153
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
OVERCOMING OBJECTIONS TO SWEDENBORG’SWRITINGS THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT OFSCIENTIFIC DUALISM†
Leon James*
ContentsIntroductionScientific RevelationsSpiritual RevelationsHow Swedenborg Has Been PortrayedEvaluating SwedenborgResistance to SwedenborgIs Swedenborg’s Dualism Scientific?The Six Minimal Premises of Dualist Science
1. The existence of the dual sun2. The existence of vertical degrees3. The existence of influx4. The existence of vertical community5. No function without substance or the dualist methodology6. All phenomena are human
Extracting Dualist Concepts From Swedenborg’s WritingsIt is Not Known RevealedScientific Puzzles For Dualist ScienceConclusionReferencesRelated Articles
† Copyright © 1998 Leon James* Dr. Leon James is Professor of Psychology at the University of Hawaii. His research and
publications since 1960 have been in the area of behaviorism, psycholinguistics, drivingpsychology, and language learning. Finding Swedenborg’s theological works in 1980, he hassince then been integrating ideas from them into the science of psychology, developing newconcepts in doing so. Articles on his research are accessible at: www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy/leon.html. He welcomes email at: [email protected]. Mailing address: 744Pahumele Place, Kailua, HI 96734.
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
154
INTRODUCTION
The Writings of Swedenborg (1688–1771) have elicited a variety ofreactions over the centuries, ranging from making them a basis of a
new Christian revelation to considering them the grandiose output of amere madman and mystic. Recently, Talbot (1997) revisited the long liter-ary history of Swedenborg’s alleged insanity, a charge which understand-ably has offended many New Church intellectuals.1 The logic andarguments of the Swedenborgian supporters (see Larsen, 1988; Williams-Hogan, 1988) appear far superior, more detailed, and weightier than themeager, insufficient, and contentious speculations of the Swedenborgdetractors.
The latest of these insanity charges, which Talbot fully and defini-tively demonstrates to be unfounded and untenable, is a brief note by JohnJohnson in the British Journal of Psychiatry (1994) in which he concludes onthe basis of psychohistorical methods (“psychopathography”) thatSwedenborg’s spiritual experiences were “hallucinations” of “acute schizo-phrenia or epileptic psychosis.” Similar charges by other psychiatrists arereferred to (for example, Maudsley) held together by the unifying ideathat Swedenborg had “the conviction that he was the Messiah and theSecond Advent of the Lord Jesus Christ.” As Talbot points out, this chargeis clearly inaccurate to anyone who reads Swedenborg’s writings.Swedenborg never claimed to be the Messiah but rather to worship theMessiah as God-Man and to announce to the world the good news of theMessiah’s Second Advent for which he was a witness and revelator inresponse to a special and unique Divine calling. He always insisted that itwas not he, Swedenborg, who was holy or special or infallible, but hisgiven mission, and that people should test the ideas in his writings by theirown common sense and rational thinking. He always insisted that peopleshould not believe anything except what their common sense and rea-soned thought convince them to be the truth. Thus he always presents the
1 The article was reprinted in the January–June, 1998, issue of The New Philosophy (vol. CI,nos. 1 & 2) which was devoted to the so-called madness hypothesis in reference to Swedenborg.This 220-page issue consists of nine articles, both original and reprinted, on a range of topics,and is recommended reading for anyone interested in examining in depth the subject ofSwedenborg’s state of mind.
155
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
ideas in the writings as one would present scientific or legal issues in acourt of law or legislative body, thus, from a rational perspective with arational method, and following a rational sequence. The purpose is alwaysto prove logically and common sensically and by analogy, avoiding blindacceptance or persuasion as one ought to avoid the plague.
Perhaps to many psychiatrists it makes no difference whetherSwedenborg thought he was the Messiah or whether he thought he wasmerely announcing the Messiah’s Second Coming, with himself as theonly earthly witness to it. In both cases modern psychiatry would almostcompulsively assign a diagnosis of psychosis. Strengthening this diagno-sis, psychiatrists would point to facts acknowledged and commonly ac-cepted by Swedenborgians, such as the following:
• Swedenborg kept a diary of his daily conversations with “spirits” whoare inhabitants of the spiritual world after their death in this world.
• Jesus Christ personally appeared to him in a vision on more than on oneoccasion and directly instructed Swedenborg to write about his experi-ences with spirits and their relation to the Bible, and to call these writingsSacred Revelations, the Second Coming of Christ, as a means of effecting anew Christian dispensation for the entire future to come.
• As part of this New Christian revelation Swedenborg presents his seriesof experiences in the spiritual world including the direct communicationwith spirits who had been born on various planets inside and outside thesolar system, and even some episodes that involved actually “seeingthrough the eyes” of living inhabitants on distant planets, through themediation of spirits.
• Also as part of this new revelation, Swedenborg includes his extensiveconversations with “angels” who are the inhabitants of celestial regionsafter their departure from planetary life, and who shared with him theirknowledge and wisdom about human behavior, about life on planets,about human anatomy, morality, religion, and God.
• Swedenborg reports conversations with well-known historical figuressuch as Moses, David, Mary, Aristotle, Luther, Newton, as well as contem-
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
156
poraries who had just departed including a Swedish king and other ac-quaintances and family members. In these conversations, Swedenborgreveals new facts about these people, not known from history, such asNewton’s recantation and rejection of his concept of vacuum (see below),an idea Swedenborg abhors as irrational. Another: his conversations withLuther (SD 5103) who confesses that an angel appeared to him at thebeginning of his attempts to effect a religious schism in Catholic Christian-ity, warning Luther not to continue pushing his idea that “faith alonesaves, not works” because it is a false idea and harmful. But Luther did itanyway because he saw no other way of solidifying the Protestant schism,and then he confessed his regretfulness to Swedenborg.
• Swedenborg’s description of the afterlife, or “the spiritual world,” isuniversalized in absolute terms. He offered his extensive writings of morethan two dozen volumes, self-published in Neo-Latin at his own expense,as the very Word of God, equal to the Bible, describing himself and hiswork as “the greatest miracle ever granted by the Lord” in the history ofhumankind.
• Swedenborg’s writings cover both spiritual and natural or scientificrevelations.
SCIENTIFIC REVELATIONS
These include:
• Cosmology, or the origin of the universe, through the “two suns” andtheir intervening atmospheres, and the methods of its current mainte-nance by the Laws of Divine Providence and Permissions—see Divine Loveand Wisdom and Divine Providence. Also: the character of evolution ofcivilizations on planets, such as the fact that our planet is the only oneamong numerous other inhabited planets that have a mechanized orindustrialized society.
• Medical science, including the characteristic functions and origins ofsome viruses not yet identified in his lifetime—Spiritual Experiences, andBlom-Dahl (1996).
157
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
• The nature of psychosomatic operations, such as the observation that“anxieties about the future affect the stomach more than the rest of theviscera” (AC 5178).
• The anatomy of brain structures too small to identify with the micro-scope (see Economy of the Animal Kingdom, and Psychological Transactions(1743).
• The lack of sensation and thought in the fetus (DLW 405).
• Anthropology and archeology, including many unknown facts aboutancient peoples, sacred scriptures, culture, religion, life-span, death ritu-als, symbols, hieroglyphics, science of correspondences, the nature ofunconscious motivation in human affairs, and still others—see ArcanaCoelestia throughout.
• Psychology and neurophysiology, especially the detailed working of themind/body interaction, including the unobservable elements and compo-nents of brain cells, their respiration, and their initiation of activity throughthe will and the understanding. Also, the relation between the cerebellumand the affective domain, on the one hand, and on the other, the relationbetween the cerebral cortex and the cognitive domain. Also included, aremany psychological revelations about relationships, marriage, and life’sdevelopmental phases, including language, thought, memory, and rea-soning—see Divine Love and Wisdom, Conjugial Love, and True ChristianReligion.
• Physics and chemistry, such as the impossibility of a vacuum (seebelow), or the description of the inner structure of objects in terms of threedegrees of discontinuity analogous to the universal law that applies with-out exception to every single phenomenon, object, process, or functionalquality:
I) its essence, origin, source, purpose, or first endII) its form, cause, structure, or compositionIII) its effect, resultant, outcome, or usability.
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
158
By way of illustration, we find the following from Conjugial Love 329:
After the Chief Teacher and the rest had left me, some boys who also had
been in the gymnastic sport followed me home and there, for a time,
stood by me while I was writing. And lo, they saw a cockroach running
over my paper and asked in surprise, “What is that little creature which
runs so fast?” I said, “It is called a cockroach, and I will tell you marvels
about it.” I then said: “In that living creature, small as it is, there are as
many members and viscera as in a camel. It has brains, hearts, pulmonary
tubes, organs of sense, of motion, and of generation, a stomach, intestines,
and many other things; and each of them is a contexture of fiber, nerves,
blood-vessels, muscles, tendons, membranes; and each of these a contex-
ture of things still purer which lie deeply hidden beyond the reach of any
eye.”
[2] The boys then said that to them this little living thing seemed
nothing more than a simple substance. To this I said: “Nevertheless, there
are innumerable things within it. I tell you this, that you may know that it
is the same in every object which appears before you as a one, a simple, a
mite. It is the same also in your actions, affections, and thoughts. I can
assure you that every grain of your thought, and every drop of your
affection is divisible to infinity, and that so far as your ideas are divisible
you are wise. Know then, that everything divided is more and more
multiple, and not more and more simple; for when divided again and
again, it approaches nearer and nearer to the infinite in which are all
things infinitely. This that I tell you is something new and never before
heard of.”
[3] After I had said this, the boys went from me to the Chief Teacher
and asked him if, in the gymnasium, he would at some time propose as a
problem something new and unheard of. He asked, “What?” They said:
“That everything divided is more and more multiple and not more and
more simple, because it approaches nearer and nearer to the Infinite in
which are all things infinitely.” He promised to propose it, and said: “I
see this because I have perceived that a single natural idea is the containant
of innumerable spiritual ideas; yea, that a single spiritual idea is the
containant of innumerable celestial ideas. Hence the distinction between
159
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
celestial wisdom, in which are the angels of the third heaven, and spiri-
tual wisdom in which are the angels of the second heaven; and also
between [the latter and] natural wisdom in which are the angels of the
ultimate heaven and also men.”
Every object in the natural world, whether planet or gene, existswithin these three discontinuous but related planes of existence. This isindeed a major new scientific revelation which could not be discoveredmerely through observational data, as was also the case with gravity,quantum, the speed of light, and hypothetical or posited particles, all ofwhich were arrived at through calculations and inferences, not directobservation. The new revelation that the cause of an event in “successivedegrees” is still “within” the effect in “simultaneous degrees” opens a newera in science, preparing the way for the future dualism. As Swedenborgpointed out, one of the implications of this shift in paradigm is that most ofwhat scientists today call cause-effect relations are actually effect-effectcorrelations.
To give but one illustration: the cause of the car speeding up is not thegreater rate of fuel combustion, these two being merely correlations ofeffects; instead, the cause of the car going faster is the driver’s intention ofgoing faster. These three are not in a continuous relation: the driver’sintention is in a different plane of the universe than the mechanically built-in relation between gas pedal and combustion engine. In the new para-digm of dualist science, these events, which today are considered separatelyby physics and psychology, will be integrated into a dualist theory ofevents that integrates human intentions or functions with physical proper-ties of phenomena. Swedenborg’s dualist science is anthropomorphic, asindicated by these additional scientific revelations:
• The shape of the universe is not spherical but humanoid, as visuallywitnessed by Swedenborg when, by Divine Providence, he was taken toan outside position to look at it.
• The universe contains two suns, that in the spiritual world forming andgenerating all those in the natural world on a successive basis; further,
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
160
after generating them, remaining “within” them on a simultaneous basis,and directing them from that position continuously, synchronously, andceaselessly.
• Events in the natural universe are totally constricted within limits im-posed by events in the spiritual world, the latter being “within” the formeras cause is “within” effect in simultaneous degrees of existence.
• Randomness (or chance) and evolutionary patterns such as selection andadaptation, are in reality nonrandom but totally determined by humanoidpurposes involving love, good, value, wisdom, morality, truth, justice,usefulness, and their opposites or corruptions. For instance, the varietyand evolution of animal forms parallel and are constrained by the varietyand hierarchical structure of human affections, emotions, and sentiments.Every species and genus, every homological structure, every biochemicalprocess is constrained by and parallels exactly the taxonomy of the humanmind—its affections, thoughts, and sensations built up into selves withincultures through personality and society. Nature is a theater of the spiri-tual: Swedenborg gives this principle a scientific basis.
SPIRITUAL REVELATIONS
These include:
• the inner structure of the Trinity as three aspects of the one DivinePerson known variously as Father, Jehovah, Jesus, Messiah-God
• the developmental phases of the Divine dispensations over history, orthe history of churches from the beginning of time to the unending future
• the spiritual meaning of the Bible and the method of correspondences bywhich this meaning can be extracted, formed into Doctrine that thenserves as the basis of one’s regeneration (or preparation for heavenly life)
• the nature of one’s life in heaven or eternity, and in hell, revealed in greatdetail through his journeys and conversations in the spiritual world
161
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
• the methods of regeneration we must follow in order to prepare forheavenly life, how we must live our daily lives in orderly obedience toGod through religion and conscience. Thus we choose heavenly or hellish lifein eternity by our cumulative choices which form our permanent innercharacter as a spirit.
