1 Footer Style Project/Document Title Goes Here in Bold
Any reference details and dates etc go here in this style / ©THG 2008
Space for client
logo.
Delete if not
required.
Height - 19.25
Planning Assessment Report (Code)
Reconfiguring a lot - two (2) lots into two (2) lots
Mackay Christian CollegeMackay Christian CollegeMackay Christian CollegeMackay Christian College LtdLtdLtdLtd
12 Short Street and 9 Quarry Street, North Mackay
Lot 2 SP717286 and Lot 21 SP230942
2 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
Document ManagementDocument ManagementDocument ManagementDocument Management
Document InformationDocument InformationDocument InformationDocument Information
Job Number (if appropriate): 30076
Document Title: Planning Report
Document Reference (if appropriate): R – P - 01
AuthorsAuthorsAuthorsAuthors
Name (Initial) Title Date
Prepared: DHF Senior Town Planner 23 August 2012
Reviewed:
Reviewed:
Reviewed:
Release InformationRelease InformationRelease InformationRelease Information
Version Date Released Pages Affected Remarks
V1.0
Contact DetailsContact DetailsContact DetailsContact Details
All queries regarding this document should be directed to the undersigned in the first instance.
Director Project Manager
Shane Murphy Damien Frey
Telephone: 07 4951 2911 Telephone: 07 4951 2911
Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected]
3 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
Fax: 07 4953 1319 Fax: 07 4953 1319
Mobile: Mobile:
4 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
1.0 Table of Contents
1.0 Table of Contents ________________________________________________________________________ 4
2.0 Details of Application _____________________________________________________________________ 6
2.1 Site Details________________________________________________________________________ 6
2.2 Application Details ________________________________________________________________ 6
3.0 Introduction _____________________________________________________________________________ 8
3.1 Overview__________________________________________________________________________ 8
3.2 Pre-lodgement Meetings __________________________________________________________ 8
4.0 Background ______________________________________________________________________________ 9
4.1 Previous Approvals _____________________________________ Error! Bookmark not defined.Error! Bookmark not defined.Error! Bookmark not defined.Error! Bookmark not defined.
5.0 Context Analysis ________________________________________________________________________ 10
5.1 Regional Context Analysis ________________________________________________________ 10
5.2 Subject Site Analysis and Referral Triggers _________________________________________ 10
5.3 Referral Summary ________________________________________________________________ 10
6.0 Proposal ________________________________________________________________________________ 12
6.1 Adopted Infrastructure Charges ___________________________________________________ 12
7.0 Technical Assessment ___________________________________________________________________ 13
7.1 Infrastructure Assessment ______________________________ Error! Bookmark not defined.Error! Bookmark not defined.Error! Bookmark not defined.Error! Bookmark not defined.
8.0 Planning Framework & Assessment _______________________________________________________ 14
8.1 Assessment Framework __________________________________________________________ 14
8.2 Mackay, Isaac and Whitsunday Regional Plan _______________________________________ 14
8.3 Mackay City Planning Scheme _____________________________________________________ 14
8.4 Planning Scheme Assessment _____________________________________________________ 15
8.5 Relevant State Planning Policies ___________________________________________________ 28
8.6 Relevant Planning Scheme Policies ________________________________________________ 28
9.0 Conclusion of Assessment _______________________________________________________________ 29
9.1 Summary ________________________________________________________________________ 29
10.0 Appendices _____________________________________________________________________________ 30
5 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
10.1 IDAS Application Forms _____________________________________________________________ 30
10.2 Locality Plan _______________________________________________________________________ 31
10.3 Registered Plan ____________________________________________________________________ 32
10.4 Certificate of Title __________________________________________________________________ 33
10.5 Proposal Plan ______________________________________________________________________ 34
6 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
2.0 Details of Application
2.1 Site Details
Real Property Description Lot 2 on RP717286 and Lot 21 on SP230942
Address 12 Short Street and 9 Quarry Street, North Mackay
Area Lot 2
Lot 21
Owner(s) Mackay Christian Colleges Ltd
Easement(s) Lot 21 – EMT A on RP852588, EMT D on SP230942
Existing Uses Lot 2 - Dwelling House
Lot 21 - Educational Establishment
Local Government Authority Mackay Regional Council
Mackay, Isaac and Whitsunday Regional
Planning Designation
Urban Footprint
Planning Scheme Zone Lot 2 - Urban Residential
Lot 21 – Public Purposes
Locality and Precinct Frame Locality
Goosepond Creek
Previous Council Approvals DA-2006-197 and OW-2009-56 (Boundary
realignment of adjoining residential lots)
Water Infrastructure Located in Short Street
Sewer Infrastructure Existing sewer connection in Lot 2 and 21
Telecommunications and Power Existing connections
Topography Sloping from south to north
Access and Road Hierarchy
Classification
Via existing access arrangements
2.2 Application Details
Development Type Development Permit –Reconfiguring two (2) lots
into two (2) lots
IDAS Process Development Permit
Level of Assessment Assessable Development (Code Assessment)
Proposal Summary The proposal seeks to realign the existing property
boundaries to excise the rear of Lot 2 to be
amalgamated into Lot 21 to result in a rear
7 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
boundary line, consistent with the adjoining
property, 10 Short Street.
Referral Agencies Department of Environment and Heritage
Protection – Coastal Management and Land in a
wetland
Applicant Mackay Christian Colleges Ltd
Applicant's Representative Damien Frey
Whitsunday Surveys
PO Box 158
MACKAY QLD 4740
Relevant Plan(s) ‘Proposal Plan’, drawing no 30076PO1, Rev A,
8 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
3.0 Introduction
3.1 Overview
Whitsunday Surveys makes this development application on behalf of Mack Christian Colleges Ltd, for
a Development Permit for Reconfiguring two (2) lots into two (2) lots over Lot 2 on RP717286 and Lot
21 on SP230942, 12 Short Street and 9 Quarry Street, North Mackay.
The proposal seeks to realign the existing property boundaries to excise the rear potion of Lot 2 and
amalgamate this with Lot 21.
The new lots will be serviced by their existing infrastructure connections. It is proposed to extend the
inter allotment stormwater drainage to connect to the inter allotment drainage to the east.
3.2 Pre-lodgement Meetings
No pre-lodgement meeting was undertaken.
9 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
4.0 Background
4.1 Previous approvals
A previous development was undertaken over 4-10 Short Street to excise the rear of these lots and
amalgamate with this area of land with the Mackay Christian College Site, which was approved under
approvals DA-2006-197 and OW-2009-56.
10 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
5.0 Context Analysis
5.1 Regional Context Analysis
The proposal is for the reconfiguration of urban zoned land within the Urban Footprint and therefore
is generally consistent with the Mackay, Issac and Whitsunday Regional Plan.
5.2 Subject Site Analysis
Lot 2
Lot 2 is a regular shaped, 1,012m², Urban Residential zoned lot. There is an existing house
approximately 5m and a shed 29m from the road boundary of the site. The site has a gradual slope of
5%, sloping from south to north.
Lot 21 is an irregular shaped, 3.18ha, Public Purposes zone lot. There are numerous buildings on-site
which form the Mackay Christian College. The site has a gradual slope of 3.5%, sloping from south to
north.
Figure 1. Site Location Plan
5.3 Referral Summary
In accordance with Schedule 7 of the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009 (SPR), the following
referral agencies have been identified.
11 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
Concurrence Agency Interest
Department of Environment and Heritage
Protection
Coastal Management
Advice Agency Interest
Department of Environment and Heritage
Protection
Development within a wetland
12 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
6.0 Proposal
6.4 Adopted Infrastructure Charges
The proposal does not create any additional lots (demand) and therefore no infrastructure charges are
applicable to the development.
13 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
7.0 Technical Assessment
7.1 Engineering Assessment
No engineering assessment has been undertaken as it is assumed that only minor works
would be required to complete the development. It has however been identified that proposed
Lot 22 will need to have a lawful point of stomwater discharge. This is proposed by extending
the inter allotment drainage to the east of proposed Lot 22.
