEMBER DECEMBER
Agencies have
30 days of receipt
of the notice to
Nov 26. Ads 1or
SFIR ware in
Nilehlro Preee.
Hollywood
Ind,pendI~nt..srchmon¢
Chronicle.
Nov 27, Ado for
SEIR was In LA
Sentinel.
1120194¢:\put:\pub86.xls Page 3 of 3 PCP = Public Coa&ult=don Plan PC - Pub~,i¢ Conlul~=don
|
METRO RED LINE PUBLIC INVOLVIVIENT INJANUARY
the NOP.
leller to
;he CORE
Forum
P~rllcipanta
Io come I0
the nell
FEBRUARY
CORE Meeting #4
at 1:30 p.m el
Midlown Hilton
Holel on
February 4. 1987.
Letters from the
Public expressing
their oppoeilion
to the Metro Rail
along Willhir a,
and-el-line
alatlon it
Fair flx-Wilahire,
and Hollywood.
Feb 20. 1987,
$CRTD pelted
eignl on buaee
to notify the
Public about the
Notice o| Compla.
lion of DEEIR and
public hearing.
Sunday, Feb 22,
LA Herald
Examiner and
Daily News
published an ed
for public hearing
on DSEIR.
MARCH
!March 6 and 7.
41,000 Rider
Bulletina were
distributed on all
bus lanai about
the hearing on
DSEIR.
Acknowledgement
Item the Stale
ClaeHng House
thai DSEIR wee
Agancias for
review from Feb
25, 1987 to April 1C
1987
Public Hearing it
10 a.m el RTD on
March 14. 1987 to
conaider comments
on DSEIR.
March 18. 1987,
Comments ind
Responses from
the Public hearing
oh DSEIR.
L~,.ttora from the
Public on DSEIR.
APRIL
More Public
responlel on
DSEIR.
April 6. 1987.
PAC adoplld
Candidale
Alignmanl //4 by
majority VOte.
April 10. 1987,
the Still
Claaringhouae
returned
commentl on
DSEIR Item
aganlcas.
April 22. 1987.
City of LA
Planning Dept.
responded to
quoaflone end
commentl on
DSEIR.
April 23. 1987.
KNX ICBS Radiol,
KTLA. FOX TV on
behalf of KTTV.
KMPC ind KUTE
opposed to
bulilding Metro
IMAY
More Public
Commentl
JUNE
More Public
Commante
and
Responses;
and replies
from RTD.
Ottil
Handricks
WJJ I| the
Hollywood
Mobility
Action
Commillee
Meeting
that
held in June
3, 1987 at I
im at Rm
1200. City
Hill
tO d|iCUll
Metro Rill
alignments
through
HollywOod.
JULY
July 13, 1987, =
tO State Sac. Of
Resources In
regard to "Notice
of Intent to
;Prepare a
EEIS on
Alternative
Alignments.
Wrlltan -
comments .were
received during
= 30-day
comment period
which closed on
Auguat 17, 1987.
Legal Ad ¯Nodce
of Inlanl to
Prepare SEIS:
July 16. 1987 -
Publication dale
in the LA Times,
July 17. 1887 -
Publication date
in the Dally Nawa
July 18, 1987 ¯
Publication data
in the Chinese
Dally News. LA
AUGUST
Aug. 10- 12, 1987
commenta wire
received from CBS,
KTLA, FOX TV.
Golden West
8roidcaltlrl ind
Eunllt Blvd Coalition
on eElS expressing
their oppoalliona to
Metro Rill along
Eunaal Blvd.
More Public
:ommlntl on
SEI8,Thur.. Aug. 27. 1987.
Public Hearing on the
Adoption of a
NagltJve Dacllration
for the rallignment
of a segment of
MOB.1.
Aug. 11, 1987, Ottie
Hendrlcks attended
the Hollywood Action
CommJtae Melting
hal was held at
Yameshbo
Reaturenl, 1989 N,
lycimoce Ave.,
Hollywood et 10 am
1987SEPTEMBER
Sept 8, 1987.
letter was
received from
CBS urging
UMTA and RTD
to re-measure
the impact of
noise in
itudios under
broadcasting
conditlona il
their earlier
wore not valid.
OCTOBER
Roaponao
tO a letter
from a
student
regarding
the Metro
Rail
Project
Independent
Technical
Review
Plnll #1
Meeting
waa held
on Thur.
Oct. 8,
1987. at
9:15 am at
Rm 305.
City Hall.
