![Page 1: Oregon's Framework for Teacher Evaluation What do North Clackamas teachers and administrators need to know?](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649ca35503460f949637bb/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Oregon's Framework for Teacher Evaluation
What do North Clackamas teachers and administrators need to know?
![Page 2: Oregon's Framework for Teacher Evaluation What do North Clackamas teachers and administrators need to know?](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649ca35503460f949637bb/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
SB 290 Design Committee
• John Beight- HR
• Alyson Brant- ACMS
• Christine Garcia- CHS
• Rob Holloway- SSS
• Jodi Lee- Duncan
• Jason McCammon- SSC
• Mark Pinder- MHS
• Shelly Reggiani- ELL
• Robin Troche- MHS and NCEA
• Sylvia Biggs- RCMS
• Doug Bridge- Whitcomb
• Rachael Hall- Sunnyside
• Cam Kitchen- Mt. Scott
• Marty Lefkowitz- CHS
• Jenna Miller- HVMS
• Mike Potter- View Acres
• Aeylin Summers- DO
• Erin Whitlock- OEA
![Page 3: Oregon's Framework for Teacher Evaluation What do North Clackamas teachers and administrators need to know?](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649ca35503460f949637bb/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
A Brief History Lesson
How did we come to do this work? Why now?
![Page 4: Oregon's Framework for Teacher Evaluation What do North Clackamas teachers and administrators need to know?](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649ca35503460f949637bb/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Oregon's Waiver and Teacher EvaluationElementary Secondary Education Act (ESEA) waiver to get out of Adequate
Yearly Progress (AYP) requirements needed certain assurances:
• Senate Bill 290 (2011)
- Evaluation systems collaboratively designed with teachers and exclusive bargaining representative
- Aligned to model core teaching standards
- Multiple-measures to determine proficiencies
• ESEA-No Child Left Behind Waiver (2012)
- Consensus evaluation framework
- Student growth as a “significant factor”
- 2012-2013 development of a model within the framework for each district
![Page 5: Oregon's Framework for Teacher Evaluation What do North Clackamas teachers and administrators need to know?](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649ca35503460f949637bb/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
SB 290 Requirements
Teacher and administrator evaluations systems must:• Provide examples of multiple measures;
• Use four performance levels of effectiveness;
• Have student learning as a significant consideration in the evaluation;
• Evaluate teachers and administrators on a regular cycle;
• Have district superintendents report regularly to local boards on their evaluation systems and educator effectiveness.
![Page 6: Oregon's Framework for Teacher Evaluation What do North Clackamas teachers and administrators need to know?](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649ca35503460f949637bb/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Oregon's Waiver and Teacher Evaluation
ESEA-No Child Left Behind Waiver:
• Every teacher evaluation in Oregon must include multiple, valid measures tied to established standards of teaching.
• Prohibits evaluations based solely on standardized tests. Requires multiple, valid measures of student learning when student growth is considered in an evaluation.
• Requires districts to provide teachers the opportunity to set their own student learning goals.
• Local association and district determine measures in evaluation system consistent with SB 290.
• Oregon’s Waiver does not require school districts to set an arbitrary percentage weight for student growth in individual teacher evaluations.
![Page 7: Oregon's Framework for Teacher Evaluation What do North Clackamas teachers and administrators need to know?](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649ca35503460f949637bb/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Oregon's Framework Required Elements
All district teacher and administrator evaluation and support systems must include the following five elements:
1 2 3 4 5
Standards of Professional
Practice
Differentiated Performance
Levels
(4 levels)
Multiple Measures
Evaluation and Professional
Growth Cycle
Aligned Professional
Learning
![Page 8: Oregon's Framework for Teacher Evaluation What do North Clackamas teachers and administrators need to know?](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649ca35503460f949637bb/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
1) Standards of Professional Practice
Adopted Model Core Teaching Standards and Educational Leadership/Administrator Standards
• Interstate Teacher Assessment & Support Consortium (InTASC)
• Four Domains:
1- The Learner and Learning
2- Content
3- Instructional Practice
4- Professional Responsibility
![Page 9: Oregon's Framework for Teacher Evaluation What do North Clackamas teachers and administrators need to know?](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649ca35503460f949637bb/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
2) Differentiated Performance Levels
Teacher and administrator performance assessed on the Standards of Professional Practice on four levels:
Level 1 – Does not meet standards
Level 2 – Making progress toward standards
Level 3 – Meets standards
Level 4 – Exceeds standards
• Rubrics describe performance at each level for each standard.
• Rubrics guide individuals toward improving their practice at the next performance level
• District team has selected the Danielson rubric for our model.
