Version 3 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Margins of Error
Personalised Support
services for disabled
people: What can we
learn?
Version 3 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Version 3 | Internal use only Learning from the Right to Control Trailblazers:
Helping disabled people exercise choice and
control over their support
Claire Lambert , Ipsos MORI September 2013
Version 3 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
What is the Right to Control?
• The Right to Control gives disabled adults the legal
right to exercise choice and control over certain
public funding they may receive.
• It covers 6 funding streams:
–Adult Social Care
–Supporting People
–Disabled Facilities Grant
–Access to Work
–Work Choice
–Independent Living Fund
Version 3 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
What is the Right to Control?
Under the Right to Control, disabled people can:
• Receive the support the public body would have provided
before the Right to Control
• Ask the public body to arrange alternative support on
their behalf
• Receive a direct payment and arrange their own
support
• Have a mix of these arrangements
Version 3 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
What is the Right to Control?
• For people eligible for more than one funding stream,
the Right to Control also aims to streamline the
customer journey (avoid duplication in assessment,
support planning and review).
• Tested in seven Trailblazers: Barnet, Essex,
Leicester, Manchester Area Partnership, Newham,
Sheffield and Barnsley, Surrey.
• All new clients have the Right to Control (for the
ILF it is all clients on review).
• Initially for a period of 2 years, starting December
2010, then extended to December 2013
Version 3 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
The evaluation had 3 components
Process study to look at delivery and
implementation
• 2 waves of qualitative interviews with disabled people, carers, staff, providers and ULOs (315 interviews)
Impact study to measure impact of the RtC on clients’
outcomes
• Survey of RtC clients and a comparison group (3,282 interviews) in Autumn 2012
Economic impact analysis
• Measuring the costs and benefits of the RtC
• Break-even analysis
Input from evaluation co-production group and steering group throughout
Version 3 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Why is the Right to Control important?
‘Although people welcome choice in the
services they use, there is a minority of
people who are excluded from these benefits,
often because they lack the confidence,
information, or the advice they need’
David Boyle, The Barriers to Choice Review
Version 3 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
59% 22%
8%
5% 4%
1%
Q7. “It is important to have a choice of (service)”
Having a choice seen as important across services
Source: Ipsos MORI
Strongly agree
Neither/Nor
Strongly disagree
Service
School
Social
care
Hospital
GP
surgery
Agree 94% 83% 77% 80%
Disagree 3% 7% 11% 11% Tend to agree
Tend to disagree
Base: All those who have changed/used service (1,485), 2012
81%
9%
Version 3 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
46%
51%
3%
Q6. Did you select the school/provider of support or social care services/GPs
surgery/hospital from a number of options or was there no choice at all?
But choice of service is limited in social care…
Source: Ipsos MORI
Yes – selected from a number of options
No choice
Choice by service
School Social
care
Hospital GP
surgery
Yes 83% 27% 35% 57%
No choice 15% 65% 63% 41%
Don’t
know
2% 9% 2% 2%
Don’t know
Base: All those who have changed/used service (1,485), 2012
Version 3 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
7% 8%
9%
24%
51%
1%
Q7. “It was difficult to make a choice of (service)”
…and more difficult to make
Source: Ipsos MORI
Strongly agree
Neither/Nor
Strongly disagree
Service
School Social
care
Hospital GP
surgery
Agree 22% 41% 6% 13%
Disagree 71% 44% 82% 78%
Tend to agree
Tend to disagree
Base: All those who selected their service from a number of options (728), 2012
15%
75%
Version 3 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Some examples of
impact reported by RtC clients
Better value for money if
direct payments
Choice is a pleasant
surprise, even if not used
Feeling empowered
Growing confidence
Sacking bad care providers
More flexibility to change support
Better support
Better relationships
with paid carers
Getting back into paid
employment
Exercising the RtC is beneficial for disabled people
Version 3 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
But few disabled people exercised their right
Looking back at the four options available to people under
the Right to Control, most chose the first one:
• Receive the support the public body would have
provided before the Right to Control
• Ask the public body to arrange alternative support on
their behalf
• Receive a direct payment and arrange their own support
• Have a mix of these arrangements
Version 3 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Meaningful choice of providers or support
Information to make confident choices
Help in managing their support
Knowing they could
request changes
Four conditions need to be met
Conditions needed before disabled people
could exercise their Right to Control successfully
Version 3 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Helping disabled people exercise choice over
their support
Disabled people need to be told that they can have
choice over their support, that they can request a
change of provider, or a review.