14 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
8.0 Planning Framework & Assessment
8.1 Assessment Framework
In accordance with Section 313 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 in determining this Code
Assessable planning application, the Assessment Manager (i.e. Mackay Regional Council) must have
regard to:
• the common material;
• any development approval for, and any lawful use of, premises the subject of the application
or adjacent premises;
• any referral agency’s response for the application; and
• the purposes of any instrument containing an applicable Code.
• if the Assessment Manager is not a Local Government – the laws that are administered by, and
the policies that are reasonably identifiable as policies applied by, the Assessment Manager
and that are relevant to the application are to be taken to be applicable codes.
On this basis, the planning framework and associated provisions that are applicable in this
assessment include:
• Mackay, Isaac and Whitsunday (MIW) Regional Plan; and
• Mackay City Planning Scheme 2006.
8.2 Mackay, Isaac and Whitsunday Regional Plan
Designation: Urban Footprint
The proposal is seeking to realign the existing property boundaries of Urban Residential and Public
Purposes Zoned land such that the proposal is considered to be generally consistent with the intent of
the Mackay, Isaac Whitsunday Regional Plan.
8.3 Mackay City Planning Scheme
The Planning Scheme for the City of Mackay is the current, applicable document for planning
assessment for applications. The proposal will be assessed against the following codes in accordance
with the Planning Scheme:
• Mackay Frame Locality Code;
15 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
• Reconfiguration of a Lot Code;
• Environment and Infrastructure Code;
• Public Purposes Zone Code;
• Urban Residential Zone Code;
• Coastal Management and Biodiversity Overlay Code;
• Landscape Character Overlay Code;
• Development in the Vicinity of the Mackay Airport Overlay Code; and
• Flood and Inundation Overlay Code.
8.4 Planning Scheme Assessment
The following sections assess the proposal against the abovementioned use codes and overlay codes
of the Planning Scheme.
8.4.1 Mackay Frame Locality Code
The following provides an assessment against the Mackay Frame Locality Code.
Division 7 Specific Outcomes and Probable and Acceptable Solutions for the Mackay Frame Locality
Specific Outcomes Probable/Acceptable
Solutions Outcomes Achieved
Assessable Development
P9 New development is serviced
by the full range of urban
infrastructure in an orderly,
efficient and equitable manner
as established in the priority
infrastructure plan.7
S9 No solution specified. Complies
The proposed lots can be efficiently
serviced from the existing
infrastructure.
7 A Priority Infrastructure Plan identifies where growth is expected to occur, the nature and scale of that
growth, and the plans and service standards for the trunk infrastructure necessary to service the growth.
Note: provisions not applicable to the development have not been addressed.
The proposal therefore complies with the Mackay Frame Locality Code.
8.4.2 Reconfiguration of a Lot Code
The following provides an assessment against the Reconfiguration of a Lot Code.
Table 9-18 Specific Outcomes and Acceptable and Probable Solutions for the Reconfiguration of a Lot Code
Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable
Solutions Outcomes Achieved
16 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
Assessable Development
Overall Design
P1 The proposed lot layout facilitates the desired future use of land in accordance with the relevant Locality Code by:
(i) establishing an orderly and acceptable land use pattern;
(ii) providing a road network consistent with the road hierarchy identified on the Key Infrastructure Maps (A and B);
(iii) providing a network, incorporating linkages, of public open space meeting community needs and protecting valuable features; and
(iv) providing an integrated drainage system based on natural drainage patterns and ecological processes.
S1 No solution specified.
Complies
The proposal achieves the performance outcome by:
• improving the configuration of the existing lots with regard to the usability of Lot 21; and
• the provision of an integrated drainage system.
Lot Areas and Dimensions
P1 Each lot has an area and dimensions such that it:
(i) is suitable for the range of likely uses;
(ii) offers a high level of utility and amenity for its subsequent use and the use of adjoining allotments by providing ample opportunity for the separation of uses within adjoining lots;
(iii) where in the Higher Density Residential zone, is able to be developed to achieve the desired dwelling unit density levels for the zone; and
(iv) does not prejudice the desired future use of the land such that:
a) suitable access is provided for pedestrians, cyclists, and vehicles; and
b) adequate provision is made for any other area necessary for the conduct of the intended use for the site;
(v) takes account of the physical characteristics of the site; and
(vi) provides efficient servicing of the lot.
S1 No solution specified. Complies
The proposed configuration improves the usability of Lot 21 and will provide for a more uniform interface of the school with the adjoining residential uses once this lot and the adjoining lot to the west, 14 Short Street is configured in a similar manner.
17 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
Table 9-18 Specific Outcomes and Acceptable and Probable Solutions for the Reconfiguration of a Lot Code
Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable
Solutions Outcomes Achieved
Assessable Development
P2 Each lot is consistent with the minimum area and dimensions as set out in Table 9-18.1 Minimum Area & Dimensions.
Table 9-19.1 Minimum Area & Dimensions
Zones Area Frontage
Rural 100ha
Rural Residential
1ha 60m
Industry (Low Impact)
Refer to acceptable
probable solution S2
Industry (High Impact)
Refer to acceptable
probable solution S2
City Centre Zones (1)
No minimum area or dimension specified
Commercial No minimum area or dimension specified
Public Purposes
No minimum area or dimension specified
Sport & Recreation
No minimum area or dimension specified
Open Space No minimum area or dimension specified
Special Activities
No minimum area or dimension specified
Zones Area Frontage
Urban Residential
Minimum 300m²
10m
Higher Density Residential
800m² 20m
Village 1000m² 20m
S2
Zones Area Frontage
Industry (Low Impact)
2,500m²
30m
Industry (High Impact)
3,500m²
35m
Note: Proposals involving lots with an area less than the minimum area set out in the acceptable solution must provide lot layout plans for each of with an area less than the minimum. The lot layout plans must demonstrate that the relevant vehicle size (refer to Schedule 2, Table 12-2) can enter and leave each lot in forward motion after performing no more than a three point turn.
Complies
The proposal achieves the minimum lot sizes and dimensions.
18 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
Table 9-18 Specific Outcomes and Acceptable and Probable Solutions for the Reconfiguration of a Lot Code
Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable
Solutions Outcomes Achieved
Assessable Development
P4 Irregular shaped lots are designed to have:
(i) a frontage to depth ratio of no more than 1:3;
(ii) for land in the Urban Residential Zone:
a) a minimum frontage of 10m to any cul-de-sac road or along any curved road alignment; and
b) in area within the lot with the minimum dimensions of 15 by 15m; and
(iii) for land in the Higher Density Residential Zone, a minimum width of 20m at a point 6 m in the lot parallel to the longest road frontage.
S4 No solution specified. N/A
Road Layout and Design
P4 All lots have frontage to a road. S4 Lots do not rely on an easement for access to a road.
Complies
All lots will retain road frontage
Note: provisions not applicable to the development have not been addressed.
The proposal therefore complies with the Reconfiguration of a Lot Code.
8.4.3 Environment and Infrastructure Code
The following provides an assessment against the Environment and Infrastructure Code.
Table 9-8 Specific Outcomes and Acceptable & Probable Solutions for the Environment and Infrastructure Code
Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable
Solutions Outcomes Achieved
Assessable Development
Infrastructure
Infrastructure Provision
19 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
Table 9-8 Specific Outcomes and Acceptable & Probable Solutions for the Environment and Infrastructure Code
Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable
Solutions Outcomes Achieved
Assessable Development
P1 Adequate infrastructure is provided in time to meet the needs of the development.
S1 The timing for provision of infrastructure for development complies with the standards and contribution requirements detailed in the Engineering Design Guidelines Planning Scheme Policy
Complies
The proposal can be serviced by existing infrastructure.
P3 Premises have
o an adequate, safe and reliable supply of water, including potable water, and is connected, where possible, to an existing reticulated water supply.
o The planning and design of potable water infrastructure considers Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) such as water conservation initiatives.
S3.1 Premises are connected to Council’s reticulated water supply system.