HOW SWEDENBORG HAS BEEN PORTRAYED
It is obvious from this brief listing that Swedenborg represents aunique case in the history of writers and that no one has ever come forth toclaim what he has claimed and achieved as a scientist and revelator. Theseamazing claims and treatises would have been totally ignored by Europe’s18th- and 19th-century intelligentsia had they not had solid, incontrovert-ible internal merit. Here is a partial list of European and American writerswho have publicly acknowledged their admiration of Swedenborg’s writ-ings not as a madman’s psychosis, but as intellectually valuable, convinc-ing, and unique: John Bigelow, William Blake, Robert and Elisabeth BarrettBrowning, Thomas Carlyle, Andrew Carnegie, Samuel Coleridge, RalphEmerson, Benjamin Franklin, Robert Frost, Henry James, the Elder, CarlJung, Immanuel Kant, Helen Keller, Czeslaw Milosz, James Moffat, JohnOberlin, Ezra Pound, Sundar Singh, August Strindberg, Daisetz Suzuki,Henry Thoreau, Alfred R. Wallace, John Wesley, Colin Wilson. (SwedenborgFoundation, 1984)
Not all of these contacts with Swedenborgian thinking were entirelypositive (Brock et al., 1988). Although William James edited his father’spapers on Swedenborg for posthumous publication, only two or threepassing references to Swedenborgianism occur in William James’ ownworks (Taylor, 1997). Contemporary study of Swedenborg’s thought iscarried out by a small active following that, generation after generation,continues to publish his works and produce updated translations andcollateral interpretations (see also Brock et. al., 1988). As Jane Williams-Hogan points out, Swedenborg did not have a personal following like allthe other “mystics” who founded new religious groups in the past twocenturies. His Writings constitute a written revelation and are character-ized by the intellectual requirements of such a cultural-religious instru-
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
162
ment which she calls “a new form of charisma with its own structure ororder and its own pattern of development”:
Charisma must meet us where we are and speak to who we are. In
traditional societies, charisma is located in shamans and prophets; in
modern societies, I theorize that it appears in text. What to us is extraordi-
nary can be appreciated and responded to when presented in the rational
form of the charismatic book.
Rational and critical people must be addressed in rational and criti-
cal forms. They need to explore in freedom. That critical intellectual
freedom into which we are socialized in this age is most satisfactorily
engaged when privately reading text. (Jane Williams-Hogan, 2)
Contemporary encyclopedias generally carry entries on Swedenborgand universally acknowledge his broad intellectual influence. An authori-tative catalogue of Swedenborg’s writings lists over 200 titles (Tafel, 1875)and the current complete set of Swedenborg’s works in English contains57 volumes (Swedenborg Foundation). Most public and academic librariesin the U.S. appear to have one or more books by Swedenborg. In a wellknown biography of Swedenborg and his writings, Trobridge ends hisdiscussion on “spiritual philosophy” with this conclusion:
The principles that Swedenborg has elucidated have a very wide bearing;
they are applicable, indeed, to all the great subjects that have exercised
the human mind from time immemorial. A new light is thrown upon all
of these problems and a new order is brought into the region of philo-
sophic inquiry. (Trobridge, 1976, 134 )
The entry on Swedenborg in The New Encyclopedia Britannica (1993)describes him as a “Swedish scientist, Christian mystic, philosopher, andtheologian who wrote voluminously in interpreting the Scriptures as theimmediate word of God.” Swedenborg is described as a precursor of keymodern concepts involving the structure of the atom, the formation ofplanets, the nebular theory, and the localization of mental processes in theright and left hemispheres of the brain. The Encyclopedia of Philosophy(1967) describes Swedenborg as a “scientist, Biblical scholar, and mystic”
163
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
and ties him to rationalists like Descartes, Leibniz, Christian Wolff,Malebranche, and empiricists like Locke. In the classical vein, Swedenborgis dubbed both Aristotelian and Neoplatonic. There is no entry forSwedenborg in the International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (1968)and in the Encyclopedia Judaica (1973).
The Encyclopedia of Religion (1987) qualifies Swedenborg as “Swedishscientist and mystic” who “reported on what he had heard and seen in hissupernatural experiences.” It mentions Swedenborg’s doctrine of corre-spondences which was referred to as “a vision of the truth hidden by theconfusion of sense data and everyday language” by “many of the greatestpoets of Western literature, particularly in the Romantic and Symbolictraditions.” The most extensive entry on Swedenborg was found in TheNew Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge (1957). This compre-hensive article covers Swedenborg’s call to his mission as revelator, hissubsequent intromission into the spiritual world while continuing hisprofessional duties as a government mining engineer and legislator, aswell as Kant’s concealment of his indebtedness to Swedenborg’s ideas.The article also discusses the sequence and content of Swedenborg’s majorworks. In contrast to this sympathetic coverage, the New Catholic Encyclo-pedia (1967) ends its brief article on Swedenborg with the suggestion that“his visions were manifestations of a mental disease (paranoia), subcon-sciously developed to confirm the theories that he had already workedout.” Still, there is the recognition that “his influence, however, has beenconsiderable, affecting particularly the philosophy and literature of theRomanticists, and the development of the psychical sciences.” An exten-sive bibliography of Swedenborg’s writings will be found in Brock et. al.,1988.
The great paradox of Swedenborg is that his writings have had suchan enduring and deep influence on American and Western thought, andyet he is not directly cited in the professional literature of science, theol-ogy, philosophy, and psychology (Taylor, 1997), despite the fact that well-known mainstream psychologists like William James (through his father,Henry James, Sr.), Gordon Allport, and Henry Murray, were deeply in-volved with Swedenborg according to Taylor. There undoubtedly exists areluctance on the part of writers to cite Swedenborg openly. Kirven (1988)and Zwink (1988) have examined the reasons why Kant, Goethe, Schelling,
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
164
and writers in the 19th century German Southwest, have avoided directcitations to Swedenborg in their published works, though they have ac-knowledged his influence in indirect allusions and in private letters orcomments to friends.
Famed Zen master Daisetz Suzuki (1996), who translated some ofSwedenborg’s books into Japanese, attributes Swedenborg’s obscurity tothe fact that he provides too many details about what he has ‘seen andheard’ in heaven and hell (cited in Nagashima, 1993). He felt thatSwedenborg’s theology would be more acceptable to the intelligentsia ifhe had provided fewer details about life in the afterlife. Famed transcen-dentalist and theologian Emerson chose Swedenborg as one of his Repre-sentative Men in science and history and was deeply influenced by thedescription of correspondences between natural phenomena in the physi-cal environment and spiritual phenomena in the mind. Despite this Emersoncould not get past the simplistic narrative descriptions Swedenborg had ofhis heavenly travels and conversations with angels. To Emerson’s desirefor more sophisticated conceptions of the spiritual, Swedenborg’s reportof childlike quality of angels’ wisdom and conceptions was ultimatelyunbelievable.
Contemporary scientists understandably hesitate to refer to a writerwho makes claims such as this, about the origin of his knowledge:
I sacredly attest that I have been intromitted into the Kingdom of God by
Messiah Himself, Jesus of Nazareth, and have there spoken with heav-
enly Genii, with Spirits, with the dead who have risen again, yea with
those who called themselves Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Esau, Rebecca, Moses,
Aaron, and the Apostles, especially Paul and James; and this now through
a period of eight months . . . (Adversaria 475, cited by Potts, Vol. VI, p. 114)
Years later, towards the end of his long career, Swedenborg states thathis intromission into dual life is the greatest miracle in human history andhas not been granted by God to anyone before. The Lord’s purpose for thisnew revelation is to bring on His long promised Second Advent, a processwhich is to be accomplished through and in the writings of Swedenborg,the appointed revelator. He writes:
165
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
As it has been granted me by the Lord to be in the Spiritual World and in
the natural world at the same time, and therefore to speak with Angels as
with men . . . for I have spoken with all my relations and friends, and
likewise with kings and dukes, as also with learned men, who have met
their fate; and this now continually for twenty-seven years, I am able to
describe from living experience the states of men after death . . . (TCR 281)
EVALUATING SWEDENBORG
Talbot (1995) starts with the question of how one knows whethersomeone is telling the truth or not. Specifically, how do you know that thisman Swedenborg was sane or truthful? So he masterfully elaborates thevarious logical steps we must consider, or conditions that must be met inorder for a reasonable person to conclude that Swedenborg was sane andtruthful. This argument had to be made, of course, in order to counteractthe psychiatric diagnosis of Swedenborg as just another case of a man whohas become insane, psychotic, delusional, or epileptic.
The most recent article, written by John Johnson and published in theBritish Journal of Psychiatry (1994) is barely two pages long and presents nobelievable evidence other than repeating some undocumented and highlydisputed hearsay claims made by one of Swedenborg’s landlords in Lon-don where he was lodging for awhile. The article makes no reference toSwedenborg’s contributions and achievements throughout his life anddoes not refer to any of the biographies of Swedenborg that discuss andrefute the delusion diagnosis. No one who knows anything aboutSwedenborg would give any serious attention to this type of historicalpsychiatric hype. Yet its publication in a respectable professional journal isof some significance and needs to be evaluated.
This type of global attack on Swedenborg through the insanity chargehas had a long history in Swedenborgian literature, as ably documented inTalbot’s rebuttal of Johnson’s gratuitous claims. So rather than ask, asTalbot already has, “How do you know that this man Swedenborg wassane or truthful?”, let me formulate another question, namely, “When dopeople ask how you know that this man Swedenborg was sane or truth-ful?” I will take up two conditions or motives that bring people to ask thisquestion. I encountered these motives in my own process of becoming a
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
166
Swedenborgian scientist in middle age, when my academic and scientificcareer as a psychologist and social scientist was at its peak.
At age 43 I had been a full professor for a decade and had garnered along list of publications and government research grants in my specialtyfield of psycholinguistics and cognitive science. That year (1981) I wasbrowsing one day in our University of Hawaii library in the BS and BXcategory looking for a Bible commentary we could take home (I was withmy wife). At one point we saw several shelves of books in one edition, allauthored by Emanuel Swedenborg. I recognized the name from a com-ment I had read in one of Rudolf Steiner’s magazine articles. All I couldremember was that Steiner called Swedenborg a mad genius and that Ihad made a mental note to look him up some day. I had not expected hisbooks to be in the Bible-exegesis category, but I was delighted at thedouble opportunity and took home my first Swedenborg volume of what Ilater came to know fondly as “the Writings.”
RESISTANCE TO SWEDENBORG
My wife and I spent hours every evening reading volume after vol-ume in this astonishing series of revelations. Our perspective on every-thing was fundamentally changed—on religion, on science, on nature, onlife, on death. It was during this time that I ran into the two types ofsituations in which I was asked by someone, “How do I know thatSwedenborg is sane and truthful?” I thus became empirically aware of twotypes of resistance to the revelations in the Writings of Swedenborg: first,from family and friends; second, from scientists and theologians. The firsttype of resistance may be called informal or commonsensical; the secondtype, formal or doctrinal.
Common sense dictates that we be wary of grandiose and delusionalclaims other people may make. It is useful to adopt a “negative bias” asreflected in, “Why should I believe these fantastic claims?” Note, however,that this is in the form of a question, thus indicating willingness to at leastlisten to the argument and evidence, if any. The informal, common sensestance is less rigid than the formal, doctrinal stance, which operates by
167
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
excluding in advance anything that is not already in agreement with theprimary assumptions and proposals.
Commonsensical and doctrinal resistance to Swedenborg are purelyexternal to the Writings. From this external perspective people may seemy involvement with Swedenborg as gullibility or intellectual affectationfor the occult or unusual. However these attitudes and judgments reflecton the people who have them, and leave untouched any examination of themerit of Swedenborg’s proposals and revelations. It is important to seethat Swedenborg cannot be treated as an ordinary case. Swedenborgiansdo not ordinarily question the standard basis of psychiatric medicine anddiagnosis. Thus, if an adolescent in a Swedenborgian family in say BrynAthyn, PA, a suburb of Philadelphia where hundreds of such families livetoday, should suddenly start claiming that he talks to spirits and travels toheaven and hell on a recurrent basis, and speaks to spirits from otherplanets, the Swedenborgian parents would surely take the adolescent to apsychiatrist and might admit the diagnosis of mental illness.
Looking at Swedenborg as an ordinary case history almost certainlyforces a psychiatrist to a diagnosis of mania or psychosis of some sort. It’sonly when we remove Swedenborg from the ordinary-case scenario, andcategorize him as historically unique and special, that the psychiatricdiagnosis can be lifted as inappropriate or inapplicable. This cannot bedone from an external perspective because psychiatrists would have nowarrant or opportunity to lift the applicability of the standard diagnosis.But from an inner perspective, which critically and analytically examinesthe writings as a scientific proposal, it is possible to confirm that Swedenborgis a unique case requiring a paradigm shift.
The process will soon begin whereby scientists will be examiningSwedenborg’s writings as scientific proposals, and from this inner per-spective, a judgment will arise which I predict will be positive and willfundamentally alter science and its theory and method. As a scientist andbehaviorist within scientific psychology, I have made such an examinationof Swedenborg’s writings and have seen their fundamental merit. It hasinfluenced my subsequent scientific research and theory, and has led meto attempt some of the conceptual translation process that is required tobridge the gap between the eighteenth century and the twenty-first.
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
168
IS SWEDENBORG’S DUALISM SCIENTIFIC?
Contemporary scientists are by training oriented to empiricism, thatis, to a mutual agreement that hypotheses, theories, and explanations areto be confirmed by data obtained through an approved scientific method-ology. Scientific disciplines differ in detail regarding what are considered“approved” methodologies. However, there are general, cross-disciplin-ary agreements which are based in the logic of experimentalism andresearch design. These principles are transmitted formally to new scien-tists, so that graduate students in any discipline that want to be recognizedas scientific, cannot obtain their Ph.D. degree without proving their under-standing of these principles in required examinations and in the doing ofresearch that conforms to these principles.
What today’s scientists acquire by routine training, eighteenth cen-tury contemporaries of Swedenborg had to acquire by intellectual geniusand leadership. It was the genius of Descartes, Leibniz, Wolff, Hume,Locke, Swedenborg, Newton, and Kant, among the well-known earlyfigures, who engineered the basis of our modern scientific intellectualstructure upon which we have relied to build a rapidly evolving modernsociety.
