![Page 1: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Module 10/11Stream Surveys
Stream Surveys – September 2004Part 2 – Habitat Assessment
![Page 2: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s2
Objectives
Students will be able to: identify accepted sampling methods used in
streams. explain the influence of velocity and current on
organism distribution in a stream. categorize stream bed substrates. Describe physical, chemical and biological
parameters used to assess the quality of stream habitats.
![Page 3: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s3
Stream assessments
Water quality Habitat Hydrologic Biological Watershed
![Page 4: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s4
Habitat assessments
![Page 5: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s5
Habitat Assessments
Determine and isolate impacts of pollution sources
Interpret biological data Screen for impairments
![Page 6: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s6
Habitat Scales - review
![Page 7: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s7
Where to sample
Reach Length 30 times mean stream width Minimum of 100 meters in length
Avoid bridges, dams, culverts etc. Localized effects on the stream Both upstream and downstream of the
structure. Locate reach nearby to specifically address
changes from structures
![Page 8: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s8
Transect Measurements
Necessity of measuring habitat variables in both pool and riffles and why
Slide to be completed by 3/31/04
![Page 9: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s9
Pool-Riffle-Run Sequences
![Page 10: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s10
Current velocity
Varies horizontally and vertically across the streambed
Current is the most important factor that determines where many organisms are found in streams and therefore govern differences in communities in various parts of a given stream.
Velocity of the current is determined by the steepness of the surface, roughness of the stream bed, and depth and width of the stream bed.
![Page 11: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s11
Substrate
![Page 12: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s12
Visual estimation of surface substrate
% of silt/clay, sand, gravel, cobble, boulder and bedrock
Fast, simple Prone to error
Slide to be completed by 3/31/04
![Page 13: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s13
Substrate
Sieves Especially for <2mm Sample size = bucketful ~ 3 samples
Slide to be completed by 3/31/04
![Page 14: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s14
Substrate - Pebble counts
100 individual pebbles randomly selected from stream bed
Measure intermediate axis Plot results as a
histogram
(Wolman 1954)
![Page 15: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s15
Pebble Count results
![Page 16: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s16
Embeddedness
Measure of fine sediment deposition in the interstitial spaces between rocks
High embeddedness values indicate habitat degradation
![Page 17: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s17
Substrate
Embeddedness: General guidelines 0% = no fine sediments even at base of top
layer of gravel/cobble 25% = rocks are half surrounded by sediment 50% = rocks are completely surrounded by
sediment but their tops are clean 75% = rocks are completely surrounded by
sediment and half covered 100% = rocks are completely covered by
sediment
![Page 18: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s18
Wentworth Scale of particle sizes
Silt/clay/mud fine
Sand up to 0.2 cm
Gravel (or pebbles) 0.2 – 6.4 cm
Cobbles 6.4 cm – 25.6 cm
Boulders greater than 25.6 cm
Bedrock Bigger than a car
![Page 19: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s19
Woody debris
Extremely important for habitat Difficult to quantify
![Page 20: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s20
EPA Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP)
The RBPs include a set of cost-effective, yet scientifically valid, stream quality indicators that include: Physical habitat assessment Water Quality assessment Biological surveys
Easily and quickly obtained
Compares data with standards fromunaffected site
![Page 21: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s21
RBP - parameters
Stream characterization Watershed features Riparian vegetation In-stream features Large woody debris Aquatic vegetation Water quality Sediment/substrate
![Page 22: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s22
RBP – stream characterization
Is stream flow perennial, intermittent? Are there any tidal influences?
Is the temperature regime considered warm water or coldwater?
Stream origin: glacial, montane, wetland, bog
![Page 23: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s23
RBP – watershed features
What is the predominant land use type within the watershed?
Are there any local nonpoint pollution sources?
Any signs of local watershed erosion ?
![Page 24: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s24
RBP – riparian vegetation
Width of the vegetation zone on either side of the stream
![Page 25: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s25
RBP – in-stream features
reach length stream width reach area velocity % canopy high water mark # riffles, runs, pools channelization dams
![Page 26: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s26
RBP – large woody debris and aquatic vegetation
Large woody debris Aquatic vegetation
periphyton macrophytes
![Page 27: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s27
RBP – water quality
Temperature, EC, DO, pH, and turbidity
Water odors Water surface oils Turbidity-visual
assessment
![Page 28: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s28
RBP – sediment and substrate
Odors Oils Deposits Inorganic substrate
components Organic substrate
components
![Page 29: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s29
Visual-Based Habitat Assessment (VHA)
This protocol rates habitat parameters for each sampling reach on a scale from 0 to 20 (highest).
The rankings are then totaled and compared to a reference condition to provide a final habitat ranking.
Habitat evaluations are made on: In-stream habitat Channel morphology Bank structural features Riparian vegetation
![Page 30: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s30
VHA - Habitat for aquatic insects and other creatures
Look for the amount and variety of structures in the stream, such as: rocks fallen trees undercut banks logs and branches
The more diverse the “structure” the better.