S3.2 If connection to Council’s reticulated water supply system is not possible, a potable water supply is provided in accordance with the standards detailed in the Engineering Design guidelines Planning Scheme Policy).
Complies
P4 Treatment and disposal of waste water ensures:
(i) no adverse ecological impacts on the environment, particularly nearby receiving environments including surface waters and ground water;
(ii) the cumulative impacts of on site waste water treatment will not cause deterioration of environmental conditions; and
(iii) the planning and design of wastewater infrastructure considers Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) such as wastewater management measures.
S4.1 Connection to Council’s reticulated sewerage treatment system; or.
S4.2 Where connection to Council reticulated sewerage system is not possible, and where 20 people or less, Council will refer to the requirements of the Environmental Protection (Water) Policy 1997 and the On Site Sewerage Code (NR&M July 2002) and AS 1547. to ensure the premises are suitable for effluent disposal.
S4.3 Where more than 20 people, no solution specified.
Complies
20 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
Table 9-8 Specific Outcomes and Acceptable & Probable Solutions for the Environment and Infrastructure Code
Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable
Solutions Outcomes Achieved
Assessable Development
Stormwater Management
P5 Drainage works are designed to ensure that adjoining land and the existing upstream and downstream drainage systems are not adversely affected by development, taking into account:
(i) Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) principles such as:
- protect natural systems;
- enhance natural waterway systems within urban development using natural channel design principles;
- detention of stormwater instead of rapid conveyance;
- minimize impervious areas;
- utilization of stormwater to conserve potable water;
- integrate stormwater treatment into the landscape;
- water efficient landscaping; and
- protection of water related environmental values.
(ii) need for a stormwater system that can be economically maintained;
(iii) safety of pedestrians and vehicles;
(iv) location of discharge;
S5 Drainage works complies with the requirements of the Engineering Design Guidelines Planning Scheme Policy.
Complies
The proposal can be conditioned to provide inter allotment drainage in accordance with Council’s Planning Scheme Policy
21 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
Table 9-8 Specific Outcomes and Acceptable & Probable Solutions for the Environment and Infrastructure Code
Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable
Solutions Outcomes Achieved
Assessable Development
(v) construction of buildings, structures or paving up to site boundaries which avoid blocking or concentrating natural flow paths2.
2 Guidance on the design and construction of drainage systems is provided by the Queensland Urban Drainage Manual 1994.
External Works
P6 Kerb and channelling is provided to a satisfactory standard and constructed to:
(i) prevent edge fretting;
(ii) perform required drainage functions;
(iii) provide the appropriate level of control for vehicle movement;
(iv) allow ready access to abutting properties at suitable locations; and
(v) contribute to the desired streetscape character of the locality.
S6 Premises are provided with kerb and channel in accordance with the Engineering Design Guidelines Planning Scheme Policy.
N/A
No roadworks are required
Roads
22 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
Table 9-8 Specific Outcomes and Acceptable & Probable Solutions for the Environment and Infrastructure Code
Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable
Solutions Outcomes Achieved
Assessable Development
P7 All proposed road pavement surfaces:
(i) are of a quality and durability suitable to the intended traffic volumes and loads;
(ii) provide all-weather access;
(iii) allow the discharge of rainfall;
(iv) provide the safe passage of vehicles and pedestrians; and
(v) provide a reasonable, comfortable riding quality.
S7 Roads are provided in accordance with the Engineering Design Guidelines Planning Scheme Policy.
N/A
No roadworks are required
Drainage Networks
P8 In urban areas, the major drainage network is designed and constructed with the capacity to control stormwater flows under normal and minor system blockage conditions for the DFE applicable to drainage so that:
(i) floodways are restricted to areas where there is no damage to property or hazards for motorists, and
(ii) run off is directed to a lawful point of discharge through competently designed and constructed outlet works.
S8 Design requirements of the Engineering Design Guidelines Planning Scheme Policy.
Can be conditioned
Infrastructure Payments
P10 The costs of providing infrastructure is funded by the development giving rise to the need for the infrastructure.
S10 The funding of infrastructure complies with the requirements of the Contributions Planning Scheme Policy
The proposal does not increase lots (demand) and therefore no infrastructure charges are applicable.
Car Parking and Access
P11 Premises are provided with:
(i) adequate vehicle parking
S11.1 Vehicle parking on the site is in accordance with the rates specified in Schedule 2.
N/A
23 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
Table 9-8 Specific Outcomes and Acceptable & Probable Solutions for the Environment and Infrastructure Code
Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable
Solutions Outcomes Achieved
Assessable Development
spaces to satisfy the anticipated requirements of the activity;
(ii) safe and efficient access and maneuvering areas to meet the anticipated volume and type of traffic;
(iii) large vehicles are able to enter and leave the site without prejudicing the safety and efficiency of the road;
(iv) access driveways are located and designed to minimise conflicts with traffic and pedestrians; and
(v) vehicle crossings from the carriageway to the frontage of the site are constructed and finished to appropriate standards for the excepted volume and type of traffic generated by activities on the site.
S11.2 Vehicles are able to enter and exit the site (with the exception of dwelling house and duplex) in a forward gear.
S11.3 The design of car parking and access complies with the requirements detailed in the Engineering Design Guidelines Planning Scheme Policy
The proposal does not change the existing parking or access requirements
Environmental Amenity
Building Setbacks
P4 Buildings are set back from a road frontage to:
(i) complement the existing built form; and
(ii) preserve the safety of vehicle movement along adjoining roads.
S4 No solution specified. N/A
The proposal does not change the road setbacks to existing buildings on-site.
Flooding
P1 Premises subject to risk of inundation or damage through flood are provided with immunity to that risk in order to reduce potential property damage and to ensure public safety.
S1.1 Development is sited on land that would not be subject to flooding during a DFE; or
S1.2 For development comprising a residential element, the floors of all habitable rooms
Complies
The portion of Lot 21 being reconfigured is not subject to flooding during a DFE and no new buildings are included in the
24 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
Table 9-8 Specific Outcomes and Acceptable & Probable Solutions for the Environment and Infrastructure Code
Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable
Solutions Outcomes Achieved
Assessable Development
are located 300mm above the DFE; or
S1.3 For non residential development or development involving temporary or moveable residential structures (e.g. caravan parks):
(i) buildings are located and designed so that floor levels (except areas used for car parking) are 300mm above the DFE; or
(ii) there is at least one evacuation route that remains passable for emergency evacuations during all floods up to and including the DFE.
development.
Water Quality
P1 Development does not detract from the maintenance of water quality in the City’s watercourses and bulk water storages, in particular its:
(i) environmental values; and
(ii) where applicable, potability of the water supply.
S1 No solution specified. Complies
The proposed boundary realignment will not impact upon water quality.
Sediment and Erosion Control
P1 Minimisation of the risk of erosion and sedimentation either on-site or elsewhere, by a comprehensive approach to soil erosion control and sedimentation management, including:
(i) the minimisation of
(ii) earthworks:
a) clearing of land;
b) long term stockpiling of excavated materials;
S1 The control of Erosion and Sedimentation complies with Planning Scheme Policy 15.07 – Engineering Design Guideline D7 Soil and Water Quality Management.
Can be conditioned
Minimal works are required such that standard conditions can be included to ensure appropriate sediment and erosion control measures are employed under any Operational Works approval.
25 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
Table 9-8 Specific Outcomes and Acceptable & Probable Solutions for the Environment and Infrastructure Code
Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable
Solutions Outcomes Achieved
Assessable Development
(iii) use of appropriate construction management techniques;
(iv) diverting surface water drainage around disturbed areas; and
(v) treating and removing sediments from stormwater over disturbed areas prior to release from the site.
Landscaping and Fencing
P1 Development is provided with adequate and suitable landscaping and screening on the site which ensures:
(i) an attractive streetscape appearance; and
(ii) the privacy and amenity of any adjoining residences.
S1 Landscaping is provided in accordance with the Landscaping Planning Scheme Policy.
Complies
The proposal boundary changes are considered to not warrant additional landscaping.
