Download - Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
1/157
Space for creativityA Cultural Citique on Conditions of Creativity within Vietnamese schools
Participants of The Creative Kid Project
In Partial fulfillment for the degree of
Bachelor of Arts in Development Studies
Brown University
April 15, 2013
by LINH DAO
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
2/157
First Reader
JENNIFER LINDSAY
Second Reader
JENNIFER COSTANZA
Abstract
Grappling with the problem of ineffective education, this study asks what "creativity"means and how it plays out in the context of Vietnamese schools. Given the cultural and
institutional specificities of the Vietnamese education system, it also asks if a creativity-fostering
education within this system is desirable and attainable. As creativity has traditionally been afocus of Western scholars, this study challenges the notion of the universalization of creativity
and brings nuances to the relationship between students' expression of creativity and their
learning environment, in the context of Vietnam. While the first stage of this study seeks to
answer the question "Are Vietnamese students creative", the second stage seeks to answer thequestions "what explains the differences in student creativity?" and specifically "under what
conditions, or what kind of learning environments, does student creativity flourish?" Results
from Vietnamese students of different educational backgrounds, especially of those from two
middle schools with distinct educational models, provide interesting answers to these questions.Vietnamese students show potentials and traits of creativity; yet the reason for their creativity
and the space where they express their creativity are different from what previous scholarship on
creativity suggests.
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
3/157i
Acknowledgement
My fieldwork for this thesis would not have been possible without my team from theCreative Kid Project 2012, including Trang Nguyen, Suong Tran, Viet Vu, Ly Nguyen, and
many more. Special thanks to Evan Schwartz for being the first person that helped me organize
CKP. Thank you for having encouraged me in many ways to pursue this followup thesis.
I am also deeply indebted to my thesis advisor, Jennifer Lindsay. Thank you for your
patience, power in softness, and words of wisdom. Thank you for having agreed to go on this
journey with me on top of your other commitments, and always reminding me to connect thedots and think about the bigger picture.
Special thanks to Jennifer Costanza, who not only acted as my second advisor but who
has been a mentor to me for the past year. Thank you for your sharp critiques and incredibleinsights. Thank you for always pushing me to make me realize that I could push even harder.
Words cannot fully express my gratitude to Professor Jin Li, who is perhaps the mostimportant indirect contributor to my thesis. The work that you have done has inspired a great part
of this study. I am so lucky to have the opportunity to both learn from you and work with you.
An integral part of this thesis is the community of teachers, students, and parents fromTrung Vuong (Traditional) School and Thuc Nghiem (Experimental) School in Hanoi, Vietnam.
Special thanks to Tram, Phuong, and Mymy incrediblely helpful sisters from Trung Vuong. Iam also deeply honored by the support from Mrs. Quynh and all Thuc Nghiem staff. Thank youall for welcoming me into your classrooms and considering me part of your school days for the
entire month of January 2013.
I am also grateful for my roommate, Phan Ha, who has accompanied with me all the wayduring this process. Your willingness to listen and share, your encouragement at moments when I
need it the most, and above all your passion for education and equality have inspired and given
me the power to follow through.
I cannot say thank enough to everyone who has helped me editing and proofreading this
thesis, especially the fellows from Brown University Writing Center. More than just correctingmy grammar and writing, you all have helped me sharpen and realize my own arguments during
the several iterations of this thesis.
Thanks also to my brother, Kien, who is now preparing for his most important exam thusfar in his school yearsthe exntrance exam to high school. From you, I am constantly remindedof why I started CKP and this thesis project in the first place.
Finally, thank to my parents, bo Trung & me Hoa, for making me the person I am today.From my father, I learn the values of being spontaneous, passionate and whole-hearted. From my
mother, I learn the importance of being thoughtful, down-to-earth and considerate. Your love and
support have shown me firsthand why I am here and why my effort matters. I love you with allmy heart.
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
4/157ii
Tables, Charts and Pictures34 Table 2.1: Overall of Methods used
35 Table 2.2: Breakdown of Classroom Observations37 Table 2.3: Breakdown of Students Surveys38 Table 2.4: Breakdown ofStudents Interviews
39 Table 2.5: Breakdown of Teachers Interviews47 Table 3.1: Profile of CKP Candidates48 Table 3.2: School Profile of CKP Candidates
51 Chart 3.1: School-based Breakdown of Passive & Balanced Learning
51 Chart 3.2: Cross-school Comparison of Passive & Balanced Learning52 Table 3.3: Age Compositions of different Middle Schools
53 Table 3.4: Age-based analysis of Passive & Balanced Learning
Chart 3.3: Age-based Comparison of Passive & Balanced Learning
55 Table 3.5: Five components of Creativity among CKP candidates56 Table 3.6: Percentage of Students with Different Creativity Traits
57 Table 3.7: Creativity Assessment of CKP Candidates
57 Chart 3.4: Creativity Scores of CKP Candidates58 Table 3.8: School-based Assessment of Creativity for CKP Candidates
58 Chart 3.5: Cross-school Comparison of Creativity Level
59 Chart 3.6: School-based Assessment of Creativity
60 Table 3.9: Inter-school Comparison of age-based Creativity Score79 Chart 4.1: Frequency of Performance-related concerns among Students and
Teachers in each school
81 Table 4.1: Level of Engagement in Classroom Activities as expressed by Studentsand Teachers in each school
83 Chart 4.2: Frequency of Workload-management Concerns among Students in each
school
87 Table 4.2: Basic characteristics of Traditional School and Experimental School asof 2013
88 Picture 4.1: Experimental School Teacher attended to a student in class
89 Picture 4.2: Traditional School Teacher lectured to a big classroom94 Table 4.3: Mapping School characteristics onto Urbans framework of open-
learning environment and Cropeleys Blocks to Creativity95 Table 4.4: Five components of Creativity among students from both schools96 Table 4.5: Breakdown of Different Levels of Creativity expressed by students in
both schools
97 Chart 4.3: Breakdown of Different Levels of Creativity expressed by students in
both Schools98 Table 4.4: Level of Creativity based on Class Type and Age
99 Table 4.5: Comparable Interviews from the two schools
117 Chart 5.1: Diagrams for Mind-Oriented Learning Processes in the West and
Virtue-Oriented Learning Processes in the East119 Chart 5.2: Breakdown of Classroom Activities by students from both Schools
119 Chart 5.3: Breakdown of Classroom Activities by students from each school
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
5/157iii
Table of Contenti. Acknowledgements
ii. Graphs, Tables & Charts1 Chapter 1: Introduction2 Overview
4 Why Vietnam?6 A note on Personal Motivations7 The Quest for Creativity (Literature Review)
8
19Creativity in Western Scholarship
Culturally Relevant Framework for Creativity24 Theoretical Propositions25 Limitations
26 Thesis Structure
29 Chapter 2: Methodological Considerations30 Stage 1The Immersion: Are Vietnamese students creative?31 Stage 2The Investigation: How does learning environment influence creativity?
3233
41
Case study: Experimental School and Traditional SchoolTriangulation of Methods
A note on reflexivity44 Chapter 3: Exploring students voice through a student-centered initiative47 Tell me about your dream school!
49 Passive Learning and Balanced Learning
55 Assessing creativity60 Only an age difference?
63 Chapter 4: Tales of the two schools66 Part 1: History
67
69
Experimental SchoolAn ideal and its limits
Traditional Schoolthe leading institution72 Part 2: Learning Environment
74
83
8790
The Performance-driven disease
Core-Subjects and Periphery Subjects
Big, diluted classrooms versus small, focused classrooms
Focus on Excellence and Focus on Equality
95 Part 3: Facets of Creativity108 Chapter 5: Conclusion110
111
112
The Stake
The Expectation
Reality Check
114 Culturally Relevant Framework Revisited121 Implications of Findings123 Suggestions for Future Research
124 Final Thoughts: Vietnamese Education and the Creative Kid Project
iv. Appendixxxii. Bibliography
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
6/1571
CHAPTER ONE: Introduction
Starting to study abroad at the early age of 16 was hard for meI knew that I was going
to miss my then 8-year-old brother Kien. So whenever I went back to Vietnam in the summer, I
made a conscious effort to reconnect with Kien.
