Modeling the Characteristics of Finnish WorldSkills Competitors Vocational
Expertise and Excellence
Running head: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence
Professor Petri Nokelainen
School of Education, University of Tampere, Finland
Contact person:
Professor Petri Nokelainen
School of Education
33014 University of Tampere
Finland
Tel: +358 40 557 4994
Fax: +358 3 3551 7502
Email: [email protected]
http://www.uta.fi/~petri.nokelainen
Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research
Association, Vancouver, Canada.
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 2
Abstract
This mixed-method study investigated the role of Finnish WorldSkills Competition (WSC)
participants' natural abilities, intrinsic characteristics, and extrinsic conditions to their talent
development with qualitative (n = 30) and quantitative (n = 64) samples. The results of the
semi-structured interviews with competitors, their parents, trainers, and working life
representatives showed that self-reflection (stress tolerance), volition (perseverance, time
management skills), cognitive skills (development potential), and motivation (extrinsic and
intrinsic) were considered the most important characteristics. Characteristics related to
volition, self-reflection, and cognitive skills played an important role in all three
developmental stages of vocational talent (initial interest, perseverance, and mastery of the
skill). The role of both teachers and trainers was deemed important to the stages of vocational
talent development. The results of the survey showed that the most successful competitors
were characterized by their linguistic and interpersonal abilities. They also believed that effort
was more important to their success than ability. The most successful competitors were more
performance-approach goal oriented and less performance-avoidance oriented than were their
less successful peers. A supportive home and school atmosphere positively affected the
development of vocational talent. Future research directions regarding competitors’
characteristics should include examination of their mindsets, health (lifestyle), hobbies,
safety, and media skills, and also focus more on those WSC skill areas requiring teamwork.
There is demand for a longitudinal research design with control groups that would allow
examination of the long-term impact of natural abilities, intrinsic characteristics, and extrinsic
conditions on the development of vocational talent.
Keywords: vocational education, career and technical education, expertise, excellence,
characteristics, skills competitions
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 3
Introduction
International vocational competitions in different skill areas (e.g., plumbing, hair dressing) are
gaining increasing interest around the world. What started in 1947 as a small regional
competition in Spain has now become the WorldSkills Competition (WSC), a world-
renowned event that draws competitors and visitors from all over the world (56 countries
currently participate in WorldSkills competitions). For example, when Finland hosted the
2005 WorldSkills Competition in Helsinki, more than 40 000 visitors per day watched 700
international competitors working for five days on 45 skill categories. On the national level,
the Finnish Taitaja (“Expert”) competition in 2010 hosted 450 competitors in 40 skill areas
and almost 20 000 daily visitors. By comparison, the SkillsUSA Championships have been
held since 1967 and have become a multi-million dollar event with more than 5200
contestants in 91 separate events.
Whether it is a national or international vocational skill competition, the same parties are
involved: Students participate in training and competitions, teachers from vocational
education institutions train them together with national special units (e.g., WorldSkills
Finland), and industry offers financial support alongside local governments (e.g., Finnish
Ministry of Education and Culture). To determine why and how the system works, we
conducted structured interviews (N = 30) with key actors in Finnish skill competitions during
the preparation phase of this study in 2006 -2007. The non-probability sample included
principals and teachers of vocational education providers (n = 13), corporate sponsors (n =
12), and government leaders (n = 5) involved in WorldSkills Finland operations.
The results showed that providers of vocational education aim to attract capable students
by providing high-quality working premises and up-to-date teaching. Vocational teachers who
train competitors in these skills were motivated to update their knowledge and be recognized
as leading experts in their skill areas. Participating companies reported an interest in raising
their public profile and attractiveness as employers to hire a skilled and motivated workforce.
Government officers aimed to improve the attractiveness and quality of vocational studies and
were keen to see a more suitable match between vocational training (including “soft skills”
such as social, psychological, and ethical skills) and working life requirements.
The results also indicate that both corporate and governmental support for the vocational
skills competitions has impacted on the attractiveness and quality of vocational education at
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 4
the national level. For example, in 2008, for the first time in 30 years, more applicants applied
for vocational (60%) studies than for upper-secondary level (40%) studies in Finland. An
example related to quality improvement is the up-to-date (and very expensive) machinery
used in the national skills competitions that the sponsoring companies donate to the hosting
vocational institutions for teaching purposes.
In this paper, we report on the characteristics and future working life expectations of
young individuals who participate in international skills competitions. Further, we investigate
whether the characteristics of the most and least successful competitors differ. All the Finnish
WSC team members eligible to compete at the international level are considered vocational
experts, but only the most successful competitors represent vocational excellence in their skill
area.
To address these goals, we formulated the following research questions: (1) What
characteristics are specific to WSC competitors? (2) How do the characteristics of WSC
competitors differ during the training period, competitions, and working life? (3) What
characteristics are specific to WSC competitors' initial interest in the field, perseverance in
acquiring a vocational skill, and mastery of that skill? (4) What characteristics are specific to
the employers of WSC competitors? (5) What are WSC competitors’ most essential natural
abilities? (6) What are WSC competitors’ most essential self-regulatory abilities? and (7)
What is the influence of domain-specific and non-domain-specific factors on the talent
development of WSC competitors?
By answering these questions, we can draw some conclusions about the characteristics
typical of young talented workers in various skill areas. An understanding of the relationship
of these characteristics to success in international skills competitions enables us to highlight
the most important factors influencing the development of exceptional vocational talent.
This paper is organized as follows: First, the theoretical components of the
characteristics of vocational expertise and excellence are discussed alongside the existing
body of research. Second, the results are presented regarding the seven research questions.
Finally, the paper discusses the limitations of the study and provides directions for future
research.
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 5
Theoretical framework
In working life, all workers must possess cognitive skills and take part in decision-making
processes. With experts, such skills are linked to a high capacity to analyze domain-specific
information and to understand the basics and the meanings of different work tasks (Ruohotie,
2004). Their cognitive processes are characterized by the complexity of domain-specific
knowledge structures and a deep understanding of related concepts (Pillay, 1998).
However, knowledge structures differ from declarative knowledge. The former relate to
the analysis or parsing of information, whereas the latter describes the accumulated body of
knowledge or learned facts. The structure of knowledge stored in one’s memory may be more
important for learning than the amount of it. Knowledge structures affect subsequent
knowledge parsing and memory-retrieval processes. The retrieval of information from
memory speeds up and deepens understanding, helps in decision making and the anticipation
of future events, and makes it easier to find optimal solutions to problems. (Day, Arthur &
Gettman, 2001.)
In addition, metacognitive skills are necessary in working life. According to Driscoll
(2005, p. 107), “... metacognition refers to one’s awareness of thinking and the self-regulatory
behavior that accompanies this awareness.” Experts have the ability to analyze work-related
non-routine problems. They are able to anticipate the development of their field and take
responsibility for the effectiveness of their work practices. These higher-level thinking skills
are related to cognitive processes, such as critical thinking, problem solving and creative
thinking. Those processes advance professional knowledge, deepen one's understanding of
knowledge, and increase the transferability of knowledge and skills (Pillay, 1998). Thus,
individuals may have strong professional knowledge, but still have extensive shortcomings in
their thinking skills.
Attributions
Attributions are the reasons individuals give for an outcome, such as success or failure in a
task (Heider, 1958). Weiner (1974, 1980, 1986, 1994, and 2000) has shown that factors
involved in attributional thinking, such as specific reasons for success and failure, are related
to achievement settings. In his studies, Weiner found that the four most frequent reasons for
success and failure are ability, effort, task difficulty, and luck.
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 6
Dai, Moon, and Feldhusen (1998) classify attribution constructs into three groups. First,
attribution appraisals are online explanations assessed following actual or manipulated
success or failure in performing a specific task. Second, attribution beliefs are domain-specific
or domain-general beliefs about the causes of success or failure. Third, attribution styles are
generalized, stereotypical patterns of attributions and dispositional beliefs. Attribution styles
are assessed in a similar way to attribution beliefs, except that a certain typology is imposed
on the data using predetermined criteria.
