![Page 1: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM
Peter P. WakkerMDM, October 24, Pittsburgh
lecture forcareer achievement award
Topic: mutual benefits of interactions between economics & MDM;David Meltzer on Monday: "lack of economists in MDM."
![Page 2: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2Outline1. Background history on MDM;2. Background history on Me (Economist) before
1992;
3. Three Surprises Awaiting Me when I Entered MDM in 1992;
4. Three Lessons Learnt from the Surprises.
Last lesson will generate speculations on future directions for MDM Economics
![Page 3: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
1. Background History on MDM
MDM took off around 1980:
McNeil, Barbara J., Ralph Weichselbaum, & Stephen G. Pauker (1978), “Fallacy of the Five-Year Survival in Lung Cancer,”The New England Journal of Medicine 299,13971401.
![Page 4: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Based on ideas of economics (equated with decision theory here) of the 1980s (Keeney & Raiffa 1976),including:
expected utility!
(cf. HUI).
In MDM community I still find the ideas of economics of the 1980s.
Economics has changed since.
4
![Page 5: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Typical of approach of MDM:take ideas from economics aspractical tools, "machines,"
without much awareness of background theory.
MDM'ers just try things out.
I call this the black-box approach.
(First explained to me by Lia Verhoef in a conversation of 18 years ago.)
5
![Page 6: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
I worked on prospect theory (Schmeidler 1989; Tversky & Kahneman 1992).Generalizes expected utility.
U : , W : 2S [0,1], s.t.(E1:x1, …, En:xn)
i=1n (W(E(i)…E(i)) – W(E(i)…E(i–1)))U(x(i))
(with a permutation such that x(1) … x(n))
represents preferences.
6
2. My Background before 1992
In maths and economics.
![Page 7: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
I did read
Weinstein, Fineberg, Elstein, et al. (1980). “Clinical Decision Analysis.” Saunders, Philadelphia.
This book brought me in this field.
I started in MDM in 1992, at LUMC (Leiden University Medical Center; director: Job Kievit).
7
![Page 8: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
3. Three Surprises Awaiting Me in 1992
![Page 9: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Surprise 1: on TTO (Time TradeOff)
10 yr blind ~ 9 yr perfect healththenquality of being blind = 9/10.
I: ????
What about utility of life duration????Nonlinear????
![Page 10: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Any serious theory and some algebra:Q(blind) = U(9yr)/U(10yr).
1st theoretical problem of TTO: Can't just drop U??
Maybe you say "we don't know U"? Then take best guess! SayU(y yr) = e–0.03y (3% discounting).Surely better than linear! Linear U always underestimates Q(blind)!?
My colleague Anne Stiggelbout of LUMC worked on utility correction for TTO in 1992.
10
![Page 11: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
My expectation in 1992:
Explain to MDM once. "Hey there, you forgot utility."
11
MDM'ers will immediately correct mistake and from there on do TTO right (with utility incorporated) for the rest of their lives.
Surprise: MDM'ers did not change!?!?
I could not believe in 1992.
(2nd theoretical problem: Uintertemporal risky Uand Uinterpersonal-welfare)
![Page 12: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
3rd theoretical problem for TTO:SG is much better theoretically.If
12
then (under expected utility)U(blind) = 0.90.
("SG is gold standard.")
blind ~
90% perfect health
10% †
![Page 13: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Despite all these theoretical problems of TTO, MDM just went on, and goes on, to use TTO.
Has to do with MDM's black-box approach. More on that later.
13
![Page 14: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Surprise 2: on HYE (Healthy Years Equivalent)
TTO but with risk involved (don't read algebra):
14
Authors claimed they got something new in theory. However, in theory (by "transitivity"), just get TTO data.In theory just very roundabout TTO???
90% 10 yr per-fect health
10% †Stage 1: 10 yr blind ~
then HYE (10 yr blind) = 9 yr.
Stage 2:90% 10 yr per-
fect health
10% †~ 9 yr perfect health
![Page 15: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Theoretically right or wrong: MDM doesn't care. MDM used HYE and tested it empirically.???
Testing whether 2 + 2 = 5 ???
To be rejected immediately!
Has to do again with MDM's black-box approach. More on that later.
15
![Page 16: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Surprise 3: on risky versus riskless utility. Economists: There must be more to risk attitude than "riskless" utility.
[Risky utility riskless utility](I skip theory.)Still common thinking in MDM today.
![Page 17: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
"Risky utility riskless utility"obsolete in modern economics.
Reason: Prospect theory."There must be more to risk attitude than riskless utility"
now accommodated through
probability weighting; loss aversion.
These concepts are more valuable than distinction risky riskless utility. So, distinction obsolete in economics today.
![Page 18: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Explanation: MDM took ideas from economics in 1980s.
There have been many studies using prospect theory in MDM, to my joy. But it is not yet part of the common thinking on risk attitude.
18
![Page 19: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
4. Lessons Learnt from the Surprises
Economists look at machines from the inside,MDM'ers from the outside. Both have pros and cons and can benefit from each other.
![Page 20: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Lesson 1: About TTO.After 1990:Economics moved closer to empirical reality: Prospect theory.Nobel-prize in economics in 2002.
20
![Page 21: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
For SG:all deviations from expected utility generate overestimations; all in same direction.So enormous, dramatic, overestimations there.
For TTO:Deviations neutralize each other.So, not so bad.
Bleichrodt, Han (2002), “A New Explanation for the Difference between SG and TTO Utilities,” Health Economics 11, 447456.
21
![Page 22: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Conclusion: TTO is better.
MDM community was right after all!
Black-box approach worked better, and I started respecting it.
Took me several years to come to understand this.
22
![Page 23: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Lesson 2: About HYE.
Similar experience, though opposite ending.Reality theory might still save HYE?
Not here.
Prospect theory: HYE is even worse than SG.
23
![Page 24: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
My conclusion for HEY:When HYE could survive for several years in MDM, MDM could have benefited from more economists!Here black-box approach led to a waste of human resources.
24
![Page 25: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Lesson 3: About risky versus riskless utility.
Prospect theory gives better views on descriptive risk attitude. Components of risk attitude (repeating):
utility; probabilistic risk aversion (probability weighting); loss aversion; framing.
25
![Page 26: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
MDM can benefit from ideas developed in economics after 1990.
Economics/prospect theory will also benefit much from "black-box" thinking of MDM.
Dream for future of QALY: get version of SG that is better than TTO.Leaving risk/utility out as done in TTO cannot be. In long run TTO cannot be ultimate measurement machine.(Here positive inputs from HYE are felt!)
Socio-academic lesson: these things take time …
26
Generations?
![Page 27: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
The End
27
![Page 28: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Except that …
28
![Page 29: Lessons Learned by (from?) an Economist Working in MDM](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568158b8550346895dc60169/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Proposal:All lectures in MDM are good.Hence, no need to praise every lecture at every question again.Instruct chairmen to discourage praising of lectures.
29