OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 1
SSA Programme
OPS-G Forum
5th December 2008, ESOC, Darmstadt
N.Bobrinsky, ESA
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 2
Need for a European SSA System Space assets have become indispensable enablers for a wide spectrum of
applications. The European independent utilisation of space for research or services depends on the capability to safely operate the European space infrastructures.
SSA serves the implementation of the strategic missions of the European Space Policy based on peaceful use of outer space by all states, by supporting the autonomous capacity to securely and safely operate the critical European space infrastructures
Space based capabilities are indispensable to realise this commitment in an effective manner . The dependency on these space based assets will grow, as evident also outside Europe. This dependency raises concerns, because any shutdown of even a part of the space infrastructure would have major consequences for economic activities and would considerably impair the organisation of e.g. emergency services.
SSA also serves the EU “Lisbon objectives” by supporting the development of new applications, new jobs and new market opportunities in the space sector
Space Situational Awareness can be seen as a basis for any future measures (political, diplomatic, regulatory, technical) to guarantee access to space
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 3
Initials steps in establishing a European SSA System
• Initial studies: ESA has performed in 2006-2008 several industrial studies, the outcome of which was: the compilation of a SSA Users’ Needs list (established by a selected group of
Users Representatives) The translation of these needs into technical requirements the identification of high level architectural options the identification of potential technological gaps
• SSA URG important role: A Users' representatives group continuously supports ESA in this initiative. The Group is composed by representatives of EU Military Staff, EDA, EC, Ministries of Defence of I, F, UK, E, D, B, N, by National Space Agencies of I, F, UK, E, D, B, N, CH, by the UN-WMO, by commercial operators (e.g. Inmarsat, Eutelsat) and insurance companies (e.g. MARSH). This User’s Group will continue its advisory role during the execution of the SSA Programme.
• Formal go ahead for the Programme Proposal: Consultation of ESA Member States at Council level has taken place in December 2007. The SSA initiative has been very well received. As a result, an Enabling Resolution (March 2008) has mandated ESA to prepare a Programme Proposal for the ESA Ministerial Council in November 2008.
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 4
Objectives and general context
The general objective is the establishment of a reliable and coherent SSA Programme covering the time frame 2009 – 2019. The first phase will consist of a SSA preparatory Programme and will cover the period 2009 - 2011
2009 - 2011 : Governance, Data PolicyRequirements, architecture of the future
European SSA system, delivery of precursor services
radar bread boarding, pilot Data Centres
Phase 2 (2012 – 2019): Implementation of a fully operational European SSA system
The first part of this Programme, the SSA Preparatory Programme, has been prepared for approval at the MC 2008, and has been approved !
The second part of this Programme, the SSA-Phase 2, will be prepared during 2011, taking into account the results of the SSA preparatory Programme, and is planned to be submitted to the approval of ESA Member States at the MC2011 (tbc). It will cover the timeframe 2012-2019.
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 5
The four domains of the European SSA System
The European SSA System can be broken down in four distinct domains:
a) Survey and Tracking of objects in Earth-bound orbitsb) Imagingc) Space Weatherd) Near Earth Objects (NEOs): hazardeous asteroids and comets
During the preparatory Programme (2009 – 2011), only Survey and Tracking, as well as Space Weather and NEOs domains will be addressed.
The Imaging of space targets, especially from sensors in Space will beaddressed at a later stage (phase 2, as from 2012), once the governance, data policy and data security matters will have been solved.