Swedenborg was obsessively concerned with rationality and empiri-cism. This is evident in both his Philosophical Works and his TheologicalWritings. He was extremely careful to use only rational appeals, and heinsisted that all rational accounts can and should be confirmed withempirical facts or observations.
In many instances he describes experimental manipulations of condi-tions to produce a predicted effect, emphasizing that without these fac-tual, sensual, empirical observations or confirmations, the human minddoes not give interior assent to anything. In other words, the modern mindcan only accept an account of God that is rational and can be empiricallyconfirmed. This idea is known in New Church circles as “Nunc Licet,”which is Latin for “Now it is permitted” and represents an inscriptionSwedenborg saw in the spiritual world on a temple gate that contained theWord of the Second Coming (see TCR 508).
Here are a few passages that show Swedenborg’s orientation towardempirical confirmations. The relevant specific phrase is emphasized.
169
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
A certain person was let into that dark cloud where the infernals are, in
order that he might know how the case is with those who are there; he being
protected by the Lord by means of angels. Speaking from thence with me
he said that there was there so great a rage of insanity against good and
truth, and especially against the Lord, that he was amazed that it could
possibly be resisted; for the Infernals breathed nothing but hatred, re-
venge, and slaughter, with such violence that they desired to destroy all
in the universe; so that unless this rage was continually repelled by the
Lord, the whole human race would perish. (AC 3340)
It has been given me to know from much experience that in the natural
world and its three kingdoms there is nothing whatever that does not
represent something in the spiritual world, or that has not something
there to which it corresponds. Besides many other experiences, this was
made evident also from the following. On several occasions when I was
speaking of the viscera of the body, and was tracing their connection from
those which are of the head to those which are of the chest, and so on to
those which are of the abdomen, the angels that were above me led my
thoughts through the spiritual things to which those viscera correspond,
and this so that there was not the least error. They thought not at all of the
viscera of the body of which I was thinking, but only of the spiritual
things to which these correspond. Such is the intelligence of angels that
from spiritual things they know all things in the body in general and
particular, even the most secret things, such as can never come to man’s
knowledge; nay, they know everything there is in the universal world,
without a mistake; and this because from spiritual things are the causes,
and the beginnings of causes. (AC 2992)
That the Word in the letter stores up such things within it, is often
presented to the sight of the spirits or souls who come into the other life;
and it has sometimes been granted me to be present when this was done,
as may be seen from the experiences adduced in the first part of this work
concerning the Holy Scripture or Word, as containing things Divine
which are manifest to good spirits and angels (nos. 1767–1776, and 1869–
1879); from which experiences I may for the sake of confirmation again
relate what now follows. (AC 3473)
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
170
Nevertheless all these means have been disclosed in the internal sense of
the Word, and are manifest before those who are in that sense, thus before the
angels, who see and perceive innumerable things on this subject, of which
scarcely one can be unfolded and explained in a manner suited to the
apprehension of man. [3] But from effects and the signs thereof it is in some
measure manifest to man how the case is with this conjunction, for the rational
mind (that is, man’s interior will and understanding) ought to represent
itself in the natural mind just as this mind represents itself in the face and
its expressions, insomuch that as the face is the countenance of the natural
man, so the natural mind should be the countenance of the rational mind.
(AC 3573)
It was also once shown me to the life what societies they are, and of what
quality, and how they flow in and act, which constitute the province of
the face, and flow into the muscles of the forehead, of the cheeks, of the
chin, and of the neck, and what communication there is between them. In
order that this might be presented to life, it was allowed them by means of
influx and in various ways to present the appearance of a face. In like
manner it was shown what societies, and of what quality, flow into the lips,
into the tongue, into the eyes, and into the ears and it was also given to speak
with them, and thus to be fully instructed. In this way it was made evident
that all who come into heaven are organs or members of the Grand Man;
and also that heaven is never shut, but that the greater its numbers the
stronger is the endeavor, the stronger the force, and the stronger the
action; and further, that the heaven of the Lord is immeasurable, so
immeasurable as to exceed all belief; the inhabitants of this earth being
very few in comparison, and almost as a pool compared with the ocean.
(AC 3631)
In order that it may be still better known how the case is with representatives in
the other life, that is, with those things which appear in the world of
spirits, take some further examples. When the angels are speaking about
the doctrinal things of charity and faith, then sometimes in a lower
sphere, where there is a corresponding society of spirits, there appears the
form or pattern of a city or cities, with palaces therein exhibiting such skill
in architecture as is amazing, so that you would say that the very art itself
171
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
was there in its native home; not to mention houses of varied aspect; and
wonderful to say in all these objects both in general and in particular
there is not the smallest point, or visible atom, that does not represent
something of the angelic idea and speech: so that it is evident what innu-
merable things are contained in these; and also what is signified by the
cities seen by the prophets in the Word; and likewise what by the holy
city or New Jerusalem; and what by the cities in the prophetic Word;
namely, the doctrinal things of charity and faith (nos. 402, 2449). (AC
3216)
But I know that these are arcana too deep to fall within apprehension; and
this as before said for the reason that they are things unknown; but as the
internal sense describes them, and this as to all their circumstances, they
must needs be set forth, no matter how much they may appear to be
above the apprehension. At the very least it may in this way be seen what
great arcana there are in the internal sense of the Word; also that the
arcana are such as scarcely to be seen in the light of the world, in which
man is during his life in the body, but that they always appear more
distinctly and clearly in proportion as man comes from the light of the
world into the light of heaven, into which he comes after death; thus into
the light in which blessed and happy souls are, that is, the angels. (AC
3086)
Who could know, except from an interior searching of the Word, and at the
same time from revelation, that these words, “Laban ran out of doors
unto the man, unto the fountain,” signify the desire of the affection of
good toward the truth that was to be initiated into truth Divine? And yet
this is what the angels perceive when these words are read by man; for such
are the correspondences between a man’s ideas and an angel’s that while
the man takes these words according to the sense of the letter, and has the
idea of Laban as running out of doors to the man unto the fountain, the
angel perceives the desire of the affection of good toward the truth which
was to be initiated into truth Divine. For the angels have no idea of Laban,
nor of running, nor of a fountain, but they have spiritual ideas corre-
sponding to these. That there is such a correspondence of actual things, and
thence of ideas, natural and spiritual, may be seen from what was said
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
172
above concerning correspondences (see nos. 1563, 1568, 2763, 2987-3003,
3021). (AC 3131)
[2] That there can be no conjunction of falsity with good, or of truth with
evil, but only of falsity with evil, and of truth with good, is has been given
me to perceive to the life, and I have perceived that the case is as follows: When
a man has the affection of good, that is, when he wills good from the
heart, then whenever anything is to be thought of that is to be willed and
done, his good willing flows into his thinking, and there it applies itself to
the knowledges which are there, and joins itself with them as its recipient
vessels, and by this conjunction impels him so to think, to will, and to act.
(AC 3033)
[3] In the other life such persons (however much in this life they may have
seemed to be more highly instructed than others) are more stupid than
others and so far as they are in the persuasion that they are in truth, they
induce thick darkness on others. Such have at times been with me; but they
were not susceptible of any affection of good from truth, howsoever the
truths were recalled to their mind which they had known in the life of the
body; for evil was with them, with which truths could not be conjoined.
Neither can such persons be in the company of the good; but if there is
anything of natural good with them, they are vastated even till they know
nothing of truth; and then there is insinuated into the remaining good
something of truth, as much as the little remaining good can receive. But
they who have been in the affection of good from the heart, are able to
receive all truth in accordance with the amount and the quality of the good
that has been with them. (AC 3033)
To the above I will add two memorable experiences. First: After the problem
concerning the soul had been discussed and solved in the gymnasium
[no. 315], I saw the audience going out in procession, the Chief Teacher in
front, after him the elders in whose midst were the five young men who
had given the answers and then the rest. Coming out, they withdrew to
the sides of the house where were walks bordered by shrubs. Gathering
there, they separated into small groups which were so many companies
173
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
of young men conversing together on matters of wisdom. In each group
was one of the wise men from the balcony. Seeing them from my lodging,
I became in the spirit, and going to them in the spirit, approached the chief
teacher who lately had proposed the question concerning the soul. When
he saw me, he said: “Who are you? When I saw you coming on the road, it
surprised me that you now came into my sight and now passed out of it;
that is, at one moment you were visible to me and suddenly became
invisible. You certainly are not in our state of life.” To this I answered,
smiling, “I am not a player of tricks, or a Vertumnus, but am by turns,
now in your light, now in your shade, and thus a sojourner and also a
native”
[2] At this, the Chief Teacher looked at me and said, “You speak
things strange and wonderful. Tell me who you are.” I then said: “I am in
the world called the natural world, in which you were and from which
you have departed; and I am also in the world into which you came and
in which you now are, which is called the spiritual world. Thus it is, that
I am in a natural state and at the same time in a spiritual, being in a natural
state with men on earth, and in a spiritual state with you. When in a
natural state, I am not visible to you, but when in a spiritual state I am
visible. My being of this nature has been granted me by the Lord. To you,
enlightened man, it is known that a man of the natural world does not see
a man of the spiritual world, or the reverse. Therefore, when I let my
spirit down into the body I was not visible to you, but when I sent it out of
the body I was visible . . .” (CL 326)
To the above shall be added the following memorable experience : (. . .) [3]
An angel, looking down from heaven, heard these words and in order that
the young man might go no further in profaning marriages, he inter-
rupted him and said, “Come up hither and I will show you in a living way
what heaven is, and what hell and the nature of the hell for confirmed
whoremongers.” He then showed him the way, and the young man went
up. After being received, he was led first into a paradisal garden where
were fruit-trees and flowers which from their beauty, pleasantness and
fragrance filled the animus of all with the delights of life. Seeing these, he
expressed his great admiration; but he was then in the external sight in
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
174
which he had been when seeing like things in the world. In this sight he
was rational, but in his internal sight, wherein whoredom played the
chief role and occupied every least thought, he was not rational.
Therefore his external sight was closed and his internal sight opened.
With this opened, he said, “What do I see now? Is it not straw and sticks of
wood? And what do I smell now? Are they not bad smells? Where now
are the things of paradise?” The angel said: “They are near by and at
hand, but they do not appear before your internal sight which is scortatory, for
that sight turns heavenly things into infernal, seeing only their opposites.
Every man has an internal mind and an external, and so an internal sight
and an external. With the evil, the internal mind is insane, and the
external wise, while with the good, the internal is wise and from this the
external also; and in the spiritual world a man sees objects according to
the nature of his mind.”
[4] From power given him, the angel then closed the young man’s internal
sight and opened his external. He then led him through the gates towards
the center of the dwellings. There he saw magnificent palaces of alabaster,
marble, and various precious stones, and beside them porticos, and col-
umns round about, overlaid and encompassed with stupendous insignia
and adornments. On seeing these, he was amazed and said, “What do I
see? I see magnificent things in their true magnificence, and architecture
in its true art.” Thereupon the angel again closed his external sight and
opened his internal sight, which was evil, being filthily scortatory. When
this was done, he cried out, saying, “What do I see now? Where am I?
Where now are the palaces? And the magnificent things? I see heaps,
ruins, and places full of holes!”
After this . . . his internal sight was opened and the external closed as
before, and being asked what he saw now, he replied, “Nothing but walls,
here of rushes, there of straw, and yonder of fire-brands.” [6] He was then
brought once more into his external state of mind, and maidens who were
beauties, being images of heavenly affection, were brought to him and
addressed him with the sweet voice of their affection. On seeing and
hearing them, his face changed and he returned of himself to his internals
which were scortatory; and because these cannot endure anything of
heavenly love and, on the other hand, cannot be endured by heavenly
175
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
love, they both vanished, the maidens from the sight of the man, and the
man from the sight of the maidens.
“. . . Know, however, that with every one in this world, his externals are
successively closed and his internals opened. In this way they are pre-
pared for heaven or for hell. And because the evil of whoredom defiles
the internals of the mind more than any other evil, you must needs be
brought down to the filthy things of your own love, and these are in hells
where the caverns stink of excrement. Who cannot know from reason that in
the spiritual world, what is unchaste and lascivious is impure and un-
clean, and thus that there is nothing which more pollutes and defiles a
man and induces on him what is infernal. Take care, therefore, that you
glory no more in your whoredom that therein you are a masculine man
above others. I predict that you will become so feeble that you will scarcely
know where your masculinity is. Such is the lot that awaits those who
glory in the potency of whoredom.”
After hearing this, the young man descended and returned to the
world of spirits and to his former companions. He then spoke with them
modestly and chastely, yet not for long. (CL 477)
Numerous additional examples can be found that show Swedenborg’sempirical orientation through and through, his continuous effort in neverasking the reader to believe by auhoritativeness or blind belief from atrusting attitude. He understood and taught that nothing can be acceptedin an interior way but that which is freely seen as true from one’s ownperspective, knowledge, and understanding. Hence his persistent effort incasting every principle or concept into a rational mode that examinestheoretical propositions in the light of empirical confirmations. Any ac-count or explanation about God’s Divine operations on the planet, such asthose systematically laid out in his work titled Divine Providence, areworthless unless they can be empirically confirmed by the reader. Thisconfirmation process is thus inevitable and at the center of Swedenborg’sdescription of regeneration and character change. Hence he spends somuch text carefully presenting the scientific facts that knowledgeablepersons can confirm, and thus come to freely accept the rational explana-tion of spiritual principles and facts.
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
176
The exclusion of Swedenborg from most, if not all, scientific disci-plines is not due to his lack of empiricism. This fact cannot be stressed toostrongly. Swedenborg is excluded by the attitude and commitment tomonism (materialism) and atheism (secular humanism), not lack of em-piricism. Such a single-minded commitment automatically and withoutconsideration excludes Swedenborg who has made scientific dualism acentral aspect of his orientation. The major empiricists in the history ofmodern science, like Hobbes, Descartes, Leibniz, Newton, Darwin, andEinstein, who acknowledged nature as a work of God, then believed thatHe removed Himself from the equation, “Watching us from a distance” asa recent popular song says. But Swedenborg refused to be a weekdayscientist, and felt compelled by sincerity and consistency, to integrate theweekday science and the Sunday deity. This integration was achieved bydeveloping the dualist position, which was, that there exist two sub-stances, one natural, and the other spiritual within the natural, but not intime and space. His works are about the scientific and empirical details ofthis proposition.