In this paper, attribution styles are examined using Weiner’s (1992) classification of
reasons for success and failure: 1) Origin: Internal and external attributions, referring to
within or outside individual causes; 2) Stability: Stable and unstable attributions, referring to
consistent or inconsistent causes over time; and 3) Degree of control: Controllable and
uncontrollable attributions, referring to the extent to which an individual believes he or she
has control over the cause of an outcome.
Working life requires experts to possess strong professional knowledge, the ability to
transfer their skills and knowledge, and high metacognitive skills. In other words, they must
be both competent and qualified. Competence is the potential capacity of an individual to
successfully complete a certain task according to certain criteria set by someone else
(Ellström, 1994). An interesting point is that a competence may also be seen as an attribute of
an individual (i.e., ‘self-attribution’; see Heider, 1958), for example, referring to a human
resource that the person brings to a mathematical problem-solving situation (Nokelainen, Tirri
& Merenti-Välimäki, 2007). Thus, according to Weiner (1986), self-attributions may
emphasize potential competence as indicated by the capacity of an individual to successfully
complete tasks and to face new challenges on the basis of demonstrated personal attributes
and abilities (other than those obtained through formal training).
Ellström (2001) defines qualification as a competence that is actually required by a work
task or is implicitly or explicitly determined by individual qualities or both. He has noticed
that potential competence may vary greatly between individuals with the same formal
qualifications because they may possess very different levels of inherent ability and may have
learned different things outside of school or their studies through their working life or
recreational activities or both. Williams (2002, p. 103) has defined these efficiency beliefs as
follows: “Trust in one's abilities to plan and execute the activities that lead towards a skilful
accomplishment.” Thus, self-attributions affect subsequent performance expectations and, in
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 7
negative cases, the development or continuation of learned helplessness (Ruohotie &
Nokelainen, 2000).
Self-regulation
According to a social cognitive view of self-regulation, expertise develops from both external
support and self-directed practice sessions (Zimmerman, 2006). Bloom’s seminal study
(1985) clearly showed the importance of both of these factors for exceptional talent
development. Self-regulatory competence has three elements: The self-regulation of covert
personal processes, behavioral performance, and the environmental setting (Bandura, 1986).
Research has shown that successful learners can monitor and regulate these triadic elements
(e.g., Kitsantas & Zimmerman, 2002; Zimmerman, 1989, 1998; Zimmerman & Kitsantas,
2005).
In this study, we applied Zimmerman’s model of self-regulation such that the term ‘self-
regulation’ refers to the process through which self-generated thoughts, feelings, and actions
are planned and systematically adapted as necessary to affect one’s learning and motivation
(Schunk & Ertmer, 2000; Zimmerman, 2000). Zimmerman (1998) describes the self-
regulation of learning tasks as a cyclical, three-phase process. The phases in this learning
cycle are, in this order: forethought (motivation), performance (volitional control), and self-
reflection (attributions).
Analysis of both motivation and volition is necessary to understand why WSC
competitors engage in their required training and wish to become experts in their field. When
the aim is to investigate why some gifted young manual skill workers reach the top level of
vocational talent and others do not, we must also address the role of attributions, that is,
beliefs about success and failure.
Motivation, volition, and self-reflection
To understand individual differences between WSC competitors in the vocational skill
acquisition process, we examined the taxonomy of cognitive, affective, and conative
constructs developed by Snow, Corno and Jackson (1996). Cognition is a generic term for
those processes through which an organism recognizes and obtains information about a
certain object. Cognitive constructs include the following concepts: perceiving, recognizing,
conceiving, judging, and reasoning. Affect is the feeling response to a certain object or idea.
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 8
Sometimes it means the energy resulting from an emotion or a general reaction to something
that one likes or dislikes. Affective constructs include feeling, emotion, mood, and
temperament. Conation refers to those mental processes that help an organism to develop; it is
a kind of intrinsic unrest (the opposite of intrinsic balance or homeostasis) or a conscious
tendency to act or strive for something. Conative constructs include impulse, desire, volition,
and purposeful striving.
Personality and intelligence are the top-level concepts in the taxonomy (Snow et al.,
1996). Personality is rarely limited to personal characteristics, temperament, or emotions
alone. In general, personality includes all those factors that make a person an individual.
Many personality traits are also linked to cognitive factors. Intelligence means, firstly, the
ability to undertake activities which are difficult, complex, abstract, demanding, goal oriented,
socially prestigious, and original; and, secondly, the ability to accomplish these activities in
situations which demand concentration and the control of one’s emotions (Barrow & Milburn,
1990).
The concepts at the next level in the taxonomy — cognition, affect, and conation — are
each further divided into two subcategories. Cognition includes a distinction between
declarative and procedural knowledge. Declarative knowledge is a sort of knowledge network
in which concepts and facts are linked. New knowledge emerges as a result of the
construction of knowledge; in short, analyzing the interdependencies of different pieces of
knowledge. Procedural knowledge can be expressed as a set of procedures or rules that help in
remembering and applying knowledge. This, however, presupposes and depends on
declarative knowledge. Affect is divided into temperament and emotion. Temperament refers
to biological traits that are independent of situational factors, whereas an emotion may be
strongly linked to a given situation. Conation includes both motivational and volitional
aspects of human behavior (Snow & Farr, 1987; Snow & Jackson, 1994).
Motivational aspects cover intrinsic and extrinsic goal orientations, fear of failure, need
for achievement, self-esteem, belief in one’s own abilities and potential (efficacy beliefs),
value of incentive (valence), and different attribution interpretations. Volition includes
persistence, the will to learn, endeavor/effort, mindfulness in learning, intrinsic regulation and
evaluation processes, as well as various control strategies (e.g., allocation and control of
resources as well as emotional attentiveness and motivational control strategies) and styles of
processing knowledge.
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 9
Self-judgment as a sub-component of self-reflection leads to attribution interpretations
in which an individual interprets the reasons for success or failure. The most widely applied
theoretical perspective on attribution interpretations is Weiner’s attribution theory (1974),
which is based on the principle that an individual is constantly searching for understanding of
why an event has occurred. Attribution interpretations can lead to both positive and negative
self-reactions. The individual may interpret the failure of a strategy as the result of too little
effort and then increase his or her subsequent efforts. But if he or she attributes the failure as
due to a lack of ability, the reaction will most likely be negative. Attribution interpretations
reveal the possible explanations for learning mistakes and help the learner to identify those
learning strategies which best suit a given situation.
The conative element of the preceding taxonomy of individual differences in intelligence
and personality is particularly important in the context of self-regulation. According to Corno
(1989), motivational processes help the learner to formulate decisions and to promote
decision-making, whereas volitional processes guide the subsequent enactment of the
decision. It is useful to distinguish between pre-decisional processes of motivation and post-
decisional processes of volition because even highly motivated young manual skill workers
may have problems setting clear goals and pursuing their intentions.
Volition and motivation (i.e., conation) can be explained using various dynamic cycles
(Snow et al., 1996) that connect volitional constructs, motivational factors, and learning
outcomes. These connections are strongly influenced by the context (Corno, 1993). One
cannot assume that all WorldSkill competitors function methodically and deliberately, and
that different processes or constructs will affect everyone in the same way. Volition and
motivation depend on the learning task as well as the learner's natural abilities and
reinforcement experiences (how learning has been reinforced previously).
The motivational expectancy model (Pintrich, 1994) offers one way to categorize and
integrate the central elements of self-regulation. This model includes different beliefs or
expectancies, such as perceived competence, test anxiety, perceptions of task difficulty, the
learner’s belief in his or her efficacy, and expectancy of success. The model also includes
concepts relating to volition, namely metacognitive strategies related to persistence
(concentration, determinance), and time and resource management strategies
(methodicalness). A young competitor on manual skills with a strong self-image and high
expectations will put more effort into the learning task and will persist longer, even on a
difficult task, than will a person with a low expectancy of success.
