Naranpura – Ward no 12
Naranpura
Memnagar
Chandlodia
WadejGhatlodia
Alagarsamy Nikhil Sandeep Nipun Niepukhrie Hardik
Distances from major destinations in Ahmedabad
Kalupur Railway St. 8..4 KmAirport 8 KmCG Road 2.5 KmAshram Road 6.5 KmSG Highway 6.1 KmUniversity 1.5 KmWalled City 5.0 Km
Area 2.62 sq.km. (262 ha)
Population 83272 (Census 2001)
Density 318 pph
Road Length 20.30 Km
Road Density 6.13 Km/sq.km.
• 1970 - Authorities Tried To Restrict The Growth of the city by proposing a
Green Buffer.
• 1987 to 90 - Encroachments started happening in Green Belt. Then,
Authorities
• allowed Housing Board to develop some of the area for Residential.
• 1991 - Population – 63,293 [Source: Census 1991]Density – 180 persons per hectare.
2001- Population – 83,272 [Source: Census 2001]Density – 237 persons per hectare.Population Growth – 31%2009- BRTS was introduced on the132’ ring road2011- Population – 88,200[Source: Census 2011]Density – 266 persons per hectare.Population Growth – 6.02%
T
i
m
e
l
i
n
e
P
e
o
p
l
e
Religion Mostly Hindus (Low diversity)
Region Mostly Gujratis(some Rajasthanis and Marathis)
Income Higher MIG and HIG
Occupation Mostly Business class
Slums Almost 25% population living in slums and Gamtal
Sanjay Nagar
Chamunda NagarGamtal Slums next to railway track
Ward Area (ha) Population Density (pph)
Naranpura (Actual) 331.57 83272 251.14
Naranpura (Effective) 262.02 83272 317.81
Chandolia 369 62540 169.49
Ranip 324 87906 271.31
Naroda Road 352 83751 237.93
Bapunagar 175.6 90031 512.71
Paldi 455 74957 164.74
Vejalpur 369 113445 307.44
Maninagar 274 87900 320.80
Isanpur 391 113949 291.43
Ahmedabad City(AMC) 19084 3520085 184.45
Ahmedabad Old City 560.00
0.00
100.00
200.00
300.00
400.00
500.00
600.00
Naranpura (Actual)
Naranpura (Effective)
Chandolia
Ranip
Naroda Road
Bapunagar
Paldi
Vejalpur
Maninagar
Isanpur
Ahmedabad City(AMC)
Ahmedabad Old City
D
e
n
s
i
t
i
e
s
GROSS FSI : 0.98
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s
R
o
a
d
H
i
e
r
a
r
c
h
y
Functional Hierarchy Road Lengths
• BRTS – 2.997 km • Arterial – km • Collector – 17.697km
-
500.00
1,000.00
1,500.00
2,000.00
2,500.00
3,000.00
3,500.00
4,000.00
4,500.00
40m -BRTS
30m 28m 25m 22m 20m 18m 16m 15m 12m 9m
2,029.84
3,055.54
733.64 884.54
335.10
1,328.24
4,430.30
2,338.37
1,276.35
2,093.22 1,792.11
Ro
ad L
en
gth
(in
M)
Road Type
Existing Road Length
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
Demand 48%
Distribution 52%
Demand Vs Distribution
Treatment Capacity
63%
Storage Capacity
37%
Treatment Vs Storage Capacity
Distribution
22%
Treatment Capacity
78%
Distribution Vs Treatment
•Water lines in this ward are covering 98% of Area (Grid Design)
•Diameter of pipes varies from 80mm to 750mm
The Water supply per day is 13.75 MLD and existing storage tanks in 3 locations are able to store 28.5 ML, which will be able to support for future expansion.
The Water supply from 5.30 am to 8.00 am as Staggered supply. Source from French Well in Sabarmati & Narmada river.
48 48
19.37
28.53
13.75 14.553
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2001 2011
Qu
anti
ty (
in M
LD)
Years
Water Supply Status (Existing)
Treatment Capacity
Storage
Supply
Facts About Existing Situation
•Normal Days 165 LPCD
•During Festival Season 180 LPCD
•Water Demand 12.49 ML
•Water Distribution 13.75 ML
•Storage Capacity 28.53 ML
•(OH 0.75ML + 9.46 ML UG & 2 * 9.16 ML UG)
•Treatment Capacity 48 ML (@ Source)
•No. of House Connection 18,664
W
a
t
e
r
S
u
p
p
l
y
•Sewer lines in this ward are covering 91% of toilets.