Vegetation Management
P10 Natural vegetation is maintained wherever possible.
Note: Assessable development being operational work that is clearing of native vegetation of freehold land consistent with Schedule 8, Part 1, 3A of IPA will be assessed under the provisions of the Vegetation Management Act 1999 and the State code for clearing of vegetation on freehold land.
S10 No solution specified. Complies
No vegetation is required to be removed.
Note: provisions not applicable to the development have not been addressed.
The proposal therefore complies with the Environment and Infrastructure Code.
8.4.4 Urban Residential Zone Code
The following provides an assessment against the Urban Residential Zone Code.
26 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
Division 10 Specific Outcomes and Acceptable and Probable Solutions for the Urban Residential Zone in the Mackay Frame Locality
Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable Solutions Outcomes Achieved
Assessable Development
P2 The maximum density of Residential development in the Urban Residential Zone in 1 Dwelling Unit per 400m2
S2 No solution specified.
Complies The proposal will not change the existing population density.
P4 Residential development is able to be serviced with development infrastructure for least cost.
S4.1 Residential development occurs on land in the Urban Residential zone before other land is taken up for residential purposes.
S4.2 Residential development is serviced in accordance with the relevant priority infrastructure plan for the Mackay Frame Locality.
S4.3 Residential development is serviced with development infrastructure either using or extending the existing infrastructure shown on the Information Map – Key Infrastructure.
Complies The proposal can be serviced by the existing infrastructure network.
Note: provisions not applicable to the development have not been addressed.
The proposal therefore complies with the Urban Residential Zone Code.
8.4.5 Public Purposed Zone Code
The following provides an assessment against the Public Purposes Zone Code.
Specific Outcomes & Acceptable and Probable Solutions for the Public Purposes Zone in the Mackay Frame Locality
Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable
Solutions Outcomes Achieved
Assessable Development
P1 Land included in the Public Purposes zone is developed for Public Purposes and has adequate buffer area to minimise impacts on and from adjoining land uses.
S1 No solution specified.
Complies
The proposal will result in a more uniform interface with residential uses that will minimize impacts to the adjoining residential uses.
P2 Land included in the Public Purposes zone protects
S2 No solution specified. Complies
27 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
Specific Outcomes & Acceptable and Probable Solutions for the Public Purposes Zone in the Mackay Frame Locality
Specific Outcomes Acceptable / Probable
Solutions Outcomes Achieved
Assessable Development
future major infrastructure from inappropriate development which may impede the planning, construction and operations of the proposed major infrastructure.
The proposal will not impact upon the protection of future major infrastructure.
The proposal therefore complies with the Public Purposes Zone Code
8.4.6 Coastal Management and Biodiversity Overlay Code
The proposal triggers assessment against the Coastal Management and Biodiversity Overlay Code due
to the northern areas of the site being located within a wetland. The proposed boundary realignment
is not located within this area such that the proposal is considered to not impact upon this wetland
and therefore complies with the Coastal Management and Biodiversity Overlay Code.
8.4.7 Landscape Character Overlay Code
The proposal triggers assessment against the Landscape Character Overlay Code due to the northern
areas of the site being located within the overlay. The proposed boundary realignment is not located
within this area such that the proposal is considered to not impact upon the landscape character and
therefore complies with the Landscape Character Overlay Code.
8.4.8 Landscape Character Overlay Code
The proposal triggers assessment against the Landscape Character Overlay Code due to the northern
areas of the site being located within the overlay. The proposed boundary realignment is not located
within this area such that the proposal is considered to not impact upon the landscape character and
therefore complies with the Landscape Character Overlay Code.
8.4.9 Development in the Vicinity of Mackay Airports Overlay Code
The proposal triggers assessment against the Vicinity of Mackay Airports Overlay Code due to the
northern areas of the site being located within the overlay. The proposed boundary realignment is not
considered to impact upon the safety and efficiency of the Mackay Airport and therefore complies
with the Development in the Vicinity of the Mackay Airports Overlay Code.
28 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
8.4.10 Flood and Inundation Management Overlay Code
The proposal triggers assessment against the Flood and Inundation Management Overlay Code due to
the eastern portion of the site being located within the overlay. The proposed boundary realignment
is not impacted upon by the Defined Flood Event and therefore complies with the Flood and
Inundation Management Overlay Code.
From the above assessment it is evident that the proposal achieves the outcomes sought by the
Mackay City Planning Scheme.
8.5 Relevant State Planning Policies
The Minister for Local Government and Planning identified that the following State Planning Policies
have been appropriately reflected in the Planning Scheme:
1. Development and Conservation of GQAL – SPP 1/92
2. Development in the Vicinity of Certain Airport and Aviation Facilities – SPP 1/02
3. Planning and Managing Development involving Acid Sulfate Soils – SPP2/02
4. Mitigating the Adverse Impacts of Flood, Bushfire and Landslide – SPP 1/03
Therefore, in the assessment of the development application against the relevant codes of the
Planning Scheme, the requirements and provisions of the State Planning Policies relevant to the site
have been considered. No State Planning Policies are relevant to the proposal.
8.5.1 SPP 3/11 – Coastal Protection
The proposed boundary realignment is considered to achieve the intent and overall outcome of the
policy by:
• being located outside of coastal hazard areas;
• not impacting upon areas of ecological significance; and
• not prejudicing coastal land with non-coastal dependant development.
The proposal is therefore considered to comply with the SPP 3/11 – Coastal Protection
8.6 Relevant Planning Scheme Policies
The proposal can be appropriately conditioned to comply with the relevant Planning Scheme Policies.
29 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
9.0 Conclusion of Assessment
10.1 Summary
Having assessed the proposal against the relevant planning instruments the proposal complies with
the provisions and policy intent. The proposal is for a boundary realignment which is an improvement
upon the current configuration in that a more uniform interface with the adjoining residential
development and the Mackay Christian College is achieved.
The proposal should therefore be approved with reasonable and relevant conditions.
30 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
11.0 Appendices
11.1 IDAS Application Forms
QPlanDepartment of Infrastructure and Planning
Integrated Development Assessment System form
You MUST complete ALL questions unless the form indicates otherwise. Incomplete forms or forms without all necessary information and documentation will result in your application not being a properly made application.
For all development applications, you must:
• complete this form (Application details - IDAS form 1)
• complete any other forms relevant to your application
• provide any mandatory supporting information identified on the forms as being required to accompany your application.
All terms used on this form have the meaning given in the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 or the Sustainable
Planning Regulation 2009.
(Sustainable Planning Act 2009 version 1.0 effective 18 December 2009)
Application Details - IDAS form 1
Applicant details (note: the applicant is the person responsible for making the application and need not be the owner of the land. The applicant is responsible for ensuring the information provided on all IDAS application forms is correct. Any development permit or preliminary approval that may be issued as a consequence of this application will be issued to the applicant.)
Please note: If there is more than one applicant, provide additional applicant details by clicking the "Add another applicant" button below.
Name/s (individual or company name in full)Mackay Christian Colleges Ltd
C/- Whitsunday Surveys
For companies, contact name Damien Frey
Postal address PO Box 158 Mackay Qld 4740
Contact phone number 4951 2911
Mobile number (non-mandatory)
Fax number (non-mandatory)
e-mail address (non-mandatory) [email protected]
1. What is the nature of development proposed? (tick all applicable boxes)
material change of use of premises
building work
operational work
reconfiguring a lot
Application Details - IDAS form 1
Version 1.0 18 December 2009
2. What type of approval is being sought?
development permit
preliminary approval
both - provide details below
3. Is the application for a mobile and temporary environmentally relevant activity (ERA)?
No
Yes - complete table A and then go to question 5
4. Location of the premises (complete table B and/or table C as applicable. Identify each lot in a separate row)
Table B - street address/lot for the premises or street address/lot on plan for the land adjoining or adjacent to the premises
Street No.
Street name and official suburb/locality name
Lot on plan
description
Lot No.Post code
Plan type and plan no.
Local government area
(e.g. Logan,Cairns)Unit No.
