-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
1/44
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTCENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
HONORABLE ANDREW J . GUILFORD, JUDGE PRESIDING; COURTROOM 100
CERTIFIED TRANSCRIPTCHARLES EDWARD LINCOLN I I I ,
P l a i n t i f f ( s ) ,
v s . No. SACV 10-1573-AG(PLAx)
DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL INFORMATIONSYSTEMS INC., ET AL
Defendant(s) .
REPORTER'S DAILY TRANSCRIPT OF PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGSSANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 2011
DENISE PADDOCKCSR 10199, CMRS, RMR, CRRt r ansc r ip t s@ocrecord . com
U.S. DISTRICT COURT REPORTER
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
2/44
A P P EA RAN C E S022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLNSACV 10 -1573 -AG(PLAx )
IN BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF:
IN BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT:
Phi l ip J BergLaw Off i ces o f Phi l ip J Berg555 Andorra Glen Cour t , Su i t e 12Lafaye t t e Hi l l , PA 19444-2531610-825-3134Fax: 610-834-7659Email : phi l jberg@gmai l .com
Orly Taitz:Law Off i ces o f Dr. Orly Ta i t z26302 La Paz, Sui te 211Miss ion Vie jo , CA 92691949-683-5411Email : dr t a i t z@yahoo .comWill iam C HaggertyFord, Walker , Hagger ty & Behar1 World Trade Ct r , 27th FloorLong Beach, CA 90831-2700562-983-2500Email : bi l [email protected] A RossBradley and Gmelich700 N Brand Blvd, 10th FloorGlendale , CA 91203-1202818-243-5200Fax: 818-243-5266Email : j ross@bglawyers .com
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
3/44
1234
09:49 56789
09:49 1011121314
09:49 1516171819
09502021222324
095025
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA; MONDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 2011THE CLERK: I tem 7, SACV 10-1573-AG(PLAx):
Char les Edward Lincoln , I I I v Dayl igh t Chemical In format ionSystems, In c . , e t a l .
MR. ROSS: Good morning, Your Honor.Jonathan Ross on b eh a l f o f Defendants Yosef Tai tz
and Dayl igh t Chemical In format ion Systems.MR. BERG: Phi l ip Berg on b e h a l f of the P l a i n t i f f ,
Char les L inco ln , s u b j e c t t o the ru l ing on my pro hac v i c e ,Your Honor.
MR. HAGGERTY: Will iam Hagger ty , Your Honor,s u b s t i t u t i n g in on b e h a l f of Lewis Br i sbo i s fo r Orly T ai t zand the Law Of f i c e s o f Orly T a i t z .
I apolog ize to th e c o u r t . The s u b s t i t u t i o n wase l ec t r o n i ca l l y f i l ed bu t no t f i l ed d i r e c t l y here wi th t h i sdepar tment , so I d o n ' t th ink t h a t you have th e s igneds u b s t i t u t i o n .
THE CLERK: We're j u s t wai t ing fo r th e e-mai lc op i e s , Judge.h is o f f i c e .
He was going to send it when he go t back to
THE COURT: A ll r i g h t .to address today .
We have a couple o f i tems
I would l i k e to address the pending p e t i t i o n fo rpro hac vice admiss ion .
I a l so want to engage in our normal schedul ing
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
4/44
1234
09:50 56789
0950 1011121314
0951 1516171819
0951 2021222324
0951 25
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)
confe rence where we s e t a trial da te and make those kinds o fd e te rmin a t io n s .
An d before I do t h a t , I would l i ke to ask what i sth e l i k e l ih o o d t h a t t h i s w i l l cont inue to be a f ed e ra lac t ion?
Mr. Berg, t h e re was a motion to dismiss brough t
2
ag a in s t your RICO c la ims . I gran ted t h a t mot ion , but g ran tedleave to amend. I f - - if t h i s i s in f ed e ra l co u r t , onlybased on t h a t RICO c la im, it i s in f ed e ra l co u r t by a veryt h in t h read .
When I asked you about t h i s th e l a s t t ime you werehere , I must say I was very puzz led when you sa id t h e re was amal ic ious pr ose c u t i on cla im, which I th ink would have noth ingto do with f ed e ra l j u r i s d i c t i o n .
MR. BERG: You ' re r i g h t and I apolog ize ,Your Honor.
THE COURT: So what i s th e l i k e l i h o o d t h a t t h i sw i l l remain in my cour t?
MR. BERG: I f th e RICO cla im - - we have to f i l e anamended compla in t . We have two more weeks to do t h a t ,Your Honor, and I an t i c ipa te a motion to di smiss a f t e r t h a t .
I f the RICO cla im i s o u t , then we still have a casehere - - and I wasn ' t up on it l a s t t ime - - based ond iv e r s i t y , Your Honor.
Char les Lincoln r e s i d e s in Texas and th e o t h e r
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
5/44
1234
09:51 56789
0952 1011121314
0952 1516171819
09522021222324
095225
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)
ac t io n s a re here i n Ca l i fo rn i a , so we would have d i v e r s i t yj u r i s d i c t i o n .
THE COURT: Any response from the defense aboutd iv e r s i t y j u r i s d i c t i o n ?
And to be hones t , l e t me say t h i s . I 'm going frommemory now, Mr. Berg, so I could be wrong. I d o n ' t th inkyour o r i g i n a l complaint a l l eg ed d iv e r s i t y . I th ink thedefense an t i c ipa ted a d i v e r s i t y cla im and kind of t a lk edabout it, even though it wasn ' t c l ea r ly s e t fo r th in yourcompla in t .
Your f a i l u r e to s e t it fo r th made me th ink t h a t wew e r e n ' t fac ing d i v e r s i t y i s s u e s .
Yes.MS. TAITZ: I d i d n ' t have a chance to i n t roduce
myself , and I 'm Orly T ai t z and I 'm r ep resen t in gAppeal ing Den t i s t ry .
3
I would l i k e to s t a t e t h a t d i v e r s i ty was no t in th ecompla in t ; it was not in the f i r s t amended complaint e i t h e r .And it came about j u s t now and I have a l ready p resen ted t h i sco u r t with evidence t h a t Mr. Lincoln ran fo r o f f i c e here inth e St a t e of Cal i fo rn i a l a s t year when he f i l ed h iscompla in t .
In or de r to run fo r o f f i ce , he had to f i l e a - - th edocument ' s showing h e ' s the permanent r e s i d en t of C a l i f o r n i a .
Ad d i t io n a l ly , he f i l ed numerous l eg a l ac t io n s as a
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
6/44
1234
09:53 56789
0953 1011121314
0953 1516171819
09532021222324
095425
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)4
r e s i d e n t of C a l i f o r n i a .Thi rd , Mr. Linco ln was sanc t ioned n e a r l y a q u a r t e r
o f a mi l l i o n d o l l a r s in the s t a t e o f Texas . 150,000THE COURT: What does t h a t have to do with
d i v e r s i t y ?MS. TAITZ: His main occupa t ion i s f i l i n g t h i s type
o f l a w s u i t s . He was preventedTHE COURT: My under s tand ing o f d i v e r s i t y y o u ' r e
not f i t t i n g i n t o .
moment.
o f Texas .
MS. TAITZ: I f I - - if I can g e t leeway o f j u s t a
He i s no t a l lowed to f i l e any l a wsu i t s in th e s t a t eHis main occupa t ion i s f i l i n g l a w s u i t s , so he has
no jo b in th e s t a t e o f Texas ; he has no bus iness in th e s t a t eo f Texas . He i s not a l lowed to f i l e h is - - h is - - h is on lyoccupa t ion i s f i l i n g t he se type of f r i v o lo u s l awsu i t s . Hewas prevented
THE COURT: I gave you some leeway he r e . You ' restill not t a l k i n g d i v e r s i t y to me. You ' re t a l k i n g a l l s o r t so f o th e r t h i n g s , but t h a t l a s t little b i t o f in format ionisn't he lp ing me in a d i v e r s i t y an a l y s i s .
MS. TAITZ: For d i v e r s i t y he needs to be r e s i d e n to f th e s t a t e o f Texas . He needs to re s id e t h e re .
THE COURT: I under s tand and noth ing t h a t you sa idprovided any evidence to me a t a l l t h a t he w a s n ' t l i v i n g in
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
7/44
1234
09:54 56789
0954 1011121314
0954 1516171819
09542021222324
095525
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)5
Texas - - or res id ing in Texas.MS. TAITZ: His own complaint shows - -THE COURT: Now you ' re back to something t h a t ' s
r e l ev an t . The f i r s t i s su es were r e l ev an t when you weresay ing t h a t h is complaint says t h i s , bu t when you went o f f ont h a t sanct ion de a l you l o s t me on d iv e r s i t y .
Le t ' s t r y and focus he r e .MS. TAITZ: A ll I t r i e d to s t a t e i s t h a t he has no
occupa t ion in the s t a t e o f Texas because he i s not al lowed towork t he re . His only occupa t ion i s f i l i n g l aw su i t s . He wast o ld he i s not al lowed to f i l e in the s t a t e o f Texas, f ed e ra lo r s t a t e co u r t .
THE COURT: I unders t and .MS. TAITZ: But a l so , accord ing to h is compla in t ,
he has been r e s i d i n g i n Ca l i fo rn i a dur ing t h i s year .THE COURT: Okay. You sa id t h a t a t th e beginn ing
and I go t t h a t . That w i l l be very r e l ev an t to a d i v e r s i t yan a l y s i s .
So, Mr. Berg, you ' re going - - someone w i l l bef i l i n g a compla in t , an amended compla in t , and we w i l l look a tth e j u r i s d i c t i o n i s su e f i r s t . F i r s t w e ' l l look a t whetherRICO i s going to surv ive a second motion to d i sm i s s ; and, indoing t h a t , p lease under s tand two b ig cases
MR. BERG: I do under s tand them now.THE COURT: - - Iqbal/Twombly. I f you Google them
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
8/44
1234
09:55 56789
0955 1011121314
0955 1516171819
09562021222324
095625
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)
you w i l l get t ens of thousands o f h i t s and t h a t ' s a l l t h a td i s t r i c t cour t s a re paying a t t e n t i o n to these days .
6
MR. BERG: Your Honor, I d id t h a t as soon as I l e f there l a s t t ime and I apolog ize .
THE COURT: W e ' l l check and see if RICO stillsurv ives and if it d o e s n ' t on th e d i v e r s i t y i s su e , w e ' l l thenhave to look a t th e d i v e r s i t y i s su e .
You've got ten a preview o f some of the th ings wemight hear on th e d iv e r s i t y i s su e .
That ' s no t before me now. I was j u s t th ink ingmaybe we would g e t some ea r ly de te rmina t ion t h a t you weregoing to s t a t e co u r t , which i s a very good co u r t ac ross th es t r e e t .
This co u r t i s very pro tec t ive o f f e d e r a lj u r i s d i c t i o n . The law r eq u i re s t h a t I be pro tec t ive o ffed e ra l j u r i s d i c t i o n .
From a f e d e r a l i s t p o in t o f view the law r eq u i re st h a t I al low s t a t e cour t s to make ru l i n g s i n mat te r s wheres t a t e co u r t s have t r a d i t i o n a l l y made ru l i n g s .
