Merit & Promotion Review Training for
Indefinite Status Academics
Fall 2010
PR TrainingAre You in the Right One?
Indefinite status Successfully completed all term reviewsAdvisors only Training:
• October 25th 10:30 – 12:00 PM • October 28th 1:30 – 3:00 PM
PR TrainingAre You in the Right One?
Definite statusAll Academic Coordinators/AdministratorsNewer AdvisorsTraining:
• October 25th 1:30 – 3:00 PM • October 28th 10:30 – 12:00 PM
Agenda Welcome/Introductions Agenda/Training Agreements/Outcomes Overview of Process New for 2010-2011 Streamlined Merits PR Dossier
• E-book: walk through thematic guidelines Questions/Wrap-up
Presenters
Academic Assembly CouncilPersonnel Committee Members
Academic Personnel UnitKim Rodrigues
AAC Personnel Committee Work with UC ANR Academic Personnel Unit to
Coordinate the academic merit & promotion process. Assures process is fair and understandable. Facilitates training with UC ANR APU. Nominates Ad hoc review committees. Provides Ad hoc committee chair training. Reviews Ad hoc committee reports for constructive,
mentoring advice that helps an academic improve in the future.
Thank You for Your Support and Expertise:
AAC PC Committee• Mary Bianchi, Dave Campbell, Allan Fulton, Pam Geisel, Janine
Hasey, Gerald Higginbotham, Marilyn Johns, Steve Koike, David Shaw, Dorothy Smith, Scott Stoddard
Academic Personnel Unit• Kim Rodrigues, Executive Director• Andra Strads, Personnel Analyst• Pam Tise, Executive Assistant
Training Agreements Mute phone until you want to speak.
Press *6 to mute and *7 to unmute. Silence cell phones/other noise makers. Do not put call on “hold” (problem with music). May type questions via the chat function on your
computer screen. If you ask questions verbally, state your name
followed by a concise question. One person speak at a time.
OutcomesIncreased knowledge of new procedures.Understanding of the thematic PR
format.Understanding of streamlined merit
process.Increased knowledge of how to develop a
well written PR.Answers to your PR questions.
New UC ANR OrganizationStructure(s) with respect to academic
review process.Peer Review Committee – chaired by ED
APU – composed of 7 peers:• Chris Greer, John Harper, Janet Hartin, Chuck
Ingels, Shirley Peterson, Lynn Schmitt-McQuitty, Eta Takele
Peer Review Committee
Reviews terms, promotions, accelerations, and upper level merits as well as any special cases upon request of the candidate or supervisor.
Peer Review Committee Perspective Your PR is your chance to tell your story. Presentation is important because:
• You want the reviewer to enjoy reading your dossier! • It needs to be easily understood by people in other
programs. Each reviewer has a unique perspective:
Keep in mind the perspectives of those reading your PR: supervisor (e.g. CD), Ad hoc Committee and /or members of Peer Review Committee.
Reviewers may not be familiar with you or your specific program.
Any more questions regarding Peer Review Committee?
Ad hocAd hocs will be streamlined this year to
ensure consistent review for all program areas and expectations for each rank and step.
Ad hocs will be established for all promotions:• Assistant to Associate• Associate to Full Title• Full Title V to Full Title VI
APU AAC
Academic Personnel will work with AAC Personnel Committee to recommend the Ad hocs to AVP-P Barbara Allen-Diaz
CD ReviewAdvisors with CD Assignments
CD’s are reviewed by Bill Frost, Barbara Allen-Diaz or Don Klingborg in the Annual Evaluation and Merit and Promotion Process.
AVP-P Barbara Allen-Diaz receives all recommendations in order to make informed decisions.
For Advisors
• Merits: Advisors CD PRC • CDs Supervisor (Barbara, Bill or Don) PRC
• Promotions: Advisors CD Ad hoc PRC
Ad hocs to be developed for specific actions: Assistant to Associate, Associate to Full Title and Full Title V to Full Title VI.