It was a scorching summer day in 2011. Kien came home at around 8p.m, throwing his
backpack on the couch where I was sitting. He seemed both aloof and exhausted.
Whats up? I asked him. Just came back from Math class.He answered. Every
Wednesday, Kien had to take extra tutoring in Math, like most of his peers.
How was it? Boring, as usual. In a matter-of-fact voice, Kien responded while
quickly turning to his iPhone. Our chat stopped there, for Kien was uninterested in elaborating
on why.
Kiens answer to me was a moment of dj vu, reminding me exactly of how I was, 8
years earlier, at his age! Back then, I also thought school was boring, but I could not care less.
Just like Kien, I was disengaged and uninterested in doing anything about it.
But the very fact that I was so concerned about Kiens response signaled that I had
changed somehow along the way. During the years abroad, not only was I told that my opinion
mattered, that being engaged in ones own education was important, but I also got to see how
fun and relevant school could be, and how much I could do about it. I wish I could travel back in
time to tell myself of 8 years earlier, just as much as I wanted to tell that to Kien.
I quickly grabbed a pen and a piece of paper, and started writing down my initial
reflections: Kids are creative by nature; but they need to be able to see that their opinion
matters, in orderfor their creativity to flourish.1
1This later serves as the Creative Kid Projects first mission statement.
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
7/1572
Overview
This study grapples with the problem of ineffective education. All around the world, an
incredible amount of time, energy and potential are wasted in classrooms filled with bored
students and frustrated teachers (Wagner, 2008). Beyond formal classes, for many students in
some parts of the world, particularly in Asia, back-to-back formal classes followed by extra-
classes, also known as shadow education, is the norm (Bray, 1999).2
According to a recent
publication of a decade-long study on extra tutoring phenomenon in Vietnam, Dang (2008)
found that an increasing number of Vietnamese students spend up to 12 hoursper day running a
marathon from class to class: for these students, the average day starts at 6a.m and ends at
11p.m, leaving no breathing space for other activities.3
Policy makers are increasingly aware of these problems. In Vietnam, for example, the
Ministry of Education and Training (MOET) in their decadal report titled Education
Development Strategic Plan for 2011-2020 identified low employability competences of
students and graduates as the main weakness of the Vietnamese education system (Ministry of
Education & Training, 2012). Three pressing questions were asked: 1.What is the role of
vocational education versus traditional education? , 2. Should education be learner-centered or
teacher-centered?; and 3. How to educate the young in a globalized world? Answering these big
questions, the report concluded, would enable policy makers to solve the problem of Vietnamese
education (, 2012).
2 Extra classes, or formally known as shadow education, refers to the privatized teaching of main subjects either by
institutionalized businesses or individual teachers from or outside of students schools. In many developing andsome developed countries ranging from Brazil, Egypt to Japan, Singapore, or Tanzania, shadow education has
become one of the most pressing education concerns and in 1999 reached the UNICEFF reform agenda.3This is my attempt to translate the term chay sho, which means running show business in Vietnamese. Thisterm refers to the mindless act of running from class to class that most Vietnamese students go through in their
school life.
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
8/1573
Predominantly, many Western researchers have suggested that the answer for these
questions lies in focusing on creativity, for both normative as well as practical reasons.
Creativity, defined as the application of knowledge and skills in new ways to achieve a valued
goal empowers students, both as learners and future workers (Seltzer & Bentley, 1999, p. 10).
Researchers and some educators argue that not only is creativity an effective goal for pedagogy
but also a great economic imperative in the age of globalization. In fact, many authors even
claim that there is a trend towards the universalization of creativity: across all countries, schools
want more creative learners and employers want a more creative workforce (Kaufman &
Sternberg, 2006; Craft, Jefferey, & Leibling, 2001).
This current study, however, serves to challenge this argument: that is, it takes a look at
creativity, as conceptualized in Western scholarship, and examines whether a focus on this kind
of creativity could be an answer to the problem of ineffective education in Vietnam. Using
frameworks that stem from Western tradition in the specific context of Vietnam, this study
makes the case for why a more culturally relevant framework is necessary in researching
creativity in education.
I began by conducting exploratory research on participants of the Creative Kid Project
(CKP), an educational program I founded that embraces creativity at its core.4
By analyzing
students perceptions and aspirations on schooling, I sought to answer the first question: Are
Vietnamese students capable of being creative, and if yes, to what extent?
The second part of my research grapples with the why questions: What explain the
differences in Vietnamese student creativity? As CKP attracted students across different types of
schools in Vietnam, it opened an opportunity for me to expand my investigation beyond
participants of CKP to other Vietnamese students and their learning environments. As previous
4See CKPs mission statement in Appendix A. The opening vignette is the story of how CKP came about.
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
9/1574
scholars have suggested, learning environment, particularly classroom environment, turns out to
be an important determinant of student creativity, I further asked: Under what kind of learning
environments does a student creativity flourish? What characteristics of a learning environment
best explain differences in student creativity?
My main findings suggest that although Vietnamese students can be very creative, the
reason for their creativity and the channels through which some express creativity differ from
what previous scholarship suggests, and in some case even contradict it. Particularly, a perceived
more open learning environment that is creativity-fostering does not necessarily lead to more
creativity in students. Cultural norms and values seem to play a large role in students learningenvironment, their learning beliefs, and in turn, their decision to express their own creativity.
Why Vietnam?
This study assesses the value and expression of creativity in education in Vietnam, which
no other research has dealt with to this date. As explained further, research on creativity has been
heavily focusing on the West, particularly Great Britain and North America. Recently, in a
volume titled Creativity: When East Meets West, the first work in a whole range of research
on creativity that compiles non-Western studies on creativity, Lau et al. proposed that
theorization of creativity in the East is too lopsidedly dependent on Western concepts and
theories, hindering any breakthrough in theory building by scholars in the East (Lau, Hui, &
Ng, 2004, p. 6). However, these authors reached their conclusion from studies done mostly in
China and Chinese-speaking countries such as Singapore and Hong Kong. This current study, I
propose, sits at the nexus between the East and the West, as the case of Vietnam neither fits
perfectly the West or the East dichotomy.
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
10/1575
On one hand, Vietnam can be seen as a typical Eastern country with a heavily exam-
driven, teacher-centered and virtue-oriented educational system (Altbach & Kelly, 1978). The
1000-year period of Chinese domination, followed by unstable political periods until doimoi,
Vietnams major economic reform in 1986, left a legacy of a stagnant and change-averse
education. For the past few decades since doimoi, Vietnam has made tremendous progress in
some areas of education (such as primary education enrollment) yet dismal progress in others
(such as exams, textbooks and overall heavy curriculum). Each decade witnesses a "Total and
Fundamental Reform" (1982, 1991 and 2000 and 2011), yet many fundamental problems that
have led to the need for reform in the first place, such as curriculum overload, have not been
resolved (Le, 1991). As chapter 4 demonstrates, the exam-driven curriculum in many cases
serves as the root causes for many of the challenges facing students, teachers and the schools as a
whole in adopting more innovative pedagogy. But as Vietnam will pass another round of the
aforementioned reform; the Vietnamese Ministry of Education and Training is determined in
taking bold initiatives this time around to resolve the problem. This study looks at Vietnam at a
very timely period (London, 2011).
On the other hand, Vietnams education system is also complex and multifaceted in
nature. Besides Confucian tradition, Vietnam's education system consists of many features that
typify a "Western education" as a legacy of French colonialism and the Soviet sphere of
influence (World Bank, 2004). For example, written Vietnamese language is one of the few
Asian languages that use Latin script instead of Chinese characters or Sanskrit like most other
Asian languages. Moreover, as discussed further in chapter 4, one of the two schools that form
the focus of this study, Experimental School, was born out of a Western tradition of a child-
centered education popular in Soviet Russia during the 1980s. Likewise, the other school,
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
11/1576
Traditional School, was a project by French colonizers in the early 1930s as the first all-girls
school in Southeast Asia. Thus, Western influence has also been a running theme in Vietnamese
education.
