Transcript
Page 1: Modelling institutional approaches to web-based lecture technologies

COVERAGE“Define your end-point: partial/focused or ubiquitous installation and use”

DisciplineAreas:LocalControl: TechnicalApplications: Fixed

InstitutionManagerialFlexible

- Localenthusiasmorgreatestneed?- Adhocorpatchycoverage- Opt-inversusopt-out

STAFF DEVELOPMENT“Leverage the benefits of WBLT through staff development”

TechnologyorientatedTrainingorientatedComplianceorientated

Curriculumpedagogy

Informedconsent

- Engagementandbuy-in- Whoprovidesstaffdevelopment?- Evidenceofimpact

GOVERNANCE“Responsibility will need to be handed over from the initiators to a formal university group”

IPR: ImplicitConsent: Informal

Policy: Enthusiast

ExplicitFormalSteeringGroup

- Briefingmanagersonimplications- definingstakeholdersandkeyinterests- Pragmaticplanningandpolicydevelopment

MODEL“You will need to develop a holistic framework to meet your academic needs”

Business: Internal

Resource: Utility

ExternalChangeValueAdded

- Roleoflectureinteaching- Perceivedvalueoflecturers- Distancelearningvs.supplement

IMPLEMENTATION“Be realistic about the pace at which lecture capture can be rolled out at your institution”

Stimulus: OrganicPush: BottomTimescale: Slow

PlannedTopRapid

- Crossserviceplanning- Academicallyled?- Incentivising

INTEGRATION“Early standalone initiatives need to be integrated into a wide range of systems and policies”

IntegratedIntegratedIntegrated

- Sustainabilityofearlygainsatinstitutionallevel- Managementofintegrationwithcorporatesystems

Modelling institutional approaches to web-based lecture technologiesJohnCouperthwaite1,JulietHinrichsen2,CharlesShields3

1EducationalTechnologyManager,CollegeofMedicalandDentalSciences,UniversityofBirmingham2EducationalDesigner,eLearningUnit,CoventryUniversity

3HeadofeLearning,LoughboroughUniversity

THEMES Sub-themes

Pedagogy: Nochange

Universitysystems:standalone

Roomfacilities:standalone

Alternatives/Options Issues

ThebusinesscaseforusingWBLTswilldeterminekeydecisions. Forexample,enhancingstudentlearningwillleadtowidecoverage,lowproductionvaluesand‘throwaway’policywhilstdistancelearningcapabilitymaybetargeted,haveahigh-valueproductionstrategycoupledwithare-usepolicy.Considerwhodeliversstaffdevelopment.

Actions:- ScopeallpotentialusesofWBLTEnsureyoursupportmodelandfinancialinvestmentissustainable- Choosetherightmixoftechnologies

TheplanforadoptingWBLT’swithintheinstitutionshouldbeformulatedaroundprinciplesof usebyarepresentativegroupofstakeholders.Policydecisionswillneedtobemadetocoverlegalimplications(suchasIPR,branding),ethicalissues(opt-in,consent),andsustainablegrowth(finance,storage,devices,administration).

Actions:- Recognisecompleximplications- Needforcontractualclarity/issues- Organisationofformalstakeholdergroups

ThemodelforimplementationwilllimittherateatwhichWBLTwillbeintegratedintotheinstitution.Grassrootsoriginswillrequiresignificantevidenceofimpactandacriticalmassofuserstoencouragegrowth,whilstlargescaleintroductionsmustnecessarilybemanagedbyseniorstaff,bestrategicallyplannedandareoftenrapidlyphased.

Actions:- Establishacriticalmassofcommittedacademics- Coordinateplanningbetweendepartmentsandsupportunits- Ensurefullstakeholderrepresentation- Gatherevidenceofimpactandvalue

Theroll-outofdevicesacrossaninstitutionisunlikelytobeevenlydistributedintheearlystagesaslocaldemand,spaceandtechnicalcapacitydictateusage. Themovetowardsglobalcoverageandadiversityofmodesofapplicationwillbefoundeduponpeerreview,escalatingdemandandagrowingconfidence.Controlovertheadministrationoftheservicewillalsorequireresolutionastheservicegrows;thisincludes:maintenance,scheduling,timetabling,editing,andstorage.