• Term Reviews: Advisors CD PRC• Accelerations: Advisors CD PRC
Decisions
AVP-P receives recommendations and makes decisions.All appeals go to VP Dooley.
A Good PR is…ACCURATE: Be factual, tell how impacts were
achieved.BRIEF: Make every word work.
CLEAR: Say what you mean.
SPECIFIC: Use examples.
PROFESSIONAL: Make it look professional – adhere to format guidelines.
Make Your Dossier Enjoyableto Read!
Reviewers find it less enjoyable to read if they have to tease out information.
State your overarching program themes.Identify your clientele/audiences.Write clear goals and objectives.Summarize your accomplishments.Remember what is obvious to you, may not be
obvious to all readers -- make it obvious!
General TipsStart as early as possible.Use your records.Use web examples referenced in e-book.Review and edit; then review and edit
some more.Ask questions.Ask peers to review your work.
General DirectionsFont: Times New Roman 11 or 12Margins: 1 inch all aroundAdhere to page limitsPlease refer to the e-book found at
http://uncanr.org/pr-ebookTip: Be kind to your readers – use a format that makes
your PR readable.
Fostering Your Success
An excellent presentation, along with high quality work, greatly helps your supervisor write a strong evaluation.
The multi-disciplinary ad hoc(s) will benefit from a concise well-written PR that demonstrates the importance of your program outcomes and/or impacts.
Timeline for PR Process Access will be available as soon as possible
through your portal. Deadline for uploading your PR dossier:
• 11:59 PM, February 1, 2011 (note: you may upload your documents and make
corrections/revisions up until the deadline). Results by the end of June 2011 for July 1, 2011
actions.
What’s New in the PR Process?New in 2010-2011
Only one format: Thematic. Peer Review Committee (PRC) replaces SAC. Program Summary Narrative replaces Self Statement
• 6 page maximum – merit• 10 page maximum – promotion• Supported by tabular lists (Extending Knowledge/Applied Research)
Acceleration Statement limited to 1 page. Professional Competence and University and Public Service
Sections limited to 1-2 paragraph summary supported by documenting lists.
Affirmative Action limited to 1-2 paragraphs highlighting effort.
Thematic Format - our chance to explain our program
Theme: your program focus; subject matter expertise; etc. – Themes may or may not relate to Strategic Initiatives
Clientele: People or group of people that a program aims to serve. Goals: The purpose towards which an effort is directed. Inputs: The efforts that provide information from which to develop
products (technology, methodology, etc.). Outputs: Products we create from research inputs. Outcomes: Changed knowledge, attitudes, skills, behavior/practices
resulting from effort. Impacts: Social/health, economic, environmental/physical benefits to
individuals, organizations, populations, communities.
A Bit More Detail
INPUTS OUTPUTS OUTCOMES
Program Investments
Activities Participation Short Medium
What we invest
What we doWho we
reachWhat results
SO WHAT??
What is the VALUE?
Long-term
Examples of Themes from 2009-2010 Cycle
Healthy Families and Communities:• 4H Youth Development
Life Skills Adolescent Development Extension Education Science, Engineering and Technology
Examples of Themes from 2009-2010 Cycle
Food, Nutrition:• Childhood Obesity• Healthy Individuals, Families and Communities• Consumer Food Safety• Food Security
Examples of Themes from 2009-2010 Cycle
Sustainability and Viability of Agriculture:• Sustainable Food Systems• Science and Agriculture Literacy• Organic Crop Production• Ag Productivity, Efficiency and Sustainability• Waste Management
Examples of Themes from 2009-2010 Cycle
Sustainable Use of Natural Resources:• Sustainable Natural Ecosystems• Sustainable Natural Resources• Water Quality, Quantity and Security• Water Conservation and Irrigation Quality
Examples of Themes from 2009-2010 Cycle
Landscape Management:• Wildland/Urban Interface• Wildfire Education
Questions about general directions or format?