A recent article titled “Toward a Science of Experience” by A. Kuklaappeared in The Journal of Mind and Behavior (Spring 1983). It presents areevaluation of the legitimacy of introspective evidence in scientific psy-chology and concludes that the usual private/public distinction behavior-ists make, is not logically tenable because both types of data fulfill therequirements of objectivity: terms must refer to events, events must bepublicly observable, explanations must be verifiable by events, conceptsmust apply to a class of observations or properties, observations musthave inter-subjective agreement when conditions are met, experimentalmanipulation of known conditions must produce predictable results.
It is remarkable that all of Swedenborg’s writings fully meet these sixrequirements for scientific objectivity. The quotations presented just abovein this section clearly show this, especially in the emphasized phrases thatshow his empiricism. Swedenborg always defined his terms preciselywhere others started being vague. Numerous people have written aboutspirituality, about the afterlife, about heaven and hell, about the subcon-scious mind, about sin and regeneration, about life on other planets, aboutthe past, present and future. Swedenborg is the only one, to our knowl-edge, who has combined all these areas, has integrated them into one
177
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
rational theory or account, and has presented numerous pieces of empiri-cal evidence to confirm them. In Swedenborg’s writings we find a com-plete exposition of scientific dualism and its empirical methodology.
Swedenborg does not appeal to unique capabilities in presenting hisexperiences and observations “when in the spirit.” Anyone who is broughtinto that mental state can witness what Swedenborg has reported. Asshown in the quotations immediately above, Swedenborg’s observationswere social in nature, always involving other people. Anyone presentcould objectively perceive what Swedenborg observed and reported. Hiswitnessings, or testimony, are in that sense public, not private. The factthat we can’t place ourselves into that mental state by our current level ofskills, is a technical problem of methodology, to be solved in the future. Inthe meantime, his data stand.
THE SIX MINIMAL PREMISES OF DUALIST SCIENCE
1. The existence of the dual sun
All scientific theories and models of phenomena must include anaccount of the dual sun: the Sun of the spiritual world and its atmospheresand geography, and the sun of the natural world with its atmospheres andland masses on planets, replicated numberless times in sun-planet loca-tions throughout the natural universe.
The dual sun is replicated in all parts thereof. Thus, any object pro-duced through the dual sun such as a pebble or protein cell, will replicatewithin its structure the vertical degrees of the dual sun. The externalstructure of the object will be visible or measurable through tools of thesenses, such as an electronic microscope or an identifiable biochemicalreaction, but the internal structure produced by the spiritual Sun willrequire spiritual detection devices, which are rational, objective, and con-firmable by others.
The scientific account of phenomena, objects, and properties includesthe dual sun when it shows how cause-effect relations are actually rela-tions between the object’s inner and outer structure, replicating the origi-nal cause-effect relation between the Sun of the spiritual world and the sunof the natural planetary system. The former produces the latter and is
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
178
contained within it synchronously. Sequential cause-effect in productionor etiology is replicated in synchronous action between the vertical de-grees.
The dual sun creates its own atmospheres and geography whichSwedenborg describes in minute detail. These descriptions must be ac-cepted as scientific revelations, that is, facts about reality that were un-known in science, and serve to assist us in building a rational civilizationthat is in harmony with spiritual reality, thus serving to improve theorderly evolution of society and mind.
2. The existence of vertical degrees
The cause, which precedes the effect, continues its presence in theeffect by remaining within its interior and acting synchronously. Removethe cause within the synchronous effect, and the effect ceases to exist.Every natural phenomenon that physics and biology have seen so far cannow be looked at again in this new paradigm. For instance: what is thecause of your car accelerating when the light turns green? It is common togive a mechanical account of the cause in terms of sequences involving gaspedal, fuel, combustion engine, axle, wheel, and tire friction. In the newdual paradigm, these sequences would be correlated effects, while theircause lies in their interior structure determined by the spiritual Sun, in thiscase, your intention as a driver to speed up. This human motive is thecause of the acceleration, and the acceleration continues to exist until thisspiritual cause is removed from its interior.
Similar, but more complex dual accounts will no doubt be constructedfor say, the action of hostile bacteria on the spine in meningitis, or acatastrophic earthquake, or the diffusion properties of light. Many suchdual scientific accounts are found in Swedenborg throughout his volumi-nous writings, both theological and pre-theological. The relationship be-tween inner and outer in vertical degrees is called “correspondence.”When we consider the production phase of any object or process the causeprecedes the effect in time, thus the functional relation is asynchronous.But when the production phase is completed, and the effect is fully inexistence or operation, then the prior cause enters and remains within theinner structure of the effect. Thus, cause and effect operate synchronously.
179
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
As soon as the correspondential coupling is interrupted, the effect ceasesto exist.
For instance, the body is alive with integrated biological operations aslong as these natural effects retain a functional connection with the soul,the spiritual organ responsible for maintaining and directing cell action.When the physical organs and processes no longer respond to their innercause due to illness or mechanical injury, the soul together with the mind,also called the spirit, separates from its relation to the body. At this pointthe natural body becomes a mere corpse, quickly losing its human formand returning to its mineral form, while the spirit now assumes its role asthe external body within which is contained the mind or will and under-standing. This is called the afterlife in the spiritual world, or life in eter-nity.
Swedenborg has described this life with many details that inform uson its geography, government, daily activities, philosophy, andknowledges. It is a dramatic social-psychological life in which people’sinmost degree, the plane of their feelings and intentions, produces ascause, the outward effects in the ecology of the spirit such as location or co-presence with others and the quality of the appearing surroundings suchas weather, vegetation, animal life, mood, and the artistic style of visibleobjects.
3. The existence of influx
Newton passed into the spiritual world in 1727 before Swedenborg’ssojourn and stay in London. Later, however, the two men met in thespiritual world: “I spoke with Newton concerning a vacuum, and concern-ing colors” (LJ Post. 265), and he goes on regarding Newton’s changedview on the concept of vacuum:
When he had heard these things, Newton said that before this he had
desisted from that idea, and he would desist from it hereafter; knowing
that he is now in the spiritual world, in which, nevertheless, according to
his former idea, would have been his vacuum; and that even now he is a
man, and therein he thinks, feels, acts, yea breathes, and this could not
take place in a vacuum which is nothing, but in something which is, and
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
180
from Esse exists and subsists, and that an interstitial nothing is impos-
sible, because that would be destructive of something, that is of essences
and substances which are something. For something and nothing are
altogether opposites, even so that he was horrified at the idea of nothing,
and would beware of it, lest his mind fall into a swoon. (CL 266)
Newton in the spiritual world has a new concept of color, as describedby Swedenborg:
Concerning colors he said that in the world he had believed that they
originated from the substances, as it were, of different colored materials
continually flowing forth from the solar ocean, and adding themselves
continually to like things in objects in the world, likewise when they pass
through pellucid objects following then the ways of light, according to its
diffractions and refractions, and proceeding as like to like, thus red to red,
blue to blue, yellow to yellow, and so on, as in prisms, crystalline globes,
and vapors whence come rainbows.
But the angels did not acknowledge this cause of colors, saying that
there are colors in the spiritual world as well as in the natural world; and
in the spiritual world they are vivid, splendid, and variegated more than
in the natural world, and that they know that they are variegations of
their light corresponding to their love or good, and to their wisdom or
truth, and that the sun from which their light proceeds, is the Lord
Himself, whose Divine love presents around Him the appearance of a
sun, and the Divine wisdom therefrom the appearance of light, and that
from that sun, which as was said, is pure love, no such substances or
matters flow forth, but that pure light presents to view variegations of
colors in objects according to the reception of wisdom by the angels the
color red according as their wisdom is derived from good, and the color
bright white according as their wisdom is derived from truth, and the rest
as they partake of the defect and absence of them, which there correspond
to shade in the world.
Moreover the angels, by their spiritual ideas, by which they are able
to present and bring forth the causes of things to the life and to full
consent, demonstrated that colors are nothing else than variegations of
flamy light and bright white light, in objects according to their forms; and
181
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
that colors are not materials, so neither is light, because they correspond
to the love and wisdom of the angels, from whom they proceed by Divine
operation; and their love and wisdom are not material but spiritual.
Neither are heat and light in the world material, but natural, and they
inflow into matters, and they modify themselves in them according to the
arms of the parts. Therefore neither are colors material, as they would be
if they existed from different colored atoms. At length from some indig-
nation they said, “Who cannot see a paradox in the Newtonian cause, yea
what is absurd?” And they departed, saying they would return if he
would discern spiritually or even naturally concerning colors, and not so
materially and sensually.
Then some spirits approached, and said to him [Newton], “We en-
treat you to think of colors not as originating from some small prism or
from some wall, but from the green color of all the woods and grassy
fields of the whole world in which you were; can you conceive of a
continuous efflux from the sun of a green color alone, and at the same
time an influx, and a continual restoration, likewise of a continual influx
of gray or stone color into the mountains of the whole earth, and so on?
Can you then conceive of a continuous ocean of green alone, and of rock
color alone? Tell us where they go, where they subsist, do they proceed
into the universe? Or do they fall downwards somewhere, or ascend
upwards? From these things perchance new earths exist, for they must be
in great abundance because they are material.” After he thought of this
thing more deeply, he said, “Now I know that colors are modifications of
light in objects, in the forms of which they make general planes, upon
which the light is variegated according to the forms of the parts, whence
are colors.” These are the words of Newton himself, which he wishes me
to communicate. (LJ Post. 267)
And in another place he adds:
Respecting the planes of colors, he [Newton] spoke in this fashion: that
there were three: white from light, red from fire, and black from shade;
and that all the varieties of colors arise therefrom. (SD 6064)
These accounts, and many others like it on the subject of influx, revealthat light and its phenomena of colors visible in the natural world are not
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
182
material substances but spiritual. In other words, visible or measurableaspects of light such as quanta, wavelength, and speed, are natural effectsproduced by spiritual influx. Newton’s self-conscious presence in theafterlife forces him to modify his scientific paradigm that is based onvacuum, light, and motion as material forces and substances. By acknowl-edging the dual sun, the continuity of cause-effect as vertical degrees, andthe operation of influx, Newton shows the way our modern science canforge the new dualism.
4. The existence of vertical community
On this subject, Swedenborg writes:
Before my mind was opened, so that I could speak with spirits, and
so be persuaded by living experience; for many years previous, such
proofs existed with me, that I am now astonished, that yet I did not come
into persuasion concerning the Lord’s government, through spirits. Not
only were there dreams, for several years, informing me concerning those
things which were written, but there were, also, changes of state, when I
wrote; a certain extraordinary light in those things which were written.
Afterwards, also, many visions, when my eyes were closed, and light
miraculously given; and spirits sensibly (inflowed). It was as manifest to
perception (sensum) as the corporeal senses. Many times (occurred) infes-
tations through various modes, by evil spirits, in temptations. Then,
afterwards, when those things were written to which evil spirits were
averse, so that I was so obsessed as nearly to be overcome with horror (ita
ut poene obsiderer ad horrorem). Fiery lights were seen. Speech (loqueloe) in
morning-time (was heard), besides many other things; until a certain
spirit addressed me in a few words. I was greatly astonished that he
should perceive my thoughts, and afterwards wondered greatly when
(my mind) was opened so that I could converse with spirits; in like
manner the spirit (was then surprised) that I should be astonished. From
these things it may be concluded with what difficulty man can be led to
believe that he is ruled by the Lord through spirits, and with what
difficulty he recedes from the opinion that he lives his own life from
himself, apart from spirits—1748, August 27. (SD 2951)
183
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
In terms of psychological impact, this scientific revelation is the mostdramatic and may have extraordinary influence on our civilization andself-conception as a human race. “Horizontal” community can be used todiscuss ethnic and cross-cultural differences and similarities as we firststudy them in history, geography, government, social sciences, and thehumanities. But “vertical” community is a reference to influx by corre-spondence of what people in the spiritual world feel and think into whatpeople on earth feel and think. This kind of influx has not been describedor even suspected in the entire history of science, let alone described ingreat detail as it is in Swedenborg.
Our thoughts and feelings vary moment to moment. Psychology,psychiatry, cognitive science, and neuroscience have all dealt with aspectsof thinking and feeling, but no one has proposed a full and adequateexplanation of the source of this variation. In Swedenborg we now havethe revealed details of how and why thoughts and feelings we have varyand succeed one another in highly constrained ways not unlike these bywhich linguistic syntax constrains the form of the sentences we utter (DP48; 49; 71).
Our thoughts and feelings are constrained and influenced in twoways: immediate by the Divine and mediate by the Divine through thevertical community. Divine constraints exercised immediately and di-rectly without intermediaries are described by Swedenborg under therubric of the Laws of Divine Providence and the Laws of Divine Permis-sions. The Divine “permits” certain departures or modifications (corrup-tions; adulteries) but only in so far as good can be brought out of them. TheDivine blocks or inhibits mental departures that are not of spiritual benefitto anyone, actor or victim. Though we have freedom of choice and free-dom of thought, it is not absolute but constrained within limits that havebeen revealed.
Divine constraints are also exercised indirectly, through intermediar-ies, along a vertical chain of human beings by correspondence acrossvertical degrees. The Divine then acts into the highest plane of the mindand those who dwell in that state called “celestial angels of the thirdheaven.” They become conscious of the thoughts and feelings whereuponthese constrain by correspondence and influx the thoughts and feelings ofthe plane immediately below it and those who dwell in that state called
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
184
“spiritual angels of the second heaven.” The vertical chain of correspon-dence thus descends from the Divine through the entire range of thevertical community from highest heaven to lowest hell.