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 10
Although Pintrich’s model deals with learning goals, we complement our approach with
goal orientation theory, which further discriminates between mastery and performance goals,
approach and avoidance goals, and task and ego involvement (e.g., Ames, 1992; Nicholls,
Cheung, Lauer & Patachnick, 1989; Elliot & Harackiewicz, 1996). Mastery goal-oriented
competitors enjoy learning new skills because they find them inherently interesting. They
seek to develop their competence and to aim at achieving mastery and a deep understanding
of their skill area (“I practice a lot because I want to master the skill perfectly”). Their task
and ego involvement is directly related to mastery goal orientation, but in this case, the
attention focuses on the task (Midgley et al., 2000). Performance goal orientations are linked
to approach and avoidance goals, usually labeled performance-approach and performance-
avoidance goal orientations. The former is related to the demonstration of competence,
whereas the latter is related to avoidance of the demonstration of incompetence. In both forms
of performance goals, attention focuses on the self (“Others will see how good I am” or “I
won’t let others see that I can’t complete that task”). Mastery goal orientation could also be
labeled ‘mastery-approach goal orientation’, but there is no need to do so as our approach will
not utilize ‘mastery-avoidance goal orientations’.
An interesting link exists between attributions (self-reflection) and goal orientations
(motivation): Adaptive and maladaptive patterns of learning. The aforementioned attribution
interpretations promote an adaptation process in which the learner is able to apply new
learning strategies to cope with challenging tasks; consequently, self-regulated individuals are
more adaptive and evaluate their performance appropriately (Bandura, 1997). Positive
reactions (e.g., self-satisfaction) reinforce positive interpretations during vocational training
and enhance intrinsic interest in the task, thereby supporting mastery goal orientations.
Maladaptive individuals are unable to change their learning strategies when facing challenges
and may encounter negative feedback that leads to performance-avoidance goal orientations.
Research suggests that performance-approach goal-oriented individuals tend to apply both
adaptive and maladaptive patterns in their learning (Midgley et al., 2000).
We believe that goal orientations play a significant role in WSC training and
competitions and help us to understand more thoroughly why some competitors are unable to
utilize their full potential. It could be that they have more performance-avoidance goal
orientations (maladaptive patterns of learning) than do their peers, who perform more
effectively with the right combination of mastery and performance-approach goal orientations
(adaptive patterns of learning).
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 11
Natural abilities
Gagné (2004, 2010) has developed a Differentiated Model of Giftedness and Talent (DMGT)
which distinguishes the two frequently intertwined concepts of giftedness and talent. The
DMGT comprises of six components: 1) Chance (e.g., genes), 2) Gifts (i.e., intellectual,
creative, socio-affective, sensori-motorical, and other natural abilities), 3) Intrapersonal
characteristics (physical, motivation, volition, self-management, personality), 4)
Environmental conditions (milieu, important persons, provisions, events), 5) Developmental
processes (informal and formal learning and practicing), and 6) Talents (systematically
developed skills).
Gagné’s view of talent development is summarized in the C.GIPE acronym (Figure 1).
Chance (C) assumes a predominant role in the DMGT, as it includes both genetic and parental
endowments that affect one's natural abilities (G, gifts) and intrapersonal catalysts (I). Chance
represents the degree of control over talent emergence in a way similar the way in which
attributions of success and failure are classified within the three-dimensional system (origin,
stability, degree of control) of attribution theory (Weiner, 1986) discussed earlier.
-- Insert Figure 1 about here --
Natural abilities (G) precede intrapersonal catalysts (I), such as motivational constructs.
The reason is drawn from the existing body of research, which shows how IQ scores ‘account
for’ on average five times or more variance in achievement than do measures of motivation
(Gagné, 2004). Further, because practice is based on the existence of self-regulatory
components (I), such as motivation, volition and self-reflection (including attributions),
intrapersonal catalysts (I) precede the practice (P) component. Gagné’s argumentation for the
P component’s position in the C.GIPE causal chain is that in order to excel, one really needs
more than practice alone, but also both gifts and ability to keep things under control, that is,
self-regulation. This leads to the conclusion that intrapersonal catalysts I causally precede
practice P. Environmental influences (E) have been placed in the last position because
differences in ‘normal’ environments does not explain the difference between average and
outstanding achievements.
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 12
Ericsson stresses the role of deliberate practice in the development of talent, stating that
in most fields, to become an expert requires ten years (Ericsson, Krampe & Tesch-Römer,
1993). Subsequent research has shown that the ten year rule is not absolute: in some fields
(e.g., chess, sports), total mastery of the skill requires about six years, and in other fields (e.g.,
music, science) reaching the top level requires 20-30 years of deliberate practice (Ericsson,
2006). His relative approach to the study of the characteristics of experts assumes that the
fundamental capacities and domain-general reasoning abilities of experts and non-experts are
virtually identical (Chi, 2006). The major difference between experts and novices is that the
former are more knowledgeable, through deliberate practice, than are the latter.
However, Gagné’s DMGT is based on a different approach to the study of the
characteristics of experts: the goal of the absolute approach is to understand how truly
exceptional people perform in their domain of expertise (Chi, 2006). In this study, we
differentiate the concepts of ‘expertise’ and ‘excellence’ by the level of natural abilities each
individual possesses. Gifted individuals with exceptionally high levels of natural abilities
(intellectual, creative, socio-affective, sensori-motorical), intrinsic characteristics (physical
characteristics, self-regulation, personality), and auspicious extrinsic conditions (physical,
cultural and sociological milieu, important individuals, programs, activities, awards,
accidents) may achieve vocational excellence through deliberate practice. Individuals who do
not meet all of these conditions may still become vocational experts through deliberate
practice. Not all Finnish WSC team members will achieve vocational excellence in their work
careers, but most will become vocational experts or at least skillful workers (professionals).
Because the DMGT emphasizes the role of natural abilities in the development of
talent, it is sensible to use one of the most well-know categorizations for individual
giftedness: Gardner’s Multiple Intelligence (MI) theory (1983, 1993, 1999). Sternberg (1991)
identifies MI theory as a systems approach similar to his own triarchic theory. MI theory was
first introduced in 1983 with seven dimensions: 1) Linguistic, 2) Logical-mathematical, 3)
Musical, 4) Spatial, 5) Bodily-kinesthetic, 6) Interpersonal intelligence, and 7) Intrapersonal
intelligence. Later, Gardner (1999) discussed the possibility of adding more dimensions, such
as naturalist, spiritual and existential, to the model. In the context of the current study, it is
interesting to observe how WSC competitors view the importance of different areas of
intelligence to their vocational talent development. Further, this study will explore how these
natural abilities are related to the actualization of their potential in the context of WorldSkills
competitions.
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 13
Method
Sample
Structured interviews (n = 30) were conducted in 2007 – 2009 with 14 young Finnish experts
who had participated in WorldSkills competitions in 2005 (Helsinki, Finland), 2007
(Shizuoka, Japan), and 2009 (Calgary, Canada). Eight of the competitors were males (Mage =
21.0, SDage = 1.000) and six were females (Mage = 22.0, SDage = 7.000). In addition, interviews
were also conducted with their trainers, working life representatives, and parents (n = 22).
The participants in the interview study represented the following WSC categories (their
most important connections to the MI theory appear in parentheses): IT/Programming (logical
mathematical, intrapersonal), Web Design (logical mathematical, spatial, interpersonal),
Plumbing & Heating (bodily-kinesthetic, spatial), Beauty Therapy (interpersonal, bodily-
kinesthetic, spatial), Hair Dressing (interpersonal, bodily-kinesthetic, spatial), Stonemasonry
(bodily-kinesthetic, spatial), Catering (bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal), Robotics (logical
mathematical, spatial), Landscaping (bodily-kinesthetic, spatial), and Caring (bodily-
kinesthetic, interpersonal).
Numerical empirical data (n = 64) were collected from the Finnish WSC competitors in
2008 – 2009, who represented the 2007 (Shizuoka, Japan) and 2009 (Calgary, Canada) teams.
The response rate was 77 per cent of the total target population (N = 83). The sample
comprised 44 male (68.8%) and 20 female (31.2%) respondents. The average of the male
respondents was 20.9 years (SD = 1.676), and of the female respondents, 20.8 years (SD =
1.735). The participants of the survey study covered 23 of the 43 WSC categories, thus
accounting for most of the intelligence areas of the MI theory.
