Transcript
Page 1: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

Non antiarrhythmic drugs for AF

Page 2: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid
Page 3: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid
Page 4: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

AF Treatment

Substrate Modifyers

Drugs

Antiagregation

Anticoagulation

Rate Control ?

Substrate Ablation AVN

Ablation

Rhythm Control ?

Page 5: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

Therapy Objectives for AF•Symptomatic Improvement•Quality of life Improvement•Thromboembolism

Prevention•Remodelling Prevention•Heart Failure Prevention •Mortality Reduction

Page 6: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

Therapy Options in AF – Type and Duration of AF– Type y Severity of Symptoms– Associated Cardiac Diseases– Age– Systemic Associated Diseases– Long or Short Term Follow up– Pharmacologic or Non

Pharmacologic

Page 7: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

Upstream Therapy in AF – Renin Angiotensin Inhibitors Drugs

•ACE`s•ARB`s

– Statins– Steroids– PUFA

Page 8: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

• Blockade of Ang II prevents electrical remodeling induced by rapid atrial pacing. Nakashima, 2000.

• ACE–dependent Ekr1/Ekr2 responsible of atrial fibrosis. Goette, 2000

• Candesartan prevents development of structural remodeling in the atria. Kumagai, 2003

Experimental DataExperimental Data

Page 9: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

Nakashima et al . 2000

Effect of Candesartan/ Captopril preventing electrical remodeling with rapid atrial pacing in the animal model

Page 10: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

Genetic Determinants of AF Genetic Determinants of AF Potasium and Sodium ChannelsPotasium and Sodium Channels

Page 11: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

Candesartan

Kumagai K et al. JACC 2003

Experimental AF. Electro/Anatomic Changes with Candesartan

Control

Page 12: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

ACEI´s and ARB´s Hemodynamic Effects

• Decrease Peripheral Vascular Resistance

• Improve Cardiac Distensibility• Reduce Arterial Pressure in

Hypertension• In HF patients

– Venous and Arterial Dilatation– Reduce Preload and Afterload– Reduce PWP and Pulmonary Congestion– Increase Cardiac Output

Page 13: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

ACEI´s and ARB´s Neurohormonal Effects

•Decrease Angiotensin II.•Decrease Aldosterone. •Increase in Renin and Angiotensin I.

•Reduce Epinephrine and Norepinephrine.

•ACEI´s increase Bradikinin.

Page 14: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

ACEI`s or ARB`s for IHD Prevention

•Plaque Stabilization• Improvement of Endothelial Dysfunction• Improvement of Fibrinolysis• Modulation of Arterial Vasoconstriction • Blood Pressure Reduction

Page 15: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

ACEI´s and ARB´s Antiproliferative Effects

•Reduction of Vascular Hypertrophy.

•Reduction of Ventricular Hypertrophy.

•Reduce Extracellular Proliferation. –Reduction of Fibrosis.

Page 16: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

Atrial Remodeling: Mechanisms of Efficacy for ARB´s• Hemodynamic effect:

– Decreased atrial stretch– Lowering end-diastolic left ventricular pressure

• Prevention of electrical remodeling:– Direct action on ionic currents at the atrial level– Modifying the sympathetic tone

• Preventing structural remodeling– Reduction of atrial fibrosis

• Reduction of atrial dilatation and apoptosisMadrid A , Moro C. Circulation 2002;106:331–6

Page 17: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

Electrophysiological Effect of Irbesartan

1. Irbesartán does not modify IKr or IKs:Should not alter APD at VENTRICULAR level

2. Irbesartán blocks moderately IKur and Ito currents: it should prolong APD at ATRIAL level

200 ms

0.5

nA

Control

Irbesartan0.1 M

50 ms

1 nA

Control

Irbesartan0.1M

IKur: hKv1.5 ITo: Kv4.3

Moreno et al., J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2003;304:862

Page 18: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm after Conversion from Persistent AF

Amiodarone + Irbesartan

Amiodarone

1.00.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10.0

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390

Follow-up (days)

2-month lower recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation

Longer time to first arrhythmia recurrence

Log Rank = 0.007

Madrid AH, Moro C et al. Circulation 2002;106:331-6.