Our thoughts and feelings while we are in the physical body from themoment we take our first breath at birth (but not the fetus) to the momentwe breath our last (coma or death) are entirely constrained by our spiritualassociations which we inherit and which we strengthen or weaken bymeans of the decisions and choices we make and love. The vertical com-munity implies the existence of a common unlearned universal thought-language used by the entire race. It also implies that thinking and feelingare social activities, not individual. It is not possible to think on your own.Some spiritual society must be in contact to provide influx from their mindto ours and without this influx we cannot think—we would “swoon” or belike someone in a coma.
Our thinking or feeling is a group phenomenon, a community affair.The content of what we think or feel and what the spiritual societies incontact think and feel, is determined by correspondence. These laws ofcorrespondence, known to the ancients but later forgotten, have now beenrevealed again through Swedenborg. Surprise of surprises: these corre-spondences are embedded in Sacred Scriptures and in ordinary language,such as the correspondences between light and truth, emotion or love andheat, water and truth, poison and sin, and many less known ones such asgarden and intelligence, snake and science, seed and intentions, the num-ber forty and temptation, the number three and completion, and so on.
Swedenborg was able to instruct himself empirically as to these corre-spondences. His revelations are not by poetic inspiration of metaphorsand similes. He was able to observe correspondences visually and experi-entially through his ability to be present consciously in the plane of thespiritual world. For instance, when people there discussed spiritual ideasfrom revelation, horses appeared. When someone he conversed with had ahostile vindictive personality, all sorts of dangerous and noxious animaland vegetative life appeared. When speaking with angels or visiting theirplane of habitation, the surroundings similarly reflected natural thingsthat were exact correspondences of the spiritual meaning of their life-style,affections, and topics of discussion, reflected in unending detail about thecolor of walls, the material of clothes, the art of architecture and jewelry,
185
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
and so forth. In the twelve volumes of the Arcana Coelestia and the eightvolumes of the Apocalypse Explained and Revealed, Swedenborg undertooka verse-by-verse, and phrase-by-phrase analysis of three books of the Bible(Genesis, Exodus, Revelations) in which he enters into the vast details ofcorrespondences, or the cause-effect analysis of natural phenomena bysynchronous influx.
Our civilization has thus received a new consciousness of ourselves ashuman beings, including the knowledge that our intimate and most per-sonal thoughts and feelings are in fact operations of communication andmutual influence between ourselves and the entire human race across alltimes and planets. Swedenborg says that in God all things are as one andthat God sees the entire human race as one person. This is another way ofsaying that nothing in the universe can exist by itself and that all things areinterconnected (DP 74; 124). Though this wisdom was long known toindividuals in many generations, it is only in Swedenborg that we arefinally given the details of how this operates.
Many issues will be investigated as psychology and society as a wholebegin to assimilate the concept of the vertical community. How can weinfluence our vertical associations? If we knew this we could apply theknowledge to our activities in therapy, instruction, inventiveness, andsocial activism to bring about new thoughts and feelings, hence newvalues and ways of behaving. Swedenborg clearly states that the purposeof the universe and all its phenomena such as the dual sun, influx, and thevertical community is a human purpose serving our regeneration, that is,our ability to raise our immortal mind or spirit into the higher planes ofhuman existence to eternity.
Without these two faculties [liberty and rationality] we would not have
immortality and eternal life. This follows from what has just been said,
that by means of them there is conjunction with the Lord and also
reformation and regeneration: by conjunction we have immortality and
by reformation and regeneration we have eternal life. Since by means of
these faculties there is conjunction of the Lord with every person, with
the evil as well as with the good, as has been said, therefore every
individual has immortality. But eternal life, that is, the life of heaven, is
given to that person in whom there is reciprocal conjunction ranging
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
186
from inmost things to ultimates. From these considerations may be evi-
dent the reasons why the Lord preserves these two faculties in us unim-
paired and as sacred in every step of His Divine Providence. (DP 96)
5. No function without substance or the dualist methodology
The new scientific paradigm needs a workable methodology in orderto proceed and progress. We now have a scientifically revealed method ofresearch and theory in dualist science. It consists of our following the mapavailable in the hard-wired built-in structure of correspondential influxacross vertical degrees. We now have available a practical method forinvestigating empirically cause-effect relations in the natural world. Wehave been given the rational principles that constrict what can happen andwhat cannot as laid forth in the laws of providence and permissions. Wehave also been given the principle of correspondences across verticaldegrees, how they operate and functionally interrelate, both in etiology ordevelopment, and in synchronous operation. No one has offered a countof the size of the database of correspondences in Swedenborg, but as aglobal guess I would say it runs into the millions. There have been at-tempts to enumerate and categorize some of the correspondences bySwedenborg in the indexes at the ends of his works, and definitional lists(for example, Ontology), and there have been dictionary compilations bySwedenborgian scholars (Potts; Worcester; Sechrist; L. James).
Noam Chomsky, architect of the new generative linguistics, is one ofthe few influential figures in science who have fought a long intellectualbattle against “behaviorism,” which has been a dominant approach inPsychology identified with B. F. Skinner. Chomsky defied the long tradi-tion of materialism and asserted that humans are born with a mental organhe called LAD or Language Acquisition Device. Chomsky redefined lin-guistics as “a branch of cognitive psychology” and invented an entirelynew methodology for linguistics that was adopted by the entire professionas the new dominant paradigm. Chomsky defines the mind as a “biologi-cal organ” made of sub-organs. His approach thus follows the rule of “NoFunction Without Substance.” However he had no specific suggestionsregarding the nature of this mental substance. Swedenborg is unique inthe specificity with which he identifies the mental organ, which he callsthe “spirit.”
187
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
Swedenborg was initiated into this scientific methodology by theextraordinary love he maintained for the idea known globally to people as“all things are connected.” This idea is held as a primary tenet in bothreligion/theology and science. In religion: there is nothing that God doesnot see, or, there is nothing beyond or outside God’s will and power. Inscience: determinism rules and there are no exceptions. “Nothing outsideGod” and “all things determined” are thus principles generated by therational law that all things are connected. However, though this principleis known and accepted, it is not understood and practiced in my genera-tion of scientists. We have carved out our various disciplines and special-izations so that we are freed in our theory building and in our researchfrom having to impose on ourselves the constriction that “all things areconnected” (DP 74; 124).
As a psychologist specializing in psycholinguistics, I was allowed bymy peers to formulate mini-theories that did not attempt to take intoaccount the fact that all things are connected. I could, for instance, obtainresearch grants and publish in refereed journals by looking for methods ofanalyzing discourse (dialog, self-reports, etc.) without being required tostate how thoughts are generated through feelings. Studying thoughtswithout the feelings that correspond to them and produce them (DLW412) is like studying the lungs without paying any attention to the heartand the circulation of the blood in the lungs. Such an account of the lungswould be worse than useless if decisions were to be based on it. Yet I amallowed to make scientific conclusions about thoughts without consider-ing their corresponding feelings. And many other scientists, in fact, thevast majority, if not all in the field of cognitive science, have done likewise.Only at the end of the 1990s as we met the millennium, was there a newemergent awareness of how feelings influence thoughts, as indicated in anew book announcing the birth of the field of “affective computing”(Picard, 1997).
Swedenborg has given a vivid illustration of the new dualist method-ology in his detailed analysis of how the affective and the cognitive componentsof the mind interact and are constrained by each other. Since the affectiveand cognitive organs of the mind are not visible to the microscope andcannot be scanned or imaged, we can gain specific details on their func-tional relations by applying to them what we know about the heart and the
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
188
lungs. All we need to know is that the heart corresponds to the affectivewhile the lungs correspond to the cognitive. Here are some of his manypresentations on this methodology:
It is known that heat and light go forth from the sun, and that all
things in the universe are recipients and grow warm and bright in the
degree in which they receive. So do heat and light go forth from the sun
where the Lord is; the heat going forth therefrom is love, and the light
wisdom (as shown in Part Second). Life, therefore, is from these two
which go forth from the Lord as a sun. That love and wisdom from the
Lord is life can be seen also from this, that man grows torpid as love
recedes from him, and stupid as wisdom recedes from him, and that were
they to recede altogether he would become extinct.
There are many things pertaining to love which have received other
names because they are derivatives, such as affections, desires, appetites,
and their pleasures and enjoyments; and there are many things pertain-
ing to wisdom, such as perception, reflection, recollection, thought, inten-
tion to an end; and there are many pertaining to both love and wisdom,
such as consent, conclusion, and determination to action; besides others.
All of these, in fact, pertain to both, but they are designated from the more
prominent and nearer of the two. From these two are derived ultimately
sensations, those of sight, hearing, smell, taste, and touch, with their
enjoyments and pleasures.
It is according to appearance that the eye sees: but it is the under-
standing that sees through the eye; consequently seeing is predicated also
of the understanding. The appearance is that the ear hears: but it is the
understanding that hears through the ear; consequently hearing is predi-
cated also of attention and giving heed, which pertain to the understand-
ing. The appearance is that the nose smells, and the tongue tastes but it is
the understanding that smells and also tastes by virtue of its perception;
therefore smelling and tasting are predicated also of perception. So in
other cases. The sources of all these are love and wisdom; from which it
can be seen that these two make the life of man (DLW 363).
I. All man’s thoughts are from the affections of his life’s love and there are no
thoughts whatever, nor can there be, except from them. It has been shown
189
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
above in this treatise, and also in the work entitled Angelic Wisdom
Concerning the Divine Love and Wisdom, particularly in the First and Fifth
Parts, what in their essence are the life’s love and the affections and
thoughts thence derived, and what the sensations and actions from these
are which arise in the body. Now since the causes from which human
prudence flows forth as an effect are derived from these, it is necessary
that something concerning these should also be stated here. For things
written elsewhere cannot be so closely connected with those written later
as they can if they are repeated and presented to view together.
[2] Earlier in this treatise, and in the one mentioned above on The
Divine Love and Wisdom, it was shown that in the Lord are Divine Love
and Divine Wisdom; that these two are Life itself; that from these two
man has will and understanding, will from the Divine Love and under-
standing from the Divine Wisdom; that to these two the heart and the
lungs in the body correspond; and that consequently it may be evident
that as the pulsation of the heart together with the respiration of the lungs
governs the whole man as to his body, so the will together with the
understanding governs the whole man as to his mind. Thus, it has been
shown, there are two principles of life in every man, the one natural and
the other spiritual, the natural principle of life being the pulsation of the
heart and the spiritual principle the will of the mind. Each of these joins to
itself a consort with which it cohabits and with which it performs the
functions of life, the heart joining to itself the lungs, and the will joining to
itself the understanding.
[3] Now since the soul of the will is love and the soul of the under-
standing is wisdom, both being from the Lord, it follows that love is the
life of everyone, and is life of such a quality as is joined to wisdom; or
what is the same, that the will is the life of everyone, and is life of such a
quality as is joined to the understanding. However, more on this subject
may be seen above in this treatise, and especially in the Angelic Wisdom
Concerning the Divine Love and Wisdom in the First and Fifth Parts. (DP 193)
Here Swedenborg continues to elaborate on the principle of corre-spondences as a methodology for dualist science. He first established thebasic paradigm: the causal flow is always unidirectional from the spiritualto the natural and never the reverse. When I discussed the sense of hearing
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
190
in my lectures to psychology students, I did not present the idea that “it isthe understanding that hears through the ear,” believing instead thathearing is the result of sound entering the brain through the ears in theform of nerve impulses that correspond to the air waves that correspondto the vocalizations of a speaker. All this was true, but hardly genuine as Iwas not required by the subject matter to discuss how from the brain theneural pattern became hearing or perceiving and understanding. It wasenough that I discuss how the physical information got to the brain.
At this point I was supposed to cease being a rational scientist andspeak in such irrational but permissible terms as, “My brain told me to goleft” or “Your brain knows that the outcome will be negative,” or, “Yourbrain is telling you to fall asleep,” etc., thus leaving unexplained how wego conceptually from “I” to the brain or from the brain to knowledge orunderstanding other than to think that the brain knows and the brainunderstands—clearly an illogical idea since it is the “I” that knows andunderstands. What we need is to show how the brain and the “I” connector communicate with each other. We are more aware of this irrationalattitude when we talk about computers. Though we say “the computerdecides which is faster and shows it to you first” and helpful things of thissort computers do for you, we know in the background through commonunderstanding that the computer does not think and decide but performsdata operations of a mechanical sort under the guidance and inner pres-ence of the programmer. Perhaps we tend to forget this, especially ascomputers are entering the affective computing phase of development;nevertheless when we are asked to explain the process with some level ofexpertise, we will only appeal to the computer as a system operated bysome programming software capable of organizing new incoming datathrough the digital loops created and laid down by the intelligence andwisdom of the programmer.
Swedenborg’s dualist methodology gives us a new honesty in science.His ethics of scientific research can be expressed by the phrase: NO FUNC-TION WITHOUT SUBSTANCE (DP 74). If everything is connected fromthe Divine to the natural event (the primary premise of dualist science),then there must be a means of determinism “from firsts to lasts.” Nothingdisconnected can exist (TCR 679). The connections are not mere wind, ormagic, or divine pronouncement: they are substantial. Substance is a
191
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
necessary concept of all science. The space as vacuum idea never had reallife in the modern mind. When I was in college in the 1950s, space explora-tion research was just beginning as a reality. There was tremendousinterest. Everybody always emphasized the idea that space was not empty,but filled with particles and fiery atmospheres, and even that it had ashape called gravitational bend, and so forth. The modern mind has neveraccepted a vacuum, and the postmodern mind does so even less.
Swedenborg traces the series of atmospheres from the spiritual Sun tohuman levels of mind to the earthly sun and its derivative minerals andcompounds. Swedenborg identified these atmospheres and their proper-ties by means of rational problem-solving using the methodology of corre-spondences arranged in conceptual series from the most external to themost internal of the human form. An illustration of his method may becited here:
Since all things of the mind have relation to the will and understanding,
and all things of the body to the heart and lungs, there are in the head two
brains, distinct from each other as will and understanding are distinct.