The concepts of vocational expertise and excellence used in the survey study were
defined as follows: All the Finnish WSC team members eligible to compete at an international
level were considered vocational experts and were coded into groups B (positions 8 – 11 in
international skills competitions, n = 17) and C (positions greater or equal to 12, n= 17). The
most successful competitors were coded into group A (positions 1 – 7, n = 27), as they
represented vocational excellence in the study. Total sample size in statistical analyses was
61, as competition performance index could not be defined for three competitors.
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 14
Instruments
The qualitative sample was collected to address the first four research questions. Interviews
lasted from 60 to 90 minutes and were recorded in digital video format. They were analyzed
using the content analysis method (e.g., Krippendorff, 2004). The interview framework was
based on the significance of self-regulation, cognitive, and social features in the development
of vocational talent (Greenspan, Solomon & Gardner, 2004; Nokelainen, 2008; Zimmerman,
1998). In addition, the significance of intrinsic and extrinsic goal orientations was examined
on three levels: initial interest in learning a vocational skill, perseverance during the learning
process, and mastery of the skill (Bloom, 1985).
The quantitative sample, addressing research questions 5 – 7, was collected with a
questionnaire containing 124 five-point Likert scale items and two open-ended statements.
The response options on the Likert scale ranged from 1 (totally disagree) to 5 (totally agree).
We also recorded the respondents' demographic (contact details, age, gender) and other
relevant background information (middle school and vocational study GPA, WorldSkills
Competition skill area, experience and success).
The fifth research question concerning natural abilities was investigated using the MIPQ
III (Multiple Intelligence Profiling Questionnaire, Tirri & Nokelainen, 2008). The MIPQ III
measured nine dimensions of Gardner’s Multiple Intelligence theory with 35 statements: 1)
Linguistic (e.g., “Writing is a natural way for me to express myself”), 2) Logical-
mathematical (e.g., “At school, I was good at mathematics, physics, or chemistry”), 3)
Musical (e.g., “I notice immediately if a melody is out of tune”), 4) Spatial (conceptualization
of space, e.g., “When I read, I form illustrative pictures or designs in my mind”), 5) Bodily-
kinesthetic (manual skills, e.g., “I was good at handicrafts at school”), 6) Interpersonal (social
skills, e.g., “I make contact easily with other people”), 7) Intrapersonal (self-knowledge, e.g.,
“I am able to analyze my own motives and ways of action”), 8) Spiritual (communality, e.g.,
“In the midst of busy everyday life, I find it important to contemplate”), and 9) Environmental
(valuation and knowledge of nature, e.g., “Protecting nature is important to me”) intelligence.
The sixth research question regarding self-regulatory abilities was investigated with two
instruments: the APLQ (Abilites for Professional Learning Questionnaire, Nokelainen &
Ruohotie, 2002) and PALS (Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales, Midgley et al., 2000). The
APLQ is a vocational education modification of the Motivated Strategies for Learning
Questionnaire by Pintrich and his colleagues (1991). The instrument consists of six
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 15
motivational dimensions measured with 12 statements: 1) Intrinsic goal orientation (e.g., “I
am very interested in my skill area as well as the new information related to it”), 2) Extrinsic
goal orientation (e.g., “I want to be number one in my skill area in the forthcoming World
Skills Competition”), 3) Meaningfulness of studies (e.g., “I believe that WSC training will be
of practical benefit to me in the future”), 4) Control beliefs (e.g., “I am able to learn even the
most difficult work methods if I practice hard enough”), 5) Efficacy beliefs (e.g., “I am
confident that I will master even the most difficult work methods in my WSC training”), and
6) Test anxiety (e.g., “While doing a routine task in the WorldSkills Competition, I am
concerned about the really challenging upcoming tasks”). The instrument also contains a
learning strategy scale with two dimensions related to volition: 1) Metacognitive strategies in
studies (perseverance, e.g., “I set clear goals for my learning”) and 2) Time and resource
management strategies (methodicalness, e.g., “I usually have enough time to practice before
the competition or other display of my skills”). PALS has three scales measured with nine
items: Mastery goal orientation (e.g., “I try to understand issues presented in the WSC
training as thoroughly as possible”), performance-approach goal orientation (e.g., “My aim is
to show others that I am in the top level in my skill area”) and performance-avoidance goal
orientation (e.g., “I avoid showing others if I am facing difficulties in WSC training
exercises”).
The seventh research question measured the influence of domain- and non-domain-
specific factors on the development of the WSC competitors’ talent. Thirteen questions were
developed on the basis of existing research (Campbell, 1996) and the interviews conducted in
the earlier stages of the study. These questions measured the influence of 1) the Home
atmosphere (“An encouraging home atmosphere”), 2) Friends (“The stimulating influence of
a particular friend”), 3) the School atmosphere (“The stimulating influence of a teacher or
trainer”), 4) Artifacts (“Seeing impressive demonstrations of skill, such as furniture or a
hairstyle”), 5) Work opportunities in the future (“Employment in the future”), and 6) the
Company of people sharing similar interests (“Team spirit amongst the WSC trainees”).
Statistical analyses
The questionnaire data were statistically analyzed with non-parametric techniques due to the
small size of the sample, the mixture of both discrete and continuous measures, and the
possible presence of both linear and non-linear dependencies between the variables. Research
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 16
questions 5 to 7 were investigated using Bayesian Dependency Modeling (BDM) and
Bayesian Classification Modeling (BCM).
BDM estimates the most probable Bayesian Network (BN) based on the available data,
thus allowing the researcher to examine statistical dependencies between observed variables
(Myllymäki, Silander, Tirri & Uronen, 2002; Nokelainen, 2008). The strength of a
dependency between two variables in a BN (i.e., a line connecting two nodes) is evaluated on
the basis of how much the probability of the model would drop if the connection is removed.
The design of the current study enables the investigation of naïve causality (the assumption
that latent causes are absent), as the research evidence is based on multiple data sources
collected over time: the characteristics of WSC competitors were measured during the
training period, and their competition success index (A, representing the highest performers,
and C, representing the lowest performers) was compiled later on the basis of their
performance in international skills competitions. BCM to some extent resembles Linear
Discriminant Analysis, but instead of using mechanistic predictor variable selection methods
(e.g., forward, backward), it uses genetic algorithms (Myllymäki et al., 2002; Nokelainen,
2008). This data mining approach derives the most probable set of predictor variables (BN)
for a given class variable (competition success in this study). The classification accuracy of
the model is provided and compared to the baseline classification accuracy (i.e., classifying
the cases without the BN). The advantage of using these discrete Bayesian multivariate
computation techniques is that they allow linear and non-linear statistical analysis of
continuous and non-continuous variables without the sample size limitation or assumption of
normality (for a more detailed discussion, see, e.g., Gill, 2002; Nokelainen, Silander,
Ruohotie & Tirri, 2007).
Results
Interviews
RQ 1. What characteristics are specific to WSC competitors?
The results of the interview study showed that the following are the essential characteristics of
the WorldSkills competitors (in order of importance): 1) Stress tolerance (calmness, good
nerves), 2) Perseverance (exactness, ability to concentrate, determination, carefulness), 3)
Development potential (manual, perceptive, and problem-solving skills), 4) Competitiveness
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 17
(ambition), 5) Interest in work, 6) Social skills, and 7) Time management skills
(methodicalness). There were no major differences between the views of WSC competitors,
their trainers, parents and working life representatives.
Their essential characteristics were further classified into the following dimensions
according to the theoretical framework (in order of importance): 1) Self-reflection (stress
tolerance), 2) Volition (perseverance, time management skills), 3) Cognitive skills
(development potential), 4) Extrinsic goal orientation (competitiveness, ambition), 5) Intrinsic
goal orientation (interest towards work), and 6) Social skills. (Figure 2).
