Download - Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
1/54
Projects Analysis and Implementations
Introduction
Project management is the discipline of planning, organizing and managing resources to
bring about the successful completion of specific project goals and objectives.
A project is a finite endeavor (having specific start and completion dates) undertaken to
create a unique product or service which brings about beneficial change or added value. This
finite characteristic of projects stands in sharp contrast to processes, or operations, which are
permanent or semi-permanent functional work to repetitively produce the same product or
service.
Project is an organised programme of activity carried out to reach a defined goal, often of a
non-recurring nature. It is a package of time-bound, scheduled and assembled activities
dedicated to the attainment of a specific activities of successful completion of a work on time
and within the allotted budget.
The primary challenge of project management is to achieve all of the project goals and
objectives while honoring the project constraints. Typical constraints are scope, time and
budget.
As a discipline, Project Management developed from different fields of application including
construction, engineering and defense. In the United States, the two forefathers of project
management are Henry Gantt, called the father of planning and control techniques, who isfamously known for his use of the Gantt chart as a project management tool, and Henry Fayol
for his creation of the 6 management functions, which form the basis for the body of
knowledge associated with project and program management.
Characteristics of a project
A project has a mission or a set of objectives.
A project has to terminate at some time or other.
All project has a life cycle represented by growth maturity and decline.
A project is a unique and no two projects are similar
A project is a customer specific.
A project is exposed to risk and uncertainty and the extent of these two depend uponhow the project moves through the various stages in its life span.
A substantial portion of work in a project is done by sub-contracting.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engineeringhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_(military)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Gantthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gantt_charthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Fayolhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engineeringhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_(military)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Gantthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gantt_charthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Fayol -
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
2/54
Project classifications
1 Quantifiable and Non Quantifiable projects.
Quantifiable: Industrial development, power generation, mining etc.
Non Quantifiable: Health education and defence etc.
2 Sectoral projects.
Agriculture and allied sector
Irrigation and power sector
Industry and mining sector
Transport and communication sector
Social services sector
Miscellaneous.
Financial Institutions classifications.
(Based on National and state financial Institutions)
New projects
Expansion Projects
Modernization Projects Diversification Projects.
Project Life Cycle/ Project development stages
Traditionally, project development includes a number of elements: four to five stages, and a
control system. Regardless of the methodology used, the project development process will
have the same major stages:
Initiation,
Planning or development,
Production or execution,
Monitoring and controlling, and
Closing.
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
3/54
Initiation
The initiation stage determines the nature and scope of the development. If this stage is not
performed well, it is unlikely that the project will be successful in meeting the businesss
needs. The key project controls needed here are an understanding of the business
environment and making sure that all necessary controls are incorporated into the project.
Any deficiencies should be reported and a recommendation should be made to fix them.
The initiation stage should include a cohesive plan that encompasses the following
areas:
Study analyzing the business needs in measurable goals.
Review of the current operations.
Conceptual design of the operation of the final product. Equipment and contracting requirements.
Financial analysis of the costs and benefits including a budget.
Stakeholder analysis, including users, and support personnel for the project.
Project charterincluding costs, tasks, deliverables, and schedule.
Planning and design
After the initiation stage, the system is designed. Occasionally, a small prototype of the final
product is built and tested. Testing is generally performed by a combination of testers and end
users, and can occur after the prototype is built or concurrently. Controls should be in place
that ensure that the final product will meet the specifications of the project charter.
The results of the design stage should include a product design that:
Satisfies the project sponsor, end user, and business requirements.
Functions as it was intended.
Can be produced within quality standards.
Can be produced within time and budget constraints.
Executing
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Business_needs&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_operationshttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conceptual_design&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Contracting_requirements&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_analysishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budgethttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stakeholder_analysishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_charterhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Business_needs&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_operationshttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conceptual_design&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Contracting_requirements&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_analysishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budgethttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stakeholder_analysishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_charter -
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
4/54
Executing consists of the processes used to complete the work defined in the project
management plan to accomplish the project's requirements. Execution process involves
coordinating people and resources, as well as integrating and performing the activities of the
project in accordance with the project management plan. The deliverables are produced as
outputs from the processes performed as defined in the project management plan.
Monitoring and Controlling
Monitoring and Controlling consists of those processes performed to observe project
execution so that potential problems can be identified in a timely manner and corrective action
can be taken, when necessary, to control the execution of the project. The key benefit is that
project performance is observed and measured regularly to identify variances from the project
management plan.
Monitoring and Controlling includes:
Measuring the ongoing project activities (where we are);
Monitoring the project variables (cost, effort, ...) against the project management plan
and the project performance baseline (where we should be);
Identify corrective actions to properly address issues and risks (How can we get on
track again);
Influencing the factors that could circumvent integrated change control so only
approved changes are implemented
Closing/ Project clean up
Closing includes the formal acceptance of the project and the ending thereof. Administrative
activities include the archiving of the files and documenting lessons learned.
Closing phase consist of two parts:
Close project: to finalize all activities across all of the process groups to formally closethe project or a project phase
Contract closure: necessary for completing and settling each contract, including the
resolution of any open items, and closing each contract applicable to the project or a projectphase.
Phases of a Project /Capital Budgeting
Planning
Analysis
Selecting
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
5/54
Financing
Implementation
Review1.Planning
It is a Preliminary screening of the project proposal. It is done to Assess whether the project is
worthwhile
2.Analysis
Market Analysis Demand, Market share
Technical Analysis technical viability production process, m/c, plant size
Financial Analysis Risk and Return, meet the debt and return expectations?
Economic Social cost benefit analysis, impact on income, savings and investment in
the society
Ecological Damage and corrective actions
3. Selection
It Involves risk analysis with the tools and techniques for risk analysis. Appraisal tools used
includes.
Non Discounting Pay Back Period and ARR
Discounting NPV, IRR and BCR
4. Financing
Capital structure decision Debt and Equity
Flexibility, risk, income, control and taxes influence the capital structure decision
5. Implementation
Designing, Construction, Training and Plant Commissioning
PERT and CPM are used for effective implementation
6.Review
Feedback
Provides information for future decision making
Suggest corrective actions
Judgmental biases can be discovered
Generation & screening of Project ideas
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
6/54
Search for promising project ideas is the first step towards establishing a successful venture.
Barring few new ideas based on technological breakthroughs, most of the project ideas
involve combining existing fields of technology or offering variants of present products or
services.
Generations of Ideas
To stimulate the flow of ideas, the followings are helpful.
SWOT analysis identifying opportunities that can be profitably exploited.
Clear articulation of objectives- Helps the employees to think more imaginatively.
Fostering a conducive climate- helps to tap the creativity of the employees.
Monitoring the environment
A promising investment idea enables a firm to exploit the opportunities in the
environment by drawing on its competitive strengths. Hence the firm must systematically
monitor the environment and assess its competitive abilities.
Business environment may be divided into 6 categories.
Economic sector
Governmental sector
Technological sector
Socio-demographic sector
Competition sector
Supplier sector.
Scouting for project ideas.
Wide variety of sources to be tapped to identify project ideas.
Analyse the performance of existing industries.
Examining the input and out put of various industries.
Review of imports and exports.
Study plan outlays and governmental guidelines.
Suggestions from financial institutions and developmental agencies.
Investigating local material and resources.
Analysis of economical and social trends. Study of new technological developments.
Clues from consumption abroad.
Possibility of revive of sick units.
Trade fairs.
Stimulating creativity for generating new product ideas.
Preliminary screening
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
7/54
From the list of ideas generated, some kind of preliminary screening is required to eliminate
which prima facie not promising. Preliminary screening is based on the following.
Compatibility with the promoter.
Consistency with government priorities.
Availability of inputs.
Adequacy of markets.
Reasonableness of cost.
Acceptability of risk level.
