1
Recent Advances at the National Centers for Environmental
Prediction
“Where America’s Climate and Weather Services Begin”
Louis W. UccelliniDirector, NCEP
University of Wisconsin – MadisonOctober 6, 2003
2
Overview
• Define NCEP• Status of Models• Recent Advancements
– Hurricane forecasts– Wave Watch III– QPF– Climate Model
• JCSDA• Future Plans for Community Models
– Ensembles– WRF– ESMF
3
Define NCEP
4
NCEP Center Locations
Space Environment Center Aviation Weather Center
NCEP Central Operations Climate Prediction Center Environmental Modeling Center Hydrometeorological Prediction Center Ocean Prediction Center
Storm Prediction Center
Tropical Prediction Center
5
What Does NCEP Do?
Severe Storm Outlooks Fire Weather Outlooks Weather Forecasts to Day 7 Quantitative Precipitation
Forecasts to 5 days Marine Weather Discussions Model Discussions
Severe Weather Watches Hurricane Watches and
Warnings Aviation Warnings
(Convective, Turbulence, Icing) Climate Forecasts (Weekly to
Seasonal to Interannual) Marine High Seas Forecasts Solar Monitoring –
geomagnetic storm forecasts
Guidance to Support WFO/RFC National Products
Model Development and Applications, including Data AssimilationOcean Models for Climate Prediction; Coastal Ocean Forecast System; Wave ModelsSuper Computer, Workstation and Network Operations
6Contractors/Visiting Scientists: 155
7
Employment Situation
• Employment situation– Total of 375 Civil Servants; 131 contractors; 24 visitors– Currently have 6 Student Interns (SCEP/STEP); 2 volunteers– During the last 12 months
• 33 CS vacancies; 6 SCEPs; • Hired 28 contractors• 7 new visiting scientists• 14 Summer Hires (ORISE, GoHFAS, NOAA Educational
Partnership Programs)
– Projected growth through ’08: 50 – 60 (contractors/visiting scientists/postdocs)
8
Status of Models
9
Computing Capability
Commissioned/Operational IBM Supercomputer in Gaithersburg, MD (June 6, 2003)
$20M/Year $20M/Year InvestmentInvestment
•Receives Over 116 Million Global Observations Daily•Sustained Computational Speed: 450 Billion Calculations/Sec•Generates More Than 5.7 Million Model Fields Each Day•Global Models (Weather, Ocean, Climate)•Regional Models (Aviation, Severe Weather, Fire Weather)•Hazards Models (Hurricane, Volcanic Ash, Dispersion)
10
NCEP Operational ModelsEta
12 km, 60 levels, 84 hrs at 0 , 6, 12 and 18Z
Global Forecast System (GFS)
T254 (~55 km) to 3.5 days (84 hrs), 64 levels
T170 (~75 km) to 7.5 days (180 hrs), 42 levels
T126 (~105 km) to 16 days (384 hrs), 28 levels
16 days (384 hrs)/4 times per day
RUC
20 km, 50 levels
12 hrs at 0,3,6,9,12,15,18,21Z
3 hrs at 1,2,4,5,7,8,10,11,13,14, 16,17,19,20,22,23Z
Climate
T62 (~200 km), 28 levels, 7 months (20 members)
Ensembles
global 10 members at 0 and 12Z
T126 (~105 km) to 84 hrs, T62 (210 km) to 384 hrs
28 levels, 16 days (384 hrs)
regional 10 members at 0 and 12Z
48 km, 45 levels, 63 hrs from 9 and 21Z
Wave Model
global - 1.25 x 1.0 deg lat/lon
Alaskan Regional - .5 x .25 deg lat/lon
Western North Atlantic - .25 x .25 deg lat/lon
Eastern North Pacific - .25 x .25 deg lat/lon
1 level, 168 hrs/4 times per day
North Atlantic Hurricane (seasonal)
North Pacific Hurricane (seasonal)
.25 x .25 deg lat/lon
1 level
78 hours/4 times per day
GFDL Hurricane Model
coupled ocean-atmosphere
Two nests (0.5, 1/6 deg lat/lon)
42 levels
126 hrs at 00, 06, 12 and 18Z
Status of Distributed ModelsThe Workstation Eta
A means for providing real-time high-resolution numerical model data at the local level
Domain can be placed anywhere on the globe: size and resolution determined by user
Non-NWS use encouraged. About 135 international requests from countries such as China and Brazil (both with >5 users), Turkey and Thailand.
