Download - Public Governance Oecd
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 1
Module C: Social contract, good local governance and
public participation
1. Introduction
1.1Aim of module
To increase understanding of the principles and practice of good local governance
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 2
Introduction (cont)
• Explore implications of decentralization for central-local relations
• Understand relationships between local government and other local actors
• Understand concept of governance + principles of good local governance
• Be aware of strategies and tools for strengthening citizen-local government relationship
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 3
Introduction (cont)
1.2 Structure of the day
2. Formal representative politics: rhetoric, reality and potential
3. Widening political engagement – participation and accountability
4. Community development & local govt
5. Tools & sources of guidance
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 4
2. Formal representative politics: rhetoric, reality and
potential2.1 Introduction
Purpose: to examine whether local democracy results in
– more effective & responsive local government
– voice for citizens, especially the poor
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 5
2.2 Central-local relations
• Degree of autonomy related to– Constitution and legal basis for local government– Political motives of center + role and organization
of local politics• Enhance local responsiveness + accountability• Counterbalance central power• More effective & efficient service delivery
– Resource base
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 6
2.2 Central-local relations (cont)
• Degrees of autonomy– High – capacity to initiate + freedom
from oversight– Medium – either capacity to initiate +
oversight or little power to initiate but little oversight
– Low – no capacity to initiate, strong central control
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 7
2.2 Central-local relations (cont)
• Central government attitudes vary• Arguments for retaining central control e.g.
– Universal provision + redistribution– Universal standards or content– Central backup/specialized services– Professional staff– Achieving sectoral goals– Resources not evenly distributed
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 8
2.3 When is DD effective & responsive to the poor?
• Has recent DD been developmentally effective + responsive to the poor?
• In what circumstances?
• With what characteristics?
• Recent research comparing experience finds often not, but sometimes is – when and why?
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 9
2.3 When is DD effective & responsive to the poor? (cont)
i. Central government motivation– Build alliances + local elites – some
powers, so may be effective, but unlikely to be pro-poor
– Circumvent local elites to achieve poverty reduction – pro-poor if central backing
– Fear local challenges so resists DD – limited powers, benefits mostly captured by local elites
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 10
2.3 When is DD effective & responsive to the poor? (cont)
ii. Local socio-political structures• Elite capture common?• Increases voice of middle income• But
– elite capture not inevitable– Composition & interests of elite?
e.g. compare Botswana and Cote d’Ivoire (Boxes 1 and 2)
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 11
2.3 When is DD effective & responsive to the poor? (cont)
iii. The design of political arrangements for decentralization influences
• Scope for political participation• Nature of representation• Likelihood of responsiveness• Accountability• Who holds power – individual, group,
dispersed?
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 12
2.3 When is DD effective & responsive to the poor? (cont)
iv. Admin & fiscal arrangements • Resourcing critical – stable, predictable central-
local transfers + local revenue generation• Role of central government – control, supervision,
staffing, technical support (balanced with autonomy)
• Hierarchy of levels + clear allocation roles to– Ensure resources + expertise available to local
level– Sub-local units to increase responsiveness
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 13
2.3 When is DD effective & responsive to the poor? (cont)
v. Institutionalization
• Stability over 10-15 years
• Successive elections
• Development of capacity
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 14
2.4 The characteristics of local democratic politics
• Political structures & organization– Electoral arrangements– Location of executive control– Accountability mechanisms
• Influence– Scope for political participation– Responsiveness + effectiveness– Accountability
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 15
2.4 The characteristics of local democratic politics (cont)
Design of local electoral systema) Election of representatives
– Ward-based vs party list (see Boxes 1 & 2)
– Can and do all residents vote? Who is less likely to vote and why?
– What is the basis for representation? Exercise 1 – what do you understand by
‘representation’?
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 16
2.4 The characteristics of local democratic politics (cont)
a) Election of representatives (cont)– Can all citizens stand for political office?– Does the social composition of legislatures
reflect city/district population?
b) Rules on terms of office– Single short term – encourages short termism– Longer, multiple – encourage reform + longer
term initiatives?
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 17
2.4 The characteristics of local democratic politics (cont)
c) Institutionalization
– Are elections held regularly?
– Is there a peaceful alternation of power?
– Are local elections independent of national elections?
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 18
2.5 Issues of executive control and accountability
• Single or plural executive– Plural – more councilors participate, may be
indecisive– Single (e.g. elected mayor) – clearer leadership,
fewer checks & balances
• Elected or appointed• Executive and/or managerial powers
independent of legislature• Appointing senior staff - confidence
appointments?