Facets of Project Analysis
Market/ Demand analysis.
Technical Analysis.
Financial analysis.
Economic analysis.
Ecological analysis.
1.Market and Demand analysis
Market analysis is concerned with
Find out the aggregate demand
Aggregate market share
Kinds of information required
Past and present consumption level
Past and present supply condition
Production possibilities and constraints
Imports and exports
Structure of competition
Cost structure
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
8/54
Elasticity of demand
Consumer behavior, intentions, preferences
Distribution and marketing policies in use
Administrative, technical and legal constraints.
1. Situational Analysis
Informal talk with customers, competitors, middlemen and others in the industry.
Situational Analysis is done when
- there is cost and time constraints
- the analysis generates enough data to measure the market
2.Collection of Secondary information
Sources Census of India, National Sample survey reports, annual survey of
industries etc..
Evaluate the secondary information
Examine the reliability, accuracy and relevance
3 Conduct Market Survey
Information sought in a market survey
Total Demand and rate of growth
Income and price elasticities of demand
Motives for buying
Satisfaction with existing products
Unsatisfied needs
Socio-economic characteristics of buyers
Attitude towards various products
Types of surveys includes
(1) Census Survey
For goods which are used by a small no. of firms. Costly and infeasible in other cases
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
9/54
(2) Steps in Sample survey
Define the target population
Select the sampling scheme and size
Develop questionnaire
Recruit and train the field investigators
Obtain information as per the questionnaire
Scrutinise the information
Analyse and interpret the information
4. Charaterisation of Market
Based on information gathered from secondary sources and through the market survey, the
market for the product/service may be described in terms of the following
Effective demand in the past and present
Breakdown of Demand
Price
Methods of Distribution and sales promotion
Consumers
Supply and competition
Govt. policy
5. Demand Forecasting
(a) Qualitative methods
(1) Jury of executive method
(2) Delphi method
(b) Quantitative methods
(1) Trend projection method
(2) Exponential smoothing method(3) Moving Average method
(4) Chain ratio method
(5) Consumption level method
(6) End use method
(7) Leading indicator method
Techniques of Demand Forecasting
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
10/54
(a) Qualitative methods
(1) Jury of executive method-
opinions of a group of managers
(2) Delphi method Taking the opinions of a group of experts with the help of a mail
survey.
6.Market Planning
Market analysis includes analyzing current Market situation which includes competitive,
distribution and macro environment. Market analysis calls for SWOT analysis of the
organization.
Objectives
Marketing strategy target segment, product positioning, product line, distribution,sales force, sales promotion and advertising
Action Programme
Technical Analysis
Analysis of technical and engineering aspects of a project need to be done continually when a
project is formulated. TA seeks to determine whether the prerequisite for the successful
commissioning of the project have been considered and reasonably good choice have beenmade with respect to location, size, process, etc.
Objective of Technical Analysis is to make sure that the project is technically feasible, Project
is optimal in terms of technology, size, location etc..
Essentials of Technical Analysis
Manufacturing Process / Technology
-choice of suitable technology among the alternatives
- Technology appropriate to local economic, social and cultural conditions.
Flexibility with respect to product mix.
Plant capacity- considering technological reqmt, input constraints, investment cost,
market conditions
Location and site - proximity to RM, infrastructure, labour, govt. policy etc.
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
11/54
Machineries and Equipment depending on the production technolgy, plant capacity,
investment capacity, workers able to operate etc..
Structures and Civil works site preparation and development, building and structures,
outdoor works etc..
Environmental Aspects types of emissions, action for effluent treatment.
Project charts and layouts to define scope of the project and provide basis for project
engineering and estimation of the investment and production cost.
Schedule of project implementation
- PERT & CPM Analysis
- Prepare work schedule
Financial Analysis
Financial analysis seeks to ascertain whether the proposed project will be financially viable inthe sense of being able to meet the burden of servicing the debt and whether the proposed
project will satisfy the return expectations of those who provide the capital.
Factors looked into while conducting the financial analysis are
Investment outlay and cost of project
Means of financing
Cost of capital
Projected profitability Break even point
Cash flows of the project
Projected financial position
Level of risk.
Financial Analysis
Make financial estimates and projections by analyzing
Cost of the project supported by long term funds Plan the means of financing considering cost, risk, control & flexibility
Estimate of sales & production ( qty & value)
Calculate the cost of productions matl, utilities, labour, factory o/h etc.
Financial Analysis
Working Capital requirement and the means of financing
Make profitability projections
Prepare a projected cash flow statement
Prepare a projected Balance Sheet
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
12/54
Economic analysis
EA also referred to as social cost benefit analysis, is concerned with judging a project from
the larger social point of view. In this evaluation focus is on the social cost and benefit of a
project which may often be different from its monetary costs and benefit.
The questions sought to be naswered in this analysis are.
What would be the impact of project on the distribution of the income in the society.
What would be the contribution of the project on employment, social order, savings and
investments etc.
Ecological analysis
Environmental concerns have assumed greater significance.
Mainly for those projects which have significant ecological implications.
Analysis of likely damage caused by the project to the environment.
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
13/54
Mod 2
PROJECT ESTIMATION AND SELECTION
NATURE OF INVESTMENT DECISIONS
From the above discussion, you must be clear about the distinctive features of capital
investment:
They have long-term consequences
They often involve substantial outlays
They may be difficult or expensive to reverse
Now that you know the nature of investment decisions, lets discuss the various forms ofinvestment decisions:
1. Replacement projects: Firms routinely invest in equipments meant to replace obsolete
and inefficient equipments, even though they may in serviceable condition. The
objective of such investments is to reduce costs (of labour, raw material, and power),
increase yield, and improve quality. Replacement projects can be evaluated in a fairly
straightforward manner; though at times the analysis may be quite detailed.
2. Expansion projects: These investments are meant to increase capacity and/ or widen
the distribution network. Such investments call for an explicit forecast of growth. Since,this can be risky and complex, expansion projects normally warrant more careful
analysis than replacement projects. Decisions relating to such projects are taken by
the top management.
3. Diversification projects: These investments are aimed at producing new products or
services or entering into entirely new geographical areas. Often diversification projects
entail substantial risks, involve large outlays, and require considerable managerial
efforts and attention. Given their strategic importance, such projects call for a very
thorough evaluation, both quantitative and qualitative. Further, they require a
significant involvement of the board of directors.
4. Research and development projects: Traditionally, R%D projects absorbed a very
small proportion of capital budget in most Indian companies. Things however are
changing. Companies are now allocating more funds to R&D projects, more so in
knowledge intensive industries. R&D projects are characterised by numerous
uncertainties and typically involve sequential decision-making. Hence the standard
DCF analysis is not applicable to them. Such projects are decided on the basis of
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
14/54
managerial judgment. Firms, which rely more on quantitative methods, use decision
tree analysis and option analysis to evaluate R&D projects.
5. Mandatory investments: These are expenditure required to comply with statutory
requirements. e.g., pollution control equipment, medical dispensary, fire fitting
equipment etc. These are often non-revenue producing investments. In analysing such
investments the focus is mainly on finding the most cost-effective way of fulfilling a
given statutory need.
ACCEPT-REJECT VERSUS RANKING APPROACHES
Two basic approaches to capital budgeting decisions are available. The accept- reject
approach involves evaluating capital expenditure proposals to determine whether they meet
the firms minimum acceptance criterion. This approach can be used then the firm has
unlimited funds, as a preliminary step when evaluating mutually exclusive projects, or in a
situation in which capital must be rationed. In these cases only the acceptable projects shouldbe considered.
The second method, the ranking approach, involves ranking projects on the basis of some
predetermined measure, such as the rate of return. The project with the highest return is
ranked first, and the project with the lowest return is ranked last. Only acceptable projects
should be ranked. Ranking is useful in selecting the best of a group of mutually exclusive
projects and in evaluating projects with a view to capital rationing.