The case of Vietnam, thus, adds richness and nuances not only to the discussion on
creativity in education but also to the role of culture in the practice of learning and teaching.
A note on personal motivations
This study is important to me, personally, as someone who has studied for eleven years in
the traditional public school system in Vietnam, two years in an English-speaking international
high school in India, and four years in an American university with a Liberal Arts education. My
exposure to different pedagogical systems with distinct styles yet many of the same problems,
such as ineffective teaching or unengaged learning, has encouraged me to always question,
compare and evaluate different educational models and approaches: What is in a good
education? What is the purpose of learning? Why should students care? As such, this study is my
attempt to search for a sense of motivation and interest in education that seem to have become
lost in so many students, myself included, throughout our schooling.
Furthermore, this study is also important to my own educational startup, the Creative Kid
Project. After initial conception during the summer of 2011, Creative Kid Project was founded in
the spring of 2012 (see opening vignette). With the mission to "inspire students to unleash their
creativity and make an impact in their community", CKP 2012 brought together 28 students from
various middle schools in Hanoi, Vietnam, to learn skills (such as critical thinking, problem-
solving and presentation skills), work in teams and build a project to improve their own schools.5
5 See Appendix A, CKP Information Packet, for more information
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
12/1577
At the end of CKP, six groups of students presented their proposals to parents, teachers and
school headmasters to voice their concerns about the problems in their schools.
In a way, this research would never have happened without CKP. Particularly, CKP
provided me with an opportunity to acquire initial data and subjects for my research.
Additionally, the two schools that I studied in chapter 4 are also the two with the largest number
of applications to CKP.6
By the same token CKP also benefited from the results of this research
because of its exclusive look at the problems of the Vietnamese education system, the main focus
of our program.
At the same time, it is important for me, both as a researcher as well as the founder of
CKP to separate these two projects. While CKP is an experimental program with creativity at its
core (that is, CKP by default adopts a pro-creativity framework), this research study is an
academic investigation that is intended to study creativity and challenge conventional notions of
what creativity entails. Ideally, regardless of my own personal belief on creativity, the CKP
framework should not influence the framework used in this study. In the following section, the
Quest for Creativity, I take the neutral stance of a researcher who wants to explore and learn
more about existing scholarship, as opposed to that of the founder of the Creative Kid Project. In
fact, the quest to dissect what creativity means and how it has been conceptualized as well as
executed forms the crux of this study, as I shall explain in the rest of this study.
The Quest for Creativity
The following section situates my thesis in the existing body of literature on creativity in
education. In the first part, I seek to find answers for my research questions from previous
6 The two schools are Trung Vuong (Traditional) Middle School and Thuc Nghiem (Experimental) Middle School.
For more information about these schools see chapter 4.
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
13/1578
scholarship. While many researchers have delved into this topic, I shall show that most of them
draw their main framing principles from Western philosophy of education, such as Deweys
concept of child-centered education, and most of the conclusions and suggestions are more
appropriate in a Western learning context. Nonetheless, existing theories are necessary for my
own understanding and helpful for my research. From them, I extrapolate a framework of
analysis to examine students expressions of creativity (Torrance), conditions for creativity
(Cropeley) and the criteria of open-learning environment (Urban). Although most of these
studies and frameworks do not answer my research questions regarding Vietnamese education,
they provide me with general trends and predictions for creativity.
In the second part, I give a more extensive overview of Eastern perspectives on education
and specifically Jin Lis work, Cultural Foundations of Learning. I introduce the role of
cultural relevance in research as advocated by socio-cultural theorists. In looking for answers for
my research questions, I argue that most Eastern critique of studies on education in general and
of studies on creativity in particular draw from a few limited Eastern countries, mainly China or
Japan, which are not necessarily representative of the East. I conclude that my study will make
best use of whats available in the literature but mostly rely on my own background and
understanding of Vietnamese education as a cultural filter for my analysis.
Creativity in Western scholarship
The Education Paradox
The education paradox is a Western discourse on education that questions the purpose of
education and the relationship between student and teacher. It dates back to the Classical era,
when Plato, believing that children would never learn unless they wanted to learn, wrote:
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
14/1579
Compulsory learning never sticks in the mind (Plato, The Republic, 7.536e). Various
contemporary thinkers, including Socratic-Kantian theorists like Leonard Nelson (1956)
cognitive scientists like Gilbert Ryle (1949), and social development scholars like David
Hawkins (2011), have also describe the paradox of education. Sizer & Sizer gave perhaps the
best statement of this paradox in the context of schooling:
Schools exist for children, but children are often seen as the schools clients, as its
powerless people. They are told that they are in school not because of what they know
but because of what they dont know. All over the world, powerless people lose the
instinct to help, because it is so often rebuffed in them (Sizer & Sizer, 1999).
Sizer and Sizer clearly highlight the ever-pressing nature of this paradox in the modern
days, ever since the introduction of mass schooling in the US. This central paradox of education
poses an existential crisis for pedagogy: although the teacher wants to help his or her students
learn, it is not until the student internalizes the knowledge and thus no longer needs the teacher
that the teacher fulfills this mission (Fisher, 1993). The ultimate goal of education, namely
students acquisition of knowledge, might conflict with the very means to get to that goal,
namely the transfer of knowledge from teacher to student. The question is then, how can this
education paradox be resolved, if it is resolvable in the first place?
One possible answer to this question comes from John Dewey, the mastermind behind
child-centered education and many other influential theories in education and social reform.
Considered the Father of Progressive Education in the United States, Dewey had in spired a
movement in the United States at the turn of the twentieth century that would make learning
meaningful and pleasurable by focusing on the needs and interests of children (Zilversmit, 1993,
p. 1). The publication of Deweys The School & Society in 1899 enunciated a comprehensive
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
15/15710
account of his educational philosophy, a child-centered education thatbegins with the interests
and capacities of the child, not with the formal curriculum (Zilversmit, 1993, p. 7). He believed
that each child should be regarded as a distinct individual who comes to school with a number of
important assets, such as an interest in communication, in finding out things, in making things,
which the teacher should make use of (Dewey J. , 1900). He also believed that a gradual interest
in the inquiry of abstract knowledge could come through time, paving way for an increasing
capacity to see long-term goals (Zilversmit, 1993, p. 7). From this perspective, the paradox is
addressed by a focus on the students: if the teacher starts from what the child is interested in and
can do, he will be able to facilitate the childs process of internalizing the knowledge.
Creativity as the solution for the education paradox
Advocates of child-centered education also propose that learning should be seen as a
process of problem-solving rather than just knowledge-acquiring (Dewey, 1900; Entwistle, 1970).
It is this particular characteristic of a child-centered education that leads to the argument for
focusing creativity, defined as the application of knowledge and skills in new ways to achieve
a valued goal (Seltzer & Bentley, 1999, p. 10). In fact, the first call for the teaching of creativity
in education originated in England in the 1960s, where discussion on child-centered education
loomed large (Craft, Jefferey, & Leibling 2001). The publication of the Plowden Report (1967)
by the British Central Advisory Council for Education recognized creativity as a desirable aim
for inclusion in the curriculum, particularly in primary education (Craft et al, 2001). The report,
known for its praising of child-centered approaches and stressing that at the heart of the
educational process lies the child, is the first official attempt to link creativity directly to a
child-centered education.
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
16/15711
However, the pedagogic approach advocated by the Plowden Report came under attack
by many critics who argued that children could not be expected to discover for themselves
without significant knowledge input (Cox & Dyson, 1971). Craft (2001) also pointed out that it
was this strong pushback on child-centered education that laid the way for the introduction of a
subject-content-based national curriculum in Britain at the end of the 1980s.
