Transcript
Page 1: Phonetic vs. Phonological Considerations in Inter ...d-scholarship.pitt.edu/26718/1/tse_h_2016_lsa_poster...1 7 X 30 = 510 tokens relevant for analysis 6 X 510 = 3060 vowel tokens

Phoneticvs.Phonological Considerations inInter-Generational VowelChangeinTorontoHeritage Cantonese

8) Next Steps

7) Discussion

5) Methodology

6) Results

2) Question: What about Toronto HCAN speakers?

3) DataHLVCProject (Nagy2011)•SociolinguisticInterviews (~1hourlong)•EthnicOrientationQuestionnaire•WordList(basedonpicturenamingtask)

4) Speaker Information

STEP 1:F1andF2measurementsof6vowels(/y/,/u/, /i/, /ɛ/,/ɔ/, /a/)acrosstwophoneticcontexts(openvs.closedsyllable)usingPRAAT (Boersma &Weenik 2015)

• /u/vs. /y/contrast maintained for allspeakers• Sexeffect foundfor /y/ only(backing among females)• Age effectfound for both vowels(backing of bothamong youngest speakers)• à doesnotshow phoneticassimilation between CAN/u/and TOENG /u/• Non-significant factors: GEN, EOQ, Syllable Type, Tone• Supports findings from Chang etal (2011)• à HL bilingualsmaintain language-internal distinctions

Short-TermGoals•Measureall8monophthongs•Largerspeakersamplesize andmorevoweltokens

Long-TermGoals•CompareHCANandTOENGvowelspaceusingCinC (Contactin theCity)data(Hoffman&Walker2010)•CompareTorontoandHKCAN vowelspace

Boersma, Paul.;and David Weenink.2015.Praat:doingphoneticsbycomputer[Computerprogram].http://www.praat.org/.Chang, CharlesB.;Yao Yao.; ErinF.Haynes.;and Russell Rhodes.2011.ProductionofphoneticandphonologicalcontrastbyheritagespeakersofMandarin. TheJournalof theAcousticalSocietyofAmerica129.3964–3980.doi:10.1121/1.3569736.Cui,Naomi.;Minyi Zhu.;VinaLaw.;Holman Tse.;and NaomiNagy.2014.Exploringautomatedformantanalysisforcomparativevariationist studyof HeritageCantoneseandEnglish. Presentationat ChangeandVariationinCanada(CVC8).Queen’sUniversity,Kingston,ON,Canada.http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/26261/.Fabricius, AnneH.;DominicWatt.;and DanielEzraJohnson.2009.Acomparisonof threespeaker- intrinsicvowelformantfrequencynormalizationalgorithmsforsociophonetics. LanguageVariationandChange21.413–435.doi:10.1017/S0954394509990160.Hoffman,Michol F.;andJamesA.Walker.2010.Ethnolects andthecity:EthnicorientationandlinguisticvariationinTorontoEnglish.LanguageVariationandChange22.37–67.doi:10.1017/S0954394509990238.Johnson,DanielEzra.2009.Gettingoff theGoldVarbStandard:IntroducingRbrul forMixed-EffectsVariableRuleAnalysis. LanguageandLinguisticsCompass 3.359–383.Nagy, Naomi.2011.AMultilingualCorpustoExploreVariationinLanguageContactSituations.Rassegna Italianadi LinguisticaApplicata 43.65–84.Thomas, Erik.; and Tyler Kendall.2007.NORM:Thevowelnormalizationandplottingsuite.http://ncslaap.lib.ncsu.edu/tools/norm/.

9) References

1) Introduction

CANBackground

ENGBackground

DemographicCharacteristics

Male Female Totals

GEN 1 CANdominant Variable Born &raised inHK,livedinGTA for> 20years

4(ages: 46-62)

5(ages: 50-82)

=9

GEN 2 Proficientenough forsociolinguisticinterview

ENG dominant Born &raised inGTA (or livedinGTAsinceage 3)

3(ages: 21-44)

5(ages: 16-21)

=8

=7 = 10 N=17

Vowel OpenSyllable

ClosedSyllable

SpeakerTotals

/y/ 10 5 =15/u/ 5 10 =15

=15 =15 N=3017X30=510tokensrelevantfor analysis6X510=3060voweltokensmeasured

10) Acknowledgements

STEP 2:Watt& FabriciusModifiedMethod (Fabricius,Watt,andJohnson2009)fornormalizationof3060tokensusingNORM

STEP 3:MixedEffectsModeling usingR-brul (Johnson2009)

Dependent Variable

F2

IndependentVariables

FixedEffectsSocial: GEN, Sex, Age, EOQLinguistic: Syllable Type, Tone

Random EffectsSpeaker, Word

English-Mandarin Bilingual Speakerscompared (Changetal. 2011)

HK Hong KongGTA Greater Toronto AreaHL Heritage Language (acquired aschild)L2 Second Language (acquired asadult)

(H)CAN (Heritage) Cantonese(TO)ENG (TO)ENG: Toronto EnglishGEN 1 Generation 1speakersGEN 2 Generation 2speakersEOQ Ethnic Orientation Questionnaire Scores

Poster # 13

Language Contact in the Mind and in the Community: Insights from Bilingual Phonetics and PhonologyLinguistic Society of America Annual Meeting, January 8, 2016, Washington, DC

Holman Tse ([email protected]), Dept. of Linguistics, Univ. of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260

Youngest speakers most retractedYoungest and femalespeakers mostretracted

HERITAGE LANGUAGE VARIATIONAND CHANGE IN TORONTO

HTTP://PROJECTS.CHASS.UTORONTO.CA/NGN/HLVC

uuyL2Mandarin

DistinctbutwithENGphonetic influence

yHLMandarin

Phonological considerationsinhibit fronting

uTOENG

GEN2HLspeakers (Cuietal.2014)

uyHCAN???

??? ???

多謝晒!

Naomi Nagy, Scott Kiesling, ShelomeGooden, HLVC Cantonese RA's: Abigail Chan, Karen Chan, Viv ian Chow, Naomi Cui, Tiffany Chung, Radu Craioveanu, Joyce Fok, Vina Law, Samuel Lo, Grace Lui, Rita Pang, Andrew Peters, Mario So Gao, Josephine Tong, Sarah Truong, Elaine Wang, Ka-man Wong, Alfred Wu, Oliv ia Yu, MinyiZhu

uy

(ThomasandKendall2007)

Age (p<0.01)**Coefficient

+1 2.391

Sex(p <0.01)**Coeff. N Mean (Hz)

M 56.148 105 1808F -56.148 150 1682

Age (p<0.01)**Coefficient

+1 3.237

Cantoneseisthe2ndmostwidelyspokenlanguageinToronto

y u Distinct for all speakers(p=8.77X10-22)***

Top Related