EXPANSION VERSUS REPLACEMENT CASH FLOWS
Developing relevant cash flow estimates is most straightforward in the case of expansiondecisions. In this case, the initial investment, operating cash inflows, and terminal cash flow
are merely the after-tax cash outflow and inflows associated with the proposed outlay.
Identifying relevant cash flows for replacement decisions is more complicated; the firm must
find the incremental cash outflow and inflows that would result from the proposed
replacement. The initial investment in this case is the difference between the initial investment
needed to acquire the new asset and any after-tax cash inflows expected from liquidation
today of the asset being replaced. The operating cash inflows are the difference between the
operating cash inflows from the new asset and those from the replaced asset. The terminal
cash flow is the difference between the after-tax cash flows expected upon termination of the
new and the old assets.
INDEPENDENT PROJECTS
Independent projects are those where cash flows are unrelated or independent from one
another. The acceptance of one project does not necessarily eliminate other projects.
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
15/54
MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE PROJECTS
Mutually exclusive projects are projects that are competing with one another. The acceptance
of mutually exclusive projects automatically eliminates other mutually exclusive projects that
are competing with one another.
CAPITAL BUDGETING:
EVALUATION TECHNIQUES
In essence, capital funds are invested for one basic reason: To obtain sufficient future
economic returns to warrant the original outlay i.e., sufficient cash receipts over the life of the
project to justify the investment made. Analytical methods of evaluation of capital projects
should take into account in one way or another, this basic trade-off of current cash outflows
against the future cash inflows.
To judge the attractiveness of any investment proposal, the financial manager must consider
the following elements
(i) The amount expended i.e., The net investment,
(ii) The potential benefits i.e., the operating cash inflows, and
(iii) The time period over which these benefits will accrue i.e., economic life of the project.
TRADITIONAL OR NON-DISCOUNTING TECHNIQUES
As the name itself suggests, these techniques do not discount the cash flows to find out theirpresent worth.
There are two such techniques available i.e.,
(i) The Payback period method, and
(ii) The Accounting rate of return.
1 . PAYBACK PERIOD
The payback period as name suggest is defined as the number of years required for the
proposal's cumulative cash inflows to be equal to it cash outflows. In other words, the
payback period is the length of time required to recover the initial cost of the project. The
payback period therefore, can be looked upon, as the-length of time required for a proposal to
'break even' on its net investment.
The Decision Rule:
The payback period does not give any clear indication of the decision rule. The payback
period calculated for a proposal is to be compared with some predetermined target period. If
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
16/54
the payback period is more than the target period, then the proposal should be rejected,
otherwise-it-may be accepted if the payback-period is less than the target period. There is no
systematic or accepted way of determination of target period and choosing a target period is
subject to some arbitrariness on the part of the decision maker. Further, if the different
proposals are to be ranked in order of priority, then the proposal with the shortest payback
period will be first in the priority list.
Critical Evaluation:
Out of all the available Capital budgeting technique (some of which are discussed later), the
payback period is the easiest to understand and apply. The payback period measures the
direct relationship between annual cash inflows from a proposal and the net investment
required. . This technique has been a popular method of evaluation of capital budgeting
proposals merely because of its simplicity. Yet, it is having its own problems and
disadvantages. The payback period as a technique of evaluation of capital budgeting
proposals can be critically examined in terms of its advantages and disadvantages as follows:
Advantages of payback method:
1. The payback period is simple and easy, in concept as well as in its applications. In
particular, a small firm having limited manpower, which does not have any special skill to
apply other sophisticated techniques, can adopt it.
2. It gives an indication of liquidity. In case a firm is having liquidity problems, then the
payback period is a good method to adopt as it emphasizes the earlier case inflows.
3. In a broader sense, the payback period deals with the risk also. The project with a shorter
payback period will be less risky as compared to project with a longer payback period, as the
cash inflows which arise further in the future will be less certain and hence more risky. So, thepayback period helps in weeding out the risky proposals by assigning lower priority.
Disadvantages of payback method:
1. The payback period entirely ignores many of the cash inflows, which occur after the
payback period. This could be misleading and could lead to discrimination against the
proposal, which generates substantial cash inflows in later years. By restricting itself to
answering the question when will this project make it initial investment? it ignores what
happens after the initial investment is recouped.
2 ACCOUNTING RATE OF RETURN OR AVERAGE RATE OF
RETURN (ARR)
The ARR is based on the accounting-concept of return on investment or rate of return. The
ARR may be defined as the annualized net income earned on the average funds invested in a
project. In other words, the annual returns of a project are expressed as a percentage of the
net investment in the project.
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
17/54
This clearly shows that the ARR is a measure based on the accounting profit rather than the
cash flows and is very similar to the measure of rate of return on capital employed, which is
generally used to measure the over all profitability of the firm.
The decision rule:
The ARR calculated as above is compared with the pre-specified rate of return. Obviously, if
the ARR is more than the pre-specified rate of return, then the project is likely to be accepted,
otherwise not. For example, in the above case the ARR of the proposal has been found to be
20%. In case, the firm requires a rate of return of at least 18%, then this proposal is
acceptable. However, if the minimum rate of return of the firm is 22% then this proposal is
likely to be rejected. The ARR can also be used to rank various mutually exclusive proposals.
The project with the highest ARR will have the top priority while the project with the lowest
ARR will be assigned lowest priority.
The Critical Evaluation:
No doubt, the ARR is relatively simple to calculate and easy to apply. The relevant data andinformation required for its calculation is readily available in the accounting records. The ARR
state the economic desirability of an investment in terms of a percentage return on the original
outlay. Unlike the payback period, the ARR considers all the benefits arising out of the
proposal through out its economic life.
However, the ARR has certain limitations and drawbacks when used as a technique of
project evaluation as follows.
1. It ignores the time value of money and considers the profit earned in the 1st year as
equal to the profits earned in later years. It does not discount the future profits.
2. The ARR is based on the accounting profits rather than the cash flows. It has already
been noted in the previous chapter that accounting profits are affected by different
accounting policies. It has also been noted earlier that a sound evaluation technique
should be based on the cash flows rather than the accounting profits.
3. The ARR also ignores the life of the proposal. A proposal with a longer life may have
the same ARR as another proposal with a shorter life has. On the basis of ARR, both
the proposals may be placed at par, but the proposal with a longer life should be
preferred over the proposal with a shorter life (as the former proposal will generate the
returns for a longer period). However, the ARR method fails to distinguish between the
two.
4. The ARR technique also ignores the salvage value of the proposal. In real sense,
the salvage value is also a return from the proposal and should be considered.
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
18/54
5. The ARR also fails to recognize the size of the investment required for the project.
Particularly, in case of mutually exclusive proposals, the two projects having
significantly different initial costs may have same ARR.
3 NET PRESENT VALUE (NPV) METHOD
The NPV is the first and the foremost of the discounted cash flow techniques. NPV is used
simply to weigh the elements of trade-off between investment outlays and the future benefits
in equivalent terms, and to determine whether the net balance of the present values is
favorable or not. The NPV of an investment proposal may be defined as the sum of the
present values of all the cash inflows less the sum of present values of all the cash outflows
associated with a proposal. In other words, the NPV of any proposal, that involves cash
inflows and outflow over a period of time, is equal to the net present value of all the cash
flows. Thus, the NPV is the sum of the discounted values of the cash flows of a proposal. In
case, the cash outflows i.e. the investment in the proposal occur only in the beginning at time
0, then NPV may be defined as the sum, of the present values of cash inflows less the initialinvestment.