Timings matter.
Knowing they
could request
changes
Provide practical examples of how other disabled people
have exercised choice or used direct payments
Provide information about providers available locally, what
they offer, ballpark quotes, and feedback from other users
Information to
make
confident
choices
Version 3 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Helping disabled people exercise choice over
their support
Third-party support needed to help disabled people deal
with the administrative and legal aspects of direct payments.
Ensure they can ‘ask the public body to arrange
alternative support on their behalf’.
Managing their
support
Choice over equipment and adaptations in DFG, Access
to Work
Choice of providers – in particular for people with complex
needs, and people in rural areas.
Look at how people may be able to pool budget across
funding streams
Meaningful
choice of
support and/or
providers
Version 3 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Developing the provider market
• To offer choice to disabled people, Trailblazers had to
move away from block contracts or framework
agreements. This sometimes meant terminating
contracts early or renegotiating them, and widening
the providers’ offer
• Large, well established providers were less willing to
change their offer
• Developing the provider market is a slow process and
very time consuming
• Nonetheless, Trailblazers had made various efforts to
stimulate the market
Online search tools in Barnet and Bury
to link disabled people to new
providers
New commissioning
staff dedicated to liaising with providers
Drawing up alternative provider
lists for delivery staff to offer to
disabled people
Version 3 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
“The ability to make that happen may take 10 years though because the market has to change. The block contracts that we’re uncoupling from in social care and Supporting People, the way DWP commissions and has a prime provider, that would need unpicking.”
Strategic staff
“A lot of these small providers, they’ve got a real passion about helping these customers. I phoned someone up and I told them about the RtC coming out in a couple of weeks’ time, and when I went to see them two weeks later they’d produced leaflets, support plans and business plans.”
Commissioning staff
Version 3 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Things that help make a good support plan
Instil a sense of progress over time
Think creatively, beyond standard
provision
Consider mainstream
services as well as disability services
Involve ULOs/peer support workers
Speak to other family members to
get a good understanding
Understand the person’s life and
aspirations
Support planning is key to facilitate culture change
Version 3 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
“They were really good with me, asking questions, finding out what I wanted to do, because what I do is quite specialised. It was time consuming, but it was worthwhile.”
Work Choice client
“It’s something I could always look back and think, yeah, that’s what I’m doing it for. I need things to jog my memory, especially when I hit a low patch … .”
Client for SP, DFG and ASC
Version 3 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
…and so is ULO involvement
• A more neutral place for disabled people to start
discussing employment than Jobcentre Plus
• More creative/tailored support plans that better meet
disabled people’s needs (but they may not get approved)
• Good understanding of the local provider market
• Easy access to informal feedback from disabled people
about local providers
• Can bridge gaps between funding streams that are not
used to working together
• Can help speed up the culture change among staff and
disabled people
Version 3 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
“DEAs, quite regularly some of them, would come in and ask us for advice. ‘We’re going to see someone tomorrow, what do you suggest is best for them?’ And that’s good.”
Local co-production team member
“The questions that we get from different staff now are more positive questions. They’re not carrying assumptions that disabled people can’t, they’re asking us how disabled people can, and what needs to be put into place.”
Local co-production team member
Version 3 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Summing up
• Four conditions need to be met to help disabled people
exercise choice and control over their support:
– offering them a meaningful choice of provider or support;
– providing information to help them make confident choices;
– offering them help to manage their support; and
– making sure they know they can ask for changes to their support.
• Work toward these is already well underway in the
Trailblazers and elsewhere, but some of these are long-
term goals and will take time, leadership and a sustained
commitment from all those involved.
Version 3 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
More details on the evaluation report
• http://odi.dwp.gov.uk/odi-
projects/right-to-control-
trailblazers/research-and-
statistics.php
Version 3 | Internal use only © Ipsos MORI
Version 3 | Internal use only
Thank you