So t hose w i l l a l l be thoughts t h a t I have in mind.Okay.
ap p l i ca t i o n .Now let's t u rn t o the pro hac vice
Mr. Berg, you have f i l ed a l e t t e r on February 24th ,2011.
You ' re aware o f t h a t l e t t e r ?
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
9/44
1234
09:56 56789
0956 1011121314
0957 1516171819
09572021222324
095725
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)7
MR. BERG: Yes, Your Honor.THE COURT: A ll r i g h t . I - - I th ink t h a t l e t t e r i s
an ex p a r t e communicat ion and so I am not going to accep t th el e t t e r o r pay heed to th e arguments made in t h a t .
You reques ted t h a t th e l e t t e r be sea l ed if it bef i l ed . I am no t going to f i l e it. I am n o t , t h e r e f o r e ,going t o s ea l it but I am a lso no t going to read it.
I t ' s an ex pa r t e communicat ion .MR. BERG: Your Honor, on t h a t t o p i c , I th ink we
have - - a major problem has developed f u r t h e r by a f i l i n g a t7:30 t h i s morning by Orly T a i t z .
THE COURT: When I was t ak ing th e bench I heardt he re was a f i l i n g a t 7:30 . I d o n ' t know wh at ' s in it.
You might r ea l i z e , Counse l , o r maybe you d o n ' t ,t h a t 6:00 , 7:00 on Friday I 'm ge t t ing ready fo r th e hea r inghere today . Over th e weekend I 'm read ing t h in g s fo r thehea r ing here today and when I get to c o u r t on Monday morningI 'm ge t t ing ready fo r , you know, 30 d i f f e r e n t h ea r in g s , so Id id no t read what was f i l ed a t 7:30 .
How does t h a t c rea t e a problem?MR. BERG: Well , it c rea t e s a problem because
Orly T ai t z has now cont inued to do what she ' s done ongoing .In th e - - on th e pageTHE COURT: L et me ask you t h i s .MR. BERG: Yes.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
10/44
1234
09:57 56789
0957 1011121314
0958 1516171819
09582021222324
095825
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)
THE COURT: Are you d i r e c t i n g your argument towhether I should read your February 24th l e t t e r ?
That ' s th e i ssue I 'm r a i s i n g .ru l ing on t h a t .
I ' ve t o ld you my
Do you wish to address t h a t fu r ther?MR. BERG: I t probably d o e s n ' t mat ter in l i g h t of
what she f i l ed t h i s morning.THE COURT: Okay. Then I'll s t and by my ru l i n g .The l e t t e r w i l l no t be read o r cons ide red . I
cons ider it to be an ex p a r t e communicat ion.
8
I f I were to f i l e it, I would not s e a l it.not sea l it.
I would
f i l e it.
MR. BERG: Okay.THE COURT: So g ran t in g your wishes , I w i l l no tTherefore , I w i l l not sea l it and I w i l l a lso no t
cons ider it.MR. BERG: Let me - - l e t me j u s t th ink t h a t through
fo r a moment, only because o f what she f i l ed t h i s morning.I bel ieve t h a t Orly Tai tz has overstepped her
bounds and the mat ter t h a t th e ex pa r t e l e t t e r dealswith - - a mat ter t h a t i s not publ ic .pr iva te u n t i l th e mat te r i s reso lved .
It's a mat ter t h a t i s
It deals with th e d i s c ip l i n a r y proceed ings inPennsylvania .
THE COURT: Well , are th e ex i s t en ce o f the
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
11/44
1234
09:58 56789
0958 1011121314
0959 1516171819
09592021222324
095925
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)
d i s c ip l i n a r y proceed ings - -MS. TAITZ: (Shakes head . )THE COURT: You d o n ' t need to shake your head,
Counsel .Are the ex i s t en ce of th e d i s c ip l i n a r y proceed ings
p r i v a t e? The ex i s t en ce i s p u b l i c .
p u b l i c .MR. BERG: Once it i s scheduled , t h a t p a r t i s
THE COURT: So th e hear ing has been scheduled .MR. BERG: Yes.THE COURT: So th e answer to my ques t ion i s , yes ,
the ex is tence o f the proceed ings a re p u b l i c .MR. BERG: Correc t .THE COURT: I s there anyth ing you d esc r ib e in your
l e t t e r o t h e r than the f a c t t h a t the p ro ceed in g ' s goingforward?
MR. BERG: No , bu t the problem - -THE COURT: Okay. But then I c a n ' t - - wh y would I
s e a l it, Counsel?Let me a lso tell you someth ing , and I would th ink
a l l of you would under s tand th e F i r s t Amendment to th eConst i tu t ion and p u b l i c access to our co u r t s , and I 'm j u s tnot i n c l i n ed to sea l t h i n g s .
I th ink it l eaves the impress ion with th e p u b l i ct h a t th e c ou r t i s doing something behind c losed doors . I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
12/44
1234
09:59 56789
0959 1011121314
1000 1516171819
10002021222324
100025
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)10
b e l i ev e in a very open courtroom and I am not i n c l i n ed tos e a l documents unless ex t r emely good cause i s shown, and youh av en ' t shown me good cause fo r sea l i n g your l e t t e r .
MR. BERG: Okay. But , Your Honor - - now I rememberth e - -
THE COURT: We're ge t t ing o f f t r ack . Again, I wantto focus on th e motion pro hac vice and I want to focus onth e schedul ing conference .
MR. BERG: Based on t h a t and my t hought s , because Inow remember th e f u l l conten t o f t h a t l e t t e r , which goes to ar e so l u t i o n , I would l i k e it not to be read, not to be f i l ed .
THE COURT: Your l e t t e r to me?MR. BERG: To you.THE COURT: It sounds l i k e we ' re in agreement .MR. BERG: Okay.THE COURT: Done.MR. BERG: Now, th e next p a r t o f t h i s , though, i s
t h a t th e f i l i n g t h i s morning a t 7:30 - - and I happened tocheck th e docket - - Ms. Orly Tai tz has o v e r s t a t ed . Ib e l i ev e , Your Honor, and I d o n ' t have it with me. Maybe
THE COURT: Let me ask , what do the papers go to?Again, Ms. T ai t z , I d o n ' t - - it's hard fo r me to
read t h in g s f i l ed a t 7 :30 .What does the i s su e go to?MS. TAITZ: I was no t planning fo r you to
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
13/44
1234
10:00 56789
1000 1011121314
1000 1516171819
1001 2021222324
1001 25
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)11
read it a t 7:30 .This i s ac tua l ly in wr i t ing what I was planning to
p resen t here in co u r t . As you s t a t ed th e p a r t i e s need toprovide i n format ion in regards to the d i s c ip l i n a r y hear ing .So I provided - - I ca l l ed
THE COURT: Why d id you wai t u n t i l 7:30 to providet ha t ?
MS. TAITZ: I had to t r a v e l to Arizona . I wasmeet ing with a government - -
THE COURT: That d o e s n ' t mat t e r . This c ou r t i simpor tan t t oo .
MS. TAITZ: I was no t planning to make it - -THE REPORTER: I c a n ' t hear you very wel l .THE COURT: Why d o n ' t you s t ep to th e microphone.Step as i d e , Mr. Berg.MS. TAITZ: It was j u s t a wri t t en v ers io n o f what I
was planning to provide here , pursuan t to your o rd e r s ,Your Honor. You asked to prov ide the c ou r t wi th th e s t a t u si n format ion in regards to d i s c ip l i n a r y board hear ing ag a in s tMr. Berg in th e su p e r io r c ou r t o f Pennsy lvan ia .
THE COURT: A ll r i g h t .MS. TAITZ: I ca l l ed them and t hey provided a copy
o f the p e t i t i o n fo r d i s c ip l i n e a g a i n s t him. They providedh is answer. And as p a r t of h is answer the - - t hey a lsoprovided a sworn a f f i d a v i t by h is p a ra l eg a l , Lisa L i b e r i ,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
14/44
1234
10:01 56789
1001 1011121314
1002 1516171819
10022021222324
100225
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)
t h a t s t a t e s t h a t she i s h is p a ra l eg a l , t h a t s h e ' s beenworking with him s i nc e 2006.
The case - -THE COURT: Okay. So you f i l ed a d d i t i o n a l
i n f o r m a t ion on th e pro hac v i c e motion .MS. TAITZ: Yes, yes .THE COURT: T h a t ' s what I need to know.Mr. Berg , I 'm s o r r y to i n t e r r u p t you. I j u s t
12
wanted to see if t h i s was r e l e v a n t t o t he two mat te r s heretoday , the schedul ing conference and th e pro hac v i c e motion .
MR. BERG: I t h in k the o r de r was fo r me to supp lyda t a by l a s t week, l a s t - - I 'm so r ry - - Thursday o r Fr iday .
So first o f f , her s would be l a t e ; bu t I d o n ' tb e l i ev e you 've d i r ec t ed Ms. T ai t z to f i l e r e s pons e s .
THE COURT: Go ahead.MR. BERG: I b e l i ev e it was j u s t fo r me to f i l e a
r esponse .And what Ms. T ai t z d id , acco rd ing to an e xc e r p t o f
he r l e t t e r here - - and I t h in k , Your Honor, she hasove r s t e ppe d , because th e proceed ings I 'm t a l k i n g abou t , p a r ti s pub l i c and p a r t a re p r i v a t e - - the f a c t o f a he a r ing i sp u b l i c .
Your Honor, in th e r esponse she f i l e d t oday shesa ys , in p a r t " judge on t h i s case reques ted" - - "T a i t z ca l l edMare," M-a- r -e - - M-a- r - c -e (ph) , "Marcee Sloan and adv i sed
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
15/44
1234
10:02 56789
1003 1011121314
1003 1516171819
10032021222324
100325
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)13
her t h a t At torney Berg f i l ed a pro hac vice in a f ed e ra ld i s t r i c t c ou r t i n Ca l i fo rn i a and th e judge on t h i s casereques ted an update rega rd ing th e s t a tu s of the d i s c ip l i n a r yboard hear ing ag a in s t Berg."
I b e l i ev e , and I have not had t ime to check it,Your Honor - -
THE COURT: Can I sum up and say you d o n ' t b e l i ev eI should review t hose papers in de te rmin ing your pro hac viceapp l ica t ion?
MR. BERG: Yes, t h a t ' s p a r t o f it, Your Honor; bu tt h e o th e r p a r t - -
THE COURT: Okay. So t h a t ' s reques t N o . 1 .I j u s t need to know what we ' r e d i scu s s in g . You
fo lks have a tendency to unrave l in to a mi l l i o n d i f f e r e n taspec t s o f your feud with each o t h e r .
We're focus ing now on your pro hac v i c e .You say I should not read t hose papers .I w i l l cons ide r your r eq u es t .What i s th e next poin t?MR. BERG: But th e problem i s , I bel ieve - - and
w e ' l l check it fu r t h e r - - t h a t she conveyed to thed i s c ip l i n a r y board t h a t she was c a l l i n g on your b eh a l f ,Your Honor, because t hose documents t h a t were sen t to hershould not have been sen t t o her because they werec o n f i d e n t i a l documents; and I b e l i ev e if you had g o t t en them
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
16/44
1234
10:03 56789
1004 1011121314
1004 1516171819
10042021222324
100425
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)14
o r you had read them t h a t t hey would no t become p a r t of ther ecord because - -
THE COURT: You 've made a r e que s t t h a t I no tcons ide r the documents .to t h i s cour t?