A rate of discount must be specified and applied to both inflows and outflows in order to find
out their present values. When the present values of all inflows and. outflows are added, the
resultant figure is denoted as net present value. The figure can be positive or negative,
depending on whether there is a net inflow or outflow from the project. A word should be said
about the rate of discount. From an economic point of view, this rate of discount should be the
rate of return, the investor normally enjoys from investments of similar nature and risk. In
effect, it is opportunity rate of return. In case of a firm, the choice of a discount rate is
complicated by the variety of investments available and by the type of financing provided by
both the shareholders and the debt investors. The rate so employed is the overall cost ofcapital, which takes into account shareholders expectations, business risk and the leverage.
The merits of the NPV technique can be enumerated as follows.
1. It recognizes the time value of money. It helps evaluation of proposals involving cash
flows over a period of several years. The cash flows occurring at different point of time
are not directly comparable, but they can be made comparable by the application of
the discounting procedure.
2. The NPV technique considers the entire cash flow stream and all the cash inflows and
outflows, irrespective of the timing of their occurrence, are incorporated in the
calculation of the NPV.
3. The NPV technique is based on the cash flows rather than the accounting profit and
thus helps in analysing the effect of the proposal on the wealth of the shareholders in a
better way.
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
19/54
4. The discount rate, k, applied for discounting the future cash flows is in fact, the
minimum required rate of return, which incorporates both the pure return as well as the
premium required to set off the risk.
5. The NPV technique represents the net contribution of a proposal towards the wealth of
the firm and is therefore, in full conformity with the objective of maximization of the
wealth of the shareholders. The NPV concept has a built in earnings requirements in
addition to the recovery of the investment. Thus, the cushion implicit in the positive
NPV is truly an economic gain that goes beyond satisfying the required rate of return.
The NPV technique has the following shortcomings:
i. It involves difficult calculations. Moreover, it may not be able to overcome the uncertainty
involve with cash flows occurring after a sizeable time gap. It fails to answer questions
such as: How to quantify the potential error inherent in the cash flow estimates, and
how does the measure help making investment choices if such errors are significant?ii. The NPV technique requires the predetermination of the required rate of return, k, which
itself is a difficult job. If the value of the 'k' is not correctly taken, then the whole
exercise of the NPV may give wrong results.
iii. The NPV technique does not provide a measure of project's own rate of return; rather it
evaluates a proposal against an external variable i.e. the minimum required rate of
return.
iv. The decision under the NPV technique is based on a value, which is an absolute
measure. It ignores the difference in initial outflows, size of different proposals etc.while evaluating mutually exclusive proposals.
4 PROFITABILITY INDEX (PI)
Quite often one may be faced with a choice involving several alternative investment of
different size. In such a case, he cannot be indifferent to the fact that even though the NPV of
different alternatives may be close or even equal, these involve commitments of widely
ranging amounts. In other words, it does make a difference whether an investment proposal
promises a NPV of Rs. 1,000 for an outlay of Rs. 10,000; or whether an outlay of Rs. 25,000
is required to get the same NPV of Rs. 1,000, even if the lives of the, projects are assumed to
be same. In the first case, the NPV is much larger fraction (Rs. 1,000/10,000) then what it is
in the second case i.e., (Rs. 1,000/ 25,000), which makes the first proposal clearly more
attractive. The PI technique is a formal way of expressing this cost/benefit relationship.
This technique which is a variant of the NPV technique, is also known as Benefit- cost
ratio, or preset Value index. The PI is also based upon the basic concept of
discounting the future cash flows and is ascertained by comparing the present value of
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
20/54
the future cash inflows with the present value of the future cash outflows. The PI is
calculated by dividing the former by the latter.
Calculation:
The PI is calculated as follows:
PI = Total present value of cash inflows
Total Present Value of cash outflows
5 TERMINAL VALUE (TV)
The other variant of the NPV technique is known as the TV technique. In this case, a new
dimension is added to the NPV technique. As already discussed in the NPV technique, the
future cash flows are discounted to make them comparable. In the TV technique, the future
cash flows are first compounded at the expected rate of interest for the period from their
occurrence till the end of the economic life of the project. The compounded values are then
discounted at an appropriate discount rate to find out the present value. This present value iscompared with the initial outflow to find, out the suitability of the proposal.
6 DISCOUNTED PAYBACK PERIOD
This method is a combination of the original payback method and the discounted cash flow
technique. In this method, the cash flows of the project are discounted to find their present
values. The present value of the cash inflows is then compared with the present value of the
outflow, in order to identify the period taken to recover the initial cost or the present value of
outflow. This method thus, takes care of the main drawback of the pay back period method
and allows the consideration of the time value of money of cash flows. However, it still doesnot take into account those cash inflows, which occur subsequent to the payback period, and
sometimes these cash inflows may be substantial. Since, it is a variant of the original payback
period method, the discounted payback period method is also calculated in the same way as
the payback period, except that the future cash inflows are first discounted and then the
payback is calculated. However the discounted payback method is superior as, in addition to
the recovery of original investment, the time value of money is also considered.
6 INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN (IRR)
The other important discounted cash flow technique of evaluation of capital budgeting
proposals is known as IRR technique. The IRR of a proposal is defined as the discount rate,
which produces a zero NPV i. e., the IRR is the discount rate which will quite the present
value of cash inflows with the present value of cash outflow. The IRR is also known as
Marginal Rate of Return or Time Adjusted Rate of Return. Like the NPV, the IRR is also
based on the discounting technique. In the IRR technique, the future cash inflows are
discounted in such a way that their total present value is just equal to the present value of
total cash outflows. The time-schedule of occurrence of the future cash flows is known but the
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
21/54
rate of discount is not. Rather this discount rate is ascertained, by the trial and error
procedure. This rate of discount so calculated, which equates the
present value of future cash inflows with the present value of outflows, is known as the
The Decision Rule:
In order to make a decision on the basis of IRR technique; the firm has to determine, in the
first instance, its own required rate of return. This rate, k, is also known as the cut-off rate or
the hurdle rate. A particular proposal may be accepted if its IRR, r, is more than the minimum
rate i. e., k, otherwise rejected. However, if the IRR is just equal to the minimum rate, k, then
the firm may be indifferent. In case of ranking of mutually exclusive proposals, the proposal
with the highest IRR is given the top priority while the project with the lowest IRR is given the
lowest priority. Proposals whose IRR is less than the minimum required rate, k, may
altogether be rejected. This decision rule is based on the fact that the NPV of the project is
zero if its cash flows are discounted at the minimum' required rate i. e., k. If the proposal cangive a return higher than this minimum required rate, then it is expected to contribute to the
wealth of the shareholders. It may be noted however, that the IRR, r, of the proposal is
internal to the project while the minimum required rate, k, is external to the project.
The Critical Evaluation:
Besides the NPV technique, the IRR technique is the other important discounted cash flow
technique of evaluation of capital budgeting proposals. The IRR technique has been
compared with the NPV technique at a later stage.
However, the merits of the IRR technique can be summarized as follows:
i. The IRR technique takes into account the time value of money and the cash flows occurring
at different point of time are adjusted for time value of money to make them comparable.
ii. It is a profit-oriented concept and helps selecting those proposals which are expected to
earn more than the minimum required rate of return. So, the IRR technique helps achieving
the objective of maximization of shareholders wealth.
iii. The IRR of a proposal is expressed as a percentage and is compared with the cutoff rate,
which is also expressed as a percentage. Thus, the IRR has an appeal for those who want to
analyze proposal in terms of its percentage return.
iv. Like NPV technique, the IRR technique is also based on the consideration of all the cash
flows occurring at any time. The salvage value, the working capital used and released etc. are
also considered.
v. The IRR technique is based on the cash flows rather than the accounting profit.
Thus, it can be stated that the IRR technique possesses all the ingredients of a sound
evaluation technique. Still it has, on the other hand, some draw backs, as follows:
a) As far as the calculation of IRR is concerned, it involves a tedious and
complicated trial and error procedure.