The purpoaa
was to
diacuaa the
Impact of
Nolle,
Vibration ind
Electro -
magnatlo
Intarlarance
on Studios.
NOVEMBER
Independent
Technical Review
Penal #3 Meeting wee
held on Thur. Nov. 5,
1987. at 9 sm at
Holiday Inn, 1755 N.
Hlglend Avenue,
Hollywood. The
purpose was to
:discuss the Noise,
Vibration,
magnetic ieluas Ind
conduelona drlwn
|rein analysis.
Dra|t SEIR/SEIS end
1983 FEIS were
IVllieble effective
Nov. 17. 1987 end
written comments
were received
until Jan 2. 1988.
Legal AD - Notice
of Avellebilty of
Draft EEI$/SEIR &
Public Hearing;
Nov 17, 1987.
Publicetlondete in
Herald Examiner
J~y18,1987-
Publicidondate in
DECEMBER
Dec 17, 1987,
Comment
Period for the
Draft SEIS/SEIR
from Jan 2,
1988 to Jan 27
1988 in order to
time |or the
Public to
this complex
undertaking
Public Haidng
on Drelt
SEISISEIR at 10
e.m. on Dec 18.
1987 et RTD
|oard Room
and minute==
lot the
meeting WaS
rrovlded,
e:\pat:\pub87.xls Page I of 2 1/20194
METRO RED LINE PUBLIC INVOLVMENT IN 1987JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH’ APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGusT SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER
Wed. F=b 25. LA
Opinion publi=had
en ed lot public
hearing on DSEIR.
Thur. feb 26. LA
Senllnel end
Eaetside Sun
)ublilhed
an ed for public
hearing on DSEIR.
Friday. Feb 27,
Beverly Hille
Courier
lubli=hed
en ed for public
hearing on DSEIR,
Coplee o| the
DSEIR were
= veil=hie effective
Feb. 20. 1987 at
RTD. LA Publ;c
Libr =flee and
Major
Unlv=,rsitiSl
Libraries.
received until
IApril 7. 1987.
March 23, 1987.
Project Are=
Committee (PACi
Hollywood Redev-
elopmenl Project
met to discuss
: the "P osition
Statement lot
Alignment
Prelsrence thru
~Hollywood’.
Blvd. se h will
hOleS end =ound
vibretlone.
Opinion, Rafu
Shlmpo. and the
Korean Times.
July 22, 1987 ¯
Public=elan data’
in th=, Meredith
N=,wspapers:
Hollywood
independent,
Wesllske Poll,
Wilehirs Indepe-
ndent, Wilehl.fe
Prise and t
Central Newl
Wave-Southwest
Iweva.
=,nd girl them a
good overview ol the
Metro Rail Alignment
in Hollywood
=,llo =.bout the public
participation.April 24. 1987,
the 8CRTD Board
of Director, ,
adopted
Cendidels
Alignment #4 =e
the Locally
Proferred
Alternative ILPAI
April 30. 1987,
the SCRTD Bo=rd
adopted e
Subsequent
emonded
’July 23, 1987 -
,Publication dale
in the Sentinel.
More Public
SEI$,
Aug. 31. 1987.
Wilton, Ihrig &
Alao~ella
rA~ouellcel
ConeullentsJ
gave $CRTD
Ih=,lr r=,port
that we=, done
on the Noisa
CB~ Studio on
Aug. 18. 1988.
Independent
Technical
Reviaw Psnsl
#2 Meeting
was, held on
Wad, Oct. 21,
1987 it 7:30
am Rm 305,
City Hall. The
purpose Wll
tO diecusa the
Assess- mane
o! Noise Ind
Vibration
along Suns,el.
LA Tim=e, ~
Opinion (Spinach),
Refu Shlmpo
IEngliah],
Arm=,nlin Paper
July 19, 1987 ¯
Publi¢idon dale in
Eastern Group
Publications.
Certifies,to of
Trinamiasion/
Delivery of Draft
srdSlSEIR to the
Pub=is,
Nantes of Public
agencies, end
officlele;
bueir~eseas,
Cocpocetlone end
Civio
OrgonJzeUona; and
Private C~en~
who provided
teiUm~y ~
written eommenta
on the Drift
SFJS/SEIR.
