Download - Modernization Lessons Learned -Part 2
Modernizations & Migrations Lessons Learned
Part II
Laurie R. Ben
John Dolenc
Introduction
Part I
– Modernization/Migration Projects Overview
– Choosing the Approach/Strategy
– Justification : Where‟s the money coming from? ROI
– Cost Impacts: Where‟s the money going? TICC
– Summary: Part I
Part II
– Risk Mitigation & Best Practices
– Lessons Learned: What to watch for?
– Summary Part II
Modernization/Migration Planning
Legacy DCS
• Approach/Strategy
• Scope of Work
• Justification
• Cost
• Risk Mitigation
• Schedule
Migration Project Risks
Not restarting production on schedule after the cutover
Will new control strategy work
Poor control loop performance
Communication issues
– Interfaces / Migration Products
– Between system and existing 3rd party devices
Missing a key interface or action
Schedule creep
Cost escalation
Risk Mitigation
Early Engineering and Planning
– Detailed site survey
– Operational functional specification
– Scope of Work
• Definition
• Freeze
• Maximize pre-cutover work
Legacy System Data Mining
Test plan preparation and thorough configuration
testing prior to installation
Experienced project team leadership
Multi-project program management
Cost Influence
High
Low
Ability to
Influence Cost
Time
100%
50%
0%
Ability to
Influence Cost
Cost
Expenditure
Define Scope
Process Development
Design
Implementation
Start-up
Phase 1
APPRAISE
Phase 2
SELECT
Phase 3
DEFINE
Phase 4
EXECUTE
Phase 5
OPERATE
FEED PHASECONSULTING
Phase 1
VISION
Phase 2
DEFINE
Phase 3
DESIGN
Phase 4
IMPLEMENT
Phase 5
OPTIMIZE
FEED PHASE(Concept/Study)
Consulting- Idea Generation
- Option Review
- Justification
- Identify Risk
Project Activities- Scope Development
- Engineering & Design
- Project Management
- Risk Mitigation
Optimization Activities- Data Gathering
- Performance Assessment
- Control Strategy Optimization
Independent Project Analysis (IPA) Model: Modernization/Migration Projects
7.5% increased project ROI
30% decrease in project duration
6% additional capacity
Initial Site Audits
System life cycle audit
Physical infrastructure
Operational objectives
Example Detailed System Life Cycle Audit
PART NUMBER DESCRIPTION
Total
System
BOM
Site
Stores
Spares
Satelite
SparesDecom.
Hot
Spares
Total
Spares
Rec.
Spares
Spares
GapComments
Site
Failure
Rate
CURRENT
STATUS
CURRENT
DATE
MOVE TO
ACTIVE
MOVE TO
SUPPORTED
MOVE TO
RETIREDCOMMENTS ON NEWER PARTS
Control Files
01984-3048-0001 CONTROLFILE CARD CAGE ONLY ASSEMBLY 10 0 1 2 0 3 2 0 RETIRED Apr-92 Aug-96 Aug-96 Aug-06 Replaced by 10P56500001
01984-0023-0001 CONTROLFILE (CARD CAGE ONLY) 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RETIRED Dec-83 Apr-92 Apr-92 Jul-02 Replaced by 10P56500001
10P56500001 CONTROLFILE CARD CAGE ONLY ASSEMBLY, EMC COMPLIANT 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ACTIVE Aug-96 Oct-03 Dec-10 Oct-13 Replaced by 10P56500001
01984-4164-0004 COORDINATOR PROCESSOR IV+ CARD ASSEMBLY (CPIV) 21 0 1 4 0 5 0 1 RETIRED Jun-91 Jun-95 Jun-95 Jun-05 Replaced by 10P50870004
01984-4064-0004 COORDINATOR PROCESSOR IV CARD ASSEMBLY (CPIV) 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 RETIRED Mar-90 Jun-91 Jun-91 Jul-02 If unavailable use 01984-4164-0004