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
22/54
b) An important drawback of the IRR technique is that it makes an implied assumption that
the future cash inflows of a proposal are reinvested at a rate equal to the IRR. Say, in case of
mutually exclusive proposals, say A and B having IRR of 18% and 16%, the IRR technique
makes an implied assumption that the future cash inflows of project A will be reinvested at
18% while the cash inflows of project B will be reinvested at 16%. It is imaginary to think that
the same firm will have different reinvestment opportunities depending upon the proposal
accepted.
c) Since, the IRR is a scaled measure, it tends to be biased towards the smaller projects
which are much more likely to yield high percentage returns over the larger projects.
CAPITAL BUDGETING UNDER CAPITAL RATIONING
It is a situation where the firm has limited funds available but cannot be undertaken in view of
the limited funds. This situation may occur when a firm is either unable or unwilling to obtain
additional funds in order to undertake financially viable capital budgeting proposals. Thus afirm by choice or under compulsions sets absolute ceiling on its capital spending in a period at
a level that will cause it to reject or avoid some of the profitable projects. For example, if a firm
has different proposals with positive NPV but the initial funds required for the implementation
of all these proposals are not available or cannot be procured from the capital market for one
reason or the other, the firm is said to be operating under condition of capital rationing. In
other words, a firm faces capital rationing when it finds itself unable to take on projects that
earn returns more than the cut-off rate because it does not have (i) the funds on hand, or (ii)
the capacity to raise the funds needed to finance these projects. In the context of the NPV
rule, this implies that the firm does not have and cannot raise the funds to take all the posi-
tive NPV proposals. The fact that a firm has many projects and limited resources does notneces-sarily imply that it faces capital rationing, as the firm might still have the capacity to
raise funds from the capital market. The capital rationing may be described as:
1.Internal Capital Rationing:
It is a situation where the firm has imposed limit on the funds allocated for fresh investment
though (i) the funds might otherwise be available within the firm, or (ii) additional funds can be
procured by the firm from the capital market. Some firms may follow a policy of using only
internally generated funds (by ploughing back of profits) for new investments. Some firms
avoid debt capital because of the associated financial risk and avoid external equity because
of a desire not to loose control. This type of capital rationing implies that the firm is not willing
to grow further. Obviously, the internal capital rationing is not in the best interest of the
shareholders in the long run, as it results in foregoing the profitable proposals.
2. External Capital Rationing:
It is a situation when the firm is willing to undertake the financially viable proposals but is
unable to do so because either it is not having sufficient funds available at its disposal or the
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
23/54
capital market conditions are not conductive enough to let firm raise the required funds from
the market.
A firm having no capital rationing will like to take all the capital budgeting proposals which
have positive, NPV and reject those which are having negative NPV. In case-of mutually
exclusive proposals, the firm will like to take that proposal which has the highest positive NPV
irrespective of the funds requirements. But the problem is that if the firm is facing capital
rationing, then how to distribute the available scarce and limited capital funds among
competitive proposals.
At this stage, it is also necessary to classify different projects into 2 classes i.e.,
divisible projects and indivisible projects.
a) Divisible Projects:
There are certain projects, which can either be taken in full or can be taken in parts. For
example, it building (having 5 floors) can be constructed at a cost of 5 crores. However, if the
funds are not sufficiently available then only a part of the building, say only 2 floors, can beconstructed for the time being. But all the proposals may not be divisible.
b) Indivisible Projects:
There are certain proposals, which are indivisible. These proposals have a feature that
either the proposal as a whole be taken in its totality or not taken at all. For example, a
proposal to buy a helicopter cannot be taken in parts. Similarly, a multi stage plant can
only be installed fully but not in parts. There can be many instances of indivisible
projects.
Modified Internal Rate Of Return - MIRR
While the internal rate of return (IRR) assumes the cash flows from a project are reinvested at
the IRR, the modified IRR assumes that all cash flows are reinvested at the firm's cost of
capital. Therefore, MIRR more accurately reflects the profitability of a project.
For example, say a two-year project with an initial outlay of $195 and a cost of capital of 12%,
will return $121 in the first year and $131 in the second year. To find the IRR of the project so
that the net present value (NPV) = 0: NPV = 0 = -195 + 121/(1+ IRR) + 131/(1 + IRR)2 NPV
= 0 when IRR = 18.66% Solving for NPV using MIRR, we will replace the IRR with our MIRR
= cost of capital of 12% : NPV = -195 + 121/(1+ .12) + 131/(1 + .12)2 NPV
= 17.47 when MIRR = 12% Thus, using the IRR could result in a positive NPV (good project),
but it could turn out to be a bad project (NPV is negative) if the MIRR were used. As a result,
using MIRR versus IRR better reflects the value of a project.
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
24/54
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
25/54
In capital budgeting decision it helps accepting those proposals whose rate of return is more
than the cost of capital of the firm and hence results in increasing the value of the firm.
Similarly, the firm's value is reduced when the rate of return on the proposal falls below the
cost of capital. Thus, the concept of cost of capital is consistent with the goal of maximization
of shareholders wealth and it works as a tool to achieve this goal. Further, the cost of capital
has a useful role to play in deciding the financial plan or capital structure of the firm. It may be
noted that in order to maximize the value of the firm, the cost of all the different sources of
funds must be minimized. The cost of capital of different sources usually varied and the firm
will like to have a combination of these sources in such a way so as to minimize the overall
cost of capital of the firm.
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
26/54
Module 3
RISK ANALYSIS IN CAPITAL BUDGETING
The cash flows from an investment are estimated when the proposal is evaluated, however,
the returns are not known until the cash flows actually occur. The uncertainty of returns from
the moment, the funds are invested until management and investor know how much the
projects has earned, is a primary determinant of a proposal's risk. The owner of a firm are
ordinarily concerned with the riskiness of their capital, and management must therefore, take
risk into account in evaluation of capital budgeting proposals.
In case, the cash flows associated with a proposal are known with certainty then the
techniques such as NPV, IRR or any other may be used to evaluate the desirability of the
proposal. However, when the cash flows are not known with certainty, a measure of risk of
the proposal should also be brought into the evaluation system. Such resultant capital
budgeting decision criterion will then evaluate the proposals by considering both the risk and
return associated with the proposal. As already discussed above a proposal is said to containrisk when the set of possible cash flows is known but it is not possible at time 0 (when the
decision is being taken) to predict the specific cash flows that will actually occur in future.
TYPES AND SOURCES OF RISK IN CAPITAL BUDGETING:
The risk in a project can be classified into different groups such as the project itself,
competition, shifts in the industry, international considerations etc., as follows:
1. Project Specific Risk:
This type of risk is project specific i.e., an individual project may have higher or lower cash
flows than expected, either because of the wrong estimation or because of factors specific to
that project. When firms takes a large number of similar projects, it may be argued that muchof this project specific risk would be diversified away The project specific risk affects only the
project under consideration and may arise from factors specific to project or estimation error.
2. Competition Risk:
The second type of risk is competition risk where the cash flows of a project are affected by
the actions of the competitors. Although, a good project analysis might consider the reactions
of the competitors, the actual actions taken by the competitors may be different from those
expected. In most of the cases, this risk will affect more than one project and is therefore
difficult to be diversified away in the normal course of business.
3. Industry Specific Risk:
The third type of risk is the industry specific risk i.e., the risk that primarily affects the earnings
and cash flows of a specific industry only. This risk may arise because of three factors. The
first is technology risk, which reflects the effects of technologies that change or evolve in
ways different from those expected when the project was originally analyzed. The second is
legal risk, which reflects the effect of changing laws and regulation affecting a particular
industry only. The third may be the commodity risk, which reflects the effects of price
changes in goods and services that are used or produced.