¢:\pai:\pub87.xls Pag¢ 2 of 2 I/20/9 4
METRO RED LINE PUBLIC INVOLVMENT INFEBRUARY MARCH APRIL
Fsb, 1988 April 20, Addlndum to
an article 1988. thirl Drift SEI$1SEIR
in the wel I Well Ivllllble
Metro ricommsn, effective Miy 20,
News dillon for 1988 lnd written
8ullslin the Bolrd comments were
1iliad " Io rscslved until July
CORE "Consider 7. 1988
Study Modificltion Sit., Mly 21. 1988
Nears to CORE an Ad for
Comple- ;Study Notice of
lion’. Thl Candidate Avlilabllity of
article said Alignment Addendum to thl
Ihet Public 6" Drift SEIS/SEIR Ind
Input helps IPublio Hiiring
shape wls publishld in
Metro Rail the Herild
route Examiner.
beyond Sun., Mly 22. 1988
first WaS the
segment. Publication dell in
the LA Times.
Thur., May 2.6 1988
wls the
Publicition date in
the Chinese Dlily
News.
Miy 23, 1888. thor
JANUARY
Jan 28, 1988,
the Board
of Candidate
Alignment 6
along with
the other five
candidate
allgnmsntl in
the CORE
Study Draft
ISEISISEIR) to
(hi Sunlit
Bird
MAY JUNE JULY
Thur., June 9, 1988, Mike Woo end
Nile Holden released e report which
tilled for en underground Metro Rill
Alignment due to the high colt of
icquiring lind needed for lerlal
stitlons ind rilocltlon of residents
and busJnislll.
June 14. 1988. acknowledgement
from the Stile Clearing House thor
the Addendum to the Drift SEISlSEIR
wls sent 1o Stele Agencies for
irevlew from May 5, 1987 to July
1987.
Thur.. Juno 16, 1988, the Planning
Commiislon approved and
recommended thlt the City Council
adopts Modified Alignment I.
Public Hearing on Addendum to the
DrMt $EISISEIR at 10 e.m. on Tul.,
June 21, 1988 it RTD Board Room.
Minutil end sign up sheet fo~ the
misting was providld.
The purpose of this addendum to the
Drift SEISlSEIR wal to prolon¢ the
technical characterlsticl end
environmental Impacts of CA 6. It
lllo mltlgitll the potintlll
Invlromentsl Impacts of the
Segment of CA 4. blw Vermont/8into
Mon~ce 8laden and
More.Public
rllp0nlll on the
Add;ndum to the
Draft SEIS/SEIR.
July 13. 1988, Susinne
B. Gifford IGinerll
CounlelJ isked for in
advice from Bird,
Mirelil, Boxer,
Wolpert end Mitz on
how tO proceed with
the Final SEIS/SEIR
which will contain in
LPA (CA1-MI that wls
not specifically
Included In the Draft
documents but was
composed from
elements of Other
lJtlrnltlVll thlt werl
fully diloulsld in the
Drift documents.
July 14, 1988, the
SCRTD Bolrd of
Dlrecto~l adopted
Candidate AlJgnmant
1-Modified (CALM| as
the revised LPA.
1988AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER
METRO RED LINE PUBLIC INVOLVMENT INJANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH [APRIL MAY JUNE JULY
ifor the Board to
"Consider
Selection of the
LPA and IncludMg
Segment 2 in
reference of
Addendum to the
Draft SEISISEIR. It
Is recommended
thee the Board
adopt e 17,6 mile.
ell-subway line.
with 15 stations.
including the five
etstlone along
MOS-1.
May 31. 1989. lares
hem the Bunter
Blvd. Coalition
requemting s 30
minute
preesntetlon Ior 7
lplaklrl It the
June 2let hasting.
lUni,ver=.sl CityTu*.. June 21, 1988, following the
=Public Hearing. the City Planning
Commission unanimously sdopted
Modified Alignment 1.
The LACTC was informed to make
their recommendation on S levlead
LPA to 8CRTD Board by July 14, 1998.
The 8CRTO Board of Directors will
select an LPA end Including Segment
2 ind full funding contract for theascend phase o| Metro Rail will be
exacuted blw the SCRTD ind the
Fadarsl Oovernmen! blf Octobsr I.
1988.
June 24, 1988, there was =
recommendation for the Bosrd to
"Consider 8alectlon of the LPA and
Including Segment 2 lot the CORE
Study Flnsl 8EISlSEIR’. It I=
recommended that the Bolrd select
CORE Study Candidate Alignment 1 -
Modified ICA1M) es the new LPA
wld¢~ I= a 17.’/ndie, all Subway lens,
hss 18 etstiona0 Including the five
etstiona ==long MOS.1 Inltisl segment.
Signed petitions end more letters
from the publio in levee of oil subway
route through Hollywood Blvd.