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 19
2.5 Issues of executive control and accountability
Accountability• Requirements for transparency?• Who should exercise scrutiny?• Who should be held to account?• By whom?• Reasons for accountability failure?• How can accountability be improved?• Issues? Procedures + finance, or + gender
equity, social justice, environmental impact?
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 20
2.5 Issues of executive control and accountability (cont)
Transparency
• Information available + timely + accurate
• Between admin, executive & legislature
• Between local govt & citizens
• Right to Information legislation?
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 21
2.5 Issues of executive control and accountability (cont)
Accountability mechanisms
• Internal (horizontal accountability)
– Rules and regulations
– Internal reviews & audits
– Central govt supervision
– Merit-based recruitment & reward
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 22
2.5 Issues of executive control and accountability (cont)
• External (vertical)– Executive-based controls (admin to
political executive)– Does the executive represent the interests
of citizens or limited/personal interests?– Legislature-based controls (admin + exec
to elected council/assembly)– Has it legal powers + political authority?
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 23
2.5 Issues of executive control and accountability (cont)
• External accountability (cont)– Central govt regulation– Is there an indep audit office?– Does central govt encourage good
performance, collude with bad practice, or constrain local govt?
– Electoral system– Is there wide & regular participation?
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 24
2.5 Issues of executive control and accountability (cont)
• External mechanisms (cont)- Is there ‘neighborhood level govt + resources (see
the kebeles of Addis Ababa – Box 3)
– Ventilation of grievances (e.g. regular public hearings, ombudsman, complaints system, media publicity)
– Are there complaints systems & are they effective?
– Can all get redress for grievances?
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 25
2.5 Issues of executive control and accountability (cont)
• External mechanisms (cont)– Campaigning by civil society orgs– Do GROs have wide membership?– Can/do NGOs speak on behalf of the poor?– Judiciary-based controls– Does court system have capacity?– Can all citizens access the court system?
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 26
Exercise 2: the strengths and weaknesses of local
government
• What are the strengths of the local government system in which you work?
• What are its weaknesses?NB give most consideration to political aspects
– Relationships with central govt– Local electoral system– Composition & functioning of legislature– Location & exercise of executive power– Arrangements for ensuring accountability
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 27
2.6 The vicious and virtuous circles of ineffective/effective
local govt• Vicious circle of ineffective undemocratic local
govtLittle autonomyUnresponsive and lacking capacityFew benefits so limited political
participationLocal politics left to the eliteLost legitimacy, increased disillusionment
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 28
The virtuous circle of effective & democratic local govt
Local political processes + wide political participation
Opportunities for direct democracyAccountability mechanismsCapacity + autonomySignificant tasks + sufficient resourcesCentral govt backing, good central-local
relations
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 29
2.7 Principles of local governance
• Government = political & admin apparatus of the state, which guides, controls, regulates, decides
• Governance = governing through relationships between state/civil society, rulers/ruled– Interdependence, interaction + joint action– Shared values and purpose which cannot
be achieved by govt (or civil society, citizens) alone
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 30
2.7 Principles of local governance (cont)
• Democratization • Re-allocation roles & responsibilities • Resistance from some, but• Recognition of advantages: if they
pass on appropriate tasks, andconcentrate on getting right the things that only
public sector organizations can do, then if improved service delivery results, increased
legitimacy and support
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 31
2.8 Actors in the local political system
• Who are the key political actors?– Politicians + political parties– Public sector agencies– Traditional authority structures– NGOs – variety of possible aims– Trade unions– CSOs– Citizens
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 32
2.8 Actors in the local political system (cont)
• What are their political practices?– Voting– Debate, agenda setting– Decision making– Lobbying, demand-making– Negotiation, bargaining– Forming alliances, cooperation– Resistance, protest, non-compliance
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 33
2.8 Actors in the local political system (cont)
• What explains these political practices?– Values– Understanding of political rights and
system– Interests (personal and collective)– Opportunities + constraints provided
by political system
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 34
Exercise C.3: Stakeholder analysis of the local political
systemIn a local political system with which
group members are familiar• Identify the main political actors
(powerful + marginalized)• Identify political interests of each actor• What influence do they have and why? • Which actors have most/least
influence?