The cerebellum is especially the organ of the will, and the cerebrum of the
understanding. Likewise the heart and lungs in the body are distinct from
the remaining parts there. They are separated by the diaphragm, and are
enveloped by their own covering, called the pleura, and form that part of
the body called the chest. In the other parts of the body, called members,
organs, and viscera, there is a joining together of the two, and thus there
are pairs; for instance, the arms, hands, loins, feet, eyes, and nostrils; and
within the body the kidneys, ureters, and testicles; and the viscera which
are not in pairs are divided into right and left.
Moreover, the brain itself is divided into two hemispheres, the heart
into two ventricles, and the lungs into two lobes; the right of all these
having relation to the good of truth, and the left to the truth of good, or,
what is the same, the right having relation to the good of love from which
is the truth of wisdom, and the left having relation to the truth of wisdom
which is from the good of love. And because the conjunction of good and
truth is reciprocal, and by means of that conjunction the two become as it
were one, therefore the pairs in man act together and conjointly in func-
tions, motions, and senses” (DLW 384).
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
192
Future research will no doubt explore the full complex of functionalcorrespondences between body anatomy and mental operations. A majorrevelation has been given through identifying the affective organs of themind (feelings, emotions, motives, impulses, etc.) with specific parts of thebrain: right hemisphere in the cortex and cerebellum; and the cognitiveorgans of the mind (reasoning, memory, perception, comprehension, etc.)with the left hemisphere. (See also DLW 384). It is also revealed that thelungs correspond to the cognitive and the heart to the affective. StephenCole has traced the history of the cerebellum in psychology in relation tothe concept of the unconscious (see AE 1175:4). It is clear that currentresearch in neurophysiology and cognitive science confirms Swedenborg’sconclusions about the connection between the cerebellum and the affec-tive domain (voluntary; will; emotion; sensorimotor coordination; goal-directed behavior). I predict that future research in these fields will continueto confirm the results of Swedenborg’s methodology of correspondences,especially in its details.
For example, Swedenborg describes how the lungs respire throughblood directly from the heart as well as through blood from outside theheart (vena cava and aorta). This twofold respiration corresponds to howthe cognitive can be elevated to higher planes of functioning called “celes-tial.” This state is far above its normal functioning and corresponds to thelungs when respiring through blood not directly from the heart.
Swedenborg writes:
But as love that is of the will acts as one with the heart by correspondence,
and wisdom that is of the understanding acts as one with the lungs (as
has been shown above) therefore what has been said (in § 404) about
affection for truth, perception of truth, and thought, can nowhere be more
clearly seen and proved than in the lungs and the mechanism thereof.
These, therefore, shall be briefly described.
After birth, the heart discharges the blood from its right ventricle
into the lungs; and after passing through these it is emptied into the left
ventricle: thus the heart opens the lungs. This it does through the pulmo-
nary arteries and veins. The lungs have bronchial tubes which ramify,
and at length end in air-cells, into which the lungs admit the air, and thus
respire. Around the bronchial tubes and their ramifications there are also
193
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
arteries and veins called the bronchial, arising from the vena azygos or
vena cava, and from the aorta. These arteries and veins are distinct from
the pulmonary arteries and veins.
From this it is evident that the blood flows into the lungs by two
ways, and flows out from them by two ways. This enables the lungs to
respire non-synchronously with the heart. That the alternate movements
of the heart and the alternate movements of the lungs do not act as one is
well known. Now, inasmuch as there is a correspondence of the heart and
lungs with the will and understanding (as shown above), and inasmuch
as conjunction by correspondence is of such a nature that as one acts so
does the other, it can be seen by the flow of the blood out of the heart into
the lungs how the will flows into the understanding, and produces the
results mentioned just above (n. 404) respecting affection for and percep-
tion of truth, and respecting thought. By correspondence this and many
other things relating to the subject, which cannot be explained in a few
words, have been disclosed to me.
Whereas love or the will corresponds to the heart, and wisdom or the
understanding to the lungs, it follows that the blood vessels of the heart in
the lungs correspond to affections for truth, and the ramifications of the
bronchia of the lungs to perceptions and thoughts from those affections.
Whoever will trace out all the tissues of the lungs from these origins, and
disclose the analogy with the love of the will and the wisdom of the
understanding, will be able to see in a kind of image the things mentioned
above (n. 404), and thereby attain to a confirmed belief. But since a few
only are familiar with the anatomical details respecting the heart and
lungs, and since confirming a thing by what is unfamiliar induces obscu-
rity, I omit further demonstration of the analogy. (DLW 405)
By means of this correspondence many arcana relating to the will and
understanding, thus also to love and wisdom, may be disclosed. In the
world it is scarcely known what the will is or what love is, for the reason
that man is not able, by himself, to love, and from love to will, although
he is able as it were by himself to exercise intelligence and thought; just as
he is not able of himself to cause the heart to beat, although he is able of
himself to cause the lungs to respire.
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
194
Now because it is scarcely known in the world what the will is or
what love is, but it is known what the heart and the lungs are,—for these
are objects of sight and can be examined, and have been examined and
described by anatomists, while the will and the understanding are not
objects of sight, and cannot be so examined—therefore when it is known
that these correspond, and by correspondence act as one, many arcana
relating to the will and understanding may be disclosed that could not
otherwise be disclosed; those for instance relating to the conjunction of
the will with the understanding, and the reciprocal conjunction of the
understanding with the will; those relating to the conjunction of love with
wisdom, and the reciprocal conjunction of wisdom with love; also those
relating to the derivation of love into affections, and to the consociation of
affections, to their influx into perceptions and thoughts, and finally their
influx according to correspondence into the bodily acts and senses. These
and many other arcana may be both disclosed and illustrated by the
conjunction of the heart and lungs, and by the influx of the blood from the
heart into the lungs, and reciprocally from the lungs into the heart, and
therefrom through the arteries into all the members, organs and viscera of
the body. (DLW 385)
In other numbers Swedenborg goes into detail for each of these propo-sitions. For example, in numbers 390 and 391, he describes his experimentswith angels in which they gradually withdraw and restore the respirationof his lungs so he may observe directly the sequence of events which thedying go through. It is thus that in number 392 Swedenborg announces hisdiscovery of the cardiac and pulmonic movements of the brain individu-ally, and of societies generally, as the two universal movements imposedby everything from the action within their inmost of the spiritual Sun fromwhich they all have their origin. In number 397 Swedenborg reveals theexistence of “the divided mind,” that is, our ability to separate the affectiveand the cognitive states so that they no longer fully correspond to eachother, a state that disturbs their functioning and ultimately leads to totaldegradation and spiritual insanity, which lead to a life of fantasy anddelusion and irrationality in a frame of mind called hell or infernal.
Love or the will prepares all things in its own human form, that it may act
conjointly with wisdom or the understanding. We say, will and under-
195
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
standing, but it is to be carefully borne in mind that the will is the entire
man; for it is the will that, with the understanding, is in first principles in
the brains, and in derivatives in the body, consequently in the whole and
in every part (see above, n. 365-367). From this it can be seen that the will
is the entire man as regards his very form, both the general form and the
particular form of all parts; and that the understanding is its partner, as
the lungs are the partner of the heart. Beware of cherishing an idea of the
will as something separate from the human form, for it is that same form.
From this it can be seen not only how the will prepares a bridal
chamber for the understanding, but also how it prepares all things in its
house (which is the whole body) that it may act conjointly with the
understanding. This it prepares in such a way that as each and every
thing of the body is conjoined to the will, so is it conjoined to the under-
standing; in other words, that as each and everything of the body is
submissive to the will, so is it submissive to the understanding. How each
and every thing of the body is prepared for conjunction with the under-
standing as well as with the will, can be seen in the body only as in a
mirror or image, by the aid of anatomical knowledge, which shows how
all things in the body are so connected, that when the lungs respire each
and every thing in the entire body is moved by the respiration of the
lungs, and at the same time from the beating of the heart.
Anatomy shows that the heart is joined to the lungs through the
auricles, which are continued into the interiors of the lungs; also that all
the viscera of the entire body are joined through ligaments to the chamber
of the breast; and so joined that when the lungs respire, each and all
things, in general and in particular, partake of the respiratory motion.
Thus when the lungs are inflated, the ribs expand the thorax, the pleura is
dilated, and the diaphragm is stretched wide, and with these all the lower
parts of the body, which are connected with them by ligaments there-
from, receive some action through the pulmonic action; not to mention
further facts, lest those who have no knowledge of anatomy, on account
of their ignorance of its terms should be confused in regard to the subject.
Consult any skillful and discerning anatomist whether all things in the
entire body, from the breast down be not so bound together, that when
the lungs expand by respiration, each and all of them are moved to action
synchronous with the pulmonic action.
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
196
From all this the nature of the conjunction prepared by the will
between the understanding and each and every thing of the human form
is now evident. Only explore the connections well and scan them with an
anatomical eye; then, following the connections, consider their coopera-
tion with the breathing lungs and with the heart; and finally, in thought,
substitute for the lungs the understanding, and for the heart the will, and
you will see. (DLW 403)
In number 379 Swedenborg reveals that every individual receivesinflux that gives the cognitive organ the ability to perceive common senseby insight and is called “thinking from common perception.” This abilityallows every normally functioning individual from any society or educa-tional level to perceive and comprehend spiritual truths, that is, to be wise.Synchronously with the influx of common perception from within, there isa corresponding “efflux” from the senses to the brains and their tinycortical cells, each of which is like a brain unto itself, hence, made up ofbillions of substructures! At the edge between the finest substances ofnature in the cortical minibrain cell the first contact of correspondencebetween the spiritual and the natural takes place. The influx of commonperception from the spiritual brain encounters the efflux of sensory modu-lation stemming from seeing something or hearing an utterance. Therationality coming from the common perception through spiritual influxis thus synchronous to the physicality efflux associated with the sensorystimulus, giving rise to the consciousness of meaning and coherence.
6. All phenomena are human
This is the crowning premise of scientific dualism and, in my opinion,represents the deepest level of scientific revelation. Since deepest meanshighest in the Swedenborgian paradigm, the crowning affirmation fromwhich all other affirmations come is that only the human form exists. Thisis an astonishing revelation and makes the most ardent humanist appearmild in comparison. Just think: rocks, geometric shapes, stars, and at-oms—all are in the human form.
197
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
All phenomena are human because the law of providence and permis-sions restricts a phenomenon’s existence to its ability to serve a human endor purpose. Any substance, form, or function that does not have a humanpurpose, does not exist. Further, the purpose or end is synchronouslypresent in its cause, and through that in its effects, in accordance with thelaw of vertical degrees. Therefore every object and property in the naturaluniverse must have a human purpose and must have its interior structurein the human form (AC 3624-3649; SD 4775).
It is on this account that the cosmos has the shape of the human body,as witnessed by Swedenborg, and that a human being is a microcosmos, asspoken of by the ancients. The extent to which this is true in detail was notknown until Swedenborg’s revelations. For more than two decadesSwedenborg chronicled in his diary the daily excursions he experiencedinto the spiritual realm, the manner of his “travels” through those realms,and what he witnessed there. He gives a full account of his spiritualjourneyings in his twelve-volume Arcana Coelestia and in his six-volumeSpiritual Diary. He fully confirms that not only are the spiritual landmasses and regions in the human external shape, but also in the internalorgans of the body. In fact, Swedenborg used his expert knowledge ofanatomy and physiology (as in EAK, all 3 volumes) to localize himselfwithin the Grand Human, or spiritual land masses and oceans. He wouldrefer to his location as “in the province of the eye” or “in the province ofthe nose” and so on. About the latter, Swedenborg says:
Those however who relate to the interiors of the nostrils are in a more
perfect state of perception than those (just treated of) who relate to their
exteriors. (. . .) [2] Finally I observed a bright white light, and was told that
here were the abodes of those women who constitute the province of the
internal nostrils (for they were of the female sex); and that the clear-
sightedness of perception of those who are there, is represented in the
world of spirits by such apertures. For the spiritual things in heaven are
represented in the world of spirits by natural things, or rather by such
things as are similar to those which are in nature. It was afterwards given
me to speak with them, and they said that through these representative
apertures they can see with exactness what is being done below, and that
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
198
the apertures appear turned to those societies which they are occupied in
observing. And as they were then turned to me, they said that they could
observe all the ideas of my thought, and also those of the people around
me. They said moreover that they did not merely observe the ideas, but
also saw them represented in many ways, as for instance those of the
affection of good by correspondent little flames, and those of the affection
of truth by variations of light. They added that they saw certain angelic
societies with me, and their thoughts represented by objects of many
colors, by crimson dyes such as we see on painted curtains, and also by
the colors of the rainbow on a darker ground, and they said that they thus
perceived those angelic societies to be of the province of the eye.
[3] Afterwards other spirits were seen who were cast down from
thence and scattered about hither and thither, of whom they said that
they were such as had insinuated themselves among them for the pur-
pose of observing something, and of seeing what was going on below, but
with an insidious purpose. This casting down was observed whenever
angelic choirs approached and entered into conversation with me. As
regards those who were cast down, they said that they relate to the mucus
of the nostrils, and that they are dull and stupid, and also devoid of
conscience, thus altogether devoid of interior perception. The woman
who was seen (as mentioned above) signified such female ensnarers.
With these also it was given me to speak, and they expressed their
surprise at any one’s having conscience, being quite ignorant of what
conscience is; and when I said that it is an interior perception of what is
good and true, and that to act contrary to it causes anxiety, this they did
not understand. Such are those who correspond to the mucus which
infests the nostrils and is therefore ejected.
