Download - Project Execution - Ketan Kapadia
PANORA infrastructure
project management engineering quantity survey
PANORA infrastructure
Building Project LeadershipProject Management and Implementation
About Panora
About Panoraorganisational structure
¡ Panora Infrastructure was established in December 1995, having
derived its existence from the Architectural Group of K. G. Kapadia
& Company which was founded in 1965 in Mumbai
¡ Provides services in Project Management, Quantity Survey (QS)
and Engineering.
¡ With offices located in Mumbai, Pune, Hyderabad and London, Panora
employs a dedicated group of more than 80 professionals; with Senior
Management having been with the firm for more than 10 years
¡ Worked with numerous architects and engineers of international
repute including DP Architects, Palmer & Turner, WSP (UK), etc.
¡ Successfully executed over 150 projects with a built-up area of about
15 million sq.ft. across India, USA, Cameroon, UK, Dubai
¡ Arkk Consulting, a partnership for Utilities and MEP Design Engineering
was setup in 2007
¡ Box – India, a project based strategic partnership was setup in 2009 for
QS and Cost Management Services with Box Associates, UK with a
focus on Hotels and Hospitality sector.
About Panoraa brief profile
PANORA consortium
PANORA infrastructureproject management
ARKKconsultingMEP consultants
BOX India
BOX Associates, UK
PANORA
Ketan Kapadia Panora Infrastructure - Managing Director / Arkk Consulting – Partner
B.E. (Civil), Mumbai University
M. Engg (Structures), Cornell University, USA
MBA (Finance & Operations), University of Pittsburgh, USA
Over 15 years experience in Design Engineering and Project Management in India and abroad. Skills include
Execution Planning, Contract Negotiations and Contract Structuring. Has significant Experience in various
aspects of managing complex projects.
About Panorakey personnel
Rajendra N Joshi Panora Infrastructure - Executive Director /
B.E. (Mechanical), Mumbai University
A MEP Specialist with over 20 years of experience in Design Engineering and Project Management in India
and abroad.
As Design Engineering Head (West Zone) at VOLTAS for 14 years, worked on numerous complex projects
for hotels, hospitals and public projects. Worked as General Manager (Projects) in South Africa and
implemented 4 major hospital projects. Currently working on Taj Gateway at Vashi, Bhandup, Hyderabad,
Pan Card Hotel Kolkatta, Chariot Hotels Puri, Deora's Jodhpur.
Primarily responsible for the managing the Utilities Design Coordination and related QA / QC issues.
Arkk Consulting - Partner
Significant Projects
All areas in square feet
Kotak Mahindra Bank Office Interiors
Enam Finance, BKC Construction and Office Interiors
BNP Paribas, Goregaon Office Interiors
Ichibaan Honda, BKC Construction & Common Area Interiors
Leo Burnett, Parel Construction and interiors
Nicholas Piramal, Parel Office interiors at Peninsula
Linkway Honda Powai Construction and Interiors Workshop
Indian Card Clothing Construction & Common area Interiors
KMC, Hyderabad Construction and Interiors
Fort House, Mumbai Construction & Common Area Interiors
500,000
200,000
87,000
200,000
35,000
150,000
100,000
100,000
150,000
150,000
Commercial significant projects
Commercial significant projects
Kotak Mahindra Bank HeadquartersDindoshi, Goregaon, Mumbai
Offices and Mission Critical Data Centre
Total BUA 500,000 sq.ft. (62,000 sq.ft. x 8 levels)Duration 2008 - 09
Grand PalladiumKalina, Mumbai
Commercial Offices
Total BUA 200,000 sft Duration 2007 - 2009Consultants WSP (UK)
All areas in square feet
Crossroads at Tardeo 250,000
SOBO Central at Tardeo 250,000
CR2 Mall at Nariman Point 150,000
Elpro Mall at Chinchawad, Pune 725,000
Piramyd 60,000 (7 locations across India)
Shoppers Stop Pune, Aurangabad, Chennai, Mysore, Ghatkopar