Streamlined MeritsWho Currently Qualifies for a Streamlined
Merit?• Academic Coordinators with one positive AE
and Supervisor Support• Assistant, Associate or Full Title I-V Advisors
with positive AE(s) and Supervisor Support
Streamlined MeritsComponents
Upload (by November 19, 2010): This year’s annual evaluation (AE)Upload (by 11:59 PM February 1, 2011): Position description(s) for period under review Program Summary Narrative (6 pages maximum) Bibliography for entire career
Note: Your previous annual evaluations for the period under review are already on your portal.
Streamlined MeritsProvide a Program Summary Narrative to
Accompany Positive Annual Evaluations• Follow the general format for a Program Summary
for PRs (themes, context, goals)• Highlight major accomplishments, notable
achievements, outcomes or impacts
Streamlined MeritsDeadlines
Must complete AE & upload by Nov 19th
Supervisor reviews – if AE is favorable and other eligibility criteria are met, then you may use the streamlined process.
Streamlined merit due on February 1, 2011 at 11:59 PM.
Questions about streamlined merits?
Program Review Sections Advisors
1. Position Description2. Acceleration Statement (if
applicable)3. Program Summary Narrative
• Performance in Applied Research and Creative Activity
• Performance in Extending Knowledge and Information
• Professional Competence• University and Public Service• Affirmative Action
4. Professional Competence (documenting lists)
5. University and Public Service (documenting lists)
6. Bibliography7. Publication Examples and
Summary (if applicable)8. Letters of Evaluation (if
applicable)9. Appendices:
• Project Summary Table• Extension Activities Table• Letters of Publication (if
accepted)• Sabbatical Leave Plan and/or
Report (if applicable)
Position DescriptionThe Position Description provides the basis for evaluating your PR: Include all position descriptions that apply to the
review period. Indicate the time period each was in effect. Develop documentation (i.e. PD addendum) for
special assignments, such as acting County Director or new cross county work.
Acceleration Acceleration requires exceptional achievement in at
least one criteria – identify the “driver”. Acceleration requires greater than normal
productivity in all criteria for your rank and step. Highlight activities that you believe warrant special
attention -- do not just repeat descriptions you provide in other sections.
Focus only on the period since the last review. Why do you deserve an acceleration?
Program Summary Narrative SUMMARIZE THEMES
• Provide ContextDescribe counties covered, nature of clientele, factors that influenced program activities.
• Describe Program GoalsInclude how goals were determined, clientele needs assessments, etc.
• Describe Activities, Research Efforts, Outputs, Outcomes, and Impacts
BUILD PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE• Describe professional activities that supported or were derived
from themes.• Include other elements of professional development,
competence
SERVICE• Describe University and Public Service
Program Summary Narrative (cont.) Affirmative Action
• Describe how Affirmative Action tied into program themes and activities.
Highlight your major accomplishments, notable achievements.
Maximum length is 6 pages for merits, 10 for promotions.
Use bullets, indentation, and subheadings to make your statement more readable.
Full Title V - VI Coverage
Program Summary Narrative for your entire career within the Full Title rank.
Bibliography from your entire career. Years since last review: Extension activities table. Years in FT rank: all other components.
• Publication examples can be those submitted in other PR’s in Full Title rank.
• Include all PD’s from all years in Full Title rank.
Professional CompetenceIn the Program Summary Narrative you summarize activities (in one to two paragraphs) that you:
• Participated in training to become more competent• Are viewed as competent by peers & clientele
In this Professional Competence section, list items by themes presented in your Program Summary.Divide activities into 2 sections:
• Professional Development & Training Training, professional society meetings, memberships, etc. Workgroups (not included elsewhere in PR) and role Non-workgroup activities
• Evidence of Professional Competence Editing books, reviewing articles, professional offices held,
presentations at professional society meetings, etc. Awards, recognition
University and Public Service
In the Program Summary Narrative you summarize (in one to two paragraphs) that you served the university and the public (all of which generally do not pertain to clientele).
In this Service section, list items in two categories:University Service
• Committees, task forces, workgroups, etc.• Leadership roles.