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 35
3. Widening political engagement – participation &
accountability3.1 Introduction: participation
Voting = passive citizenship
Participation =
o active citizenship
o power sharing
o end or means
o initiated from above or below
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 36
3.1 The ladder of participation
Type of participation• Persuasion• Mobilization• Consultation• Participation• Collaboration• Collective action/self
management
Action by government
• On residents• for govt purposes• For/with citizens• For/with citizens• With citizens• Neglect or support
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 37
3.2 Strengthening local democracy
a) Local government – autonomy + elections
• Role for central government– Policy frameworks– Minimum standards for basic services– Ensuring equity– Exercising scrutiny to encourage good
performance– Providing selected services
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 38
3.2 Strengthening local democracy (cont)
• Role for central govt (cont)– Legislation – Reformed electoral rules, including elected
executive– Reserved seats (quotas) for under-
represented groups (e.g. Uganda)– Non-govt reps in policy + oversight– Requiring consultation + participation
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 39
3.2 Strengthening local democracy (cont)
b) Effective representation• Civic education ) see Box• Political capacity building ) 7
To• Encourage voting, especially by poor,
women• Encourage citizens to stand for election• Build capacity to use office once elected
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 40
3.2 Strengthening local democracy (cont)
c) Budget analysis• Budgeting by local govt often unrelated to
policy aims, poorly presented and secretive• Result – little useful role for legislature, no role
for citizens (e.g. Uganda Box 8)• Actions
– Improved budgetary practice (Module F)– Budget analysis by NGOs, citizens leading
to pressure for gender awareness, equity, responsiveness to needs of poor
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 41
Exercise C.4: Ways of strengthening local democracy – local needs &
feasibility• Approaches
– Local govt legislation – Civic education & capacity building – Budget analysis
• Are any of these approaches needed in your local situation?
• Would that/those approaches be feasible?
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 42
3.3 Strengthening accountability
• Possibilities
– Government initiatives to improve internal and external accountability
– Civil society initiatives
– Joint initiatives
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 43
3.3 Strengthening accountability (cont)
a) Claiming rights, addressing corruption• Educating the poor in their rights to basic
services/regulations (Boxes 8 FOWODE and 9 Operation Firimbi, Kenya)
• Supporting poor people when they approach or make claims from the bureaucracy (Box 9 Parivartan, Delhi)
• Participatory corruption appraisal + action plan
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 44
3.3 Strengthening accountability (cont)
b) Assessing user satisfaction• Quantitative opinion surveys (Box 11
Report cards)• Qualitative user surveys• ‘naming and shaming’• Pressure through publicity, lobbying,
dialogue• Response?
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 45
3.3 Strengthening accountability (cont)
c) Monitoring and auditing local government performance
• Monitoring govt expenditure – role for NGOs, external scrutiny body + citizen reps
• Monitoring delivery – role for users, residents’ groups (e.g. Uganda – Box 8)
• Auditing quality – role for residents, technically qualified volunteers
• Response?
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 46
Exercise C.5: Applicability of approaches to
strengthening accountability to the local situation
• Approaches to – Reducing effects of corruption on the poor– Assessing user satisfaction to improve service
delivery– Monitoring local govt performance
• In your local situation, which of these would be – Applicable– Feasible
• Identify 1-2 alternative approaches
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 47
3.4 Participatory decision making
See examples from St Louis, Senegal & Nakuru, Kenya in Boxes 13 & 14
Is the city/district strategic development planning process effective?
• Plan to which all public agencies committed?• Known to other development actors?• Being implemented by dev’t control +
allocation funds?
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 48
3.4 Participatory decision making (cont)
• Under regular review for updating?• Prepared & reviewed through consultative or
participatory processes?
• Participatory budgeting in Brazil (see also Box 8 on Uganda)
• Kenya’s new Local Authority Transfer Fund (Box 15)
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 49
Exercise C.6 Analyzing a case study of
participatory decision makingParticipatory budgeting in Brazil• 1. Who participates?• 2. In what are they able to participate?• 3. How do citizens participate?• 4. Could participatory budgeting on the
Brazilian model by used locally? If not, why not?
• 5. What alternative method of increasing participation in budgeting might be feasible?
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 50
Exercise C.6 Analyzing a case study of participatory decision
makingPB in Brazil – contextual factors
explaining success• Political history• Workers’ Party + pro-poor political ideology• Participatory culture• Growing confidence of the poor + women• Decentralization + improved financing of local
govt
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 51
3.4 Participatory decision making (cont)
Factors explaining successful participation• Initiative from politicians or citizens• Attitude of local govt – citizens not beneficiaries• Commitment of local govt + institutionalized into
procedures• Multi-party political system (but not polarized)• Enabling environment: DD + tradition of self-help• Presence of a change agent• Clear benefits for all participants• Capacity building for all actors
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 52
4. Community development and local government
Exercise C.7 What does ‘community’ mean?