Are you a l so making a no the r r e que s t
MR. BERG: I 'm making a r e que s t t h a t t h i s c o u r tf ind o u t how t hey go t those mat e r i a l s , because by g e t t i n gt hos e m a t e r i a l s s h e ' s no w f i l ed it and it's now allover th eIn t e rn e t . This has been pub l i s he d and it's sp read - - becauset h a t ' s what she does .
This document has been f i l e d in your case anda l r e a dy it's allover th e In t e rn e t , and I t h in k t h a t by doingt h a t she v i o l a t ed h er oa th as an a t t o r n e y because she knowsth e d i s c i p l i n a ry board proceed ings a re p r i v a t e . And a l so Ib e l i ev e she conveyed t h a t she was c a l l i n g on your b e h a l f ,Your Honor , and I would l i k e t he c ou r t to make t h a t i n q u i rybecause if she was f i l i n g on your b e h a l f I t h in k sa nc t i onsshould go ag a in s t he r .
THE COURT: I w i l l t ake t h a t r e que s t underco n s id e ra t io n .
I s th e re any th ing e l s e you would l i k e to say onyour pro hac v i c e mot ion?
MR. BERG: No. On my mot ion I submi t ted , Ib e l i ev e t h a t - - I would r e que s t t h i s c ou r t to g r a n t me prohac vice in t h i s c a s e .
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
17/44
1234
10:05 56789
1005 1011121314
1005 1516171819
10052021222324
100525
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)15
There i s a p u b l i c record . There i s a d i s c ip l i n a r yproceed ing pending , bu t u n t i l the mat te r i s re so lved I amstill in good s tand ing . I have been prac t i c ing law now fo r40 - - w e l l , 39 and a h a l f y ea r s , Your Honor, and I ' v e had - t h i s mat t e r i s before t h e co u r t a t t h a t t ime .
THE COURT: A ll r i g h t . Now, when you say t h a t , ana t t o rn ey can be in good s t and ing wi th the sanct ion orderst h a t have been imposed ag a in s t you?
MR. BERG: No - - yes , I am in good s tand ing .i s - - no sanct ion or de r has been ag a i n s t me in t h i sproceed ing .
There
THE COURT: Can an a t t o rn ey be in good s t and ingwhen a co u r t has sa i d , "This c ou r t has grown weary o fMr. Berg ' s cont inuous and brazen di s re spec t towards t h i sco u r t and h is own c l i e n t s . Mr. Berg ' s own ac t ions inc lud ingth e i n s t an t motion fo r r eco n s id e ra t io n se rve to d iv e r tj u d i c i a l re sources from l eg i t i ma t e mat t e r s , and t h i s c ou r tcannot in good consc ience a l low t h i s conduct to gounpubl ished"?
Now, my ques t ion i s - - it's a l eg a l ques t ion - - Id o n ' t mean to pre judge or p re load .
Can you be in good s t and ing when a judge has i s suedsuch a s ta tement?
MR. BERG: Where are you reading from? What casei s t h a t , Your Honor, if I may?
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
18/44
1234
10:06 56789
1006 1011121314
1006 1516171819
10062021222324
100625
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)16
THE COURT: I b e l i ev e t h a t i s the Holsworth versusBerg case ou t o f t he Eas te rn D i s t r i c t o f Pennsy lvan ia .
MR. BERG: That t h a t case has long beenr e so l ve d , Your Honor.
THE COURT: Okay. So j u s t - -MR. BERG: Okay.THE COURT: Le t ' s be c lea r : Your a nswe r ' s , "Yes,
Your Honor, I can be in good s t and ing d esp i t e t h a t order . "MR. BERG: Yes, Your Honor.THE COURT: And you can say, "Your Honor" - - you ' re
in prac t i ce fo r many decades ; along th e way a judge mightsanct ion you and t h a t does not make you not in good s tand ing .
I 'm j u s t asking t h a t ques t ion and I t h in k I j u s tgave your answer.
MR. BERG: Yes.THE COURT: Okay. A ll r i g h t .Anything e l se , t hen , on the good s tand ing i s sue?And a lso the way you j u s t phrased your answer a few
moments ago, it - - a re you conceding t h a t it's poss ib lefo l lowing t h i s d i s c ip l i n a r y mat te r you would not be in goods t and ing?
MR. BERG: No.THE COURT: T h a t ' s not p o ss ib l e?MR. BERG: I guess it's p o ss i b l e .THE COURT: Well , if th e ru l ing goes ag a in s t you,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
19/44
1234
10:07 56789
1007 1011121314
1007 1516171819
10072021222324
100725
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)17
you would t hen no t be in good s t and ing because you would thenno t be a l lowed to p r a c t i c e ; r i g h t ?
MR. BERG: Well , if the ru l in g would go ag a in s t me,then t h e r e i s a whole - - t h e r e ' s a whole - - remember, in t h i sUni ted S t a t e s o f America you ' r e innocent u n t i l proven g u i l t y .T he r e ' s a pr oc e s s . That would be a he a r i ng . Af t e r t h a thear ing t h e r e ' s an appea l pr oc e s s and t hen t h e r e i s a no the rappea l pr oc e s s .
THE COURT: Okay. L et me ask you t h i s - - I'lll e a ve it a t t h a t .
MR. BERG: Your honor - - and u n t i l th e f i n a l appeali s over , t h e r e ' s - - no ac t io n i s t a ke n .
THE COURT: A ll r i g h t . I s your c l i e n t here inc o u r t today?
MR. BERG: No, he i s no t .THE COURT: Okay, t h a t ' s f i n e . C l i en t s d o n ' t need
to be here in co u r t .MR. BERG: I had asked him to be he r e .THE COURT: Pa r t o f my concern i s my - - f r a nk l y ,
should I even be a l lowing you to make an appearance? becauseth e pro hac v i c e i s no t gr a n t e d . But I a l so t h i nk in th eUni ted S t a t e s you ' r e innocent u n t i l proven g u i l t y and so I 'ma l lowing you to make your appearances u n t i l we make a ru l in gon t h a t .
A ll r i g h t . Anyth ing e l se on th e pro hac v i c e , and
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
20/44
1234
10:07 56789
1008 1011121314
1008 1516171819
10082021222324
100825
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)18
th e answer i s no?MR. BERG: No.THE COURT: A ll r i g h t . L e t ' s t u rn then to th e
de f e ns e , focus ing only on th e pro hac v ice . I ' v e r ead yourpa pe r s ; t hey a re voluminous . There a re some sa nc t i on o rd e r s .
L et me ask you, can an a t t o r n e y be a member in goods t and ing and e l i g i b l e to p r a c t i c e before a c o u r t a f t e r asa nc t i on o r de r has i s sue d with those words?
MS. TAITZ: I d o n ' t know th e ru l e s of thePennsylvania Supreme Court .
THE COURT: Well , th e ru l e s o f t h i s c o u r t a re whatI j u s t s a i d . He has to be in good s t a nd i ng .
Do you t h in k it's p o ss ib l e he could be in goods t and ing a f t e r such a sa nc t i on o r de r i s i s sued?
MS. TAITZ: I 'm so r ry , Your Honor, I d o n ' t know th eanswer .
THE COURT: Okay. Good answer .MS. TAITZ: But if I might s t a t e , t he s a nc t i on
proceed ings a re open to the p u b l i c . I have ca l l ed th ed i s c i p l i n a r y board , I have t a l k e d t o t he s e c r e t a r y o f th eboard , and I t a lk ed t o t he c oo r d i na t o r . As a mat te r o f f a c t ,I asked if I can t r a v e l t o t he hear ing and t hey s a i d , yes , iti s open to th e p u b l i c .
So Mr. B e r g ' s s t a t e m e n t t h a t t h i s i s n o t open, it'sno t t r u e .
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
21/44
1234
10:09 56789
1009 1 0
11121314
1009 1516171819
10102021222324
101025
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)
They pos t e d on th e Webs i t e an announcement t h a tt h e r e i s a hear ing by th e d i s c i p l i n a r y board .
19
I have c a l l e d , I have s t a t e d t h a t Mr. Berg - wha t ' s w r i t t en in th e papers - - asked fo r pro hac v i c e . Thejudge on th e case wants to know th e s t a t u s o f th e case andshe has e-mai l ed me a copy of the compla in t and a copy o f h isanswer . But what i s most t ro u b l in g and what t h i s i n d iv id u a lhas done fo r the l a s t ye a r and a h a l f he i s working wi th aconvic ted document f o r ge r , a woman by th e name of - -
THE COURT: A ll r i g h t . So you b e l i ev e t h a t ifsomeone h i r e s a document f o r ge r t he y canno t be in goods t and ing to p r a c t i c e before t h e i r home s t a t e ?
T h a t ' s t he s t anda rd I 'm app ly ing he r e .MS. TAITZ: Well , t h a t ' s why t h e re a re proceed ings
ag a in s t Mr. Berg. The d i s c i p l i n a ry board of the SupremeCour t o f Pennsylvania has sugges ted from - -
THE COURT: I 'm no t he a r ing a ye s - o r - no answer tomy que s t i on .
MS. TAITZ: Well , t he y have asked t he p roba t iondepar tmen t to forward th e f i l e to them, so t h e r e i s an o ta t io n in h er f i l e t h a t it was forwarded to th e SupremeCour t o f Pennsy lvan ia . They found t h i s ou t j u s t r e c e n t l y ,and I b e l i ev e t h a t more evidence i s going to be coming andt h e r e might be more charges ag a in s t Mr. Berg wi th th ed i s c i p l i n a r y board o f Pennsy lvan ia .
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
22/44
1234
10: 10 56789
1011 1011121314
1011 1516171819
10 11 2021222324
10 11 25
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)20
So it i s my under s tand ing t h a t t h a t p a r t i c u l a rhear ing was pos tponed to March. They a re p rov id ing moreev idence . My under s tand ing i s t h a t h is - - t h a t t h e re w i l l besan c t io n s ag a in s t Mr. Berg and t h a t ' s why I 'm asking t h i shonorab le c ou r t not t o g ran t Mr. Berg pro hac vice u n t i l th ed i s c i p l i n a r y ac t io n ag a in s t him i s r e so l ve d .
THE COURT: Now, when you say t h a t , a re youconceding t h a t your oppos i t i on to h is pro hac vice depends ont h a t d i s c i p l i n a r y hear ing and noth ing e l s e?
MS. TAITZ: Well , t h i s - - Your Honor, you have - -THE COURT: Boy, it sure would be nice if you could
say "yes" or "no" and then g ive an e xp l a na t i on , bu t I'lll i s t e n to the e xp l a na t i on .
MS. TAITZ: Ac t ua l l y , it d o e s n ' t because he wasa l read y sanc t ioned twice by th e f ed e ra l c ou r t sys tem.
THE COURT: So it seems to me your argument shouldbe if I c a n ' t deny it based on the prev ious san c t io n s thend o n ' t g r a n t it u n t i l I hear th e r e s u l t s of th e hea r ing .