10P50870004 COORDINATOR PROCESSOR IV+ CARD ASSEMBLY (CPIV+), EMC COMPLIANT 4 2 0 0 0 2 4 2 1 ACTIVE Jun-95 Jun-00 Dec-10 Dec-10
01984-4068-0006 MULTIPURPOSE CONTROLLER II (MPC II) CARD ASSEMBLY 98 0 1 14 0 15 8 7 RETIRED Jun-91 Apr-95 Apr-95 Apr-05 Replaced by 10P50400006
10P50400006 MULTIPURPOSE CONTROLLER II CARD ASSEMBLY (MPC II), EMC COMPLIANT 16 3 0 0 0 3 0 1 RETIRED Apr-95 Jun-00 Jun-10 Jun-10
01984-2347-0021 CONTROLFILE NONVOLATILE MEMORY CARD ASSEMBLY (2 MEG) 17 4 1 2 0 7 4 14 ACTIVE Apr-90 Jun-00 Dec-10 Dec-10 Can't use 4MB NVM on a v18 system
01984-1505-0001 CONTROLFILE POWER REGULATOR CARD ASSEMBLY (40 AMP) 3 0 3 0 0 3 0 1 RETIRED Nov-87 Nov-90 Nov-90 Jul-02 Replaced by 01984-3505-0001
01984-3505-0001 CONTROLFILE POWER REGULATOR CARD ASSEMBLY (5 VOLT ONLY) 31 2 0 4 0 6 4 2 ACTIVE Jan-90 Oct-03 Dec-10 Oct-13
01984-1502-0001 CONTROLFILE PEERWAY BUFFER CARD ASSEMBLY 34 0 1 4 0 5 4 6 ACTIVE Aug-84 Oct-03 Dec-10 Oct-13
Consoles
01984-1045-0003 PEERWAY INTERFACE CARD ASSEMBLY 14 1 3 0 0 4 2 1 ACTIVE Nov-84 Oct-03 Oct-11 Oct-13
01984-1540-0009 68020 OPERATOR INTERFACE (OI) PROCESSOR CARD ASSEMBLY 14 0 3 0 0 3 2 BootROMs are v9.26 1 RETIRED Jan-90 May-92 Dec-06 Jan-10
01984-2372-xxxx ELEVATED MAIN KEYBOARD 14 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 Could supply all the spare parts; See Consumable section below4 ACTIVE Nov-95 Jul-01 Oct-10 Jul-11 Actual P/N 01984-2372-1001
01984-1989-0001 MAGNETIC TAPE DRIVE/SCSI ASSEMBLY, 45MB, ARCHIVE P/N 20669-003, MODEL 5945S-1 14 3 1 0 0 4 4 Quote Already Provided 6 RETIRED Aug-86 Sep-92 Sep-92 Sep-02
01984-2780-0001 WINCHESTER HARD DISK DRIVE, 80MB, MODEL 80S 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 RETIRED Oct-88 Nov-91 Nov-91 Jul-02
01984-3100-0002 WINCHESTER HARD DISK DRIVE, 105MB, MODEL LPS105S 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 RETIRED Nov-91 Nov-96 Nov-96 Jul-02
10P5280000x WINCHESTER HARD DISK DRIVE, 270MB, MODEL LPS270S/MV27S011 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Quote already Provided for these HDs 4 RETIRED Oct-97 Jul-98 Jul-98 Jul-03
10P58570001 QUANTUM HARD DISK DRIVE, 2.1GB, MODEL QM32, INITIALIZED, WITH BRACKETS 1 0 0 0 0 0 14 14 If upgrading to P1, the supply the 4.5 GB HDD; P/N 12P230400011 RETIRED Jul-98 Mar-00 Mar-00 Mar-05
01984-1137-0001 POWER REGULATOR CARD ASSEMBLY 14 1 3 0 0 4 2 Send in for refurbishment- See KBA 1 ACTIVE Nov-84 Oct-03 Oct-11 Oct-13
01984-2503-0001 COLOR VIDEO GENERATOR CARD ASSEMBLY (PIXEL) 14 2 1 0 0 3 2 BootROM v9.27 is required for newer 10P58900001 card4 RETIRED May-87 Mar-00 Aug-00 Mar-10 Replaced by 10P58900001
01984-1011-0003 PRINTER INTERFACE CARD ASSEMBLY 14 2 1 0 0 3 2 Battery present on this card 6 SUPPORTED Jan-85 Dec-00 Jun-10 Dec-10
01984-1140-0001 SCSI INTERFACE CARD ASSEMBLY 13 1 3 0 0 4 2 1 RETIRED Mar-85 Jun-96 Jun-96 Jun-06 If unavailable use 01984-1140-0004
01984-1140-0004 SCSI INTERFACE CARD ASSEMBLY 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ACTIVE Jun-96 Dec-00 Mar-11 Mar-11
10P50840004 KEYBOARD VIDEO INTERFACE CARD AND BEZEL ASSEMBLY 14 2 2 0 0 4 2 1 ACTIVE Dec-99 Dec-00 Dec-10 Dec-10 I'm sure the customer doesn't have these new versions!