Public Service• Activities and events in which you used your professional expertise to
benefit groups or efforts outside the University. Indicate who benefited. Indicate recognition you received.
(note: activities listed here should relate to your field of expertise or your ANR assignment).
Affirmative ActionThis is a place to describe your efforts and successes in reaching under-served audiences. Summarize your AA accomplishments as related
to your position description.
Limit this section to 1-2 paragraphs.
Theme Example (examples borrowed from UC Delivers)
Conserving water in agricultural systems (Theme)Description of Theme: Water resources are severely limited in both volume and quality in CA. It is critical to assist clientele in conserving water resources and in improving agricultural uses of water. . . .
Goal to address theme: Devise improved systems of irrigation and . .
Research projects: New method for canopy shading measurements; erosion reduction in watersheds; vineyard cover crop and water usage; polymer additives reduce sediment and nutrient losses.
Sample Outline (examples borrowed from UC Delivers)
Role: very brief description (your summary table will provide the details).
Outputs: Findings, writings/publications, new methods and products.
Extension: Brief summary of extension activities related to outputs. How did you extend your products/information to clientele?
Outcomes/impacts as related to overall theme: 20 growers changed practices . . . . Runoff reduced in this watershed . . . . 12 growers used canopy measurement system and altered irrigation scheduling in this manner. . . . Positive impacts on long-term, broader environmental issues. . . .
Merging Projects Into One ThemeProject 1• Developing a canopy shaded area measurement method - The goal was to develop a practical
method for estimating irrigation crop coefficients.• I conceived of this novel method and developed it fully into a practical device (a lightweight
solar panel which is used like a large light meter).• I presented a poster about the solar panel, published an abstract on the method, and gave field
demonstrations.• Outcomes: This method has proven to be efficient, accurate, and above all practical for growers.
This work has enabled growers to gain site-specific data to improve irrigation management decisions.
• Impacts: Having accurate crop coefficients will increase the efficiency of irrigation water use, ensuring economically and environmentally sustainable use of limited ground water supplies.
Project 2• Deficit irrigation trial - The goal was to determine the effects of various levels of irrigation
deficits.• I designed the experiments and conducted every aspect of the field work. I established an
irrigation trial at a commercial vineyard and took detailed measurements for 5 years.• I presented the results at four extension meetings and at an international conference.• Outcomes: By the 4th and 5th seasons there were lower yields in the drier treatments. This
showed that optimum production requires growers to change irrigation practices to supply sufficient water.
• Impacts: This information increases the economic sustainability of production by optimizing irrigation water use from limited ground water supplies.
Conserving water in agricultural systems (Theme)
• Water supplies are under increasing pressure in many parts of California; in particular the groundwater basins supplying many coastal grape production areas are facing increasing withdrawals. For the production of irrigated crops to be sustainable in such areas, irrigation water needs to be used as efficiently as possible. Growers will require improved tools to help them manage irrigation more efficiently, and better knowledge of the optimum irrigation requirements for their crops.
• To fulfill the need to improve water use efficiency, I have been working on projects designed to improve the information available for making irrigation decisions. In one project I have developed a novel method for measuring the canopy shaded area of winegrapes; this is used to calculate the irrigation crop coefficient specific to a vineyard. My lightweight solar panel acts like a large light meter, and offers very quick, inexpensive, and practical measurements of this important parameter, and is in the early stages of adoption by the major winegrape companies in the state. I have given numerous field demonstrations of the method, have presented posters and abstracts, and have constructed six devices for use by industry cooperators. This method is impacting the industry by allowing growers to have site-specific crop coefficients to improve irrigation decisions and thus increase water use efficiency.
• In another project, I have been evaluating the effects that various levels of deficit irrigation have on the production and quality of winegrapes. In collaboration with Dave Goldhamer, UCCE Water Management Specialist, I established irrigation trials to evaluate four different levels of deficit irrigation over five seasons. Only minimal differences were noted in the first three seasons, but by the fourth season the yields of the two drier treatments showed significant yield declines. This information was presented at an international winegrape conference, and has also been presented in local extension meetings. This work demonstrates that sustainable production requires that growers change their irrigation practices to supply a certain minimum amount of irrigation water. These projects will ensure that winegrape production is economically and environmentally sustainable by optimizing irrigation water use efficiency.