1988AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER
e:\pat\pub88.xls Page 2 of 2 1/20/94
ATTACHMENT 2
The CORE Forum membership is as follows:
Mr. David AbelDavid Abel & Associates
Ms. Caroline AhmansonBeverly-Wilshire Hotel
The Honorable Richard AlatorreCouncilmember0 City of Los Angeles
Mr. George AllenWilshire Chamber of Commerce
The Honorable Michael AntonovichBoard of Supervisors, County of Los Angeles
Mr. Richard AtkinsHollywood Heritage
The Honorable Jacki BacharachCouneilmember, City of Rancho Palos Verdes
Steven BangsHollywood Heights Association
Mr. Joel BakerCentury City Chamber of Commerce
Mr. Neil BarryMid-City Chamber of Commerce
Ms. Rita BarschakLeague of Women Voters
The Honorable Anthony BeilensonU.S. Congress
The Honorable Howard BermanU.S. Congress
The Honorable Ernani BernardiCouncilmember, City of Los Angeles
The Honorable Hal BernsonCouncilmember, City of Los Angeles
The Honorable Tom BradleyMayor, City of Los Angele~
The Honorable Marvin Braude
Councilmember, City of Los Angeles
Mr. Loren BrownS~les/Marketing, Los Angeles Midtown Hilton
Mr. William CallenderCalfed, Inc.
Mr. Marshall CaskeyMarshall Caskey, Attorney
Mr. Kenneth K. ChangDelta Partnership Pacific Ltd.
Ms. Sandi ChesterHollywood Presbyterian Medical Center
Mr. William ChristopherMiracle Mile Residential Association
Mr. Nathan L. ChromanTransportation Commissioner, City of Los Angeles
Ms. LynMacewen CohenMiracle Mile Residential Association
Ms. Gwen ColemanLos Angeles Urban League
Mr. Keith ComrieChief Administrative Officer, City of. Los Angeles.
Ms. Karen ConstineKaiser Permanente Contrex Building
Mr. Rot CoxWilshire Center Community Involvement Association
The Honorable Deane DanaBoard of Supervisors, County of Los Angeles
Ms. Anne Del ValleNorth Hollywood Project Area Committee
The Honorable Julian DixonU.S. Congress
Mr. John DyerSCRTD
The Honorable Edmund D. EdelmanBoard of Supervisors, County of Los Angeles
Mr. Geoffrey ElyBuilding Owners and Managers Association
The Honorable Robert Farrell
Councilmember, City of Los Angeles
The Honorable John Ferraro
Councilmember, City of Los Angeles
Commissioner Betty FisherLos Angeles County Regional Planning Commission
The Honorable Joan Milke Flores
Councilmember, City of Los Angeles
Mr. Frank Foster
Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles
Mr. Paul D. Freedman
Beverly-Fairfax Chamber of Commerce
Mr. Daniel P. GarciaLos Angeles Planning Commission
Mr. Steve D. Gavin
Greater Los Angeles Transportation Commission
Ms. Barbara Goen
KCET-TV
Mr. Richard Goette
Oxford Square Homeowners Association
The Honorable Kenneth Hahn
Board of Supervisors, County of Los Angeles
Mr Mark Hall
Archiplan
Mr. James Hankla
Chief Administrative Officer, County of Los Angeles
Mr. Stanley Hart
Sierra Club
Mr. Anthony Hays
Boulevard Heights Homeowners Association
Mr Henry Hilty
A.F. Gilmore Co.
Mr Donald Howery
General Manager, Los Angeles Department of Transportation
Mr. Jon JerdeJerde Partnership
Mr. Arland JohnsonHollywood Business Community
Mr.. Raymond JohnsonNAACP
Mr. Harold KatzLos Angeles West Chamber of Commerce
The Honorable Richard KatzAssemblyman, California State Assembly
Ms. Lydia KennardKDG Development
Mr. Ted KltosDeputy to Mayor of West Hollywood (S. Schulte)
Mr. James J. KrochkaAttorney, Trust Services of America, Inc.
Ms. Ruth Ann LehrerLoS Angeles Conservancy
The Honorable Gilbert W. LindsayCouncil~ember, City of Los Angeles
Mr. Norris D. LineweaverHollywood Project A/ea Committee, Los Angeles ,Cq=s~..unity RedevelopmentAgency ....