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 6
European SSA – high level overview
Ground-basedRadar and Optical
Sensors
Ground-basedSpace Weather
SensorsSpace Sensors
SSA Center(s)
User 1 User 2 User 3 User XUser 5User 4
SSA Data Policy
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 7
European SSA System – Functional Diagram
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 8
European SSA System – Functional Diagram
Dataprocessing
Country A – Data Centre
Classified DB – « A »
« A »Declassified DB
Country A - SSA Sensors
Debris
Space environment
NEO Spacecrafts
Dataprocessing
Country B – Data Centre
Classified DB – « B »
Country B - SSA Sensors
European SSA Sensors
Dataprocessing
European SSA – Data Centre
European SSAClassified DB
European SSADeclassified DB
« B »Declassified DB
User
Se
rvic
es
User
Se
rvic
es
User
Se
rvic
es
European SSA Users Country “B” Users
Country “A” Users
Classified flow of information
Unclassified flow of information
filtering
filtering
filtering
Commercial Users
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 9
Survey and Tracking (1)
Survey and Tracking Services
Detection and Tracking of objects in Earth-bound orbits (LEO, MEO, GEO, HEO) Identification and correlation of tracked objects Establishment of a catalogue Tasking of radar and optical sensors for follow-up observations During the development / prototyping phase, distribution of optical and radar tracking data, according to an agreed Data Policy Identification of high-risk conjunctions between tracked objects, issue of alerts and recommendations for avoidance manoeuvres Prediction of high-risk re-entry events and initiation of alert procedures detection of on-orbit explosions or collisions and issue of alerts
The Survey and Tracking Sensors can be very expensive (ca. 120 ME fora ground-based surveillance radar, able to detect 10cm objects at 1000 Km)
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 10
Survey and Tracking (2)
Estimated number of objects in orbit
space objects larger than d [cm]
LEO MEO-L MEO-H MEO-H & GEO
GEO
d [cm] count res.[%] trans.[%]
res.[%] res.[%] trans.[%]
res.[%]
100 4,658 50.0 17.5 0.9 4.5 7.1 20.0
50 6,549 52.3 18.1 2.7 3.7 7.0 16.2
30 9,091 56.6 16.5 2.2 3.3 7.2 14.1
10 20,505 54.2 13.6 1.0 3.9 10.7 16.4
5 44,092 48.6 13.5 0.5 4.5 14.3 18.4
3 90,541 44.8 15.1 0.2 4.8 15.9 19.0
1 606,474 32.1 23.3 0.2 5.6 24.8 13.8
altitudes [km] 120 to 2,000 km 15,000 to 38,000 km
observability radar difficult optical
Distribution and observability of space objects (MASTER 2005)
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 11
Survey and Tracking (3)
Distribution of objects in Earth orbit
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 12
Survey and Tracking (4)
Sensors for surveillance and tracking (images provided by H.Klinkrad and H.Krag)
Graves (France) – Bi-static surveillance radar
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 13
Survey and Tracking (5)
Sensors for surveillance and tracking
FGAN (Germany) – tracking radar
Zimmerwald (Switzerland) Tracking telescope
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 14
Survey and Tracking (6)
Sensors for surveillance and tracking
Cobra Dane (USA) – surveillance and tracking radar
AN/FPS-85 – Eglin AFB
UHF: 442 MHz
32 MW peak power
5134 TX modules
4660 RX modules
Vacuum tube technology: upgrade to solid state
studied in 1994
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 15
Imaging (1)
Imaging services (not addressed during the SSA Preparatory Programme)
Imaging of objects in Earth-bound orbits (LEO, MEO, GEO, HEO ) Provision of information about the state of man-made space objects Provision of information about the state (deployment, pointing , …) of satellite appendages Provision of information for the visualization and identification of space objects
Imaging can be performed by means of radars or telescopes
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 16
Imaging (2)
Radar image of Envisat (2005)
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 17
Imaging (3)
2007-Jun-19ISS range: 350 km0.64 m f9.6 Ritchey-ChretienPicture taken in Boston, US
Optical image of the ISS (2007)
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 18
What is Space Weather about? Effects of the sun, of the solar wind, solar flares, status of magnetosphere, ionosphere and thermosphere, cosmic radiation effects
Space Weather services
Spacecraft and payload operations’ radiation protection. Thermosphere modelling for spacecraft drag calculation Launcher radiation protection for operations Space environment modelling for spacecraft design Human space flight radiation protection Ionospheric interference for navigation satellite signals Space environment modelling for SSA survey and tracking
A significant amount of activities have been performed at ESTEC (lead E.Daly, R.Marsden, A.Hilgers, A.Glover) and at ESOC (lead A.Donati, F. di Marco and other staff from OPS-HS)
Space Weather (1)
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 19
Space Weather (2)
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 20
Space Weather (3) – Source A.Donati/F. di Marco
Affected by LocalSpace Environment
Affected by LocalSpace Environment
Affected byIonospheric Disturbances