Blue Foods + Pan Foods 10 locations across India
D Mart Kalyan, Virar, Pune (Aundh)
KMC Retail Hyderabad 100,000
McDonalds Multiple Locations
Retailsignificant projects
Retailsignificant projects
CrossroadsHaji Ali, Mumbai
Shopping Mall
Total BUA 250,000 sq.ft.Duration 1996 - 1999Renovated in 2009 as SOBO Central
CR2Nariman Point, Mumbai
Shopping Mall, Multiplex, Car Park
Total BUA 250,000 sq.ft.Duration 2001 - 2004
All areas in square feet
Balkrishna Tires Ltd. BKT Bhuj BKT (Siyaram Group)
Prakash Mirror Residential + Rehab, Tardeo Anchor Group
Luxury Residential Ravi, Breach Candy Anchor Group
Sagardeep Residential, Walkeshwar Anchor Group
Luxury Residential Tower + Rehab, Worli Saumya Buildcon
MIG Residential Tower, Parel Rohan Lifescapes
Rehab Building, Bhuleshwar Rohan Lifescapes
9A Luxury Residential Tower, Breach Candy Khemchand Kothari
Vasant Vilas - Single User Residence Kishore Dalal
Single User Residence at Laburnam Road Jaydev Mody
400,000
700,000
200,000
200,000
700,000
80,000
80,000
200,000
20,000
25,000
Residentialsignificant projects
Residentialsignificant projects
Luxury Residential TowerWorli, Mumbai
250m high. Rehab tower + school
Total BUA 700,000 sq.ft.Duration 2008 - 2014 (scheduled)
Vasant VilasBabulnath, Mumbai
Single User Residence
Total BUA 20,000 sq.ft.
Cinpharm at Douala, Cameroun Large vol. Parenterals, Betalactum, Gen. Form.
ZYG Pharma, Pithampur, Indore Steroidal / Non St. Ointments, Lotions, Cream
Omni-actives, Hinjewadi Nutraceuticals
Red River Pharma LLC, Louisiana, USA General Formulations
ADF Foods Ltd., Nadiad Frozen Foods Factory
Balkrishna Tires Ltd., Dombivali Tyre Moulding Unit
Cable Corporation of India, Nashik Cable Manufacturing unit
Siyaram Ltd., Tarapur Textile Manufacturing Unit
Siyaram Ltd., Daman Textile Manufacturing Unit
Warehouse Complex, Bhandup Steel Suppliers Ltd.
Industrialsignificant projects
Industrialsignificant projects
Autohangar MercedesMumbai, Nagpur
State-of-th-art automotive showroom, workshop
Total BUA 5,000 - 130,000 sq.ft.
Cable Corporation of IndiaSinnar, Nashik
Cable Manufacturing Unit
Hospitalitysignificant projects
ThunderbirdDaman, Gujarat
5-star hotel and Casino with 180 keys
Total BUA 360,000 sq.ft.Duration 12 months
Taj GatewayKolhapur
4 star hotel with 120 keys
Total BUA 200,000 sq.ft.Duration 24 months
Project Management
Design Development and Tendering1
Architecture, Engineering
Design and Budgetary Studies
Coordination Meeting with the
Design Team and Decisions with
Clients
Structuring of contracts and
Finalize Specifications
Pre-qualification of Tenderers
Tendering Process
Pre-tender Meetings
Float Tender
Negotiations and Award
Construction Stage
Release of Construction
Documents
Mobilization of Contractors and
establish Site Management
Processes
Construction Management
Procedures
Cost & Quality control
Procedures
Bill Checking, Certification and
Contract Management
Handover to Operations
Prepare and complete Snag List
Collate all As Built Drawings and
Handover Documents
Final Bills and No Claims
Certificates from Contractors
Hand over various aspects of
the project to operations team
2 3
Project Managementan overview of the role of a PMC
Case Study 01shuttering systems
aluminum v/s conventional
Aluminum Formworkthe future of construction
Advantages of Aluminum Formwork for the super structure of the tower
Faster Speed of Construction
Reduces internal brickwork and plastering
Superior Quality of in-situ casting of structure and transverse walls in a continuous operation
Increased Carpet area by 2-3% by avoiding internal plastering
Limitations of Aluminum Formwork
The system does not allow for modifications to the structure and floor layouts
High initial capital cost. Employing the aluminum formwork for greater number of repetitions helps distribute the investment and reduces the effective cost of the build.