Mr. Allan LowyAllan N. Lowy, Attorney
Mr. Nicholas LuceroLos Angeles Boys and Girls Club
Mr. Michael HalakVariety Magazine
Ms. Nlna MaloneLos Angeles City College
The Honorable Burr MargollnAssemblyman, California State Assembly
Mr. Carl MasuonCarl Maston, Architect
Mr. Bud MarhisBuilding and Construction Trades Council
Ms. ChrlstyJohnson McAvoyHollywood Heritage
4
Mr. Jack McCarleyPublic Relations, Bullocks Department Store
Mr. William R. McCarleyCh°ief Legislative Analyst, City of Los Angeles
Mr. Bill McGregorTooley Company
Ms. Marsha MednickVan Nuys Chamber of Commerce
Mr. Kurt MeyerKurt Meyer Partners, Inc.
Mr. Brian MooreHillside Federation
Mr. Hugo MorrisTeamsters Union Joint Council, ~2
Mr. Winston V. MorrowTICOR
Mr. Norman MurdockDirector, Los Angeles Department of Regional Planning
Mr. Dale NealLatham-Watkins
Mr. Thomas NelsonConsulting Engineer
Mr. Jerry M. NemiroBullocks Wilshire
Mr. William NerenbergAlia Management
Mr. Robert NorvetCBS, Inc,
M~. Jim OrtnerSouthern California Automobile Association
Mr. Doyle PeckBraille Institute
Dr. James PeoplesLos Angeles County Museum of Art
Ms. Betty PetersUnited States Borax and Chemical Corporation
The Honorable Joy Picus
Councilmember, City of Los Angeles
Mr. Mark PisanoSouthern California Association of Governments
Ms. Diana PlotkinBeverly Wilshire Homeowners Association
Mr. Manning Post ICentral Business DiStrict Redevelopment Project Citizen AdvisoryCommission.
Mr. Wayne RatkovitchRatkovitch, Bowers, Inc.
Mr. Ray RemyPresident, Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce
Mr. Rick RichmondExecutive Director, Los Angeles County TransportationCommission
The Honorable Alan RobbinsSenator, California State Senate
The Honorable David RobertiPresident Pro Tempore, Cal.ifornia State Senate
Mr. William RobertsonAFL-CIO
The Honorable Mike RoosAssemblyman, California State Assembly
The Honorable Herschel RosenthalSenator, California State Senate
Mr. Charles RosinCarthay Circle Homeowners Association
Mr. Alan RossTimes Mirror Inc.
Mr. Kenneth C. RossChildrenes Hospital of Los Angeles
The Honorable Edward RoybalU.S. Congress
Mr. Gary RussellThe Stakeholders
The Honorable Pat RussellCouncilmember, City of LOs Angeles
Mr. George P. Rutland
California Federal Savings and Loan Association
Ms. Lois SaffianLeague of Wome~oters
The Honorable Peter F. Schabarum
Board of Supervisors, County of Los Angeles ¯
Mr. Phillip SehiliroAide to Representative Waxman
The Honorable Stephen Schulte
Mayor, City of West Hollywood
Ms. Debra Serdutz
ScientologyMissions International
Mr. John Shirey
Assistant Chief Administrative Officer, County of Los Angeles
Mr. Alan Sieroty
Wilshire Boulevard Property Owner’s Coalition
Mr. Dan Silverman
Federation, CRC
Mr. Owen Smith
Sounh Brookside Homeowners Association
Mr. Bill Snyder
The Greater LOs Angeles Press~Club
The Honorable Charlotte Spadaro
Mayor, City of Beverly Hills
Mr. Chris Stewart
Central City Association
Mr. Henry Sulzberger
May Company California
Ms. Georgette Todd
Hollywood Library
Mr. Ken Topping
Los Angeles Department of Planning
M~. Betty Trotter
League of Women Voters
Mr. John Tuite
Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Association
The Honorable Joel Wachs~
7
Councilmember, City of Los Angeles
The Honorable Diane Watson
Senator, California State Senate
The Honorable Henry Waxman
U.S. Congress
Mr. Gerald Weisstein
Bank of Los Angeles
Mr. John H. Welborne
Adams Dugue & Hazeltine, Attorneys
Mr. Bill Welsh
Hollywood Chamber of Commerce
Mr. Steve WilsonFremont Place Homeowners Association
Ms. Kathy Wong
Beverly-Fairfax Chamber of Commerce
The Honorable Michael WooCou~cilmember, City of Los Angeles
Mr. Richard WorkmanWindsor Village Association
The Honorable Zev Yaroslavsky
Councilmember, City of LOs Angeles
Mr. Charles E. Young
Chancellor, UCLA
8