Affected byIonospheric Disturbances
Affected byGeomag. Induced Currents
Affected byGeomag. Induced Currents
Affected by LocalSpace Environment
Affected by LocalSpace Environment
Affected byIonospheric Disturbances
Affected byIonospheric Disturbances
Air Transport ServicesAir Transport Services
Affected byGeomag. Induced Currents
Affected byGeomag. Induced Currents
Spacecraft Operations ServicesSpacecraft Operations Services
Launcher SupportLauncher Support
Human Spaceflight SupportHuman Spaceflight Support
Science Missions Operations ServicesScience Missions Operations Services
Navigation ServicesNavigation Services
Communications ServicesCommunications Services
Power Industry ServicesPower Industry Services
Survey, Oil & Gas ServicesSurvey, Oil & Gas Services
Spacecraft DevelopmentSpacecraft Development
Air Transport ServicesAir Transport Services
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 21
Space Weather – SEISOP high level view (3)(Space Environment System for s/c Operations)
Source: A.Donati
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 22
Space Weather resources (4)
NASA ACE
NOAA GOES
Ground Based Magnetometers
NASA/POLAR
ESA/NASA SOHO
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
184.35 184.4 184.45 184.5 184.55 184.6
mep0e1
mep0e2
mep0e3
Event
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
184.35 184.4 184.45 184.5 184.55 184.6
mep0e1
mep0e2
mep0e3
Event
NOAA/SEM
L1
ESA Radiation MonitorsAurora
GNSS Scintillation Network (CLS)
Ionospheric monitoring (GPS TEC)
Cre
dit
: E
. Dal
y (E
SA
TE
C-E
ES
)
The Space Weather resources will have to be augmented byEuropean sensors and existing Centres (e.g G, B, F, N)
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 23
Space Weather activities (5)
SEIS/SEISOP pilot projects, used at European Space Operations Centre since 2005.
Combination of data-provider of space weather services
Demonstrating the quantitative benefits of space weather services
These services could pre-figure what will be the Space Weather precursor operational services at the end of the preparatory phase of SSA (2011).
SWENET Project at ESTEC
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 24
What are the NEOs ? These are asteroids and comets that represent a risk of collision with the Earth. (Earth’s orbit crossing at a distance < 45 Millions KM)
Services in the domain of Near Earth Objects (NEOs) Detection and tracking of all NEOs above a given size or risk threshold Determination of the orbit state Identification and ranking of NEO collision risks with the Earth (e.g. Tunguska (Siberia), 1908) Production of warnings about potential NEO impacts Provision of liaison between observers, data analyzers and politicians Study of possible mitigation measures
Near Earth Objects (1)
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 25
Near Earth Objects population (2)
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 26
Near Earth Objects population (3)
The rate of discovery of NEOs (asteroids) in the last 10 years has been impressiveThese were mainly the result of the work carried out at the Minor Planet Center (USA)
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 27
Near Earth Objects Effect of an impact with an asteroid (4)
• The impact of an asteroid on the Earth at a speed between 15 and 30 Km/s has a devastating effect due to the release of an enormous kinetic energy:blast waves, tsunamis, atmospheric and electromagnetic changes
• The amount of energy released can be significantly higher than generated by the most powerful nuclear bombs, and will depend on the size of the asteroid colliding with the Earth.
NEO diameter MT* Average interval
75 m 10 to 100 1,000 years
350 m 1,000 to 10,000
16,000 years
3 Km 1,000,000 to 10,000,000
1,000,000 years
• * MT: Explosive power of 1 Mega Tonne of TNT• The Hiroshima bomb had an explosive power of 15 KT
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 28
Near Earth ObjectsTunguska event in Siberia (5)
• The 1908 explosion in Siberia was most likely caused by the air burst of a large meteoroid or comet fragment at an altitude of 5 – 10 Km above the Earth.
• The size of the object has been estimated at 50 – 80 m
• Estimates of the energy of the blast are in the order of 10 – 15 MT, which is 1000 times the energy released by the Hiroshima nuclear bomb !
• An area of ca. 2000 sq. Km has been destroyed by this explosion.
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 29
Security aspects affecting the SSA Programme
Some of the elements of the Programme will be subject to restrictions and security regulations due to their potential political sensitivity.
This concerns mainly the core element for the Space Surveillance activity, as well as the corresponding Data Centres entrusted with the tasks of collecting and distributing data and providing the related services.
The element related to Space Weather and NEOs activities is not so sensitive and no specific restrictions in the handling of the collected data is anticipated.
During the execution of the Programme, the security aspects of the Programme will be coordinated through a unit in charge of Governance and Data policy aspects, under guidance of an internal ESA Steering Board.