Actions:- Targetinstallationstoacademicdemand- Usestudentdemand- Expectgrowthfromwordofmouth- EnsurecoherentITandEstatesinfrastructure- Linktotimetablingandroomallocationpolicies

Directtrainingforthesetechnologiesisminimalbutmayincludepresentationanddeliverytips,andpracticalaspects,suchastimetablingandeditingcaptures. Themainstaffdevelopmentopportunitieslieinhelpingstafftounderstandandapplythepolicies,andinleveragingWBLTstoimprovepedagogicalpracticeandstudentlearning. Appropriateandtimelystaffdevelopmentcansupportengagementbyacademicstaffthrough‘myth-busting’andresponsetolegitimateconcerns.

Actions:- Highlightthevarietyofpossiblepedagogicalapproaches- Stresstheimportanceofrightsandresponsibilities- Includeopportunitiesforreflectionandplanning- Createorreuseexistingexemplarsandtoolkits

EmbeddingWBLTsystemswithinorganisationsdemandslinkageatavarietyoflevels:thepedagogicallinkwithinstitutionallearningandteachingstrategies;thesystemslinkwithtechnicalinfrastructure;themodificationoflearningenvironmentstoaccommodatenewrecordingfacilities;andcomplexculturalissuesbetweenstaffandstudentperceptionsofuse.

Actions:- IntegratewithLearning,TeachingandAssessmentStrategies- Stressthebenefitsforretention,accessibilityandstudentsupport- Identifyrelatedtechnologies- Encourageinter-departmentalworking

“..a convergence of ideas and approaches...”The introduction of WBLT varies widely between institutions owing to differing starting points, drivers and experience, whilst variations within institutions are also recognised. However, as the implementation matures we have observed a convergence of ideas and approaches, common to other learning systems, such as ePortfolios. An analysis of the approaches taken by eight UK and US institutions at various stages in their implementation highlights a high level of commonality in issues faced, good practice arising and the degree of integration with existing systems.

This schematic model aims to describe how key change management themes are represented for WBLT. Whilst not comprehensive, it identifies particular sub-themes which demonstrate the range of approaches commonly taken, from inception to system maturity.

“...a cross institutional perspective...”From taking a cross-institutional perspective it is readily apparent that often diverse starting positions and intentions lead to a ‘distinctive convergence’around common core principles, such as governance and implementation.

Experiences from the eight institutions indicate that a successful implementation is much more complex than first perceived, with a clear business model, governance planning and stakeholder involvement being equally critical. Furthermore, staff development and training in WBLT must be academically led, with clear exemplars and supporting evidence of impact and value. Finally, the model presented is believed to represent a much broader applicability for the planning and implementation of similar large-scale technological systems in an academic setting.

“...an audit tool for embedding lecture capture technologies”This approach offers a set of simple guidelines and action points to staff responsible for implementing lecture capture systems. Evidence from the institutions involved in this analysis, and in the ELTAC study, highlights a clear need for cross-working, and a sharing of ideas and solutions to maximise the clear potential available.

By adopting this model as an audit tool for embedding lecture capture, planning teams can assess their readiness for expansion/change based the set of alternative positions presented in the themed areas. In many cases, we see that evolution towards full institutional maturity will involve progressing from the left to the right in each of the ranges expressed above.

PedagogicalApproaches:standalone

Curriculumpedagogy

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSTheauthorswouldliketothankJISCforfundingtheELTACprojectattheUniversityofCoventry(link)andeachoftheinstitutionsinvolved.TheywouldalsoliketothanktheUniversitas21networkforfundingJohnCouperthwaite’sresearchintolecturecapture.Furtherresourcesareavailablefrom:http://del.ico.us/couperjo/wblt

BirminghamUniversity:haveestablishedatime-limitedpilotwith10fixedunitstotestefficacy,cost,staffandstudentsatisfaction

MODE

LIM

PLEM

ETATION

STAF

FDE

VELO

PMEN

T

GOVE

RNAN

CECO

VERA

GEINTEGR

ATION

Top Related