01984-2386-2005 ENHANCED CONFIGURATION KEYBOARD, ENGLISH (MTCC), MODEL G81-1854 12 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 1 ACTIVE Apr-03 Dec-00 Dec-10 Dec-10 Replaces 01984-2386-1005
FlexTerm I/O
01984-1460-0003 FIC: 6 I/O POINTS PER CARD ASSEMBLY 96 4 2 0 0 6 8 2 3 ACTIVE Mar-85 Nov-91 Dec-10 Dec-10
01984-2483-0005 FIC: SMART DAUGHTER CARD ASSEMBLY 26 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 1 RETIRED Nov-87 Nov-95 Nov-95 Nov-05 Replaced by 10P54500005
01984-2491-0001 COMM CONNECT CARD ASSEMBLY 22 0 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 RETIRED Aug-87 Mar-92 Mar-92 Mar-02 Replaced by part number 10P54560001
01984-2494-0001 ANALOG I/O TRANSFER CARD ASSEMBLY 135 4 1 12 0 17 5 0 ACTIVE Nov-87 Oct-03 Mar-11 Oct-13
01984-2518-0002 FIC: 4-20 mA - 2 IN / 1 OUT CARD ASSEMBLY 537 0 0 87 0 87 20 12 RETIRED Jan-88 Nov-95 Nov-95 Nov-05 Replaced by 10P54440002, then 10P59150002
10P54440002 FIC: 4-20 mA - 2 IN / 1 OUT CARD ASSEMBLY 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RETIRED Nov-95 Nov-95 Mar-00 Nov-05 Replaced by 10P59150002
10P59150002 FIC: 4-20 mA - 2 IN / 1 OUT CARD ASSEMBLY 6 2 0 1 0 3 0 0 SUPPORTED Mar-00 Nov-95 Jan-07 Dec-10
01984-2526-0002 ANALOG CARD CAGE 69 0 1 6 0 7 2 0 ACTIVE Mar-87 Oct-03 Dec-10 Oct-13
01984-2543-0001 COMM CONNECT CARD III ASSEMBLY 47 0 0 6 0 6 2 0 RETIRED Mar-92 May-96 May-96 May-06 Replaced by part number 10P54560001
01984-2546-0002 FIC: PULSE INPUT / OUTPUT CARD ASSEMBLY (NPC202) 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 RETIRED Apr-89 Apr-96 Apr-96 Apr-06 Replaced by 10P54470002, then by 12P25960002
01984-2576-0001 CONTACT FLEXTERM (CARD CAGE ONLY) 12 0 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 ACTIVE Jul-92 Apr-91 Dec-10 Dec-10
Multipoint FIM I/O
01984-4080-0001 FIM: DISCRETE I/O ASSEMBLY (FIM001) 21 1 0 5 0 6 0 Send in for refurbishment- See KBA 2 RETIRED Oct-91 Sep-95 Sep-95 Sep-05 Replaced by 10P53520006
01984-4121-0001 ISOLATED DISCRETE TERMINATION PANEL A 25 1 0 5 0 6 1 1 RETIRED Nov-91 Jun-95 Jun-95 Jun-05 Replaced by 01984-4121-0002
01984-4121-0002 ISOLATED DISCRETE TERMINATION PANEL A, EMC & LVD 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ACTIVE Nov-91 Oct-03 Oct-10 Oct-13
01984-4124-0001 ISOLATED DISCRETE TERMINATION PANEL B 25 1 0 5 0 6 1 0 RETIRED Nov-91 Jun-95 Jun-95 Jun-05 Replaced by 01984-4124-0002
01984-4124-0002 ISOLATED DISCRETE TERMINATION PANEL B, EMC & LVD 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ACTIVE Nov-91 Oct-03 Oct-10 Oct-13
10P53520006 FIM: DIO ASSEMBLY, LOW SIDE SWITCH, 32 POINT 16 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 1 ACTIVE Sep-95 Oct-03 Oct-10 Oct-13
10P54040004 FIM: ANALOG INPUT FIM ASSEMBLY, 16 POINT 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 RETIRED Nov-95 Dec-97 Dec-97 Dec-07 Replaced by 10P57700005
10P54080004 FIM: ANALOG OUTPUT FIM ASSEMBLY, 16 POINT 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 RETIRED Oct-95 May-99 May-99 May-09 Replaced by 10P58080005