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 30
Breakdown of the SSA Preparatory Programme in independent elements
The Delegations requested the SSA preparatory Programme to cover 3 years (2009 – 2011), and be split in four elements:
a) Core element (Governance, Data Policy, Data Security, SSA general architecture, Space Surveillance precursor services)
b) Space Weather element (including some NEOs activities)
c) Radar element (bread boarding of essential radar sub-systems), in close coordination with ESA’s technology Programmes such as the TRP and GSTP – Enabler of the core element
d) Pilot Data Centres element (prototyping of the required Data Centres). This is an enabler of the core and Space Weather elements.
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 31
Financial envelopes of the four SSA elements
All participating States will have to subscribe to the core element to a level of at least 0.25 GNP.
The participation to the other elements is optional
The core element has a fixed envelope of 20 MEUR
The other elements have their envelope tentatively fixed at the following levels:- Space Weather element: 11 MEUR- Radar element: 11 MEUR- Pilot Data Centres element: 13 MEUR
This brings the value of the SSA preparatory Programme to an estimated amount of 55 MEUR (Actual subscription ca. 50 MEUR)
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 32
The SSA-Period 2 Programme will continue activities related to the SSA domains, with the main focus on the consolidation of the ground-based infrastructure and deployment of a space-based infrastructure:
Finalisation of the development and further deployments of the ground-based Facilities deployed under SSA-Period I
Enhancement of precursor operational services to fully-fledged operational services Development and Launch of an initial space-based infrastructure. This could include the deployment of satellites at various Earth-bound orbits with instruments dedicated to survey & tracking and space weather. The definition and subsequent deployment of a satellite at Lagrange point L1 could as well be initiated during the period 2, for the fulfilment of services related to Space Weather applications currently provided by the SOHO mission.
SSA-Period 2 activities
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 33
Internal Project Framework (1)
The responsibility for the SSA preparatory Programme has been entrusted to D/OPS.
The mandate given to ESA by the participating States encompasses the responsibility for the development of the European SSA System, as well as for the delivery of precursor pre-operational services in all the SSA domains.
At the same time, contacts will be pursued during the period 1 with the EU (EC, EDA, EUSC) for the definition of a suitable governance scheme applicable to the European SSA System during its operational phase, as well as for the identification of the adequate organization that will eventually take control of the SSA system operations.
A Data Policy for the handling of the SSA data will be elaborated together with the participating States.
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 34
Internal Project Framework (2)
During the execution of the preparatory Programme, overall responsibility will be assigned to a Core Team. Specific tasks such as governance and data policy, Ground and Space Segment Management will also be performed by staff in the core team.
Support tasks will be largely provided by staff from D/TEC and D/OPS, and to a smaller extent by staff from DG-P (Governance, relations with the EU), D/SRE (Space Weather and NEOs), and D/EOP (Space Weather)
Staff in the core team will be from D/OPS, or integrated into D/OPS for the duration of the SSA Programme.
Staff in the support team will provide functional support to the SSA Programme
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 35
SSA Project organization (1)
Estimated manpower requirements
The manpower required to cover all the SSA activities during the preparatory phase (2009 – 2011) are estimated at a level of 10 my/y.
This includes the manpower both in the core team and in the support team
In the core team, the manpower has to be provided by permanent staff, with management responsibilities. The manpower level of D/OPS and staff from other directorates integrated in the Project Team can be estimated at a level of 5 my/y
In the support team, the manpower can be provided by both expert permanent and contract staff. The support level can be estimated at a level of 5 my/y.
OPS-G Forum 5th December 2008, Page 36
SSA Project organization (2)Core team during the preparatory phase
SSAProgramme
Manager
SSAProgramme
Manager
SSANEO
Systems Manager
SSANEO
Systems Manager
SSASurveillance and
Tracking Systems Manager
SSASurveillance and
Tracking Systems Manager
SSAImaging Systems Manager
SSAImaging Systems Manager
SSASpace Weather
Systems Manager
SSASpace Weather
Systems Manager
SSA GovernanceData Policy
Int. and EU Rel. I/F with the PB-SSA
SSA GovernanceData Policy
Int. and EU Rel. I/F with the PB-SSA
SSA Business
OperationsProject Control
SSA Business
OperationsProject Control
SSAGround
Segment Manager
SSAGround
Segment Manager
SSASpace
Segment Manager
SSASpace
Segment Manager
D/OPS
SSASteeringGroup
SSAUser’sGroup Management
Services
Procurement
Posts planned to be opened during the SSA Preparatory
Programme