The renewed interest in creativity in education in Britain in the 1990s brought a new
dimension to the established link between creativity and a child-centered education: economic
imperative. Many scholars have argued that that the shift from a traditional economy
(manufacturing, industry-based) to the the weightless economy (e-commerce, service-based,)
required greater flexibility from the labor workforce (Seltzer & Bentley, 1999; Green & Little,
2007). Facing global competitiveness and pressure to lower wages, workers are encouraged to
acquire skills that could apply to portfolio careers or many different jobs. As Seltzer and
Bentley put it:
To thrive in our economy defined by the innovative application of knowledge, we must
be able to do more than absorb and feedback information. Learners and workers must
draw on their entire spectrum of learning experiences and apply what they have learned
in new and creative ways. A central challenge for the education system is therefore to
find ways of embedding learning in a range of meaning for contexts, where students can
use their knowledge and skills creatively to make an impact on the world around them.
(Seltzer & Bentley, 1999, pp. 9-10)
According to Seltzer and Bentley, a creative learner can also become a creative worker.
In this new age, students are also regarded as potential workers who have to prove themselves to
be globally competitive and flexible. This prioritization ofagency in the face of rapid changes
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
17/15712
in the economy aligns perfectly with the objectives of educational reformists in the 1920s.
Creativity once again regained attention from policy-makers and made its way to the reform
agenda of the 1990s, especially in the Western world (Craft, Jefferey, & Leibling, 2001).
It is important to note that this education-economics duo is still a highly contested idea
and clearly has achieved no global consensus. For example, Kratke (2010) criticized this
approach for its highly affirmative concept of education and the current mode of capitalism.
Clearly, there has been no unanimous acceptance of this default capitalist mode of production in
literature as well as in practice. But it is precisely this contested nature of the economics-
education duo that necessitates an examination on creativity: as this study attempts to demystify
what it means to be creative, it also serves to verify the notion whether creativity is just an
economic tool in this global era.
The above section has explained why a focus on creativity could be a solution to the
problem of ineffective education, as conceived by most scholars from the West. To cope with the
education paradox, focus on the child and his or her creativity seems to be a great pedagogical
goal. Furthermore, in a more globalized world, producing a more creative workforce promises a
great economic tool. The next question is: if creativity is so important, how to incorporate it in
education?
Creativity in Education
The attempts incorporate creativity in education have led to the biggest debate among
creativity scholars, namely proponents of high creativity versus poponents of little-c
creativity (Craft, Jefferey, & Leibling, 2001). While the former argue that creativity represents
exceptional human capacity (Ryhammar & Brolin, 1999, p. 261), the kinds of things that
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
18/15713
people do that change the world (Feldman et al, 1994) and that are accepted by experts as
being of scientific, aesthetic, social, or technological value (Vernon, 1989, p. 94; Gardner,
2011); the latter emphasize on the notion of an everyday, ordinary and democratic creativity
that all pupils can achieve (Craft, 2000). In his preface of the book Creativity in Education, Sir
Ken Robinson, chairman of the British National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural
Education, confirmed that creativity could and should be taught in school, precisely because it
is not confined to particular activities or people and flourishes under certain conditions
(Craft, Jefferey, & Leibling, 2001; Robinson, 2011). Indeed, a review of creativity literature
reveals that the shift from defining creativity as a trait of personality (nature) to imaginativecapacity or possibility thinking (nurture) has confirmed that creativity can be taught. The
current study, thus, will focus on little-c creativity, the concept of creativity as a potent force
that all can benefit from.
The discussion on creativity also brings the education paradox to the fore. That is, if
creativity is defined as a persons capacity to produce new or original ideas (Vernon, 1989),
the question remains whether this capacity could be taught and how it is taught most effectively.
This question gives rise to yet another classic debate in education between John Dewey, who
pioneered child-centered education and Lev Vygotsky, who pioneered the cultural-historical
focus in education. While sharing similar ideas with Dewey concerning the importance of
classroom activities that engage students, Vygotsky differs fundamentally from Dewey on why
these activities are important (Glassman, 2001). Whereas Dewey, the father behind child-center
education, sees the individual experience at the central of learning, Vygotsky believes that the
individual is immersed and inseparable from his or her own culture. His concept of Zone of
Proximal Development (ZPD) serves as part of his argument on the importance of the
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
19/15714
environment in general and of the teacher in particular. Zone of Proximal Development refers to
the range of tasks that a child can complete, with the upper limit being the level of potential skill
that the child is able to reach with the assistance of a more capable instructor (Kozulin, 1990).
That is, ZDP is a learning edge with a cultural set of norms.
Likewise, the Hungarian psychologist Csikszentmihalyi (1996), author of Flow and
theory on Creativity also emphasizes the importance of external factors when it comes to
evaluation of creativity. Taking off from Vygotskys conceptualization of socio -cultural
influences, Csikszentmihalyi argues that while creativity originates in the minds, actions and
interactions of individuals, it is fundamentally a socio-cultural concept. That is, a product must
be communicated to other people and at least tolerated by them (socio-cultural validation) in
order to be acclaimed as creative. Taking this view implies that my discussion and evaluation of
creativity should take into consideration the role of external environment. In the next section, I
will review several ways to assess creativity and the challenges regarding this practice, as most
commonly found in Western literature.
Assessing creativity: teachers role and students voice
Research on assessment of creativity has been underdeveloped at best, even within the
Western world. As one of the few scholars that theorize a systematic way to assess creativity,
Torrance (1965) describes four components by which individual creativity could be assessed: 1.
Fluencythe ability to produce a large number of ideas, 2.Flexibilitythe ability to produce a
large variety of ideas, 3. Elaborationthe ability to develop, embellish, or fill out an idea and 4.
Originality the ability to produce ideas that are unusual, statistically infrequent, not banal or
obvious. These components originated from Guildford (1967)s conceptualization of divergent
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
20/15715
thinking, defined as the ability to generate multiple solutions to a problem, as opposed to
convergent thinking, which is characterized by the orientation towards deriving the single best
answer/solution to a given question/problem (Cropley, 2001).
Torrances criteria are subject to many criticisms from scholars, due to the inherent
subjective nature of this process. Almost unanimously, theorists agree that teachers exude a bias
against creativity, most clearly through their evaluation of students performances (Fryer, 1996;
Torrance, 1965; Cropley, 2001; Craft, 2000). Many studies on teachers use of Torrrance tests
have shown that teachers prefer skills that are easier to measure (such as memorization and
accurate recall). They tend to struggle with evaluating skills such as critical thinking or
independent decision making. Indeed, Cropley (2001) s summary of empirical findings over the
last 30-40 years suggests different variations of the inverse relationship between creativity and
harmonious teacher-student relationship. That is, teachers tend to place a low value on creativity
traits as being useful in the school environment, and often find the most creative students most
disruptive and troublesome of all.
Additionally, Fryer (1996)s study of 1,000 American teachers found that many teachers
preferred judging students work against each individuals past performance. If this is the case, a
teachers assessment of students performance might not reflect their actual ability, but rather the
teachers preconceived notion of their ability. Whats more, Fryer also criticized Torrances
criteria to be too high in standards, potentially damaging students self-esteem. Thus, he
recommended, self-assessment should be encouraged to foster a stronger sense of agency among
students.
A number of research studies have supported Fryers emphasis on students perceptions.
These authors argue that as students approach to learning is a fucntion of their conceptions of
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
21/15716
learnings, the extent to which they perceive the environment as encouraging or inhibiting their
creativity could influence their creative learning behavior (Saljo, 1979; Prosser, Trigwell, &
Taylor, 1994; Ramsden, 2003). In the words of Reid and Petocz:
The most sophisticated conceptions of learning, and the best approaches to learning,
then, may enable students to demonstrate creativity through their learning outcomes. The
reverse could also be true: students with limiting conceptions and approaches may not be
able to be creative or demonstrate creativity within a specific learning domain. (Reid
& Petocz, 2004, p. 48)
Thus, both Torrances framework and critiques from his opponents are very important to my
research: while the former provides a benchmark to evaluate student creativity, the latter calls for
a more balanced reflection of student creativity. Therefore, my study should focus on students
perceptions of education as a proxy for creativity. In assessing creativity, I will add an extra
criteria besides fluency, originality, flexibility and elaboration, namely agency. As defined by
Fryer, agency represents students active involvement and engagement with their education.