Over 145 domestic users: WFOs, researchers and students at U.S universities
http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/wrkstn_eta/
12
Tiling for Higher Resolution Applications
• 6 High resolution
(all 8 km except 10 km Alaska) Window nested runs - once per day to 48 hours
13
Tiling for Higher Resolution Applications
• Fire weather runs – 8
km NMM runs on demand in one of 26 areas of coverage, each about 900 km square up to 4/day
• Dispersion models run on demand using 4 km NMM for Homeland Security
14
Recent Advancements
15
16
CDAS/Reanl vs GFSNH/SH 500Hpa day 5
Anomaly Correlation (20-80 N/S)
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
YEAR
An
om
aly
Co
rre
lati
on
NH GFSSH GFSNH CDAS/ReanlSH CDAS/Reanl
17
Recent Advancements: Hurricanes
18
NHC Yearly-averaged Atlantic Track Forecast Errors
19
TPC Atlantic 72 hr Track Forecast Errors
20
Hurricane MichelleOctober 29 - November 5, 2001
21
Hurricane Claudette5-Day Hurricane Forecast
Radar 10:45 AMJuly 15, 2003
Error (nm) 12 h 24 h 36 h 48 h 72 h 96 h 120 h
OFCL 35 57 84 112 128 135 147
GFDL 32 56 88 121 163 233 273
GFS 38 66 93 121 193 218 301
# of cases 25 24 22 19 14 8 8
Hurricane Isabel
Thursday, 9/18/0312 PM EDT5-day forecast
3-day forecast
23
NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER ATLANTIC TRACK FORECAST ERRORS
NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER ATLANTIC TRACK FORECAST ERRORS
12 24 36 48 72
Forecast Period (hours)
0
100
200
300
400
500
Err
or
(nau
tica
l mile
s)
1964-1973
1984-1993
1974-1983
1994-2002
Isabelprelim.
24
NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER ATLANTIC TRACK FORECAST ERRORS
NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER ATLANTIC TRACK FORECAST ERRORS
12 24 36 48 72 96 120
Forecast Period (hours)
0
100
200
300
400
500
Err
or
(nau
tica
l mile
s)
1964-1973
1984-1993
1974-1983
1994-2002
Isabelprelim.
25
Recent Advancements: Wave Watch III
26
• New model design with emphasis on transparency, vectorization and parallelization (plug compatible, portable).
• More general governing transport equation, allowing for later full coupling with ocean models.
• Improved propagation schemes (third order).• Improved physics integration scheme (follows small
time scale evolution more closely, yet more economical than conventional schemes).
• Improved physics of wave growth and decay.
WAVEWATCH III
new model required
27
Operational Configurations
• NOAA WAVEWATCH III officially replaced all previous operational wave models at NCEP on March 9, 2000.• Global model at 1°x1.25° latitude-longitude resolution from
78°S to 78°N, run four times daily for a 168h forecast.• Nested regional models for Alaskan Waters (0.25°x 0.5°)
and Western North Atlantic and Eastern North Pacific (0.25°x 0.25°) for same time frame.
• All models use GFS and ice edge information from NCEP's operational ice analysis. A special GFDL driven version of the Western North Atlantic and Eastern North Pacific wave model are run for hurricane wave prediction (72h forecast).
28
Isabel 18/9/2003, 12 UTCnowcast
48h forecast24h forecast
12h forecast
Intensity and location of forecast waves consistent and confirmed by altimeter and buoy observations. At 48h forecast lower wave heights due to earlier landfall.
wave height 50+ ft (45+ ft)
Isabel at Field Research Facility Duck NC
pictures from US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Research Facility webcam
9/18 14:00 EDT 9/29 14:00 EDT
Maximum observed wave height at the end of the pier 26.6ft, which is roughly the maximum sustainable wave height for the local water depth. Wave height 2 miles offshore reported up to 49 ft.