Street Address
1 12 SHORT ST NORTH MACKAY 4740 2 RP717286 Mackay Regional Council
Street address / lot on plan
Street address / lot on plan for the land adjoining or adjacent to the premises (appropriate for development in water e.g. jetty, pontoon)
2 9QUARRY ST NORTH MACKAY
4740 21 SP230942 Mackay Regional Council
Street address / lot on plan
Street address / lot on plan for the land adjoining or adjacent to the premises (appropriate for development in water e.g. jetty, pontoon)
Northing LatitudeEasting Longitude
DatumLocal government
area (If applicable)
Zone
reference
Table C - premises coordinates (appropriate for development in remote areas, over part of a lot or in water e.g. channel dredging in Moreton Bay)
Coordinates (note: place each set of coordinates in a separate row)
1
GDA94
WGS84
other
Mackay Regional Council
2
GDA94
WGS84
other
Mackay Regional Council
5. Total area of the premises on which the development is proposed (indicate hectares or m²)
32,812 m²
Application Details - IDAS form 1
Version 1.0 18 December 2009
6. Current use/s of the premises (e.g. vacant land, house, apartment building, cane farm, etc.)
1 Educational Establishment
7. Provide a brief description of the proposal (e.g. six unit apartment building, 30 lot residential subdivision etc.)
Educational Establishment
8. Is owner's consent required for this application? (refer to notes at the end of this form for more information)
No
Yes - complete either table D, table E or table F as applicable
Table D (note: do not complete this table if lodging the application on-line using Smart eDA)
Name of owner/s of the land
I/We, the above-mentioned owner/s of the land, consent to the making of this application.
Signature of owner/s of the land
Date
Table E
Name of owner/s of the land Mackay Christian Colleges Ltd
The owner's written consent is attached or will be provided separately to the assessment manager
Table F
Name of owner/s of the land
By making this application, I, the applicant, declare that the owner has given written consent to the making of the application.
9. Does the application involve a state resource? (e.g. the application involves state land, or taking quarry materials. Refer to the notes at the end of this form for more information)
No Yes - complete table G
10. Identify if any of the following apply to the premises (tick applicable box/es)
adjacent to a water body, watercourse or aquifer (e.g creek, river, lake, canal) - complete table H
on strategic port land under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 - complete table I
in a tidal water area - complete table J
Application Details - IDAS form 1
Version 1.0 18 December 2009
No Yes - ensure the type, location and dimension of each easement is included in the plans submitted
11. Are there any existing easements on the premises? (e.g. for vehicular access, electricity, overland flow, water, etc.)
12. Does the proposal include new building work or operational work on the premises? (including any services)
No Yes - ensure the nature, location and dimensions of proposed works are included in plans submitted
13. Is the payment of a portable long service leave levy applicable to this application? (refer to the notes at the end of this form for more information)
No - Go to question 15 Yes
15. Has the local government agreed to apply a superseded planning scheme to this application under
section 96 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009?
No
Yes - provide details below
16. List below all of the forms and supporting information that accompany this application (include all IDAS forms, checklists, mandatory supporting information etc. that will be submitted as part of this application. Note: this
question does not apply for applications made online using Smart eDA)
Method of lodgement to
assessment managerDescription of attachment or title of attachment
1
17. Applicant's declaration
By making this application, I declare that all information in this application is true and correct (note: it is unlawful to provide false or misleading information).
Application Details - IDAS form 1
Version 1.0 18 December 2009
Notes for completing this form
Question 8:
• Section 263 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 sets out when the consent of the owner of the land is required for an application. Section 260(1)(e) of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 provides that if the owner's consent is required under section 263, then an application must contain, or be accompanied by, the written consent of the owner, or include a declaration by the applicant that the owner has given written consent to the making of the application. • Owner's consent is not required for a mobile and temporary ERA.
Question 9:
• Section 264 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 provides that if a development involves a state resource, a regulation may require the application to be supported by certain evidence prescribed under the regulation. Schedule 14 of the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009 prescribes the state resources for which evidence is required to be given, and the evidence required, to support the application.
Question 13:
• The Building and Construction Industry (Portable Long Service Leave) Act 1991 prescribes when the portable
long service leave levy is payable. • The portable long service leave levy amount and other prescribed percentages and rates for calculating the levy are prescribed in the Building and Construction Industry (Portable Long Service Leave) Regulation 2002.
Question 14:
• The portable long service leave levy need not be paid when the application is made, but the Building and
Construction Industry (Portable Long Service Leave) Act 1991 requires the levy to be paid before a development permit is issued. • Building and Construction Industry Notification and Payment Forms are available from any Queensland post office or agency, on request from QLeave, or can be completed on the QLeave website at www.qleave.qld.gov. au. For further information contact QLeave on 1800 803 481 or www.qleave.qld.gov.au.
Privacy -the information collected in this form will be used by the Department of Infrastructure and Planning (DIP) in accordance with the processing and assessment of your application. Your personal details will not be disclosed for a purpose outside of the IDAS process, except where required by legislation (including the Right to Information Act 2009) or as required by Parliament. This information may be stored in a departmental database. The information
collected will be retained as required by the Public Records Act 2002.
OFFICE USE ONLY
Date received Reference numbers
NOTIFICATION OF ENGAGEMENT OF A PRIVATE CERTIFIER
To: Council. I have been engaged as the private certifier for the building work referred to in this application.
Building classification/s
Date of engagement
BSA Certification license number
Name
Application Details - IDAS form 1
Version 1.0 18 December 2009
QLeave Project Number
Date paidDescription of the workAmount paid ($)
Date receipted form sighted by assessment manager
Name of officer who sighted the form
QLEAVE NOTIFICATION AND PAYMENT (for completion by assessment manager or private certifier if applicable)
1
The Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (SPA) is administered by the Department of Infrastructure and Planning. This form and all other required application materials should be sent to your assessment manager and any referral agencies.
Integrated Development Assessment System Checklist
(Sustainable Planning Act 2009, version 1.0 18 December 2009)
Development assessment checklist - IDAS
checklist 1
QPlanDepartment of Infrastructure and Planning
This checklist applies to the carrying out of development generally.
You are not required to complete this checklist as part of your development application, however you may submit the
checklist with your application if you wish. The purpose of the checklist is to assist you in identifying:
• whether you need to make a development application for the proposed development
• if a development application is required, the relevant IDAS forms you need to complete as part of your application
• whether you need to give a copy of your application to any referral agencies.
If your development involves a material change of use, reconfiguring a lot or operational works, it is recommended
that you complete Material change of use - IDAS checklist 2, Reconfiguring a lot - IDAS checklist 3 or Operational
works - IDAS checklist 4, as applicable.
If you are unsure how to answer any questions on this checklist, phone or visit your local government, or go to the
Department of Infrastructure and Planning's website at www.dip.qld.gov.au.
All terms used in this checklist have the meaning given in the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 or the Sustainable
Planning Regulation 2009.
Part 1 - General questions
1.1 Have you received a referral agency response in relation to this proposed development prior to making
an application?
Yes
No
• To assist you in preparing your application, completing Referral agency responses - IDAS checklist 6 is recommended
Yes
No
1.2 Do you wish the proposed development to be assessed against a superseded planning scheme?
• You must complete Request to apply a superseded planning scheme - Sustainable Planning Act form 2 and give this notice to the relevant local government. If the local government agrees to
your request, details must be provided in Application details - IDAS form 1
No
Yes
1.3 Does the proposal involve removing quarry material from a watercourse or lake for which an allocation
notice is required under the Water Act 2000?
• It is recommended that you complete part 2 of this checklist
1.4 Is any part of the proposed development intended to be carried out on a Queensland heritage place under
the Queensland Heritage Act 1992?
No
Yes • It is recommended that you complete part 3 of this checklist
Development application assessment checklist - IDAS checklist 1
Version 1.0 18 December 2009
1.5 Does the proposal involve development on a local heritage place?
No
Yes • It is recommended that you complete part 4 of this checklist
No
Yes
1.6 Does the proposal involve an environmentally relevant activity, other than an agricultural ERA, a mining
activity or a chapter 5A activity?