Fostering creativity
Thus far, this literature review has alluded to the fact that the environment and the teacher
are very important determinants in student creativity. To understand this relationship even
further, I lookat the question in what way? That is, I will examine how exactly the teachers
and the environment influence student creativity.
With regards to the role of the teacher, researchers suggest that teachers can resolve their
bias against creativity by balancing between fostering creativity and maintaining other traditional
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
22/15717
virtues of learning such as good memory, obedience, accuracy, or discipline. Here are some of
the characteristics of a creativity-fostering teacher, as suggested by the literature:
Has a co-operative, socially integrative style of teaching;
Encourages students to learn independently;
Does not neglect mastery of factual knowledge;
Tolerates sensible or bold errors;
Promotes self-evaluation;
Takes questions seriously;
Offers opportunities to work with varied materials under different conditions;
Helps students learn to cope with frustration and failure;
Rewards courage as much as being right.
(Cropley, 2001, p. 138)
Besides the teacher, researchers also highlights the the role of learning environment in
fostering student creativity: many argue that a more open learning environment, particularly that
within the classroom itself, better fosters creativity among students. Urban (1991) defines this
environment as one that is tolerant towards differences and encourages idea-generation and risk-
taking. It is also one that shifts the focus away from the teacher, whose role should be more like
that of a facilitator than an instructor (Cropley, 2001). Many studies have associated this kind of
environment with a high level of creativity. For example, Goyals 1973 study on the varying
degrees of openness of school environments on students from two different middle-schools
indicated that the expression of creative potentialities is encouraged by a flexible and stimulating
school environment and discouraged by a rigid and traditional school environment.
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
23/15718
According to Urbans framework of analysis, characteristics of an open learning
environment can be categorized into six different components of creativity, all together forms a
Componential Model of Creativity.7
The Six components are:
1. Divergent thinking & doing;
2. General knowledge and thinking base;
3. Specific knowledge base and specific skills;
4. Focusing & task commitment;
5. Motives and Motivation; and
6. Openness and tolerance of ambiguity.
For each of these conditions, Urban offers many concrete and behaviors or patterns of behaviors
that are observable and/or identifiable in a class setting (See Appendix B.2 & B.3 for more
details)
In addition to Urbans framework, Croppley also suggests potential blocks to creativity
within a classroom setting. While most of these characteristics are encompassed in Urbans
framework, it is important to highlight some of the most important ones. Some features of an
anti-creativity learning environment are: emphasis on being right, external evaluation, teachers
impatience with time wasting, conformity pressures, and sharp distinction between work and
play. The emphasis on being right, for example, blocks creativity through the way it distorts
students motivation for learning (pleasing the teacher) and perception of purpose of education
(getting good grades). In a classroom where teacher focuses on getting the right answer,
questions are posed as a discovered problem rather than just a presented problem (Croppley,
1967, p.89).
7 See Appendix B.1,2 and 3 for a detailed description and graphic presentation of this model
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
24/15719
An important asterisk to add to this discussion on fostering creativity in education is the
implication of the space for creativity. Both Cropeley and Urban seem to point toward an open
learning environment that happens within a classroom setting and could be mediated by an open
teacher. This suggests one important spatial component of creativity: all these researchers
suggest that creativity could and should happen within a more open-learning environment.
Culturally relevant framework for creativity
Although the existing body of literature on creativity highlights many important themes
and debates on creativity in Western education, it does not give adequate attention to the role of
culture in shaping students' expression of creativity. In the next section, I present basic
arguments made by socio-cultural theorists for more culturally relevant theories and frameworks
in research, followed by Jin Li (2012)'s discussion on the fundamental differences between
Eastern and Western concepts, processes and outcomes of learning. Together, they serve as
critiques of existing literature on creativity, which has placed negligible weight at best on
culture.
At the crux of socio-cultural theory is the idea that learning, like any other human
processes, is constantly shaped by "system of powers" within a cultural context. In the words of
Cynthia Lewis and Elizabeth Moje:
"Learning is always situated in participation within discourse communities [that]
produce and struggle over cultural tools, resources, and identities. [It] follows that
learning is shaped by power relations, even-or especially-those relations that are not
obvious acts of power" (Lewis & Moje, 2003, p. 1992).
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
25/15720
In their research on Latino Youth in Detroit, Lewis and Moje argue that precisely because
this system of powers is oftentimes not "obvious", individuals are deeply entrenched in it while
also able to make use of different aspects of it in different spaces and times. Once an individual
perceive the cultural legitimacy in his or her act, what follows is a reinforcement of this system
and its legitimacy even further. The implicit yet powerful role of culture and system of powers at
large was strongly promoted by some of the most influential thinkers in the 20th
century,
including Foucault (1977), author of Discipline & Punish: the Birth of the Prison and Bordieu
(1984), author of Distinction: a Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Heavily influenced
by the work of these thinkers, Lewis and Moje argue that it is impossible to separate an
individual and his or her act from the discourse on identity, agency, power and of course, culture.
Yet, my review of creativity research reveals that this important characteristic of learning,
that is learning deeply situated in culture, is not given due respect by those that study creativity
in education. Despite acknowledging the role of socio-cultural factors in the evaluation of
creativity (see above section on Csizzentmihalyi), existing theories tend to overlook the role of
power, simplify cultural differences, and argue for a "universalization of creativity" (Kaufman &
Sternberg, 2006; Craft, Jefferey, & Leibling, 2001). In his final concluding chapter of the
International Handbook of Creativity, a collection of scholarly articles on creativity in a wide
variety of countries, Simonton (2006) argues that despite many cultural differences, research on
creativity across countries has converged in many fundamental ways and creativity is, after all,
a universal phenomenon (Simonton, 2006, p. 495). Particularly, he claims that most nations
research is heavily dependent on that of the US, the pioneer of this investigation on creativity.
Similarly, emerging Eastern studies on creativity also express a concern that there has been no
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
26/15721
major breakthrough in the non-Western world when it comes to creativity research, because this
area of research has been dependent on Western concept for a long time (Lau, Hui & Ng, 2004).
This lopsided dependency on Western research is problematic because, as advocates of
socio-cultural theorists might say, it suggests a kind of power relation at the macro level, namely
the superiority of Western over Eastern model, as well as a kind of power legitimated not by
individual actors but by the general discourse (Rogoff, 2003; Purcell-Gates, 2002; Spring, 2010).
My task in this study, thus, is to problematize this taken for granted discourse and to identify
actual cultural storylines that frame the expressions of creativity by individual actors, particular
Vietnamese students.
Along the same line, Jin Li (2012) and her work on the differences between Eastern and
Western concepts of learning complicate the universalization of creativity in existing research.
Her bookCultural Foundations of Learnings hightlights three fundamental contradictions
between Western learning and Chinese learning, which she argues can be extended to Eastern
learning as many Eastern countries share with China Confucian traditions.
First, the paradox of education, as captured in Platos quote compulsory learning never
sticks to the mind, does not seem to be a paradox within the Eastern tradition. In her book, Li
clearly explains this stark contrast by comparing Western learning tradition, as explained by
Plato and ancient Western philosophers, and Chinese learning tradition, as expressed in
Confuciuss thinking. Learning, according to Confucius, is a process of perfecting virtues and
enduring hardship rather than a process of mastering the universe and cultivating the mind (Li,
2012, p.37). He also thinks that learning is not a choice it is a gift. An ideal Chinese learner,
just like Confucius who had his heart and mind set upon learning from the age of 15, should
make a life-long commitment for learning and embrace learning no matter what. Thus, the idea
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
27/15722
of compulsory learning being a problem as posed by Western scholars does not resonate well
with Eastern tradition, or at least Chinese tradition.