10P54770001 MULTI-POINT AIO TERMINATION PANEL ASSEMBLY, 16 POINT, SCREW TERMINALS ONLY 16 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 ACTIVE Nov-95 Oct-03 Oct-10 Oct-13
10P57700005 FIM: ANALOG INPUT FIM ASSEMBLY, 16 POINT 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 1 ACTIVE Dec-97 Oct-03 Oct-10 Oct-13
10P58080005 FIM: ANALOG OUTPUT FIM ASSEMBLY, 16 POINT 2 1 0 0 0 1 4 3 0 SUPPORTED May-99 Oct-03 Dec-03 Oct-13
RS3 System Inventory Site Spares Obsolescence Status
Life Cycle Audit
RS3 „GOTCHA‟
Detailed review consists of analyzing all the I/O types, firmware, and software revision levels to ensure all the I/O is compatible with the transition solution
In most cases, firmware can be upgraded using the RS3 System before the installation of transition solution
Not doing this step could result in I/O not being compatible and/or I/O not at the correct revision level
Startup is a little too late to find this out…
Modernization/Migration Project Planning
Understand that the original process automation plan may
have been designed to meet minimum requirements with
no regards for future yield and energy optimization
Original Project Criteria & Actions
Energy was cheap
Measurement technology was lacking
I&C scope reduced for project budget reasons
Modernization/Migration Project Planning
Understand the difference between process / operational
requirements and legacy system methods to perform a task
Process operational functional specification development
based on operational KPI performance
Define a detailed automation system design basis that best
uses the features of the control system to meet the
functional specification
Modernization/Migration Project Planning
To get improved efficiencies, yield & energy consumption –
NEED TO PUSH THE ENVELOP
Run as close to constraints as possible
– Complex control strategies
– Constraint control
– MPC with Optimizer
Need process measurements
Need to remove variability in control loops
– Control valve performance
– Good tuning of control loops
Early notification of possible abnormal operations
Modernization/Migration Project Planning
Use control engineers to oversee or review the design of
the control strategy
Thoroughly test system configuration prior to
commissioning
Properly plan and staff the commissioning and start-up
including the use of the system tools such as AMS and
INSIGHT
Optimize Process Operations after Start-UP
Phase 1
APPRAISE
Phase 2
SELECT
Phase 3
DEFINE
Phase 4
EXECUTE
Phase 5
OPERATE
FEED PHASECONSULTING
Phase 1
VISION
Phase 2
DEFINE
Phase 3
REFINE
Phase 4
IMPLEMENT
Phase 5
OPTIMIZE
MAC SCOPE
FEED PHASE(Concept/Study)
MAC – Main Automation Contractor
Optimize process operations after project start activities
are completed and start-up team leaves. (3-12 months)
Time for data collection of key variable trends, control
reactions and loop interactions
Control Performance Consulting services to evaluate
process trends and recommend strategy modifications and
control tuning
Optimize Process Operations after Start-UP
Once the process operation is at an optimum performance
level, it is important to keep it there .