-- Insert Figure 2 about here --
The significant role of self-reflection can be justified theoretically: Experts stand out
from other professionals because they can recognize and control changes in their emotions
(Day, Arthur & Gettman, 2001; Pillay, 1998; Ruohotie, 2004). In addition, volition plays a
significant role in the development of vocational talent, since the cultivation of natural
abilities to the level of vocational excellence requires perseverance. The small role of social
skills could be predicted, since the WorldSkills competitors interviewed were mostly involved
in individual skill areas (IT/Programming, Web Design, Plumbing & Heating, Stonemasonry,
Catering, Robotics, Landscaping, and Caring), except for Beauty Therapy and Hair Dressing.
The above-mentioned essential characteristics are almost identical to those of American
Olympic medalists in sports (Gould, Dieffenbach & Moffett, 2001) and international academic
Olympians in mathematics, physics, and chemistry (Heller & Lengfelder, 2000; Nokelainen,
Tirri & Campbell, 2004; Nokelainen, Tirri, Campbell & Walberg, 2007; Wu & Chen, 2001).
This observation is supported by earlier studies (e.g., Ericsson, Krampe & Tesch-Römer,
1993) that emphasize the role of deliberate practice in the development of expertise.
RQ 2. How do the characteristics of WSC competitors differ during the training period,
competitions, and working life?
The interviews showed that characteristics related to volition and self-reflection, as well as
cognitive skills (development potential), played an important role in all three developmental
stages of vocational talent (training, competitions, and working life). According to the results
(see Figure 3), volition is the most important characteristic in a competitive situation, and the
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 18
significance of social skills increases when one enters working life. Because the role of social
skills is important to future career development, vocational training providers may wish to
address this issue in their pedagogy (collaborative learning tasks) and curriculum design
(social skills development courses).
-- Insert Figure 3 about here --
Intrinsic (“I want to learn this thing because mastering it is a rewarding experience in
itself.”) and extrinsic (“I want to learn this thing because then, others will also see how good I
am.”) goal orientations had little significance in the three stages of vocational talent
development. It is important to remember, however, that as motivational factors, they have
considerable indirect significance preceding volition in the self-regulation process
(Zimmermann, 1998, 2000).
RQ 3. What characteristics are specific to WSC competitors' initial interest in the field,
perseverance in acquiring a vocational skill, and mastery of that skill?
The first level of the analysis examined external factors that were presumably to be connected
to the development of vocational talent: 1) Individuals directly related to the development of
talent (other members of the work group, trainer, audience, working life representatives), 2)
Individuals indirectly related to the development of talent (parents, other relatives, neighbors,
fellow students), and 3) Artifacts that have affected the development of talent (e.g., books,
films, music, and other works). The influence of each external factor was studied based on the
model of Greenspan, Solomon, and Gardner (2004) with a primary focus on the role of
intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the operation of the aforementioned factors (Connell,
Sheridan & Gardner, 2004).
The second level of the analysis focused on the participants as individuals. On the basis
of Bloom’s (1985) model, competitors’ talent development was analyzed in three stages: 1)
Initial interest in the skill area and training, 2) Perseverance during training, and 3) Mastery of
the skill. In addition, competitors' intrinsic and extrinsic goal orientations were examined.
(Figure 4.)
The results indicated that the role of both teachers and trainers is important in all of the
early stages of vocational development (initial interest, training, mastery). Intrinsic goal
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 19
orientation proved to be more important than extrinsic goal orientation in the development of
interest in a vocational field and mastery of the skill. During the training, extrinsic goal
orientation was reportedly more important than intrinsic goal orientation. Greenspan,
Solomon, and Gardner (2004) have reported similar findings in their studies of the arts. The
results also showed that when the mastery level was achieved, securing future employment
and challenging job opportunities become the most essential factors. The importance of social
motivation (friends, training teammates) remained relatively low in all the stages of the
process.
-- Insert Figure 4 about here --
RQ 4. What characteristics are specific to the employers of WSC competitors?
Both the WorldSkills competitors and their trainers emphasized the importance of challenging
work assignments from their employer. The freedom and responsibility in work assignments
were considered significant to the development of self-esteem and maintaining the motivation
to work. The responses stressed the importance of good leadership even though its content
was not specifically defined. Interviewees pointed out that their superior’s relaxed and no-
nonsense leadership style was especially encouraging.
The competitors expected their future employer to encourage them to develop their skills
and to reward them for it. This finding is related to the valuation of competitive activities that
both the competitors and their trainers mentioned. Based on the interviews, an employer who
really values vocational excellence was expected to pay a decent salary. However, it is worth
noting that salary was regarded as one of the least important features of future work.
Survey
The survey results indicate that middle school GPA is no predictor of vocational skill
competition success. Non-significant but negative correlations were found between skill
competition success and one's grades in middle school math, native language, first foreign
language, religion, music, sports, and handicrafts. Those individuals in group C had slightly
higher certificates of graduation from middle school (MA group = 7.9, SDA group = .773; MC group
= 8.1, SDC group = .820), as well as higher school achievement in mathematics, foreign
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 20
language, religion, physical education, and handicrafts than did those in group A. However,
none of these differences reached statistical significance. The results are plausible, as subject
domains in middle school are general rather than specific to vocational skills.
Success in vocational studies proved to be related to vocational skill competition
success: A positive correlation (r = .41, p = .012) was found between vocational school GPA
and skills competition success. The most successful competitors did better in their preceding
vocational studies (M = 4.8, SD = .428) than did the least successful competitors (M = 4.4, SD
= .518). Because the skills assessed in vocational competitions represent real working life
skills, one may further argue that education provided by vocational schools supports the
development of vocational talent.
RQ 5. What are the WSC competitors' most essential natural abilities?
We applied Howard Gardner’s theory of Multiple Intelligences (MI, see Gardner, 1983, 1993,
and 1999) to answer the fifth research question. Our first hypothesis postulated that bodily-
kinesthetic intelligence would be the most important natural ability in most skill areas, except
for IT/Programming and Web Design. Secondly, we hypothesized that high logical-
mathematical thinking abilities would benefit competitors in most skill areas.
According to the Bayesian Network produced with BDM, the WorldSkills competitors’
main intelligence areas were (in order of importance): Manual skills (bodily-kinesthetic),
logical-mathematical thinking skills (logical-mathematical), social skills (interpersonal),
spatial skills, and self-knowledge (intrapersonality). The least important intelligence areas
were environmental, musical, spiritual, and linguistic. However, when examining the
differences in intelligences across skill areas, we found that the competitors showed the
greatest differences in linguistic skills and spiritual sensitivity (e.g., the ability to contemplate
in busy everyday life situations). The skill areas that most emphasized these intelligences
were Floristry, Graphic design, Caring, and Beauty therapy.
BCM served to derive the most probable network of predictors of success in
international skills competitions. Classification variables fell into three categories: 1 = group
C (the least successful competitors), 2 = group B, and 3 = group A (the most successful
competitors). Predictor variables in the analysis were the nine Multiple Intelligence
dimensions: Linguistic, mathematical-logical, spatial, bodily-kinesthetic, musical,
interpersonal, intrapersonal, spiritual, and environmental intelligence areas. BCM yielded a
satisfactory classification accuracy of 62.7 per cent (baseline was 44.1%) that the individuals
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 21
in group A were more skilled than members of group C in linguistic, spatial, bodily-
kinesthetic, interpersonal, intrapersonal, spiritual, and environmental intelligence areas.
Group C was more skilled than group A in mathematical-logical and musical intelligence
areas.
RQ 6. What are the WSC competitors' most essential self-regulatory abilities?
Based on theory, our highly selective sample, and previous interviews, we hypothesized that
the motivational level of these young manual skill workers would be exceptionally high. The
most important motivational factor was the meaningfulness of their studies (M = 4.5, SD =
.573), indicating that the young competitors believed that the WSC training would benefit
their future work careers. This result supports the current pedagogical view, which promotes
inquiry and problem-based learning (e.g., Hmelo-Silver, 2004). However, it is worth noting
that the above-mentioned methods, which are based on authentic learning tasks, expect the
students to have strong theoretical basic knowledge about the subject. The application of a
scientific inquiry through trial and error does not necessarily create a clear general view of the
subject and transferable knowledge structures.
