Page 3
IRS Circular 230 disclosure
Any US tax advice contained herein was not intended orwritten to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose ofavoiding penalties that may be imposed under the InternalRevenue Code or applicable state or local tax lawprovisions.
These slides are for educational purposes onlyand are not intended, and should not be relied upon, asaccounting advice.
Page 4
► EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more,of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of whichis a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young LLP is a client-serving memberfirm of Ernst & Young Global Limited located in the US.
► This presentation is © 2014 Ernst & Young LLP. All rights reserved.No part of this document may be reproduced, transmitted or otherwisedistributed in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical,including by photocopying, facsimile transmission, recording, rekeying,or using any information storage and retrieval system, without writtenpermission from Ernst & Young LLP. Any reproduction, transmission ordistribution of this form or any of the material herein is prohibited and isin violation of US and international law. Ernst & Young LLP expresslydisclaims any liability in connection with use of this presentation or itscontents by any third party.
► Views expressed in this presentation are not necessarily those ofErnst & Young LLP.
Disclaimer
Page 5
Today’s presenters
Elizabeth Summers, NIKEMatthew Duncan, Ernst & Young LLP
Tom Knoeller, Ernst & Young LLPCheryl Belles, Ernst & Young LLP – Moderator
Page 6
Worldwide reporting in the taxtransparency age
How they are manifestingthemselves► Base erosion and profit shifting
(BEPS), including country-by-country (CbC) reporting
► Increased international informationsharing (e.g., FATCA)
► Tax authorities taking a moresophisticated approach to audits
► Accelerated rate of tax law changes► Stricter auditing standards, including
EU audit reform
Issues companies havealready been addressing► Responding to growth from new and
emerging markets► Sustaining cost reductions without
compromising value► Responding to complex regulatory,
accounting and tax change andincreased uncertainty andenforcement risk
► Driving value through financeand tax
Page 7
Timeline of CbC reporting conceptdevelopment
► June 2013 — G8 leaders call on OECD to develop a template for CbCreporting to tax authorities
► July 2013 — OECD BEPS Action Plan — Action 13 transfer pricingdocumentation, including CbC template
► July 2013 — OECD White Paper on Transfer Pricing Documentation► October 2013 — OECD Memorandum on Transfer Pricing Documentation
and Country by Country Reporting► January 2014 — OECD Discussion Draft on Transfer Pricing Documentation
and CbC Reporting — proposed template released► February 2014 — More than 1,200 pages of comments submitted to OECD► March and May 2014 — Consultations on Discussion Draft► May 2014 — OECD Working Party expected to finish work on the template► June–July 2014 — OECD expected to approve template for release► By September 2014 — OECD expected to release recommended
CbC reporting template
Page 8
Proposed CbC reporting templateProposed CbC reporting templateC
ount
ry
Con
stitu
ente
ntiti
esor
gani
zed
inth
eco
untr
y
Plac
eof
effe
ctiv
em
anag
emen
t
Impo
rtan
tbus
ines
sac
tivity
code
(s)
Rev
enue
s
Earn
ings
befo
rein
com
eta
x
Income tax paid(on cash basis)
Tota
lwith
hold
ing
tax
paid
Stat
edca
pita
land
accu
mul
ated
earn
ings
Num
ber
ofem
ploy
ees
Tota
lem
ploy
eeex
pens
e
Tang
ible
asse
tsot
her
than
cash
and
cash
equi
vale
nts
Roy
altie
spa
idto
cons
titue
nten
titie
s
Roy
altie
sre
ceiv
edfr
omco
nstit
uent
entit
ies
Inte
rest
paid
toco
nstit
uent
entit
ies
Inte
rest
rece
ived
from
cons
titue
nten
titie
s
Serv
ice
fees
paid
toco
nstit
uent
entit
ies
Serv
ice
fees
rece
ived
from
cons
titue
nten
titie
s
(a) Tocountry oforganization
(b) Toall othercountries
1.
2.
3.
4.
Total:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Total:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Total:
Page 9
Tax controversy risk
92% of the largest companies think that global disclosure and transparencyrequirements will continue to grow in the next two years.
69% of the largest companies report that they feel tax audits have become moreaggressive in the last two years.
68% of the largest companies report that they feel tax authorities globally haveincreased their focus on cross-border transactions in the last two years.
Leading enterprise sources of tax risk in order of prevalence:► Insufficient resources to cover tax function activities: 75%► Insufficient internal communication: 64%► A lack of processes or technology: 57%
* EY 2014 Global Controversy Survey covering 830 tax and finance executives in 25 markets
Page 10
How are jurisdictions altering their corporateincome tax base in 2014?
*Based upon an EY survey of 61 jurisdictions
Page 11
Need to articulate your total tax picture
► What is youreconomicinvestment?
► What is the impactof your supply chainand employeespending on thelocal economy?
► Where do you operate?► Why do you operate there?
► Your total taxcontribution
► Your indirectcontributionthrough suppliers,employees, etc.
► What visibility andcontrol do youhave?
► How are youmonitoring taxdevelopments?
Protectingyour brand
Page 12
Defining global compliance and reporting(GCR)
GCR comprises the key elements of a company’s finance and taxprocesses that prepare statutory financial and tax filings as required incountries around the world.
Record-to-report and GCR
Record andprocess
transactions
Legal entityfinancial
accounting
Taxaccounting
andprovisions
Statutoryreportingand legal
entitycompliance
Corporateincome taxcompliance
Transferpricing
Tax planningand
controversymanagement
Governance and control
Indirect taxcompliance
Page 14
NIKE brands and affiliates
► NIKE Action Sports► NIKE Athletic Training► NIKE Basketball► NIKE Digital Sport► NIKE Football► NIKE Football (Soccer)► NIKE Running► NIKE Sportswear► NIKE Tennis► NIKE Women’s► Air Jordan► Converse, Inc.► Hurley International, LLC► NIKE Golf
Page 16
GCR objectives
► Achieve full visibility to the status of tax filings, includingproactive identification and resolution of potential issuesor risky tax positions
► Improved timeliness of filings► Centralized access to tax filings, entity information and
engagement information► Improved connection to local developments –
controversy, regulatory developments and localbusiness changes
► Visibility and control over scope and fees► Improved discussions on tax planning opportunities
Page 17
The evolution of GCR governance
Global technologyGlobal, regional andlocal experience
Standardized globalprocesses and protocols
Visibility into the status of GCR
Connection to local tax andaccounting developments
Access to entity information, tax filingsand tax attributes
Centralized control over costs
Establishing control, accessand visibility
Streamlined data gathering
Standardization of policies, proceduresand deliverables
Enabling local and global planning
Global control of accountingand compliance
Achieving the optimal balance of controlefficiency and value
Page 18
A path to move forward
Practical considerations to developing an approach to achieve a GCRprocess within your organization
Who Stakeholders
What Extent of processes (e.g., accounting, compliance, controversy)Budget considerations
When Timing considerations aligned with organizational initiativesWhere Implementation across portions or the entire organization