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
27/54
4. International Risk:
A firm faces this type of risk when it takes on projects outside its domestic market. In such
cases, the earnings and cash flows might be different than expected owing to exchange rate
movements or political changes. Some of this risk may be diversified away by a firm in the
normal course of business by taking on projects in different countries whose currencies may
not all move in the same direction. Multinational firms who hold projects in number of
countries are able to diversify away this risk.
5. Market Risk:
The last type of risk arises by the factors that affect essentially all companies and all projects,
of course in varying degrees. For example, changes in interest rate structure will affect the
projects already taken as well as those yet to be taken, both directly through the discount rate
and indirectly through cash flows. Other factors that affect all the projects may be inflation,
economic conditions etc. Although the expected values of these entire variables may be
considered in the capital budgeting analysis, changes in these variables will affect their
values. Firms cannot diversify away this risk in the normal course of business, although may
be considered to some extent only.
.Assumptions of capital Budgeting under risk:
The discussion on capital budgeting under risky situations is based upon the following
assumptions:
1. That the firm is not having any capital rationing, and no profitable project will be rejected
for want of funds.
2. That the proposals net investment is known with certainty.
3. Each set of cash flows is known with certainty, and is mutually exclusive and
exhaustive.
4. The required rate of return of the firm is given and is indicative of the risk-return
characteristics of the proposal.
5. The firm is basically risk-averse. This assumption is important as it implies that the finance
manager will not accept a risky proposal unless its expected profits are sufficient to
compensate for the risk. The risk aversion also means that the additional risk will be
accepted only if it results in disproportionately larger increase in expected returns.
This assumption of risk aversions can be expressed in terms of the
followingprepositions:
If the two proposals have the same expected return, then theproposal with lesser
risk will be preferred, and
If two proposals have same degree of risk then proposal with thehigher expected
return would be preferred.
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
28/54
Incorporating Risk in the Capital Budgeting Analysis:
In all the capital budgeting decisions, there is always an element of risk involved which must
be considered while evaluating different investment proposals. There are several techniques
available to handle the risk perception of capital budgeting proposals. These techniques differ
in their approach and methodology to incorporate risk in the evaluation process. Broadly
speaking, these techniques can be grouped into conventional techniques and statistical
techniques as follows:
Conventional Techniques Statistical Techniques
1. Payback period
2. Risk adjusted Discount Rate
3. Certainty equivalents
4. Sensitivity Analysis
5. Financial Break-even
1. Probability Distribution Approach
2. Simulation Analysis
3. Decision Tree Approach
CONVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES OF RISK ANALYSIS
These techniques are also known as traditional or non-mathematical techniques to evaluate
risk. These approaches are simple and based on theoretical assumptions. Some of the
conventional techniques are as follows:
1 PAYBACK PERIOD:
As already discussed, the Payback Period method considers the time period over which the
original investment in the project will be recovered by the firm out of the cash inflows of the
project. The payback period is then compared with the target payback period. If the proposal's
payback period is less than or equal to the target payback period, it may be accepted,
otherwise rejected. In order to incorporate risk of the proposal, the target payback period may
be shortened. As a result some project, which would have been on the verge of being
selected, otherwise, will now be rejected. The shortening of the target payback period is
based on the assumption that larger the recovery period, more risky the proposal would
be.
The Payback Period as an approach to handle risk is simple and straight forward. But it fails
to measure the risk, which may be of different degree in different alternative proposals.
Moreover, it reduces only that risk which arises due to time period and thus allows for other
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
29/54
risks to prevail. The payback period also ignores the time value of money as well as the cash
flows arising after the payback period.
2 RISK ADJUSTED DISCOUNT RATE (RADR):
Another way of adjusting for risk is to modify the rate of return to include a risk, premium
wherever needed. In a sense, the reasoning behind this is quite simple i.e., the greater the
risk, the higher should be the desired return from a proposals. The RADR approach to handle
risk in a capital budgeting decision process is a more direct method. The RADR is based on
the premise that riskiness of a proposal may be taken care of, by adjusting the discount rate.
The cash flows from a more risky proposal should be discounted at a relatively higher
discount rate as compared to other proposals whose cash flows are less risky.
An investor is basically risk averse and try to avoid risk. However, he may be ready to take
risk provided he is rewarded for undertaking risk by higher returns. So, more risky the
investment is, the greater would be the expected return. The expected return is expressed in
terms of discount rate, which is also termed as the minimum required rate of return generatedby a proposal if it is to be accepted. Therefore, there is a positive, correlation between risk of
a proposal and the discount rate.
A firm at any point of time has a risk level emanating from the existing investment. The firm
also has a discount rate to reflect that level of risk. In case, there is no risk of the existing
investment, then the present discount rate may be known as the risk free discount rate. If the
risk level of the new proposal is higher than the risk level of the existing investment, then the
discount rate to be applied to find out, the present values of the cash flows of the proposal
should also be higher than the present discount rate. Similarly two different proposals having
varying degree of risk should be evaluated at different discount rates. The difference betweenthe discount rate applied to a risk less proposal and a risky proposal is known as the risk
premium. The RADR may be expressed in terms of Equation as follows:
Ka = k +
Where Ka = Risk Adjusted Discount Rate
k = Risk free Discount Rate, and
= Risk Adjustment Premium
It may be noted that the risk free discount rate is described as the rate of return on the
government securities. Since all the business proposals have higher degree of risk as
compared to zero degree of risk of government securities, the RADR is always greater than
the risk free rate. As the risk of a proposal increases, the risk adjustment premium i.e., a, also
increases. The relationship between the risk free rate, the risk premium the RADR and the
risk return line has been explained in the following figure.
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
30/54
3 CERTAINTY EQUIVALENTS (CE):
An alternative approach to incorporate the risk is to adjust the cash flows of a proposal to
reflect the riskiness. The CE approach attempts at adjusting the future cash flows instead of
adjusting the discount rates. The expected future cash flows, which are taken as risky and
uncertain, are converted into certainty cash flows. Intuitively, more risky cash flows will be
adjusted down lower than will the less risky cash flows. The extent of adjustment will vary and
it can be either subjective or based on a risk return model. These adjusted cash flows are
then discounted at risk free discount rate to find out the NPV of the proposal.
The procedure for the CE approach can be explained as follows:
Step1.
Estimation of the future cash flows from the proposal. These cash flows do have some degree
of risk involved.
Step 2.
The calculation of the CE factors for different years. These CE factors reflect the proportion of
the future cash flow a finance manager would be ready to accept now in exchange for the
future cash flow. The CE factors represent the level of present money at which the firm wouldbe indifferent between accepting the present money or the future cash flow. For example,
cash inflow of Rs. 10,000 is receivable after 2 years. However, if the inflow is available right
now, the firm may be ready to accept even 70% of Rs. 10,000 i.e., Rs. 7,000 only. This 70%
or .7 is the CE factor. For different years the CE factors, will be different to account for the
timing as well as the varying degree of risk involved. It may be noted that higher the riskiness
of a cash flow, the lower will be the CE factor.
Step 3.
The expected cash flows for different years as calculated in step 1 above are multiplied by the
respective CE factors and the resultant figures are described as certainty equivalent cash
flows.Step 4.
Once all the cash flows are reduced to CE cash flows then these CE cash flows are dis-
counted at risk free rate to find out the NPV of the proposal.
Decision rule in CE approach
Accept a proposal with positive CE NPV. In case of mutually exclusive proposals the rule is
that the proposal having the highest positive CE NPV is accepted.