Use the system‟s tools
Asset Management
InSight
Avoid Replacement-in-Kind
Be leery of copying code from
the legacy system
Dead code not removed
Legacy code does not take
advantage of new system
configuration tools
Legacy strategy created to
overcome automation
deficiencies may hinder
performance in new system
Control Logic Conversion –PID Loop Represented in DeltaVControl Logic Conversion Control Logic Conversion ––PID Loop Represented in DeltaVPID Loop Represented in DeltaV
Control Logic Conversion –Loop RepresentationControl Logic Conversion Control Logic Conversion ––Loop RepresentationLoop Representation
A
10902_B7777_FC2
OUT
10902Y1
AIS/FBS
10902_B376_FC132_AI4
AI4
1090202
ASO
10902_B258_FC149_AO1
AO1
1090238
DIGRP
10902_B1105_FC84_DI1
DI1
1090226
T
S9#PRVLEAD:SEL
S1 OUT
S2
S3
10902Y1
F(X)
10902_B7787_FC1
S1 OUT
10902Y1
M/A MFC/P
10902_B7780_FC80
S1 A
S18 O
S3 SP
S4
S5
10902Y1
F(X)
10902_B7778_FC1
S1 OUT
10902Y1
OR
10902_B7776_FC40
S2 OUT
S3
10902Y1
APID
10902_B7773_FC156
S1 CO
S2
S3
S4
10902Y1
TSTQ
10902_B7772_FC31
S2 OUT
10902Y1
TSTQ
10902_B7771_FC31
S2 OUT
10902Y1
NOT
10902_B7770_FC33
S1 OUT
10902Y1
SQRT
10902_B7769_FC7
S1 OUT
10902Y1
ASO
10902_B258_FC149_S4
S4
1090238
Legacy Platform “Domain” ExpertiseIPA Aligned Deliverables
Phase 1 – Determine the EXACT HW & SW Basics
Phase 2 – Determine the EXACT Class & Custom Content
Phase 3 – Develop controller based Design Work Package
Phase 4 – Extract data in a form useful for project execution
Phase 5 – Generate FAT/SAT documentation for pre and post
start-up operations
Phase 1 Deliverables– Exact IO cont.
IO from the
Software Perspective
Phase 2 Deliverables “Class Content”
Class Content is
“Duplicated”
Phase 3 Deliverables“FEED Work Package”
Controller derived
Design Documents
are marked up and
hyperlinked to
manuals so non-SME
personnel can
interpret data
Phase 4:Execute
What to Watch Out
For
Tuning Conversions“ All PIDs are not Created Equal” Proper Unit Conversion of Existing
Tuning Constants
– minutes/repeat to seconds/repeat, seconds to minutes
– Gain or PB
– Repeats/minutes or minutes/repeat
Implementation of PID
– Form Identification (Parallel, Standard, or Classical)
– Multiple choices per system
– Selectable on each loop
– Tuning constants may produce different response in each PID Form
– All forms may not be capable of duplicating existing response
– Conversion between Forms
PID Options
– Derivative on Error or PV
– Gain on Error or PV
– Variations
Bailey DocumentationBailey Documentation
Bailey Documentation
Function Code 156
Clue: Parallel Blocks
Potential Confusion: Control System Terminology
Clue: S DomainTransfer Functions
Parallel Form PID Users
– MOD300*
– Infi90/Net90*
Standard Form PID Users– ABB Masterpiece, Advant
– RS3, DeltaV*
– VALMET Damatic Classic
– Measurex Open, Vision 2000
– Texas Instrument
– Yokogawa
– Honeywell*
Classical PID Forms Users– Honeywell *
– PROVOX, DPR900, DeltaV*
– FOX I/A, Spec 200
– Bailey INFI90*
– MOD300*
– Fischer-Porter Micro DCI
– Moore - APACS
Warning – Sometimes Tuning Constant Units are selectable on each PID loop!
Example: Rosemount System 3 (RS3)
– P = %PB or %out/%pv (normalized gain)
– I = Sec/Rep, Min/Rep or Hr/Rep
– D = Sec, Min or Hr
Suppose “AS-FOUND” Constants were:
– P=1.99
– I = 5.98
– D=1.49
And you assumed
– “P” was %out/%pv
– “I” was Sec/Rep
– “D” was Sec
BUT, what if…
Know the Destination! Know the Source!
Unit Conversions of Tuning Constants (Temperature Loop)
…the units were really P=1.99 %out/%pv, I = 5.98 min/rep
and D= 1.4 min for this loop
Source: Standard PID
P = 1.99 %out/%pv, I = 5.98 min/rep, D= 1.49 min.
Destination: Standard PID
P = 1.99 %out/%pv, I = 5.98 sec./rep, D= 1.49 sec.