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 53
4.1 Introduction: the concept of ‘community’
Issues to be considered in local government -community cooperation for development– Does administrative subdivision or informal
settlement have homogeneous population with common interests?
– Does area have a CBO (or more than one)?– Is there a need for new organizations?– Who are the community leaders & are they
representative and accountable?
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 54
4.1 Introduction: the concept of ‘community’ (cont)
Forms of community participationi. Better educated residents ‘represent’ areaii. Resident local govt officials ‘represent’ areaiii. Consultation – do all have a voice?iv. Area reps sit on board, committee – are they
influential?v. Community (or its leaders) asked to develop
project jointly with external agencyvi. Residents take initiative, seek external support
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 55
Exercise C.8: Resolving conflict
Task of local councilor: to resolve conflict between formal shopkeepers and informal street vendors
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 56
Exercise C.8: Resolving conflict – questions for
discussion• What were the views of the formal
shopkeepers & why were they in conflict with the vendors?
• What were the views of the vendors?• What solutions were you able to come up
with?• What were the difficulties you experienced in
finding a win-win solution?
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 57
4.2 Community participation in decision making & service delivery –
romantic or realistic?Factors resulting in success• Strong + committed leadership for the initiative• Tradition of participation• Developed with not for groups• Larger proportion of population participating• Long time frame• Sustainability considered from beginning• Minimizing time involvement of poor +
providing incentives
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 58
4.2 Community participation in decision making & service delivery –
romantic or realistic? (cont)Motives for participation• Forced to participate ) outcome unlikely• Paid to participate ) to be successful• Incited to participate )
(by reward or sanctions)• Participate voluntarily ) outcome likely to • Initiate participation ) be successful
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 59
4.2 Community participation in decision making & service delivery –
romantic or realistic? (cont)
Obstacles to participation (+ solutions)Within an agency• Centralization - decentralize• Attitudes: recipients not citizens, resist power
sharing, use technical language, don’t value people’s knowledge – develop new attitudes
• Internal systems which don’t reward it – reward working with communities
• Frequent transfer of staff – recognize time needed to build relationships with communities
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 60
4.2 Community participation in decision making & service delivery –
romantic or realistic? (cont)Obstacles within a ‘community’• Lack of organization – local govt or NGO
community workers facilitate organization• Leaders lack skills – capacity building• Factionalism – processes to build consensus
(where impossible working + groups that don’t threaten powerful interests/leaders e.g. women)
• Powerful secure benefits – make info available to all residents
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 61
4.2 Community participation in decision making & service delivery –
romantic or realistic? (cont)Obstacles within society• CBOs seen as a political threat – negotiate
with political actors• Legal hindrances – ensure all residents can
participate• Centralization – decentralize, so scope for
local decision making• External funders hinder – change practices &
requirements
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 62
4.2 Community participation in decision making & service delivery –
romantic or realistic? (cont)Some examplesC.14 Participatory ward development planning
in S AfricaC.15 Local management of PHC in SenegalC.16/17 Communities & municipalities working
together in Dar es Salaam, Dondo (Mozambique) & Burkina Faso
C.18 Community participation in watsan delivery in Luanda
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 63
4.2 Community participation in decision making & service delivery –
romantic or realistic? (cont)Elements of good practice• Motivation + attitudes –
• respect on the part of local govt and communities for skills, views & knowledge of the other
• Willingness to listen• Recognition of social diversity + inclusion
women, disadvantaged groups, minorities• Free flows of information
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 64
4.3 Supporting community participation and development• Support to communities
– Access to financial resources e.g. local development funds
– Capacity building• Support to local authorities
– Capacity building– Autonomy, range of functions, adequate
resources
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 65
Exercise C.9: Approaches to participation in community decision
making & service delivery• Approaches
– Participatory community planning – Participatory service delivery – Support to communities
• Which approaches are relevant to your local situation?
• Which approaches are feasible?• Rank them from most to least useful
Module C: Social Contract, Local Governance and Public Participation 66
5. Conclusion
• Readings• Tools for participation + sources of guidance• Summary of the day – revisit objectives
– Examination of relations citizens-local govt– Obstacles to democratic local govt– Principles + requirements for good local
governance– New ways of working together – strengthening
democracy, accountability and participation