[4] There was afterwards shown me the kind of light in which those
live who relate to the interiors of the nostrils. It was a light beautifully
varied with veins of golden flame and silver light, the affections of good
being represented therein by the veins of golden flame, and the affections
of truth by the veins of silver light. I was also shown that they have
apertures opening at the side, through which they see as it were a sky
with stars in the blue, and I was told that in their chambers there is a light
so great as to immeasurably surpass the noonday light of this world. I
was further told that the heat there is like that of early summer on earth,
199
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
and also that these angels of the female sex are accompanied by little
children of some years who are unwilling to stay when the female ensnarers
(or mucuses) arrive. Numberless such representatives appear in the world
of spirits; but these were representative of the perceptions in which are
those female angels who correspond to the sense of smell in the interiors
of the nostrils. (AC 4627)
About the relation between anxiety and the stomach, Swedenborg notesthis:
As solicitude about things to come is what produces anxieties in man, and
as such spirits appear in the region of the stomach, therefore anxieties
affect the stomach more than the other viscera. It has also been given me
to perceive how these anxieties are increased and diminished by the
presence and removal of the spirits referred to. Some anxieties were
perceived interiorly, some more exteriorly, some more above, and some
more below, according to the difference of such solicitude as to origin,
derivation, and direction. It is for this reason also that when such anxi-
eties take possession of the mind, the region about the stomach is con-
stricted, and at times pain is felt there, and the anxieties also seem to rise
up from there; and hence also it is that when man is no longer solicitous
about the future, or when everything turns out well for him so that he no
longer is fearful of any misfortune, the region about the stomach is
relieved and expands, and he feels delight. (AC 5178)
A new scientific revelation [one about natural things] that is of deepsignificance to the medical sciences is that physiological processes aredependent on the corresponding synchronous action of spiritual societiesin the Grand Human regions. In the number just quoted there is therevelation that stomach ulcers are processes dependent on the activity ofspirits that dwell in the region of the stomach in the Grand Human regionsof the spiritual world. Further, it is revealed that activity by spirits in thestomach region of the Grand Human are felt through the mediation ofanxieties in physiological processes in our stomach. There is thus a corre-spondence between the mental quality of a society in the Grand Human,its anatomical location there, and the plane of our mind and region of our
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
200
body. Christen Blom-Dahl (1996) has collected many examples fromSwedenborg’s writings where a connection is indicated between anatomi-cal location or function on the one hand, and the mental quality of spiritualsocieties in the corresponding organ in the Grand Human. Blom-Dahl hasextracted several instances in which the mental quality of spirits is de-scribed in terms that have been independently used by medical research-ers in the identification and description of viruses that are organ- oraction-specific. According to Blom-Dahl many more such revelations liehidden in the Writings to be discovered by future generations.
Worcester (1931) has compiled many facts regarding spiritual-physi-ological correspondences found in Swedenborg. Spirits who live in thebile region are those who have despised spiritual and heavenly things (p.105) and those who are in the region of the liver produce in us a desire andcapacity to assimilate knowledge (p. 105). Those who live in the region ofthe kidneys and bladder are described by Swedenborg, as follows:
They who constitute the province of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder in
the Grand Human, are of such a disposition that they desire nothing more
than to explore and to search out the quality of others; and there are some
of them who are eager to chastise and to punish, provided there is some
justice in the case. The functions of the kidneys, ureters, and bladder are
of this kind; for they explore the blood thrown into them to see whether
there is any useless and hurtful serum in it, which they separate from
what is useful, and then correct it; for they drive it down toward lower
positions, and on the way and afterward they agitate it in various ways.
These are the functions of those who constitute the province of the parts
in question. But the spirits and societies of spirits to which the urine itself,
especially fetid urine, corresponds, are infernal; for as soon as the urine is
separated from the blood, although it is in the little tubes of the kidneys or
within the bladder, still it is out of the body; for what has been separated
no longer circulates in the body, and therefore does not contribute any-
thing to the coming into existence and subsistence of its parts. (AC 5381)
201
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
EXTRACTING DUALIST CONCEPTS FROMSWEDENBORG’S WRITINGS
Besides my published work on Swedenborg, there is a growing bodyof scientific work by a few other scientists who have overcome the aca-demic culture of resistance in their field by stepping into the new pool andmaking use of dualist concepts. Among those who have published theirviews in recent years I can mention a few I am familiar:
In the social sciences: Wilson Van Dusen, Eugene Taylor, Jane Williams-Hogan, Robert Larsen, Robert Kirven, Daniel Goodenough;
In the humanities: Ray Silverman, George Dole, David R. Simons, Williamand Lee Woofenden, Inge Jonsson, Lars Berquist;
In the biological and medical sciences: Linda S. Odhner, Allen Bedford,Horand K. Gutfeldt, Stephen Cole, Christen Blom-Dahl;
In the natural sciences: Ian Thompson, Herbert Dingle, Erland J. Brock,Gregory Baker, Gustaf Arrhenius.
Others will be found in the pages of The New Philosophy, as well aspublications by the Swedenborg Foundation and New Church organiza-tions and institutes around the world. An especially noteworthy publica-tion is the volume published in 1988 to mark the tricentennial of the birthof Swedenborg. Published by The Academy of the New Church in BrynAthyn, Pennsylvania, it was edited by Erland Brock with the assistance ofBruce Glenn, Carroll Odhner, J. Durban Odhner, Cynthia Walker, andJane Williams-Hogan.
Here is a table showing some of the dualist concepts for psychologyand biology that I extracted from Arcana Coelestia (AC) and Divine Provi-dence (DP). Similar extractions are possible from Swedenborg’s other works(see for example James and Nahl, 1982).
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
202
203
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
This listing represents a conceptual identification I was able to makebetween dualist science in Swedenborg and contemporary concepts inpsychology and social science. In the future, I intend to develop thetheoretical rationales that justify these identifications so that it may beconfirmed by consensus.
“IT IS NOT KNOWN“ REVEALED
Swedenborg uses the expression “it is not known that” hundreds oftimes in the twelve-volume Arcana Coelestia and the sixteen works follow-ing it (1747–1771). Other expressions indicating a similar meaning include:
• it is not yet known that . . .• be it known that . . .• that this is the case is an arcanum not known in the world.• it has hitherto remained unknown that . . .
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
204
• that will now be revealed for the first time.• that has not entered the mind of anyone until now.• no one can know that . . .• . . . yet the contrary is true.
If we were to add them all and analyze their content, it would give us adatabase of thousands of items of knowledge for future research anddevelopment in dualist science. Swedenborg marks these places explicitlyto show where the gap exists between material and dualist science. I took asample of these which will be found here. A preliminary analysis of a sub-sample of seventeen passages (or one-third of the original sample), pin-points the following dualist concepts that are “not known” in materialistscience:
1. Water corresponds to truthAE 71. As it is not yet known that “waters” in the Word signify thetruths of faith and the knowledges of truth, . . .
2. Natural life by itself is a state of sleepAE 187. Spiritual life is to moral life, apart from spiritual life, aswakefulness is to sleep, or as noonday light is to the evening, yea, todarkness. But that this is so is not known or perceived by those whoare in natural life alone . . .
3. Faith separate from charity does not saveAE 236. That those who are in the doctrine of faith alone and justifica-tion by faith are such, or believe themselves to be so, is not known tothose who are not in that faith, although they are among them; but thatstill they are so it has been given me to know by much experience.
4. Rock corresponds to God and to faith or truthAE 411. It is known in the church that this “rock” signified the Lord;but it is not known that it had this signification because “rock” in theWord signifies the Divine truth that proceeds from the Lord; this waswhy Moses and Aaron were commanded to speak to it, . . .
205
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
5. Good has primacy over truthAE 434. Because good has no quality until it is formed into truths, andwithout quality nothing is perceived, so it is not known that good isfirst, and is the first born; for it is good that is first conceived from theLord with man, and it is brought forth through truths, in which goodis in its own form and effigy.
6. Existence of the law of permissionsAE 638. For it is not known that to avert the evil of punishment wouldbe contrary to order, for if it were averted evil would increase untilthere would be no good remaining.
7. We are dual citizens: body in physical world, mind in spiritualworldAC 1889. The reason why this subject is not of easy explication, is thatat this day it is not known what the internal man is, what the interior,and what the exterior. When the rational is spoken of, or the rationalman, some idea can be formed of it; but when it is said that the rationalis the intermediate between the internal and the external, few if anycomprehend it.
8. Charity determines the faith one hasAC 2435. The cause of there being such a controversy was that it wasnot known, as even at this day it is not known, that a man has only somuch of faith as he has of charity; and that when a man is beingregenerated, charity presents itself to faith, or what is the same, goodpresents itself to truth, and insinuates itself into it and adapts itself toit in every particular, causing faith to be faith.
9. Existence of vertical community—we are never aloneAC 4062. Yet as it is not known, at least is not acknowledged at heart,that there are spirits and angels around man, and that his internal manis in the midst of them, and is thus ruled by the Lord, it is littlebelieved, although said.
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
206
10. Spiritual growth depends on living according to God’s precepts oneknowsDLW 248. It is not known that a natural man becomes spiritual by theopening of some higher degree in him, and that such opening iseffected by a spiritual life, which is a life conformed to the Divineprecepts; and that without a life conformed to these man remainsnatural.
11. In what way a person is a microcosmosDLW 319. By the ancients man was called a microcosm, from hisrepresenting the macrocosm, that is, the universe in its whole com-plex; but it is not known at the present day why man was so called bythe ancients, for no more of the universe or macrocosm is manifest inhim than that he derives nourishment and bodily life from its animaland vegetable kingdoms, and that he is kept in a living condition by itsheat, sees by its light, and hears and breathes by its atmospheres. Yetthese things do not make man a microcosm, as the universe with allthings thereof is a macrocosm. The ancients called man a microcosm,or little universe, from truth which they derived from the knowledgeof correspondences, in which the most ancient people were, and fromtheir communication with angels of heaven; for angels of heavenknow from the things which they see about them that all things of theuniverse, viewed as to uses, represent man as an image.
12. Will and understanding are distinctDLW 361. That every man has these two, will and understanding, andthat they are distinct from each other, as love and wisdom are distinct,is known and is not known in the world. It is known from commonperception, but it is not known from thought and still less fromthought when written out; for who does not know from commonperception that the will and the understanding are two distinct thingsin man?Additionally, “If you take away willing from understanding you un-derstand nothing” (DP 96)
207
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
13. Love does nothing without wisdomDP 4. Love apart from union with wisdom cannot do anything (n. 401–403). Love does nothing unless in conjunction with wisdom (n. 409,410). Spiritual heat and spiritual light, in proceeding from the Lord asa Sun, form one, as the Divine Love and the Divine Wisdom in theLord are one (n. 99–102). The truth of this proposition is evident fromwhat has been shown in these passages; but as it is not known howtwo things distinct from one another can act as one, I will here show.
14. What heaven isDP 27 [3]. Since, however, it is not known what heaven is in general,that is, in a community of persons, and what it is in particular, that is,in the individual; and what heaven is in the spiritual world and whatit is in the natural world; and yet it is important to know this, becauseheaven is the end of the Divine Providence, I will present this subjectwith some clearness in the following order.
15. How Divine Providence operatesDP 70. It is well known that there is a Divine Providence, but it is notknown what its nature is. This is not known because the laws of theDivine Providence are interior truths, hitherto concealed within thewisdom of the angels; but they are now to be revealed in order thatwhat belongs to the Lord may be ascribed to Him, and what does notbelong to man may not be ascribed to any man.
16. Natural mind sees nothing of the spiritualDP 205. It is not known that all who lead an evil life interiorly ac-knowledge nature and human prudence alone, because of this generalcovering by which it is hidden from view.
17. Evils come in bundlesDP 296. It is not known that in every evil there are innumerable things,exceeding in number the fibers and vessels in a man’s body. For awicked man is a hell in its least form; and hell consists of myriads ofmyriads of spirits, and every one there is in form like a man, althougha monstrous one, in which all the fibers and vessels are inverted.
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
208
SCIENTIFIC PUZZLES FOR DUALIST SCIENCE
Dualist science already exists in a universal form in the Writings ofSwedenborg. For the paradigm reversal to take place in actuality andhistorically, each academic and research discipline needs to prepare theintellectual climate by mining the Writings and extracting from them themethod and theory that is viable for that discipline. The initial phase mustbe taxonomic in which the concepts are built up and defined within thecontext of that discipline. Once there exists a viable conglomerate ofdualist concepts defined within a dualist taxonomy, we can proceed tophase two, which consists of hypothesis testing and theory building throughit. In this way dualist science can mature and begin to succeed in applica-tions and uses.
My taxonomic efforts in constructing dualist concepts for psychologycan be examined elsewhere (consult James references below). The table aboveis such an example, as well as the listing and categorizing of the passagesmarked as “this is not known” as discussed above. An additional methodof building the taxonomy of concepts needed for dualist science consists inmaking lists that identify dualist concepts given in the Writings that arepuzzling to our normal scientific reasoning, and thus, represent bridgingareas for crossing from monism to dualism. These concepts need to bejustified and discussed for the sake of arriving at a consensus, and I hopethis might be such a stimulus. The following concepts appear in manyplaces throughout the Writings (to be referenced exactly in the future), butespecially in Divine Love and Wisdom (DLW) and Divine Providence (DP).
1. The infinite is within the finite, not the other way around.
2. The simpler substances are more perfect (have more qualities and uses)than the compound, not the other way around.
3. The form of the whole, or largest, is fully contained within the small-est, and throughout, a principle called Synechdoche.
4. Perfection or complexity of structure increases as we observe anddescribe smaller and smaller objects.
209
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
5. We have no power of our own but enjoy continuous influx of it, momentby moment. (Also: We are most free—in feeling and in actuality—when we acknowledge and believe this proposition.)
6. We are born with the natural mind intact and the spiritual mind yet tobe opened through spiritual growth and effort. Until this opening we arenot human but animal. If this does not occur before death, we remainnatural forever, which is the life of insanity in hell.