4 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS:
As discussed that the NPV of a project is based upon the series of cash flows and the
discount factor. Both these determinants depend upon so many variables such as sales
revenue, input cost, competition etc. Given the level of all these variables, there will be a set
series of cash flows and hence there will be a NPV of the proposal. However, if any of these
variables changes then the value of the NPV will also change. It means that the value of NPV
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
31/54
is sensitive to all these variables. However, in most of the cases, the value of NPV will not
change in the same proportion for a given change in anyone of these variables. For some
variables the NPV may be less sensitive while for others the NPV may be more sensitive. The
Sensitivity Analysis (SA) deals with the consideration of sensitivity of the NPV in relation to
different variables contributing to the NPV. .
In general, the SA is a theoretical procedure whereby values of the variable parameters
(inputs) are changed to denote different situations/assumptions, and the effect of these
changes is measured on the expected value of the outcome (result). When applied to the
capital budgeting situations, the SA is a technique to evaluate the effect of changes in factors
contributing to cash flows on the value of the NPV of the proposal .
The single point estimates of cash flows or the expected results are based on the judgment
of the analyst and the information available. In fact, these are the averages of the possible
outcome, implicitly weighed by their respective probabilities. By introducing a range of high,
low and expected levels of cash inflows and outflows, the analyst can use a form of sensitivity
analysis to indicate the consequences of expected fluctuations, and thus the degree of risk. At
times, the past experience can provide clues to the range of future outcomes, but essentiallythe projection of future cash flows has to be judgmental and based on specific estimates.
The following steps are required to apply the SA to, capital budgeting proposals:
A) Based on the expectations for the future, the cash flows are estimated in respect of the
proposal.
B) To identify the variables which have a bearing on the cash flows of a proposal. For
example, some of these variables may be the selling price, cost of inputs, market share,
market growth rate etc.,
C) To establish the relationship, between these variables and the output value i.e., the effectof these variables on the value of NPV of the proposal.
D) To find out the range of variations and the most likely value of each of these variables, and
E) To find out the effect of change in any of these variables on the value of NPV. This
exercise should be performed for all the factors individually. For example, in case of a project
involving .the product sale, the effect of change in different variables such as number of units
sold, selling price, discount rate etc., can be taken up on the NPV or IRR
of the project. This information can be used in conjunction with the basic capital budgeting
analysis to decide whether or not to take up the project.
5 BREAK-EVEN ANALYSIS:
Traditional break-even analysis attempts to estimate the revenues that will be needed in order
for a project to break even in accounting terms- that is, to make a net income zero. However,
a capital budgeting proposal may be analyzed as to how much revenue will be needed for a
project to break even in financial terms-that is, to make the net present value zero.
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
32/54
The financial break-even is computed by first estimating the annual cash flows needed to
make the net present value zero, then ascertaining the revenues needed to generate this
annual cash flow, and finally estimating the number of units that have to be sold to create this
revenue.
In fact, the financial Break-even is a higher hurdle because it requires the firm to make
sufficient returns to cover the discount rate on the funds invested in the project.
Consequently, the financial break-even will be higher (in units and amount) then the
accounting break-even.
STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES OF RISK ANALYSIS
The different techniques discussed in the previous lesson were conventional techniques to
study, analyze and incorporate the risk associated with a proposal, fail to measure and
quantify the risk in precise terms. On the other hand, there are certain statistical techniquesavailable to measure and incorporate risk in a capital budgeting decision process. These
techniques, as discussed below, can be used to evaluate the risk-return characteristics of a
capital budgeting proposal. The most important concept used in these statistical techniques is
that of probability. Therefore, before analyzing the statistical techniques of incorporating risk,
the concept of probability must also be understood.
The Concept of Probability:
The probability may be defined as the likelihood of happening or non-happening of an event.
It may be described as a measure of chance of happening or non-happening of an event. Forexample, one may say that there are 20% chances that the sales will increase by 80% during
the year, or that there are 75% chances that the firm will be able to achieve 50% market
share over a period of next 5 years. These descriptions of 20% and 75% chances are the
description of probability of the respective events. So, the probability may be taken as a
measure of an opinion about the likelihood of happening of an event. If the event is certain to
happen, then the probability is defined as one and if the event has no chance of occurrence,
then the probability is described as 0. So, the probability always has a value between 0 and 1.
While estimating the cash inflows resulting from a proposal say, at the end of year 1, a
finance manager may find that he is not having one estimation of cash inflow rather he has a
series of estimation of cash inflows for the that year and for each estimation there is a
probability that the actual cash flows may be same as estimated. For example, the following is
the series of estimated cash inflows together with their probabilities at the end of year 1.
Cash flows Probabilities
Rs. l,00,000 .2
1,50,000 .4
1,75,000 .3
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
33/54
2,00,000 .1
Similarly, series of estimated cash inflows may be available for different other years also.
Two points are worth noting here.
First, that the total of probabilities for anyone year would always be equal to one, and
Second, that the actual cash inflow may be any figure, even other than the cash inflows
given in the series. It may be noted that the series of expected cash inflows together withthe associated probabilities for a particular year is also know as probability distribution.
1 Probability Distribution:
The probability distribution may be defined as a set of possible cash flows that may occur at a
point of time and their probabilities of occurrence, In the probability distribution given above
for year 1, there are 4 possible cash inflows.
The probabilities given for these cash inflows can be interpreted as follows: There is a 20%
chance that the cash inflows will be Rs. 1,00,000; there is 40% chance that the cash inflow
will be Rs. 1,50;000 and so on.
In some cases, the probabilities can be assigned on the basis of past experience or historical
data. But it may not always be possible in a capital budgeting decision. The reason for this is
obvious. The capital budgeting decisions are, generally, not of repetitive nature. Moreover,
data available from the experience of other firms may not be available or not at all relevant,
because each capital budgeting situation is a specific situation. Therefore, in most of the
capital budgeting situations, the decision maker on the basis of some relevant facts and
figures and his subjective considerations usually assigns the probabilities.
If the decision maker foresees a risk in the proposal then he has to prepare a separate
probability distribution to summarize the possible cash flow for each year through the
economic life of the proposal. Thereafter, the next step is to find out the expected value ofprobability, distribution for each year.
Expected value of a Probability Distribution:
The initial step required in evaluating a risky proposal is to find out the expected value of
probability distribution for each year. For this, each cash flow of the probability distribution is
multiplied by the respective probability of the cash flow and then adding the resulting
products. This final figure is then considered as the expected value of the cash inflow for that
year for which the probability distribution has been considered. This procedure is to be
adopted for the probability distributions for all the years and then the expected value of cash
inflows are discounted at an appropriate discount rate to find out the NPV of the proposal.
Standard Deviation: An Absolute Measure of Risk and Variability.
The statistical tool of standard deviation provides a measure of spread of the distribution of
expected cash flows. The standard deviation as a technique of measuring dispersion can be
used to measure the deviations of each possible cash flow about the expected value of cash
flow. It is also named as root-mean-square deviation and is calculated by taking the square
root of the mean of squared deviations. These deviations refer to the difference between,
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
34/54
possible cash flow and the expected value of the cash flow. The following steps are needed to
ascertain the standard deviation of the probability distribution of cash flows:
Step1.
Find out the probability distribution of the cash flows over different years and find out
expected value of cash flow for each year.
Step 2.
Subtract each cash flow (CF) from the expected value of the cash flow i.e., EVCF and get thesquare of the differences i.e., (CF-EVCF)2.
Step 3.
Multiply the squared deviations i.e., (CF-EVCF)2 by the probabilities of the occurrence of its
corresponding cash flow, i.e., find out PI (CF1-EVCF)2, or P2 (CF2-EVCF)f or P3 (CF3-EVCF)2
etc. where Pi is the probability of a particular cash flow.
Step 4.