MS. TAITZ: Ac t ua l l y , t h a t might be one answer .Another answer i s you have a r i g h t to deny pro hac vice basedon the f a c t t h a t he was a l read y sanc t ioned twice .
THE COURT: You d i d n ' t hear what I s a i d .T h a t ' s ex ac t ly what I j u s t s a i d .Okay. Go ahead.Anyth ing e l se on the pro hac vice?
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
23/44
1234
10: 12 56789
10121011121314
10121516171819
10132021222324
101325
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)21
MS. TAITZ: J u s t to give an i dea of the l ev e l o fmalice t h a t I have exper ienced coming from Mr. Berg, not onlyhe ' s using a convic ted document fo rg e r , Lisa L i b e r i , who i scur ren t ly on probat ion u n t i l March 21s t
THE COURT: Do you t h in k when I , in t h i s co u r t ,f ind someone g u i l t y o f forging documents , it's then myr e s p o n s ib i l i t y to make sure they never ge t ano the r job?
MS. TAITZ: No, t h a t ' s not what I 'm say ing .What I 'm say ing , Your Honor, i s t h a t th e h i s t o ry of
f i l i n g s and plead ings f i l ed by Mr. Berg in a case t h a t i ssomewhat re l a t ed to t h i s in Pennsy lvan ia , shows t h a t not onlyt h i s woman was convic ted , they cont inued f i l i n g forgeddocuments of p e r ju red a f f i d a v i t s .
He i s c la iming t h a t she i s working in h is o f f i c e inPennsylvania whi le she i s on p ro b a t io n , not a l lowed to l i v et h e re i n Pennsy lvan ia . According to the terms of he rp ro b a t io n , t h i s woman can r e s i d e only i n Ca l i fo rn i a o rNew Mexico and she had to f i l e an a f f i d a v i t with th ed i s c ip l i n a r y board saying t h a t she i s r i g h t there inPennsylvania working in h is o f f i ce . And t h a t i s re l a t ed to ap r i o r case where there was misconduct by him and he i s usingher to s o r t o f suppor t h is p o i n t .
So it's no t only t h a t t h i s woman was convic ted o fforge ry b efo re . This i s an ongoing conduct t h a t i sg re a t l y - - g re a t l y undermines t h e co u r t and t h a t caused
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
24/44
1234
10: 13 56789
10131011121314
10141516171819
10142021222324
101425
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)22
enormous emot ional d i s t r e s s and f i n an c i a l damages to a l o t o fpe op le .
THE COURT: Well , b e l i ev e me, t h i s c ou r t i s ve r yf i rm in its oppos i t i on t o p e r j u ry and I t h i nk it's de c i s i onsr eg u l a r l y r e f l e c t t h a t ; bu t it seems to me you ' r e making a" g u i l t by assoc ia t ion" argument ; i s t h a t co r rec t ?
MS. TAITZ: No. No. I f you - -THE COURT: You ' re no t say ing Mr. Berg f i l e d those
f r a udu l e n t documents?MS. TAITZ: Yes. Yes, he d id . Mr. Berg has f i l e d
a pe r j u r e d a f f i d a v i t .THE COURT: Well , t hen what does t h a t have to do
with t h i s o th e r woman?MS. TAITZ: Well , in h is pe r j u r e d - - in h is
d i s c i p l i n a r y proceed ing a compla in t was f i l e d because hed i d n ' t answer to th e
THE COURT: So maybe I should focus on whatMr. Berg has done r a t h e r t han what someone he has h i red
MS. TAITZ: Oh, I am j u s t say ing t h a t n o t on ly hei s commit t ing p e r j u r y , he i s subo r d i na t i ng p e r j u r y by us ing adocument f o r ge r who i s concur r ing wi th him in h er sworna f f i d a v i t . Both o f them have f i l e d sworn a f f i d a v i t s wi th th ed i s c i p l i n a r y board o f Pennsylvania say ing t h a t , indeed , hehas responded t o h i s c l i e n t , t h a t the c l i e n t accused him o fde f r a ud ing he r , t h a t h is case was dismissed because he d i d n ' t
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
25/44
1234
10: 14 56789
10151011121314
10151516171819
10152021222324
101525
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)23
f i l e proper motion and t h a t he def rauded her and fo r a yearkep t l y in g t o he r and t e l l i n g her t h a t the case i s going on.
THE COURT: Okay.MS. TAITZ: So he committed p e r j u ry by say ing , no,
I provided t h i s i n format ion to the c l i e n t , and he brought as t a t ement from t h i s - - from t h i s fo rg e r , t h i s woman who haste n fe lony convic t ions in fo rgery and t h e f t and i s no tal lowed to res ide in Pennsylvania , who f i l ed a s t a t ementsay ing I am h is a s s i s t a n t in h is o f f i c e , and, yes , Mr. Bergf i l ed proper documents and ca l l ed the - - th e - - th e c l i e n tand d i d n ' t do anyth ing wrong.
THE COURT: Okay. Let me ask t h i s . Mr. Berg sayst h a t you t o ld th e d i s c ip l i n a r y fo lks in Pennsylvania t h a t youwere ca l l i n g on my b eh a l f .
I s t h a t t ru e?MS. TAITZ: No, t h a t ' s not what I s a i d .THE COURT: Okay. I'll take your answer, "no."You' re denying t h a t .Let me j u s t say to a l l p a r t i e s here , please be very
ca re fu l about what you a t t r i b u t e to t h i s co u r t . You haveabso lu te F i r s t Amendment r igh t s to t a lk about t h i s case and Iwouldn ' t be su rp r i sed if on th e In t e rn e t y o u ' r e a l r ead y doingt h a t .
J u s t be very ca re fu l , p a r t i c u l a r l y when you ' ret a lk ing to fo lks l i ke d i s c ip l i n a r y boards about what you say
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
26/44
1
2
34
10: 15 5
6789
10161011121314
10161516171819
10162021222324
101625
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)24
about what t h i s c ou r t has done .I f I see people a re gather ing i n format ion o r us ing
miss ta tements about t h i s c ou r t to t h e i r advantage t h a t ' ssomething I 'm going to have to dea l wi th .
Do you have anyth ing fu r t h e r to say on the i s su e ofth e pro hac v ice ap p l i ca t io n ?
MS. TAITZ: Yes.THE COURT: I ' v e read a l l your papers . They ' re
ve ry thorough, very complete .You can see I ' v e tabbed them.
I ' v e read them a l l comple te ly .
Anything e l se on the pro hac vice ap p l i ca t i o n s?MS. TAITZ: Yes. Pro hac vice was no t gran ted to
Mr. Berg, and s p e c i f i c a l l y you i s sued a n o t i ce say ing youdecl ined to g ran t it and t h e re fo re the c l i e n t
THE COURT: Now I 'm confused.What pro hac v ice wasn ' t gran ted?MS. TAITZ: It was not gran ted . You s t a t ed t h a t
you d ec l in ed to g ran t u n t i l t h e re i s a hear ing , u n t i l youknow wh at ' s happening with th e d i s c ip l i n a r y board inPennsylvania .
THE COURT: Well , t h a t ' s s o r t o f what I sa i d , bu tgo ahead.
MS. TAITZ: There fore th e c l i e n t , Mr. Lincoln , wassupposed to be here in co u r t .
THE COURT: I ' v e a l ready ru led on t h a t . He need
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
27/44
1234
10: 16 56789
10171011121314
10171516171819
10172021222324
101725
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)
not be here .Go ahead.MS. TAITZ: I have f i l ed one more motion .Mr. Lincoln i s ordered in contempt of cour t andTHE COURT: What ' s the motion? Is t h a t pending
before me r i g h t now?
20th.
MS. TAITZ: Yes, it was - - it was f i l e d .THE COURT: When d id you f i l e t h i s ?MS. TAITZ: I th ink it was two weeks ago on th e
THE COURT: The motion i s what?
25
MS. TAITZ: To extend $150,000 o f sanct ions ag a i n s tMr. Lincoln t h a t were assessed ag a i n s t him by the ch ie fjudge of the Western D i s t r i c t o f Texas.
THE COURT: No. I 'm not the enforcement arm fo rt h a t co u r t . I enforce my own orders .
So y o u ' l l have to go back to t h a t co u r t .A ll r i g h t .Anything e l se on the motion pro hac vice?MR. HAGGERTY: No, Your Honor.MR. BERG: Ju s t a b r i e f response .Ms. Tai tz was a l lud ing to fac t s t h a t d o n ' t ex i s t a t
t h i s t ime. I mean, s h e ' s t a lk ing about a document beingforged and submi t t ing documents
THE COURT: Okay.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
28/44
1234
10: 17 56789
10181011121314
10181516171819
10182021222324
101825
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)
MR. BERG: Thank you.THE COURT: L et me ask t h i s .I 'm t roub led by g e t t i n g f i l i n g s a t 7:30 i n the
morning and Ms. T ai t z t a l k i n g about t h i s motion and t h a tmot ion .
26
What would the p a r t i e s th ink if I i s sued an or de rt h a t you need to seek l eave o f t h i s co u r t before you f i l ed adocument?
Do you have anyth ing to say about t h a t , Mr. Berg?MR. BERG: I would encourage t h a t .THE COURT: A ll r i g h t .And, Ms. T a i t z , o r any defendant?MR. ROSS: Yes, Your Honor.Jonathan Ross on b eh a l f o f Defendant Yosef T ai t z
and Dayl igh t Chemical .THE COURT: Do you under s tand what I 'm cons ide r ing
to propose? We're now here a t a schedul ing conferencede te rmin ing how t h i s case w i l l p ro g res s .
The volume o f documents , r i g h t and l e f t , i nc l ud i nga t 7:30 t h i s morning, make it d i f f i c u l t fo r the co u r t to keepup. I f ind some of t he documents unnecessa ry .
What about an or de r t h a t you must f i r s t have l eaveo f t h i s cour t be fore you f i l e anything?
MR. ROSS: Well , Your Honor, my concern i s so le lyas to my c l i e n t s . We've only f i l ed one mot ion , th e o r i g i n a l
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
29/44
1234
10: 18 56789
10191011121314
10191516171819
10192021222324
101925
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)
motion to di smiss which the co u r t gran ted o u t s id e o f onecause o f ac t io n quantum merui t , but no t as to - -
THE COURT: So you oppose t h a t idea?
27
MR. ROSS: As to my c l i e n t I oppose t h a t i d ea . Wehave not been abusive .
THE COURT: Other defendants?MS. TAITZ: I oppose because I have exper ience with
Mr. Berg in Pennsylvania where we - - I askedTHE COURT: Mr. Berg i s w i l l i n g to submit to an
o rd e r from me hold on. Hold on. That ' s anothe r littlet h in g . You have to wa i t u n t i l I f i n i s h t a l k i n g . I 'm doingmost of the l i s t en in g bu t occas iona l ly I g e t to t a l k .
Mr. Berg agreed to submit to an or de r from me t h a tt h e re w i l l be no f i l i n g s wi thout my approval .
Go ahead .MS. TAITZ: What Mr. Berg does , in r e a l i t y , he
submi t ted in Pennsylvania and then he cont inued f i l i n gemergency l e t t e r s .
THE COURT: He wouldn ' t be al lowed to do t h a t underth e ru l ing I ' v e made and he sa i d he would accep t it.