Second, Deweys concept of a child-centered education seems to contradict another
fundamental value placed in the Chinese learning process: respect for teachers. In Lis words:
As a learner, particularly a beginner, one has much to learn. Respect for the teacher
makes the learner receptive to the teachers guidance. One needs to put ones ego aside in
order to make a sincere commitment to learning. The pupil is not an equal peer to the
teacher (Li, 2012, p.51)
Lis quote highlights letting go of ones ego and respecting the teacher, which seem to go
against the idea of a child-centered education: in the Confucian tradition, at the center of
education stands the teacher who is supposed to know better, not the child who is just a
beginner.Li argues that while a Western learner might view this as sign of obedience, docility,
or lack of critical thinking, a Chinese learner views it as a virtuous characteristic in line with his
or her morale (p.51).
And third, Lis book poses a very interesting phenomenon, which she calls the
paradoxical Chinese learner (Li, 2012, p.72). That is, despite many criticisms on the current
Chinese pedgagogy that is old-fashioned, teacher-centered, authoritarian, with a centralized
curriculum implying inflexibility and lack of attention to individual childrens learning needs,
Chinese learners and Asian learners, including Asian imigrants in developed countries, continue
to achieve well in comparision to their Western peers in the same countries! To Li, the Asian
achievement and performance have a lot to do with their learning beliefs under the influence of
the Confucian learning tradition (p.82).
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
28/15723
The compromise: toward a more culturally relevant framework within the Vietnamese context
While compelling, Lis critiques are inadequate in and of themselves: first, there seems to
be a heavy emphasis on Chinese tradition, as Confucius himself is after all a Chinese philosopher.
In the context of other Eastern countries, such as Vietnam, the extent to which Confucian
thinking makes an impact on students learning beliefs and learning process is less clear.
Similarly, many emerging research on creativity in Eastern countries, such as Lui, Hau and Ng
studies in 2004, are conducted in a few Chinese-speaking countries, such as China, Hong Kong
or Singapore, which cannot represent Eastern countries as a whole. Second, Lis arguments do
not seem to directly address the role of creativity within an Eastern context. As explained earlier,
the focus on creativity is justified on two grounds, namely pedagogical reason and economic
reason. Especially with regard to the argument that a creative workforce might be what a more
globalized world needs, there has to be more research that focuses on this aspect of creativity.
Presumably, the arguments about the universalization of creativity made by those aformentioned
researchers stems from many compelling convergence theories, such as Meyers (1979) concept
of the universalization of education. Meyer claims that there is a tendency for all national
educational systems in the world to converge toward a common structure and set of practice
(Ginsburg, 2012). Similarly, other authors mention how less developed industrialized nations
face greater global pressure toward convergence, which results in their borrowing of structures
and practices from the more developed nations (Inkeles and Sirowy, 1984).
Thus, this back and forth debate on universalization of creativity adds nuances to my
exploration of Vietnamese student creativity. The case of Vietnam will serve to confirm, negate
or at least complicate this generally accepted claim on the universalization of creativity by
looking specifically at whetherand how Vietnamese students express it. Additionally, my solid
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
29/15724
background on Vietnamese culture serves as a cultural filter for my assessment. That is, my
personal judgment of what creativity entails plays an important role in this evaluation.
Theoretical Propositions
In summary, the above literature review has situated my study within the existing
scholarship on creativity and education. From it, I was able to extrapolate predictions for my
three research questions: 1. Are Vietnamese students creative, and to what extent?; 2. What
explains the differences in student creativity? And 3. Under what conditions, or what kind of
learning environments, does student creativity flourish?
As derived from literature review, my three main theoretical propositions are: 1.
Vietnamese students are capable of being creative; 2. Learning environments, especially the role
of the teachers, explain the differences in student creativity and 3. Under a more open learning
environment , students tend to show more traits of creativity. As mentioned in the second part of
literature review, these are propositions drawn from Western tradition of research, thus I will
keep in mind any cultural nuances in my actual assessment of each construct.
To assess student creativity, I use a modified framework from Torrances four-
component criteria, with an added element of agency. Students perception is the ba sis of my
assessment, as literature has shown that the biggest flaw in research on assessing creativity to be
the lack of focus on students voice. My judgment of how open the learning utilizes Urbans
criteria with some modification and simplification.8
Particularly, I make an effort to adjust the
framework according to culturally appropriate norms and according to my interpretation of
students own perspectives.
8 For a more detailed description of the modified version of Urbans framework, see appendixE
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
30/15725
Limitations9
This thesis faces several limitations.
First, although the results of this study could be generalized to existing theories on
creativity in education, they cant be generalized to larger population. Due to the nature of a case
study, there might be a reason to suspect that our research selectively attracts a very particular
group of students. Similarly, the two schools that I chose to conduct research (see chapter 4) are
not necessarily representative of all schools in Vietnamese educational system. However, as
explained in my method chapter, I attempt to mitigate this limitation by adopting a wide variety
of methods (including interviews, surveys and classroom observations) and triangulation of data.
At best, the biggest contribution of my study lies in its questioning of current understanding on
creativity in education and how further study might want to proceed.
And second, as pointed out in the literature, assessing creativity is extremely challenging
and even when it is possible, it could not be standardized (Craft, Jefferey, & Leibling, 2001).
This happens because unlike intelligence, creativity could only be relatively measured through
subjective measures (as opposed to test scores). Furthermore, as explained in the section on
culture, creativity as a culturally sensitive topic necessitates a culturally appropriate assessment.
However, to date, most evaluations of creativity have heavily depended on that of the West, and
even the studies with an Eastern focus only make modifications and adjustments instead of
radically different measures. Although I attempt to vary these measures base on my personal
understanding of the Vietnamese culture as well as its educational system, the accuracy and
representativeness of my analysis depends heavily on my subjectivity. I explain in more
extensively length on the limitation of a researchers reflexivity in chapter 2.
9 See chapter 2 for more
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
31/15726
Thesis Structure
This first chapter, Introduction, poses the crux of this study: an investigation into the
problem of ineffective education and a look at creativity as the potential solution for this problem.
The literature review situates the study in existing research on creativity in education and
provides a general framework of analysis as used in previous studies. This chapter also provides
readers with the 3 main research questions together with the theoretical propositions for each
question based on literature review. Providing the readers with a brief overview of the
Vietnamese education system, this study fills in the gap of existing body of literature with
regards to its lack of focus on students' voice and inadequate attention to cultural variations.
The second chapter, a note on Method, justifies the use of different methods and clarifies
the procedures used to attain results in chapter 3 and 4. Using students' applications for the
Creative Kid Project as a starting point, this chapter delves into the systematic procedure used to
study middle-school students from two of CKP's partner schools in Vietnam and the resulting
comparative case study of these two schools. One important part of this section is the piece on
reflexivity, with reference to my own educational background and the potential effects that might
have on my motivation for this study and my interpretation of the results.
The third chapter presents the Creative Kid Project as a case study for an education
initiative with exclusive focus on creativity. I used students' applications (in the form of survey
responses) to analyze their creativity and answer the first research question: Are Vietnamese
students capable of being creative? I used students' articulation of ideas as a proxy for their
creativity, as the Torrance's framework for assessing creativity has a lot to do with idea creation.
To refine my analysis, I divided students based on ages and school types (explained more in the
chapter). The results show differences in student creativity, particularly between students of two
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
32/15727
specific schools with very different educational models and between students of different age
(particularly younger middle-schoolers and older middle schoolers). Contrary to my theoretical
propositions (described in chapter 1) students from a perceived open learning environment seem
to show fewer trait of creativity.
The fourth chapter serves as my main analytical chapter where the crux of my argument
lies: This chapter seeks to answer 2 research questions, namely, "what explains the differences in
student creativity?" and "under what conditions/ kinds of learning environment does student
creativity flourish?" in the second stage of the research. As the results from chapter 3 show
differences in creativity traits from students of two distinct middle-schools, this part of the
research takes a closer look at these two schools to explore a potential relationship between
students' learning environment and their expression of creativity. Results from this chapter
challenge the link between open learning environment and high creativity, as described in the
second proposition. Similar to results shown in Chapter 3, students from the experimental model,
or the school that has a more open learning environment according to Urban's framework, tend to
show fewer traits of creativity, paradoxically. One important piece of this chapter is the section I
call "Facets of Creativity". In this section, some of the most interesting tales of creativity emerge,
in rather different and unanticipated forms. I call this form of creativity informal creativity,
which will be discussed further in chapter 5.