As expected, the other motivational factors – with the exception of test anxiety (M = 2.8,
SD = .903) – were also considered important: interest in showing others (extrinsic goal
orientation, M = 4.1, SD = .773) and studying (intrinsic goal orientation, M = 4.0, SD = .606),
belief in one’s own ability (efficacy beliefs, M = 4.1, SD = .666), and effort as a contributor to
success (control beliefs, M = 4.0, SD = .628).
We applied BCM to resolve the most probable network of predictors of success in
international skills competitions (A, B, and C groups). Predictor variables in the analysis were
the six motivational dimensions: Intrinsic goal orientation, Extrinsic goal orientation,
Meaningfulness of studies, Control beliefs, Efficacy beliefs, and Test anxiety. BCM showed
with a classification accuracy of 52.5 per cent (baseline was 44.1%) that only one variable,
meaningfulness of studies, was selected into the most probable network. This finding
indicates that a positive attitude towards vocational training contributes to success in
international skills competitions.
The results showed that there were no differences in motivation or attribution factors
between different skill areas. This finding corresponds with the results of the interview study:
The essential self-regulatory characteristics (motivation, volition, self-reflection) of the
WorldSkills competitors were comparable to those of high achievers in sports (Olympic-level
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 22
athlete study, see Gould, Dieffenbach & Moffett, 2001) and science (academic Olympians
study in mathematics, physics and chemistry, see Heller & Lengfelder, 2000; Nokelainen et
al., 2007; Wu & Chen, 2001).
The most important goal orientation in the sample was mastery goal orientation (M = 4.6,
SD = .442) followed by performance-approach goal orientation (M = 4.2, SD = .666). This
result indicates that respondents understand the importance of competence development, find
learning interesting, and are focused on the task while practicing a skill. Respondents
recorded the lowest levels in performance-avoidance goal orientation (M = 3.5, SD = .683),
thus indicating avoidance of embarrassment and focusing on the self during training instead
of focusing on the task. This finding was expected in our highly selective sample of manual
workers on the basis of the existing body of research in goal orientation theory (for a review,
see Kaplan & Maehr, 2007). Using BDM to compare the goal orientations of the most (group
A) and least (group C) successful competitors, we found that group A was more performance-
approach goal oriented and less performance-avoidance oriented than was group C.
We investigated the volitional aspects of talent development using two dimensions:
perseverance and time management. In the entire sample, perseverance (M = 3.6, SD = .525)
was reportedly slightly more important than time management (M = 3.5, SD = .657). When
the most and least successful WSC competitors were compared using BCM, a higher level of
perseverance and more effective time management skills were linked to the highest
performing competitors. However, the classification accuracy of only 47.5 per cent suggests
that this finding should be interpreted with caution (baseline was 44.1%).
RQ 7. What is the influence of domain- and non-domain-specific factors on the talent
development of WSC competitors?
Our results showed that the home (M = 4.2, SD = .988) and middle school atmospheres (M =
4.6, SD = .673) were considered similarly supportive in terms of the development of
vocational talent; very few negative experiences were reported.
Analysis with a sub-sample (n = 23) comprising of the responses of both competitors and
their parents revealed that, unlike their children (Mhome = 3.2, SDhome = .647 and Mschool = 3.3,
SDschool = .780), the parents considered both atmospheres to be more supportive (M = 3.7, SD
= .714 and M = 3.5, SD = 1.015, respectively). Previous studies on academic mathematics,
physics, and chemistry Olympians found a similar pattern (Nokelainen, Tirri, Campbell &
Walberg, 2007).
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 23
The best predictors were then classified based on success in international skills
competitions (A, B and C groups). Predictor variables in the analysis were: Encouraging
home atmosphere, Stimulating influence of a particular friend, Stimulating influence of a
teacher or trainer, Seeing impressive demonstrations of skill (e.g., furniture, hairstyles),
Interest in a professional field, Desire to learn new things, Interest in finding one’s limits,
Interest in competing with others in vocational skills, Desire to succeed in skills competitions,
Desire to succeed in future working life, Employment in the future, Team spirit amongst the
WSC trainees, and Interest in the company of people sharing similar interests. BCM showed
with a classification accuracy of 67.6 per cent (baseline was 48.7%) that the best predictors
for success in international skills competitions were (in order of importance): Home
atmosphere (a non-domain specific factor), interest in a particular field of work (domain-
specific intrinsic motivation), and interest in competing with others in vocational skills
(domain-specific extrinsic motivation). All were positive predictors for competition success.
Interestingly, the least successful competitors in group C had the highest ratings for the role of
teachers or trainers in the development of their vocational talent.
Characteristics of Vocational Excellence
Based on the survey results, we constructed a model describing the characteristics and
influential external factors on the development of exceptional vocational talent (Figure 5).
The left-hand side of the figure summarizes the characteristics of the members of group C
(representing vocational expertise), and the right-hand side of the model shows comparable
information about the members of group A members (representing vocational excellence). A
weighted line indicates the importance of each characteristic or factor to the development of
vocational talent. The thin dashed line indicates the weakest form of dependency. An
indicator or external factor with no connecting line is, on the basis of research evidence,
considered to have no effect on the development of vocational talent.
-- Insert Figure 5 about here --
Figure 5 shows the significance of the WSC trainee’s personality traits (especially natural
abilities and self-regulation) and external factors (especially support from parents, teachers,
and trainers) in the development of exceptional vocational talent. Competitors who were
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 24
unable to cultivate a strong desire to display their skills (both mastery-approach and
performance-approach goal orientations) and, in addition, had difficulty concentrating on the
task (performance-avoidance goal orientation) were unable to realize their full potential in
competitive situations. Focused mental training in these areas may improve results in the
future. The results indicate that the highest performing competitors have a higher level of
perseverance and more effective time management skills (volition) than do their lower
achieving peers. Further, competitors who rely heavily on domain-specific external support
(teachers, trainers) are most likely to underperform in controlled environments, such as
competitions.
Discussion
An individual’s characteristics – such as intelligence and abilities – stem from the interaction
between heredity and the environment. Although genes can account for individual differences
in the development of competences and expertise, it is impossible to measure their effect on
intelligence. Thinking skills are a fruit of the synergy between heredity and the environment,
including the recognition and definition of problems, creating strategies to solve those
problems, the representation of information, and the allocation of resources, as well as the
observation and evaluation of problem-solving. Sternberg (2005) notes that if we call the
above-mentioned metacomponents of thinking 'intelligence', we must still remember to
acknowledge that intelligence is a form of developing competences which determines the
level of talent development.
The current understanding of giftedness and talent clearly distinguishes the
aforementioned concepts (Gagné, 2004). Giftedness refers to natural characteristics, such as
intellectual, creative, social, and sensori-motorical skills. Talent means systematically
developed skills, such as academic skills, skills related to entrepreneurship, hobbies (music,
sports), command of social situations, and technology. This conceptual separation is hugely
significant to the present study, because while everyone presumably has vocational skills,
only a few will become vocational experts, and even fewer will achieve the level of
vocational excellence.
The starting point for our study was the assumption that top vocational talents would
differ from other skillful persons because of their higher level of domain-specific knowledge
and domain-specific skills (Ericsson, Krampe & Tesch-Römer, 1993). This approach seems
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 25
promising, especially in the eyes of vocational education providers: by investing in the quality
of teaching and learning, it is possible to train a majority of students to become vocational
experts. However, before making further conclusions, we must first address two important
prerequisites. First is the assumption that all students are equal in their natural ability to learn
new things, and second is that all the students have an equal opportunity to participate in goal-
oriented and instructed training (Chi, 2006).