•Diameter of pipes varies from 42” to 12”
The sewage generated is 6.37 MLD and these pipes are able to
support 40 MLD , which will be able to support for future expansion.
There are around 500 manholes in the whole ward.
7.15
7.57
5.60
5.80
6.00
6.20
6.40
6.60
6.80
7.00
7.20
7.40
7.60
7.80
2001 2011 2021 2031
Dem
and
(in
MLD
)
Year
Sewerage Network
Demand - Normal Growth
Natural Ground Slope
S
e
w
e
r
a
g
e
Sewerage Network Capacity Analysis
YearPopulation (Normal Growth)
Demand -Normal Growth
2001 83,272 6.37
2011 88,200 6.75
2021 93,420 7.15
2031 98,948 7.57
Naranpura(Ward 12)
Storm water lines in this ward are lined on most of the roads, which serves adequately during rainy days
• Av. Rainfall – 980 mm (2000-2010)
• Drained – Sabarmati (non perennial river)
• Requires less treatment
S
t
o
r
m
W
a
t
e
r
EXPECTED WASTE
GENERATED
(Kgs/ Capita/ Day)
WASTE
COLLECTED
(Kgs/ Capita/ Day)
DIFFERENCE (Kgs/
Capita/ Day)
0.5 0.47 0.03
S
o
l
i
d
W
a
s
t
e
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
Sector Data Analysis Issues
Roads And
Transport
Road Hierarchy Road Width And Function Complement Each Other Good Wide Roads
Where Parking Is Not A
Nuisance As Such
Mismanaged Junctions and
garbage dumping creates
issues at some places
Parking On Street Parking
Hawkers 3 Main Chunks Of Hawkers
hawkers No demarcated place for hawkers
Land use Land Use distribution Stabalised residential conditions
Land use – roads Mix land use along the major arterial roads
FSI – roads Higher FSI being used along the arterial roads
Infrastructure Water Supply 50% of the available storage capacity being used Water being supplied for
only 2 hours.
No inpatient facility
available in government
hospitals in a radius of 5 km
around he ward
Sewerage 100% area being served
Education Municipal school being used mainly by the LIG
people (private schools being unaffordable for LIG)
but lacks basic facilities
Healthcare facilities 3.5 beds (private) per 1000 people in the ward
Street Light Serves all the areas except the stretch along the
railway line.
V
i
s
i
o
nPromoting a more compact, resource efficient Urban development by managing the growth of Urban boundary
with a higher density for development and providing sufficient green space to avoid over crowding.
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Developing the green belt in a holistic manner by using its potential and stitching the urban fabric on either side of the belt
Densify the stretch along the BRTS and introducing commercial nodes near the BRTS stops
Creating better housing conditions in Sanjay Nagar slum with better infrastructure and community open spaces.
Creating a pedestrian friendly environment and encouraging public transport
Introducing more open spaces to compliment and support the high rise high density development which is being proposed
NARANPURA AHMEDABAD VEJALPUR
Year Population Growth Population Growth Population Growth
1991 63,293 28,76,710 92,160
2001 83,272 31% 35,20,085 22% 1,13,443 23%
2011 88,200 6% 55,70,585 58% 2,93,672 159%
SOURCE: AMC Ward office; Census 1991, 2001, 2011 and Vejalpur Group.
G
r
e
e
n
B
e
l
t
GREEN BELT IN WEST AHMEDABAD.
GREEN BELT FALLING IN NARANPURA.
(15% of total Green Belt)
• After 20 years, Supreme Court of India gave judgment
- 40% of the Land in Green Belt will be acquired by the AMC from the Private
Owners which will include the space required Infrastructure.
- The rest 60% of the land will be allowed for development by the Private
Owners.
What happens if AMC challenges that judgement??
It might take another 20 years to give another judgement which might be
similar to present one.
Meanwhile
HISTORY
repeats
Why ?
G
r
e
e
n
B
e
l
t
What happens if Neither AMC nor Owners don’t challenge the judgement?
INR.3465 Cr @ 42,000 per Sq.ft
With 27.6 Ha, AMC will provide all basic infrastructure to support developments in green
belt because it is its RESPONSIBILITY and Developments in remaining 41.4 ha are
MARKET DRIVEN.
Market Driven Developments are should be in such a way
- To use maximum potential of land and Rapid Access,
- Orderly developed,
- helps to minimise horizontal spatialization of City.