Tuning Conversions“ All PIDs are not Created Equal” Proper Unit Conversion of Existing
Tuning Constants
– minutes/repeat to seconds/repeat, seconds to minutes
– Gain or PB
– Repeats/minutes or minutes/repeat
Implementation of PID
– Form Identification (Parallel, Standard, or Classical)
– Multiple choices per system
– Selectable on each loop
– Tuning constants may produce different response in each PID Form
– All forms may not be capable of duplicating existing response
– Conversion between Forms
PID Options
– Derivative on Error or PV
– Gain on Error or PV
– Variations
Bailey DocumentationBailey Documentation
Bailey Documentation
Function Code 156
Clue: Parallel Blocks
Potential Confusion: Control System Terminology
Clue: S DomainTransfer Functions
Parallel Form PID Users
– MOD300*
– Infi90/Net90*
Standard Form PID Users– ABB Masterpiece, Advant
– RS3, DeltaV*
– VALMET Damatic Classic
– Measurex Open, Vision 2000
– Texas Instrument
– Yokogawa
– Honeywell*
Classical PID Forms Users– Honeywell *
– PROVOX, DPR900, DeltaV*
– FOX I/A, Spec 200
– Bailey INFI90*
– MOD300*
– Fischer-Porter Micro DCI
– Moore - APACS
What if You Pick the Wrong Form?Parallel vs. Standard (Flow)
Source: Parallel PID P = 0.062 %out/%pv, I = 0.021gain/sec, D= 0
sec.
Normal Response:40 sec to reach setpoint
Destination: DeltaV Standard PID; Convert units but forgot to convert to
Standard tuning: P = 0.062 %out/%pv, I = 47.8 sec/rep, D= 0 sec.
Incorrect Response: 5-6 min to reach setpoint
What if You Pick the Wrong Form?Series vs. Standard (Temperature)
Source: Series PID: P = 1.04 %out/%pv, I = 0.323 rep/min, D= 2.88 min
Destination: DeltaV Standard PID; Convert units but forgot to convert to
Standard tuning: P = 1.04 %out/%pv, I = 186 sec/rep, D= 173 sec.
(Incorrect!)
Avoiding the “Gotchas”
Do investigate what new technology is available and
examining ways to use it to improve the process
Base automation system requirements on the system
as a tool for operations to run the plant easier
– Troubleshoot equipment failures
– Optimize the process
– Future system expansion
Specify the control system to meet operational
requirements
– Don‟t specify system component performance criteria, e.g.
process speed & monitor pixel number.
Avoiding the “Gotchas”
Look at Total Installed and Commissioned Cost versus
lowest cost equipment
– Lower cost of engineering and installation
– Built-in versus custom design
Base configuration on using capabilities in new system vs.
legacy system
Do not be afraid of using multiple field communication types
to match specific application
Make sure “Alarm Design” is a „process‟ engineer design
task/issue vs. control/automation engineer task/issue
– Identify alarm requirements based on process conditions
– Use of conditional alarming
Avoiding the “Gotchas”
Power & Grounding
– Make sure I/O power requirements are defined
• May need interposing relays for Discrete Outputs
– Grounding efficiency may have changed since legacy system
installation via additions to grounding grid
Control Loop Strategy
– Understand that control loops need to work as a “SYSTEM”
– What loops need to be tuned aggressively and which need to allow
natural process variability
Legacy Configuration Conversion
– Data Mining „ keep the good, get rid of the bad‟
– Legacy Tuning conversions
Summary: Part II
Risk Mitigation & Best Practices
– IPA Model & Industry Benchmarking
– Best Practices that Mitigate Risk & Improve Performance
– Mining the Legacy System Files
Lessons Learned: What to watch for?
– Plan, Plan, and Plan: Revisit the Plan and adjust as needed
– Use New Technology to Improve Operations
– TICC vs Lowest System Cost
– Mix/Match Communication Protocol to Application
– Alarm Design: Who Benefits from Getting it Right?
– Power & Grounding
– Legacy Tuning Conversions: Impact of getting it wrong
Associated Workshops and Roadmaps
Type Description
Roadmap RM-583 - Non-Emerson Systems Modernization (Migration)
Roadmap RM-581 - Emerson PROVOX & RS3 Systems Modernization
Roadmap RM-587 - Emerson Systems Services
Session 03-113 - Using FlexConnect to migrate your legacy DS to DeltaV
Session 03-304 - PROVOX and Siemens S5 to DeltaV migration during
operation
Session 03-406 - Total Installed and Commissioned Cost Savings Using
Electronic Marshalling in Brownfield Modernization Projects
Session 07-33 - How to Justify New “Smart” Automation Investments
Exhibit Hall - Product Showcase
Modernization
Pavilion
Entrance
Alice Stewart
Yassin Mobarak
Cody Long
John Dolenc
Gordon Lawther
Chris King
Laurie Ben
Mike French
Scott Ross Keith Bellville
Zaidan Kazour