Aluminum Formworkthe future of construction
Aluminum Formworkthe future of construction
Feasibility of Aluminum Shuttering an Analytical Comparison
2 residential projects analysed to ascertain the viability of Aluminum Shuttering
Project A9 Towers, 20 storeys each + 2 level Podium
Project B4 Towers, 46 storeys each + 3 level Podium
Aluminum Formworkthe future of construction
Project A9 Towers, 20 storeys each + 2 level Podium
Scenario 1Build using Aluminum Shuttering
The build is proposed in 3 phases, using 3 Sets of Aluminum Shuttering after calculating the viability of the repetitions.
This programme might prove to be inflexible.
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
AB
C D E F G
HICLUBAB
C D E F G
HICLUB
Using Conventional Shuttering the towers could be built in 2 phases making this programme more flexible.
Completion of the RCC casting earlier allows for finishing each tower earlier
AB
C D E F G
HICLUB
Aluminum Formworkthe future of construction
Project A9 Towers, 20 storeys each + 2 level Podium
Scenario 2Build using Conventional Shuttering
Phase 1
Phase 2
Aluminum Formworkthe future of construction
Design Coordination and Tendering
Construction
Handover
Total Completion Time
3 months
37 months
2 months
42 months
3 months
33 months
2 months
38 months (-4 months)
Task Aluminum Shuttering Conventional Shuttering
Flexibility for modifications in Design
Finish of RCC surface
External Plaster
Internal Plaster
Brickwork
Relatively Inflexible
Relatively Superior
Not Required
Not Required
Comparatively Reduced
Relatively Flexible
Ply shuttering required
Required
Required
Required
NOTE:Though individual building time-frame using aluminum shuttering may be lower, the overall project time-frame could be lower in case of conventional shuttering due to the flexible phasing programme.
Aluminum Formworkthe future of construction
Project B4 Towers, 46 storeys each + 3 level Podium
Phase 2
Phase 3Podium A
A
B
Phase 4Podium B
D
Phase 1
C
Aluminum Shuttering
Average Cycle time per slab is 10 days.
The first slab requires 20-25 days for the initial assembly.
Total time for RCC is 500 days
Conventional Shuttering
Average Cycle time per slab is 14 days.
The first slab requires 30-35 days for the initial assembly.
Total time for RCC is 682 day
Would require almost 6 months more
Aluminium Formwork
Slab Cycle Time (days)
ConventionalFormwork
Floor Rise Level 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 terrace total
22 15 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 500
35 20 15 15 15 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 682
Aluminum Formworkthe future of construction
Aluminum Formworkthe future of construction
CONCLUSION
Project B is very well suited for using Aluminum Shuttering based on the Phasing program
as required by the Clients and the overall financial viability of the System.
For Project A the conventional shuttering system is more suited due to its additional
flexibility which allows for the project to get completed 4 months earlier as compared to
Aluminum Shuttering.
Case Study 02building with structural steel
Grand Palladiumbuilding with structural steel
Commercial Offices for
Kalina, BKC, Mumbai
Architect Kamal Malik
Engineers WSP, UK
Total BUA 200,000 sq.ft.
Duration 2007 - 2009
LEEDS applied for Gold Rating
GMS Construction
Grand Palladiumbuilding with structural steel
A unique project designed by Architect Kamal Malik and engineered by WSP, UK uses High Yield Strength Structural Steel from CORUS for the main members and the skin truss supporting the cantilevered slabs at all levels. The façade is clad with KALZIP.
Major challenges at GMS included managing the Design Process which was extremely complex, planning logistics of building with steel within a busy urban area in the shortest possible time.
2200 MT of High Yield strength Structural Steel was used.
Material supplied primarily by CORUS and JSW.
Grand Palladiumbuilding with structural steel
Advantages of Structural Steel in Architecture
Maintains its strength indefinitely- does not deteriorate with age like timber and concrete, provided its surface is protected from corrosion.
Very strong and flexible. The best material for bridges and skyscrapers.
Can be recycled.
Structures can be prefabricated in large sections, and lifted into place with cranes and bolted together- buildings can be erected quickly.
Versatile- Radical architecture is possible using steel.
Heavy and thus expensive to transport, susceptible to corrosion.
Has a high expansion rate in changing temperatures, and this must be allowed for in the engineering. In conditions of repeated stress and changing temperatures, can suffer fatigue and cracks, and more corrosion.
Energy intensive to produce.
