![Page 1: LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56649f0e5503460f94c232bc/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY
PARENT PRESENTATIONSeptember 24, 2015
![Page 2: LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56649f0e5503460f94c232bc/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
INDEX ONE
![Page 3: LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56649f0e5503460f94c232bc/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Index 1: Student Achievement
◦ All Students Only
◦ Combined over All Subject Areas
◦ Credit given for meeting phase-in Level II performance standard on: ◦ STAAR Grades 3-8 English and Spanish for assessments administered in the spring; ◦ STAAR Grades 3-8 Alternate;
![Page 4: LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56649f0e5503460f94c232bc/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Index 1 Index 2 Index 3 Index 4
Loma 201573 44 41 24
Loma 2014 68 49 39 20
Loma 2013 64 42 62 n/a
![Page 5: LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56649f0e5503460f94c232bc/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
INDEX TWO
![Page 6: LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56649f0e5503460f94c232bc/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Index 2: Student Progress
Index 2 measures :
◦Student progress by subject and by student demographics: race/ethnicity, special education, and ELLs.
◦The ELL progress measure is also used in Index 2 calculations
![Page 7: LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56649f0e5503460f94c232bc/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Index 1 Index 2 Index 3 Index 4
Loma 201573 44 41 24
Loma 2014 68 49 39 20
Loma 2013 64 42 62 n/a
![Page 8: LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56649f0e5503460f94c232bc/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
INDEX THREE
![Page 9: LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56649f0e5503460f94c232bc/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps Index 3 emphasizes :◦The academic achievement of economically disadvantaged students and the two lowest performing racial/ethnic student groups. ◦Groups are identified by campus or district and are based on prior year (2013) assessment results.
![Page 10: LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56649f0e5503460f94c232bc/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Index 1 Index 2 Index 3 Index 4
Loma 201573 44 41 24
Loma 2014 68 49 39 20
Loma 2013 64 42 62 n/a
![Page 11: LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56649f0e5503460f94c232bc/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
INDEX FOUR
![Page 12: LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56649f0e5503460f94c232bc/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness
◦Every subgroup contributes to ALL – regardless of size
◦Every campus contributes to the high school indicators
![Page 13: LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56649f0e5503460f94c232bc/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Index 1 Index 2 Index 3 Index 4
Loma 2015 73 44 41 24
Loma 2014 68 49 39 20
Loma 2013 64 42 62 n/a
![Page 14: LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56649f0e5503460f94c232bc/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
PRELIMINARY CAMPUS RESULTS
Ratings have not been released
![Page 15: LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56649f0e5503460f94c232bc/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Elementary School ResultsIndex 1
Target 60 Index 2
Target 30 Index 3
Target 28 Index 4
Target 12
Cisneros 73 39 41 22
Gardendale 59 32 28 13
HBG 56 44 30 11
Las Palmas 61 30 31 13
LBJ 78 38 43 30
Loma Park 73 44 41 24
Perales 75 48 40 19
Roosevelt 62 30 30 12
Stafford 69 40 36 19
Winston 60 40 29 14
Edgewood 62 +11 30 +14 33 +8 67/57 Target
![Page 16: LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56649f0e5503460f94c232bc/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
LOMA PARK CAMPUS DATA SPRING 2015
![Page 17: LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56649f0e5503460f94c232bc/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
3rd Grade Reading/Math# of Students in Class
Reading Met Standard
Reading Met Standard %
Reading Percent at Final Level 2
Math Met Standard
Math Met Standard %
Overall 109 83 76% 27% 53/107 49%
![Page 18: LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56649f0e5503460f94c232bc/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
4th Grade Reading/Math# of Students in Class
Reading Met Standard
Reading Met StandardPercent
Reading Percent at Final Level 2
Math Met Standard
Math Met StandardBenchmarkPercent
Overall 99 68 68% 50% 59/97 60%
![Page 19: LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56649f0e5503460f94c232bc/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
4th Grade Writing# of Students in Class
Writing Met Standard
Writing Met StandardPercent
Writing Percent at Final Level 2
Overall 103 70 67% 23%
![Page 20: LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56649f0e5503460f94c232bc/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
5th Grade Reading/Math # of
Students in Class
Reading Met Standard
Reading Met StandardPercent
Reading Percent at Final Level 2
Math Met Standard
Math Met StandardBenchmarkPercent
Overall 98 74 75 % 30% 47/92 51%
![Page 21: LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56649f0e5503460f94c232bc/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
DISTINCTIONS
![Page 22: LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56649f0e5503460f94c232bc/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Reading/Language ArtsMust meet 4/6 indicators for 67%
2015 Distinction Designations
Reading/Language ArtsMust meet 4/6 indicators for 67%
ScienceMust meet 1/2 indicators for 50%
Top 25% in Student ProgressSchools like us: one of top 10
Top 25% Closing Performance GapsSchools like us: one of top 13
Post Secondary Readiness 1/1 for 100%