30
Recent Advancements: QPF
31
32
33
34
Day 1 0.5 .597 Dec ‘02
1.0 .483 Dec ‘02
2.0 .332 Nov ‘98
3.0 .374 Feb ‘81
Update 0.5 .557 Dec’02
1.0 .423 Dec ‘02
2.0 .286 Dec ‘89
Day 2 0.5 .507 Dec ‘02
1.0 .421 Jan ‘02
Day 3 0.5 .393 Jan ‘02
1.0 .331 Jan ‘02
All Time HPC QPF Threat Score Records
35
Recent Advancements: Climate Model
36
Climate Model
• Current operational climate model– 200 km, 28 levels, runs to 7 months each month– Linked to SSTs in Pacific basin only
• Improved operational climate model– Fully coupled ocean-atmosphere system
• NCEP operational Global Forecast System (GFS) atmospheric model
– 200 km resolution, 64 levels, model top 0.2 mb
• MOM3 ocean model (GFDL)– 100 km resolution, 40 levels, 30 km between 10 deg N and 10 deg S– Global; between 65 deg N and 75 deg S– Global Ocean Data Assimilation System (GODAS)
37
Coupled Model Simulation ENSO SST cycles
Nino 3.4 SSTAnomalies
Simulated 2002-2040 (top)
Observed 1965-2003(bottom)
38
Coupled Model Simulation SST Interannual Variability
Observed
64 Level Atm
28 Level Atm
39
Examples of ENSO eventsSimulated El Nino 2015-2016 Simulated La Nina 2017-18
Real El Nino 1982-1983 Real La Nina 1988-1989
Initial States
Amip – long model run
Reanl2 – reanalysis Casst – constructed analog (emp. Tool)
Cmp14 – operational
Initial States
Amip – long model run
Reanl2 – reanalysis Casst – constructed analog (emp. Tool)
Cmp14 – operational
42
JCSDA
43
Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilationcreated July 2, 2001
Increase uses of current satellite data in NWP models Develop the hardware/software systems needed to assimilate data from
the advanced satellite sensors Advance the common NWP models and data assimilation infrastructure Develop common fast radiative transfer system Assess the impacts of data from advanced satellite sensors on weather
and climate predictions Reduce the average time for operational implementations of new
satellite technology from two years to one
Accelerate use of research and operational satellite data in operational numerical prediction models
Goals:
44
JCSDA Partners
NASA/Goddard
Data Assimilation Office
NASA/Goddard
Seasonal InterannualPrediction Project
NOAA/NESDIS
Office of Research & Applications
NOAA/OAR
Office of Weather and Air Quality
NOAA/NCEP
Environmental Modeling Center
US Navy
Office of Naval Research
US Air Force
Air Weather Agency
(XOW)
Management
Oversight
Board
45
JCSDA Organizational Structure
NASA & NOAA
Joint Center StaffCenter Director: Stephen Lord (Acting)
Deputy Directors: Fuzhong Weng - NESDIS L. P. Riishogjaard – NASA
P. Phoebus – NRLTechnical Liaisons:
DAO – D. DeeEMC – J. Derber
NSIPP – M. RieneckerOWAQR – A. Gasiewski
ORA – D. TarpleyNavy – N. Baker
USAF – M. McAteeProgram Support: Christine Brown
George Ohring (NESDIS)
AdvisoryPanel
Rotating Chair
ScienceSteering
Committee
Joint Oversight Board of Directors:NOAA NCEP: L. Uccellini (Chair)
Goddard ESD : F. EinaudiNOAA ORA: M. Colton
NOAA OWAQR: D. RogersNavy: S. Chang, R. HillyerUSAF: J. Lanicci, M. Farrar
46
JCSDA: Recent Accomplishments Land emissivity model tested in NCEP operational
models Positive impacts with AMSU data over land (May,2002) Operational implementation (October, 2002)
Enabled use of microwave radiances over land
New Data used in NCEP operational models SSM/I, TRMM microwave imager precipitation estimates (October, 2001) SSM/I, AMSU cloud liquid water (May, 2001) GOES-10 IR radiances (February, 2001) QuikSCAT data (January, 2002)
47
Ongoing Activities Preparation for AIRS
Fast radiative model (OPTRAN), documented, delivered, and installed in experimental NCEP global analysis