MR. ROSS: He accep ted it t h e re and then hecont inued f i l i n g emergency l e t t e r s .
THE COURT: Then he would be sa nc t i one d .Do you have anyth ing e l se to say about my proposa l
t h a t l eave of co u r t be obta ined be fore f i l i n g something?
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
30/44
1234
10: 19 56789
1020 1011121314
1020 1516171819
10202021222324
102025
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)28
MS. TAITZ: I 'm j u s t concerned because my - - myproblem was t h a t he - - as a mat te r o f fac t , I unders tand Iunder s tand t h a t h is a s s i s t a n t i s th e one t h a t was f i l i n gt hose emergency l e t t e r s . They were voluminous , and as Isa id - - I asked fo r it. Th e judge t h e re i n Pennsylvaniagran ted and - - as a m a t t e r o f fac t , he was not al lowed tof i l e anyth ing u n t i l th e i s su e o f j u r i s d i c t i o n i s r e so l ve d .
THE COURT: Okay. Now we ' r e g e t t i n g o f f t r a c k .I w i l l no t ye t impose t h a t or de r bu t I am going to
c ons i de r t h a t or de r based on th e f i l i n g s I g e t i n the f u t u r e .So be a l e r t to th e f a c t t h a t we may u l t i ma t e l y
impose t h a t o rd e r .We now tu rn to th e schedul ing confe rence , Counsel ,
and we do have l o t s o f o th e r fo lks ou t here and I apolog izeto you a l l t h a t t he se i n i t i a l mat te r s have t aken some t ime .
But moving along, I see both s id es agree t h a t t h i si s a j u ry trial and t hey have proposed t h a t it be t r i e d onMay 12 th , 2012, and t hey are t a l k i n g about a f i v e - t o s ix -d aytrial.
I s t h a t th e agreement of the p a r t i e s ?MS. TAITZ: No, Your Honor, because it was
agreement was reached before you dismissed t he case . Nowt h e re i s no ca s e .
Depending on what w i l l be f i l ed and what w i l l be - -THE COURT: So what do you propose fo r
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
31/44
1234
10:20 56789
1021 1011121314
1021 1516171819
1021 2021222324
1021 25
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)
a t r i a l date?MS. TAITZ:THE COURT:
confe rence .
I bel ieve we need to postponeOkay. We're a t a schedul ing
My order says a t r i a l date w i l l be s e t a t th eschedul ing conference , so we w i l l s e t a t r i a l d a t e .
29
What do th e defense propose? I thought the defensewas in agreement t h a t it would be March 12th .
MR. HAGGERTY: I am in agreement with t h a t ,Your Honor.
B i l l Haggerty on b eh a l f o f the Law Off ices o f OrlyTai tz and Orly T ai t z as an i n d i v i d u a l .
However, we a re wai t ing a second amended compla in t .THE COURT: I unders t and .MR. HAGGERTY: And I d o n ' tTHE COURT: That i s o f t en th e case .MR. HAGGERTY: So I d o n ' t know. I f we' re j u s t
t a lk ing about a quantum merui t cla im it's going to be l e s sthan f i v e o r s ix days.
THE COURT: Okay.MR. HAGGERTY: I f t h e re ' s 12 o r 13 causes o f ac t ion
t h a t somehow he i s ab le to p lead , it might go to f ive ors ix days , so it i s d i f f i c u l t a t t h i s t ime to l e t Your Honorknow if I agree with t h a t .
THE COURT: Okay. I unders t and . Fa i r enough.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
32/44
1234
10:21 56789
1022 1011121314
1022 1516171819
10222021222324
102225
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)
That p a r a l l e l s what Ms. Tai tz sa i d .
2012.
Ms. Bredahl , i s March 12th a Tuesday?THE CLERK: No, it's a Monday.THE COURT: We s t a r t our t r i a l s on Tuesday.We're going to s t a r t t h i s trial on March 13th ,
30
We are going to s e t it fo r s ix days.j u ry trial.
It w i l l be a
The p r e t r i a l confe rence - - and you want to w r i t et h i s down - - w i l l t ake p lace on - -
THE CLERK: February 27th .THE COURT: - - February 27th , 2012.And the d i sc ove r y cu t o f f w i l l be - -THE CLERK: December 13 t h .THE COURT: December 13th , 2011.I f you fill in those d a tes on the f ro n t page of the
schedul ing orde r which i s av a i l ab l e here when you check in ,it w i l l produce o th e r d a t e s and it w i l l a lso produce o th e rru l e s on how to conduct the l i t i g a t i o n .
So I urge you - - in f a c t , I o rd e r you to bef ami l i a r with the da tes produced by t h a t schedul ing orde rbes ides what we've j u s t done here .
Now, I'll say to you and I'll say to everyone e l sein the cour t room here on a schedul ing confe rence , whenp a r t i e s appear fo r schedul ing conference I a lso o rd e r them to
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
33/44
1234
10:22 56789
1023 1011121314
1023 1516171819
10232021222324
102325
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)
d i sc uss the r e so l u t i o n o f t h i s case when t he y l e a ve .You w i l l no t have a trial in t h i s c ou r t un le s s
you 've appeared be f o r e a t h i rd p a r t y media to r t o d i sc us ss e t t l e m e n t .
Now i s a good t ime to beg in t hos e d i s c u s s i o n s ,perhaps even to s e t t l e th e case as you l eave . So I 'm
31
or de r i ng t he p a r t i e s here to t a l k to Mr. Berg and d i sc uss t hep o s s i b i l i t i e s o f how t h i s case might be r e s o lve d and a l so tod i sc uss what t h i r d p a r t y media to r might be i nvo lved as th etrial da t e of May 13 th app roaches .
A ll r i g h t . I 'm going to t ake the - MR. BERG: Your HonorTHE COURT: Yes.MR. BERG: you sa id May 1 3 t h .THE COURT: I meant March 13 .MR. BERG: I a po log i z e .THE COURT: No, no, p l e a s e . That was a good p o i n t .Mr. Berg , I 'm go ing to t ake t he ma t t e r o f your pro
hac vice admiss ion under submiss ion and ru l e on t h a t s h o r t l y .I d id have a que s t i on . I b e l i ev e somewhere I read
t h a t Mr. Linco ln was an ex te rn to numerous f e de r a l j udge s .I s t h a t t r ue ?MR. BERG: That i s c o r r e c t .THE COURT: So he was an ex te rn to Judge Reinhard t .
Do you know when?
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
34/44
1234
10:23 56789
1024 1011121314
1024 1516171819
10242021222324
102425
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx)32
MR. BERG: I d o n ' t have t h a t i n f ro n t o f me,Your Honor .
THE COURT: And do you know what o t h e r f e de r a ljudge he was an ex te rn to?
MR. BERG: I 'm no t sure . I can g e t t h a t to youl a t e r today .
THE COURT: T h a t ' s n o t im por t a n t .So we've argued th e admiss ion of t he pro hac v i c e ,
we've s e t our trial d a t e , and Mr. - - I'm s o r r y , was itMr. Ross?
MR. ROSS: Yes, Your Honor, me?MR. HAGGERTY: Hagger ty .THE COURT: Oh, Mr. Hagger ty , t h e re you a r e .Mr. Hagger ty , if a f t e r th e motion t o d i sm i s s , th e
case ge t s ex t remely s i m p l i f i e d and you want to move up th etrial d a t e , j u s t br ing it up as soon as we g e t a r e so l u t i o non th e mot ion to d i sm i s s .
So I 'm hear ing what y o u ' r e s a y ing .I f ind t h a t e f f i c i e n c y i s promoted by a t l e a s t
having a da te to aim a t , and in a l l f a i r n e s s it's b e s t to aima t a wor s t - c a se sc e na r i o I s h o u l d n ' t say wor s t - c a sescenar io - - th e sc e na r i o of a l a rg e compla in t .
I f you want to move up th e trial da t e a f t e r - - whenand if you succeed in nar rowing th e compla in t , I'll look a tsuch motions .
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
35/44
1234
10:24 56789
10111213141516171819202122232425
022811 DCCD GUILFORD CR 10D LINCOLN SACV 10-1973-AG(PLAx) 33
Anything fu r t h e r from th e p a r t i e s , then?ALL RESPONSE: No, Your Honor .Thank you.THE COURT: Okay.(End o f proceed ings . )
***C er t i f i c a t e
I hereby c e r t i f y t h a t th e fo regoing i s a t rue andco r re c t t r a n s c r i p t of the s t en o g rap h i ca l l y recordedproceed ings in th e above mat t e r .