• It is recommended that you complete part 5 of this checklist
1.7 Is any part of the development on strategic port land or airport land (other than development for a
material change of use that is inconsistent with the land use plan for the strategic port land or airport land)
Yes
No
• It is recommended that you complete part 6 of this checklist
No
Yes
1.8 Is any part of the development on land below a high water mark within the limits of a port under the
Transport Infrastructure Act 1994?
• It is recommended that you complete part 7 of this checklist
No
Yes
1.9 Is any part of the premises designated for community infrastructure?
• It is recommended that you complete part 8 of this checklist
No
Yes
1.10 Does the proposal involve the establishment or expansion of a waste water disposal system?
• It is recommended that you complete part 9 of this checklist
1.11 Is the development on land that adjoins a declared fish habitat area under the Fisheries Act 1994?
No
Yes • It is recommended that you complete part 10 of this checklist
Privacy - please refer to your assessment manager for further details on the use of information recorded in
this checklist.
Disclaimer:
While the Department of Infrastructure and Planning (DIP) believes that this information contained on this
checklist and provided as part of this process will be of assistance to you, it is provided on the basis that you will
not rely on the information without first making your own enquiries regarding the interpretation and application of
the applicable legislation to your circumstances.
To the full extent permitted by law DIP expressly disclaims all liability (including but not limited to liability for
negligence) for errors or omissions of any kind or for any loss (including direct and indirect losses), damage or
other consequence which may arise from your reliance on this process and the information contained on this
checklist.
Development application assessment checklist - IDAS checklist 1
Version 1.0 18 December 2009
Reference numbersDate received
OFFICE USE ONLY
The Sustainable Planning Act 2009 is administered by the Department of Infrastructure and Planning.
Integrated Development Assessment System checklist
QPlanDepartment of Infrastructure and Planning
This checklist only applies when the development application seeks approval to reconfigure a lot.
You are not required to complete this checklist as part of your development application, however you may submit the
checklist with your application if you wish. The purpose of the checklist is to assist you in identifying:
• whether you need to make a development application for the proposed development
• if a development application is required, the relevant IDAS forms you need to complete as part of your
application, and
• whether you need to give a copy of your application to any referral agencies.
You should complete all questions unless the checklist indicates otherwise.
If you are unsure how to answer any questions on this checklist, phone or visit your local government, or go to the
Department of Infrastructure and Planning's website, www.dip.qld.gov.au
All terms used in this checklist have the meaning given in the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 or the Sustainable
Planning Regulation 2009.
The checklist and relevant parts do not need to be completed for applications relating only to building work requiring
assessment against the Building Act 1975.
(Sustainable Planning Act 2009 version 1.0 effective 18 December 2009)
Reconfiguring a lot - IDAS checklist 3
No
Yes
1.1 Is any part of the land located in part of a future state-controlled road or within 100m of a
state-controlled road?
• It is recommended that you complete part 2, question 2.2 of this checklist.
• It is recommended that you complete part 2, question 2.1 of this checklist.
Part 1 - General questions
No
Yes
1.2 Is any part of the premises within a coastal management district?
Section reference:
• Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009, schedule 7, table 2, item 14(a)
• This application requires assessment by the Department of Environment and Resource Management
as a concurrence agency
No
Yes
1.3 Is any lot before the proposed reconfiguration two hectares or larger?
• It is recommended that you complete part 3 of this checklist.
No
Yes
1.4 Is any part of the lot subject to an easement?
• It is recommended that you complete part 4 of this checklist.
Reconfiguring a lot - IDAS checklist 3
Version 1.0 December 2009
No
Yes
1.5 Is any part of the lot situated within 100 metres of a substation site under the Electricity Act 1994?
Section reference:
• Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009, schedule 7, table 2, item 21(b)
• This application requires assessment by the entity responsible for the substation as an advice
agency
No
Yes
1.6 Is all or part of the premises on the environmental management register or contaminated land
register under the Environmental Protection Act 1994?
• It is recommended that you complete part 5 of this checklist.
No
Yes
1.7 Is all or part of the land forming the premises currently used for a notifiable activity, or if there is no
existing use was it last used for a notifiable activity?
• It is recommended that you complete part 6 of this checklist.
No
Yes
1.8 Is all or part of the land forming the premises used for an industrial activity (other than mining
activity or petroleum activity) or, if there is no existing use, was it last used for an industrial activity
(other than for a mining activity or petroleum activity)?
• It is recommended that you complete part 7 of this checklist.
No
Yes
1.9 Is all or part of the premises in an area for which an area management advice has been given for
natural mineralisation or industrial activity (other than for a mining activity or petroleum activity)?
• It is recommended that you complete part 8 of this checklist.
No
Yes
1.10 Is all or part of the premises in an area for which an area management advice has been given for
unexploded ordnance?
• You must complete Contaminated land - IDAS form 24
• This application requires assessment by the Department of Environment and Resource
Management as a concurrence agency
Section reference:
• Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009, schedule 7, table 2, item 22(b)
No
Yes
1.11 Is any part of the premises within the South East Queensland (SEQ) designated region?
• It is recommended that you complete part 9 of this checklist.
No
Yes
1.12 Is any part of the premises within the Far North Queensland (FNQ Region) designated region?
• It is recommended that you complete part 10 of this checklist.
Reconfiguring a lot - IDAS checklist 3
Version 1.0 December 2009
1.13 Is any part of the premises in an interim koala habitat protection area identified under the South East
Queensland Koala state planning regulatory provisions (SEQ Koala SPRP)?
Yes
No • It is recommended that you complete part 11 (starting from question 11.3) of this checklist.
• It is recommended that you complete part 11 (starting from question 11.1) of this checklist.
No
Yes
1.14 Is the proposed reconfiguration in connection with the construction of a canal?
Section references:
• Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009, schedule 7, table 2, item 14(b)
• South East Queensland Koala State planning regulatory provisions
• You must complete Tidal work and coastal management district - IDAS form 23
• This application needs to be assessed by the Department of Environment and Resource
management as a concurrence agency
No
Yes
1.15 Is the proposed reconfiguration in an area declared to be a catchment area under the Water Act
2000?
• It is recommended that you complete part 12 of this checklist.
Yes
No
1.16 Is the proposed reconfiguration of a lot for a purpose or on land mentioned in Schedule 9 of the
Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009 and does it exceed the specified threshold for the purpose or
land?
Section references:
• Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009, schedule 7, table 2, item 33
• Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009, schedule 9
• This application needs to be assessed by the Department of Transport and Main Roads as
concurrence agency
Yes
No
1.17 Is the proposed reconfiguration related to rail transport development and listed in Schedule 10 of the
Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009 and does it meet the specified threshold?
Section references:
• Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009, schedule 7, table 2, item 34
• Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009, schedule 10
• This application needs to be assessed by the Department of Transport and Main Roads as
concurrence agency
No
Yes
1.18 Does the proposed reconfiguration result in more than 10 lots or any lot created is less than five
hectares in area?
• It is recommended that you complete part 13 of this checklist.
Reconfiguring a lot - IDAS checklist 3
Version 1.0 December 2009
1.19 Does the proposed reconfiguration involve a lot sharing a common boundary with a lot that
comprises or contains a Queensland Heritage place under the Queensland Heritage Act 1992?
No
Yes
Section reference:
• Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009, schedule 7, table 2, item 46
• This application needs to be assessed by the Department of Environment and Resource
Management as an advice agency
1.20 Can the proposed reconfiguration of a lot be performed without the removal, destruction or damage
of marine plants under the Fisheries Act 1994?
No
Yes
• It is recommended that you complete part 14 of this checklist.
No
Yes
2.1 Is the proposed reconfiguration listed in Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009, schedule 11 and
does it exceed the threshold?
• This application requires assessment by the Department of Transport and Main Roads (DTMR) as
concurrence Agency.
No
Yes
3.1 Is the size of any lot proposed to be created 25 hectares or smaller?
• End of part 3 of this checklist.