The fifth, and last, chapter summarizes the results from both stages of my research and
confirms a paradox: in contrary to the theoretical propositions derived from literature review, a
more open learning environment does not seem to lead to more creativity, as expressed among
middle school students in Vietnam. In this chapter, I bring back the importance of cultural
relevance in analysis as discussed in Chapter 1. Both socio-cultural theorists and Jin Lis
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
33/15728
arguments make a necessary contribution to my argument: although creativity still finds ways to
express itself, the space, venue and channel through which Vietnamese students express it are
different from what literature suggests, presumably because of a cultural impediment. This
chapter concludes the thesis with suggestions for further study and a reflection on the
development of the Creative Kid Project
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
34/15729
CHAPTER TWO: Methodological Considerations
I stopped the recording. Thinh quickly glanced at my recorder, pretending that he didn't
just notice that. For the past twenty minutes, he had been rather nervous about the recorder,
frequently glancing at it every two or three minutes.
But the past twenty minutes had been rather disappointing. Thinh didn't say anything
much, and when he did, I could clearly sense how cautious he was in choosing words. He also
seemed agreeable on most of the things I said. "What do you think about the teacher just now?"
"I really liked her!" "Is there anything you want to change about the lesson?" "No?" "Is there
any teacher that you don't like too much?" "Not really
He was clearly uncomfortable. Was that the recorder? Was I intimidating to him? He had
been informed that I was just researcher wanting to learn more about his experience in school.
Would he be more open to me if I had not told him that? Or was he just generally shy to people?
Did it have anything to do with the fact that he studied in a non-specialized classroom?
I kept listening to his sporadic responses. But in my mind, those questions kept bothering
me. Finally, I stopped the recorder, making it as clear as possible to him that what he said might
no longer be used.
And to my utter surprise, our real conversation started then. I just wish I had the recording of it.
This chapter gives readers an extensive overview of the procedure I used to carry out this
research, including two stages: the immersion/exploratory stage and the investigation/fieldwork
stage. This chapter also describes the intricacies and difficulties of carrying out research, with
regard to my own background and identity as a Vietnamese student and a researcher.
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
35/15730
My study includes two stages: the first one is the immersion stage, in which I explored
different topics in creativity and education by studying the perspectives of participants in the
Creative Kid Project, CKP (see more detail below). This first stage answers my first research
question: Are Vietnamese students creative? It also suggests a possible answer to the second
research question "what explains student creativity" to be "school learning environments". The
second stage further examines the role of school learning environments on student creativity, by
comparing students from two middle schools in Vietnam. I chose these two schools because of
the different levels of creativity expressed by their students. This stage directly addresses the
question "What explains student creativity" and "under what conditions does student creativity
flourish?"
Stage 1 - The Immersion: Are Vietnamese students creative?
Throughout the preparation and organization of CKP in summer 2012, not only did I
have the chance to engage in direct interaction with the participants of my research but also to
take a first look at the general problems as well as opportunities facing Vietnamese education, as
demonstrated or implied by these students. The middle school students who participated in the
six-day long program went through an online application process and two interviews: the 28
finalists were chosen from a total of seventy-six candidates from 10 different schools. The
readily available data I have are from the detailed applications (in survey form) of a total of 76
participants from the first-round application (See Appendix C for application questions).
In this exploratory stage, I analyzed application responses from middle-school candidates
to test the first theoretical proposition, namely Vietnamese students are capable of being
creative. Although I did not collect their responses scientifically (rather, the responses were
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
36/15731
used to select participants for CKP program), the richness of their responses allowed me to
explore their creativity through the way they express their ideas as well as the relationship, if any,
between the type of school they go to and their expression of creativity. I analyzed their
perceptions of schooling as well as assessed their creativity as shown in the questions that asked
them to come up with ideas, based my modification of Torrances (1976) framework (see
Chapter 1). The format for these applications is in Appendix C.
From the findings of these initial analyses, I then distinguished two schools where
students exude the greatest differences in their expression of creativity. This led me to explore
the second proposition that differences in creativity could be explained by differences in learning
environment, particular the type of schools that students go to. The natural next step was to study
the two schools and understand the learning environment in these two schools.
Stage 2 - The Investigation: how does learning environment influence student creativity?
The role of Case study
In this stage, I conducted a comparative case study of two middle schools (explained
later) to examine my second and third theoretical propositions, namely: 1. Learning environment
correlates with student creativity and 2. More open learning environment and/or more open
teachers correlate to greater creativity.
I chose to conduct two parallel case studies because of the nature of my research
questions as well as the unique position of my study within existing scholarship on creativity in
education. First, in analyzing learning environment as one possible construct of my analysis on
creativity, I need an analytical tool to cover contextual conditions (the learning context) as well
as the phenomenon itself (the learning process). As such, case study serves as the best strategy
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
37/15732
for me to investigate a contemporary phenomenon within its real-life context, especially when
the boundaries between phenomenon and context are not clearly evident (Yin, 1994). Second,
this method helps me mitigate the weaknesses of the frameworks drawn from literature. As
described in chapter 1, most of the research on creativity has utilized Western frameworks that
are more appropriate in Western context. Thus, the use of case study is even more pivotal in my
own study of Vietnamese students: as I choose student creativity and learning environment as the
two main constructs of my study, this method allows me to take into account many of the social,
historical and cultural boundaries that make up the context of these two constructs.
Experimental School and Traditional School
The two schools that I choose to study and discuss in chapter 4 are the focal point of my
study. I choose these two schools for a variety of reasons, which I will discuss in great length in
Chapter 4 under the History and Culture Section.
First, these are the two schools with the largest number of applications for the Creative
Kid Project (see chapter 3). Thuc Nghiem Middle School (Experimental School from this point)
is in fact the host school that provided venue and facility for our 6-day long program. My
familiarity with the school granted me easy access to the school administrators and teachers as
well as an initial understanding of the general culture and environment of the school. Likewise,
Trung Vuong Middle School (Traditional School from this point) is the school with the second
largest number of participants. Many of Traditional Schools teachers and students have helped
me in the process of organizing CKP as well as sustaining students projects after the program
was over.
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
38/15733
Second, both Experimental and Traditional School are prestigious middle schools in
Vietnam that are perfect for my quest to find a solution for ineffective education in Vietnam.
Located within 15 minutes from each other in the central of Hanoi, both schools are very well
known among Vietnamese parents and their models are constantly compared against each other
in newspaper and popular discourse. While these two schools will not tell me stories of
Vietnamese education as a whole, they serve as some of the best cases to study in the context of
a reforming educational landscape in the country. That is, these will be the schools with the most
favorable conditions to adopt new educational strategies and initiatives. In the case of
Experimental School, this is the one school with a distinct model from the rest of the public
school system in Vietnam. In the case of Traditional School, it has always been the first school to
adopt any new policy from the Ministry of Education and Training (see chapter 4).
While sharing many comparable features, these schools possess strikingly different
characteristics with regard to philosophy of education, pedagogical focus and student body. As I
will explain in the discussion on school history, culture and overall environment, Traditional and
Experimental School offer me with ample opportunity to present a detailed analysis on the
effectiveness of each model on students and student creativity, if any.
Triangulation of method
To reach a comprehensive understanding of the "learning environment" in the two
schools, I relied on three methods, namely classroom observation, interviews and surveys
(method triangulation) and three kinds of study subjects, specifically administrators, students and
teachers (subject triangulation) as part of my comparative case study (See table 2.1). While each
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
39/15734
method has its own strengths and limitations, they supplement each other and together help me
gain a more holistic understanding of each school's learning environment.