Add these products i.e., find out the sum of Pi (CFi-EVCF)2 and get the square root of this
figure i. e., find out the value of,
21)(EVCFCFPiini==This value is called the standard deviation, . It may be noted that the standard deviation is
calculated by taking all deviations positive or negative. This implies that the risk aversion
extends to, all the deviations from the expected value even if the deviations are positive i.e.,
when the possible cash flow are more than the expected value of the cash flow. The larger
dispersion will produce a larger standard deviation and therefore, larger standard deviation
indicates riskier capital budgeting proposals.
Coefficient of Variation: A Relative Measure of Risk.Coefficient of Variation (CV) is a relative measure of dispersion and can be applied in capital
budgeting decision process to measure the risk of a project particularly in case when the
alternative projects are of different sizes. The CV is defined as the standard deviation of the
probability distribution divided by its expected value i.e.,
CV = /EVCF.
It may be noted that the CV is a pure number and is not affected by the measuring unit. The
advantage of CV over standard deviation is that the former can be used to compare the
riskiness of mutually exclusive proposals even if their expected values are not equal. The CVis also useful in evaluation of those proposals whose initial outlays differ substantially.
PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION APPROACH:
In the preceding section the concept of probability has been introduced to take care of the risk
and variability of cash flows. The expected values of cash flows were calculated for difference
year and then the NPV and the standard deviation were calculated, in order to reach at a
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
35/54
capital budgeting decision. Now this analysis can be extended and the probability theory can
be applied to know something more about the variability cash flows.
The concept of probability has been used to find out the NPV of the proposal. It results in
acceptance of those proposals, which have a positive NPV. However, in actual practice
the value of NPV may be less than 0 or just 0 or a positive value. The probability
distribution approach attempts to determine the probability that the actual NPV occurrence
is going to be less than 0 and that the project has therefore, been accepted wrongly. Thus,
the probability distribution approach helps in determining the error of judgment of the firm
in selecting a proposal, which at a later stage turns out to be a negative NPV project. In
order to develop the probability distribution approach, an important assumption regarding
the behavior of cash flows needs to be made. The re-quired assumption is whether the
cash flows associated with a project are independent cash flows or dependent cash flows.
A proposal is set to be having independent cash flows when the cash flow of any period is not
affected by the cash flow or flows of any of the preceding period. For example, the expectedcash flow of year 2 is not affected by the cash inflow of year 1 and similarly the cash flow of
year 5 is not affected by the cash inflow of year preceding period i.e., year 1 through year 4.
On the other hand, a proposal is said to have dependent cash flows when the favorable or
unfavorable cash flow in a particular period affects the cash flow of any period thereafter. In
practice, most of the proposals have dependent cash flows. The effect of the nature of cash
flow on the calculation of the value of NPV may be analyzed as follows:
2 SIMULATION ANALYSIS:
Simulation is yet another statistical technique to deal with uncertainty and is also based on
the concept of probabilities. Theoretically speaking, simulation refers to 'Creation of an
Appearance without the Reality'. Thus, in simulation, the appearance seems to be true but it
is not real. Simulation therefore, refers to representation of a system that reacts to a change
to any of input variable in a similar way as to that variable which is being simulated. There are
several techniques of simulation, however, the Monto Carlo Method is the most common. The
Monto Carlo Method is based on the concept of random numbers and is useful in the analysis
of uncertainty.
The simulation analysis can be applied to capital budgeting decision situations also. When
applied to capital budgeting, the simulation requires the generation of values of cash flows
using predetermined-probability distribution and the random numbers. The different
components of cash flows are placed in relation to one another in a mathematical model. The
process of generating the values of cash flows is repeated numerous times to result in a
probability distribution of cash flows. The process of generating the random number and using
the probability distribution of cash flows help generating values of different variables. These
values are then put in a mathematical model to develop a NPV. By repeating the same
process for number of times say a thousand or ten thousands times, a probability distribution
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
36/54
of NPV is created. The simulation allows considering the projects under alternative scenarios.
The decision maker can consider the effect of a limited number of plausible combinations of
variables affecting the outcome of a proposal. The application of simulation analysis has been
analyzed in the following example.
3 DECISION TREE APPROACH:
Quite often a firm may have to take a sequential decision i.e., the present decision is affected
by the decisions taken in the past or it affects the future decisions of the same firm. In capital
budgeting, the evaluation of a project frequently requires a sequential decision making
process where the accept-reject decision is made in several stages. Instead of taking a
decision once for all, it is broken up into several parts and stages. At each stage there may be
more than one option available and the firm may have to decide every time that which option
is to be taken for. This can be explained with the help of a simple situation.
A firm is considering to launch a new product and to install a plant with capacity of 10,000units a month. It is hopeful of selling the entire production. However, if due to one or the
other factor, the demand is not generated to lift even the break-even level of production,
then the firm will face a heavy loss. In this case, it will be better for the firm to first install a
pilot project and go for test marketing. If the market accepts the product, full-fledged plant
may be installed in the next stage. This is a two-stage decision. The first occurs before the
test market. At that point, the cash flows related to both the test and to the production
must be considered. After the test, another decision must be made. At this point, the cash
flows related to the market test are sunk costs and are irrelevant to the decision to be
made. At this second point, the decision to be made cannot affect the cash flows already
made in connection with the market test. Hence according to the incremental cash flowsrule, they are not relevant. The only relevant flows are those related to the production
phase. However, in practice there may be multi stages decisions also.
An analytical technique used in sequential decisions is decision tree. The decision tree
approach can take care of these types of multi stages decisions. The decision tree approach
gets its name because of the resemblance with a tree having number of branches. A decision
tree is a branching diagram representing a decision problem as a series of decisions to be
taken under conditions of uncertainty. A present decision depends upon the past decision and
their outcomes. The decision trees are the diagrams that permit the various decisions
alternatives, their outcomes and probabilities of their occurrences to be mapped in a clearfashion. In a typical decision tree, therefore, the project is broken down in to clearly defined
stages, and the possible outcomes at each stage are listed along with the probabilities and
cash flows effect of each outcome.
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
37/54
Steps in Decision Tree Approach:
While constructing a decision tree for a given problem the following steps may be required.
1. Break the Project into clearly defined stages. In some cases, this is fairly easy to do
so. For example, a computer software company may take up the project of new
package in different stages, i.e., research and development, market testing, limited
production and then full production. Similarly, other capital budgeting decisions may
also be broken up in different stages.
2. List all the possible outcomes at each stage. Specify the probability of each outcome
at each stage based on information available. This task will become progressively
more difficult as more and more stages introduced.
3. Specify the effect of each outcome on the expected cash flows form the project.
4. Evaluate the optimal action to be taken at each stage in the decision tree, based on
the outcome at the previous stage and its effect on cash flows.
5. Estimate the optimal action to be taken at the vary first stage , based on the
expected cash flows over the entire projects and all the likely outcomes of the cash
flows. Following example illustrates the decision tree approach.
CAPM ( CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL )
CAPM was developed by financial economist william sharpe. Its based on idea that
investment includes systematic and un systematic risk. CAPM is evolved as a way tomeasure systematic risk. General idea behind CAPM is that investors need to be
compensated in two ways.
1) time value of money, thats given by risk free rate of interest
2) compensation for taking additional risk.
This compensation is calculated by taking a risk measure (beta) that compares the return of
the asset to the market over a period of time.
CAPM FORMULA
Rs = Rf + Bs (Rm Rf )
Where,
Rs = return required on the investment
Rf = return on risk free investment
Bs = beta of the security (systematic risk)
-
8/8/2019 Poject Analysis and Appraisal Notes
38/54
Rm = average return on all the securities
CAPM reflects the mathematical relationship bet risk and return. Higher the risk (beta) the
higher is the required return.
ASSUMPTIONS UNDER CAPM
A) all investors have rational expectations
B) there are no arbitrage opportunities
C) returns are distributed normally
D) fixed quantity of assets
E) perfect capital market
F) risk free rates exists with time less borrowing capacity an