% E

vent

-free

pat

ient

s

Page 19: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

Madrid AH, Moro C. PACE 2004

Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation Metaanalysis with ACEI’s ARB’s

Page 20: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

Irbesartan in Lone AFDose Response : 150-300 mg

Madrid AH, Moro C. JRAAS 2004; 5 :114-120

Page 21: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

RAS Inhibitors in Lone AF

Page 22: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

RAS Inhibitors in Lone AF

Page 23: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

RAS Inhibitors in Lone AF

Page 24: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

Ramipril in Lone AF• Preventing histological remodeling

such as Inflammation, myocarditis-like changes,Fibrosis and atrial dilatation.

• Preventing electrical remodeling induced by Angiotensin II.

• Reducing atrial stretch and intraatrial pressure.

• Reduction of sympathetic tone. • Reduction of blood pressure.

Belluzi et al JACC 2009;53:24

Page 25: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid
Page 26: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

Randomized clinical trials of RAS I in AF Primary Prevention

Trial Pat N Drug Results

CAPP2 10985 Captopril/St No Diff

STOP-2 6628 Enal-Lisi/St No Diff

LIFE 8851 Losart/Ateno 3,5 vs 5,3%

HOPE 8335 Ramip/Plac No Diff

VALUE 13760 Vals/Amlod 3,7 vs 4,3%

Page 27: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

Randomized clinical trials of RAS I in AF Secondary Prevention

Author/year Pat N Drug Results

Van den Bergh

18 Lisinopril/Plac Sig reduction

Madrid 154 Irb+Amio/Amio Sig Reduction

Ueng 145 Ena+Amio/Amio Sig Reduction

Tveit 137 Cande/Plac Sig reduction

Fogari 222 Losar+Amio/Amlo+Amio

Sig Reduction

Yin 177 Losar+Amio/ Peri+Amio/Amio

Sig Reduction

Page 28: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

APD

EEF

SR

AF

SR

AF

ACTION POTENTIAL

ANATOMICAL

Fybrosis

Hypertrophy

Inflammation

Reduced AERP

Loss of AERP adaptation to rate

Inflammation and AF

Page 29: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid
Page 30: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

Statins for AF

Page 31: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

Statins for AF

Page 32: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

Statins for AF

Page 33: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

Review of randomized clinical trials of Statins to prevent Post Thoracic Surgery AF

Author/year Design n Findings

Auer/04 Prospective 253 Sig reduction

Amar/05 Prospective 131 Sig Reduction

Marin/06 Prospective 234 Sig Reduction

Patty/06 Double blind 200 Sig Reduction

Chello/06 Doble blind 40 Sig reduction

Ozaydin/07 Prospective 362 Sig ReductionVirani/08 Retrospective 4044 No Diff

Letsburapa/08 Prospective 555 Sig Reduction

Page 34: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

Steroids for AF Prevention• Double blind study with 104 patients• Persistent AF. After Cardioversion. High

PCR levels. • Profafenone + 16mg-4 mg

Methylprednisolone vs Placebo. Follow-up mean 23 months.

• Recurrent AF was reduced from 50-9,6%• Permanent AF was reduced from 29-2%.• Significant reduction also of PCR levels.

•Dernellis et al Eur H J 2004; 25:1100-07

Page 35: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

Steroids for AF Prevention

Page 36: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

Clinical Trials with PUFA

• Mozaffarian/04 4815 12 years ++• Calo/05 160 days ++• Frost/05 47949 5,7 years --• Brouwer/06 5284 6,4 years --

Author/Year Publication Patients Follow up Results

Page 37: Prof. C. Moro, Madrid

Conclusions

• ACE`s and ARB´s are equipotent tools to fight against AF in primary and secondary prevention .

• Lone AF may also be treated with them. (Not recognized yet in Guidelines).

• The RR for AF prevention with those drugs is higher in patients with high arryhthmogenic risk.

• Steroids should not be used in AF prevention due to its plural and potent adverse effects.

• Statins are useful to prevent post surgical AF.• PUFA effects for AF prevention show controversial

results.


Top Related