Table 2.1: Overall of Methods used
ClassroomObservations
StudentSurveys
StudentsInterviews(groups/
individuals)
TeachersInterviews
AdministratorInterviews
Traditional
School
Nine 50-
minute classes
63 32 (248) 5 1
Experimental
School
Eight 45-
minute classes
50 24(1113) 5 1
Administrator Interviews10
Administrator interviews are extremely helpful in providing me with the historical
background and general features that make up their unique school culture. In my one-hour-long
interview with the vice headmaster in each school, I asked them to explain their philosophy of
education, the uniqueness of their schools, their perceptions and evaluations of the teachers and
students, their aspirations for the development of the schools, and their personal story as the
administrator of each school. My questions in effect asked them to give a "SWOT" analysis of
their schools, including Strength, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats.11
In both cases, their
responses were rich and nuanced because they had been teachers before becoming administrators.
One limitation is that these administrators speak on behalf of their own schools and generally
have an incentive to provide me with details in favor of their own organizations. Thus, I also
verified their words by asking students and teacher for their opinions on some of the general
remarks and comments made by these administrators.
10 See Appendix D1 & D211 SWOT analysis is used frequently in organizational studies to evaluate an organization/institution effectively.
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
40/15735
Classroom Observations & Students' surveys12
Classroom observations and students' surveys present me with classroom activities,
teaching and learning styles, and students' perceptions their classrooms learning environment.
As "learning environment" is a complex and multifaceted construct, I adhered as closely as
possible to Urban's framework of open learning environment in constructing the observation log
and survey questionnaires (see Appendix E&F). This framework defines an "open learning
environment" as one that promotes six different areas (divergent thinking, general knowledge,
specific knowledge, focus and commitment, sense of goal and direction, and fun and tolerant
environment) and provides me with concrete, observable classroom behaviors to demonstrate
these characteristics. For a full description of these observable criteria, see Appendix C.
In each school, I conducted 8-9 different classroom observations that varied in subjects
taught, teachers, grade levels and classroom type (see table 2.2). My key contact in each school
provided me with a weekly schedule of every class in the schools, allowing me to strategically
vary my observation subjects.
Table 2.2: Breakdown of classroom observations (based on class type, grades and subjects)
Specialized Non-
Specialized
6t
& 7t
grade
8t
& 9t
grade
Subjects taught
Traditional
School(9
observations
in total)
8 1 4 5 Music, Agricultural
Technology, Physics, CivicEducation, English,
Vietnamese, Math, and
History
(8 in total)
ExperimentalSchool
(8
observations
in total)
N/A N/A 4 4 Music, Geography, Art,Civic Education,
Chemistry, Vietnamese,
Math, and Biology
(8 in total)
12 See Appendix F1& 2
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
41/15736
In each classroom observation, I used the Urban-criteria for an "open learning
environment" (see appendix for observation log) as a common measure. I paid close attention to
student-teacher interaction, the extent of student's participation, teaching style, classroom
dynamic, and key activities. Thanks to the intensive and interactive nature of the 45-50 minute
lectures, I was able to take notes of events that happened in real time and contextualize what
students, teachers and administrators talked about during their interviews. At the same time, this
method is also limited in several ways: I was unable interpret every detail in a single classroom
observation. Classroom interactions, as it turns out, often center around the teacher, thus
potentially preventing me from understanding what students think, feel and actually do. For
some classes, the teachers and students were actually notified beforehand of my observation, and,
as a result, might have changed their behaviors accordingly. I mitigated these problems by being
as unobtrusive as possible in the classroom. Typically, I would sit at the back and only
introduced myself if notified by the teachers.
After each observation, I distributed about 5-10 surveys to random students or in some
cases, their teachers. I explained the purpose of the surveys and asked them to return the surveys
to me, my contact or their teachers when they finished. I also distributed these surveys even in
classes I did not observe. To further increase the number of responses, I also posted the link
online for students who wished to fill in the online form (See Appendix F1&F2 for Survey
Questions). At the end, I obtained 63 and 50 surveys respectively from Traditional and
Experimental School. Thanks to my strategic outreach method, these surveys varied by CKP
status (whether or not they participated in CKP), grade levels, and type of class, as demonstrated
in the following table.
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
42/15737
Table 2.3: Breakdown of students surveys (based on class type, age and CKP status)
Specialized Non-Specialized
Younger(6&7
grades)
Older(8&9
grades)
Non-CKP
CKP Total
Traditional
School
43 20 31 32 53 10 63
Experimental
School
N/A N/A 27 23 44 6 50
The survey asked students to answer the questions I used in my classroom observation
(see Appendix E) to describe and evaluate classroom experience and teachers. I then
supplemented these survey answers with my observation records to compare and synthesize my
interpretation of classroom environment and students perceptions of it. As these surveys are
very short and anonymous, they provide me with quantifiable and comparable trends and
patterns between these two schools. Of course, surveys cannot provide me with in-depth answers
or stories, I then turn into my next method, interviews, to complete what surveys cannot do.
Student Interviews
I obtained these interviews through various methods. First, in my visits to each classroom
to distribute surveys, I asked students who were interested to sign up for follow-up interviews
and obtained most interview subjects this way. Second, through snowballing method, I asked
these interview subjects and CKP students to refer me their friends. And lastly, a number of
students also signed up for interviews online, after having filled in the online surveys. At the end,
I conducted 32 and 24 interviews respectively in Traditional and Experimental School. I again
tried to strategically interview students from different classes, grade levels and class type (see
table 2.4)
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
43/15738
Table 2.4: Breakdown of students interviews (based on class type, age and CKP status)
Specialized Non-Specialized
Younger(6&7
th
graders)
Older(8&9
th
graders)
Non-CKP
CKP Total
TraditionalSchool
23 9 14 18 22 10 32
Experimental
School
N/A N/A 12 12 21 3 24
In these interviews, I asked students to elaborate on their survey responses and tell me
about their experience in schools. As these interviews were meant to capture students'
perceptions of their learning environment as well as to later serve as a measure for their
creativity, I asked them many questions outside of the Interview Question Plan (See Appendix F),
depending on the circumstances. In fact, even the Interview Question plan itself went through
two or three iterations. This iterative process allowed me to gain a deeper understanding of
students' experience. For example, if I saw that one detail kept coming up time and again in
different interviews, I would include that into the next interview.
Depending on time constraints and students' availability, I conducted group interviews in
some cases and individual interviews in others. Interestingly, students seemed more comfortable
talking in groups rather than privately to me. Thus, whenever possible, I encouraged groups of
students to interview rather than asking individual participant who might be intimidated by my
presence.
-
7/28/2019 Linh Dao - Thesis on Vietnamese Education
44/15739
Teachers' interviews13
I interviewed five teachers from each school, four of whom were those whose classes I
observed. I selectively asked a few teachers (with various teaching styles) to interview with me
so that I could gain a better understanding of various teachers' perceptions. As for the fifth
teacher, I asked for recommendation from these teachers or sought a random one on my own.
Table 2.5: Breakdown of teachers interviews based on teaching styles and subjects taught
Style 1:
Interactive
Style 2: neither Style 3: Non-
interactive
Classroom not
observed
Traditional
School
2 1 1 1
Experimental
School
3 0 1 1
In these interviews, I asked teachers to explain and elaborate on what they did in the
classroom, their general teaching style, their perceptions of the school and their own students, as
well as their aspirations and concerns about teaching. Similar with the student interviews, I also
varied interview questions depending on the teachers. Many of the conversations with the
teachers offered me great insight not only into the internal working of the schools but also the
general problems facing Vietnamese education. However, one limitation of these teachers'
interviews is that these teachers are by nature self-selected. Being as busy as they are, those who
agreed to interview with me clearly demonstrated openness and willingness to talk. In fact, in the
case of one of the two schools, I was not welcomed by all teachers and some even deliberately
refused to let me observe their class in the first place. I compensated for this by approaching
students whose teachers I did not interview or whose class I did not observ