![Page 10: Oregon's Framework for Teacher Evaluation What do North Clackamas teachers and administrators need to know?](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649ca35503460f949637bb/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
3) Multiple Measures
Oregon teacher evaluations must include measures from three categories of evidence:
Aligned to the standards of professional practice
![Page 11: Oregon's Framework for Teacher Evaluation What do North Clackamas teachers and administrators need to know?](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649ca35503460f949637bb/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
(A) Professional Practice – Teachers: Evidence of effectiveness of planning,
delivery of instruction, and assessment of student learning
(B) Professional Responsibilities– Teachers: Evidence of teachers’ progress toward
their own professional goals and contribution to schoolwide goals, including collegial learning
3) Multiple Measures
![Page 12: Oregon's Framework for Teacher Evaluation What do North Clackamas teachers and administrators need to know?](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649ca35503460f949637bb/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
3) Multiple Measures
C) Student Learning and Growth
• “Student growth” defined as “the change in student achievement between two or more points in time.”
• “Significant” means student growth must play a meaningful role in evaluations.
• Teachers, in collaboration with their supervisors/ evaluators, will establish student growth goals and select evidence from a variety of valid measures and regularly assess progress.
• Pilots will help determine the definition of “significant.”
![Page 13: Oregon's Framework for Teacher Evaluation What do North Clackamas teachers and administrators need to know?](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649ca35503460f949637bb/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Category Types of Measures of Student Learning (aligned to standards)
Examples include, but are not limited to:
1 State or national standardized tests
Oregon Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (OAKS), SMARTER Balanced (when adopted), English Language Proficiency Assessment (ELPA), Extended Assessments
2 Common national, international, regional, district-developed measures
ACT, PLAN, EXPLORE, AP, IB, DIBELS, C-PAS, other national measures; or common assessments approved by the district or state as valid, reliable and able to be scored comparably across schools or classrooms
3 Classroom-based or school-wide measures
Student performances, portfolios, products, projects, work samples, tests
Measures of student learning and growth include three types of measures:
3) Multiple Measures
![Page 14: Oregon's Framework for Teacher Evaluation What do North Clackamas teachers and administrators need to know?](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649ca35503460f949637bb/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
• Multiple measures of student growth allows for inclusion of all educators not just in state tested areas (e.g. the arts, music, CTE, ELL, special education).
• All teachers held to the same standards, i.e., Model Core Teaching Standards.
• Evaluation processes/tools differentiated to accommodate the unique skills and responsibilities for teachers of students with disabilities and English Learners.
3) Multiple Measures
![Page 15: Oregon's Framework for Teacher Evaluation What do North Clackamas teachers and administrators need to know?](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649ca35503460f949637bb/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Critical steps in the cycle
Collaborative process, ongoing
feedback, focus on
improving effectiveness
4) Evaluation and Professional Growth Cycle
![Page 16: Oregon's Framework for Teacher Evaluation What do North Clackamas teachers and administrators need to know?](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649ca35503460f949637bb/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
• Frequency of Evaluations– Probationary teachers – every year– Contract teachers – at least every two years– Probationary administrators – every year– Administrators – at least every two years
4) Evaluation and Professional Growth Cycle
![Page 17: Oregon's Framework for Teacher Evaluation What do North Clackamas teachers and administrators need to know?](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649ca35503460f949637bb/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
5) Aligned Professional Development
• Goal is to improve professional practice.
• Evaluations inform educators of strengths and weaknesses.
• System will support informed decisions for professional growth.
• Professional learning must be relevant to the educator's goals and needs.
![Page 18: Oregon's Framework for Teacher Evaluation What do North Clackamas teachers and administrators need to know?](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649ca35503460f949637bb/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Timelines• Our district is partnered with OEA and ODE to pilot the
“multiple measures” component of the system from mid-February to mid-May.
• We must submit our assurances to the state for both the certified and administrative systems by June, 2013.
• In the 2013-2014 SY, we will be evaluated according to these new systems.
• We will be “held harmless” for the student achievement part for the year.
• We can still make changes next year as we work the system.
![Page 19: Oregon's Framework for Teacher Evaluation What do North Clackamas teachers and administrators need to know?](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649ca35503460f949637bb/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
The new systems are Not about:
• Merit pay,
• Reducing any staff member to a score,
• Making staff members fearful,
• Pitting staff members or whole schools against each other.
![Page 20: Oregon's Framework for Teacher Evaluation What do North Clackamas teachers and administrators need to know?](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649ca35503460f949637bb/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
The new system is about:
• Aligning the system to support staff in teaching and supporting the growth and achievement of all students.
• Supporting staff members in the complex work of teaching and learning.
• Supporting staff in taking risks to help the students who need the most help.
• Helping everyone get what they need to grow: certified staff, administrators and kids.
![Page 21: Oregon's Framework for Teacher Evaluation What do North Clackamas teachers and administrators need to know?](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649ca35503460f949637bb/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Questions?
Questions will be tracked, answered and posted on a special section of the website, so
all staff can access shared information.