Part 3 - Clearing vegetation
3.2 Does any lot subject to the reconfiguration of a lot contain the following?
a category A or B area shown on a Property Map of Assessable Vegetation NoYes
NoYesif there is no Property Map of Assessable Vegetation for a lot, vegetation shown as
remnant vegetation on a regional ecosystem or remnant map
• If no to both, then end of part 3 of the checklist.
No
Yes
4.1 Is there an easement in favour of a distribution entity or transmission entity under the Electricity Act
1994 for a transmission grid or supply network under that Act?
• This application requires assessment by the distribution or transmission entity as an advice agency
Part 4 - Easements
Reconfiguring a lot - IDAS checklist 3
Version 1.0 December 2009
No
Yes
4.2 Is there an easement in favour of the holder of pipeline licence number 1 issued under the Petroleum
Act 1923 for the construction or operation of the Moonie to Brisbane strategic pipeline under that
Act?
• This application requires assessment by the license holder as an advice agency
11.3 Is any part of the premises in a koala conservation area or koala sustainability area identified under
the Nature Conservation (Koala) Conservation Plan 2006 outside the current SEQ urban footprint
area?
Yes
No • Go to question 11.5.
11.5 Is any part of the premises in a koala conservation area or koala sustainability area identified under
the Nature Conservation (Koala) Conservation Plan 2006 which is a Department of Environment and
Resource Management urban footprint koala area?
Yes
No • End of part 11 of this checklist.
No
Yes
13.1 Does the proposed reconfiguration involve a lot situated in, or within 100 metres of, a wetland shown
on the `Map of referable wetlands'?
• This application needs to be assessed by the Department of Environment and Resource
Management as an advice agency.
Part 13 - Wetland
Privacy --please refer to your assessment manager for further details on the use of information recorded in
this checklist.
Disclaimer:
While the Department of Infrastructure and Planning (DIP) believes that the information contained on this form and
provided as part of this process will be of assistance to you, it is provided on the basis that you will not rely on the
information without first making your own enquiries regarding the interpretation and application of the applicable
legislation to your circumstances.
To the full extent permitted by law DIP expressly disclaims all liability (including but not limited to liability for
negligence) for errors or omissions of any kind or for any loss (including direct and indirect losses), damage or other
consequence which may arise from your reliance on this process and the information contained on this checklist.
31 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
11.2 Locality Plan
1
RP722101
FH
675m²
1
RP719808
FH
2135m²
ANDERGROVE
MACKAY REGIONAL
7
RP722652
FH
857m²
8
RP722652
FH
736m²
20
RP722652
FH
726m²
ANDERGROVE
21
RP723344
FH
746m²
ANDERGROVE
27
RP722652
FH
726m²
ANDERGROVE
26
RP722652
FH
746m²
ANDERGROVE
28
RP722652
FH
726m²
29
RP722652
FH
746m²
ANDERGROVE
35
RP722652
FH
726m²
ANDERGROVE
34
RP722652
FH
746m²
ANDERGROVE
38
RP722652
FH
744m²
1
RP817043
FH
804m²
ANDERGROVE
2
RP817043
FH
800m²
3
RP817043
FH
800m²
15
RP817043
FH
800m²
ANDERGROVE
16
RP817043
FH
800m²
ANDERGROVE
17
RP817043
FH
804m²
36
RP817073
FH
1471m²
ANDERGROVE
MACKAY REGIONAL
19
SP122879
FH
700m²
20
SP122879
FH
700m²
34
SP122879
FH
702m²
35
SP122879
FH
820m²
1
SP
200323
2
SP
200323
2
SP200323
0
SP
200323
0
SP
200323
537
CI4384
RE
7.109ha
NORTH MACKAY
MACKAY REGIONAL
1
RP894663
FH
1.53ha
NORTH MACKAY
MACKAY REGIONAL
2
RP708386
FH
1012m²
1
RP708386
FH
1012m²
4
RP716825
FH
1012m²
6
RP718735
FH
6632m²
NORTH MACKAY
MACKAY REGIONAL
3
RP714182
FH
809m²
7
RP
718735
5
RP717878
FH
1012m²
3
RP716023
FH
1120m²
2
RP716023
FH
857m²
1
RP712044
FH
1012m²
NORTH MACKAY
1
RP714182
FH
1080m²
6
RP714182
FH
1298m²
NORTH MACKAY
MACKAY REGIONAL
4
RP714182
FH
809m²
5
RP714182
FH
1298m²
1
RP736456
FH
4.77ha
NORTH MACKAY
MACKAY REGIONAL
187
CI3946
RE
18.24ha
ANDERGROVE
MACKAY REGIONAL
5
RP712722
852m²
4
RP712722
FH
978m²
3
RP736456
FH
3970m²
41
SP130198
LL
9.596ha
NORTH MACKAY
MACKAY REGIONAL
1
M9187
FH
837m²
13
M9187
FH
622m²
1
CI4262
FH
670m²
14
M9187
FH
630m²
2
RP899734
FH
5.457ha
NORTH MACKAY
MACKAY REGIONAL4
RP
736458
2
CI4262
FH
678m²
2
M9187
FH
819m²
2
RP723982
FH
784m²
15
M9187
FH
630m²
3
CI4262
FH
678m²
5
M91183
FH
2595m²
NORTH MACKAY
MACKAY REGIONAL
3
RP723982
FH
784m²
3
M9187
HL
622m²
16
M9187
FH
630m²
4
CI4262
FH
678m²
6
RP707335
FH
1185m²
1
M91111
FH
900m²
2
M9192
FH
981m²
ANDERGROVE
4
RP723982
FH
784m²
17
M9187
FH
630m²
4
M91175
FH
1267m²
NORTH MACKAY
5
CI4262
FH
678m²
3
M9192FH
809m²
5
RP723982
FH
784m²
18
M9187
FH
630m²
4
M91111FH
905m²
6
CI4262
FH
678m²
23
M91204RE
1.4ha
ANDERGROVE
MACKAY REGIONAL
5
RP707335
FH
981m²
5
M9188
FH
807m²
6
RP723982
FH
779m²
19
M9187
FH
716m²
7
CI4262
FH
678m²
7
M91114
FH
7907m²
NORTH MACKAY
MACKAY REGIONAL
4
RP707335
FH
859m²
1
RP717286
FH
1012m²
8
CI4262
FH
678m²
6
M91111
FH
1012m²
3
RP707335
FH
859m²
2
RP717286
FH
1012m²
9
CI4262
FH
678m²
7
M91111
FH
1012m²
2
RP707335
FH
859m²1
RP707335
FH
860m²
10
CI4262
FH
678m²
8
M91111
FH
1012m²
11
CI4262
FH
678m²
9
M91111
FH
1012m²
12
CI4262
FH
663m²
10
M91111
FH
1012m²
11
M9197
632m²
11
M91111
FH
1012m²
12
M9197
640m²
13
M9197
640m²
14
M9197
632m²
31
M9197
FH
632m²
32
M9197
FH
640m²
3
M91132
FH
670m²
12
M91111
FH
1012m²
28
M9197
FH
627m²
15
M9197
FH
627m²
13
M91104
FH
1004m²
38
M9197
FH
627m²
27
M9197
FH
627m²
16
M9197
FH
627m²
37
M9197
FH
627m²
26
M9197
FH
627m²
17
M9197
FH
627m²
1
RP722772
FH
668m²
36
M9197
FH
627m²
2
RP722772
FH
675m²
3
RP722772
FH
675m²
4
RP722772
FH
615m²
5
RP722772
FH
615m²
7
RP722772
FH
615m²
8
RP722772
FH
615m²1
RP807175
FH
5247m²
ANDERGROVE
MACKAY REGIONAL
1
RP899734
FH
779m²
6
RP912995
FH
6095m²
ANDERGROVE
MACKAY REGIONAL
2
RP912995
FH
3370m²
ANDERGROVE
MACKAY REGIONAL
9
RP722772
FH
615m²
A
RP
852588
118
SP153955
RE
5.9ha
NORTH MACKAY
MACKAY REGIONAL
42
SP130199LL
7.782ha
NORTH MACKAY
MACKAY REGIONAL
530
SP177291FH
5500m²
NORTH MACKAY
MACKAY REGIONAL
2
SP176536
FH
648m²
1
SP230450 2
SP2304500
SP230450
0
SP
230450
0
SP230450
B
SP
230942
F
SP230942
D
SP
230942E
SP230942
C
SP
230942
17
SP230942
FH
444m²
18
SP230942
FH
400m²
19
SP230942
FH
407m²
20
SP230942
FH
400m²