Finished Product(example borrowed and modified from S. Murdock)
Support Adolescent Leadership Development (1 of 3 themes)
• Includes 3 projects: Develop and deliver summer program; Develop workshops and handouts; Conduct statewide survey re: youth leadership.
• Background and rationale: Strong leadership is a characteristic of healthy communities. It is critical to identify and develop leadership potential in our youth. . . .
• Goal and purpose: Develop programs to build teen leadership.
Sample Outline• Role: I identified stake-holders (such as County Office of Ed.)
for this effort, joined relevant workgroups (Adolescent Development Wkgp), organized programs focused on leadership. . . .
• Creative activity/extension: Developed a summer program, delivered program (including Family Science Night presentation), developed materials in Spanish, developed survey to discover other leadership programs in California. . . .
• Outputs: Program outline in English and Spanish, survey data on other leadership programs for teens. . . .
• Outcomes/impacts: Documentation from teens regarding increased teaching skills, interest in science. . . .
Additional Examples of PR
• Will be posted on the website http://ucanr.org/meritpromotion
Questions about these dossier components?
Bibliography Include a Bibliography Summary that indicates the number of
publications in each category. Present your bibliography according to the appropriate categories
described in the e-book. You do not have to rearrange your current bibliography. Instead,
you may simply indicate the category (A-E) next to each entry, if you choose to use these categories.
For citations added during the current review period, annotate each multi-author citation with a sentence identifying your activity/role.
Highlight (e.g. bold) or separate (e.g. enclose with border) citations for this review.
You must scan and upload a letter of acceptance for any publication listed as “in press.”
Publication ExamplesRequired for:
PromotionsAccelerationsMerits to Advisor FT VII – IXChoose 3 that best represent your work
• Describe all 3 on a single page preceding the examples
Letters of Evaluation Needed for:
• Promotions• Accelerations• Merits Advisor FT VII to FT IX• 3rd Term Reviews
Candidate provides names of up to 6 references; may also give names of those not suitable to serve as reference.
Supervisor uses these and may add ones of their own.
All letters received are included with dossier. You will not see the letters.
Project Summary Table
Use the themes/goals you used to organize your narrative to subdivide the Project Summary table.
List projects, including the ones that do not have specific grants or financial support.
Include: title of project and duration; your role; first initial and last name, and institutional affiliation of collaborators; amount of support and its duration (and type if other than money); and the source.
Extension Activities
Only list activities directly related to your program clientele.
List activities for non-clientele groups (e.g. students, foreign visitors, scientific colleagues) in Professional Competence or University and Public Service sections.
Format examples appear in e-book.
Other Documents Letters of publication acceptance. (if applicable) Sabbatical leave plan and report. (if applicable) Definitions of acronyms. (if applicable)
Additional Questions?
Need More Help?
Questions: Kim Rodrigues @ [email protected] 530-754-8509 ORAndra Strads @ [email protected] 530-752-7532
Important Dates Topic Date Action
AE template available 10/1/2010 Available via your portal
DANRIS-X completionDANRIS-X retrieval
10/25/1010/29/10
Everyone must complete
PR Training –indefinite statusPR Training – definite statusPR Training – indefinite statusPR training – definite status
10/25 - 10:30 10/25 - 1:3010/28 – 1:30
10/28 - 10:30
Adobe Connect + Ready Talk
Annual Evaluation due 11/19/10 Academic must upload by 11:59 PM
AE review by supervisor due 12/17/10 Supervisor meets with academic first
Confidential Letters 1/21/11 Deadline for submission
PR Dossiers Due 2/1/11 Academic must upload by 11:59 PM
Outcomes Check-inHas your knowledge of new procedures
increased?Do you understand the streamlined merit
process?Has your knowledge of how to develop a
well written PR increased?Have all your PR questions been
answered?