Service Provision + Using maximum Potential = Planned Development
Why ?
G
r
e
e
n
B
e
l
t
Step 1: Stitching the two sides of through Roads
Option 1: Arterial Road between Naranpura and Ghatlodia.
Outcomes & Implications:
• Acts as a boundary.
• Runs parallel to 132 ft. BRTS Road.
• Will support development in Naranpura
as well as Ghatlodia.
• Will affect sudden change in character of Skyline.
• Will encourage Private transportation
• Creates a valley between two high rise
commercial Zones.
Option 2: Arterial Road on the internal boundary of
greenbelt.
Outcomes & Implications:
• Forms a connecting road for
all internal roads through the
belt.• Will support developments relatively
closer to BRTS.
• land falling between BRTS and this road
may become linear CBD in few years
because of its high potential.
How ?
G
r
e
e
n
B
e
l
t
Step 2: Holistic Approach for new land Use.
Merging Option 1 & 2
• 18 M or 24 M Collector roads on
both sides of belt.
• Planned in such way to encourage
commercial wont be a disturbance
to residential.
• Direct or easy access to BRTS.
• Concentration of Commercial
land use planned along road
1 & 2.
Residential land Use Fabric
How ?
Residential49%
Commercial6%
Mixed use4%
Institutional4%
Green Areas19%
Playground2%
Open Areas2% Roads
14%
Green Belt Landuses
G
r
e
e
n
B
e
l
t
Residential49%
Commercial6%
Mixed use4%
Institutional4%
Green Areas19%
Playground2%
Open Areas2% Roads
14%
Green Belt Landuses
G
r
e
e
n
B
e
l
t
Stitching
Residential49%
Commercial6%
Mixed use4%
Institutional4%
Green Areas19%
Playground2%
Open Areas2% Roads
14%
Green Belt Landuses
G
r
e
e
n
B
e
l
t
G
r
e
e
n
B
e
l
t
• Total Green Belt Area = 69 Ha
• 40% of Land (AMC land) = 27.6 Ha
• Proposed land for Public uses (25.85 Ha)
– Roads 9.61 Ha
– Open Areas 1.46 Ha
– Green Areas 13.5 Ha
– Playground 1.28 Ha
• AMC land in Green belt (2.55 Ha)
– Garden 1.25 Ha
– School 0.85 Ha
– Parks 0.44 Ha
• Land Left with AMC (27.6 Ha + 2.55 Ha – 25.85 Ha) = 4.30
Ha = 51,427.57 Sq. Yard
• Land Value, For Rs.42000 / Sq. Yard = Rs 2,159,958/-
S
l
u
m
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Sanjay NagarDeveloping the slum in the same area where it was existing.A low rise – high density solution with 330 sqft. of spaceprovided to each household.1400 households with a population of 6900 to be providedwith a G+1 housing typology.
What Existing Proposed
Residential Land 3.40 ha 51000 sq.m. BuA 3.05 ha 61000 sq.m. BuA
Public Greens - - 0.5 ha 0.75 sq.m./person
Commercial 0.12 ha - 0.8 ha
Roads 0.06 ha - 0.5 ha
S
l
u
m
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Source : Aranya Housing, Indore
S
l
u
m
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Source : Aranya Housing, Indore
O
p
e
n
B
u
i
l
t
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
Built32%
Open68%
O
p
e
n
B
u
i
l
t
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Built26%
Open74%
B
R
T
S
Why ?
• Potential of Land along the BRTS which runs parallel to CG Road and SG highway.
• It is not creating much income to authorities.
• There is no relation between the potential and Functions.
• It has a natural fabric of mix land use.
• Main objective of BRTS of supporting more public transport
is not happening.
• Providing more commercial & institutional land uses
Will increase occupancy rate of BRTS.
PICS
Building Heights Map
B
R
T
S
How ?
Existing Land Use
Proposed Land Use
• Hierarchy of Land Use from BRTS to two sides.
• Variable allocation of land use along the BRTS,
depending on the high potential nodal points.
• Commercial land use is proposed where there are two
very close BRTS stops and where it already existed.
• Width of particular land use is subjective to existing
roads.
• Width of particular land use is subjective to existing roads.
• FSI of 4 to commercial and 3 to both mixed & residential land use
with 30% ground coverage.
1
2
5
43
For 1, 2 and 3
• Present residents of proposed commercial along
side of BRTS will be shifted to new apartments
which are going to build by increasing FSI in the
same housing board.