21
SP230942
FH
3.18ha
NORTH MACKAY
MACKAY REGIONAL
990
SP230942
RE
6407m²
NORTH MACKAY
MACKAY REGIONAL
G
SP230942
19
C124554 FH
1.636ha
NORTH MACKAY
MACKAY REGIONAL
1
RP710366
FH
814m²
2
RP710366
FH
814m²
4
RP710366
FH
1077m²
549
CI4031
RE
1.1ha
NORTH MACKAY
MACKAY REGIONAL
2
RP739652
FH
5278m²
NORTH MACKAY
MACKAY REGIONAL
1
GTP
70114
2
GTP
70114
3
GTP
70114
4
GTP
70114
5
GTP
70114
6
GTP
70114
7
GTP
70114
8
GTP
70114
9
GTP
70114
10
GTP
70114
11
GTP
70114
12
GTP70114
13
GTP70114
14
GTP70114
15
GTP70114
16
GTP70114
17
GTP
70114
18
GTP
70114
19
GTP
70114
20
GTP
70114
21
GTP
70114
0
GTP70114
FH
3990m²
NORTH MACKAY
MACKAY REGIONAL
0
GTP
70114
1
SP224843
FH
586m²
2
SP224843
FH
649m²
MCMAHON STREET
MCMAHON ST
FR
ITH
ST
LE
SLIE
ST
BA
RB
AT
CT
MO
RR
ISC
OU
RT
NO
RTH
AVENUE
EVANS
RRACE
TESANDS
STREETSHORT
ROAD
LANE
QU
AR
RY
ST
QU
AR
RY
ST
RE
ET
QU
AR
RY
ST
FOULDEN STREET
RO
AD
JU
BO
HAMILTON STREET
HAMILTON ST
GLE
NP
AR
KS
TR
EE
T
GLE
NP
AR
KS
T
ST
RE
ET
CA
ME
RO
N
ST
CA
ME
RO
N
7781
7564
57330
538
47330
45486
19970
190790
1816
1815
131001(D)
130996
537(D)
42465
114147
42459
126488
DCDB
Lot/Plan 21/SP230942
Area/Volume 3.18ha
Tenure FREEHOLD
Local Government MACKAY REGIONAL
Locality NORTH MACKAY
Parish BASSETT
County CARLISLE
Segment/Parcel 61636/133
SCDB Permanent Marks
SUBJECT PARCEL DESCRIPTION
SCALE 1 : 2500HORIZONTAL DATUM:GDA94 ZONE:55
m
50 100 150 200 2500
8755-41322
STANDARD MAP NUMBER
149°10'56".997
21°06'54".212
NORTH MACKAY
0.44 KM
MAP WINDOW POSITION &NEAREST LOCATION
PRINTED (dd/mm/yyyy) 13/07/2012
DCDB 12/07/2012SCDB 13/07/2012;
Users of the information recorded in this document (the Information) accept all responsibility andrisk associated with the use of the Information and should seek independent professional advice inrelation to dealings with property.
Despite Department of Environment and Resource Management(DERM)'s best efforts, DERM makesno representations or warranties in relation to the Information, and, to the extent permitted by law,exclude or limit all warranties relating to correctness, accuracy, reliability, completeness orcurrency and all liability for any direct, indirect and consequential costs, losses, damages andexpenses incurred in any way (including but not limited to that arising from negligence) inconnection with any use of or reliance on the Information
For further information on SmartMap products visit http://nrw.qld.gov.au/property/mapping/blinmap
CLIENT SERVICE STANDARDS
SmartMapAn External Product of
SmartMap Information Services
Based upon an extraction from the
Digital Cadastral Data Base
(c) The State of Queensland,(Department of Environment and Resource Management) 2012.
72 65 00m E
65
66
66
67
67
68
68
69
69
766 32 00 m N
32
33
33
34
34
35
35
36
36
37
37
38
38
39
39
GDA
Queensland Government
21°07'06".258
149°10'47".117 149°11'00" 149°11'06".877
21°07'06".258
21°07'00"
21°06'42".166
149°11'06".877149°11'00"
21°06'42".166
149°10'47".117
21°07'00"
For additional information regarding this SmartMap see page 2.Shading Rules have been applied.
32 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
11.3 Registered Plan
33 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
11.4 Certificate of Title
CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES, QUEENSLAND Request No: 14246764Search Date: 13/07/2012 14:50 Title Reference: 20584133 Date Created: 03/12/1959 Previous Title: 20373002 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No: 714223071 16/12/2011
MACKAY CHRISTIAN COLLEGES LTD A.C.N. 010 555 389 ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 2 REGISTERED PLAN 717286 County of CARLISLE Parish of BASSETT Local Government: MACKAY EASEMENTS, ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1. Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No. 20093167 (POR 119B) ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICES - NILUNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No
** End of Current Title Search **
COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2012]Requested By: D APPLICATIONS ABR Page 1/1
CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES, QUEENSLAND Request No: 14246784Search Date: 13/07/2012 14:51 Title Reference: 50809845 Date Created: 10/05/2010 Previous Title: 20444197 50382786 50382787 REGISTERED OWNER Dealing No: 713174786 13/04/2010
MACKAY CHRISTIAN COLLEGES LTD A.C.N. 010 555 389 ESTATE AND LAND Estate in Fee Simple LOT 21 SURVEY PLAN 230942 County of CARLISLE Parish of BASSETT Local Government: MACKAY EASEMENTS, ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS 1. Rights and interests reserved to the Crown by Deed of Grant No. 20093167 (POR 119B) Deed of Grant No. 20764121 (POR 120) 2. EASEMENT IN GROSS No 601369598 (T703331N) 10/09/1993 BURDENING THE LAND TO COUNCIL OF THE SHIRE OF PIONEER OVER EASEMENT A ON RP852588 3. EASEMENT IN GROSS No 713174797 13/04/2010 at 15:51 burdening the land MACKAY REGIONAL COUNCIL over EASEMENT D ON SP230942 4. EASEMENT No 713174800 13/04/2010 at 15:52 benefiting the land over EASEMENTS B AND C ON SP230942 5. MORTGAGE No 713316615 28/06/2010 at 11:14 NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED A.B.N. 12 004 044 937 ADMINISTRATIVE ADVICES - NILUNREGISTERED DEALINGS - NIL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ISSUED - No Page 1/2
CURRENT TITLE SEARCH DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES, QUEENSLAND Request No: 14246784Search Date: 13/07/2012 14:51 Title Reference: 50809845 Date Created: 10/05/2010
Caution - Charges do not necessarily appear in order of priority
** End of Current Title Search **
COPYRIGHT THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND (DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND MINES) [2012]Requested By: D APPLICATIONS ABR Page 2/2
34 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
11.5 Proposal Plan
35 Planning Assessment Report
30076 ROL 2 into 2 / ©THG 2008
Brisbane
16 Julia Street
Fortitude Valley
PO Box 1038
Fortitude Valley, 4006 Phone (07) 3666 4700
Fax (07) 3257 7326
Mackay
Celestin House
33 Brisbane Street
PO Box 158
Mackay Qld 4740 Phone (07) 4951 2911
Fax (07) 4953 1319
Proserpine
30 Chapman Street
PO Box 177
Proserpine
Qld 4800 Phone (07) 4945 1722
Fax (07) 4945 1375
[email protected] www.wsgroup.com.au
THG WSG Pty Ltd
ABN 55 156 210 052
Trading as Whitsunday Surveys