Fees charged fo r t h i s t r a n sc r i p t , l e s s any c i r c u i tfee redu c t ion and/or d ep o s i t , a re in conformance wi th theregu la t i ons of the j u d i c i a l confe ren ce of the
D i < . l l o l ~ "" r>
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
36/44
$$150,000 [1] -
25:12
0
022811 [1] - 2:203/22/2011 [1] -
33:14
1
1 [2] - 2:12 ,
13:12
10-1573-AG(PLAx
[3] - 1:10, 2:2 ,
1:2
10199 [2] - 1:24,
33:14
10D [2] - 1:4, 2:2
10th [1] - 2:16
12 [2] - 2:4 ,
29:21
12th [3] -
28:18 , 29:8
, 30:2
13 [2] - 29:21
, 31:15
13th [5] - 30:5
, 30:14 ,
30:15 , 31:10
, 31:14
150,000 [1] -
4:3
19444-2531 [1] - 2:5
2
2006 [1] - 12:2
2011 [4] - 1:18
, 1:1 ,
6:24 , 30:15
2012 [3] -
28:18 , 30:6
, 30:12
20th [1] -
25:10
211 [1] - 2:921st [1] - 21:4
24th [2] - 6:23
, 8:2
26302 [1] - 2:9
27th [3] - 2:12 ,
30:11 , 30:12
28 [2] - 1:18 ,
1:1
3
30 [1] - 7:18
39 [1] - 15:4
4
40 [1] - 15:4
5
555 [1] - 2:4
562-983-2500 [1] -
2:13
6
610-825-3134 [1] -
2:5
610-834-7659 [1] -
2:6
6:00 [1] - 7:15
7
7 [1] - 1:2
700 [1] - 2:16
7:00 [1] - 7:15
7:30 [9] - 7:11
, 7:13 ,
7:19 , 10:18
, 10:23 ,
11:1 , 11:6, 26:3 ,
26:20
8
818-243-5200 [1] -
2:17
818-243-5266 [1] -
2:17
9
90831-2700 [1] - 2:1391203-1202 [1] - 2:16
92691 [1] - 2:9
949-683-5411 [1] -
2:10
A
able [1] -
29:22
absolute [1] -
23:21
abusive [1] -
27:5
accept [2] -
7:3 , 27:20
accepted [1] -
27:21access [1] -
9:22
according [3]
- 5:14 , 12:18
, 21:16
accused [1] -
22:24
action [5] - 2:5
, 17:12 ,
20:6 , 27:2
, 29:21
actions [3] -
3:1 , 3:25
, 15:15additional [1]
- 12:4
additionally [1]
- 3:25
address [3] -
1:22 , 1:23
, 8:5
admission [3]
- 1:24 , 31:19
, 32:8
advantage [1]
- 24:3
advised [1] -
12:25
affidavit [4] -
11:25 , 21:18
, 22:11 ,
22:22
affidavits [2] -
21:13 , 22:22
ago [2] - 16:19
, 25:9
agree [2] -
28:16 , 29:24
agreed [1] -
27:13
agreement [5]
- 10:14 , 28:20
, 28:22 ,29:8 , 29:9
ahead [5] -
12:15 , 20:24
, 24:22 ,
25:2 , 27:15
aim [2] - 32:20
AL [1] - 1:13
al [1] - 1:4
alert [1] -
28:11
alleged [1] -
3:7
allow [2] -
6:18 , 15:18
allowed [9] -
4:12 , 4:15
, 5:9 ,5:11 , 17:2
, 21:15 ,
23:8 , 27:19
, 28:6
allowing [2] -
17:20 , 17:23
alluding [1] -
25:22
amend [1] -
2:8
amended [4] -
2:20 , 3:18
, 5:20 ,
29:13
Amendment [2]
- 9:21 ,
23:21
America [1] -
17:5
ANA [2] - 1:17 ,
1:1
analysis [2] -
4:21 , 5:18
Andorra [1] - 2:4
ANDREW [1] - 1:4
announcement [1]
- 19:1
answer[14] -
9:11 , 11:24
, 16:14 ,
16:18 , 18:1
, 18:16 ,
18:17 , 19:7
, 19:17 ,
20:19 , 20:20
, 22:16 ,
23:17
answer's [1] -
16:7
anticipate [1]
- 2:21
anticipated [1]
- 3:8apologize [5] -
1:14 , 2:15
, 6:4 ,
28:14 , 31:16
appeal [3] -
17:7 , 17:8
, 17:11
Appealing [1]
- 3:16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
022811 DCCD GUILFORD 10D LINCOLN
1
appear[1] -
30:25
appearance [1]
- 17:20
appearances [1]
- 17:23
appeared [1] -
31:3application [3]
- 6:22 ,
13:9 , 24:6
applications [1]
- 24:11
applying [1] -
19:13
approaches [1]
- 31:10
approval [1] -
27:14
argued [1] -
32:8
argument [3] -8:1 , 20:16
, 22:6
arguments [1]
- 7:4
Arizona [1] -
11:8
arm [1] - 25:15
aside [1] -
11:15
aspects [1] -
13:15
assessed [1] -
25:13
assistant [2] -
23:9 , 28:3
association [1]
- 22:6
attention [1] -
6:2
Attorney [1] -
13:1
attorney [4] -
14:13 , 15:7
, 15:12 ,
18:6
attribute [1] -
23:20
available [1] -
30:17
aware [1] -
6:25
B
based [6] - 2:9
, 2:23 ,
10:9 , 20:17
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
37/44
, 20:20 ,
28:10
Beach [1] - 2:13
become [1] -
14:1
begin [1] -
31:5
beginning [1] - 5:16
BEHALF [2] - 2:3,
2:8
behalf[9] - 1:6
, 1:8 ,
1:12 , 13:22
, 14:15 ,
14:17 , 23:14
, 26:14 ,
29:11
Behar[1] - 2:12
behind [1] -
9:25
bench [1] -7:12
BERG [49] -
1:8 , 2:15
, 2:19 ,
5:24 , 6:3
, 7:1 , 7:9
, 7:21 ,
7:25 , 8:6
, 8:13 ,
8:17 , 9:7
, 9:10 ,
9:13 , 9:17
, 10:4 ,
10:9 , 10:13,
10:15 , 10:17
, 12:11 ,
12:16 , 13:10
, 13:20 ,
14:6 , 14:23
, 15:9 ,
15:24 , 16:3
, 16:6 ,
16:9 , 16:15
, 16:22 ,
16:24 , 17:3
, 17:11 ,
17:15 , 17:18
, 18:2 ,
25:21 , 26:1, 26:10 ,
31:12 , 31:14
, 31:16 ,
31:23 , 32:1
, 32:5
Berg [31] - 2:3, 2:4
, 1:8 , 3:6
, 5:19 ,
6:23 , 11:20
, 12:8 ,
13:1 , 13:4
, 16:2 ,
19:3 , 19:15
, 19:24 ,
20:4 , 20:5
, 21:2 ,
21:10 , 22:8, 22:10 ,
22:18 , 23:9
, 23:12 ,
24:13 , 26:9
, 27:8 ,
27:9 , 27:13
, 27:16 ,
31:7 , 31:18
berg [2] - 2:6
, 11:15
berg's [1] -
18:24
Berg's [2] -
15:14 , 15:15
best [1] -
32:20
big [1] - 5:23
Bill [1] - 29:11
[email protected] [1] -
2:14
bit [1] - 4:20
Blvd [1] - 2:16
board [12] -
11:19 , 13:4
, 13:22 ,
14:14 , 18:20
, 18:21 ,
19:2 , 19:15
, 19:25 ,
21:19 , 22:23
, 24:19
boards [1] -
23:25
bounds [1] -
8:20
boy [1] - 20:11
Bradley [1] - 2:15
Brand [1] - 2:16
brazen [1] -
15:14
Bredahl [1] -
30:2
brief[1] -25:21
bring [1] -
32:16
Brisbois [1] -
1:12
brought [2] -
2:6 , 23:5
business [1] -
4:14
C
CA [3] - 2:9, 2:13,
2:16
California [7] -
3:1 , 3:21
, 3:24 ,4:1 , 5:15
, 13:2 ,
21:17
CALIFORNIA [3] -
1:2, 1:17 , 1:1
cannot [2] -
15:18 , 19:11
careful [2] -
23:20 , 23:24
case [26] -
2:22 , 12:3
, 12:24 ,
13:2 , 14:11
, 14:25 ,
15:24 , 16:2
, 16:3 ,
19:5 , 21:10
, 21:21 ,
22:25 , 23:2
, 23:21 ,
26:18 , 28:22
, 28:23 ,
29:16 , 31:1
, 31:6 ,
31:8 , 32:15
, 32:21
cases [1] -
5:23
caused [1] -21:25
causes [1] -
29:21
CENTRAL [1] - 1:2
certificate [1] - 33:7
certify [1] - 33:8
chance [1] -
3:14
charged [1] - 33:11
charges [1] -
19:24
CHARLES [1] - 1:6
Charles [3] - 1:3
, 1:9 ,2:25
check [5] - 6:5
, 10:19 ,
13:5 , 13:21
, 30:17
CHEMICAL [1] - 1:13
Chemical [3] - 1:3
, 1:7 ,
26:15
chief[1] -
25:13
circuit [1] - 33:11
claim [6] - 2:9
, 2:13 ,
2:19 , 2:22
, 3:8 ,
29:18claiming [1] -
21:14
claims [1] -
2:7
clear[1] - 16:7
clearly [1] -
3:9
CLERK [5] -
1:2 , 1:18
, 30:3 ,
30:11 , 30:14
client [8] -
17:13 , 22:24
, 23:5 ,23:10 , 24:14
, 24:23 ,
27:4
clients [3] -
15:15 , 17:16
, 26:25
closed [1] -
9:25
CMRS [2] - 1:24,
33:14
coming [2] -
19:23 , 21:2
committed [1]
- 23:4
committing [1]
- 22:20
communication [3]
- 7:3 ,
7:8 , 8:10
complaint [16]
- 2:20 , 3:7
, 3:10 ,
3:18 , 3:22
, 5:2 , 5:5
, 5:14 ,
5:20 , 19:6
, 22:15 ,
29:13 , 32:22
, 32:24complete [1] -
24:9
completely [1]
- 24:9
conceding [2]
- 16:19 , 20:8
concern [2] -
17:19 , 26:24
concerned [1]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
022811 DCCD GUILFORD 10D LINCOLN
2
- 28:1
concurring [1]
- 22:21
conduct [3] -
15:18 , 21:24
, 30:19
conference [11]
- 2:1 ,10:8 , 12:10
, 26:17 ,
28:13 , 29:4
, 29:6 ,
30:9 , 30:24
, 30:25, 33:13
confidential [1]
- 13:25
conformance [1] -
33:12
confused [1] -
24:15
conscience [1]
- 15:18
consider[5] -
8:10 , 8:16
, 13:18 ,
14:4 , 28:10
consideration [1]
- 14:20
considered [1]
- 8:9
considering [1]
- 26:16
Constitution [1]
- 9:22
contempt [1] -
25:4
content [1] -
10:10
continue [1] -
2:4
continued [4]
- 7:22 , 21:12
, 27:17 ,
27:22
continuous [1]
- 15:14
conveyed [2] -
13:21 , 14:15
convicted [4]
- 19:9 , 21:3
, 21:12 ,21:23
convictions [1]
- 23:7
coordinator[1]
- 18:21
copies [1] -
1:19
copy [3] -
11:22 , 19:6
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
38/44
correct [4] -
9:13 , 22:6
, 31:23, 33:9
Counsel [4] -
7:14 , 9:4
, 9:19 ,
28:13
couple [1] -1:21
COURT [107] - 1:1,
1:25 , 1:21
, 2:17 ,
3:3 , 4:4 ,
4:8 , 4:18
, 4:24 ,
5:3 , 5:13
, 5:16 ,
5:25 , 6:5
, 7:2 ,
7:12 , 7:24
, 8:1 , 8:8
, 8:14 ,
8:25 , 9:3
, 9:9 ,
9:11 , 9:14
, 9:18 ,
10:6 , 10:12
, 10:14 ,
10:16 , 10:21
, 11:6 ,
11:10 , 11:14
, 11:21 ,
12:4 , 12:7
, 12:15 ,
13:7 , 13:12
, 14:3 ,
14:19 , 15:6, 15:12 ,
16:1 , 16:5
, 16:7 ,
16:10 , 16:16
, 16:23 ,
16:25 , 17:9
, 17:13 ,
17:16 , 17:19
, 18:3 ,
18:11 , 18:17
, 19:10 ,
19:17 , 20:7
, 20:11 ,
20:16 , 20:22, 21:5 ,
22:3 , 22:8
, 22:12 ,
22:17 , 23:3
, 23:12 ,
23:17 , 24:8
, 24:15 ,
24:21 , 24:25
, 25:5 ,
25:8 , 25:11
, 25:15 ,
25:25 , 26:2
, 26:11 ,
26:16 , 27:3
, 27:6 ,
27:9 , 27:19
, 27:23 ,
28:8 , 28:25, 29:3 ,
29:14 , 29:16
, 29:20 ,
29:25 , 30:4
, 30:12 ,
30:15 , 31:13
, 31:15 ,
31:17 , 31:24
, 32:3 ,
32:7 , 32:13
, 33:4