Prototype cloud detection algorithm and Quality Control developed Data assessment began November 16, 2002
AIRS Targeted Observations Study Winter Storms Reconnaissance cases Test impact of targeted observations Test AIRS impacts with difference schemes Test assimilation techniques (data weighting)
Assessment of AMSR-E Products Acquire AMSR-E products in BUFR format (SST, wind speeds, sea ice concentration) Evaluate product quality Run initial forecast experiments with products Acquire AMSR-E radiances
48
Ongoing Activities (cont) Surface emissivity model upgrade for snow and ice
applications New algorithm for SST retrievals
Reduced spatial and time noise Uses OPTRAN for radiative transfer Extension to microwave instruments, AIRS Aerosol effects once in OPTRAN
Preparation for GPS occultation data NSF, NESDIS sponsored Post Docs Collaboration between NASA, NCEP, NESDIS, NCAR
Assimilation of Polar Winds
49
Ongoing Activities (cont)JCSDA Announcement of Opportunity
1. Improve radiative transfer model1. UCLA – Advanced Radiative Transfer
2. UMBC – Including Aerosols in OPTRAN
3. NOAA/ETL – Fast microwave radiance assimilation studies
2. Prepare for advanced instruments1. U. Wisconsin – Polar winds assimilation
2. NASA/GSFC – AIRS and GPS assimilation
3. Advance techniques for assimilating cloud and precipitation information1. U. Wisconsin – Passive microwave assimilation of cloud and precipitation
4. Improve emissivity models and surface products1. Boston U. - Time varying Land & Vegetation
2. U. Arizona – Satellite obs for Snow Data Assimilation
3. Colo. State U. – Surface emissivity error analysis
4. NESDIS/ORA – Retrievals of real-time vegetation properties
5. Improve use of satellite data in ocean data assimilation1. U. Md – Ocean data assimilation bias correction
2. Columbia U. – Use of altimeter data
3. NRL (Monterey) – Aerosol contamination in SST Retrievals
50
Future Plans for Community Models
51
Future Plans• WRF
– Common model infrastructure for mesoscale (NCAR and NCEP Dynamic Core and Physics)
– Sustained by AF, Navy, NCEP, NCAR
– Both cores undergoing testing at NCEP (FSL 3DVAR + Dynamic cores + NCEP post processing)
– First operational implementation at NCEP by Oct ’04
•ESMF–Global common model infrastructure–NCAR, GFDL, NASA/GSFC, MIT, NCEP–Basis for next generation global data assimilation and forecast system
52
Future Plans• Ensemble models
– SREF (10 members twice/day, 48 km, 45 levels, 63 hrs)– Global (10 members twice/day; 105 km to 84 hrs, 210 km
to 384 hrs; 28 levels)
GOAL: To create a North American Ensemble Forecast System with the Canadian Meteorological Centre
Dominant Precip Type63 hour forecast
Valid 12Z,December 5, 2002
53
Summary
• NCEP is positioned to deal with important strategic issues– Climate-weather-water linkage– Expand into “environmental” prediction– Extend predictive capabilities into week 2– Extend consistent predictive capabilities for
extreme events out to Day 7
54
Summary (cont)• Based on Partnership with larger research community
– Community model approach (global and regional)– Active participation in field programs
• North American Monsoon Experiment• THORPEX
– Test Beds:• USWRP/Joint Hurricane Test Bed (TPC)• Hazardous Weather Forecast Test Bed (SPC) • Aviation Test Bed (AWC)• USWRP/Hydrometeorological Test Bed (HPC)
– Data Assimilation efforts through JCSDA
55
End of Slides
56
N.H. 500 mb Height Anomaly Correlation for Forecasts Days 3 (blue), 5 (aqua), and 7 (red)
Monthly Values and Annual Averages
57
S.H. 500 mb Height Anomaly Correlation for Forecasts Days 3 (blue), 5 (aqua), and 7 (red)
Monthly Values and Annual Averages