• Fiscal resources will be used by selling Vacant
lands of AMC.
For 4 and 5
• Proposed commercial
developments are completely
open to market by considering its
natural mixed land use fabric.
B
R
T
S
B
R
T
S
Skyline of Naranpura from BRTS
O
p
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
sArea Population Per Capita open Space
Existing Public Open Spaces
9.66 Ha. 88200 1.1 Sq. M/Person
O
p
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
sArea Population Per Capita Open
Space
Existing Public Open Spaces
9.66 Ha. 88200 1.1 Sq. M/Person
Proposed Public Open Spaces
25.44 Ha. 135122 1.88 Sq. M/Person
O
p
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
sArea Population Per Capita Open
Space
Existing Public Open Spaces
9.66 Ha. 88200 1.1 Sq. M/Person
Proposed Public Open Spaces
25.44 Ha. 135122 1.88 Sq. M/Person
Sl.No. Gardens Area
1 Law Garden 5.87 Hectares
2 Naranpura Garden 5.67 Hectares
3 Vastrapur Garden 4.27 Hectares
4 AUDA Garden-Bopal Road 3.70 Hectares
5 Parimal Garden 3.54 Hectares
6 Mirambika Garden 1.31 Hectares
7 Pragati Nagar 1.30 Hectares
O
p
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
s
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
32 m wide road
12 m wide road9 m wide road
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
36 m wide road
18 m wide road 24 m wide road
H
a
w
k
e
r
s
1
2
3 9 m wide (250 m long) pedestrian street fororganised hawking activities with commercialon one side and park on the other.
1
2 2000 sq.m. of dedicated vegetable and fruit market
Analysis for Future Water Demand
Treatment Storage Supply Demand (Normal) Demand
2001 83,272 83,272 48 19.37 13.75 12.49 12.49
2011 88,200 88,200 48 28.53 14.553 13.23 13.23 Addl tank - 9.16 ML
2021 93,420 110,420 48 28.53 14.01 16.56 150 lpcd
2031 98,948 156,237 48 28.53 14.84 23.44 150 lpcd
RemarksYear
Population
(Green Belt
Population
Growth
Parameters (in MLD)
48 48 48 48
19.37
28.53 28.53 28.53
13.75 14.553
12.49 13.23 14.01 14.84
23.44
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2001 2011 2021 2031 2041 2051
Qu
anti
ty (
in M
LD)
Years
Water Demand Analysis
Treatment Capacity
Storage
Supply
Demand (Normal)
Demand (Green & BRTS)
Poly. (Demand (Normal))
Poly. (Demand (Green & BRTS))
If Population increase based on Greenbelt & BRTS developments, Naranpura ward required additional storage tank facility during the year 2036
W
a
t
e
r
S
u
p
p
l
y
Sewerage Network Capacity Analysis
YearPopulation
(Normal Growth)
Population (Green Belt &
BRTS)Demand - Normal
GrowthDemand (Green
Belt & BRTS) Remarks
2001 83,272 83,272 6.37 6.37
2011 88,200 88,200 6.75 6.75
2021 93,420 1,10,420 7.15 8.45
2031 98,948 1,56,237 7.57 11.95
7.15 7.57 6.37 6.75
8.45
11.95
-
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
2001 2011 2021 2031
Dem
and
(in
MLD
)
Year
Sewerage Network
Demand - NormalGrowth
Demand (Green Belt& BRTS)
S
e
w
e
r
a
g
e
I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
Infrastructure
Status
Current (2011)Projection
(2031)Remarks
Watersupply Supply 14.55 ML (165 LPCD)23.44 ML (150
LPCD)
Required additional
storage tank facility during the year 2036
Sewerage Generated 6.75 ML 11.95 ML
Existing Sewerage
System can carry 40 ML
Stormwater Rainfall 980 mm (Avg) N ADrained -
Sabarmati River
Solid waste Management
Collection Efficiency
95%Needs to
improve public awareness.
Street LightSufficient Lighting on
streets
N
a
r
a
n
p
u
r
a
2
0
3
0
Residential53%
Commercial3%
Mixed use11%
Institutional (PU / Semi PU)
3%
Green Areas5%
Playground3%
Open Areas3%
Roads19%
Final Landuse
Area 3.31 sq.km. (262 ha)
Population 156237 (Projection 2031)
Density 472 pph
Road Length 33.7 Km
Road Density 10.18 Km/sq.km.