Drawbacks of Structural Steel in Architecture
Grand Palladiumbuild sequence planning
S c h e d u le dS ta tu s
(R e c e iv e d )
R e c e ip t
D a te .E re c te d O n .
1 S TE -1 4 B 1 1 2F a b ric a tio n d e ta i l o f B e a m
0 1 3 0 .3 0 ------ R e c e iv e d . 2 2 -O c t-0 8 2 7 -O c t-0 8 1 4 -O c t-0 8
2 S TE -1 4 B 1 1 5F a b ric a tio n d e ta i l o f B e a m
0 1 8 0 .2 0 ------ R e c e iv e d . 2 2 -O c t-0 8 2 7 -O c t-0 8 1 4 -O c t-0 8
3 S TE -1 4 B 1 1 6F a b ric a tio n d e ta i l o f B e a m
0 1 3 3 .0 0 ------ R e c e iv e d . 2 2 -O c t-0 8 2 7 -O c t-0 8
1 S TE -1 4 B 1 3 R e c e iv e d . 1 2 -S e p -0 8
2 S TE -1 4 B 5F a b ric a tio n d e ta i l o f B e a m
R e c e iv e d . 1 5 -S e p -0 8 2 0 -S e p -0 8
3 S TE -1 4 B 8 2F a b ric a tio n d e ta i l o f B e a m
0 1 8 1 .5 0 ------ R e c e iv e d . 1 2 -S e p -0 8 1 7 -S e p -0 8 1 6 -S e p -0 8
4 S TE -1 4 B 8 3F a b ric a tio n d e ta i l o f B e a m
0 1 7 7 .1 0 ------ R e c e iv e d . 2 6 -S e p -0 8 1 -O c t-0 8 1 1 -O c t-0 8
5 S TE -1 4 B 9 0F a b ric a tio n d e ta i l o f B e a m
0 1 5 5 .4 0 ------ R e c e iv e d . 2 6 -S e p -0 8 1 -O c t-0 8
6 S TE -1 4 B 9 1F a b ric a tio n d e ta i l o f B e a m
0 1 8 3 .7 0 ------ R e c e iv e d . 7 -S e p -0 8 1 2 -S e p -0 8
7 S TE -1 4 C 1 2 -2 R e c e iv e d . 2 5 -O c t-0 8 3 0 -O c t-0 8
8 S TE -1 4 F R 1F a b ric a tio n d e ta i l o f F ra m e (2 S hts )
1 1 1 5 5 0 .0 0 ------ R e c e iv e d 2 9 -S e p -0 8
9 S TE -1 4 F R 1 4F a b ric a tio n d e ta i l o f F ra m e
0 1 6 6 .2 0 ------ R e c e iv e d . 2 6 -S e p -0 8 1 -O c t-0 8 1 1 -O c t-0 8
1 0 S TE -1 4 F R 1 8F a b ric a tio n d e ta i l o f F ra m e
0 1 9 7 .3 0 ------ R e c e iv e d . 2 6 -S e p -0 8 1 -O c t-0 8 1 1 -O c t-0 8
1 1 S TE -1 5 B 4 1F a b ric a tio n d e ta i l o f B e a m
0 1 4 3 4 .1 ------ R e c e iv e d . 1 0 -O c t-0 8
T a rg e t F o r
E re c tio n (R 2 )
T a rg e t D a te
F o r R e c e ip t A t
S ite .
F a b ric a tio n T o n n a g e
(K g .)Q ty
E re c tio n S ta tu sS R
N OD R G N O . T IT L E
L A T E S T
R E V
Typical Build Planning sheet
Grand Palladiumerection sequence simulation
Grand Palladiumerection sequence simulation
Grand Palladiumerection sequence simulation
Grand Palladiumerection sequence simulation
Grand Palladiumerection sequence simulation
Grand Palladiumerection sequence simulation
Grand Palladiumerection sequence simulation
Grand Palladiumerection sequence simulation
Grand Palladiumbuild sequence
Grand Palladiumbuild sequence
Grand Palladiumbuild sequence
Grand Palladiumbuilding with structural steel
Thank You
Contact
Ketan Kapadia [email protected] M +91-9820029010
t +91-22-40250100 / 24961071-2 f +91-22-24960489
www.panora-india.com
mumbai 4 sumer kendra, pandurang budhkar marg, worli, mumbai 400018 india
mumbai pune hyderabad london