7. It is not religious identification or faith that causes the opening of thespiritual mind, but our daily efforts at thinking and willing in accor-dance with the religious and moral precepts of life known to us (characterformation). Further: we must have a love for understanding truths offaith in order to become aware of their existence and use.
8. True faith is not blind but rational or scientific (dualist; Nunc licet—seeTCR 508). Blind faith, or faith by persuasion, is external and does nothave anything spiritual within it.
9. The parental-filial relationship is from charity, not blood, and does notsurvive in the spiritual state.
10. God is the one infinite in whom all things are distinctly one. The infiniteis thus single and can create all things from its own substance bycompounding this perfect substance and rendering it less and lessperfect as it approaches the natural mineral and gravitational state.Yet the infinite remains within the finite thus created (cf. propositions1 to 4 above).
11. God, or the One Infinite, is present in all things and in all space andtime through vertical degrees and governs all things through functionalinteractions called laws of correspondences. Thus, every thing thatexists is distinct and unique, and has a threefold structure—its exter-nal matter or energy that serves some potential use to humans, itsinterior quality or spirit (wisdom) that holds it in existence, and itsinmost quality or conatus that is from the substance of love (heat of thespiritual Sun). Every phase of successive development (etiology) is
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
210
fully present synchronously in the form of vertical degrees of causa-tion or determination.
12. The science of correspondences is a database of scientific revelationscontained in the Writings. Through a tabulation of the entire series ofcorrespondences given in the literal Latin text of the Writings we aregiven a scientific methodology for discovering the laws of Divinemanagement, that is, the laws of nature and spirit. Scientific theorybased on the science of correspondences will afford us greater controlover natural and psychological phenomena such as food production,education, and mental health.
13. Every object and process in the natural universe has the human form,including people, animals, atoms, and galaxies. This is because of theexistence of vertical degrees (see proposition 12 above).
14. Since regeneration, or the opening of the spiritual plane of the minddepends on character reformation (see proposition 7 above), we havea divided mind. Our cognitive functioning (i.e., thinking and reasoning)is capable of being elevated to spiritual light or perception (i.e., tounderstand spiritual things), while at the same time, our affectiveremains at the natural level of functioning. When we strive to love andlive by these spiritual truths, then we bring the affective in alignmentwith the cognitive, and thus we are no longer a divided mind (i.e., weare being regenerated). Those who pass on into the afterlife with adivided mind will have their cognitive lowered to their affective, thusrestoring unity to the person.
15. In the afterlife, people in hell freely choose to remain there; they are notkept there for punishment. If they visit heaven, they fall into internaltortures and swoonings. Thus, those in hell are spiritually adapted tolive in one delusion or another, in total insanity. The varieties ofinsanity in the hellish societies are as numerous as the varieties ofwisdoms in the heavenly societies, the two sets being related to eachother by specific opposition. Whether we are insane in hell or wise inheaven depends on the character we built for ourselves while in the
211
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
physical body—hence the vast importance of daily life in accordancewith good and truth, which is possible only if we shun our evils asspiritually injurious, a matter of heaven or hell. Thus, we need to livedaily life by calculating every choice we make in terms of our charac-ter building either for heaven or for hell. This kind of calculation alonemakes the spiritual life.
16. Evil is inherited in our personality traits and remains with us unless weput it aside through temptations. These are spiritual battles specifi-cally designed for each individual through life’s circumstances suchas good luck, bad luck, accidental events, unexplained success, inher-ent characteristics, favorable opportunities, chance associations, fate,the inevitable, and so on. Having a temptation means fighting for thegood and the true in the face of doubts and inherited lusts that try todestroy the spiritual or moral good and true in us, that is, our con-science. Overcoming in temptation is a victory whose consequence isopening of the spiritual functioning held shut by the presence in ourmind of the doubts and inherited lusts. By thousands of such indi-vidual victories and openings, our spiritual life is born and grows inpreparation for heavenly life.
17. The negative bias in science is a result of the purely natural thinking ofthe individual whose spiritual mind has not yet been opened. Incontrast, dualist science sees the relation between the natural and thespiritual. From this superior perspective, or reasoning process, onecan see the irrational concepts, or falsities, of the merely natural ormonist science. The following concepts from materialist or monistscience are marked as irrational by the Writings (the reason for theirfalsity is given in parentheses following each):
(a) That vacuum is the fabric of space (false since vacuum is nothingand nothing cannot be the basis of any thing).(b) That space and time are infinite (false since anything that has abeginning cannot be infinite; also: there can be only one infinite).(c) That the universe has continuous physical degrees only (falsesince in fact the physical is the outermost of the three verticaldegrees)
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
212
(d) That function can exist without its own substance, for example,that the brain gives rise to the mind or, that mental phenomena areemergent pseudo-phenomena arising from the brain (false since themind, or thoughts and feelings, are constituted of spiritual sub-stances and would be nothing without these)(e) That the evolution of the galaxies and of living species is blind,that is, is shaped by forces unrelated to human love and wisdom(false since all phenomena at the natural level have a prior spiritualcause, and this is from influx from the spiritual Sun which is loveand wisdom in substance)(f) The cognitive domain in human behavior is primary, the affectiveis secondary, for example, we think something, then we feel areaction (false since we could not think anything without first feel-ing something—thus, the cognitive is the outside form of the affec-tive that rules it from within)(g) That admittance to heaven depends on Divine forgiveness fromfaith alone or predestination from Divine favor (false since heaven isnot a place but a state of mind and this depends on the individual’scumulative life, not lack of Divine forgiveness)
213
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
CONCLUSION
In evaluating Swedenborg two verdicts stand out, depending onwhether or not you allow the concept of scientific revelation. Those whodo not allow the possibility of Divine revelation of facts about reality haveno logical choice but to conclude that Swedenborg was deranged anddelusional. This conclusion is forced on their minds because ofSwedenborg’s repeated and relentless claims that appear somewhat simi-lar to those of delusional minds: namely, that they talk to spirits generally,that they converse with people from the past like the Apostles, or theProphets, or men of history like Aristotle, Newton, Napoleon or some
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
214
other king or general, and so forth. Swedenborg has maintained theseclaims about himself not just once but has described in detail his dailyencounters with people who had lived on this planet and on many otherplanets and star systems. Finally, this one: that he spoke with Jesus or GodHimself, face to face. Given these claims there is no other logical choicethan to judge him insane—unless you accept the possibility of Divinerevelation about the natural world.
Those who do, only need to carefully examine Swedenborg’s writingsto determine whether this could be it! Many have since his passing on in1771. Here, it was my turn as a contemporary scientist operating aroundthe year 2000, to give an account of how I can modify the materialistic ormonistic science I practice professionally, so as to align it with the scien-tific revelations in Swedenborg. This new paradigm is what I call “dualistscience” and is based on “substantive dualism.” Swedenborg has pro-vided theory, methodology, and data for the new paradigm. There are notechnical or theoretical barriers left to inhibit the progress of dualism inscience.
Those who are in the New Church celebrate the advent of “rationalfaith” in the Writings of Swedenborg. To them the well known expression“Nunc licet” means the end of blind faith and persuasive faith whichprevent the opening of one’s rational and spiritual life:
[4] Since then, the dogmas of the present Christian churches have not
been formed from the Word, but from self-intelligence, and therefore
from falsities, and also have been confirmed by certain passages from the
Word; by the Lord’s Divine Providence the Word among the Roman
Catholics has been taken from the laity, and among Protestants has been
opened, and yet has been closed by their common declaration that the
understanding must be held in obedience to their faith.
[5] But in the New Church the contrary is the case; there it is permit-
ted to enter with the understanding and penetrate into all her secrets, and
to confirm them by the Word, because her doctrines are continuous truths
laid open by the Lord by means of the Word, and confirmations of these
truths by rational means cause the understanding to be opened above
more and more, and thus to be raised into the light in which the angels of
heaven are. That light in its essence is truth, and in that light acknowledg-
215
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
ment of the Lord as the God of heaven and earth shines in its glory. This is
what is meant by the inscription “Nunc Licet” over the door of the
temple, and also by the veil of the sanctuary before the cherub being
raised. For it is a canon of the New Church, that falsities close the
understanding, and that truths open it. (TCR 508)
To me, it also means the birth of dualist science. What is rational faith buta rational understanding of reality, of creation, of the laws of Divinemanagement and governance of every single phenomenon. The laws bywhich we are regenerated and grow to be spiritual beings are fixed,describable, and applicable to individual and society in all daily endeav-ors.
The Writings of Swedenborg are not only the Word of the SecondAdvent for the New Christian Church; they are also the database ofscientific revelations that give life and direction to the new dualist sci-ence—its theory and methodology for the third millennium. T
REFERENCES
Baker, Gregory L. Religion and Science: From Swedenborg to Chaotic Dynamics. New York: TheSolomon Press, 1992.
Blom-Dahl, Christen. The Third Source—Swedenborg: A Physical and Metaphysical Revelation.1996
Brock, Erland J. et. al. (editors). Swedenborg and His Influence. Bryn Athyn, PA: The Academyof the New Church, 1988.
Chomsky, Noam. Language and Mind. Video by Into the Classroom Media, Los Angeles, CA:1997. See also: Language and Mind, Boston: 1964.
Cole, Stephen D. “Swedenborg, Psychology, and the Cerebellum.” The New Philosophy 91 (Oct.–Dec. 1988): 529–543.
De Hemelsche Leer. (1930–38). The Hague, Holland: Swedenborg Genootschap. (Reprinted bythe Lord’s New Church, Bryn Athyn, PA).
Dingle, Herbert. Swedenborg as a Physical Scientist. London: Swedenborg Society, 1938.
Dole, George F. Sorting Things Out. San Francisco: J. Appleseed & Co., 1994
Emerson, Ralph W. (1849). Representative Men. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
Brock, Erland J. “New Church Epistemology.” Part VIII. The New Philosophy 91 (Oct.–Dec.1988): 683–695.
Gutfeldt, Horand K. “Domains of Materialism, Past and Present: Broadly Generalized Obser-vations of a History of Human Thought.” The New Philosophy 95 (Oct.–Dec. 1992): 3–4, 93–100.
THE NEW PHILOSOPHY, July–December 2001
216
James, Leon and Nahl, Diane. “The Coming Swedenborgian Revolution in the Social Sciencesand Humanities.” Logos: Newsletter of the Swedenborg Foundation. (Winter 1982).
James, Leon. “Two Perspectives on Swedenborg’s Writings: Secular and Religious” Part I. NewChurch Life 114 (August 1994): 348–362.
____________ . “Two Perspectives on Swedenborg’s Writings: Secular and Religious.” PartII. New Church Life 114 (Sept. 1994): 394–399.
____________ . “Do the Writings of Swedenborg Contain Scientific Revelations?” NewChurch Life 115 (April 1995): 154–163.
____________ . “The Reciprocal Relation Between Science and Revelation.” New Church Life115 (May 1995): 228–235.
____________ . “Dualist Science and the Writings of Swedenborg.” New Church Life 115 (June1995): 264–270.
____________ . (1996). “The Fourteen Scientific Fallacies in AC 5084: Implications for ScienceEducation.” The New Philosophy 99 (Oct.–Dec. 1996): 439–450.
____________ . See below for related articles available on the World Wide Web:www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy/leon.html
Johnson, John. (1994). “Henry Maudsley on Swedenborg’s messianic psychosis.” BritishJournal of Psychiatry 165 (1994): 690–691.
Kukla, A. (1983). “Toward a Science of Experience.” The Journal of Mind and Behavior 4:2 (Spring1983): 231–246.
Larsen, R. (editor). Emanuel Swedenborg: A Continuing Vision. New York: Swedenborg Founda-tion. 1988.
Simonetti Odhner, Linda. “The Bread of Life With Honey From the Rock: A Chaste Union ofReligion and Science.” New Church Life (1989): 117–122.
Simons, David R. (1989). “Philosophy of History: From a New Church Perspective.” The NewPhilosophy 92 (April–June 1989): 67–74.
Suzuki, D. T. “Swedenborg: Buddha of the North.” West Chester: Swedenborg Foundation,1996.
Swedenborg, Emanuel. (1742). Psychological Transactions. Reprinted Philadelphia, PA: Swe-denborg Scientific Association, 1955.
____________ . (1688–1772). For more information, see Swedenborg Foundation: Informa-tion Swedenborg Home Page; Swedenborg Scientific Association atwww.newphilosophyonline.org
Tafel, R. L. Documents Concerning the Life and Character of Emanuel Swedenborg. London:Swedenborg Society, 1875.
Talbot, Brian M. “Swedenborg’s alleged insanity.“ New-Church Magazine, London: GeneralConference of the New Church, London. 1997. See also The New Philosophy 101 (Jan–June1998): 9–220, for Talbot and others on Swedenborg’s mental state.
Taylor, Eugene. A Psychology of Spiritual Healing. Swedenborg Foundation: West Chester, PA,1997.
Thompson, Ian J. (Physics Department, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 5XH, U.K.)“Swedenborg and Modern Science.” Published in: Network Newsletter of The Scientific andMedical Network, 36 (1988): 3–8.
Trobridge, George M. Swedenborg: Life and Teaching. New York: Swedenborg Foundation, 1976.
217
SCIENTIFIC DUALISM
VanDusen, Wilson. The Presence of Other Worlds: The Psychological/Spiritual Findings of EmanuelSwedenborg. New York: Swedenborg Foundation, 1991.
Williams-Hogan, Jane K. (1988). “Swedenborg: A Biography.” In Brock et al. (1988), Swedenborgand His Influence. In addition to the article, includes the sections Swedenborg Chronology,Selected Bibliography, and General Reference Works.
____________ . (1998). “The Role of Written Text in the Founding of the SwedenborgianChurch.” Logos: Newsletter of the Swedenborg Foundation (Winter 1998).
Worcester, John. (1889). Physiological Correspondences. Boston: Massachusetts New ChurchUnion 1931. (Reprinted in 1976 and 1987 by the Swedenborg Scientific Association, BrynAthyn, PA.)