The tenability of the first assumption is questionable, since even if individuals in the
same skill possess equal natural abilities, the development of their potential into
systematically developed skills is a lengthy and complex process. As discussed earlier,
Gagné’s (2004) C.GIPE illustrates how natural abilities (gifts) develop into vocational skills
(talents). In the model, chance and natural abilities, together with goal-oriented, deliberate
practice, play an essential role. Figure 1 shows that chance affects natural abilities
(intelligence, creativity, social skills, sensori-motorical skills), intrapersonal characteristics
(personal traits, self-regulation), and factors related to the environment (available hobby,
leisure, and educational opportunities). Thus, one's natural abilities determine one’s eligibility
to successfully practice a profession. For example, a plumber must have bodily-kinesthetic
abilities such as muscular strength, a programmer must have logical-mathematical thinking
abilities, and a hairdresser must have both bodily-kinesthetic and social skills. Intrapersonal
characteristics regulate both one's interest in a certain vocational skill area and one's
commitment to deliberate practice to become an expert in the field. The amount and quality of
practice carried out on one’s own time (informal) and in instructed (formal) practice
(development process) affect the level of professional field-specific knowledge and skills one
will be exposed to. Environmental factors, such as one's parents’ educational background,
family, friends, and place of residence, affect one's choice of profession.
The other assumption, that all students enjoy equal opportunity to participate in goal-
oriented and instructed training, can be fulfilled more easily than the first one. The key to
success is to encourage vocational training institutions to participate in national-level skill
competitions. This will inevitably lead teachers in participating organizations to seek higher
competence in their field (professional development) through different roles (trainers, experts)
in the process. Their knowledge of new innovations in vocational training and skill-specific
working methods would not only benefit WSC competitors and their non-participating
students in vocational institutions, but would also challenge their colleagues to update their
professional knowledge and, thus, create a more forceful transfer of knowledge. Vocational
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 26
education students and their teachers in various institutions around the world will also benefit
from new ideas and support for their professional self-esteem by visiting both national and
international competitions.
Further, we would like to emphasize the fact that all the characteristics of vocational
expertise and excellence discussed in this paper, except for natural abilities, are controllable,
at least to some extent, and, thus, are manageable through educational policies. Since the
development of vocational talent is a life-long learning process, any of the competitors in
group C may achieve the level of vocational excellence later in their work careers. The
recognition of hindering factors to talent development in the early stages of formal education
will help the future work force to fulfill its development potential. Examples of such factors
appear in this paper: 1) attributing success mainly to uncontrollable instead of controllable
factors, 2) using maladaptive instead of adaptive patterns of learning, and 3) focusing on the
self instead of focusing on the task. WSC training programs offer one viable environment to
put these research findings to use.
Limitations of the study
It is worth asking whether the WSC competitors are true representatives of top talents in their
skill areas in Finland. We believe they are for two reasons. Firstly, all the governmental
operations related to both national (Taitaja) and international (WSC) skills competitions are
professionally organized through a specialized organization, WorldSkills Finland. The
organization provides training in collaboration with universities of applied sciences for
teachers who train the competitors. Thus, most of the Finnish vocational educational
institutions acknowledge the importance of the WSC program and encourage their students to
participate in the regional competitions. This ensures that most top level talents have true
access to the WSC training program. Secondly, the selection process of the Finnish WSC
team is rigorous. Only the winners of each skill category in regional competitions are
permitted to participate in the national skill competition. Then, only the gold and silver
medalists of the national skill competition for each skill category are eligible to apply for
Team Finland membership. Initial selection of the team is based on interviews with the team
leaders as well as both manual skill and mental trainers. Members of the team are monitored
during the one-year training period, and the final composition of the team is announced about
three months prior to the international competition on the basis of their performance in the
training program.
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 27
The second limitation of this study relates to the generalizability of the small (n = 64)
survey sample, which will inevitably lead to low power (Cohen, 1988). Although we applied
Bayesian statistical techniques designed to deal with small samples, non-normal distributions,
non-linear dependencies, and missing data, it is computationally impossible to add power to
the design. Fortunately, because this study used a mixed-method design, the interviews (n =
30) provided complementary research evidence .
Future research
Future research directions regarding the characteristics of young manual skill workers should
include examination of their mindsets (Dweck, 1999; Yeager et al., 2010). Our current
understanding is that those individuals with an incremental mindset are more likely to cope
successfully with traumatic experiences (or experiences of success and failure) during
vocational education, WSC training and competitions, as well as working life than are those
with an entity mindset. Future research should also aim to address issues involving the health
(lifestyle), hobbies, safety, and media skills of WorldSkills competitors, and also focus more
on the WSC skill areas that require teamwork, such as Caring and Mecatronics.
Research has shown that it takes about 6 to 30 years to achieve the highest level of
knowledge and skills in the fields of science, art, and sports (Ericsson, 2006; Ericsson,
Krampe & Tesch-Römer, 1993). Since the maximum age limit for competitors of the
WorldSkills Competition is 23 years, those individuals who participated in our study will
have, after their basic training, spent five to seven years developing their professional skills.
These young competitors will reach, at most, a pre-stage of vocational expertise or excellence
during the competition training process. The model presented in Figure 5 fails to describe the
characteristics or development of vocational excellence after formal education and coaching,
even though it is evident that talent development is a life-long learning process (e.g., Lawler,
1994; Pazy, 2004). An important question for future studies is how young manual skill
workers will develop their talents further and succeed in working life.
All of the above-mentioned questions call for longitudinal research designs with control
groups (students in vocational institutions who have not participated in WSC training), which
will allow us to examine the long-term impact of natural abilities, intrinsic characteristics, and
extrinsic conditions (e.g., whether they have or have not participated in skills training and
competitions) on the career development of young workers. The issues discussed in this paper
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 28
should be placed into international context by constructing research designs that will allow
cross-cultural comparisons.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Professor Pekka Ruohotie and the Helsinki 2005, Shizuoka
2007, and Calgary 2009 team members as well as SkillsFinland (http://www.skillsfinland.fi)
for their cooperation in this study. This study was funded by the Finnish Ministry of
Education and Culture (http://www.minedu.fi).
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 29
References
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice
Hall.
Barrow, R., & Milburn, G. (1990). A Critical Dictionary of Educational Concepts. Second
edition. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.) (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York, NY: Ballantine
Books.
Campbell, J. R. (1996). Developing cross-national instruments: Using cross-national methods
and procedures. International Journal of Educational Research, 25(6), 485-496.
Chi, M. T. (2006). Two Approaches to the Study of Experts’ Characteristics. In K. A.
Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge
Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (pp. 21-30). Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Second edition.
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Connell, M., Sheridan, K., & Gardner, H. (2004). Experts, generalists, and expert generalists:
On the relation between general competence and expertise in a domain. In R. Sternberg,
& E. Grigorenko (Eds.), Perspectives on the psychology of abilities, competencies, and
expertise (pp. 126-155). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Corno, L. (1989). Self-regulated learning: A volitional analysis. In B. Zimmerman, & D.
Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theory, Research
and Practice (pp. 111-142). New York, NY: Springer.
Corno, L. (1993). The Best-laid plans. Modern conceptions of volition and educational
research. Educational Researcher, 22(2), 14-22.
Dai, D. Y., Moon, S. M., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1998). Achievement Motivation and Gifted
Students: A Social Cognitive Perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 45-63.
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 30
Day, E. A., Arthur, W., & Gettman, D. (2001). Knowledge structures and the acquisition of a
complex skill. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 1022-1033.
Driscoll, M. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction. Third edition. Toronto, ON: Allyn
& Bacon.
Dweck, C. (1999). Self theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development.
Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and
intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 70(3), 461-475.
Ellström, P.-E. (1994). Kompetens, lärande och utbildning i arbetslivet. Problem, begrepp
och teoretiska perspektiv. [Skills, learning, and education in working life. Problems,
concepts, and theoretical perspectives]. Stockholm: Publica.
Ellström, P.-E. (2001). The many meanings of occupational competence and qualification. In
W. J. Nijhof & J. N. Streumer (Eds.), Key Qualifications in Work and Education (pp.
39-50). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the
acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363-406.
Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The Influence of Experience and Deliberate Practice on the
Development of Superior Expert Performance. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J.
Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert
Performance (pp. 683-703). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: the DMGT as a developmental theory. High
Ability Studies, 15(2), 119-147.
