Download - Open Science: new collaborative tools
Open Science in practice: new collaborative tools
Elena GigliaOpen Access office – University of Turin
[email protected] Photos are mine, https://www.flickr.com/photos/eg65/albums
Zen scholarly communication?
SKILLS AND SERVICES NEEDED FOR THE GREAT CONVERSATION SHOULD SERVE ITS OBJECTIVES, NOT THE REVERSE.
WHAT DOES SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION NEED TO WORK? crystals of knowledge
a set of peers
Stern, Niels, Guédon, Jean-Claude; Jensten, Thomas Wiben (2015). Crystals of Knowledge Production. An Intercontinental Conversation about Open Science and the Humanities. “Nordic Perspectives on Open Science”, [S.l.], v. 1, p. 1–24, oct. 2015
https://101innovations.wordpress.com/
https://101innovations.wordpress.com/
A blurred environment…
Kramer, Bianca (2016), Defining the scholarly Commons. Reimagining research communications. Workshop notes and visualizations, Feb. 2016
600
Going deeper…
A shift towards pre-prints
http://biorxiv.org/
http://asapbio.org/
http://www.nature.com/news/biologists-urged-to-hug-a-preprint-1.19384
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/352/6288/899.full
https://www.statnews.com/2016/05/27/preprint-biology-bioxriv/
New trends in publishing
https://thewinnower.com/
http://f1000research.com/articles/5-632/v1
A change of perspective
https://www.pubpub.org/
https://www.scienceopen.com/
A change of content
Loosening the grip
https://www.openlibhums.org/
http://www.lingoa.eu/
http://www.knowledgeunlatched.org/
Bridging the gaphttp://www.rapidscience.org/reward-metrics/
Building together
https://www.authorea.com/
https://hypothes.is/
https://www.overleaf.com/
http://f1000.com/work/
Not only texts
https://github.com/
https://figshare.com/
https://zenodo.org/ http://www.slideshare.net/
Not only authors
https://publons.com/
https://www.peerageofscience.org/
Redesigning
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01302597
http://www.openscholar.org.uk/institutional-repositories-start-to-offer-peer-review-services/
Peer review?
http://retractionwatch.com/
FC. Fang, A. Casadevall, Retracted Science and the Retraction Index, Infection and Immunity, 2011; 79(10): 3855–3859
Competition or collaboration?
Brembs, Digital Scholarship and Open Science need a digital infrastructure , Nov. 2015
http://blog.scienceopen.com/2016/04/how-can-academia-kick-its-addiction-to-the-impact-factor/
https://royalsociety.org/events/2015/04/future-of-scholarly-scientific-communication-part-1/
Flying high
https://royalsociety.org/events/2015/04/future-of-scholarly-scientific-communication-part-1
Opening up evaluation
http://blog.scienceopen.com/2016/02/the-open-citation-index/ http://sparceurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Evaluate-SEBriefingPaper-1215.pdf
http://www.nature.com/news/bibliometrics-the-leiden-manifesto-for-research-metrics-1.17351
http://www.ascb.org/dora/
E.Giglia, Un altro mondo è possibile: dall’Open Access alla Open Science, Bibliotime 1 2016
That’s all!