court [47] -
1:14 , 2:8
, 2:9 ,
2:18 , 3:20
, 5:12 ,
6:12 , 6:14
, 7:17 ,
9:25 , 11:3
, 11:10 ,
11:18 , 11:20
, 13:2 ,
14:5 , 14:6
, 14:16 ,
14:24 , 15:5
, 15:13 ,
15:15 , 15:17
, 17:14 ,
17:17 , 18:7, 18:11 ,
20:5 , 20:15
, 21:5 ,
21:25 , 22:3
, 23:20 ,
24:1 , 24:3
, 24:24 ,
25:4 , 25:16
, 25:17 ,
26:7 , 26:20
, 26:23 ,
27:1 , 27:25
, 31:2
Court[4]
- 2:4
,18:10 , 19:16
, 19:22
courtroom [2]
- 10:1 , 30:24
COURTROOM [1] -
1:4
courts [4] -
6:2 , 6:18
, 6:19 ,
9:22
CR [1] - 2:2
create [1] -
7:20
creates [1] -
7:21
CRR [2] - 1:24, 33:14
CSR [2] - 1:24, 33:14Ctr[1] - 2:12
cutoff[1] -
30:13
D
DAILY [1] - 1:17
damages [1] -
22:1
data [1] -
12:12
date [9] - 2:1
, 29:1 ,
29:5 , 29:6
, 31:10 ,
32:9 , 32:16
, 32:20 ,
32:23
DATE [1] - 33:14
dates [3] -
30:16 , 30:18
, 30:21
Daylight [3] - 1:3
, 1:7 ,
26:15
DAYLIGHT [1] - 1:13
days [4] - 6:2
, 29:19 ,29:23 , 30:7
DCCD [1] - 2:2
deal [2] - 5:6
, 24:4
deals [2] -
8:20 , 8:23
decades [1] -
16:11
December[2]
- 30:14 , 30:15
decisions [1] -
22:4
declined [2] -
24:14 , 24:18DEFENDANT [1] -
2:8
defendant [1]
- 26:12
Defendant [1]
- 26:14
Defendant(s) [1] -
1:15
defendants [1]
- 27:6
Defendants [1]
- 1:6
defense [5] -
3:3 , 3:8 ,
18:4 , 29:7
defrauded [1]
- 23:1defrauding [1]
- 22:25
DENISE [2] - 1:24,
33:14
Dentistry [1] -
3:16
deny [2] -
20:17 , 20:20
denying [1] -
23:18
department [2]
- 1:16 ,
19:20
deposit [1] - 33:12describe [1] -
9:14
despite [1] -
16:8
determination [1]
- 6:11
determinations [1]
- 2:2
determining [2]
- 13:8 ,
26:18
developed [1]
- 7:10
different [2] -
7:18 , 13:14
difficult [2] -
26:20 , 29:23
directed [1] -
12:14
directing [1] -
8:1
directly [1] -
1:15
disciplinary [22]
- 8:23 ,
9:1 , 9:5 ,
11:4 , 11:19
, 13:3 ,
13:22 , 14:14
, 15:1 ,
16:20 , 18:20
, 19:2 ,
19:15 , 19:25
, 20:6 ,
20:9 , 21:19
, 22:15 ,
22:23 , 23:13
, 23:25 ,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
022811 DCCD GUILFORD 10D LINCOLN
3
24:19
discipline [1] -
11:23
discovery [1] -
30:13
discuss [4] -
31:1 , 31:3
, 31:7 ,31:9
discussing [1]
- 13:13
discussions [1]
- 31:5
dismiss [6] -
2:6 , 2:21
, 5:22 ,
27:1 , 32:14
, 32:17
dismissed [2]
- 22:25 , 28:22
disrespect [1]
- 15:14distress [1] -
22:1
DISTRICT [3] - 1:1,
1:2, 1:25
District [2] -
16:2 , 25:14
district [2] -
6:2 , 13:2
diversity [17] -
2:24 , 3:1
, 3:4 , 3:7
, 3:8 ,
3:12 , 3:17
, 4:5 , 4:8
, 4:19 ,
4:21 , 4:22
, 5:6 ,
5:17 , 6:6
, 6:7 , 6:9
divert [1] -
15:16
docket [1] -
10:19
document [7]
- 14:11 , 19:9
, 19:11 ,
21:3 , 22:21
, 25:23 ,
26:8document's [1]
- 3:24
documents [11]
- 10:2 ,
13:23 , 13:25
, 14:4 ,
21:6 , 21:13
, 22:9 ,
23:10 , 25:24
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
39/44
, 26:19 ,
26:21
dollars [1] -
4:3
done [6] - 7:22
, 10:16 ,
19:8 , 22:18
, 24:1 ,30:22
doors [1] -
9:25
down [1] -
30:10
Dr[1] - 2:8
dr_taitz@yahoo.
com [1] - 2:10
during [1] -
5:15
E
e-mail [1] -
1:18
e-mailed [1] -
19:6
early [1] - 6:11
Eastern [1] -
16:2
EDWARD [1] - 1:6
Edward [1] - 1:3
efficiency [1] -
32:19
either[1] -
3:18
electronically [1]
- 1:15eligible [1] -
18:7
Email [4] - 2:6, 2:10,
2:14, 2:18
emergency [3]
- 27:18 , 27:22
, 28:4
emotional [1]
- 22:1
encourage [1]
- 26:10
End [1] - 33:5
enforce [1] -
25:16enforcement [1]
- 25:15
engage [1] -
1:25
enormous [1]
- 22:1
ET [1] - 1:13
et [1] - 1:4
evidence [4] -
3:20 , 4:25
, 19:23 ,
20:3
ex [4] - 7:3
, 7:8 ,
8:10 , 8:20
exactly [1] -
20:23excerpt [1] -
12:18
exist [1] -
25:22
existence [4] -
8:25 , 9:5
, 9:6 ,
9:12
experience [1]
- 27:7
experienced [1]
- 21:2
explanation [2]
- 20:12
,20:13
extend [1] -
25:12
extern [3] -
31:21 , 31:24
, 32:4
extremely [2] -
10:2 , 32:15
F
facing [1] -
3:12
fact [8] - 9:15, 12:21 ,
18:21 , 20:21
, 28:2 ,
28:6 , 28:11
, 30:20
facts [1] -
25:22
failure [1] -
3:11
fair[1] - 29:25
fairness [1] -
32:20
familiar[1] -
30:21Fax [2] - 2:6, 2:17
February [4] -
6:23 , 8:2
, 30:11 ,
30:12
FEBRUARY [2] -
1:18 , 1:1
federal [11] -
2:4 , 2:8 ,
2:9 , 2:14
, 5:11 ,
6:14 , 6:16
, 13:1 ,
20:15 , 31:21
, 32:3
federalist [1] -
6:17fee [1] - 33:12
fees [1] - 33:11
felony [1] -
23:7
feud [1] -
13:15
few [1] - 16:18
file [17] - 2:19
, 3:23 ,
4:12 , 4:15
, 5:11 ,
7:6 , 8:11
, 8:15 ,
12:14 , 12:16
, 19:20 ,
19:21 , 21:18
, 23:1 ,
25:8 , 26:23
, 28:7
filed [28] -
1:15 , 3:21
, 3:25 ,
6:23 , 7:6
, 7:19 ,
8:7 , 8:18
, 10:11 ,
10:23 , 12:4
, 12:23 ,
13:1 , 14:8
, 14:11 ,
21:10 , 22:8
, 22:10 ,
22:15 , 22:22
, 23:8 ,
23:10 , 25:3
, 25:7 ,
26:7 , 26:25
, 28:24
filing [14] - 4:6
, 4:13 ,
4:16 , 5:10
, 5:20 ,
7:10 , 7:13, 10:18 ,
14:17 , 21:12
, 27:17 ,
27:22 , 27:25
, 28:3
filings [4] -
21:10 , 26:3
, 27:14 ,
28:10
fill [1] - 30:16
final [1] -
17:11
financial [1] -
22:1
fine [1] - 17:16
finish [1] -
27:11firm [1] - 22:4
first [6] - 3:18
, 5:4 ,
5:21 , 12:13
, 26:22
First [2] - 9:21
, 23:21
fitting [1] - 4:9
five [3] - 28:18
, 29:19 ,
29:22
Floor[2] - 2:12, 2:16
focus [4] - 5:7
, 10:7 ,22:17
focusing [2] -
13:16 , 18:4
folks [4] -
13:14 , 23:13
, 23:25 ,
28:14
following [1] -
16:20
Ford [1] - 2:12
foregoing [1] - 33:8
forged [2] -
21:12 , 25:24
forger[5] -
19:9 , 19:11
, 21:3 ,
22:21 , 23:6
forgery [2] -
21:24 , 23:7
forging [1] -
21:6
forth [2] - 3:9
, 3:11
forward [2] -
9:16 , 19:20
forwarded [1]
- 19:21
frankly [1] -
17:19
fraudulent [1]
- 22:9
Friday [2] -
7:15 , 12:12
frivolous [1] -
4:16
front [2] -
30:16 , 32:1
full [1] - 10:10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
022811 DCCD GUILFORD 10D LINCOLN
4
future [1] -
28:10
G
gathering [1] -
24:2
Glen [1] - 2:4
Glendale [1] - 2:16
Gmelich [1] - 2:15
Google [1] -
5:25
government [1]
- 11:9
grant [5] -
14:24 , 20:5
, 20:18 ,
24:14 , 24:18
granted [8] -
2:7 , 17:21
, 24:12 ,
24:16 , 24:17
, 27:1 ,
28:6
granting [1] -
8:14
greatly [2] -
21:25
grown [1] -
15:13
guess [1] -
16:24
GUILFORD [2] - 1:4,
2:2
guilt [1] - 22:6
guilty [3] -17:5 , 17:22
, 21:6
H
hac [26] - 1:9
, 1:24 ,
6:21 , 10:7
, 12:5 ,
12:10 , 13:1
, 13:8 ,
13:16 , 14:22
, 14:25 ,
17:21 , 17:25
, 18:4 ,
19:4 , 20:5
, 20:8 ,
20:20 , 20:25
, 24:6 ,
24:11 , 24:12
, 24:16 ,
25:19 , 31:19
, 32:8
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
40/44
Haggerty [7] - 2:11,
2:12 , 1:11
, 29:11 ,
32:12 , 32:13
, 32:14
HAGGERTY [7]
- 1:11 ,
25:20 , 29:9, 29:15 ,
29:17 , 29:21
, 32:12
half[2] - 15:4
, 19:8
hard [1] -
10:22
head [2] - 9:2
, 9:3
hear[4] - 6:9
, 11:13 ,
20:18 , 20:22
heard [1] -
7:12
hearing [17] -
7:15 , 7:17
, 9:9 ,
11:4 , 11:19
, 12:21 ,
13:4 , 17:6
, 17:7 ,
18:22 , 19:2
, 19:17 ,
20:2 , 20:9
, 20:18 ,
24:18 , 32:18
hearings [1] -
7:18
heed [1] - 7:4
helping [1] -
4:21
hereby [1] - 33:8
Hill [1] - 2:5
hired [1] -
22:18
hires [1] -
19:11
history [1] -
21:9
hits [1] - 6:1
hold [2] -
27:10
Holsworth [1] - 16:1
home [1] -
19:12
honest [1] -
3:5
Honor[37] -
1:5 , 1:10
, 1:11 ,
2:16 , 2:21
, 2:24 ,
6:3 , 7:1 ,
7:9 , 10:4
, 10:20 ,
11:18 , 12:19
, 12:23 ,
13:6 , 13:10
, 13:23 ,14:16 , 15:4
, 15:25 ,
16:4 , 16:8
, 16:9 ,
16:10 , 18:15
, 20:10 ,
21:9 , 25:20
, 26:13 ,
26:24 , 28:21
, 29:10 ,
29:23 , 31:12
, 32:2 ,
32:11 , 33:2
honor[1] -
17:11
HONORABLE [1] -
1:4
honorable [1]
- 20:5
I
idea [3] - 21:1
, 27:3 ,
27:4
III [2] - 1:6, 1:3
important [2] -
11:11 , 32:7impose [2] -
28:9 , 28:12
imposed [1] -
15:8
impression [1]
- 9:24
INC [1] - 1:13
Inc [1] - 1:4
inclined [2] -
9:23 , 10:1
including [2] -
15:15 , 26:19
indeed [1] -
22:23individual [2]
- 19:7 , 29:12
information [6]
- 4:20 ,
11:4 , 11:19
, 12:5 ,
23:5 , 24:2
Information [2] - 1:3
, 1:7
INFORMATION [1] -
1:13
initial [1] -
28:15
innocent [2] -
17:5 , 17:22
inquiry [1] -
14:16instant [1] -
15:16
Internet [3] -
14:9 , 14:12
, 23:22
interrupt [1] -
12:8
introduce [1] -
3:14
involved [1] -
31:9
Iqbal/Twombly [1]
- 5:25
issue [9] -5:21 , 6:6
, 6:7 , 6:9
, 8:3 ,
10:24 , 16:17
, 24:5 ,
28:7
issued [5] -
15:22 , 18:8
, 18:14 ,
24:13 , 26:6
issues [2] -
3:12 , 5:4
Item [1] - 1:2
items [1] -
1:21
J
ob [2] - 4:14
, 21:7
Jonathan [3] - 2:15
, 1:6 ,
26:14
ross@bglawyers.