Poor
Very good
![Page 31: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s31
1b. Habitat for Aquatic Insects and Other Creatures Look for:
The amount and variety of structures in the stream, such as:RocksFallen treesUndercut banksLogs and branches
A lot of diverse “structure” is good
Poor
Very good
Mary
Kay C
ora
zalla
, U
of
MN
![Page 32: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s32
2a. Embeddedness
Look for: How much silt, sand, or mud cover rocks and
snags or is “embedded” among the rocks? Lots of silt reduces insect habitat and fish
shelter, spawning areas, and egg incubation areas
Poor
Very good
Will
iam
Taft
, M
I D
NR
Will
iam
Taft
, M
I D
NR
Poor
![Page 33: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s33
2b. Pool Substrate Condition
Look for: Type and condition of bottom of stream in
pool area Healthy stream has:
Firm sediment types, such as sand, gravel, rather than soft clay or silt
Aquatic plantsLots of variety
PoorVery good
Mary
Kay C
ora
zalla
, U
of
MN
![Page 34: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s34
3a. Velocity and Depth Regimes
Look for: Lots of variety in depths and
flow rates as you move downstream
Look for a combination of: Slow-deep Slow-shallow Fast-deep Fast-shallow
Provides more habitat for aquatic insects and fish
Poor
Mary
Kay C
ora
zalla
, U
of
MN
Very good
Will
iam
Taft
, M
I D
NR
Poor
![Page 35: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s35
3b. Pool Variability
Look for: Mixture of types of pools
Large-shallowLarge-deepSmall-shallowSmall-deep
A variety of pool types means good habitatPoor
Very good
Peg
gy M
org
an
, FL
DEP
Will
iam
Taft
, M
I D
NR
![Page 36: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s36
4a. Sediment Deposition
Look for: How much sediment
has been deposited in the stream channel as: IslandsPoints, barsShoalsPools filling in
Lots of sediment means lots of human impacts on stream
Very good
Poor
Deposited sediment
![Page 37: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s37
4b. Sediment Deposition
How much sediment has been deposited in the stream channel as: IslandsPoints, barsShoalsPools filling in
Lots of sediment means lots of human impacts on stream
Poor
Very good
![Page 38: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s38
5a. Channel Flow Status
Look for: How full is the
channel? If too much of the
streambed is exposed, habitat is limited and probably poor
Very good
Water is not reaching both banks; leaving much
of channel exposed.
Poor
![Page 39: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s39
5b. Channel Flow Status
How full is the channel? If too much of the streambed is exposed, habitat is limited
and probably poor
Poor
Very good
Water is not reaching both banks; leaving much of channel exposed.
Jam
es
Sta
hl, IN
DEM
![Page 40: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s40
6a. Channel Alteration
Look for: Human-caused
changes in the stream channel, such as:DeepenedStraightenedDiversions
These alterations mean less habitat
Very good
Poor
![Page 41: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s41
6b. Channel Alteration
Human-caused changes in the stream channel, such as:DeepenedStraightenedDiversions
These alterations mean less habitat
Poor
Very good
Joh
n M
axte
d,
DE D
NR
EC
![Page 42: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s42
7a. Frequency of Riffles
Look for: Frequency of riffles as you
look up or downstream Riffles are excellent habitat
for aquatic insects and fish Lots of riffles means good
habitat
Arrows showing frequency of
riffles and bends
Very good
Poor
![Page 43: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s43
7b. Channel Sinuosity
Look for: The number of twists and turns you see in
the stream A “curvy” stream
Has more habitatIs more stable during storms, thus reducing erosion
Sinuosity refers to the curviness of the stream
Poor
Very good
![Page 44: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s44
8a. Bank Stability
Look for: Condition of banks
No vegetationCrumbling banksOverly steep banksExposed tree rootsExposed soil
Presence of eroded stream banks means poor conditions for aquatic life
Very good
Poor
Stable streambank
Unstable streambank
MD
Save O
ur
Str
eam
s
![Page 45: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s45
8b. Bank Stability
Look for: Condition of banks
No vegetationCrumbling banksOverly steep banksExposed tree rootsExposed soil
Presence of eroded stream banks means poor conditions for aquatic life
Poor
Very good
Peg
gy M
org
an
, FL
DEP
![Page 46: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s46
9a. Bank Vegetation
Look for: Amount of vegetation on banks of stream Lots of vegetation
Holds soilsAbsorbs water, thus reducing bank erosionAbsorbs nutrients (through roots) Provides shade for stream
Good to have >90% vegetative cover on banks and in riparian area
Very good
Poor
![Page 47: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s47
9b. Bank Vegetative Protection
Look for: Amount of vegetation on banks of stream Lots of vegetation
Holds soilsAbsorbs water, thus reducing bank erosionAbsorbs nutrients (through roots) Provides shade for stream
Good to have >90% vegetative cover on banks and in riparian area
Poor
Very good
Peg
gy M
org
an
, FL
DEP
MD
Save O
ur
Str
eam
s
![Page 48: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s48
10a. Riparian Vegetative Zone Width
Look for: Width of riparian zone (vegetated area
adjacent to stream) Wider riparian area helps
buffer pollutantsControl erosionProvide habitatRegulate nutrient inputs
Poor
Very good
![Page 49: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s49
10b. Riparian Vegetative Zone Width
Look for: Width of riparian zone (vegetated area
adjacent to stream) Wider riparian area helps
buffer pollutantsControl erosionProvide habitatRegulate nutrient inputs
PoorVery good
MD
Save O
ur
Str
eam
s
![Page 50: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s50
2. Low Gradient Streams
Less steep, slower moving
Low gradient streams are dominated by deep areas (pools) interspersed with shallower segments of river (glides). The stream bottom is typically made of up fine sediments and occasional coarser material (gravel or larger).
Low
Gra
die
nt
Str
eam
s
![Page 51: Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56649ef05503460f94c011f0/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Developed by: Richards, Reed, Ruzycki Updated: Sept 2004 U3-m10/11b-s51
Stream surveys - references
Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations Reports http://water.usgs.gov/pubs/twri/
National Field Manual for the Collection of Water-Quality Data http://water.usgs.gov/owq/FieldManual/
Rapid bioassessment protocols for wadeable streams http://www.epa.gov/owow/monitoring/rbp/