Gagné, F. (2010). Motivation within the DMGT 2.0 framework. High Ability Studies, 21(2),
81-99.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple Intelligences: The Theory in Practice. New York, NY: Basic
Books.
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New
York, NY: Basic Books.
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 31
Gill, J. (2002). Bayesian methods. A Social and Behavioral Sciences Approach. Boca Raton:
Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Gould, D., Dieffenbach, K., & Moffett, A. (2001). Psychological talent in Olympic medal
winning athletes. US Olympic Committee Sport Science and Technology Final Grant
Report. Colorado Springs, CO.
Greenspan, D. A., Solomon, B., & Gardner, H. (2004). The development of talent in different
domains. In L. V. Shavinina & M. Ferrari (Eds.), Beyond knowledge (pp. 119-135).
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relationships. New York, NY: Wiley.
Heller, K., & Lengfelder, A. (2000, April). German Olympiad study on mathematics, physics
and chemistry. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational
Research Association, New Orleans, USA.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn?
Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266.
Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (2007). The Contributions and Prospects of Goal Orientation
Theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19(2), 141-184.
Kitsantas, A., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Comparing self-regulatory processes among
novice, non-expert, and expert volleyball players: A microanalytic study. Journal of
Applied Sport Psychology, 14(2), 91-105.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Second
edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Lawler, E. E. (1994). From job-based to competence-based organizations. Journal of
Organizational Behaviour, 15(1), 3-15.
Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L. H., Freeman, K. E.,
Gheen, M., Kaplan, A., Kumar, R., Middleton, M. J., Nelson, J., Roeser, R., & Urdan,
T. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS). Ann Arbor,
MI: University of Michigan.
Myllymäki, P., Silander, T., Tirri, H., & Uronen, P. (2002). B-Course: A Web-Based Tool for
Bayesian and Causal Data Analysis. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence
Tools, 11(3), 369-387.
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 32
Nicholls, J. G., Cheung, P. C., Lauer, J., & Patashnick, M. (1989). Individual differences in
academic motivation: Perceived ability, goals, beliefs, and values. Learning and
Individual Differences, 1(1), 63-84.
Nokelainen, P. (2008). Modeling of Professional Growth and Learning: Bayesian approach.
Acta Universitas Tamperensis 1317. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
Nokelainen, P., Silander, T., Ruohotie, P., & Tirri, H. (2007). Investigating the Number of
Non-linear and Multi-modal Relationships Between Observed Variables Measuring
Growth-oriented Atmosphere. Quality & Quantity, 41(6), 869-890.
Nokelainen, P., & Ruohotie, P. (2002). Modeling Student’s Motivational Profile for Learning
in Vocational Higher Education. In H. Niemi & P. Ruohotie (Eds.), Theoretical
Understandings for Learning in the Virtual University (pp. 177-206). Hämeenlinna:
RCVE.
Nokelainen, P., Tirri, K., & Campbell, J. R. (2004). Cross-cultural Predictors of Mathematical
Talent and Academic Productivity. High Ability Studies, 15(2), 230-242.
Nokelainen, P., Tirri, K., Campbell, J. R., & Walberg, H. (2007). Factors that Contribute or
Hinder Academic Productivity: Comparing two groups of most and least successful
Olympians. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(6), 483-500.
Nokelainen, P., Tirri, K., & Merenti-Välimäki, H.-L. (2007). The Influence of Self-
attributions and Parental Attitude to the Development of Mathematical Talent. Gifted
Child Quarterly, 51(1), 64-81.
Pazy, A. (2004). Updating in Response to the Experience of Lacking Knowledge. Applied
Psychology: An international review, 53(3), 436-452.
Pillay, H. (1998). Adult learning in a workplace context. In P. Sutherland (Ed.), Adult
Learning: a Reader (pp. 122-136). London: Kogan Page.
Pintrich, P. R. (1994). Continuities and discontinuities: Future directions for research in
educational psychology. Educational Psychologist, 29(3), 137-148.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A Manual for the Use of
the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Technical Report 91-B-004. Ann
Arbor: University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary
Teaching and Learning.
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 33
Ruohotie, P. (2004). Self-regulatory Abilities in Professional Learning. In J. R. Campbell, K.
Tirri, P. Ruohotie, & H. Walberg (Eds.), Cross-cultural Research: Basic Issues,
Dilemmas, and Strategies (pp. 159-184). Hämeenlinna: RCVE.
Ruohotie, P., & Nokelainen, P. (2000). Beyond the Growth-oriented Atmosphere. In B.
Beairsto & P. Ruohotie (Eds.), Empowering Teachers as Lifelong Learners (pp. 147-
167). Hämeenlinna: RCVE.
Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (2000). Self-regulation and academic learning. In M.
Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 631-
650). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Snow, R. E., Corno, L., & Jackson, D. N. (1996). Individual differences in affective and
conative functions. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational
Psychology (pp. 243-310). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster MacMillan.
Snow, R. E., & Farr, M. J. (Eds.) (1987). Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction: Vol. 3.
Conative and Affective Process Analyses. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Snow, R. E., & Jackson, D. N. (1994). Individual Differences in Conation: Selected
Constructs and Measures. In H. F. O´Neil & M. Drillings (Eds.), Motivation: Theory
and Research (pp. 71-99). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sternberg, R. J. (1991). Death, taxes, and bad intelligence tests. Intelligence, 15(3), 257-269.
Sternberg, R. J. (2005). Intelligence, competence, and expertise. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck
(Eds.), Handbook of Competence and Motivation (pp. 15-30). New York, NY: The
Guilford Press.
Tirri, K., & Nokelainen, P. (2008). Identification of multiple intelligences with the Multiple
Intelligence Profiling Questionnaire III. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50(2), 206-221.
Weiner, B. (1974). Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, NJ: General
Learning Press.
Weiner, B. (1980). The role of affect in rational (attributional) approaches to human
motivation. Educational Researcher, 9(7), 4-11.
Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York, NY:
Springer.
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 34
Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories and research. Newbury Park,
CA: Sage.
Weiner, B. (1994). Integrating social and personal theories of achievement striving. Review of
Educational Research, 64(4), 557-573.
Weiner, B. (2000). Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Theories of Motivation from an
Attributional Perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 12(1), 1-14.
Williams, R. S. (2002). Managing Employee Performance. London: Thomson Learning.
Wu, W., & Chen, J. (2001). A follow-up study of Taiwan physics and chemistry Olympians:
The role of environmental influences in talent development. Gifted and Talented
International, 16(1), 16-26.
Yeager, D. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., Tirri, K., Nokelainen, P., & Dweck, C. S. (2010).
Adolescents' Implicit Theories Predict Desire for Vengeance After Remembered and
Hypothetical Peer Conflicts: Correlational and Experimental Evidence. Developmental
Psychology, 47(4), 1090-1107.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). The hidden dimension of personal competence:
Self-regulated learning and practice. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of
Competence and Motivation (pp. 509-526). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 397-410.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An
analysis of exemplary instructional models. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman
(Eds.), Self-Regulated Learning: From Teaching to Self-Reflective Practice (pp. 1-19).
New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation. A social cognitive perspective. In M.
Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-
39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2006). Development and Adaptation of Expertise: The Role of Self-
Regulatory Processes and Beliefs. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R.
R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance
(pp. 705-722). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 35
Figure 1. Causal order of components in the Development of Vocational Excellence (adapted
from Gagné, 2004, p. 121).
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 36
Figure 2. Characteristics specific to WorldSkills competitors (interview data, n= 30).
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 37
Figure 3. Characteristics specific to WorldSkills competitors' during the training period, competitions, and working life (interview data, n= 30).
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 38
Figure 4. Characteristics specific to WorldSkills competitors' initial interest in the field, perseverance in acquiring a vocational skill, and mastery
of that skill (interview data, n= 30).
Nokelainen: Characteristics of Vocational Expertise and Excellence 39
Figure 5. Characteristics of cocational expertise and excellence (survey data, n= 64). MAP = Mastery-approach goal orientation, PAP =
Performance-approach goal orientation, PAV = Performance-avoidance goal orientation.