com [1] - 2:18
JUDGE [1] - 1:4
Judge [2] -
1:19 , 31:24udge [8] -
12:24 , 13:2
, 15:22 ,
16:11 , 19:5
, 25:14 ,
28:5 , 32:4
udges [1] -
31:21
udicial [2] -
15:17, 33:13
urisdiction [7]
- 2:14 ,
3:2 , 3:4 ,
5:21 , 6:15
, 6:16 ,
28:7
ury [2] - 28:17, 30:8
K
keep [1] -
26:20
kept [1] - 23:2
kind [1] - 3:8
kinds [1] - 2:1
knows [1] -
14:13
L
Lafayette [1] - 2:5
large [1] -
32:22
last [8] - 2:11
, 2:23 ,
3:21 , 4:20
, 6:4 ,
12:12 , 19:8
late [1] - 12:13
law [3] - 6:15
, 6:17 ,
15:3
Law [4] - 2:4, 2:8, 1:13 ,
29:11
lawsuits [5] -
4:7 , 4:12
, 4:13 ,
4:16 , 5:10
least [1] -
32:19
leave [7] - 2:8
, 17:10 ,
26:7 , 26:22
, 27:25 ,
31:1 , 31:6
leaves [1] -
9:24
leeway [2] -
4:10 , 4:18
left [2] - 6:3
, 26:19
legal [2] - 3:25
, 15:20
legitimate [1]
- 15:17
less [2] -
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
022811 DCCD GUILFORD 10D LINCOLN
5
29:18, 33:11
letter[13] -
6:23 , 6:25
, 7:2 , 7:4
, 7:5 , 8:2
, 8:9 ,
8:20 , 9:15
, 10:3 ,10:10 , 10:12
, 12:19
letters [3] -
27:18 , 27:22
, 28:4
level [1] - 21:1
Lewis [1] -
1:12
Liberi [2] -
11:25 , 21:3
light [1] - 8:6
likelihood [2]
- 2:4 , 2:17
Lincoln[9]
- 1:3, 1:9 ,
2:25 , 3:20
, 4:2 ,
24:23 , 25:4
, 25:13 ,
31:21
LINCOLN [2] - 1:6,
2:2
Lisa [2] -
11:25 , 21:3
listen [1] -
20:13
listening [1] -
27:12
litigation [1] -
30:19
live [1] - 21:15
living [1] -
4:25
look [4] - 5:20
, 5:21 ,
6:7 , 32:24
lost [1] - 5:6
lot [1] - 22:1
lots [1] - 28:14
lying [1] - 23:2
M
made [5] -
3:11 , 6:19
, 7:4 ,
14:3 , 27:20
mail [1] - 1:18
mailed [1] -
19:6
main [2] - 4:6
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
41/44
, 4:13
major[1] -
7:10
malice [1] -
21:2
malicious [1] -
2:13
MARCE [1] -12:25
Marcee [1] -
12:25
March [6] -
20:2 , 21:4
, 29:8 ,
30:2 , 30:5
, 31:15
Mare [1] -
12:25
MARE [1] -
12:25
materials [2] -
14:7 , 14:8matter[14] -
8:6 , 8:20
, 8:21 ,
8:22 , 11:10
, 15:2 ,
15:5 , 16:20
, 18:21 ,
28:2 , 28:6
, 31:18, 33:10
matters [4] -
6:18 , 12:9
, 15:17 ,
28:15
mean [2] -
15:21 , 25:23
meant [1] -
31:15
mediator[2] -
31:3 , 31:9
meeting [1] -
11:9
member[1] -
18:6
memory [1] -
3:6
meruit [2] -
27:2 , 29:18
Mexico [1] -
21:18microphone [1]
- 11:14
might [9] - 6:9
, 7:14 ,
16:11 , 18:18
, 19:24 ,
20:19 , 29:22
, 31:8 ,
31:9
million [2] -
4:3 , 13:14
mind [1] - 6:20
misconduct [1]
- 21:21
Mission [1] - 2:9
misstatements [1]
- 24:3moment [2] -
4:11 , 8:18
moments [1] -
16:19
Monday [2] -
7:17 , 30:3
MONDAY [2] - 1:18
, 1:1
morning [8] -
1:5 , 7:11
, 7:17 ,
8:7 , 8:18
, 10:18 ,
26:4 , 26:20most [2] - 19:7
, 27:12
motion [21] -
2:6 , 2:7 ,
2:21 , 5:22
, 10:7 ,
12:5 , 12:10
, 14:22 ,
14:23 , 15:16
, 23:1 ,
25:3 , 25:5
, 25:11 ,
25:19 , 26:4
, 26:5 ,
26:25 , 27:1
, 32:14 ,
32:17
motions [1] -
32:25
move [2] -
32:15 , 32:23
moving [1] -
28:16
MR [62] - 1:5
, 1:8 ,
1:11 , 2:15
, 2:19 ,
5:24 , 6:3
, 7:1 , 7:9, 7:21 ,
7:25 , 8:6
, 8:13 ,
8:17 , 9:7
, 9:10 ,
9:13 , 9:17
, 10:4 ,
10:9 , 10:13,
10:15 , 10:17
, 12:11 ,
12:16 , 13:10
, 13:20 ,
14:6 , 14:23
, 15:9 ,
15:24 , 16:3
, 16:6 ,
16:9 , 16:15, 16:22 ,
16:24 , 17:3
, 17:11 ,
17:15 , 17:18
, 18:2 ,
25:20 , 25:21
, 26:1 ,
26:10 , 26:13
, 26:24 ,
27:4 , 27:21
, 29:9 ,
29:15 , 29:17
, 29:21 ,
31:12 , 31:14
, 31:16 ,
31:23 , 32:1
, 32:5 ,
32:11 , 32:12
MS [43] - 3:14
, 4:6 ,
4:10 , 4:22
, 5:2 , 5:8
, 5:14 ,
9:2 , 10:25
, 11:8 ,
11:12 , 11:16
, 11:22 ,
12:6 , 18:9
, 18:15 ,18:18 , 19:14
, 19:19 ,
20:10 , 20:14
, 20:19 ,
21:1 , 21:8
, 22:7 ,
22:10 , 22:14
, 22:19 ,
23:4 , 23:16
, 24:7 ,
24:12 , 24:17
, 24:23 ,
25:3 , 25:7
, 25:9 ,
25:12 , 27:7
, 27:16 ,
28:1 , 28:21
, 29:2
must [2] - 2:12
, 26:22
N
name [1] -
19:9
narrowing [1]
- 32:24
nearly [1] - 4:2need [8] - 9:3
, 11:3 ,
12:7 , 13:13
, 17:16 ,
24:25 , 26:7
, 29:2
needs [2] -
4:22 , 4:23
never[1] -
21:7
New [1] -
21:18
next [2] -
10:17 , 13:19
nice [1] -
20:11
normal [1] -
1:25
notation [1] -
19:21
nothing [3] -
2:13 , 4:24
, 20:9
notice [1] -
24:13
numerous [2]
- 3:25 , 31:21
O
oath [1] -
14:13
obtained [1] -
27:25
occasionally [1]
- 27:12
occupation [5]
- 4:6 ,
4:13 , 4:16
, 5:9 ,
5:10
office[6]
-1:20 , 3:20
, 3:23 ,
21:14 , 21:20
, 23:9
Offices [4] - 2:4, 2:8
, 1:13 ,
29:11
often [1] -
29:16
once [1] - 9:7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
022811 DCCD GUILFORD 10D LINCOLN
6
one [5] - 20:19
, 25:3 ,
26:25 , 27:1
, 28:3
ongoing [2] -
7:22 , 21:24
open [4] - 10:1
, 18:19 ,18:23 , 18:24
oppose [3] -
27:3 , 27:4
, 27:7
opposition [2]
- 20:8 , 22:4
order[18] -
3:23 , 12:11
, 15:10 ,
16:8 , 18:8
, 18:14 ,
26:6 , 26:22
, 27:10 ,
27:13 , 28:9
, 28:10 ,
28:12 , 29:5
, 30:17 ,
30:20 , 30:21
, 30:25
ordered [1] -
25:4
ordering [1] -
31:7
orders [4] -
11:17 , 15:7
, 18:5 ,
25:16
original [2] -
3:7 , 26:25
Orly [11] - 2:8, 2:8
, 1:12 ,
1:13 , 3:15
, 7:11 ,
7:22 , 8:19
, 10:19 ,
29:11 , 29:12
outside [1] -
27:1
overstated [1]
- 10:19
overstepped [2]
- 8:19 ,
12:20own [4] - 5:2
, 15:15 ,
25:16
P
PA [1] - 2:5
PADDOCK [2] - 1:24,
-
8/7/2019 LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING 022811 - Dccd Guilford 10d Lincoln.pdf - Merged
42/44
33:14
page [2] - 7:23
, 30:16
papers [6] -
10:21 , 13:8
, 13:17 ,
18:5 , 19:4
, 24:8paralegal [2] -
11:25 , 12:1
parallels [1] -
30:1
part [10] - 9:7
, 10:17 ,
11:24 , 12:20
, 12:21 ,
12:24 , 13:10
, 13:11 ,
14:1 , 17:19
parte [4] - 7:3
, 7:8 ,
8:10 , 8:20
particular [1] -
20:1
particularly [1]
- 23:24
parties [7] -
11:3 , 23:19
, 26:6 ,
28:20 , 30:25
, 31:7 ,
33:1
party [2] -
31:3 , 31:9
pay [1] - 7:4
paying [1] -
6:2
Paz [1] - 2:9
pending [3] -
1: